contact: nadim.ahmad@oecd

11
OECD WORKSHOP ON THE MEASUREMENT OF HIGH-GROWTH ENTERPRISES SYNTHESIS OF COUNTRY RETURNS Paris November 19, 2007 Contact: [email protected]

Upload: ila-golden

Post on 31-Dec-2015

90 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

OECD WORKSHOP ON THE MEASUREMENT OF HIGH-GROWTH ENTERPRISES SYNTHESIS OF COUNTRY RETURNS Paris November 19, 2007. Contact: [email protected]. 8 countries. Can, Dnk, Fin, Ita, Ltv, Spa, Swe and USA. Providing a variety of information. Thresholds. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Contact: nadim.ahmad@oecd

OECD WORKSHOP ON THE MEASUREMENT OF HIGH-GROWTH ENTERPRISES

SYNTHESIS OF COUNTRY RETURNS

Paris November 19, 2007

Contact: [email protected]

Page 2: Contact: nadim.ahmad@oecd

8 countries

• Can, Dnk, Fin, Ita, Ltv, Spa, Swe and

USA.

• Providing a variety of information

Page 3: Contact: nadim.ahmad@oecd

Figure 1: High Growth Rates - Employment, % of all enterprises with 10 or more employees

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

Canada Denmark Finland Italy Latvia Spain Sweden US BLS

15%

20%

25%

30%

40%

Page 4: Contact: nadim.ahmad@oecd

Figure 2: High Growth Rates - Turnover, % of all enterprises with 10 or more employees

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

Canada Denmark Finland Italy Latvia Sweden

15%

20%

25%

30%

40%

Page 5: Contact: nadim.ahmad@oecd

Figure 3: Gazelles - Employment, % of all enterprises with 10 or more employees

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

Canada Denmark Finland Sweden US BLS US Census Italy Latvia Spain

15%

20%

25%

30%

40%

5 years or less at the beginning of the 3 year period

5 years or less at the end of the 3 year period

Page 6: Contact: nadim.ahmad@oecd

Figure 4: Gazelles - Turnover, % of all enterprises with 10 or more employees

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

Denmark Italy Latvia Sweden

15%

20%

25%

30%

40%

5 years or less at the beginning of the reporting period

5 years or less at the end of the reporting period

Page 7: Contact: nadim.ahmad@oecd

Thresholds• Core rates provide for good relevant percentages 3-5%

HG, 1-2% Gazelles (5 at beginning) or 0.5-1%( 5 at

end). Higher thresholds = increase in non-disclosure

Denmark Finland Latvia Spain Sweden

Growth Threshold

non-disclosive

cells HG rate

Non-disclosive

cells HG rate

non-disclosive

cells HG rate

non-disclosive

cells HG rate

non-disclosive

cells HG rate

15% 11 5.0 5 8.1 20% 6 3.3 12 3.0 22 4.6 5 5.0 12 4.0 25% 19 1.9 5 3.2 30% 23 1.3 6 2.2 40% 31 0.7 6 1.2

Denmark Latvia Spain Sweden

Growth Threshold

non-disclosive

Gaz rate

Non-disclosive

Gaz rate

non-disclosive

Gaz rate

non-disclosive

Gaz rate

15% 7 1.2 20% 20 1.3 42 0.9 8 0.9 18 1.8 25% 10 0.6 30% 11 0.5 40% 13 0.3

Page 8: Contact: nadim.ahmad@oecd

Turnover and Employment • Higher figures for turnover, about twice but relatively

good correlation in high-growth sectors

Denmark 2000-03

R² = 0.793

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

35.0

0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0

High growth rate - employment

Hig

h gr

owth

rat

e - t

urno

ver

Page 9: Contact: nadim.ahmad@oecd

Size thresholdTable 4: High-Growth rates broken down by size class –

Denominator = all enterprises with 10 or more employees Employment Turnover

Size threshold Denmark Canada Spain Sweden Denmark Canada Sweden 1+ 45.7 80.7 73.7 44.6 89.8 2+ 19.1 31.2 27.8 27.4 38.6 5+ 7.0 12.7 11.1 9.5 13.0 25.6 15.7 10+ 3.3 5.9 5.0 4.0 6.6 10.7 7.4 15+ 2.2 3.2 2.4 4.4 4.7 20+ 1.6 2.5 2.2 1.7 3.1 4.3 3.3 50+ 0.6 1.2 100+ 0.2 0.3

Page 10: Contact: nadim.ahmad@oecd

Recommendations• Continue with current definitions – including gazelles 5

or less at end of reporting period

• Clarify position on denominator (population of survivors

at end of reporting period).

• Complementary measure for gazelles, reflecting all

enterprises 5 or less with 17+ employees.

Page 11: Contact: nadim.ahmad@oecd

Issues for discussion• Happy with the recommendations?

• Should gazelles refer to 5 at the end or the beginning?

• Target measures - with or without mergers etc?

• Denominators – population of survivors? Or population

at beginning of reporting period – (bearing in mind the

complications that classification changes cause).

• Enterprise versus Establishment?