contaminant removal from acidic mine pit water via in situ...

8
Contaminant removal from acidic mine pit water via in situ hydrotalcite formation Grant B. Douglas CSIRO Land and Water, Centre for Environment and Life Sciences, Private Bag 5, Wembley, 6913 WA, Australia article info Article history: Editorial handling by M. Kersten abstract Remediation of 56 ML of acidic, contaminant-laden Baal Gammon mine pit water was undertaken using in situ hydrotalcite formation. The pit water composition was modified via the addition of MgCl 2 6H 2 O to form a 2.5:1 M 2+ :M 3+ metal ion ratio followed by the addition of NaOH to increase the pH 10 to induce spontaneous hydrotalcite precipitation. As a result of the in situ hydrotalcite precipitation a broad spec- trum of elements of environmental concern including Al, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, In, Mn, Mo, Ni, V and Zn were removed from solution. Significantly, an ore grade hydrotalcite precipitate containing Cu (8.0 ± 1.0%) and Zn (3.9 ± 0.5%) was produced directly from the mine pit water column allowing for potential recovery of valuable metals to offset remediation costs. The final water quality produced after in situ remediation was of a simple Na–Cl–SO 4 type. Ó 2014 Published by Elsevier Ltd. 1. Introduction Lime- or limestone-based neutralisation has long been the treatment of choice of acidic tailings, acid mine drainage and mine pit wastewaters (e.g. Akcil and Koldas, 2006; Hedin et al., 1994; Johnson and Hallberg, 2005; Watten et al., 2005). While this approach is often well suited to the attenuation of acidity, the use of lime has been difficult to implement at some mine sites for a number of reasons including variable quality of the lime, proximity to the end use, and the frequent presence of unreacted lime after neutralisation due to partial loss of neutralisation effi- ciency due to armouring (e.g. Cravotta and Trahan, 1999; Hammerstrom et al., 2003; Santomartino and Webb, 2007; Ziemkiewicz et al., 1997) giving rise to the potential for unin- tended, latent reactions in the sludge or tailings. Significantly, large volumes of gypsum are often produced that require mechanical dewatering, and where necessary, transporta- tion to final voids to allow the resumption of in-pit mining or direct access to initiate remediation or final closure activities. Thus, the management of produced lime sludge over both the short and longer term may add substantial operational costs over that of the primary neutralisation step. In addition, lime production via lime- stone calcination is associated with large greenhouse gas (CO 2 ) emissions. Research undertaken by CSIRO over the past seven years on the neutralisation of mine pit waters or In-Situ Recovery (ISR) barren lixiviant has highlighted the possibility that the addition of reagents other than lime could provide a pathway for effective neutralisation and contaminant removal (Douglas, 2006, 2009). In particular, the formation of hydrotalcite as a repository for a suite of cations and anions has been extensively investigated (Douglas et al., 2010, 2011, 2014). 1.1. Hydrotalcite formation and composition Hydrotalcites are a class of layered double hydroxide materials characterised by positively charged mixed metal hydroxide layers separated by interlayers containing water molecules and exchangeable anions (Cavani et al., 1991; Miyata, 1983; Shin et al., 1996; Ulibarri et al., 2001). Hydrotalcites have the general formula: M (1 x) 2+ M x 3+ (OH) 2 A n y H 2 O, where M 2+ and M 3+ are divalent and trivalent metal ions, respectively, x denotes the proportion of the total trivalent metal ions, A n is an anion of n-negative charge, and y denotes the presence of interlayer water. Typically, M 2+ :M 3+ ratios in hydrotalcites vary from 2:1 to 3:1. A suite of other cations, including Ni, Zn, Mn, Ca, Cr and La and anions such major anions (SO 4 2 , HCO 3 ) or oxyanions (e.g. CrO 4 2 , UO 2 2+ ) may occupy the hydrotalcite structure (Behrens et al., 2010; Cavani et al., 1991; Miyata, 1983; Seida and Nakano, 2002; Vucelic et al., 1997). It is this inherent capacity to substitute a range of anions and cations into the hydrotalcite structure when formed in-situ that can be productively exploited to remove contaminants from mine and other wastewaters. In addition to the potential for broad spectrum removal of contaminants as elucidated above, other specific advantages of http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2014.09.005 0883-2927/Ó 2014 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Tel.: +61 8 9333 6131. E-mail address: [email protected] Applied Geochemistry 51 (2014) 15–22 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Applied Geochemistry journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/apgeochem

Upload: others

Post on 24-Jun-2020

9 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Contaminant removal from acidic mine pit water via in situ ...virtualcurtain.com.au/.../2014/03/Baal-Gammon-Applied-Geochemistry-Elsevier-81014.pdfContaminant removal from acidic mine

Applied Geochemistry 51 (2014) 15–22

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Applied Geochemistry

journal homepage: www.elsevier .com/ locate/apgeochem

Contaminant removal from acidic mine pit water via in situ hydrotalciteformation

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2014.09.0050883-2927/� 2014 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

⇑ Tel.: +61 8 9333 6131.E-mail address: [email protected]

Grant B. Douglas ⇑CSIRO Land and Water, Centre for Environment and Life Sciences, Private Bag 5, Wembley, 6913 WA, Australia

a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t

Article history:

Editorial handling by M. Kersten

Remediation of 56 ML of acidic, contaminant-laden Baal Gammon mine pit water was undertaken usingin situ hydrotalcite formation. The pit water composition was modified via the addition of MgCl2�6H2O toform a 2.5:1 M2+:M3+ metal ion ratio followed by the addition of NaOH to increase the pH 10 to inducespontaneous hydrotalcite precipitation. As a result of the in situ hydrotalcite precipitation a broad spec-trum of elements of environmental concern including Al, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, In, Mn, Mo, Ni, V and Zn wereremoved from solution. Significantly, an ore grade hydrotalcite precipitate containing Cu (8.0 ± 1.0%) andZn (3.9 ± 0.5%) was produced directly from the mine pit water column allowing for potential recovery ofvaluable metals to offset remediation costs. The final water quality produced after in situ remediation wasof a simple Na–Cl–SO4 type.

� 2014 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

1. Introduction

Lime- or limestone-based neutralisation has long been thetreatment of choice of acidic tailings, acid mine drainage and minepit wastewaters (e.g. Akcil and Koldas, 2006; Hedin et al., 1994;Johnson and Hallberg, 2005; Watten et al., 2005). While thisapproach is often well suited to the attenuation of acidity, theuse of lime has been difficult to implement at some mine sitesfor a number of reasons including variable quality of the lime,proximity to the end use, and the frequent presence of unreactedlime after neutralisation due to partial loss of neutralisation effi-ciency due to armouring (e.g. Cravotta and Trahan, 1999;Hammerstrom et al., 2003; Santomartino and Webb, 2007;Ziemkiewicz et al., 1997) giving rise to the potential for unin-tended, latent reactions in the sludge or tailings.

Significantly, large volumes of gypsum are often produced thatrequire mechanical dewatering, and where necessary, transporta-tion to final voids to allow the resumption of in-pit mining ordirect access to initiate remediation or final closure activities. Thus,the management of produced lime sludge over both the short andlonger term may add substantial operational costs over that of theprimary neutralisation step. In addition, lime production via lime-stone calcination is associated with large greenhouse gas (CO2)emissions.

Research undertaken by CSIRO over the past seven years on theneutralisation of mine pit waters or In-Situ Recovery (ISR) barren

lixiviant has highlighted the possibility that the addition ofreagents other than lime could provide a pathway for effectiveneutralisation and contaminant removal (Douglas, 2006, 2009).In particular, the formation of hydrotalcite as a repository for asuite of cations and anions has been extensively investigated(Douglas et al., 2010, 2011, 2014).

1.1. Hydrotalcite formation and composition

Hydrotalcites are a class of layered double hydroxide materialscharacterised by positively charged mixed metal hydroxide layersseparated by interlayers containing water molecules andexchangeable anions (Cavani et al., 1991; Miyata, 1983; Shinet al., 1996; Ulibarri et al., 2001). Hydrotalcites have the generalformula: M(1�x)

2+ Mx3+ (OH)2 An� y H2O, where M2+ and M3+ are

divalent and trivalent metal ions, respectively, x denotes theproportion of the total trivalent metal ions, An� is an anion ofn-negative charge, and y denotes the presence of interlayer water.Typically, M2+:M3+ ratios in hydrotalcites vary from 2:1 to 3:1. Asuite of other cations, including Ni, Zn, Mn, Ca, Cr and La and anionssuch major anions (SO4

2�, HCO3�) or oxyanions (e.g. CrO4

2�, UO22+)

may occupy the hydrotalcite structure (Behrens et al., 2010;Cavani et al., 1991; Miyata, 1983; Seida and Nakano, 2002;Vucelic et al., 1997). It is this inherent capacity to substitute arange of anions and cations into the hydrotalcite structure whenformed in-situ that can be productively exploited to removecontaminants from mine and other wastewaters.

In addition to the potential for broad spectrum removal ofcontaminants as elucidated above, other specific advantages of

Page 2: Contaminant removal from acidic mine pit water via in situ ...virtualcurtain.com.au/.../2014/03/Baal-Gammon-Applied-Geochemistry-Elsevier-81014.pdfContaminant removal from acidic mine

16 G.B. Douglas / Applied Geochemistry 51 (2014) 15–22

hydrotalcite formation include: rapid kinetics of formation, theability to entrain particulate or colloidal material when formedin-situ, and the prospect of further stabilisation via the additionof interlayer silica which may polymerize after addition (Depegeet al., 1996) or calcination to form a spinel.

1.2. Hydrotalcite formation in the context of Baal Gammon mine pitwater neutralisation and contaminant removal

A common feature of acid mine wastewaters, often overlookedin analysis of potential neutralisation and contaminant removaloptions, is the frequent predominance of divalent (M2+) and triva-lent cations (M3+), particularly Mg and Al, as a consequence of par-tial decomposition of gangue minerals (e.g. from aluminosilicateminerals) during in-pit wall rock leaching or ore processing.

Given the presence of substantial Mg and Al in the Baal Gam-mon mine pit water (Table 1), an opportunity existed to exploit,and in effect, work in harmony with the prevailing pit water com-position. Thus M2+ cations (Mg + Cu + Zn), coupled with M3+ cat-ions (Al + Fe) in an appropriate ratio, form the basis ofhydrotalcite precipitation. With a pre-treatment M2+:M3+ ratio ofca. 0.79 this approach focused on the sequential addition of Mgand NaOH to the Baal Gammon mine pit lake to;

(1) Modify the prevailing M2+:M3+ ratio to 2.5 which was withinthe known stability range of hydrotalcites.

(2) Attenuate the existing acidity to facilitate the in-situ precip-itation of hydrotalcites as a major secondary mineral.

2. Baal Gammon mine and pit characteristics

2.1. Baal Gammon regional and mine pit geology

The Baal Gammon minesite is located approximately 7 km fromHerberton and a further 20 km from the regional centre of Ather-ton in far north Queensland (Fig. 1). Tin and base metals weremined intermittently in the period 1967 to 1983 (Anon, 2013).

The Baal Gammon mineralisation is hosted by Hodgkinson For-mation sediments that have been invaded by a porphyritic sillwhich hosts both Cu, Ag and lesser In within a series of sulphideminerals including pyrrhotite, chalcopyrite, arsenopyrite and les-

Table 1Summary of pH, electrical conductivity (EC, mS/cm) and major and trace element composiand dissolved values for release of treated pit water. Figures in italics denote analytical d

Analyte Pre-treatment Post-treatment surface Post-tre

pH 2.9 9.2 9.2EC 2533 1624 1624Na 34 650 640K 8 18.5 19Ca 130 123 127Mg 70 57 59Cl 12 380 380SO4 1247 1359 1401F 59 33 35Al 70 0.06 0.06As 0.04 <0.005 <0.005Cd 0.3 0.001 0.001Co 0.54 <0.005 <0.005Cu 40 <0.005 <0.005In 0.51 <0.05 <0.05Fe 59 0.04 <0.05Mn 16 0.01 0.04Ni 0.36 <0.005 <0.005Pb 0.13 <0.005 <0.005Si 60 1.3 1.3Zn 22 <0.005 <0.005

na – Not analysed.

ser pyrite. The Sn occurs in both with a tourmaline-cassiterite asso-ciation and also in Sn sulphides such as stannites.

The Baal Gammon mine pit hosts a resource of 2.8Mt @ 1% Cu,40 g/t Ag, 0.2% Sn and 39 g/t In. A high grade zone identified withinthe resource consists of 829kt @ 2.5% Cu, 96 g/t Ag, 0.4% Sn and96 g/t In (Anon, 2013). Active mining of the Baal Gammon pit lastoccurred in 2012. The in-situ treatment of the acidic mine pit waterwas proposed to allow for a resumption of mining in early 2014.

The Baal Gammon mine pit is an irregular ovoid shape with longaxes of approximately 120 m and 80 m. At 56 ML pit volume, themaximum depth is approximately nine metres in a small depres-sion just off centre of the pit, while elsewhere, due to its mostly flatfloor, the pit depth mostly varies between three and six metres.

The mine pit and its immediate catchment have an area ofapproximately three hectares. The immediate pit surrounds consistof rock bunds and access roads with a sand covered pad for loca-tion of pumps, and tanks used to deliver reagents and as the sitefor a mobile Reverse Osmosis (RO plant) used to remove residualsalts remaining after in-situ remediation and prior to filtrate dis-charge to an adjacent creek. Portions of the pit walls have charac-teristic blue malachite colour due to oxidation of the chalcopyritemineralisation. Small groundwater seepages and white efflores-cences were also observable indicating transport of saline, possiblyacidic groundwater from old workings above the pit.

3. Methods

3.1. Baal Gammon mine pit treatment

Treatment of the 56 ML of solute in the Baal Gammon pit com-menced on 31/10/2013 and was completed on 15/11/2013 with in-situ monitoring occurring from 29/10/2013 until 19/11/2013. Dur-ing the treatment, emplaced multi-parameter sondes (YSI/ylem6930 V2) containing individual temperature, pH, electrical conduc-tivity (EC), redox (Eh), dissolved oxygen and turbidity probes werepresent at depths of approximately 2 m and 6 m. The probes col-lected over 6000 data points at 5 min intervals allowing near toreal time monitoring of pit water column physico-chemicalconditions.

Initially 58 tonnes of MgCl2�6H2O were added to the pit viadissolution of 5 tonne batches in 50,000 L tanks of pit water. After

tion (mg/L) for pit water, surface and bottom compositions produced after treatment,etection limits.

atment bottom Post-reverse osmosis Water release criteria

7 6.0–7.589 25014 –0.22 –0.67 –0.35 –17 –8.4 10000.97 20.007 1.3<0.003 0.013<0.0001 0.0002<0.001 0.00280.001 0.003<0.05 –<0.005 0.3<0.005 1.9<0.001 0.011<0.001 0.0034na –0.007 0.008

Page 3: Contaminant removal from acidic mine pit water via in situ ...virtualcurtain.com.au/.../2014/03/Baal-Gammon-Applied-Geochemistry-Elsevier-81014.pdfContaminant removal from acidic mine

Fig. 1. Location of Baal Gammon minesite.

G.B. Douglas / Applied Geochemistry 51 (2014) 15–22 17

dissolution of each batch, the dissolved MgCl2�6H2O was sprayedonto the pit surface using a pontoon mounted sprinkler systemwhich was periodically moved via attached cables to ensure aneven distribution over the pit surface. In addition, large pumpslocated on the pit edge (pumping capacity of 11 ML/day, or approx-imately 20% of the pit volume) were also used concurrently toassist in circulating the pit solute to enhance mixing. After additionof the MgCl2�6H2O, the pit water was circulated for almost threedays. Thereafter, 132 tonnes of 50% w/w NaOH was added from1000 L Intermediate Bulk Containers (IBC) via gravity feed to aneight outlet manifold discharging approximately 3 m below pitlake surface. During this time continuous bottom to surface recir-culation via multiple collection and re-injection points was main-tained. An additional of 57 tonnes of 50% NaOH diluted to 1% w/wwas then added to immediate subsurface via a ring shaped mani-fold of 100 m circumference (Supplementary Fig. 1). Continuousbottom to surface recirculation via multiple collection and re-injection points was then continued for a further five days.

3.2. Chemical analyses

3.2.1. Major and trace element analysis of Baal Gammon mine pitwaters

Mine pit water samples collected pre- and post-treatment weresubmitted to SGS Environmental, Cairns, Queensland and/or theChemCentre, Waterford, Western Australia. All analytical methods(e.g. pH, EC nutrient species and alkalinity) were based onAmerican Public Health Association (APHA) (2005).

3.2.2. X-ray fluorescence (XRF) precipitate analysis – fusionHydrotalcite precipitate analysis using XRF for major elements

(wt.% oxides): SiO2, Al2O3, Fe2O3, MnO, MgO, CaO, Na2O, K2O,TiO2, P2O5, SO3, and trace elements (lg/g): Ba, Ce, Cl, Cr, Co, Cu,Ga, La, Ni, Nb, Pb, Rb, S, Sr, V, Y, Zn, and Zr using fused glass discs

(Norrish and Chappell, 1977), at CSIRO Land and Water, Adelaide.Dried samples (105 �C) of 1 g were accurately weighed with 4 gof 12:22 Li tetra/metaborate flux, fused at 1,050 �C in a Pt/Au cru-cible for 20 min then poured into a 32 mm Pt/Au heated mould andcooled quickly over compressed air. The resulting glass disks wereanalysed on a Philips PW1480 wavelength dispersive XRF systemusing a dual anode Sc/Mo tube and CSIRO algorithms.

3.2.3. X-ray fluorescence (XRF) precipitate analysis – pressed powdersSamples were analysed by XRF for major elements (wt.% ele-

ment): Si, Al, Fe, Mn, Mg, Ca, Na, K, Ti, P, S, and trace elements(lg/g): Ag, As, Ba, Bi, Br, Cd, Ce, Co, Cr, Cs, Cu, Ga, Ge, Hf, Hg, I,In, La, Mo, Ni, Nb, Nd, Pb, Pr, Rb, Sb, Se, Sm, Sn, Sr, Ta, Te, Th, Tl,U, V, W, Y, Yb, Zn, and Zr using pressed powders with 4 g of eachsample was accurately weighed with 1 g of Licowax binder andshaken for 30 s and pressed to 10 t with a boric acid backing. Thepellets were analysed on a Spectro X-Lab 2000 energy dispersiveXRF system using a Pd X-ray tube with secondary excitationtargets.

3.2.4. Sediment fractionationBottom sediment – unfractionated, Suspended sediment – unfrac-

tionated: One gram subsamples were micronized for 10 min underethanol, oven dried at 60 �C then mixed in an agate mortar andpestle.

Bottom sediment 0.2–2 lm fraction and < 0.2 lm fraction: Boththe 0.2–2 lm and <0.2 lm fractions were separated using asequential centrifugation steps (5000 g for up to two hours), addi-tion of Calgon� (0.25 wt.% Na hexametaphosphate and 0.25 wt.%Na carbonate solution) as a dispersant, and decantation of thesupernatant. Sonication, washing with distilled water and re-cen-trifugation was used to remove dissolved salts. Both fractionatedsamples were dried at 60 �C prior to analysis.

Page 4: Contaminant removal from acidic mine pit water via in situ ...virtualcurtain.com.au/.../2014/03/Baal-Gammon-Applied-Geochemistry-Elsevier-81014.pdfContaminant removal from acidic mine

18 G.B. Douglas / Applied Geochemistry 51 (2014) 15–22

3.2.5. X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysisFinely powdered samples or sample fractions were lightly back

pressed into stainless steel holders. The XRD patterns wererecorded in steps of 0.05� 2h with a 0.5 s count time per step witha PANalytical X’Pert Pro microprocessor-controlled diffractometerusing Co Ka radiation, automatic divergence slit, graphite post-dif-fraction monochromator and X’Celerator fast Si strip detector.

4. Results

4.1. Pit water characteristics – physico-chemical parameters

Monitoring of the Baal Gammon pit water indicated substantialvariability in a range of physico-chemical parameters as recordedby in-situ sondes in the 22 day period from 29/10/2013 to 19/11/2013. Individual parameters are shown in Fig. 2 and are discussedbelow:

Temperature (�C): Surface and bottom temperatures displayed adiurnal cycle. During the initial period between 29/10/2013 and31/10/2013 and later in the period between 17/11/2013 and 19/11/2013 when in-situ mixing was not occurring a distinct temper-ature stratification between surface and bottom waters of ca1.0–1.5 �C was maintained with occasionally greater excursionsdue to increased surface layer heating. Once in-situ mixing of thepit occurred, however, in the period 31/10/2013 to 17/11/2013only shorter periods of temperature stratification, (up to 1 �C) wereevident in the morning and afternoon with no temperature strati-fication evident overnight.

Electrical conductivity (EC, lS/cm): Prior to in-situ mixing bottomEC was slightly higher than that of the surface. Upon addition ofthe majority of the MgCl2�6H2O and in-situ mixing, both surfaceand bottom EC increased rapidly by ca. 40% with the higher EC inthe bottom maintained to a similar extent to that originally pres-ent. With continued mixing and additional minor MgCl2�6H2Oadded on 1/11/2013 small fluctuations in EC continued to occur.Thereafter, continued mixing of the pit results in increasing con-vergence of the surface and bottom EC. Upon the addition of NaOH

22.5

23.5

24.5

25.5

26.5

Tem

pera

ture

(C) T Surface

T Bottom

2.53.54.55.56.57.58.59.5

10.5

pH

pH SurfacepH Bottom

0.1

10

1000

29-1

0-20

13

31-1

0 -20

13

2-11

- 201

3

4 -11

- 201

3

6 -11

-201

3

8-11

- 201

3

10-1

1-20

13

12-1

1 -20

13

14-1

1 -20

13

16-1

1 -20

13

18-1

1 -20

13

20-1

1-20

13

Turb

idity

(NTU

) Turbidity SurfaceTurbidity Bottom

Fig. 2. Time series of water quality parameters; temperature, electrical conductivity (EC)for the period 29/10/2013 to 19/11/2013 in the Baal Gammon mine pit.

commencing 3/11/2013, approximately a 10% increase in ECoccurred with a similar EC maintained in the surface and bottomwaters. Upon the cessation of NaOH addition on 15/11/2013there was a notable divergence-convergence step in the bottomwater EC temporally corresponding to water column temperaturefluctuations.

pH: Surface and bottom water pH remained similar even duringand after the addition of MgCl2�6H2O which had a similar pH tothat of the pit waters. A substantial increase in pH occurred in bothsurface and bottom waters after the commencement of addition ofNaOH on 3/11/2013. Slightly larger upward pH excursions in thebottom waters reflected the density-driven settling of the 50%w/w NaOH solution. Three substantial increases in both surfaceand bottom water pH (again initially higher in the bottom watersbut equalised during subsequent mixing) commencing 12, 14 and15/12/2013 respectively, elevated the final surface and bottompH to approximately 10. Thereafter, there was a small near lineardecline in the surface water pH by approximately 1 pH unit overthe subsequent four days, while the bottom water pH displayed asimilarly erratic pattern to that of temperature and EC.

Redox potential (Eh, mV): After the completion of the addition ofthe majority of MgCl2�6H2O on 31/10/2013, the Eh of surface andbottom waters was similar and remained so until the commence-ment of the addition of NaOH on 3/11/2013. Thereafter, the Ehbegan to decline rapidly in both surface and bottom waters withsimilar excursions in Eh in bottom waters to that observed in pH.A substantial divergence on Eh occurred after the application ofadditional NaOH on 13/11/2013 with Eh up to 100 mV lower inthe bottom waters than the surface waters with perturbationsoccurring with each additional application of NaOH on 12, 14and 15/11/2013.

Turbidity (Nephelometric Turbidity Units – NTU): Turbidity wassimilar in both surface and bottom waters for a large portion ofthe treatment of the mine pit increasing from 0.1 to 20 NTU inthe period 29/10/2013 to 13/11/2013. Upon the addition of NaOHon 12, 14 and 15/12/2013 respectively, large increases in bottomwater turbidity occurred, likely exceeding the maximum turbidity

2400

2800

3200

3600

4000

EC (µ

S/cm

)

EC SurfaceEC Bottom

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

Eh (m

V)

Eh SurfaceEh Bottom

30405060708090

100

29-1

0-20

13

31-1

0 -20

13

2-11

-201

3

4-11

-201

3

6-11

-201

3

8-11

-201

3

10-1

1 -20

13

12-1

1 -20

13

14-1

1-20

13

16-1

1-20

13

18-1

1 -20

13

20-1

1 -20

13

DO

% s

atur

atio

n

DO SurfaceDO Bottom

, pH, redox potential (Eh), turbidity (NTU) and dissolved oxygen (percent saturation)

Page 5: Contaminant removal from acidic mine pit water via in situ ...virtualcurtain.com.au/.../2014/03/Baal-Gammon-Applied-Geochemistry-Elsevier-81014.pdfContaminant removal from acidic mine

G.B. Douglas / Applied Geochemistry 51 (2014) 15–22 19

range of the probe (1600 NTU). A decline in turbidity in the bottomwaters similar to that observed in surface waters occurred in theperiod after the second addition of NaOH on 14/11/2013 and priorto the final addition on 15/11/2013.

Dissolved oxygen (DO, percent saturation): Dissolved oxygenremained similar in both the surface and bottom waters atbetween 50% and 90% saturation. The close correspondence ofthe DO saturation in both surface and bottom waters persistedeven after the addition of MgCl2�6H2O and subsequent mixing ofthe pit. After the final addition of NaOH on 15/11/2013, however,there was an antithetic trend with a large decline in bottom waterDO saturation to as low as 30% while surface water DO saturationincreased from approximately 70% to 85% saturation.

4.2. Pit water characteristics – major and trace element chemistry

Pre-treatment: Prior to treatment, the Baal Gammon mine pitchemistry was highly acidic (pH 2.9, Table 1), and contained onlylow concentrations of most major cations and anions except forSO4 (1247 mg/L) and F (59 mg/L). Substantial trace element enrich-ment was present for Al (70 mg/L), Cu (40 mg/L), Fe (59 mg/L), Mn(16 mg/L), Si (60 mg/L) and Zn (22 mg/L).

Post-treatment: After the cessation of treatment of the BaalGammon mine pit both the major and trace element chemistryof both surface and bottom waters were substantially modified(Table 1). In terms of major elements, the Na concentrationincreased (34–4100 mg/L) while most other major elements wereof similar concentrations except for F which was approximatelyhalved from 59 mg/L to 33–35 mg/L. A suite of trace elements weresignificantly reduced in both the surface and bottom waters aftertreatment, many to below detection limits (As, Co, Cr, Cu, In, Mo,Ni, Pb, Sb, V and Zn). Additionally, many other trace elements werealso significantly reduced after treatment including Al, Cd, In, Fe,Mn, and Si, with many reduced by at least 95%, with some exceed-ing 99% removal (Table 1).

Reverse osmosis: Reverse osmosis processing of the treated BaalGammon mine pit water yielded a filtrate largely denuded of allmajor ions with substantial reductions in Na, SO4 and F (Table 1).In addition, a range of trace element concentrations were furtherreduced.

4.3. Mineralogy of bottom and suspended sediment samples

Mineralogical analysis of bottom and suspended sediment sam-ples collected from the Baal Gammon mine pit after hydrotalciteprecipitation reveals a range of associations (Fig. 3). Within theunfractionated bottom sediment, hydrotalcite is present in addi-tion to pre-existing quartz, illite, kaolinite and goethite that reflectthe prevailing pit geology. Although some of the hydrotalcite andother mineral peaks coincide, characteristics peaks particularly at13� 2h, but also at 26.5�, and 40� and 73� 2h confirm its presence.Fractionation of the bottom sediment into 0.2–2 lm and <0.2 lmfractions reveals an increasing enrichment in hydrotalcite and cor-responding reduction in the abundance of quartz, illite and kaolin-ite and an absence of goethite. Unfractionated suspended sedimenthas the simplest mineralogy of all samples being dominated byhydrotalcite and lesser illite. Often broad hydrotalcite peaks mayindicate a variable composition and/or degree of hydration.

4.4. Geochemical composition of hydrotalcite precipitates

Analysis of hydrotalcite precipitates from the Baal Gammonmine pit water indicates a precipitate enriched in Mg + Cu + Zn + Mnas the major divalent cations, (all expressed as MgO in Fig. 4) andAl2O3 commensurate with hydrotalcite chemistry/stoichiometry(Table 2). Anions present within the hydrotalcite interlayers are

dominated by sulphate (13.58% as SO3), however Si (7.19% as SiO2)may also be present as the silicate anion or alternatively as colloidalsilica or minor suspended clay minerals entrained duringhydrotalcite precipitation. The majority of Na and Cl are due to haliteprecipitation as observed in SEM analysis. Calculated divalent(Mg + Cu + Zn + Mn) to trivalent (Al) molar ratios are 2.07 ± 0.11 inaccordance with typical hydrotalcite stoichiometry of 2:1 to 4:1.Also of note is the presence of elevated mean concentrations of bothCu (8.00 ± 1.00%) and Zn (3.87 ± 0.53%).

5. Discussion

5.1. Hydrotalcite formation in the Baal Gammon mine pit context

Advantageously, the Baal Gammon pit water contained abun-dant Mg and Al (both 70 mg/L, Table 1) which functioned as (par-tial) building blocks for in-situ hydrotalcite formation (Miyata,1983; Taylor, 1984). Based on recent research (Douglas et al.,2010, 2011), it was postulated that the formation of hydrotalcitewith a suitable stoichiometry, i.e. a M2+: M3+ molar ratio of ca.2.5, could be facilitated via addition of Mg (as MgCl2�6H2O). Withprogressive addition of Mg, the Baal Gammon mine pit waterwould follow a compositional trajectory defined by the solid anddashed mixing lines in Fig. 4. The addition of Mg was designed toyield a final M2+:M3+ molar ratio of 2.5 that occupied a positionwell within the hydrotalcite stability field. In addition, this ratiowas sufficiently above that of the lower hydrotalcite M2+:M3+ com-positional molar ratio of 2 to allow an operational margin for spa-tial or vertical variation within the pit water composition. Thisvariation was likely due to surface or groundwater flow of a differ-ent composition or in-situ physical pit lake stratification that mayhave induced geochemical changes to redox-sensitive elementssuch as Fe.

Based on the pre-existing composition of the Baal Gammonmine pit water, in-situ formation of hydrotalcites was consideredon a geochemical basis as the most viable option for the simulta-neous removal and stabilisation of the broad spectrum of contam-inants present. Importantly, hydrotalcites, and in particular thosethat contain either carbonate and/or bicarbonate as the predomi-nant anion, have also been demonstrated to have a considerablecapacity to neutralise a range of mineral acids via consumptionof both the hydroxyl and carbonate anions contained within theirstructure (e.g. Kameda et al., 2003). This neutralisation capacitymay confer a particularly important characteristic as a mineral buf-fer in the event that the hydrotalcite-based precipitate wereexposed to additional acidity during or after disposal.

An SEM analyse of precipitates formed in situ from the BaalGammon mine pit water document the present of extensiveface-to-face layered aggregates of partially rounded hexagonal0.2–0.5 lm hydrotalcite crystals (Fig. 5). Compositional (EDAX)analyses indicate that while the hydrotalcite is as expectedenriched in Mg due to the addition of Mg (as MgCl2�6H2O), it isslightly less enriched than the theoretical estimate (Table 2,Fig. 4). The precipitate, however, is less enriched in Fe than the the-oretical estimate. These variations may reflect in part the presentof co-existing/co-precipitated illite (Fig. 3) with a general formulaof K0.65Al2.0[Al0.65Si3.35O10](OH)2, but with the possibility of someimpurities being present: (K,H3O)(Al,Mg,Fe)2(Si,Al)4O10(OH)2 suchthat the Baal Gammon mine pit water precipitate would lie on acompositional line away from the theoretical compositional esti-mate and towards a slightly more Al –rich position on the Mg-Alcompositional line as observed (Fig. 4). The slightly lower M2+:M3+ of 2.07 ± 0.11 as determined by SEM-EDAX in the water col-umn precipitate is also consistent with the presence of illite mostprominent in the unfractionated bottom sediment samples (Fig. 3).

Page 6: Contaminant removal from acidic mine pit water via in situ ...virtualcurtain.com.au/.../2014/03/Baal-Gammon-Applied-Geochemistry-Elsevier-81014.pdfContaminant removal from acidic mine

HYDROTALCITE (HT)QUARTZ (Q)ILLITE (I)KAOLINITE (K)GOETHITE (G)

2-Theta Angle (deg)

10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00 60.00 70.00

10

20

30

40

Nom

inal

Inte

nsity

Bottom sedimentunfractionated

Suspended sediment unfractionated

Bottom sediment<0.2 µm fraction

Bottom sediment0.2 – 2 µm fraction

HT

HT

HT

HT

Q

I

Q

Q

Q

I

I

K I K

K

K K KG K K K

II

QQ

Q

II I

I K

Fig. 3. Mineralogy of sediment samples collected from the bottom waters in the Baal Gammon mine pit after treatment.

Mg

Al Fe

Fig. 4. Ternary Mg–Fe–Al system showing the stability domain for hydrotalcites(pale green) in the presence of Fe(II, III) waters (modified after Feder et al., 2005).The initial composition of Baal Gammon mine pit water (filled circle) is also shown.Note that Mg = Mg + Cu + Zn + Mn due to isomorphic substitution into the hydro-talcite. A theoretical composition after the addition of Mg (open circle) and mixingtrajectory (solid and dashed lines) is also shown. Compositions of hydrotalciteproduced in the pit water are also shown (smaller grouped circles).

Table 2Summary of major (wt.% oxide) and trace (wt.%) element composition, of hydrotal-cite-based precipitates formed from Baal Gammon mine pit water. Figures in italicsdenote analytical detection limits.

Oxide/element Mean Std. Dev. Minimum Maximum

SiO2 7.19 1.22 5.95 9.75Al2O3 25.07 1.34 23.72 27.71Na2O 2.73 0.41 1.91 3.11K2O 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00CaO 0.93 0.14 0.75 1.13MgO 31.91 1.48 30.03 34.00Fe2O3 1.88 0.62 1.27 3.29MnO 2.86 0.99 2.11 5.13SO3 13.58 1.53 11.38 15.97Cl 1.99 0.72 0.7 3.1Cu 8.00 1.00 6.5 9.8Zn 3.87 0.53 3.1 4.9

Fig. 5. Extensive layered face to face aggregates of partially rounded hydrotalcitecrystals formed in situ from Baal Gammon mine pit water. Individual hydrotalcitecrystals typically vary from 0.2 to 0.5 lm in diameter.

20 G.B. Douglas / Applied Geochemistry 51 (2014) 15–22

Alternatively, the compositional variation away from the theo-retical prediction indicates some internal spatial variation in thecomposition of the Baal Gammon mine pit due to factors influenc-ing pit water composition such as groundwater inputs (with a pos-sibly different composition) as outlined above. Nonetheless, asrequired, the hydrotalcite precipitate formed sits well within thetheoretical stability domain (Fig. 4).

5.2. Mode of hydrotalcite formation within the Baal Gammon mine pitwater

The removal of a range of major and trace element cations isconsistent with the solubility of metal hydroxide species whichare progressively incorporated into the hydrotalcite structure. Inparticular there is a cascade of metal hydroxide precipitation reac-tions with increasing pH (Fig. 6).

Following initial NaOH addition, Al is progressively precipitatedwith a solubility minimum at approximately pH 6, thereafter redis-solving to form the soluble aluminate (Al(OH)4

�) anion withincreasing pH. Analysis of temporal trends in pH and turbidity

Page 7: Contaminant removal from acidic mine pit water via in situ ...virtualcurtain.com.au/.../2014/03/Baal-Gammon-Applied-Geochemistry-Elsevier-81014.pdfContaminant removal from acidic mine

Fig. 6. Typical solubility curves for a range of metal hydroxides present in the BaalGammon mine pit water. Grey shaded area is the range of surface and bottom waterpH during the five days after final NaOH addition.

G.B. Douglas / Applied Geochemistry 51 (2014) 15–22 21

(Fig. 2) exemplify this process. With increasing surface and bottompit water pH from ca. 4 to 8 commencing on 12/11/2013, there wasa substantial increase in bottom water turbidity exceeding 1600NTU corresponding to Al(OH)3 formation/precipitation. Thereafter,with increasing pH the bottom water turbidity rapidly declined asre-dissolution of Al(OH)3 occurred with the aluminate anion pre-dominating at pH 8.5 to 9.0 (commencing 14/11/2013). With ongo-ing NaOH addition to increase surface and bottom pit water pHfrom 8 to 10, with the progressive formation of brucite (Mg(OH)2),and the self assembly of hydrotalcite, the bottom water turbidityagain increased rapidly to exceed 1600 NTU as the hydrotalciteprecipitate rapidly settled into the base of the pit water column.

Similar to the precipitation/re-dissolution of Al, a range of othermetals began to precipitate with a range of solubility minima pre-dominantly between pH 8 and 10. These precipitated metalhydroxides isomorphically substituted for Mg and Al as self assem-bly occurred to form a multi-element hydrotalcite (Fig. 6).

Upon the final addition of NaOH to the Baal Gammon mine pit,and with this the spontaneous formation of hydrotalcite in-situ,and an increase in particle size due to aggregation and nucleationon suspended clays, rapid settling occurred. This process reflecteda major divergence in turbidity manifested as a low surface turbid-ity of approximately 2–5 NTU and the sustained high turbidity inthe bottom waters that exceed 1600 NTU (Fig. 2). Importantly,within three days of the completion of hydrotalcite precipitation,the clarity of the pit water had increased to approximately 7 mindicating an on-going settling and consolidation of the hydrotal-cite-based precipitate. The rapid settling of hydrotalcite formedin-situ paralleled that observed in initial laboratory-based neutral-isation experiments used in the experimental planning of thein-situ pit remediation.

Concomitant with the high final pH of the water column ofapproximately 10, absorption of atmospheric CO2, primarily as aresult of wind mixing of the pit surface resulted in a gradual pHdecline that was not manifested in the bottom layer after cessationof active mixing of the pit water column. This relative change inthe pH profile is important for two reasons. Firstly, with increasingtime, the surface pH would decrease and buffer with bicarbonate(HCO3

�) formation to ca. 8.5, (Table 1). Secondly, the higher pH inthe bottom of the pit water column would ensure maintenanceof optimal conditions for hydrotalcite formation. Nonetheless, evenif the pH in the bottom of the pit declined, the hydrotalcite wouldremain stable, albeit with a possibly increased propensity for anionexchange as HCO3

� replaced (partial) CO32� occupation of interlayer

sites. With sufficient time it could be expected that as in the upperwater column, with natural mixing, or if convective overturn wasinduced via artificial means, the lower water column would alsoachieve a final pH of ca. 8.5.

5.3. Outcomes following hydrotalcite formation in the Baal Gammonmine pit

In-situ hydrotalcite precipitation to treat 56 ML of water con-tained within the Baal Gammon mine pit conferred major changesin water quality consistent with theoretical predictions. Followingthe neutralisation of the pit and the precipitation of a multi-ele-ment hydrotalcite, the chemistry of the solute assumed a predom-inantly Na–Cl–SO4 composition impoverished in a range of traceelements (Table 1).

In the context of additional treatment by RO, of particularimportance was the low post-treatment concentration of Si whichwas reduced by approximately 98% to 1.3 mg/L. This reduction in Sicombined with the low concentrations of a suite of other elementsallows for the enhanced recovery of solute via RO. Results of ROtreatment (Table 1) indicate that the filtrate produced satisfiedproposed water release criteria.

The presence of elevated mean concentrations of both Cu(8.00 ± 1.00%) and Zn (3.87 ± 0.53%) in the hydrotalcite precipitateis particularly significant in the context of the reprocessing torecover metal value that can offset remediation costs. Both metalconcentrations are of ore grade, and given their geochemical form,a potential exists to redissolve the hydrotalcite via the addition ofacid to a pH of below ca. 4 and recovery via ion-exchange from theresulting solute. This method is particularly applicable to a pump-and-treat scenario where high purity hydrotalcite, uncontami-nated by mixing with pit sediments could be produced by suitableon-line addition of reagents.

The application of in-situ hydrotalcite precipitation also resultedin low residual sludge volumes (Supplementary Fig. 1). This is in con-trast to large volumes of gypsum that would have been formed vialime addition that would have required dewatering in addition to asubstantially larger final void volume for disposal.

6. Conclusions

The sequential addition of MgCl2�6H2O added according to stoi-chiometric requirements followed by NaOH to Baal Gammon minepit water has been demonstrated to form a hydrotalcite-based pre-cipitate. Importantly, the hydrotalcite-based precipitationremoved a broad spectrum of trace elements of environmentalconcern including Al, Cd, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni and Zn. An ore gradeprecipitate containing substantial Cu (8.00 ± 1.00%) and Zn(3.87 ± 0.53%) could also be produced in hydrotalcite precipitateddirectly from the mine pit water column.

The final water quality produced after treatment was of a sim-ple Na-Cl-SO4 type. Post-remediation in-situ monitoring of the BaalGammon mine pit revealed a gradual decline in water column pHto ca. 9.0 with a likely eventual decline in pH to ca. 8.5. Given thesubstantial removal of a range of major and trace elements includ-ing the majority of foulants, RO was successfully utilised with highpermeate recoveries allowing the treated solute to meet stringentwater quality discharge criteria.

Acknowledgements

CSIRO and Virtual Curtain Ltd acknowledges the substantiallogistical and technical assistance of management and minesitestaff from Snow Peak Mining Pty Ltd during planning and thetreatment of the Baal Gammon mine pit. The contributions of Peter

Page 8: Contaminant removal from acidic mine pit water via in situ ...virtualcurtain.com.au/.../2014/03/Baal-Gammon-Applied-Geochemistry-Elsevier-81014.pdfContaminant removal from acidic mine

22 G.B. Douglas / Applied Geochemistry 51 (2014) 15–22

Self and Mark Raven, CSIRO Land and Water, Adelaide for XRD andXRF analysis, Sophia Surin for SEM analysis of CSIRO Process Sci-ence and Engineering, Waterford, and SGS Cairns and the Chem-Centre of Western Australia for solute chemical analyses are alsoacknowledged.

Appendix A. Supplementary material

Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, inthe online version, at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2014.09.005.

References

Akcil, A., Koldas, S., 2006. Acid mine drainage, AMD: causes, treatment and casestudies. J. Clean. Prod. 14, 1139–1145.

American Public Health Association (APHA), 2005. Standard Methods for theExamination of Water and Wastewater. 21st ed.

Anon, 2013. Monto minerals limited. Baal Gammon Polymetallic Project website:<http://montominerals.com/baal%20_gammon_polymetallic_project>.

Behrens, M., Kasatkin, I., Kuhl, S., Weinberg, G., 2010. Phase-pure Cu, Zn, Alhydrotalcite-like materials as precursors for copper rich Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 catalysts.Chem. Mater. 22, 386–397.

Cavani, F., Trifiro, F., Vaccari, A., 1991. HT-type anionic clays: preparation, propertiesand applications. Catal. Today 11, 173–301.

Cravotta, C.A., Trahan, M.K., 1999. Limestone drains to increase pH and removedissolved metals from acidic mine drainage. Appl. Geochem. 14, 581–606.

Depege, C., El Metoui, F.Z., Forano, C., de Roy, A., Dupuis, J., Besse, J.P., 1996.Polymerization of silicates in layered double hydroxides. Chem. Mater. 8, 952–960.

Douglas, G.B., 2006. Provisional Patent Application. Remediation of Groundwater.Douglas, G.B., 2009. Provisional Patent Application. Treatment Remed. Nat.

Wastewater.Douglas, G.B., Wendling, L.A., Pleysier, R., Trefry, M.G., 2010. Hydrotalcite formation

for contaminant removal from Ranger mine process water. Mine Water Environ.29, 108–115.

Douglas, G.B., Wendling, L., Usher, K., Woods, P., 2011. Application of Hydrotalcitesfor Remediation of Beverley In-Situ Recovery Uranium Mine Barren Lixiviant.In: Proceedings of GLOBAL 2011, Makuhari, Japan, December 11–16, 2011.Paper No. 148, 5pp.

Douglas, G., Shackleton, M., Woods, P., 2014. Hydrotalcite formation facilitateseffective contaminant and radionuclide removal from acidic uranium minebarren lixiviant. Appl. Geochem. 42, 27–37.

Feder, F., Trolard, F., Klingelhofer, G., Bourrie, G., 2005. In situ Mossbauerspectroscopy: evidence for green rust (fougerite) in a gleysol and itsmineralogical transformations with time and depth. Geochim. Cosmochim.Acta 69, 4463–4483.

Hammerstrom, J.M., Sibrell, P.L., Belkin, H.E., 2003. Characterisation of limestonereacted with acid-mine drainage in a pulsed limestone bed treatment system atthe Friendship Hill National Historical Site, Pennsylvania, USA. Appl. Geochem.18, 1705–1721.

Hedin, R.S., Watzlaf, G.R., Nairn, R.W., 1994. Passive treatment of acid-minedrainage with limestone. J. Environ. Qual. 23, 1338–1345.

Johnson, D.B., Hallberg, K.B., 2005. Acid mine drainage remediation options: areview. Sci. Tot. Environ. 338, 3–14.

Kameda, T., Yabuuchi, F., Yoshioka, T., Uchida, M., Okuwaki, A., 2003. New methodof treating dilute mineral acids using magnesium–aluminium oxide. Water Res.37, 1545–1550.

Miyata, S., 1983. Anion-exchange properties of HT-like compounds. Clay ClayMiner. 31, 305–311.

Norrish, K., Chappell, B.W., 1977. X-ray fluorescence spectrometry. In: Zussman, J.(Ed.), Physical Methods in Determinative Mineralogy, second ed. AcademicPress, London, pp. 201–272.

Santomartino, S., Webb, J.A., 2007. Estimating the longevity of limestone drains intreating acid mine drainage containing high concentrations of iron. Appl.Geochem. 22, 2344–2361.

Seida, Y., Nakano, Y., 2002. Removal of phosphate by layered double hydroxidescontaining iron. Water Res. 36, 1306–1312.

Shin, H.S., Kim, M.J., Nam, S.Y., Moon, H.-C., 1996. Phosphorus removal by HTcompounds (HTLcs). Water Sci. Technol. 34, 161–168.

Taylor, R.M., 1984. The rapid formation of crystalline double hydroxy salts andother compounds by controlled hydrolysis. Clay Mineral. 19, 591–603.

Ulibarri, M.A., Pavlovic, I., Barriga, C., Hermosín, M.C., Cornejo, J., 2001. Adsorptionof anionic species on hydrotalcite-like compounds: effect of interlayer anionand crystallinity. Appl. Clay Sci. 18, 17–27.

Vucelic, M., Jones, W., Moggridge, G.D., 1997. Cation ordering in synthetic layereddouble hydroxides. Clays Clay Mineral. 45, 803–813.

Watten, B.J., Sibrell, P.L., Schwartz, M.F., 2005. Acid neutralisation within limestonesand reactors receiving coal mine drainage. Environ. Pollut. 137, 295–304.

Ziemkiewicz, P.F., Skousen, J.G., Brant, D.L., Sterner, P.L., Lovett, R.J., 1997. Acid minedrainage treatment with armoured limestone in open limestone channels. J.Environ. Qual. 26, 1017–1024.