control charts for variables - faculty of …fkm.utm.my/~shari/download/qc05 controlchart1.pdf ·...

23
Control charts for variables CONTROL CHARTS FOR VARIABLES Concept of variation - No 2 things are alike Variation exists - Even if variation small and appears same; precision instruments show differences - Ability to measure variation necessary – before can control. Basically 3 categories of variation in piece – part production (e.g. Light bulbs, washer, nuts, etc.) 1. Within piece - e.g. surface roughness 2. Piece to piece - eg. dimensions 3. Time to time - different outcomes e.g. morning & afternoon, tool wear, workers tired control chartsvariable©smy.fkm.utm 1

Upload: doanlien

Post on 27-May-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Control charts for variables

CONTROL CHARTS FOR VARIABLES

• Concept of variation - No 2 things are alike

∴ Variation exists

- Even if variation small and appears same; precision instruments show differences

- Ability to measure variation necessary

– before can control. Basically 3 categories of variation in piece – part production (e.g. Light bulbs, washer, nuts, etc.) 1. Within piece - e.g. surface roughness

2. Piece to piece - eg. dimensions

3. Time to time - different outcomes e.g.

morning & afternoon, tool

wear, workers tired

control chartsvariable©smy.fkm.utm 1

Control charts for variables

Many factors contribute to variation

Source of variation - combination of equipments, materials, environment, operator, etc. Equipment - tool wear, electrical fluctuations

for welding Material - tensile strength, moisture content

(e.g. raw material) Environment - temperature, light, humidity etc. Operator - method, SOP followed, motivation

level, training Inspection - inspector, inspection equipment,

environment

control chartsvariable©smy.fkm.utm 2

Control charts for variables

CONCEPT OF CHANCE & ASSIGNABLE CAUSE

• Chance causes are inevitable (unavoidable)

• As long as fluctuate in natural/expected manner stable pattern of chance causes of variation which are small - OK ✓

• If causes of variation large in magnitude; can be identified, classified as assignable causes of variation. If present, process variation is excessive (beyond expected natural variation)

• State of statistical control – chance

• State of out of control – assignable cause

• Body temperature - 36.5oC ~ 37.5oC

control chartsvariable©smy.fkm.utm 3

Control charts for variables

CONTROL CHART METHOD - c.c. means of visualizing variations that

occur in the central tendency and dispersion of a set of observations

- graphical record of a particular quality

characteristic

control chartsvariable©smy.fkm.utm 4

Control charts for variables

• Control limits are not specification limits

• CL are permissible limits of a quality characteristic

• Evaluate variations in quality subgroup to subgroup

• Limits established at ±3 standard dev. from central line; Normal Dist. – 99.73% of items lie within the limits

control chartsvariable©smy.fkm.utm 5

Control charts for variables

OBJECTIVES OF VARIABLE CONTROL CHART

• For quality improvement • To determine process capability • For decisions in product specifications • Provide info. on production processes for

current decisions – SOSC – leave alone SOOC – investigate, solve, rectify, improve

• Make decisions on recently produced items -

release next process, customer or other disposition method, sorting, rework, reject

control chartsvariable©smy.fkm.utm 6

Control charts for variables

VARIABLE CHART How to establish x (average) R (Range) chart? Steps. 1. Select quality characteristics

2. Choose rational subgroup 3. Collect data

4. Determine trial limits and central

line

5. Establish revised central line and control limits

6. Achieve the objective

control chartsvariable©smy.fkm.utm 7

Control charts for variables

1. Choosing quality charac. - measurable data i.e. numbers - 7 basic units, length, mass, time, etc. - affecting performance, function of prdt. - Pareto analysis – highest % rejects,

high prod. costs

- Impossible to put X - R on all charac. selective OR treat as attributes chart

2. Choose rational subgroup

- rational subgroup which have variation within the group due only to chance causes

- two ways selecting subgroup samples 1. Select subgroup samples at one

instant of time or as close as possible

2. Select period of time product produced

control chartsvariable©smy.fkm.utm 8

Control charts for variables

- lots must be homogeneous : same machine, same operator

- decisions on size of sample empirical

judgement & relates to costs

choose n = 4 or 5 → use R-chart

when n ≥ 10 → use s-chart - frequency of taking subgroups often

enough to detect process changes - Guideline of sample sizes/frequency using

Say, 4000 parts/day ∴ 75 samples

if n = 4 ∴ 19 subgroups or n = 5 15 subgroups

control chartsvariable©smy.fkm.utm 9

Control charts for variables

3. Collect data - Use form or standard check sheet - Collect a minimum of 25 subgroups

• Does not matter Vertical or Horizontal

Subgroup Number Measure 1 2 3 4 5 …… ….. …. 25

x1

x2

x3

x4

x5

35

40

32

37

34

34 40 38 35 38

x

35.6

37.0

R 8 6

control chartsvariable©smy.fkm.utm 10

Control charts for variables

4. Determine trial control limits

Central line X and R

X = g

xg

1ii∑

= R = g

Rg

1ii∑

=

X = avg. of subgroup avg. ix = avg. of ith subgroup

g = no. of subgroups

R = avg. of subgroup ranges Ri = range of ith subgroup SIMPLIFIED

xUCL = x3X σ+ → RAX 2+

xLCL = x3σ−X → RAX 2−

UCLR = R + 3σR → D4R

LCLR = R + 3σR → D3R

Where A2, D4, D3 are factors - vary according to different n.

control chartsvariable©smy.fkm.utm 11

Control charts for variables

5. Establish Revised Control Limits

- First plot preliminary data collected using control limits & center lines established in step 4.

- Next step adopt standard values. If

good control i.e. no out-of-control points

oXX →

oRR →

- If there are points out-of-control discard

from data

Look at record - show an assignable cause – don’t use

gdgxxX dnew

−Σ−Σ

=

gdgRdRRnew −

Σ−Σ=

control chartsvariable©smy.fkm.utm 12

Control charts for variables

newo XX = newo RR =

and 2

oo d

R=σ

3σ oox AXCL σ±=

Cont.

Limits UCLR = D2σo LCLR = D1σo

control chartsvariable©smy.fkm.utm 13

Control charts for variables

- Limits for both charts become narrower

after revised - Revised limits used to report / plot future

sub-groups - For effective use – chart must be displayed

and easily seen

control chartsvariable©smy.fkm.utm 14

Control charts for variables

Final comments 1) Many analyst eliminate this revised step -

but actually more representative of process 2) Formula mathematically same

new2newoo RAXA +=σ+X

3) Initial est. of process cap. 6σo

True Cp is next 4) If use specification; nominal (target) value =

oX . Range doesn’t change

5) Adjustments made to processes while taking data – not necessarily running defectives while collecting data

6) Process determines center line and the control limits, not design or manufacturing

7) When population values known easily

obtained limits σ=σ⋅µ= ooX

control chartsvariable©smy.fkm.utm 15

Control charts for variables

6. Achieving objective Initiate control charts results in quality improvement - Less variation in sub-group averages - Reduction in variation of range Reduce frequency of inspection monitoring purpose – even once/mth.

control chartsvariable©smy.fkm.utm 16

Control charts for variables

HOW CONTROLCHART HELPS IN Q.I. • psychological effect to do better • Example: maintenance group helps shift

process center • May be purchasing changed material supplier

to ensure consistent quality • Improvements must be from investigation of

assignable causes (need technical back up)

control chartsvariable©smy.fkm.utm 17

Control charts for variables

SAMPLE STD. DEVIATION CHART

(x - s control chart )

BOTH R chart - simple, use xH & xL MEAS. S chart - more calculation needed, use

OF ALL xi’s ∴ more DISP. accurate, sub-group sample std. dev.

If n < 10 R chart ≅ s chart

n ≥ 10 s chart better R chart not accurate any more

control chartsvariable©smy.fkm.utm 18

Control charts for variables

Reminder:

( )1nxxs i

−−Σ

=

SAME STEPS, DIFF. FORMULA

sAXUCL 3x += sBUCL 4s =

sAXLCL 3x += sBLCL 3s =

DISCARD

d

dnewo ggXXXX

−−Σ

==

d

dnewo gg

ssSS−

Σ−Σ==

44

oo C

sCs

==σ

control chartsvariable©smy.fkm.utm 19

Control charts for variables

oox AXUCL σ+=

oox AXLCL σ+=

UCLs = B6σo

LCLs = B5σo

A, B5, B6 – factors for obtaining 3σ control limits

control chartsvariable©smy.fkm.utm 20

Control charts for variables

STATE OF CONTROL

• When assignable causes eliminated and points plotted are new within C.L. process state of control

• Further improvement through changing basic process, system

• What are the characteristics of process in control? (natural pattern of variation)

• 34% within 1σ from Center Line

• 13% between 1σ & 2σ

• 2.5% of plotted points - 2σ → 3σ

• Points located back & forth across center line random way

• No points out of control

• Subgroup avg’s forms freq. dist which is normal distribution.

control chartsvariable©smy.fkm.utm 21

Control charts for variables

• Control limits – established at 3σ from center line.

• Choice of 3σ is economic decision with respect to 2 types of error.

Type I - occurs when looking for assignable

cause but in reality chance cause present

FALSE ALARM

Limits set ±3σ Type I error prob = 0.27% or 3/1000

Say point our control → due to assign. Even though 3/1000 of the time can be due to chance cause Type II - assume chance cause present, but

in fact assignable cause present

A

Re

c

TRUELARM

ecords indicate 3σ limits balance between 2 rrors.

ontrol chartsvariable©smy.fkm.utm 22

Control charts for variables

control chartsvariable©smy.fkm.utm 23

Process in control 1. Individual parts will be more uniform – less

variation and fewer rejects 2. Cost of inspection will decrease 3. Process capability easily attained 4. Trouble can be anticipated before it occurs 5. Percentage of parts fall between two values can

be predicted with highest degree of accuracy, e.g. filling machines

6. X-R charts can be used as statistical evidence for process control

7. Predictable and stable process only chance causes present