content analysis 10-11-11

12
CONTENT ANALYSIS Interactive behaviours in constituency level online campaigns in the 2010 UK General Election Benjamin Lee Institute for social change [email protected]. ac.uk 1

Upload: ben-lee

Post on 30-Jun-2015

317 views

Category:

Technology


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Lessons from content analysis component of my thesis

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Content Analysis 10-11-11

CONTENT ANALYSISInteractive behaviours in constituency level online campaigns in the 2010 UK General Election

Benjamin LeeInstitute for social [email protected]

1

Page 2: Content Analysis 10-11-11

2

BACKGROUND

Part of a PhD looking at the use of Web campaigns

Previous work had looked at adoption of online campaign tools, but how were they used?

Web 2.0 services built on interactivity, creates the possibility for innovation?

Specifically wanted to measure the level of interactive behaviour campaigns were engaging in

Page 3: Content Analysis 10-11-11

3

REQUIREMENTS

Had to measure different levels of interactivity Public dialogue Potential dialogue Site based interactivity

Had to cover the entirety of a web presence across three platforms Website Facebook Twitter

Had to be relatively simple, 300+ campaigns in a week

Page 4: Content Analysis 10-11-11

4

Page 5: Content Analysis 10-11-11

5

RESULTS – PUBLIC DIALOGUE

Page 6: Content Analysis 10-11-11

6

RESULTS – POTENTIAL DIALOGUE

Page 7: Content Analysis 10-11-11

7

RESULTS – SITE BASED INTERACTIVITY

Page 8: Content Analysis 10-11-11

8

LESSON 1 – IDENTIFYING WEBSITES

How can we identify websites? Web 2.0 has shifted analysis away from

individual sites to collections of sites, we need to consider web presences

How can these be identified, especially when we don’t know the context

Practical difficulties in tracking down websites Google Tweetminster Facebook search

Page 9: Content Analysis 10-11-11

9

Page 10: Content Analysis 10-11-11

10

LESSON 2 – WEB 2.0 IS DIFFERENT

Difficult to identify equivalent behaviours across platforms Common interactive behaviours on

websites are very uncommon on social networks e.g. downloading material

Social networks also very structured, difficult for campaigns to do new things

Interactivity is inbuilt into Web 2.0 platforms

Page 11: Content Analysis 10-11-11

11

LESSON 3 – KNOW YOUR MEASUREMENTS What is content analysis actually measuring? Consider an aggregate interactivity index

either additive or based on PCA Can we really combine public dialogue,

potential dialogue and site-based interactivity?

Is a Facebook message as interactive or more interactive than a Twitter message?

Are we measuring behaviours or design decisions and organisational choices?

Page 12: Content Analysis 10-11-11

12

LESSON 4 – THE FUTURE IS UNWRITTEN Future developments mean more complications

Google + Diaspora Mobile applications/html 5 Proprietary social networks LibDemACT, MembersNet, MyConservatives ?

‘I think Google Plus will change all that… Because you can search on issues, you link it up with Twitter and it’s designed to interact with other social networks, it’s somewhere between Live Journal, Facebook and Twitter all rolled into one’

Lib-Dem Campaign Manager

Innovation within current platforms e.g. Facebook pages Also, changes in user behaviour and attitudes e.g.

Privacy on Facebook