consumer brand and unbrand

Upload: charu-arora

Post on 04-Mar-2016

14 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • SIT Journal of Management

    Vol. 2. No. 2. December 2012. Pp. 122-138

    0 Krishnan, Pande, & Mule

    ISSN: 2278-9111

    Determinants of Consumer Behaviour towards Branded & Unbranded Products

    Mahalaxmi Krishnan*, V S Pande**

    & Mayuresh Mule***

    ABSTRACT

    Economic liberalization, globalization, developments in ICT, changing demographics, emergence of

    women power, and rising middle class have led to more disposable incomes in both urban and rural India.

    Spending patterns have changed from being frugal to indulgence. Discretionary incomes are going into

    television, two wheelers, automobiles, cell phones, etc. Interestingly, while sale of branded products have

    increased significantly, grey market continues to thrive. Unbranded PCs are still found in affluent houses.

    Middle class consider the unbranded PC makers as their friendly neighborhood suppliers, who offer

    personalized support services. Cell phones are enticing people to the grey market. While people buy

    branded bath soaps, they do not mind buying local or unbranded soap for washing utensils. This research

    based on field study as well as desktop analysis of the available literature was done with the objective of

    ascertaining the determinants for consumer preference for branded and unbranded products. This study

    would help in brand strategy and positioning especially in the vast expanding rural areas where there is

    pronounced tilt towards local or unbranded products. The challenge before the manufacturers and

    marketers is whether Indian consumers purchase products or brands. Their key task is to convert

    consumer preference and loyalty towards brands.

    Keywords: Brand Equity, Brand Awareness, Brand Positioning, Brand Loyalty, Retail Market,

    Consumer Behaviour

    *Dr Mahalaxmi Krishnan, Associate Professor, Department of Commerce, K J Somaiya

    College of Arts & Commerce, Mumbai , PhD Guide in Management Studies, SNDT University.

    e-mail : [email protected]. M: +91(0)989200920.

    **Prof V S Pande, Head, Department of Commerce, K J Somaiya College of Arts &

    Commerce, Mumbai, e-mail : [email protected]. M: +91(0)989200920.

    ***Dr Mayuresh Mule, Vice Principal , K J Somaiya College of Arts & Commerce, Mumbai, e-mail : [email protected]. M: +91(0)9892009201.

  • SIT Journal of Management

    Vol. 2. No. 2. December 2012. Pp. 122-138

    1 Krishnan, Pande, & Mule

    ISSN: 2278-9111

    1. Introduction

    The rapid evolution of communication and mobile technology has resulted in seamless flow of

    information across all consumer segments. This together with the progressive liberalization of

    the Indian economy has brought fundamental shifts in Indian consumer behaviour. They are a

    lot more discriminatory in their choice of products and services and preferences. Their spending

    habits have changed and they do not mind splurging. While they are brand conscious, they

    continue to buy non branded products. The challenge for the marketers today is creating brand

    awareness, brand building and positioning. Branding helps establish companys strategy.

    Successful brands provide competitive advantage in terms of brand loyalty and brand extensions.

    The vast Indian consumer market covering the rural and urban areas is heterogeneous where both

    branded and unbranded products co-exist. Creating Brand equity is a critical success factor in

    todays competitive market. Successful brands provide competitive advantage in terms of brand

    loyalty and brand extensions. This study based on field study and published research and

    literature on the subject aims to fathom the trend and consumer preferences to branded and

    unbranded products and services.

    Entry of foreign brands has intensified the brand war. The young work force is brand conscious

    and has no qualms in shifting to newer brands. They are more demanding and choosey on the

    basis of extrinsic features and intrinsic values. FMCG market comprising of the large number of

    low priced daily use non durable products fall prey to the unpredictable behaviour of the youth

    population whose brand loyalty changes with their moods. While some brands like blue lagoon,

    apache, etc. failed, many like Cadburys, Maruti, Amul, Lux could withstand competition for

    long periods of time due to innovations sustaining customer attention and loyalty.

    2. Rationale of the Study

    Kotler (2000) says branding is a major issue in product strategy. Even after two decades of

    economic liberalization and entry of many foreign brands in India , unbranded products continue

    to compete with the branded ones. This research study examines the consumer behaviour

  • SIT Journal of Management

    Vol. 2. No. 2. December 2012. Pp. 122-138

    2 Krishnan, Pande, & Mule

    ISSN: 2278-9111

    towards branded products in the midst of the paradigm changes taking place in the Indian

    economy.

    3. Objective of the study

    i) Determinants for customer preferences for branded and unbranded products from

    primary data analysis

    ii) Strategies and Conclusions based on primary data and secondary published literature

    and research studies.

    4. Literature review

    The American Marketing Association (AMA) defines brand as a name, term, sign, symbol, or

    design, or a combination of them, intended to identify the goods and services of one seller or

    group of sellers and to differentiate them from those of competitors. Kotler (2000) defined

    brand as the name, associated with one or more items in the product line that is used to identify

    the source of character of the item(s). According to Davis and Dunn (2002) focusing on the

    latest and greatest advertising campaign meant focusing on the brand. It was always referred to

    as a series of tactics and never like strategy.

    According to Cobb-Walgren et al. (1995), high brand equity levels lead to higher consumer

    preferences and purchase intentions. Farquhar (1989) concludes that high brand equity enables

    successful extensions, resilience against competitors promotional pressures, and creates entry

    barriers to competitors. Cunningham (1956) in his study on brand loyalty and store loyalty

    attempted to find out whether the consumers who are brand loyal are also store loyal. Shopping

    proneness is another characteristic that has been related to brand loyalty. According to Goldman

    A. (1976) consumers with relatively lower income do not indulge in extensive shopping as there

    means are limited. They also make less use of the shopping available.

    Agarwal A. K. (1983) observed that consumers in general were found to be quite loyal to the

    brands of frequently purchased items. The store loyalty was also observed to be high albeit

  • SIT Journal of Management

    Vol. 2. No. 2. December 2012. Pp. 122-138

    3 Krishnan, Pande, & Mule

    ISSN: 2278-9111

    lower than brand loyalty. Albert Merunka (2008) looked at 11 dimensions of consumer love for

    a brand and brand relationship. Mattilla and Andrew (2008) looked at the influence of emotions

    on satisfaction and loyalty. Thomson and Park (2005) developed a scale for consumer

    attachments that included affection, passion and connection. It did not however examine other

    dimensions and the impact on brand switching. Bravo Fraj Martenez (2007) observed that more

    serious and responsible roles make consumers switch over to the brand used by their parents.

    The available literature and research reveal that brand preference and loyalty is the interplay of

    factors including emotional and psychological ones. The reviews highlight that in a dynamically

    changing world, organizations would need to do research on consumer behaviour in a continuous

    basis more so at granular level to perceive the small imperceptible changes at the incipient stage.

    In India the pitch is further queered because the urban and rural markets are extremely different

    and in both the markets people continue to indulge in non branded or local products.

    5. Research Methodology

    5.1 Coverage of Study

    This study examines the consumer behaviour towards branded and unbranded products and

    services and retailers perception of the same with the help of a field survey using structured

    questionnaire followed by interviews.

    5.2 Sampling Design, Sample Size and Data Sources

    Data and information were gathered from primary source by means of field survey using

    structured questionnaires containing dichotomous and multiple choice questions covering retail

    consumers and retailers on random sample basis in Mumbai and Thane and from secondary

    published sources. The sample size consisted of 50 consumer respondents on a random sample

    basis.

    Primary sources included personal interviews for open ended questions. The consumers were

    interviewed at their homes and offices and on shop floors. Secondary sources included books,

  • SIT Journal of Management

    Vol. 2. No. 2. December 2012. Pp. 122-138

    4 Krishnan, Pande, & Mule

    ISSN: 2278-9111

    journals, newspapers, websites, and research studies. They are used for literature review and

    conceptual reference.

    5.3 Data analysis

    A critical qualitative analysis of the data and information were made keeping the objectives of

    the study in mind. The collected primary data were classified, tabulated and analyzed using

    statistical techniques. Analytical tools like percentage, cross tabs, graphs and pie-charts were

    used for analysis and interpretation.

    6. Findings of the Study

    6.1 Primary Data Analysis

    6.1.1 Demographics: Demographics of the sample respondents are as follows.

    i. Age Group

    Table 1: Age Profile of Respondents

    Age Group No. %

    15-25 yrs 9 18.00%

    26-35 yrs 17 34.00%

    36-45 yrs 10 20.00%

    46-55 yrs 2 4.00%

    56-75 yrs 12 24.00%

    Total 50 100.00%

    Age-wise distribution of the respondents is given in Table 1 and Fig 1. 18% of respondents were

    in the age group of 15 to 25 years, 34% in the age group of 26 to 35 years; 20% belonged to the

    Fig 1: Age Profile

    15-25

    18%

    26-35

    34%36-45

    20%

    46-55

    4%

    56-75

    24%

  • SIT Journal of Management

    Vol. 2. No. 2. December 2012. Pp. 122-138

    5 Krishnan, Pande, & Mule

    ISSN: 2278-9111

    36 to 45 years age group, 4% belonged to the group 46 or 55 years and the remaining 24%

    belonged to the 56 to 75 years age group. The sample design is thus fairly wide-spread across all

    age groups.

    ii. Educational Qualification

    Table 2: Educational Qualification

    Qualification No. %

    Undergraduate 22 44.00%

    Graduate 21 42.00%

    Post graduate 7 14.00%

    Total 50 100.00%

    Distribution of sample respondents Educational Qualification is given in Table 2 and Fig 2.

    While 44% of respondents were undergraduates, 42% were graduates with the remaining 14%

    Post Graduates.

    iii. Composition of Respondents

    Fig 2: Profile of Educational Qualification

    Undergraduate

    44%

    Graduate

    42%

    Post graduate

    14%

  • SIT Journal of Management

    Vol. 2. No. 2. December 2012. Pp. 122-138

    6 Krishnan, Pande, & Mule

    ISSN: 2278-9111

    Table3: Composition of Respondents

    Sex No. %

    Male 20 40.00%

    Female 30 60.00%

    Total 50 100.00%

    The sample respondents comprised of 40% males and 60% females.

    .iv. Category of Respondents

    Table 4: Category of Respondents

    Category No. %

    Students 5 10.00%

    Working men 16 32.00%

    Working women

    22 44.00%

    Housewives 7 14.00%

    Total 50 100.00%

    Table 4 and Fig 4 give the category-wise frequency distribution of the sample respondents. 10%

    of respondents were students, 32% were working men, 44% working women and the balance

    14% housewives.

    6.2 Primary Data Analysis of Customer Respondents

    6.2.1 Customers Responses to Branded Products

    Fig 3: Composition of Respondents

    Male

    40%

    Female

    60%

    Fig 4: Category of Respondents

    Students

    10%

    Working men

    32%

    Working

    women

    44%

    Housewives

    14%

  • SIT Journal of Management

    Vol. 2. No. 2. December 2012. Pp. 122-138

    7 Krishnan, Pande, & Mule

    ISSN: 2278-9111

    i. Motivation for Purchasing Branded Products

    Table 5: Motivators for purchase of

    Branded Products

    No. Percenta

    ge (%)

    Quality 39 78.00%

    Price 1 2.00%

    Friends, relatives,

    neighbors

    10 20.00%

    Total 50 100.00%

    Motivating factors for purchasing branded products are given in Table 5 and fig 5. Among the

    respondents, the primary reason for purchase of branded products is Quality (78%), followed by

    advices from friends, relatives and neighbors (20%).

    ii. Information Sources for Branded Products

    Table 6: Sources of Information for Branded

    Products

    Respond

    ents*

    Percentage

    (%)

    Newspapers 13 26.00%

    Television 28 56.00%

    Internet 11 22.00%

    Friends, relatives,

    neighbors

    15 30.00%

    Total 50 100.00%

    * Multiple sources

    Fig 5: Motivators for purchase of Branded products

    Quality

    78%Price

    2%

    Friends,

    relatives,

    neighbors

    20%

    13

    28

    11

    15

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    Newspapers Television Internet Friends,

    relatives,

    neighbors

    Fig 6: Source of Information about Branded

    Products

    Respondents*

  • SIT Journal of Management

    Vol. 2. No. 2. December 2012. Pp. 122-138

    8 Krishnan, Pande, & Mule

    ISSN: 2278-9111

    Customers get information about the branded products from multiple sources. While television

    (56%) is the major source of information about branded products, the other sources are friends,

    relatives and neighbors (30%), newspapers (26%) and internet (22%).

    iii. Legal Protection for Branded Products

    Table 7: Legal Protection for Branded

    Products

    Legal

    Protection

    No. Percentage

    (%)

    Yes 35 70.00%

    No 0 0.00%

    Neutral 15 30.00%

    Total 50 100.00%

    From Table 7 and Fig 7, it can be seen that 70% of the respondents are affirmative to legal

    protection to branded products with the remaining 30% remaining neutral.

    iv. Company fulfilling customer expectations related to Branded Products

    Table 8: Fulfillment of Customer

    Expectations

    Customer

    Expectations

    No. Percentage

    (%)

    Yes 29 58.00%

    No 5 10.00%

    Neutral 16 32.00%

    Total 50 100.00%

    It is interesting to note that while 58% of the respondents stated that branded products fulfill their

    expectations, 42% were either neutral or say No to meeting their expectations.

    Fig 7: Should Branded products have

    Legal Protection

    Yes

    70%

    No

    0%

    Neutral

    30%

  • SIT Journal of Management

    Vol. 2. No. 2. December 2012. Pp. 122-138

    9 Krishnan, Pande, & Mule

    ISSN: 2278-9111

    v. Product Demand and Brand Extension

    Table 9: Product Demand and

    Brand Extension

    No. %

    Yes 26 52.00%

    No 8 16.00%

    Neutral 16 32.00%

    Total 50 100.00%

    Brand extension increases the life span of the branded products. 52% respondents agree that

    product demand increases with Brand additions while 16% respondent are of the opinion that

    brand does not lead to product demand. A significant 32% are neutral.

    vi. Unbranded Products

    Fig 9: Demand increase with extension

    Ye s

    5 2 %

    N o

    16 %

    N e utra l

    3 2 %

  • SIT Journal of Management

    Vol. 2. No. 2. December 2012. Pp. 122-138

    10 Krishnan, Pande, & Mule

    ISSN: 2278-9111

    Table 10: Unbranded Products

    Unbranded

    Products

    No. Percentage

    (%)

    Yes 11 22.00%

    No 31 62.00%

    Neutral 8 16.00%

    Total 50 100.00%

    22% of respondents purchase unbranded products while 62% do not. 16% were neutral. Not

    meeting the high expectations of the customers from branded products could be reason for

    consumers continuing to buy unbranded products.

    vii. Product Preference

    Table 11: Product Preference

    Preference of

    Products

    No. Percentage

    (%)

    Branded 43 86.00%

    Unbranded 7 14.00%

    Total 50 100.00%

    Ye s , 11

    No , 31

    Neutra l, 8

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    No. of Respondents

    Fig 10: Purchase of Unbranded Products

    Fig 11: Product Prefrence

    Branded

    86%

    Unbranded

    14%

  • SIT Journal of Management

    Vol. 2. No. 2. December 2012. Pp. 122-138

    11 Krishnan, Pande, & Mule

    ISSN: 2278-9111

    86% of the respondents prefer to buy branded products while 14% prefer unbranded products.

    viii. Factors Influencing Purchase of Unbranded Products

    Table 12: Motivators for Purchase of

    Unbranded Products

    No. Percentage

    (%)

    Easy

    availability

    23 46.00%

    Price 13 26.00%

    Quality 6 12.00%

    Any other

    specify

    8 16.00%

    Total 50 100.00%

    The two chief motivators for purchase of unbranded products were easy availability and

    price.

    ix. Comparison of the Factors Influencing Purchase of Branded and Unbranded Products

    Fig 12: Factors influencing purchase of

    unbranded products

    46%

    26%

    12%

    16%

    Eas y ava ilability P rice Quality Any o ther s pec ify

  • SIT Journal of Management

    Vol. 2. No. 2. December 2012. Pp. 122-138

    12 Krishnan, Pande, & Mule

    ISSN: 2278-9111

    Table 13: Normalized comparison of Branded

    and Unbranded Products

    Branded (%) Unbranded

    (%)

    Quality 78 12

    Price 2 26

    Friends,

    relatives,

    neighbors

    20

    0

    Easy

    availability

    0

    46

    Any other

    specify

    0

    16

    100 100

    Figs in percentages

    A comparison of the factors influencing purchase of branded and unbranded products indicate

    different motivators. While quality (78%) is the prime motivator for branded products, easy

    availability (46%) and price (26%) are the reasons for people going for unbranded products

    6.3 Discussions

    Many people interviewed have one or few unbranded products in their homes. Unbranded PCs

    are still popular in middle class and in affluent houses. Main attractions for unbranded home

    PCs are price and availability of freebies. Middle class consider the unbranded PC makers as

    their friendly neighborhood suppliers, who offer personalized support services. Cell phones are

    enticing people to the grey market. Many of them have one branded cell phone and for their

    spouse and children, they buy from the grey market. It is revealed during the personal interviews

    with respondent consumers that some of them buy branded bath soaps, but for washing utensils

    and clothes they buy unbranded or local brands. It also emerges from the field survey that while

    consumers prefer branded luxury products, for items of daily consumables they prefer unbranded

    products.

    78

    2

    20

    0 0

    12

    26

    0

    46

    16

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    Branded (%) Unbranded (%)

    Fig 13: Branded v/s Unbranded

    Motivators

    Quality

    P rice

    Friends , re la tives ,

    ne ighbo rs

    Eas y ava ilability

    Any o ther s pec ify

  • SIT Journal of Management

    Vol. 2. No. 2. December 2012. Pp. 122-138

    13 Krishnan, Pande, & Mule

    ISSN: 2278-9111

    Closer examination of the responses of customers to the questionnaire and personal interviews

    reveals the following:

    Quality is the prime determinant for purchase of branded products by consumers.

    Ease of availability and Price are the major motivators for purchasing unbranded

    products.

    Only 58% of the respondent customers felt that branded products fulfill their expectations;

    this could be one of the reasons for unbranded products continuing to be in demand.

    A significant 30% of respondent consumers feel legal protection is lacking for branded

    products.

    A significant segment of consumers (42% of the respondents) feel that branded products do

    not fulfill their expectations.

    Another interesting revelation from the field study is that brand extension does not lead to

    product demand.

    Company reputation helps sell branded products.

    Most of the retailers in both organized and unorganized segment stock and sell both branded

    and unbranded products.

    Retailers continue to offer discounts and free offers to sell unbranded products.

    Consumers said that unbranded products are priced lower.

    Not meeting the high expectations of the customers from branded products appears to be one

    reason for consumers continuing to buy unbranded products.

    7. Strategies

    Brand strategy facilitates marketing efforts. All channels of communication such as

    advertisement, public relations, internet and social media become in fructuous without a proper

  • SIT Journal of Management

    Vol. 2. No. 2. December 2012. Pp. 122-138

    14 Krishnan, Pande, & Mule

    ISSN: 2278-9111

    brand strategy. Clear and transparent communication is core to developing a brand strategy. It

    should help build relationship with the customers.

    There has to be holistic approach to marketing for brand building. It should encompass vision

    and mission of the organization, employee participation in brand building, media mix, and

    product and process innovations.

    Retailers and marketers should explore internet marketing tools such as blogs, social media,

    email marketing, webisodes, etc. With advancements in mobile technology and spread of mobile

    to rural hinterland, mobile marketing tools such as SMS, MMS, etc., can be used to directly

    reaching out to the customers.

    The above should complement the other media such as advertisements in newspapers, radio,

    television, public relations, event sponsorship, etc. Marketers should mix and match marketing

    efforts, create synergies and to maximize their individual and collective efforts so as to underpin

    the brand assurance.Brand building requires assessment of competition, consumer preferences,

    changes in demographics and brand positioning

    Marketers and retailers can use blue ocean strategy for brand building. They should identify or

    create products and services for which there is no direct competition. For making the blue ocean

    strategy more effective especially among the youths, retailers can use personalization tools such

    as social media e.g., Facebook, Twitter, Flicker, You Tube, etc. and webisodes. Careful analysis

    of customer reactions and responses and participation can help identify customer expectations

    and new marketing opportunities. These can lead to product enhancements and product

    innovations further strengthening blue ocean strategy.

    Webisodes is another source for generating new marketing opportunities as part of blue ocean

    strategy. It can be used for engaging readers, converting them into loyal customers and even as

    brand ambassadors.

  • SIT Journal of Management

    Vol. 2. No. 2. December 2012. Pp. 122-138

    15 Krishnan, Pande, & Mule

    ISSN: 2278-9111

    Other marketing tools for catching the eye of the customers and potential customers are email

    campaigns, interactive TV programs where customers are directly engaged in conversation and

    SMS competition.Brand management and strategy should encompass a proper mix and

    integration of the communication channels to enhance brand positioning and facilitate superior

    brand equity

    8. Conclusions

    Indian retail market is a great paradox where branded and unbranded products co-exist. Even

    shops in organized sector stock and sell unbranded products. While the Indian consumers are

    becoming brand aware and there is discerning shifts towards branded products, the demand for

    unbranded products and services are still significant. Indian consumers are still steeply ingrained

    in tradition and use traditional products and practices. Retailers, to withstand competition and

    sustain their bottom-line, peddle both branded and unbranded products on their shop floors to

    increase turnover and customer base. Consumers being price sensitive sometimes do not mind

    compromising on quality. This can become more pronounced during times of inflation.

    Indian consumers are maturing and retailers find it increasingly difficult to influence their

    purchase decisions merely with promotional offers. They would need to innovate. Retaining

    customers has become a challenge due to lifestyle changes, needs and values. Young customers

    are more demanding and do not mind experimenting and changing to new brands. Retailers

    therefore have to adopt a mix of marketing and promotional strategies leveraging available

    technology to withstand competition.

    9. Limitations of the Study

  • SIT Journal of Management

    Vol. 2. No. 2. December 2012. Pp. 122-138

    16 Krishnan, Pande, & Mule

    ISSN: 2278-9111

    The small sample size and sample design are limitations of this Study. The cost and time

    constraints are also limitations of this study. The study is confined to parts of Mumbai and Thane

    districts. So the generalization of conclusions of the study may not have universal applicability.

    But the findings give empirical inputs for a larger study across different market segments.

    10. Significance and Scope for Further Research

    The findings and conclusions of the study provide an experiential insight in to consumer

    behaviour in an economy that is in the midst of an upswing. Further the changing demography,

    socio-economic shifts and upwardly mobile younger generation with shifts in older generation

    attitude and thinking and behaviour as well signifies the importance of studies such as this to

    throw up the unexplained and unexplored aspects of consumer behaviour. Pan India research

    using SPSS and better statistical and sampling techniques would definitely help further

    understand the psyche of the Indian consumers who are maturing and becoming increasingly

    brand conscious. Consternations in the Indian market and the ripple effect of changes across the

    globe and entry of global brands in to India are reasons enough for further scope for detailed

    studies into various aspects of behaviour of Indian consumers.

    The research of this nature would help in brand strategy and positioning especially in the vast

    expanding rural areas where there is pronounced tilt towards local or unbranded products. The

    challenge before the manufacturers and marketers is making consumers purchase brands instead

    of products. Their key task is to convert consumer preference and loyalty towards brands.

    References

    Vijaya Kumar G, Shanthini B N, (2011), A Brand is For Ever, Marketing Mastermind, May 2011, pp 13-16.

    Pradhumn Kumar, (2011) Role of Online social Networking sites in Branding, Marketing Mastermid, May 2011, pp 22-25.

  • SIT Journal of Management

    Vol. 2. No. 2. December 2012. Pp. 122-138

    17 Krishnan, Pande, & Mule

    ISSN: 2278-9111

    Senthil Nathan C, (2010), Holistic Marketing Approach for Brand building, Marketing Mastermind, November 2010, pp 48-51.

    Harish B, (2008), The anatomy of Rebranding, Marketing Mastermind, September 2008, pp 26-31.

    Ghosal S N (2009), Innovations in Advertising Creating Added Values in Advertising, Marketing Mastermind, November, pp 41-44.

    Mrudula G P, (2009), Advocacy Advertising Generating Sales by Promoting an Opinion, Marketing Mastermind, January, pp 63-66.

    Roy S, Lall S, (2008), The New Humour in Advertising, Marketing Mastermind, September, pp 45-48

    Srivastava M K, Kochar B, (2009), Women in Indian Advertising From Lalita to Lolita, Marketing Mastermind, July, pp 29-32.

    Dadhal C H (2012), An Empirical Study of the Impact of Demographic and Socio-Economic Factors on Brand Loyalty, Journal of Management Outlook, Vol.2, No.1, Jan-June 2012, Pp 46-57.

    Cunningham R M, (1956), Brand Loyalty, what, Where and How Much?, Harvard Business Review, Vol.34, Jan / Feb.

    Cunningham S M, (1967), Perceived Risk and Brand Loyalty in Donald Coased Risk Taking Information Handling in Consumer Behaviour, Harvard University Press.

    Goldman A, (1976), Do Lower Income Consumers have a more restricted shopping scope?, Journal of Marketing, Vol.40, January

    Albert, Noel, Merunka, Dwight and Vallette-Florance, Pierre (2008), When Consumers Love their Brands: Exploring the Concepts and its Dimensions, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 61, No.10, pp 1062-1075.

    Bigne, J Enrique, Matilda, anna S and Andreu Louisa (2008), The Impact of Experiential Consumption Cognitions and Emotions on Behavioural Intentions, Journal of Services marketing, Vol.22, No.4/5, pp 303-315.

    Keller K J, (1993), conceptualizing, Measuring and Managing Consumer-based Brand Equity, Journal of Marketing, Vol.57, No.1, pp 1-27.

    Krishnamurthy, Lakshman and Raj, S P (1991), An Empirical analysis of the Relationship between Brand Loyalty and Consumer Price Elasticity, Marketing Science, Vol.10, No.2, pp 172-183.

    Lakshman, Nandani (2004), Wooing Generation Next, Business Standard, June 12, http://www.business-standard.com/India/news/wooing-generation-next/152793/.

  • SIT Journal of Management

    Vol. 2. No. 2. December 2012. Pp. 122-138

    18 Krishnan, Pande, & Mule

    ISSN: 2278-9111

    Chaudhari, Arjun & Holbrook, Morris B, (2001), The Chain Effects from Brand Trust and Brand Affect to Brand Performance: The Role of Brand Loyalty, Journal of Marketing, Vol.65, No.2, pp 81-93.

    Ewing, Michael, T., (2000), Brand and Retail Loyalty: Past Behaviour and Future Intentions, Journal of Product and Brand Management, Vol.9, No.2, pp 120-127.

    Huber, Frank, Hermann, Andreas (2001), achieving Brand and Dealer Loyalty: The case of the automotive industry, The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, Vol.11, No.2, pp 97-122.

    Lou, Geok Theng, Lee, Sook Han, (1999), Consumers Trust in a Brand and the Link to brand Loyalty, Journal of Market Focused Management, Vol.4, pp 341-370.

    Newman, J.W., Werbel, R.A., (1973), Multivariate Analysis of Brand Loyalty for major household appliances, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.10, No.4, --404-409.

    Reynolds, K., Arnold, M., (2000), Consumer Loyalty to the salesperson and the store: Examining relationship customers inan upscale retail context, Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, Vol.20, No.4, pp.89-97.