controversial subjects - uc davis grad studies...controversial subjects a graduate student holds a...

2
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS CONCLUSION WORKSHOPS (Cont.) WORKSHOPS Jordan S. Carroll Ph.D. Candidate, Department of English INTRODUCTION Controversial Subjects A graduate student holds a teach-out on a divisive issue. A student government passes a policy requiring instructors to include in their syllabi warnings about any violent or sexually explicit content on their reading lists. A professor is penalized for pos=ng an unpopular opinion on social media. From campus protests to content warnings, the news is filled with stories that challenge graduate students and professors to think cri=cally about how they respond to controversial topics. How should graduate students frame and discuss conten=ous topics in their fields? This project featured a series of workshops that offered prac=cal advice to graduate students on how to navigate these issues. The series included three events. Each event featured a panel discussion. The first workshop, “Teaching Troubling Topics,” focused on methods graduate students can use to present challenging material while s=ll respec=ng the needs of a diverse student popula=on that may include trauma survivors. Panel par=cipants discussed not only pedagogical strategies but also how to direct students to campus counseling resources. “Teaching Poli=cal Controversies,” the second workshop, provided an opportunity for instructors to discuss tac=cs for teaching poli=cally charged topics. Touching on issues ranging from evolu=onary biology to reproduc=ve rights, the panel considered how instructors should present their own views as well as how to respond to resistant students. The final event, “Graduate Students and Public Controversy” featured a panel discussion interroga=ng how debates about acceptable academic speech fit into the broader context of the changing profession, new media, and the post-recession university. Panelists offered sugges=ons on how graduate students can make their voices heard through union organizing and commiNee work while also naviga=ng the perils of the job market. Ques%on and answer discussion during “Teaching Troubling Topics” Special thanks to Simon Abramowitsch, Dr. Arnold J. Bloom, Christy Cahill, Dr. Bai-Yin Chen, Dr. Teresa Dillinger, Valerie Feldman, Dr. Elizabeth Freeman, Dr. Bruce D. Haynes, Sawyer K. Kemp, and Duane Wright. Audience members provided posi=ve feedback for the workshop series. Many reportedly enjoyed the opportunity to discuss issues they have faced in the classroom and in the profession. While the workshops addressed difficult subjects and open ques=ons, par=cipants leX with new insights into how to approach them.

Upload: others

Post on 25-Jun-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Controversial Subjects - UC Davis Grad Studies...Controversial Subjects A graduate student holds a teach-out on a divisive issue. A student government passes a policy requiring instructors

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

CONCLUSION WORKSHOPS (Cont.)

WORKSHOPS

Jordan S. Carroll Ph.D. Candidate, Department of English

INTRODUCTION

Controversial Subjects

Agraduatestudentholdsateach-outonadivisiveissue. A student government passes a policyrequiring instructors to include in their syllabiwarnings about any violent or sexually explicitcontent on their reading lists. A professor ispenalized for pos=ng an unpopular opinion onsocial media. From campus protests to contentwarnings, the news is filled with stories thatchallengegraduatestudentsandprofessorstothinkcri=cally about how they respond to controversialtopics. How should graduate students frame anddiscuss conten=ous topics in their fields? Thisprojectfeaturedaseriesofworkshopsthatofferedprac=cal advice to graduate students on how tonavigatetheseissues.

The series included three events. Each eventfeatured a panel discussion. The first workshop,“Teaching Troubling Topics,” focused on methodsgraduate students can use to present challengingmaterialwhiles=llrespec=ngtheneedsofadiversestudent popula=on that may include traumasurvivors. Panel par=cipants discussed not onlypedagogical strategies but also how to directstudentstocampuscounselingresources.“TeachingPoli=cal Controversies,” the second workshop,providedanopportunityforinstructors

to discuss tac=cs for teaching poli=cally chargedtopics. Touching on issues ranging fromevolu=onary biology to reproduc=ve rights, thepanelconsideredhow instructorsshouldpresenttheir own views as well as how to respond toresistant students. The final event, “GraduateStudents and Public Controversy” featured apaneldiscussioninterroga=nghowdebatesaboutacceptable academic speech fit into the broadercontext of the changing profession, newmedia,and the post-recession university. Panelistsoffered sugges=ons on how graduate studentscan make their voices heard through unionorganizing and commiNee work while alsonaviga=ngtheperilsofthejobmarket.

Ques%onandanswerdiscussionduring“TeachingTroublingTopics”

S p e c i a l t h a n k s t o S imonAbramowitsch, Dr. Arnold J.Bloom, Christy Cahill, Dr. Bai-YinChen,Dr.TeresaDillinger,ValerieFeldman, Dr. Elizabeth Freeman,Dr. Bruce D. Haynes, Sawyer K.Kemp,andDuaneWright.

Audience members provided posi=vefeedback for the workshop series. Manyreportedly enjoyed the opportunity todiscuss issues they have faced in theclassroomand intheprofession.Whiletheworkshops addresseddifficult subjects andopen ques=ons, par=cipants leX with newinsightsintohowtoapproachthem.

Page 2: Controversial Subjects - UC Davis Grad Studies...Controversial Subjects A graduate student holds a teach-out on a divisive issue. A student government passes a policy requiring instructors

Professors for the Future, 2015 - 2016

PFTF Fellow: Jordan S. Carroll Program: English Major Professor: Colin Milburn

Project Title: "Controversial Subjects."

Project Summary: The headlines are filled with stories that challenge professors and graduate student instructors to draw the line between acceptable and unacceptable speech. Responding to these debates, the Controversial Subjects workshop series explored how professors might best address sensitive or contentious topics in the classroom as well as in their careers as public intellectuals. The series included three events. The first workshop, “Teaching Troubling Topics,” focused on methods graduate students could use to present potentially disturbing material while still respecting the needs of a diverse student population that may include trauma survivors. “Teaching Political Controversies,” the second workshop, provided an opportunity for instructors to discuss strategies for teaching politically charged topics. The final event, “Graduate Students and Public Controversy” featured a panel discussion interrogating how debates about acceptable academic speech fit into the broader context of the changing profession, new media, contemporary politics, and the post-recession university. Overall, this series was aimed to improve teaching effectiveness while offering a forum for graduate students and faculty. Individuals from a wide range of disciplines attended the workshops, including representatives of the humanities, social sciences, and natural sciences. The Controversial Subjects workshop series was carried out with generous help from Simon Abramowitsch, Dr. Arnold J. Bloom, Christy Cahill, Dr. Bai-Yin Chen, Dr. Teresa Dillinger, Valerie Feldman, Dr. Elizabeth Freeman, Dr. Bruce D. Haynes, Sawyer Kemp, and Duane Wright.

University of California, Davis