conole eduserv
TRANSCRIPT
Disruptive Technologiesor new pedagogical possibilities?
Gráinne [email protected]
Eduserv Foundation SymposiumInside out: what do current web trends tell us about the
future of ICT provision for learners and researchers?8th May 2008, London
Education (individualistic, objective) vs. Web 2.0 (social, subjective)
Strangeness vs. familiarity
Slow vs. fast time
Free loaders vs. reuse
Expert view vs. mutual negotiation
Participation vs. acquisition
Knowledge as static vs. participation
Web 2.0/Education
dichotomies
Jones et al. (2008) Networked Learning Conference
TensionsLoosely coupled
Integrated systems
Personalised tools
Institutional tools
Student “control”
Institution “control”
Implications
Strategy & policy
Roles & structures
Changing learning & teaching paradigms
Staff & learner skills set
Issues
• Changing terrain - danger of technological deterministic approach
• Increasing complexity, what metaphors do we need?
• Need new models to understand the relationship between pedagogy and technology
A pedagogic view• Can we articulate a “web 2.0 pedagogy”?
• What models might be useful?
• Vision for new pedagogical models - case studies:
• Learning Design
• Openlearn
• SociaLearn
Web 2.0 pedagogy models
Learning Design
OpenLearn
SociaLearn
AtomisticMapping “tools
in use” and visualisation
HolisticMapping principles
against learning characteristics
Blog as reflective diary
Learning DesignIndividual
Social
Passive Active
Information
Experience
Conole, Dyke et al. (2004), related framework Warburton (2007)
Blog collective class resource
Web 2.0User generated content,
openness, distributed knowledge, collective value
Good learningPersonalised, experiential, collaborative, reflective, cumulative, reflective
Thinking &reflection
Communication & interaction
Experience & activity
Evidence &demonstration
Four inter-connected facets of learning
Dyke, Conole et al., (2007)
Can we use this as a framework for mapping
different forms of Web 2.0 pedagogies?
Principles Thinking & reflection
Experience & activity
Conversation & interaction
Evidence & demonstration
Reflect on experience and
show understanding
Yes Yes
Frequent interactive exercises & feedback
Yes Yes Yes
Provides support for independent
learningYes Yes Yes
Supports collaborative
activitiesYes Yes
McAndrew et al.(www.open.ac.uk/openlearn)
SociaLearn
Web 2.0 for education
Web 2.0 architecture
Learning applications Open API
Walton, Weller, Hirst, Buckingham Shum et al.
Existing OU SOL model
Existing technical & pedagogical
support models (VLE, etc.)
E-learning research &
developments (OpenLearn)
Chang
ing e
duca
tiona
l con
text Changing technical context
Changing societal context
business
applications
API
organisation
Microlearner
Profile
2Learner
Cloudworks
Writes to and imports goals, resources, stream
Create goals, tasks
Pull in and publish relevant content
Pull in and publish relevant courses/designs
Publicise study and learning story
Making connections
Value?
Means of visioning
Mapping principles
to pedagogy
Checklist for new innovations
Mapping tools to pedagogy