consultation meeting on family sensitive social protection ... · employment opportunities will...
TRANSCRIPT
1
ConsultationMeetingonFamilySensitiveSocialProtection(FSSP)
AjointcollaborativeprojectbetweentheDohaInternationalFamilyInstitute(DIFI)andtheUnitedNationsEconomicandSocialCommissionforWesternAsia(UNESCWA).
FamilySensitiveSocialProtectionProject:ExpertMeeting
26-27June2018
ProfessorJacquelineO’Reilly(UniversityofSussex,UK)commentson:AConceptualFrameworkforFamily-SensitiveSocialProtection,
ByProfessorNeilGilbert,UniversityofCalifornia,[email protected]
IntroductionOverallthisisaveryambitiousandcomprehensiveoutlineofaconceptualframeworktoexaminefamilysensitivesocialprotectionpoliciestosupportfamilies.ProfessorGilbertprovidesanextensivereviewoftheexistingevidence,succinctlysummarisedundertwomainconceptualareas:theFamilyandSocialProtectionmeasures,withtheproposaltodevelopanalternativeframework.Hestartsoffbyaskingwhyfocusonfamilysensitivesocialprotection,lookingattopicsaroundfertilityandlifeexpectancyi.e.thedemographictransition.Heprovidesaconceptualframeworkforfamilysensitivesocialprotectionlookingatissuesaroundhowwedefinethefamily,andsecondlyonconceptualframeworksandsocialprotectionmeasures.HeoutlinesanalternativeframeworktooperationallydefineFSSPas“publicprivatesocialprogramsandbenefitsthatsupportfamilyformation,Choice,interdependenceandSolidarity,whichstrengthenthebondsoffamilylifeanditscapacitytoperformtheessentialfunctionsofprocreation,socialisationoftheyoung,carefullypendingmembers,andsocialcohesion.”TheaimistofocusonfacilitatingthestabilityandvitalityoffamilylifeoverthelifecoursethatgoesbeyondtheestablishedOECDconceptualisationoffamilypolicyemphasisingprogrammesandbenefitsclusteredaroundeffortstoharmoniseworkandfamilylifeduringtheearlyyearsofchildrearing.1Theambitionofthisproposalisaimedatgoingbeyondsocialprotectionmeasuresthatimpactonpoverty,genderequality,healthcareandeducation.Asacaveattothisveryambitiousprogramistherecognitiononthelimitstowhatgovernmentscando,amixedrecordofevidenceoftheeffectivenessofpolicymeasuresandthesometimesunintendedconsequencesofthesepolicies.Forexample,heciteshowmeasurestoreducepovertyforexampleinsingleparenthouseholdscanhavetheunintendedconsequencesofgeneratingdisincentivetomarriage(BesharovandGilbert2015).Thisisaveryimpressivepaperintermsofthewidearrayofempiricalevidencethatisdrawntogetherandyetverysuccinctlyandclearlysummarised.However,therearethreecommentsIwouldliketomakewithregardtothisproposedconceptualframeworkinrelationtoavastbodyofEuropeansocialpolicyresearchrelatedto:
1Seehttp://www.oecd.org/els/family/database.htmfordetailsonanumberofmeasurestocomparedifferentdimensionsoffamilylifeandcomparisonsofrecentpolicyinitiatives.
2
I. Conceptualizingwelfareandsocialprotectioninrelationtowork:therelationship
betweensocialreproductionandeconomicproduction
II. Workopportunitiesfordifferentfamilymembers
III. Comparativewelfareandworkregimesforcomparinghouseholds
I.ConceptualisingWelfareandSocialProtectioninrelationtoWork:economicproductionsocialandreproductionThefirstpointtakesissueitthefocusondemographictrendsasthecatalystforsocialprotectionrequirements.Iwouldsuggestthatsocialprotectionneedstobeunderstoodinrelationtoananalysisoftheworldofworkandemployment,i.e.thesphereofeconomicproduction(O’Reillyetal.2017).Conceptualisingfamilyvulnerabilitiesarelargelyrelatedtohowtheyobtainregularandstablesourcesofincome.Thiscanbethroughthestateandformsofsocialprotection.However,mostfamilyincomestreamsaregeneratedthroughworkandemployment.Therefore,itisimportanttofocusontheemploymentopportunitiesavailabletodifferentfamilymembersandhowthesecontributetotheoverallhouseholdeconomy.Byincludingananalysisoftheworldsofwork,orwhatissometimesreferredtoasthesystemofeconomicproduction,weareabletounderstanditsrelationshiptothesphereofsocialreproduction,otherwiseoftenreferredtoastheroleofthefamily.Itistheinteractionbetweenthesetwospheresthatillustratethetypeofvulnerabilitiesfamilymembersaresubjectedto.Thenatureandformoftheseopportunitieswillvarybycountryandregion,aswellasbetweendifferentmembersofthehousehold,orfamilyunit.Includingtheconceptofeconomicproductionleadsustofocusonwhatkindsofworkersemployersarelookingfor?i.e.whoisthemostemployable,andonwhattermsandconditions?Whichfamilymembersareavailableforworkandonwhattermsandatwhattimesoftheday,week,monthoryear?Thisisakeydimensionofeconomicproductionthatisnotcurrentlydiscussedintheproposal.Isuggestthisneedstobeatthecoreofunderstandinghowsocialpoliciesinteracttoprotectdifferentsocialgroupsfromvulnerabilitiesinthelabormarket.Byincludingthisinrelationtotheconceptofsocialreproductionithelpsusfocusontheeconomicaswellassocialrolethefamilyplaysandhowthetwodomainsinteracteffectively,ornot.Wherethesearewellconnectedfamiliesareabletoobtainsufficientresourcesfromemployment(and/orsocialprotectionmeasures)tosupporttheirfamilies.Wherethesesystemsarenotwellconnectedleadustoidentifywhichtypesofvulnerabilitiesfamiliesfaceandwheresocialprotectionmeasuresarerequiredtofillthegaps.Bydrawingonaconceptualframeworkthatincludesboththesphereofsocialreproduction(i.e.thefamily)alongwithunderstandinghowthisis,orisnot,linkedtothedemandsofthesphereofeconomicproduction(i.e.employersdemandforworkers),drawsourattentiontothesecondpointIwouldliketomake:whoworks?II.Whoworks?
3
Theconceptualframeworkcouldbenefitfromdifferentiatingbetweendifferentmembersofthehouseholdandthenatureoftheirparticularsocialrisksandvulnerabilitieswithregardtoobtainingaregularincome.Thisbringsusbacktotheopportunitiesandaccesstheyhavetothelabormarketinordertosecureanindependentincome.Wecanthendifferentiatebetweenthosemembersofthefamilywhocangenerateamarketincomeforthemselves,andpotentiallyotherfamilymemberswhocannot.Therearefamilymemberswhoaremoredependenteitheronsupportfromotherfamilymembers,orsomeformofsocialprotectionintheformsofbenefitsrelatedtounemployment,childcare,pensionsorsicknesssupport.Soforexample,somekeysocialgroupsthatwouldbeworthcomparingacrossanumberofthesocietieswouldincludethefollowing.II.i.Youngpeoplea.YoungpeoplelookingforworkAlthoughyouthunemploymentinEuropehasbeenatitsheightinthepastdecade(O’Reillyetal.forthcoming),thelevelsofyouthunemploymentinArabcountriesissignificantlyhigherandamajorsocialandpoliticalconcern(Table1).2Thelackofabilityforyoungpeopletobeabletoearnanindependentincomeofanykind,withoutsupportfromtheirfamilies,isaseriousareaforsocialpolicyandsocialprotectionpolicies,especiallyinNorthernAfricaandtheArabStates.Table1.Youthunemploymenttrendsandprojectionsto2017,byregion
Source:http://www.ilo.org/global/research/global-reports/weso/2016/WCMS_513739/lang--en/index.htmSocialprotectionpoliciesthereforeneedtoidentifywhatformsofsupporttheseyoungpeoplecanbenefitfrommost.Clearlytheaimofthesepolicieswouldbetointegratethemintoadulttrajectoriestoemployment.ThisraisesparticularissuesrelatedtogenderequalityinthesecountriesdifferentlevelsofattitudesandnormswithregardtodifferencesinmaleandfemaleunemploymentratesacrosstheseArabcountries.
2http://www.ilo.org/beirut/media-centre/news/WCMS_514537/lang--en/index.htm
4
Someformsofsocialpolicyincludethoserelatedtoeducationandtraining,apprenticeshipsystemsandworkplacesubsidiestoenableyoungpeopletoaccesspaidemploymentandanindependentincome.However,wealsoknowthateducationallevelsvaryverysignificantlyacrosstheArabworld.InsomecountriesyoungArabpeopleareextraordinarilywelleducated,whereasothershaveverypoor,ifany,levelsofeducationalattainmentlargelyduetolevelsofeconomicpovertyorconflict.Evenifwefocusonwell-educatedyoungpeople,theiremploymentopportunitieswillclearlybeverydifferentiftheycomefromQatar,EgyptorYemen.ThesedistinctionsareimportantifwearetotalkaboutwhatarethemostappropriatetypesofsocialpoliciestohelpyoungArabpeoplelivingwithinthehousehold.b.ChildlabourOnadifferentlevel,stilllookingatyouth,weneedtotakeaccountoftheroleofchildlabourinrelationtoitssupportoftheoverallhouseholdincome.InsomeArabcountriesthiswillclearlybenegligible,whilstinothersitwillprovideanimportantsourceofrevenueforthefamily.Socialpolicieshereclearlyhavebeendirectedtowardsreducinglevelsofchildlabourandincreasinglevelsofyoungpeoplestayingonineducationobtainingbasicliteracyandnumeracyskillsandbeyond.Bydifferentiatingbetweencountriesinrelationtotheseveryimportantdimensionsleadustoreflectontheappropriatetypesofsocialpoliciesusedtosupportthefamily.Ifchildlabourisnolongerprovidinganincomefortheirfamiliesbecausetheyarenowineducation,thenwhatothersourcesofsocialinsuranceorsupportwillreplacethis?Therehavebeenanumberofexperimentswithbasicincomemodelsintheformofconditionalcashtransfers(CCT)toencouragefamiliestosendtheirchildrentoschoolwhileensuringthatthefamilyhavealevelofrevenuetosupportthis;buttheevidenceontheseeffectsismixed.3Therethenraisestheissueofhowdifferentsocialpoliciesinteractwitheachother.ForexampledrawingonevidencefromtheEUfundedSTYLEproject4wefoundcaseswhereNGOsworkingwithhardtoplaceyoungpeopleencounteredprotestsfromtheirparentswhentheyfoundtheseyoungpeopleanapprenticeshipprogram.Ononehand,onemighthavethoughtthatthefamilywouldbepleasedthattheyoungpersonhadbeenintegratedintopathwayleadingtoaqualificationandajob.Ontheotherhand,theperspectiveoftheparentswasthatbyearninganincome,evenifthisisrathersmall,wouldhaveadirecteffectontheirownentitlementtohousingbenefitintheUK.Asaresulttheypreferredtheirchildrentoremainunemployedsoastomaintaintheirhouseholdwelfareentitlements.Thisiswhyitisimportanttodistinguishbetweenindividualmembersofthehouseholdandtheirroleinthathousehold.Thisrequiresustothinkaboutwhethersocialprotectionneedstobebasedonindividualsorhouseholds,orboth,andhowthesepoliciesinteract.II.ii.WomenThesecondgroupofhouseholdmembersthatneedtobeidentifiedinthisconceptualframeworkarewomen.Inthiscasewecandistinguishbetweenyoungwomenandtheextenttowhichtheyareabletointegrateintothelabourmarket.Thisclearlydependsontheireducationalattainment,locallabourmarketopportunities,theextenttowhichtheirlaboursupplementsthehouseholdincome/budget,andtheculturalnormsaroundfemaleemploymentfordifferentsocialclassesindifferentArabcountries.a.Youngwomen
3https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/working_papers/2012/RAND_WR921-1.pdf4https://www.style-research.eu/
5
IntheArabworldyoungwomenfacesomesimilarproblemstothoseofyoungmen.Butweclearlyneedtodifferentiatewheretheirstatusisreinforcedasdependentwithinthefamily,orwheretheyareexpectedtocontributetothehouseholdbudget.Thesedifferenceswillclearlyvarynotonlybythesocialclassofthefamily,butbytheregionandtheirindividualeducationalattainment.b.Womenasparents,caregiversandworkersAswomengetolder,andsomeofthembecomemothers,towhatextentaretheyexpectedtoparticipateinpaidemploymentintheformalorinformalsector,orthroughfamilybusinessesandself-employment?Or,aretheyexpectedtocontinueprovidingunpaidworktosupportthefamily?Distinguishingbetweenthesedifferentgroupsofwomen,forexample,intermsoftheirparentalduties,educationalattainmentandtheirroleinthefamilyasanincomeproviderorcaregiver(orboth)alsodeterminesthetypesofsocialprotectionpoliciestheyrequire.Understandingtheirstatusinrelationtothelabourmarketwillalsohelpidentifywhichkindsofpoliciesmitigateagainsteconomicvulnerabilitiesthatsocialprotectionissetuptoestablish,andunderwhichcircumstancesaretheselikelytobesociallyaccepted,forexamplepublicservicesforchildcareprovision.Theuptakeofsuchpolicieswillclearlybeaffectedbysocietalnormsconcerningappropriatecaregiversforexampleforyoungchildren.c.WomengettingolderWithinthisgroupandwecanalsodistinguishbetweenwomenastheygetolderandwhethertheirsupportinlaterlifeisdependentonhavingbeeninpaidemploymentandentitlementtoapensionontheirownterms,orwhethertheyarereliantontheworkrecordoftheirmalepartner.Distinguishingbetweenthesecategoriesofthemembersofthehouseholdisveryimportantinidentifyingnotonlytheirneedsasanindividualbutalsohowtheirparticularpositioninteractswithothermembersofthehouseholdandhowcloselythisislinkedtolabourmarketopportunities.Inparticular,ifentitlementtopensionsupportisdependentoncontinuingtobemarriedtothespousereceivingthepensionbenefits.II.iii.Migrantlabor:dispersedanddislocatedfamiliesThethirdgroupthatisworthdistinguishingbetweenrelatestomigrantlabouranddispersedanddislocatedfamilies.WithintheArabworldthereareverysignificantflowsofdifferenttypesofmigrantworkers.Thisgroupofpeopleclearlypresentsomesignificantchallengestothenatureandcoverageofsocialprotectionentitlements.Forexample,whethertheyarelegalworkersandwhatlevelsofsocialinsurancecontributionsthattheymay,ormaynot,bepaying;whetherthereisanyportabilityofsocialprotectionrightsovertheirlifecourse,basedontheperiodoftimetheyhaveworkedinthehostcountry,shouldtheyreturntotheirhomecountry.Insomecasestheseworkerswillbehighlyqualifiedmigrantsfromthenorthernhemispherewhosecompanyremunerationpackagescoverthesecontingencies,andwheretheymaybeabletobringtheirfamilieswiththem.ThisgroupofworkersarelesslikelytocomeundertheremitoftheFSSPconcerns.Othermigrantworkers,forexamplethosecomingfromChina,maybeoutsidesocialprotectioncoverageinthecountriestheyareworkingintemporarily.5
5http://www.sais-cari.org/data-chinese-workers-in-africa/andhttps://www.ft.com/content/7106ab42-80d1-11e7-a4ce-15b2513cb3ff
6
InothercasesmigrantsfromotherpartsofthecontinentofAfricaorfromtheglobalsoutharemorelikelytobeworkinginlowpaidandprecariousemployment,withtheirincomesbeingusedasremittancestosupporttheirfamiliesintheirhomecountries.Distinguishingbetweenpeoplewhobelongtodislocatedhouseholdsandfamiliesisalsoclearlyaveryimportantdimensionofsocialprotectionforthesefamilies.However,thecharacteristicsofmigrationindifferentpartsoftheArabworldintermsofwheretheycomefrom,thetypesofeconomicvulnerabilitiestheyaresubjectedto,andtheirentitlementtoanyformsofsocialprotectionvarysignificantly.Somerecognitionofthisdiversityneedstobetakenaccountofintheoverallconceptualframeworkifitisgoingtospeaktospecificneedsandtargetedfamilysensitivepoliciesforthesetypesofhouseholds,oriftheyaretobeexcludedfromtheanalysis.III.Crossnationalcomparativeresearchonwelfareandworkregimes,andpatternsofhouseholdemploymentThethirdcommentontheconceptualframeworkrelatestocrossnationalcomparativeframeworks.AsignificantbodyofEuropeanresearchhasdistinguishedbetweencountriesintermsofwhetherthesearestrong,moderateorweakmalebreadwinnersocieties.Thisdistinguishesbetweensocietieswherewomenaremorelikelytobedependentonamaleearnerandlesslikelytowork;moderatemalebreadwinnersocietieswherethewomanismorelikelytoworkonapart-timebasisandthemanonfull-timebasis;anddualfull-timeearnerswherebothmembersofthefamilyparticipateinfulltimepaidemployment.Muchofthisresearchhasfocusedontheimpactofsocialpoliciesincreatingincentivesforthesedifferentfamilymodels;someofthisanalysishasalsodifferentiatedbetweencontradictorysocialpoliciesco-existingwithinregimetypes(Saraceno2016;SaracenoandKeck2011).Morerecentstudieshaveemphasisedtheimportanceoflabourmarketopportunitiesandthediversityofhouseholdemploymentpatternswithinthesedifferentregimetypes(Sanchez-MiraandO’Reillyforthcoming)(SeeFigureinAppendixtoillustratehowthesehouseholdemploymentcategoriesaredistributedacrosstheEU).Clearlythereareimportantdifferencesbetweensocietiesinthedominantcharacteristicsofhouseholdemploymentthatareareflectionofanumberoffactors.First,inasocietyassociatedwithmoretraditionalmalebreadwinnermodels,levelsoffemaleemploymentareusuallyverylow.Thiscaneitherbearesultofthefactthatthemalebreadwinner(MBW)iscapableofearningenoughmoneytosupportthetraditionalfamilyformoritcanalsobeareflectionthatthereareveryfewjobopportunitiesforwomeninthelabourmarket.Itistheinteractionbetweentheselabourmarketopportunities,familyformsandformsofsocialprotectionthataffectthetypesofvulnerabilitiesfamiliesexperience.Insomecountriessocialpoliciesencouragetraditionalfamilyforms,inothersitisbecausetherearenojobopportunitiesforwomen,andnosocialpolicysupporteither.TheMBWfamilymodelstypifiesaperiodofthepost1950speriodwhenthemaleearnerwasexpectedtobecapableofearningthefamilywagetosupporthimselfandhisdependentsi.e.hisfamily,hischildrenandpotentiallyanyothermembersofthefamilyrequiringcareandsupportthatwereunabletoprovidetheirownindependentincome.However,theidealofthe‘familywage’foughtforbytradeunionswasamiddleclassidealthatwasoftennotrealisedinworkingclassfamilieswherewomen’slabourcontinuedtomakeasignificantcontributiontothehouseholdthroughvariousformsofformalandinformalemployment.ThedeclineofthemalebreadwinnerfamilymodelinEuropecanbeattributabletoeitherwomenaccessingemploymentbecauseofincreasedequalityandjobopportunitiesinthelocalmarket,orbecauselowmalewagesrequiresasupplementaryfemaleincome.Thecatalystfordualearnerhouseholdsdependsverymuchonwherethesefamiliesarelocatedinthe
7
Europeancontext.Forexample,inScandinaviancountriesdualfull-timeearnerhouseholdsarequitecommon,thestandardoflivinginhiscountriesisalsohighbothcouplesareabletoaearnareasonableincomesupportedbyahigh-levelofwelfareincomeacrossthelifecourse.Inothercountries,forexampleinEasternEurope,theevidenceofdualfull-timeowninghouseholdsaremoreoftentheresultsofeconomicnecessitywheremalewagesaretoolowtosustainahouseholdeconomy,butthefragilityofsocialsupportsystemsalsomakesthemveryvulnerableduringrecentperiodsofeconomiccrisis(Sanchez-MiraandO’Reillyforthcoming).TheimplicationsofthislongtraditionofcomparativeresearchinEuropeinrelationtowelfarestatesandemploymentsystemsisrelevanttotheconceptualdevelopmentpresentedbyProfGilbert.ItwouldseemnecessarytodeveloptheframeworkthatallowedustocomparebetweendifferentArabcountries,aswedowithintheEuropeanUnion.Thiscomparativeframeworkcoulddistinguishbetweenregionsorcountriesthatiscloselyrelatedtoformsofeconomicdevelopmentandlabormarketopportunitiesforwomenandyoungpeople.Withoutthisbackgroundcontexttoassessthenatureofvulnerabilityfamiliesexperienceimpliesthatproposalsforsocialprotectionpolicieswillbetoogenericandlacktraction.ConcludingcommentsontheconceptualframeworkThemainpointshereare:First,weneedtointegrateananalysisofemploymentopportunitiestoidentifywheretherearegapsinsocialprotection.Wealsoneedtotakeaccountoftheworldofworkinordertounderstandwhowillbeabletopaydifferentformsofsocialprotectionandwhowillbeentitledtoclaimthese,andonwhatbasis.Itisessentialthatthesespheresofeconomicproductionneedtobeincludedwithananalysisofvulnerabilitiesfacedbythoseinthesphereofsocialreproduction.Socialprotectionpoliciescanthenbetargetedateitherorbothspheresintermsofdirectinterventionsforfamilies,orinpoliciesdirectedatemployerstomakeitmoreattractivetoemploythesetargetmembersofthefamily.Second,weneedtodifferentiatebetweenmembersofthehouseholdandtheircontributiontohouseholdincomeandhowthisrelatestotheirvulnerabilitiesandneedforsocialprotection,bothasindividualsandashouseholdmembers.Thisincludesdifferentiatingbetweenthesituationforyoungpeople,womenandmigrantworkersfromdislocatedfamilies.Third,weneedtodifferentiatebetweendifferentArabcountriesintermsofwealth,workandwelfareinordertounderstandwhatarethespecificcharacteristicsoffamilytypesinthesedifferentsocieties.Finally,weneedtounderstandhowtheproposedconceptwouldprovideabetterconceptualframeworkforanalysistoinformpolicymakingincomparisontotheworkthathasalreadybeenconductedbytheOECD.
8
SpecificquestionsSession2.MeanstestedsocialbenefitsandtheformationofstablefamiliesWhatincentivesanddisincentivesfortheformationofstablefamiliesaregeneratedbymeanstestedsocialbenefitssuchassocialassistance,housingsubsidiesandchildren’sallowance.OneissuethatarisesintheUKrelatestotheimportanceofhousingbenefitandoverallhouseholdincome.TheexamplegivenfromtheSTYLEprojectaboveillustratesthis.Whenayoungpersonlivinginahouseholddependentonbenefitsmovesintoapositionofearninganincome,evenifitisratherlow,forexamplebyparticipatinginapprenticeshipprogramme,thisaffectsfamily’sentitlementtohousingbenefit.Thisexampleindicatesthattheinteractionofdifferentbenefitscancreatedisincentivestoworkandthatpolicyregimescanworkagainsteachother(SaracenoandKeck2011).UniversalCreditTheUKgovernmenthavebeenkeentointroduceUniversalCredit(UC)6wheretheoverallhouseholdincomeandjobsearchactivityisassessedthroughonebenefitsystem.Whilethisapproachwasintendedtoreducebureaucraticregulationscoveringanumberofbenefits,inpracticetheresultshavebeenassessedasverypoorandunlikelytoachieveanysavings.TheNationalAuditCommissionconcludedinJune2017thattheUCprogramme‘isnotvalueformoneynow,andthatitsfuturevalueformoneyisunproven.’7ThedeliveryofthissystemhasincurredanumberofdelaysinitsimplementationacrosstheUKsothatparallelbenefitsystemsareoperatingsimultaneously.Theeffectsofthispolicyonfamiliesarenumerous.First,anumberofhouseholdshaveexperiencedextensivedelaysbeforetheyhavereceivedtheirbenefitpayments.ArecentstudyhasshownthatwiththeimplementationofUniversalCredittherehasbeenasimultaneousriseinthenumberofpeoplegoingtofoodbanksintheUKbecausetheydonothavesufficientincometosupportthemselveswhiletheyarewaitingfortheirbenefitstobeprocessedandpaid.8Second,manypeoplehavebeenveryharshlysanctionedfornotattendingjobcentreinterviewsorjobplacements,eveniftheyhavegivenjustifiablereasons,suchasgivingbirth,attendingtheirparents’funeral,nothavingthefundstotravel,orgoingtoajobinterviewatthesametime.9Theconsequencesofthesesanctionsanddelaysaretoincreasetheriskoffallingintodebt,failingtopayrentontimewiththepossibilityofbeingevicted,orevenfindingrentalaccommodationasthistrendbecomesmorewidelyknowntolandlords.Thesekindsofstressesexacerbatedifficultiesthesefamiliesface.Third,accordingtoRitaGriffith(2017)10UCcouldhaveunintendedconsequencesforfamilyformationandthestabilityofrelationshipsbecauseoftheneedtostipulatewhichmemberofthecoupleshouldreceivethismonthlybenefit.Thisremovesorreducesamother'saccesstoanindependentincomeandrequiresonepartnerinacoupletobefinanciallydependentonthe
6https://www.gov.uk/universal-credit7https://www.nao.org.uk/report/rolling-out-universal-credit/8https://www.trusselltrust.org/what-we-do/research-advocacy/universal-credit-and-foodbank-use/9https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/universal-credit-what-is-it-has-it-improved-benefits-system-why-controversial-a8402286.html10http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/universal-credit-family-structure/
9
other.Thishasbeeninfluentialinpartneringdecisionsandlivingarrangementsforlow-incomefamilies.“Rollingallbenefitspayabletogetherinonelumpsumpercoupleeffectivelyreversesthepreviousreformwhichallowedchildtaxcreditandthechildcareelementofworkingtaxcredittobepaidtothemaincarer.UnderUC,otherthanin‘exceptionalcircumstances,’forexampleprovencasesofdomesticorfinancialabuse,theonlychoicecouplescanexerciseistonominatetheaccountintowhichUCispaid.Ifthisisnotajointaccount,onememberofthecouplewillreceivetheentireawardwhichcouldincludefinancialsupportforrentandchildcarecosts.”IfUCispaidintothemalepartner’saccount,orajointaccounttowhichthefemalepartnerhasnoorlimitedaccess,thiswouldrepresentasignificantintra-householdredistributionofincomefrom‘pursetowallet,’reinforcingtheeconomicdependenceofsomewomenandpotentiallytrappingsomeinabusivesituations.Asinglemonthlypaymentcouldthereforeincreasetheriskofdebtandrentarrears,undermininghouseholdfinancialsecurity,andpotentiallyincreasingwomen’sandchildren’spoverty.Absorptionofchildtaxcreditandthechildcareelementofworkingtaxcreditintoasinglehouseholdawardalsounderminestheprinciple,evidencedbyresearch,thatthesepaymentsaremosteffectiveinreachingtheirintendedbeneficiarieswhenpaidtothecaringparent.TheincorporationofhousingbenefitintoUCcouldincreasethelikelihoodofevictionifmoneyintendedforrentiswithheldorspentinotherwaysbyoneofthepartners.AlthoughcertainclaimantscanrequestthatthehousingelementofUCispaiddirecttoaprivatelandlord,bothmembersofthecouplemustagreetosuchalternativepaymentarrangements.”Thiscoulddestabiliserelationshipsanddiscourageloneparentsfromre-partnering.SocialSecurityrulesshapetheparametersaroundwhichsomeofthesevulnerablefamiliesdecidewhethertoestablishtheirrelationshipasacouplelivingtogetherorwhetherthereareincentivestoremainassingleparents;aproblemidentifiedbyBesharovandGilbert(2015).AccordingtoGriffiths:“AttheheartoftheissuearetwopoorlyunderstoodaspectsofUKsocialsecurity–the‘LivingTogetherasaMarriedCouple’regulation(knownasthecohabitationrule)andthefamily-basedsystemofmeanstesting.Basedonadefinitionofcohabitationas‘marriage-like’andoutdatednotionsofbreadwinning,coupleswhosharethesamehouseholdhavenoindependentrighttoclaimmeans-testedbenefitsortaxcredits;ifeligibleforhelp,theymustclaimjointly.Althoughcouplescancurrentlychoosetopaycertaintaxcreditstothemaincarer,thereisnolegalobligationonthepersonwhoreceivesthebenefittotransferanypartofthejointpaymenttotheirpartner.Whenalow-incomemotherstartstolivewithapartner,shethereforeriskslosingherbenefitortaxcreditentitlementaltogether.Inthiscontext,whoinacouplewasearning,whowasentitledtoclaimbenefitsandtaxcredits,whoreceivedpaymentandhowhouseholdincomewasaccessedanddistributedunderdifferentpartnershipandlivingarrangements,matteredagreatdeal.”Cohabitationcanresultinalossofincomeandfinancialautonomyforwomeninparticular.“financialdependenceonapartnerfelttobeunacceptableinamodern-dayrelationshipbutwhenawomanisnotmarriedtoherpartner,thestakesareconsiderablyhigher,moreespeciallyifheisnotthebiologicalfatherofherchildorchildren;unlikespouses,cohabiteesareundernolegalobligationtofinanciallysupportoneanother.Cedingresponsibilityforsafeguardingthefamily’sfinancialwell-beingtoaneworunprovenpartnerwasseentobeaparticularlyriskyarrangement.Thoughloneparenthoodwasnotwithoutitsownchallengesand
10
risks,somesinglemothersruledoutanyformofrelationshipwhiletheywerereliantonbenefits.Otherswithpartnersinlow-paidorinsecureworkchoseto‘liveaparttogether’.”Griffiths(2017)arguesthatthesechangescanalsohavedestabilisingeffectsoncohabitingcouples.“Inabilitytoaccessthefamily’sbenefitincomewhenclaimingjointlyhadalsode-stabilisedsomecouples’relationships,contributinginsomecasestofamilybreakdown.Morebroadly,findingssuggestthatinthecontextofaprecariouslabourmarketforlow-skilledmenandaneverstringentsocialsecuritysystem,farfrombeingprotective,livingtogetherasacouplehadcometorepresentanarenaofincreasinguncertainty,insecurityandrisk…..Withoutameaningfulpolicyadjustment,forexampleenablingthechild-relatedelementstobepaidtothenominatedleadcareror,asinScotland,allowingjointclaimantstosplittheUCpaymentequally,thegovernment’sclaimthatthatUChasbeendesignedtopromoteself-relianceandpersonalindependencehassomethingofahollowring.”Children’sallowanceWithregardtochildren’sallowancethishasbeensignificantlyreformedinthepast10yearssothathigherincomehouseholdsnolongerhaveanyentitlementtochildbenefit.Ifonememberofthehouseholdisearningover£50,000ayearthehouseholdhasnoentitlementtothisbenefit.Iftwomembersofthehouseholdlearning£49,000poundsayearthehouseholdwouldbeentitledtoreceivethesebenefits;initialprotestattheunfairnessofthisschemeleadtosignificantcriticisms.ThisisareflectionofchanginghouseholdandemploymentpatternsintheUKwiththedeclineofmalebreadwinnerfamilymodelandtheriseofdualearnerhouseholds.Inthiscasewherethereisonlyoneincomeandthatisrelativelyhighthesefamiliesare,inrelationtotwofull-timeearners,disadvantaged.Whateffectdoesthishaveontheformationofstablefamilies?TheUKhashadarelativelyhighlevelofyoungpeoplelivingindependentlyatanearlyageespeciallyincomparisontoyoungpeoplefromsouthernEurope.Thishadbeenattributedtotheabilityforsomeyoungpeopletogainformsofsocialassistanceandhousingbenefittoenablethemtomoveawayfromtheparentalhome.However,recentwelfarereformshavesoughtprogressivelyoverthepast30yearstoreducethisindependententitlementtoyoungpeople.Increasinglyyoungpeoplearenotentitledtosocialassistanceorwelfarebenefitsorunemploymentinsuranceorhousingbenefituntiltheyreachprogressivelyolderyears(LeschkeandFinn(forthcoming),Smithetal.(forthcoming)).Asaresultoftherecentten-yearperiodofausteritywehadincreasinglyseenyoungpeopleremainingintheparenthomeorreturningtoitintimesofeconomicadversity(MazzottaandParisiforthcoming).Andinsomecases,especiallyinEasternEurope,itisyoungpeople’semploymentthatissupportingthehouseholdduringthisperiodofausterity(MedgyesiandNagyforthcoming).Someofthefactorsthatexplainwhyyoungpeopleareunabletoestablishtheirownhouseholdsindependentoftheparentalfamilyareduetoalackoflabourmarketopportunities,orwhentheycangetajobtheincomeitisinsufficientlyhighforthemtobeabletoaffordrentalcostsofindependentliving.IncreasinghighcostsofhousinganditslimitedavailabilityareofconcerninmanyEuropeancountries.TheshortageofhowavailablehousinghasexacerbatedanincreasingexponentialgrowthinthecostahouseorflathomesothatmanyyoungpeoplefeeltheywillneverbeabletobeabletomoveoutofrentalaccommodationintheUK.11
11https://www.resolutionfoundation.org/media/press-releases/up-to-a-third-of-millennials-face-renting-from-cradle-to-grave/
11
Day2session2WorkorientedbenefitsandfamilylifeSocialprotectionmeasuressuchaspaidparentalleave,parttimeworkearlychildcareimpactonchildbearingandsocialisationfunctionsofthefamily.Thegrowthofpart-timeworkinthe1980saccountedforincreasinglevelsoffemaleparticipationinthelabourmarketintheUK.FertilityratesstillremainrelativelyhighintheUKdespitethelackofissubsidisedchildcareprovision.Thoseinparttimejobsarealsomorelikelytobeinlow-paidlowskilledjobsandweknowthatgenderpaygapinthesejobsismuchhighertheninthelabourforceingeneral.Wealsoknowthatalthoughpart-timeworkisoftenarguedtoallowwomenasteppingstonebetweenfulltimeemploymentatparticularphasesinthelifecourse,whatwefindfromempiricalresearchisthatoncewomenmovedintopart-timeworktheirprobabilityofdroppingoutofemploymentismuchhigherthanthosewhogobacktoworkonfull-timebasis.Therehasbeenagrowingbodyofresearchrelatedtoparentalleaveandtheprovisionformentotakethisup.Whiletherehasbeensomeevidencethatsomemenaremakingmoreusethisthanwasthecaseinthepast,thesecasesneverthelessstillremainratherlimitedanddonotseemtoleadtoasignificanttransformationofdomesticcaredutieswithinthefamily.Althoughitwouldbewrongtosaythattherehasbeennochangeallinthatintermsofculturalnorms:insomecircumstancesitisbecomemoreacceptabletotakethisleave.Nevertheless,thetypeofmenwhotakethisaremorelikelytobehighlyeducatedandworkinthepublicsector,comparedtothosewhoworkintheprivatesectororareself-employed.
12
References:Besharov,D.J.andGilbert,N.(2015)‘MarriagePenaltiesintheModernSocial-WelfareState’,R
StreetPolicyStudyNo.40(September).
Griffiths,R.(2017)‘NoLoveontheDole:TheInfluenceoftheUKMeans-testedWelfareSystemonPartneringandFamilyStructure’JournalofSocialPolicypublishedonline8thFebruaryhttps://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279417000046
Leschke,J.andM.Finn(forthcoming)‘Labormarketflexibilityandincomesecurity:ChangesforEuropeanyouthduringtheGreatRecession’inO’Reilly,J.,Leschke,J.,Ortlieb,R.,Seeleib-Kaiser,M.andVilla,P.(eds.)YouthLabourinTransition:Inequalities,MobilityandPoliciesinEurope(NewYork:OxfordUniversityPress).
Mazzotta,F.andL.Parisi(forthcoming)‘Stuckintheparentalnest?TheeffectoftheeconomiccrisisonyoungEuropeans’livingarrangements’inO’Reilly,J.,Leschke,J.,Ortlieb,R.,Seeleib-Kaiser,M.andVilla,P.(eds.)YouthLabourinTransition:Inequalities,MobilityandPoliciesinEurope(NewYork:OxfordUniversityPress).
Medgyesi,MandI.Nagy(forthcoming)‘Incomesharingandspendingdecisionsofyoungpeoplelivingwiththeirparents’inO’Reilly,J.,Leschke,J.,Ortlieb,R.,Seeleib-Kaiser,M.andVilla,P.(eds.)YouthLabourinTransition:Inequalities,MobilityandPoliciesinEurope(NewYork:OxfordUniversityPress).
O’Reilly,J.,Leschke,J.,Ortlieb,R.,Seeleib-Kaiser,M.andVilla,P.(forthcoming)(eds.)YouthLabourinTransition:Inequalities,MobilityandPoliciesinEurope(NewYork:OxfordUniversityPress).
O’Reilly,J.,Smith,M.andVilla,P.,(2017)‘Thesocialreproductionofyouthlabourmarketinequalities:theeffectsofgender,householdsandethnicity’inDamianGrimshaw,ColetteFagan,GailHebson,IsabelTavora(eds.)(2017)Makingworkmoreequal:Anewlabourmarketsegmentationapproach(Manchester:MUP)pp.249-267.
Sanchez-Mira,N.andO’Reilly,J.(forthcoming)‘HouseholdemploymentandthecrisisinEurope’Work,EmploymentandSociety.
Saraceno,C.(2016)‘Varietiesoffamilialism:ComparingfoursouthernEuropeanandEastAsianwelfareregimes.’JournalofEuropeanSocialPolicy26(4):314-326.
Saraceno,C.andKeck,W.(2011)‘Towardsanintegratedapproachfortheanalysisofgenderequityinpoliciessupportingpaidworkandcareresponsibilities.’Demographicresearch25:371-406.
Smith,M.,J.Leschke,H.Russell,andP.Villa(forthcoming)‘Stressedeconomies,distressedpolicies,anddistraughtyoungpeople:Europeanpoliciesandoutcomesfromayouthperspective’inO’Reilly,J.,Leschke,J.,Ortlieb,R.,Seeleib-Kaiser,M.andVilla,P.(eds.)YouthLabourinTransition:Inequalities,MobilityandPoliciesinEurope(NewYork:OxfordUniversityPress).
13
Figure1.DistributionofhouseholdtypeswithinEuropeancountries,bycountryclusters2007
CountryabbreviationsAT-Austria
BE-Belgium
CY-Cyprus
CZ-CzechRepublic
DE-Germany
DK-Denmark
EE-Estonia
EL-Greece
ES-Spain
FI-Finland
FR-France
HU-Hungary
IE-Ireland
IS-Iceland
IT-Italy
LT-Lithuania
LU-Luxembourg
LV-Latvia
NL-Netherlands
NO-Norway
PL-Poland
PT-Portugal
SE-Sweden
SL-Slovenia
SK-Slovakia
UK-UnitedKingdom
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
SK EE SI LT LV PT FI CZ CY HU PL DK NO IS SE FR UK BE IE AT LU DE NL EL ES IT
Dual Earner Full-Time Dual Earner Mixed Multiple Modes Polarized
7-Others
6-Workless
5-Female breadwinner
4-Male Breadwinner-Female Unemployed
3-Male breadwinner-Female Caregiver
2-Modified male breadwinner
1-Both full-time
14