[email protected] the building block approach – a tool for regulatory and supervisory reforms for...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Contact@e-mfp.eu The Building Block Approach – A tool for regulatory and supervisory reforms for microfinance European MF week 2012, Luxembourg,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022072017/56649efd5503460f94c11040/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
[email protected] www.e-mfp.eu
The Building Block Approach – A tool for regulatory and supervisory reforms
for microfinance
European MF week 2012, Luxembourg, 16th November
GIZ Financial Systems Development
Rainer Schliwa and Florian Henrich
![Page 2: Contact@e-mfp.eu The Building Block Approach – A tool for regulatory and supervisory reforms for microfinance European MF week 2012, Luxembourg,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022072017/56649efd5503460f94c11040/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
[email protected] www.e-mfp.eu
GIZ’s role in the implementation of regulatory and supervisory reforms
Support partners in developing supervisory capacity Act as a facilitator and provider of technical
assistance No off-the-shelf solutions Understand the local context Build ownership
Long-term commitment is key
![Page 3: Contact@e-mfp.eu The Building Block Approach – A tool for regulatory and supervisory reforms for microfinance European MF week 2012, Luxembourg,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022072017/56649efd5503460f94c11040/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
[email protected] www.e-mfp.eu
Countries vary in terms of stages of regulation & supervision Draft rules may not be enacted; law may not be in place Implementation of international standards (Basel I, II, Basel Core Principles) Limits on permitted products / services Financial institutions may be regulated by different entities Regulator may view microfinance not as primary responsibility Regulator may lack expertise and understanding to effectively identify, assess
and manage microfinance specific risks Regulators may still be largely unfamiliar with non-prudential risks (e.g.
Consumer Protection) Regulatory actions may not be in line with the market (e.g. interest rate caps) Regulator may be risk averse to financial innovations
Need for tailor-made solutions according to country context
![Page 4: Contact@e-mfp.eu The Building Block Approach – A tool for regulatory and supervisory reforms for microfinance European MF week 2012, Luxembourg,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022072017/56649efd5503460f94c11040/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
[email protected] www.e-mfp.eu
Supervisory capacities should follow the development path of the Financial System
![Page 5: Contact@e-mfp.eu The Building Block Approach – A tool for regulatory and supervisory reforms for microfinance European MF week 2012, Luxembourg,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022072017/56649efd5503460f94c11040/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
[email protected] www.e-mfp.eu
Supervisory Capacity
+
FSD stage Standards
Wholesale approach Incremental approach
Regulatory Standards
Supervisory Capacity
+FSD stage
Balance regulatory standards and supervisory capacity
RegulatoryStandards
Supervisory Capacity
+FSD stage
Imbalance can lead to financial sector instability
![Page 6: Contact@e-mfp.eu The Building Block Approach – A tool for regulatory and supervisory reforms for microfinance European MF week 2012, Luxembourg,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022072017/56649efd5503460f94c11040/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
[email protected] www.e-mfp.eu
“Building Block” Approach – a method to prioritize, sequence and adapt international standards to local context
Background: While international best practice of supervisory standards exists, there is a need to provide guidance on how to adapt those to the local context.
1. Identify thematic blocks of the Basel Core Principles, and/or Basel I – III and cluster them into thematic categories
2. Sequence those thematic blocks in accordance with financial sector development
![Page 7: Contact@e-mfp.eu The Building Block Approach – A tool for regulatory and supervisory reforms for microfinance European MF week 2012, Luxembourg,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022072017/56649efd5503460f94c11040/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
[email protected] www.e-mfp.eu
Step 1: Identify thematic blocks (“Building Blocks”) of the Basel Core Principles and cluster them into thematic categories
3: Licensing Criteria
7: Risk ManagementProcess
11: Exposure to Related Parties
13: Market Risk
2: Permissible Activities
1: Objectives, Independence, Powers, Transparency, and Cooperation
8: Credit Risk
6: Capital Adequacy
5: Major Acquisitions
4: Significant Transfer of Ownership
12: Country risk and transfer risk
9: Problem Assets, Provisions, and Reserves
15: Operational Risk
14: Liquidity Risk
19: Supervisory Approach
18: Abuse of Financial Services
17: Internal Supervision/Auditing
22: Accounting and Disclosure
21: Supervisory Reporting
25: Home-Host Relationships
10: Large Exposure Limits
16: Interest rate risk in banking book
20: Supervisory Techniques
23: Corrective and Remedial Powers
24: Consolidated Supervision
Licensing, definitions and preconditions
Basel Core Principles
3. Supervisory processes
1. Licensing, definitions
and preconditions
2. Setup of supervisory institutions
4. Risk Management
Thematic Categories, which cover the process of building supervisory capacity
![Page 8: Contact@e-mfp.eu The Building Block Approach – A tool for regulatory and supervisory reforms for microfinance European MF week 2012, Luxembourg,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022072017/56649efd5503460f94c11040/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
[email protected] www.e-mfp.eu
Time
Foundation Advanced Sophisticationt0
5: Licensing Criteria
4: Permissible Activities
1: Responsibilities, objectives and powers
16: Capital Adequacy
Basel I
8: Super-visoryApproach
10: Super-visoryReporting
9: Super-visoryTechniques
11: Corrective and sanctioningPowers
7: Major Acqui-sitions
6: Transfer of significant Ownership 28:
Disclosure and Transparency
Disclosure Require-ments
Capital require-ments
Internal capital adequacy
assessment process (ICAAP)
Super-visory
review and evaluation process (SREP)
22: Market Risk
17: Credit Risk (incl. 18, 19, 20)
25: Operational Risk
24: Liquidity Risk
13: Home-Host Relation-ships
12: Consoli-dated Supervision
29: Abuse of Financial Services
21: Country risk and transfer risk
Basel Core Principles (2012)Basel IBasel II
Lic
ensi
ng
, d
efin
itio
ns
and
pre
con
dit
ion
sR
isk
Man
agem
ent
Set
up
of
sup
er-
viso
ryin
sti-
tuti
on
s
Su
per
viso
ryp
roce
sses
Financial Sophistication
BCP - 2012
26. Internal Control
15: Risk Management Process
Step 2: Logical sequencingaccording to the stage of financial sector development
![Page 9: Contact@e-mfp.eu The Building Block Approach – A tool for regulatory and supervisory reforms for microfinance European MF week 2012, Luxembourg,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022072017/56649efd5503460f94c11040/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
[email protected] www.e-mfp.eu
Considerations for prioritization: Balance financial stability and development concerns (e.g. financial access / financial inclusion)Consider regulator’s reform capacity (e.g. central bank)Consider changes in the independence of the regulator
Process: Consultative: stakeholder discussions should involve the regulator, industry associations, government, and donorsShould be in line with the development of the sector (e.g. new risks, new topics – take account of inherent sector dynamics)
Success factors and challenges:Strong commitment of the partnerLocal presence of the facilitatorInconsistency of particular interests
Conclusion I
![Page 10: Contact@e-mfp.eu The Building Block Approach – A tool for regulatory and supervisory reforms for microfinance European MF week 2012, Luxembourg,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022072017/56649efd5503460f94c11040/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
[email protected] www.e-mfp.eu
Supporting infrastructure and conditions to complement effective supervision – some examples
Financial Stability
Stable macroeconomic environment
Credit reference bureaus
Deposit insurance schemes
Effective market discipline
Conclusion II