conversations with my higher self

8/12/2019 Conversations With My Higher Self

1/207

1

- Dialogues -

Conversations With My Higher SelfKenneth J M MacLean (2002)

If you ask questions directly to your "Higher Self", will it answer back?

That's what freelance writer Ken Macean wanted to find out ! and the

answers he receied back were nothing short of s#ectacular$

%ublished in &&, Dialogues - Conversations With My Higher Self

is already being hailed as one of the great (eta#hysical classics$

Ken discoered that, in res#onse to his (any queries, he started receiing

blocks of thought which he could translate into ty#ed te)t$ *s a result, his

interactions with his "higher self" beca(e al(ost like two good friends

haing a sti(ulating chat$

His "higher self", it see(ed, had access to a ast library of uniersal

knowledge$

He receied answers to to#ics as aried as how to (anifest an e)#ensie

s#orts car #urely through the #ower of thought, to why do #eo#le catch flu, to

what is the #ur#ose of the +nierse itself$ The answers in Dialogues are

often thought!#rooking, so(eti(es controersial and always fascinating$

In this book, you will learn

why ti(e is -ust an illusion of the (ind

how it is #ossible to alter the laws of #hysics


2/207

2

why #lanet .arth is now the (ost i(#ortant #lace to be in the entire

+nierse

what are (e(ories and what causes us to re(e(ber anything

why #eo#le get ill how the +nierse benefits fro( you liing an e)citing, adenturous life

how to co((unicate with, leitate and alter solid ob-ects

why death is actually a -oyful e)#erience

who or what e)isted before the +nierse did

how our current "adanced" ciili/ation is not the first

what really causes (en and wo(en to be attracted to each other

what non!#hysical beings do for fun

$$$and (uch (ore$

Ken has agreed to hae his book (ade freely aailable on %siTek for the

benefit of readers across the globe$

In &0, he created a second olu(e of Dialogueswhich included (ore

questions and answers that he had receied since writing the first book$

Definitions of Soe Jargon Wor!s

I don1t like -argon words but unfortunately, I found (yself using

the( anyway2


3/207

3

"llo#ing *llowing is a letting!in of life force energy, without

resistance$ The default e)#erience for a conscious being, in the

absence of resistant or self3li(iting thought, is a feeling of well3

being$ In life, one allows by aoiding self3criticis( and self3

-udg(ent, as well as criticis( and -udg(ent of others$

Connecte! 4y connected is (eant a #ure -oining to life force

energy, which always results in a feeling of -oy and well3being$

Thought, being a #roduct of consciousness, interfaces directly

with it$ Thought #recedes e(otion5 self3li(iting thought causes a

descent on the e(otional scale5 no3thought and self3su##orting

thought result in #ositie e(otion$

Consciousness Self3awareness5 #ure, #ositie, creatie

#otential$ 6onsciousness is the ani(ating and directing #rinci#le

of the unierse$ 6onsciousness is non3#hysical in nature5

therefore, it is not (easurable, only the #roducts of consciousness

are (easurable$

Disconnecte! engaging in resistant, -udg(ental, or self3li(iting

thought, which causes a descent on the e(otional scale$

$ocus To focus is to center attention, or to #ay attention to$

Strong focus is concentration$ In the dialogues, 7focusing of

consciousness1 (eans the intent for e)#eriencing$ * beetle has a

different life e)#erience than a hu(an, and the intentions for such

a life (ust be different2

Manifestation So(ething tangible, so(ething that e)ists5

usually, a #hysical ob-ect, like a house or a car or (oney5 but it

also refers to a condition or situation, like health, or clarity$

%ative State * non3cor#oreal #ersonality in its true for( and

a##earance$


4/207

4

%on-&hysical 8irtual, non3cor#oreal$ +nable to be ob-ectiely

(easured or detected with #hysical instru(entation$

Source 'nergy %ure, #ositie, life force energy$ Thought

energy, which #roceeds directly fro( consciousness$ It has also

been called chi, #rana, or Ka 9and (any other labels as well:$

iration*%eriodic 9or non3#eriodic: (otion through a (ediu($

;hen you hit a #iano key or #luck a guitar string, it begins to

oscillate back and forth, (oing the (olecules of air around,

generating sound waes$

*n ato( is ibrating internally, because ato(s are


5/207

5

.(otions are a(#lifiers of thought, and sere to boost the

strength of your broadcast signal$

I will often refer to a #erson1s 7ibration,1 (eaning, the su( total

of a #erson1s thoughts, beliefs, and feelings about life$

The totality of a #erson1s thoughts, beliefs and attitudes and

feelings deter(ine #recisely what he or she e)#eriences in life$

This is e)actly the o##osite of what we are taught5 that is, it is

co((only thought that beliefs and feelings are deter(ined by the

7reality1 around us, but this is backwards$ Such a #hiloso#hy

#laces effect before cause$ 6ause is consciousness2 The horse

#ulls the cart, not the other way around$

This idea has been understood for (illennia5 the 4uddha said,

7what we are arises fro( our thoughts$ ;ith our thoughts we

(ake our world$1

+ntro!uction

>or (any years, off and on, I would sit with a #iece of #a#er and

a #en and -ust write down questions, waiting for ins#iration to

strike$ So(eti(es I would -ust write down whateer ca(e into

(y head$ ften these efforts were rewarding, so(eti(es the

results were nonsense$ Then I saw the books fro( @eale Aonald

;alsch, and I saw that his ery #owerful questions generated

answers of ery high clarity$ I figured that ;alsch had done a

definitie -ob of it, and that any efforts fro( (yself would be

redundant$

4ut for the #ast cou#le of years I hae been trying to reconcile

(y understanding of science with that of (eta#hysics5 I reali/ed I


6/207

6

had original questions which Mr$ ;alsch had not asked, so I

decided to sit down at the keyboard and ask the($

I discoered what Mr$ ;alsch discoered5 that is, the (ore

intense the desire for clarity through the asking of the question,

the clearer was the re#ly$

*t first, I was not e)actly sure who or what #roided the answers$

Howeer, I felt a #owerful, #ositie energy surging through (e

during the #rocess of asking the question$ The answers co(e in

the for( of what I can only refer to as a 7#acket1 of co(#lete

understanding$

9ater on in the Aialogues it beca(e clear that what I thought was

(y BHigher SelfC was actually a grou# of beings who are not, at

#resent, #hysically incarnated in #hysical bodies:$

I then translated this understanding as fast as I could into words$

Most of the ti(e I couldn1t kee# u#, but they hae learned to slow

down to (y leel of ty#ing, which isn1t that great$ I also learned

that after I ask the question, I -ust hae to allow the answer to

co(e to (e$ I had to get oer the resistance I felt to so(e of theirre#lies$ So(eti(es their res#onses (ade no sense, or I -ust

disagreed with the($ So I had to learn to acce#t what was co(ing

in, and, een (ore i(#ortant, to not inter-ect (y own cra# into

the (iddle of their (essage$ This was difficult at first, as you

(ay be able to discern as you read the first #ages$ I had to get

oer the urge to saniti/e or (ake logical sense of the re#lies$

;hen I was able to do this, I was always sur#rised at what ca(e

out$ So(eti(es they would -ust re(ind (e of stuff that wasalready sitting in (y (ind, but which I had not connected in the

#ro#er way to the question I had asked$ *t other ti(es, there was

a co(#letely new understanding 9at least for (e: that ca(e forth$

So(eti(es the energy fro( the( ca(e through (e so strongly it

was like being in the (iddle of a gigantic rush of bliss$ It feels


7/207

7

like co(#lete e)cite(ent, e)hilaration, and it is totally #ositie$

The co((on deno(inator of this energy is utter and co(#lete

well being$ That is the only way I can state it in words$ Their

certainty that all is well, not -ust well, but blissfully #erfect,

e)hilarating, wonderful, 9etc$: was at first, confusing and

irrational and then, as I beca(e used to it, incredibly

ins#irational$ *s a result of these dialogues, I know now what an

a(a/ing e)#erience death will be$ *ctually, they -ust laugh at

death, for the( it is a ludicrous conce#t$ They say that there is no

death, -ust a transition to another way of #erceiing$ They say that

we are neer unconscious, because when we slee#, we drea(, and

so are #erceiing in the drea( state$ >ro( their #oint of iew,

death is like a scared cat in his first tri# through the cat door$6o(ing in through the gate, going back out through the gate,

that1s what its like entering and e)iting the body, but they say the

e)#erience of e)iting is so blissful, you will laugh at yourself

once you get on the 7other side1 at any fear you had about the

death #rocess$

I hae a feeling these guys ca(e to (e in res#onse to (y desire

for knowledge$ I a( the sort of bloke who does not care who orhow I get infor(ation5 if it (akes sense, that is good enough for

(e$ It is easy to trust the content of their (essages, because, as I

said before, it co(es with a feeling of co(#lete and utter

certainty$ The only uncertainty is (y translation of it2

I call the( 7guys1 or 7the(1 because it feels like there is a

consciousness that is res#onding to (e, but not a single #erson$

*t first I didn1t differentiate between the(, because I couldn1t,

really, and also because it wasn1t i(#ortant to (e$ It was onlylater that I was able to get the indiidual (e(bers of the grou#$

Their e(otions run fro( the sarcastic to the childish, but (ostly I

feel a sense of co(#lete certainty, and of -oy, when I a( in full

co((unication with the($


8/207

8

I cannot categori/e the(, because, as they say, any categori/ation

is a label, and they do not want to be li(ited in that fashion$ In

so(e ways they feel si(ilar to the beings who call the(seles

7*braha(,1 but in (any ways they are co(#letely different$

If it1s K with the(, its K with (e$ *ll I care about are the

res#onses, and that great rush of #ositie energy I feel2

I a( not clai(ing that anything in this book is The Truth$ I

beliee that Truth is so(ething unique and #ersonal to each

conscious being, but I also beliee that there are funda(ental

#rinci#les u#on which the unierse is based, and u#on which it

has been constructed5 and I hae found their res#onses to (yquestions to be quite enlightening on that to#ic$

There are those reading this who will understand (ore fully than

I, the res#onses I a( getting$ So #lease forward to (e your

understanding if you feel you hae anything #rofound or

significant to add$

I ho#e that these dialogues will be hel#ful to you in clearing u#

so(e of life1s (ysteries5 or, at least, that you will find the(entertaining$

,ie an! Higher Diensions

Session 1

Does everything that has ever been since the beginning

of the universe still exist? In other words, could I go

bac in ti!e and see !y grandfather? Scientists are

s"eculating that ti!e travel !ay be actually be


9/207

9

"ossible# I guess I$! asing you if there are "arallel

universes#

Dour co((unication is a little fu//y$ ;e will res#ond in generalby saying that there e)ists a #otential fro( which you #erceie

and which then beco(es your reality in eery conscious (o(ent$

Surrounding eery conscious being is a set of #ossibilities that

(ay (anifest fro( the #otential sou# of uniersal energy$ Eeality

is (anufactured when you actiate one of the #ossibilities$ In

other words, with your conscious choices you are grabbing a

#otential and (aking it 7real1 to you$ The #ossibilities for your

future e)#erience actually e)ist energetically and can be

(easured$ .ery one of you is a orte) of trans(itting and

receiing energy$

The (atter and energy of the body of your grandfather, for

e)a(#le, and all of the things that hae eer e)isted, has si(#ly

changed its for($ Dou know this as the law of conseration of

energy$ .nergy is si(#ly recycled, that is all$

H!!%but what ha""ened to the earth that !ygrandfather lived in? Did it &ust !elt bac into the

"otential?

It has been transfor(ed$ @ew #ossibilities hae (anifested fro(

the #otential$ The things that e)isted in your grandfather1s ti(e

hae been re3arranged to confor( to the new thought that e)ists

in your ti(e$ There is new thought because there are newly

incarnated beings u#on your earth, who co(e with differentintentions$ @ew intentions generate new (anifestations and so the

face of your #lanet changes$ *ll of it results fro( the changing

thought of the consciousness inhabiting your world$

What is this "otential you s"ea of?


10/207


11/207

11

usually can$t re!e!ber what they had for breafast

three days ago, can acco!"lish that#

That is correct$ Hu(an beings incarnate into a #hysical uniersethat is set u# to be e)#erienced in a s#ecific way$ The set3u#s

hae been #re#ared for you before you arried$

y who!?

4y you2 Dou are an as#ect of a uniersal consciousness that has

created the unierse and eerything in it2 Ee(e(ber that

although it was your intention, your hu(an #ers#ectie is

seerely li(ited$ The eolution of a #lanetary eniron(ent is acoo#eratie effort of consciousness$ The #lanet itself is also

conscious$ Fust as a hu(an (ay affect the body1s syste(s through

thought, so too can the earth affect its own syste(s$

So we exist in a very co!"lex !atrix which has been

"rovided for us and which creates the .default earth$

which we then, on an individual basis, !odify with our

own thoughts and actions?

Des$ The (atri) of creation e)ists, and the interaction between all

of you (odify the co((on s#ace you lie in, and each of you

(odify that to suit your needs$ The aw of *ttraction (anages

the interaction according to the ibration, or frequency, of your

requests and your choices$

*nd reali/e that hu(ans are not the only consciousness on the#lanet$ Hu(ans are like iruses in the body of a ery co(#le)

earth with (any, (any life for(s, (any of which you cannot

#erceie, or do not consider to be life for(s at all$

/iruses?


12/207

12

8iruses in the sense that a irus can (utate, change itself and

affect its eniron(ent$

+hat still doesn$t answer !y original about ti!e# I

want to now if there is an inde"endent ti!e

di!ension that contains all of the !o!ents of

existence there ever was, which would enable us to go

bac or forward in ti!e and relive the!#

The question of ti(e is a question of #otential un(anifested, and

#otential (anifested$ *t each #oint in s#aceGti(e there are

different #otentials (anifested, a(ong an infinity of #ossibilities$

%hysical hu(ans can only interface with the (anifested #otentials

within the 7window1 that their sensory equi#(ent allows$ Dour

eyes and ears, for e)a(#le, only receie a ery li(ited a(ount of

infor(ation$

Ti(e results fro( the (oe(ent of ob-ects in s#ace$ Dour

#erce#tion of that (oe(ent is de#endent on the #hysical body

you are associating with$ >or e)a(#le, a ery s(all organis(with a short life s#an 9relatie to hu(ans: (ight 7sa(#le1 (uch

(ore quickly than a tree, which can lie hundreds of years$ The

birds you obsere fro( your #orch hae a (uch different

#erce#tion of the world, een though you sit not ten feet away$

Therefore, the sensory equi#(ent of the body largely deter(ines

how ti(e is e)#erienced$

Howeer, consciousness itself is also a factor$ Dou say 7ti(e is

dragging1 or, 7I can1t beliee it1s o1clock already$1 That is

consciousness itself re3inter#reting ti(e$ et1s say you take your

wife to a football ga(e$ >or you the whole thing is oer (uch too

quickly but for her, the e)#erience was inter(inable$ So ti(e (ay


13/207

13

be e)#erienced differently de#ending u#on the organis( which is

e)#eriencing, and the consciousness associated with it$

Dou regard ti(e as a fi)ed continuu(, but it is not fi)ed$ Ti(e is

always sub-ectie to the #erceier$

*ou see! to be saying that hu!ans, and science, are

only aware of a very s!all "ortion of a !uch vaster

universe# *ou also see! to be saying that it is

i!"ossible to really now how it all wors ob&ectively#

Des$ That is the intention$ * li(ited range of #erce#tion

sti(ulates curiosity and desire, and allows for a dierse range of

e)#eriences$ If all is known there is nothing to learn, nothing to

inestigate2 The #hysical body auto(atically filters #erce#tion of

the all3that3is$ Dou will discoer this ery #owerfully when you

release your association with the body$

01# ac to !y )uestion# Do "arallel universes exist?

Can we travel bac and forth in ti!e? I$d really lie to

go bac in ti!e and give !y father so!e hel"ful

"arental advice about bringing !e u"#

* #arallel unierse (ight be defined as a #otential that (ay or

(ay not hae (anifested$ Dour idea considers * #otentials as

haing (anifested2

So all potentials do not manifest?

;hat (anifests is what is e)#erienced2 ;hat is not e)#erienced

re(ains a #otential$ >or e)a(#le, you a##ly for a new -ob and do

not get it$ ;hat is the (anifestation, and what is the #otential?

The #otential was for you to get the -ob, or not to get it$ ;hat

(anifested was that you did not get the -ob$ So you continue to


14/207

14

lie your life in your #resent -ob$ Dou cannot say that what

(anifested was both that you got the -ob, and that you did not2

;hat (anifests is what is e)#erienced2 If your e)#erience is not

getting the -ob, that is the reality for you$ The idea of #arallel

unierses says that you got the -ob and you did not get the -ob,

and that the unierse in which you got the -ob is -ust as real as the

unierse that you are e)#eriencing, and you are in both of the(,

consciously self aware in two se#arate unierses$ 4ut you are

you, not so(eone else2 Dou are an as#ect of uniersal

consciousness that e)ists right now, and you are aware of yourself

e)#eriencing where you are right now$ The #arallel unierse

conce#t requires not only a bifurcation or branching of unierses,

but also of consciousness$ Dou cannot be e)#eriencing in aunierse where you e)#erienced so(ething, and also in one

where you did not2 therwise, you would not be you, because

what is real to you is what you e)#erience, do you see? The

unierse in which you got the new -ob was -ust a #otential that

did not (anifest, and so was not e)#erienced$

* (anifestation is -ust a conscious being e)#eriencing so(ething,

feeling so(ething, #erceiing so(ething, and a #otential isso(ething that had a #ossibility of being e)#erienced, but wasn1t$

+hat$s "retty definitive# *ou$re saying "arallel

universes do not exist# However, if the universe is

infinite, I don$t see why not# *ou$re also i!"lying that

ti!e travel is i!"ossible#

Ti(e trael in the sense that you (ean, a #hysical transfer to a#hysical unierse location in s#aceGti(e that has been #reiously

e)#erienced, is i(#ossible$

Why?


15/207

15

It inoles understanding of the idea of @;$ *ll e)#erience

occurs @;, and can neer be du#licated or re#licated$ Here is

an e)a(#le we gae you earlier that you included in your noel$

01, that clears things u" a little, anyway# 2ow for !y

next )uestion'

(re there !ore than 3 s"atial di!ensions? 0r does the

all4that4is &ust contain a vast a!ount of energy that is

not detectable to our hu!an senses and the

instru!ents of science?

Aefine (ore clearly what you (ean$

Height, width and breadth are 3 di!ensions# ( 5th

s"atial di!ension re)uires one added direction 6a

.hy"er$ di!ension7 in addition to length, width, and

height, &ust lie a 3rd s"atial di!ension involves an

added direction 6height7 fro! length and width# If

higher s"atial di!ensions exist, they could contain an

infinite nu!ber of 3 di!ensional universes, and so the

idea of "arallel universes !ight be "ossible# So!e

scientists say that in order to account for the total

!ass of the universe, energy has to be stored in

.higher di!ensions$ that we cannot "erceive fro! our

3 di!ensional "ers"ective#

Dou cannot talk about di(ension without talking about

#erce#tion$ * 7higher di(ension1 is -ust another way of saying 7I

a( #erceiing differently$1 >ro( your #hysical #ers#ectie you

hae a li(ited iew of the all3that3is$ Things you cannot


16/207

16

#hysically #erceie but can i(agine are naturally #laced in

i(aginary di(ensions$

;hen consciousness associates with a biological body on your

#lanet 9or any #lanet:, you gie u# so(e of your broader

awareness$ >ro( your #hysical iew#oint you (ay call this

broader #ers#ectie another 7di(ension1 if you want to$ Dou (ay

call it a s#atial di(ension or another 7#lane1 of e)istence or label

it in any way you wish$ @o (atter what you call it, it is -ust a

different way of #erceiing$

;hat we really want to get across to you, is that I> D+ 6*@

%.E6.I8. IT, IT IS E.*$ *nd if you cannot, it isn1t real2 Thatshould take care of a lot of other questions on the sub-ect of

di(ension$

%lacing a label on so(ething and atte(#ting to quantify it and

e)#lain it to death and #igeonhole it, is a ery a(using trait

hu(ans hae$ Then when you think you hae it all e)#lained, you

write equations to deter(ine its relationshi# to all of you

foreer(ore and then you continually create it that way, so that it

beco(es (ore and (ore real to all of you$ Then you beco(e the

slae of it2 4ecause it is being obsered oer and oer, it (ust be

true5 but it is only true because you create it as true in eery

instant, which gets back to what we said before$

So there really is no 5th s"atial di!ension?

There can be, if you can #erceie differently$ Dou can call it

whateer you like$

01, then how do you change your "erce"tion to

"erceive a 5th di!ensional ob&ect?


17/207

17

That is u# to you$ *nything is #ossible, if you desire the

e)#erience and allow it to ha##en$ There aren1t ery (any of you

who are willing to do that, and those that do either think they are

cra/y, or others label the( as cra/y or nuts, because they are

#erceiing so ery differently fro( the rest of you$

Dou see, it is all u# to you$ That is the (essage we really want to

get across to you$ There is an infinite #otential which can be

(anifested in infinite ways, it all de#ends u#on your i(agination

and your desire and ision$

01 enough for tonight# !ore to!orrow#

More n ,ieSession 2

8et !e get bac once !ore to the idea of ti!e, and

ti!e travel# 8et$s say a being has a lifeti!e in 9:33

where he was nown as .;oe,$ and another lifeti!e in

:


18/207


19/207


20/207

20

9s(iles: ;hat we are saying is that %ete and Foe e)#erience their

lies in an eternal (o(ent called @;, but that it is not #ossible

for a #hysical %ete to trael #hysically back in ti(e and (eet a

#hysical Foe$ The body of Foe has retuned to the #otential2 %ete

and Foe, as as#ects or e)#ressions of a uniersal consciousness,

(ay of course share, relie and relate their e)#eriences$ 4ut this

sharing and reliing is itself occurring @;$

01, I thin I see, sort of# What you see! to be saying

is that there is no inde"endent ti!e di!ension, but

this is in disagree!ent with relativity and )uantu!

!echanics, which rely on ti!e as a 5th di!ension toex"lain what we "erceive in our universe#

;ell, we are not trying to tell you what you should beliee2 ;e

are atte(#ting to answer your questions as best we can$ ;hat you

hae (anifested u#on your #lanet and in your societies are an

e)act (atch to the thoughts and beliefs in those societies2 ;e

assure you, the society of the 4ush(en in *frica are (uch

different than the society in the +nited States$ *nd the society of

the acade(ic scientific co((unity is (uch, (uch different fro(

that of construction workers$ Dou could certainly say, if you went

to *frica and isited with our friends the 4ush(en, that they

lied in a different ti(e, could you not? Dou (ight then say that

there are different 7ti(e di(ensions1 coe)isting within and u#on

each other all oer your #lanet2

Ti(e as you refer to it is -ust the decision to organi/e thought in a

different way, which results in different obserable conditions$

;hat has (anifested has been e)#erienced, and re(e(bered, and

it is known$ Those who focused in J& e)#erienced what they

e)#erienced, and there would not be thought organi/ed in such a

#articular way, eer again$ Ao not (ake the (istake of belieing


21/207

21

that there are se#arate lu(#s of consciousness here, and se#arate

lu(#s there$ There is a strea( of consciousness that you hae

been calling uniersal consciousness, which decides to 4. in

(any different ways, and which focuses as#ects, or e)tensions of

itself into hu(an bodies on earth 9and (any other #laces as well:$

*ll is inti(ately connected2

The e)#eriential reality called J& has been thoroughly ingested

and digested, as it were, and so it is not necessary to re#eat it,

eer again2 ;e like ariety, you see$

Hu(ans (ight find it fascinating to think about traeling in ti(e

to so(e #lace that has already been e)#erienced, but fro( yourbroader awareness you decided to e)#erience now, in this energy,

and you did not wish to rehash old e)#eriences$

ut traveling in ti!e would be a wonderful new

ex"erience'' It is &ust a "ossible "otential reality, isn$t

it?

9s(iles: Indeed it is2 4ut you (ust re(e(ber that hu(ans are not

the only life for(s that e)ist2 ;hat about the birds and the rocks

and the insects and the fish and the grains of sand, where are all

of these life for(s and things? In order to trael in ti(e you (ust

hae thought organi/ed e)actly the way it was, in eery instant

that you e)#erience this old ti(e, and so (ust hae the agree(ent

of all to essentially recreate the sa(e #atterns of thought and

ibration$ ;e assure you, thought has eoled since J& on your

#lanet, and it would not be #ossible to organi/e it in e)actly the

sa(e way again$

*es, but I can i!agine ti!e travel and an inde"endent

ti!e di!ension, and if it can be i!agined, it should be

"ossible# +hat$s what I have read fro! other


22/207

22

channelers, anyway' It should be "ossible to travel bac

to any ti!e that exists in the "otential of thought, if all

is as you say# I guess !y )uestion is, is there a

universal record of all that has been ex"erienced, so

that it can be re-ex"erienced?

There is the e)#erience and there is the i(#ression of the

e)#erience that can be recalled$ *ll that has eer been

e)#erienced is recallable$ In that sense ti(e trael is #ossible, for

it is always #ossible to relie an e)#erience$ *nd it is #ossible to

recall the e)#erience in #erfect detail and change the

circu(stances of the e)#erience$ So it is #ossible to change the#ast, as it were$

Is it #ossible to recreate 9recall or drea(: an e)#erience and

#erceie it as intensely as you can when in a #hysical body?

So(eti(es it is2 9Eecall the night(are you had last week:$ How

7real1 can a drea( be? These questions are e)actly what weGyou

asked ourseles when we considered the question 7How is it

#ossible to (ake e)#eriences (ore real, (ore e)citing, (ore

intense?1 The answer was the creation of the #hysical unierse2

If you ask yourself, 7why was the night(are so real?1 the answer

is, 7because it was based on an actual #hysical e)#erience$1

Area(s are #owerful e)#eriences, but not so #owerful as the

carefully constructed configuration called 7#hysical unierse$1

In discussing ti(e trael there is the difficulty that consciousness

does not ;*@T to re!e)#erience2 ;e want to grow, eole,beco(e (ore2 ;e don1t want to go back to J& and relie that

old stuff, and you, in your broader awareness, would really not

like to do so either, we assure you2 That is why you are

e)#eriencing now, right where you are$ .n-oy yourself222 Dou

see, (any hu(ans think fondly about ti(e trael with the idea


23/207

23

that it would be nice to get away fro( their troubles$ The idea is

7oh, it would be so nice to go to J&, I wouldn1t hae to worry

about (oney or that -erk I hae for a boss, or (y father3in3law,

or all of (y #roble(s$1 4ut consider5 when you are feeling

wonderful, you would not like to be anywhere else than where

you are right at the (o(ent$ 4ecause it -ust feels so wonderful to

be alie2 It is that delicious feeling of loing life in the (o(ent

that is the reason for all e)#erience$

;e see you ob-ecting that ti(e trael, if it were #ossible, (ight

be undertaken fro( an orientation of e)cite(ent and adenture,

and of course this is true, but we want to say to you that there is

#lenty of adenture to be had right where 9and when: you arenow$

More n ,ie &art .

Session 3

6I a! bac to the ti!e thing again# I a! fascinated by

ti!e travel and I don$t want to hear that it$s not

"ossible'7 01, if there is a universal "otential of

infinite energy, as you have !entioned, then it see!s

to !e that 9:33 and :


24/207

24

for(, and (anifestation$ Dou see the ta#estry in a constant state

of flu)5 it is neer, can neer be the sa(e twice$ Dou #erceie the

ta#estry as eternal and know eery sensation and e)#erience that

has eer occurred5 but you also know that the #oignant (o(ent

of any #erce#tion, sensation, or e)#erience is unique$ The

ta#estry is in a state of continual (odification$ It is easy to take

sna#shots or i(#ressions of the ta#estry and know it in fullness,

but it is not #ossible to eer rearrange the ta#estry to confor( to

an indiidual sna#shot5 that is because consciousness unierse3

wide has free will and the decisions it (akes are always different$

Dour conce#tion of a #arallel unierse is si(#ly another way to

organi/e thought and to #erceie$ Dou (ay label that a 7#arallelunierse1 or an 7alternate reality1 or a different 7di(ension,1

whateer (akes you feel better2

Dou see, it (akes no difference what you call it$ 4y labeling

so(ething you do not increase your understanding of it, you

si(#ly li(it it$ In trying to understand so(ething you (ust also

li(it it, because you (ust confine it to a bundle of thought that

(akes sense to you at your leel of #erce#tion and awareness$

* label is a definition of so(ething$ It is a fi)ing of ibrational

intent to a certain #attern of frequencies, which will then (anifest

that way for you out of the #otential$ So by labeling so(ething

you define it$ Then you get confused because you atte(#t to

e)tra#olate the whole fro( the #lace of li(itation$ It is not

#ossible to fully understand what we hae said until you release

your ery strong association with the #hysical e)#erience$ *s we

said before, the intent of a #hysical incarnation is the intensifyingof e)#erience$ *cco(#anying a #hysical e)#erience is an 9al(ost

ineitable: loss of understanding of the whole$ In hu(an for(

you si(#ly do not hae the ability to #erceie the fullness of all3

that3is$


25/207

25

01 I see that I a! asing a )uestion fro! a li!ited

view"oint, and that I a! never going to get an answer

that is satisfying#

f course not, for you are trying to get The *nswer which will be

true foreer, and that cannot ha##en$ Eather than trying to figure

it all out, try -ust en-oying the e)#erience of liing2

The unierse is eternal and can neer be whittled down to a few

funda(ental ideas or ele(ents$ It is growing and e)#anding and

dyna(ic$

Dou are neer going to figure it all out$

If the unierse eer got to the #oint where it was all done, all

e)#lained, eeryone in it would turn the lights out and leae2 If

you eer figured it all out, it wouldn1t be growing any(ore$

The unierse grows because consciousness is continually creating

new thought and (anifesting new e)#eriences fro( the #otential$

That1s what (akes it so fun2 There is far (ore ahead of you than

behind you$

01 we have co!e full circle# I still have the sa!e

)uestions I have before, es"ecially, about ti!e#

That is because you are writing your scri#t as you go along$ If

you beliee that ti(e is like another s#atial di(ension, and

enough of you on earth agree to that, then you (ay define

whateer you want to (anifest out of the #otential, and call itanything you want, and e)#erience it$ The thing we want you to

understand is that D+ * *E. 6E.*TI@O D+E ;@

.%[email protected]$ *s #hysical beings you cannot recreate the

entire unierse, but you hae the ability to (odify what is already

there$ Dou (ay call forth out of the energy sou# anything you


26/207

26

would like$ Dou are in control, you are the designers of your

e)#erience$ @o one else is doing it to you or for you$ Ood is not

i(#osing itself into your e)#erience$ There is no EIOHT answer2

There is -ust the o##ortunity to call forth new e)#eriences,

eternally$ *nd you get to decide what those e)#eriences are$

+han you#

Science

Session 3A

Science atte!"ts to figure out the laws of the universe#

ro! your "oint of view, what is science?

*s hu(ans hae defined it, science is based u#on obseration of

what has already been (anifested fro( the #otential$ It is a ery

good way to deter(ine the history of thought, and the design of

the unierse >EM D+E H+M*@ %.ES%.6TI8., but hard

science is based only u#on obseration of what3already3is$

*ccording to science, only that which can be #erceied andGor

de(onstrated right now is alid$ In other words, a scientist says

7I hae an idea about $ I will do an e)#eri(ent to test whether

(y idea is alid$1

;hat the scientist will do is to conduct an e)#eri(ent to see if

can be (anifested, or has already been (anifested 9i$e$, can it be

obsered:$ If the scientist cannot obsere it, he then considers thatidea is inalid2

Howeer, what the scientist is (issing is his conscious

connection to the #otential$ If a scientist originates an idea and

tests it, he begins (anifesting i((ediately fro( the #otential$


27/207

27

The unierse begins to res#ond to his intent, through thought, and

(atches hi( u# with data, energy and #eo#le of like ibration$ To

then say that since he has not yet obsered idea in (anifested

for(, therefore idea is inalid is like saying the water will not

co(e out of the garden hose because after & seconds the water

has not been obsered2 ;hen the scientist sits before his

e)#eri(ent he is co3creating in a sea of thought, an ocean of

#otential energy$ The scientist1s ideas for the outco(e of the

e)#eri(ent, along with the #reiously organi/ed and agreed3

u#on thought eerywhere in the unierse, for( the #ossible

#otentials and direct the eentual (anifestation of it$

This is how the eolution of science occurs, by gradually co(ingu# with new ideas, agreeing to the(, and then either re-ecting

the(, thus #reenting their (anifestation, or (anifesting the($

The (ore agree(ent on an idea by (ore conscious beings, the

stronger the ibrational signal sent to the #otential, and so the

bigger is the resultant (anifestation, which is always an e)act

(atch to the sending signal$

bseration is #erce#tion of what3is 9already (anifested:$ *

thought is by definition a creation because it is a #acket 9albeit

ery tiny: of energy$ * thought adds to the total energy of the

unierse$ Therefore, conscious beings contribute to the

eole(ent of the unierse$ Dou see, hu(ankind has it (ostly

backwards$ 6onsciousness created the unierse to #lay in it$ The

unierse was designed so that beings could alter it at will and so

e)#erience new things$ That1s the fun of it2 If the unierse were

-ust a static #lace, an eniron(ent where eerything has alreadybeen figured out in adance, there would be no #oint$ It would be

like a ha(ster on a tread(ill, continually doing the sa(e things

oer and oer$ ;e are here to tell you that the unierse is not like

that$ It is an eternally e)#anding #layground$


28/207

28

So trying to figure everything out is "ointless?

It is not #ointless if it gies you -oy$ 4ut as soon as you think you

hae it all figured out, so(e new idea occurs to you and new

e)#eriences result fro( that new thought$ ook at what ha##ened

in science at the end of the Jor

e)a(#le, your science says that the chair you sit on is co(#osed

of ato(s and ato(s are co(#osed of s(aller #articles and those

#articles are co(#osed of still s(aller #articles$ .entually you

reach the leel of thought$

* thought is a direct creation of consciousness and so it is the

(ost funda(ental #erceiable unit or quanta$

.ach thought can be considered to be a 7ibration,1 or

co(bination of 7ibrations$1 ;e use the word ibration because it

is the closest word you hae in your language to describe the

essence of alieness$ In your scientific (odel, ato(s and the

#articles that co(#rise the( are constantly (oing, oscillating


29/207

29

within the(seles, so the word 7ibration1 is a good one$

Thoughts are ibrational because they are alie, and they are alie

because they are ibrational$ * circular definition, but accurate$

01, but then what is consciousness? Is it energy?

6onsciousness is that which creates thought and #erceies what it

has created$ 6onsciousness creates ibrationally, and the unierse

of its creation is #erceied or inter#reted ibrationally$ 8ibration

is inti(ate to #erce#tion5 and all things #hysical, or #erceiable,

are ibrational in nature$ 6onsciousness, like a radio tuned to a

s#ecific station, has the ability to focus ibrationally and

#erceie$

So then, consciousness and thought are the sa!e

thing?

.ssentially, yes$ Dou are trying to differentiate and se#arate

things that are not really se#arate, but which (ust be

differentiated, otherwise you would not hae a unierse at all2

Dou see the whole thing is refle)ie, co(ing back in on itself$

.)istence is the creation of consciousness, and reflects the eternal

and self3refle)ie nature of consciousness$ .)istence is si(#ly

#erce#tion$ %erce#tion requires so(ething to #erceie, and that

7thing1 is thought, in all of its uni(aginably co(#le) and

beautiful #atterns2 The reason for consciousness, for self3

awareness, is #erce#tion5 for without so(ething to look at,

awareness is #ointless$

There is an inti(ate connection between eerything in e)istenceand consciousness itself$ S#ace is -ust the creation of

consciousness ia thought$ *n ob-ect is co(#osed, ulti(ately, of

7organi/ed1 thought$ Therefore, s#ace is not e(#ty$ It is filled

with the ibrations that consciousness has created$ It is alie2


30/207

30

Matter and energy are si(#ly different co(binations of thought

into arious geo(etrical arrange(ents$

So you see, fro( your #oint of iew our e)#lanations are always

circular$ ;e always wind u# saying essentially the sa(e thing,

oer and oer, in different words and by taking different routes$

>or your understanding, the truth is a circle begin and end are at

the sa(e #oint, yet once the circle is co(#leted there is no begin

and end$

Is the universe closed, o"en, or saddle-sha"ed?

It is whateer you are #erceiing fro( your ibrational antage#oint$ Dou see, it all de#ends u#on your #oint of iewGleel of

consciousness$ Hae you eer noticed that when you increase

your awareness you #erceie differently? ;hen you were a child,

the street you lied on see(ed like the whole world5 eerything

that ha##ened was contained within it$ ;hen you entered school

the world see(ed to e)#and radically, and it took you a while to

ad-ust$ *s you change your ideas about the unierse you e)#and

your awareness of it, and it in turn changes to (atch your

#references$

(re we !erely observing the universe, or creating it?

4oth$ Ee(e(ber that fro( your hu(an iew#oint, your

conce#tion of the unierse (ust be li(ited$ That is because

consciousness, when it beco(es associated with #hysical bodies,

#erceies through the body1s li(iting senses$ Therefore, you are

only #erceiing a (iniscule #ortion of the unierse$

01# What is this "otential you ee" taling about?

The #otential is the irtual 7sou#1 of ibration, or #otential

energy, out of which anything you desire to e)#erience (ay be


31/207

31

called forth$ It is 33 we will say in ter(s you can understand 33

the co(bined thought fro( consciousness since the beginning of

the unierse$

It sounds lie !agic#

It IS (agic2 4ut hu(ans li(it the(seles to a tiny fraction of

their true #otential$ This is because of the habit you hae of

wanting to only consider alid that which has already (anifested

and that which is obserable5 also, your habit of wanting to label

eerything and get it figured out for all ti(e$ Hu(ans are fond of

#ro#osing laws of nature 9and hu(an behaior: that (ust be fi)ed

for all ti(e$ If so(eone changes his or her behaior #atterns, youcall that #erson 7inconsistent,1 or 7i(#ulsie,1 but the ability to

change your (ind is a quintessential #ro#erty of consciousness$

6onsistent behaior is often robotic, or un(indful behaior$

If only you could reali/e the true #otential of hu(an nature2 Dou

would all be astounded at what you are #otentially ca#able of$

4ut of course this is understandable since you are all out here on

the leading edge of e)#erience$ Dou are li(ited greatly by yourhu(an sensors$ So you are able to #erceie only a tiny fraction of

eerything!that!is, as we hae (entioned before$ 4ut we are here

to re(ind you that you are far (ore than you hae led yourseles

to beliee$

*es but what you are saying is that we are ca"able of

anything# +hat$s ridiculous# We can$t instantly

!anifest out of this "otential anything we would wish#

If that were true I$d have a cou"le billion dollars'

@ot with your #resent state of consciousness$

(re you saying its "ossible?


32/207

32

*nything is #ossible$ 4ut first you (ust change your state of

being$

01, I get your drift# *ou can$t &ust sna" your fingers

and get what you want# *ou actually have to wor for

it#

;ell, your work is the align(ent of your own energy to what you

desire$ The ibrational (atching #ro#erty of the unierse assists

you, and it is ery #owerful assistance, we assure you$ That1s a

lot different than running around like a chicken with your head

cut off, engaging in actions that are not aligned to the goal$

,he 'arth &laneSession 5

So basically what you are saying is that there is no

AIH+ answer#

That is correct2 * right answer would be defined by (any

hu(ans as so(ething that has (anifested, or that will be true

foreer$ 4ut it is #ossible to (anifest anything fro( the #otential$

So eerything has the #otential to be right$

01, I a! beginning to see now# When we say so!eone

is wrong, what we are saying is that he or she has not

yet !anifested his idea#

r, that he has not gotten broad agree(ent fro( other hu(ans

u#on that idea$


33/207

33

*s (ore and (ore beings agree on 7*,1 the (ore #owerful is the

drawing forth fro( the #otential$ The (ore who (anifest 7*,1 the

(ore it is agreed u#on as alid$ *nything at all can be

(anifested, and is being (anifested, in worlds and di(ensions

totally beyond your understanding2 The unierse is so ast and so

wonderful2 9Here I felt a #owerful sensation$ I can only describe

it is a fresh bree/e 33 an e)citing feeling of creatie #ower:$

So we can su! u" by saying that life exists in a vast

ocean of infinite "otential, and that we can ex"erience

anything we want#

That is a good way to describe it$ *s a final thought, we would

like to say do not li(it yourself2 +se your creatie #ower to

-oyfully (anifest your drea(s$

*nd also we would like to say the unierse is a -oyful #lace2 It is

a #lace of indescribable beauty$ If it were not, there would be no

#oint in e)#eriencing it$ Hu(ans loe to struggle, but we assure

you, that is not a conce#t shared throughout the all3that3 is$ 4ut

of course that is why this #lace is so interesting2

Dou are not here learning lessons$ Dou ca(e here to -oyfully

create and (anifest2

I res"ectfully disagree# +he earth is a "lace of "ain

and struggle' What$s the "oint of having a "lace lie

earth in a universe which you clai! is one of &oy? I

have heard it said that earth is the du!"ing ground fornegative stuff fro! everywhere in the universe, because

no one nows what to do with it# I have also heard it

said that hu!an beings are lie arbary Coast "irates


34/207

34

sent here to wor off our bed ar!a# oth of these

ex"lanations !ae so!e sense#

;e see you (odified your thought fro( 7I see so (uch #ain andstruggle1 to 7there is so (uch #ain and struggle$1 ;e know why

you did this, and so do you because when you begin to connect

with the #owerful energy of creation you begin to resonate (ore

and (ore with -oy, and in your life you begin to see (ore and

(ore -oy, (ore and (ore #ros#erity, and less and less struggle

and #ain$ If the unierse were a #lace of #ain, this could neer

ha##en$ The default condition eerywhere in the unierse, in all

di(ensions of #erce#tion, is -oy, beauty, and loe$ These feelings

are woen into the ery fabric of e)istence$

7@egatie energy1 does not e)ist$ ;hat feels negatie is -ust

resistance to the #ositie life force$

;hen you get into trouble it is always because of your attention

to it$ Thoughts of unworthiness or self denial are not in consort

with the true nature of consciousness$ ife force energy is #ure

and #ositie and co(es with a feeling of well3 being$ The feelingof 7negatie energy1 is -ust the inherent nature of your ery being

screa(ing to you that your thoughts and beliefs and ideas about

yourself are inconsistent with your ery nature$

*es, that$s very good, but why do so !any struggle? (

fa!ous writer asserts that a controlling grou" of

entities !ani"ulate the thought4s"ace around earth

fro! a higher di!ension# It does see! that !assconsciousness is co!"osed of !ostly negative ideas

and li!iting beliefs#

The answer to this is that you (ay (anifest anything you would

like fro( the #otential, and the aw of *ttraction will bring to


35/207

35

you beings, energies, and conditions to (atch your thoughts,

beliefs and feelings$ The state of affairs on #lanet earth is always

an e)act (atch to the collectie consciousness of the beings u#on

it$

*es, but if that consciousness were to be affected by

others? y the insertion or .i!"lantation$ of negative

ideas in order to facilitate control and do!ination?

*gain, only those thoughts, beliefs, energies and beings that hae

been inited can co(e to you$ That is how the unierse has been

designed$ The unierse has been designed to allow all

e)#eriences, all thought, all feeling$ This is a unierse of free3

will and attraction$

So you are saying that I> there are hostile beings fro( other

#lanets or di(ensions, we hae inited the(?

That1s right$

ut do these off-"lanet beings exist? (re there beings

6who! we invited7 who are wreaing havoc with the

"otential around our "lanet?

.ery being that is on, in or around the earth is here according to

a 7(i) and (atch1 of ibrational intent$ It is all in #erfect balance,

and in a constant change of flu)$ If the #eo#le of earth would like

to change their collectie e)#erience, all that is necessary is to

change thought, to choose differently$

What if I want to change !y ex"erience and the other

billion don$t?

Then your e)#erience will change and theirs will not$ ife is not a

/ero3su( ga(e$ Dou hae touched on that in so(e of your


36/207

36

essays$ There is an infinite sea of #otential which can be accessed

fro( anywhere in the unierse$ Dour #ros#erity is de#endent

u#on how (uch you ask for it, and how (uch you allow it$ The

#redo(inant belief on earth for (ost is one of scarcity$ Most do

not ask for #ros#erity, thinking that it is not #ossible$

*s we said to .sther, if you are healthy, do you de#rie another

of health? If you beco(e ill, does the health you would hae had

transfer to so(eone else?

If you are intelligent, does that (ean so(eone else (ust be

stu#id? Ao you say, 7I will be confused for a few weeks and

allow others to be s(art?1 It -ust doesn1t work that way2 Theunierse is infinitely abundant in all things and in order to en-oy

that abundance, all you (ust do is ask for it, and allow it to co(e

to you$

01# So the .earth is a "rison and hu!ans are the

in!ates and higher di!ensional beings are the

wardens$ is not true?

There are beings of all ty#es and energies on, in and around your

#lanet$ There is no -ail and warden scenario, because all of you

hae free will and can ask and receie anything you want$ If you

find yourself in #rison, you hae oluntarily co((itted yourself2

K, I a( really getting the idea$ There is -ust free will$ .ery

ti(e I say a negatie, you turn it around and #ut a #ositie s#in on

it$

9aughing: ;ell that is because the unierse IS #ositie2 Dour

negatie ideas are -ust resistance to the natural, inherent, benign

state of the unierse2


37/207

37

6Here the thought for!s, energy, ins"iration,

whatever you want to call it, sto""ed, so I will end off

for now7#

,he La#s of "ttraction S ,he La#s of MatterSession 7

6Bditors 2oteE +he 8aw of (ttraction states that .lie

attracts lie#$7#

*ou say that the 8aw of (ttraction is a universal law#

*et a si!"le ex"eri!ent with a battery and two !etal4

"lated s"heres connected by wires will serve to dis"rove

this# If you hoo the two ter!inals of the battery each

to a different s"here hanging by a wire, those s"heres

re"el each other# However, if you connect each s"here

to the sa!e ter!inal of the battery, the s"heres re"el#

+his shows clearly that lie charges re"el, and o""osite

charges attract# +his can also be seen by "lacing the

2orth "ole of two !agnets near each other and

watching the! re"el# How does your state!ent

reconcile with these ex"eri!ental facts?

The #ositie and negatie you refer to are si(#ly as#ects of thesa(e kind of energy$ The charges and ato(s science refers to are

(eta#hors$ *t one #ole there is a sur#lus of energy relatie to the

other #ole$ This creates a tension between the two, which

actiates the s#ace between the( and #roides a #otential$


38/207

38

Science has not yet discoered the inti(ate, co(#letely

interconnected relationshi# between what you call

electro(agnetic energy, graity, light, and what you refer to as

nuclear forces$ ;hen you do, the contradictions and ga#s in your

science will resole$ >or now, acce#t that the law of 7like attracts

like1 is alid for the life e)#erience of eery hu(an and can be

successfully a##lied so that all that you want (ay co(e to you$

Doesn$t sound convincing to !e# If the ato! is a

!eta"hor, then how co!e the sun and "lanets are

arranged exactly according to the ato!ic !odel? (s

above so below, the universe is in balance as you lieto say# +he ato!ic !odel has been able to "recisely

ex"lain so !any "heno!ena and to "redict behavior of

!atter and energy#

*s we said before, (atter and energy are co(#osed, ulti(ately,

of thought$ Therefore, the energy in your subato(ic #articles is

the sa(e, which (eans that the ele(ents in your %eriodic Table

are co(#osed of the sa(e energy, with different internalgeo(etries$ In other words, 7co##er energy1 is not different than

7iron energy21

The #hysical interactions that are obsered are the result of the

collectie agree(ents of consciousness at the #resent ti(e$ In

other ciili/ations on earth, long before the #resent earth

ciili/ation, other cultures had different ideas about (atter and

energy and their conscious relation to the world around the($

These ciili/ations were able to (ani#ulate (atter and energy

with far (ore ease than your #resent ciili/ation$ Dou (ay

attribute that to su#erior understanding of already e)isting

uniersal forces, but we #refer to say that their understanding

drew forth fro( the #otential, different relationshi#s between

(atter, energy and consciousness, different #rogra((ing for the


39/207

39

local s#aceGti(e which establishes the laws of (atter and energy

9#hysics:$

So you$re saying that consciousness can actually alter

the "hysical laws of !atter and energy?

f course2 That is what we hae been saying all along2

It (ay see( absurd to hu(ans on the #lanet earth at this ti(e but

we assure you that the unierse is (assiely aried and contains

realities that you cannot een conceie of$ This is not bad, we are

not critici/ing, but we are a(used at how shocked hu(ans are

when anyone suggests that consciousness (ay alter #hysical lawsor (odify (atter and energy$ That was the whole #oint of

constructing the unierse2

Whenever you say stuff lie that I receive a feeling of

utter certainty, so that !y )uestions see! al!ost

ridiculous, and I feel totally co!"lete with the answer

and I feel that it is correct# +hen when you have

finished answering, I have doubts again# Is this

because I have ex"anded !y awareness by allowing

your energy to co!e to !e, then return to !y nor!al

hu!an state of consciousness?

;hen you co((unicate with us you hae to use your 7s#iritual

sensors$1 @or(ally you -ust use the body1s senses to inter#ret

your world$

4ut all we are saying is that consciousness designed the unierse

so that it could #lay around in it$ That1s not so shocking is it?

9s(iles:$ Is it so shocking that there (ay be #laces with different

#hysical laws than those that can be e)#erienced by hu(ans on

#lanet earth? Most hu(ans would not think so$ The unierse is a


40/207

40

#lace where there are aailable an al(ost infinite ariety of

e)#eriences$

Dou are #hysical and non3#hysical energy$ Dour bodies are

sitting in an energy field that has a co(#le) te(#late for eery

organ and cell$ That energy field is connected with eery other

#article of energy in the unierse, and is inti(ately related to the

#otential itself$ So there is a lot (ore to you than you are aware

of$

It sounds lie we are so li!ited here#

;ith li(itation co(es the ability to transcend that li(itation, the-oy of discoery, the ability to e)#erience intensely$ .erything

on the earth #lane is (agnified (any fold$ ;hen it1s good it1s

really good and when it1s bad it1s really bad$ That is one of the

attractions of this #lace$ 4ut don1t worry$ ;hen you get tired of

this #lace, you -ust transition s(oothly out of it and return to

natie state 33 a condition of -oy and well3being as #ure source

energy$ Dou can1t (ake a (istake2

01, I$! tired# +hans for all of the great info'

More /uestions on La#s of "ttractionSession 8

I would lie a clearer ex"lanation of why o""osite

charges attract in the !icrocos!ic world of !atter

and energy, but the law of .lie attracts lie$ see!s to

a""ly in the area of hu!an relationshi"s# If both

consciousness and !atter are ulti!ately co!"osed of

thought, then there should be no contradiction# (nd a


41/207

41

law can$t be universal if it wors one way with

electrons and "rotons and another way in life#

ook at the structure of your societies and your #o#ular beliefs$;ould you say that the do(inating conce#t was one of har(ony,

loe and abundance, or one of scarcity and conflict? The #ri(ary

actiated the(es in your s#ecies (ass consciousness 33 the

co(bined thought for(s of all hu(ans 33 could be categori/ed as

one of o##osition and conflict 9our faorite hu(an scientific

deice is the 7ato(3s(asher1:$ These conce#ts are si(#ly

reflected in the #hysical laws of (atter in the area around your

#lanet$ In other words, what you draw forth fro( the #otential

and obsere as #hysical laws regarding the interaction of (atter

and energy is a direct reflection of your consciousness, which is

#ri(arily one of o##osing, not coo#erating$ If you were to walk

down the street and tell eeryone you loed the(, what do you

think would ha##en to you? Dou1d #robably get socked2

These ideas of conflict and o##osition in the hu(an

consciousness are reflected in the #hysical laws of (atter that you

obsere$ ;hen your ideas change about these things, you will seea change in the way the #hysical laws of (atter and energy are

res#onding to you$

01, I get the idea# I &ust find it hard to believe that

we could actually alter the behavior of !atter and

energy and change the "hysical laws of nature by

si!"ly thining a certain way#

Des, we see that2 In your case there is a stubborn ibration within

you that says 7it cannot be right unless scientists agree with it$

Scientists are s(arter than I a( and s(arter than


42/207

42

;hat you fail to reali/e is that scientists are o#erating within the

sa(e uniersal laws as eeryone else, and that (ost scientists are

not aware of the($ *s we said before, the (indset of a scientist is

usually, 7it is not alid unless it is obsered,1 which fails to

reali/e that attention to so(ething i((ediately biases the

e)#eri(ent energetically$ Since this energy strea( cannot be

(easured or obsered, it is assu(ed that nothing is ha##ening$

4ut this is far fro( the truth$ ;e gae an analogy earlier about

the water co(ing through the garden hose$ If what is #ostulated

to be 7true1 is not obsered within a 7reasonable1 length of ti(e,

or is not obsered at all with the instru(ents #resently aailable

to science, it is said then not to e)ist or be de(onstrable,

therefore inalid$ 4ut the entire unierse is designed so that the7stuff1 of the unierse is res#onsie to consciousness2 Therefore,

continued focus on whateer is #ostulated will eentually bring it

into e)istence$ The 7truth1 is not what is obsered, but what is

thought, felt, and belieed by conscious beings, because

conscious beings affect the conditions around the($ That is the

whole #oint of being in #hysical for(2 If the unierse were

(erely running down according to so(e #rearranged #lan, and

the function of beings was si(#ly to obsere and record, therewould be no #oint to e)istence2 ;hy design a unierse and then

not be able to alter the conditions in it? ;hen you write a book

you need to be able to edit and i(#roe it before it is released$ It

would be (addening to hae your first draft on a read3only

docu(ent, would it not? In your non#hysical state you wanted to

co(e to earth and e)#erience the -oy of creation in the #hysical

unierse, to use your creatie ability to (anifest, and to hae fun2

01 I finally get it# I guess it really isn$t so hard to

understand that "hysical laws can be changed !erely

by a consciousness shift# It was &ust dru!!ed into !e

in science classes that the laws of !atter and energy

are funda!ental and unbreaable#


43/207

43

That is understandable2 4ut we want you to lighten u# and hae

(ore fun$ Indiidual hu(ans can (anifest what they want fro(

the #otential and together hu(ans as a whole can co(#letely

change the conditions in which they lie, if it is so desired$ The

unierse is set u# that way2 The unierse has been designed to

res#ond to your desires$ ;hen this is truly reali/ed you will then

begin to lie the way you intended to, before you incarnated into

a #hysical body$

9s(iles and a feeling of loe here:$

01, enough on the science thing# I never thought I

could gain clarity on that, but I believe I have now, at

least the ig =icture view#

*ny (ore questions?

2ot tonight# +hans'''

'arth the ar1it of the universeSession 9

It has been said that earth is the .ar!"it of the

universeF$ that all of the negativity fro! everywhere in

the universe has been de"osited here# (ny truth in

that?

f course not$ There is no 7negatie energy,1 only an absence of

light$ Eesistance to the source energy of the unierse results in a

feeling of negatiity, anger, de#ression, etc cetera, in other words,

negatie e(otion$ Dou cannot 7bag u#1 so(e 7negatie energy1

and cart it off, -ust like you cannot bag u# darkness and throw it


44/207


45/207

45

MeoriesSession 10

What are !e!ories?

Me(ories are the accu(ulated recordings of your resistance to

e)#erience$

Huh? *ou !ean the only recordings we have are of

things we have resisted?

Des$ ;hen you are totally en-oying an e)#erience there is no

recording of anything in your energy field$There is a saying you

hae 7what you resist, #ersists$1 It does not #ersist unless you

resist it2

Whoa there# So you are saying that there is no

re!e!brance of anything that is not negative? +hat$s

absurd'

;e are saying that there is a consciousness of the e)#eriences one

has had, on a ery (inute leel indeed$ 4ut there is no storage of

the e)#erience in your energy field unless there is resistance$ Ao

you see what we are getting at?

* conscious (e(ory of eerything that has eer ha##ened to you

is aailable to you at any ti(e$ 4ut the recording is only ofresistant thought or ibration$

So a !e!ory is a recording of resistance to an

ex"erience, but there is no !e!ory of a non-resistant


46/207

46

ex"erience? How does one recall non4 resistant

ex"eriences?

The non3resisted e)#erience is one of #ure -oy$ It i((ediatelyenters into uniersal knowledge as a ibrational i(#ression u#on

the consciousness$

Howeer, all disco(fort contains ibrations that are inco(#atible

with the ery high ibrations of consciousness$ Dou -ust drag this

stuff around with you, like the encu(bered ghost in the 6hrist(as

(oie with his chains and weights$ Dou (ay release any and all

of this stuff by si(#ly letting go of the resistance to it, in the now

(o(ent$ In other words, negatie e(otion is neer recorded2 It isa #hanto(, an illusion, een though you feel it ery strongly

so(eti(es2 ;hen you return to natie state you discard these

#atterns of resistance like a sweaty runner diing into a crystal

clear lake$

*es but you &ust said there is no negative energy# So

what ha""ens to all of this &un when you transition?

It &ust hangs around' So there IS negative energy'

;hen you transition, you (erge again with the energy of source$

;hen this ha##ens, all resistance to *@DTHI@O disa##ears$ So

to does any 7negatie energy$1 That is because there is no source

of negatiity, only a resistance to the light$

Ao you understand?

I$! beginning to# *ou are saying that the accu!ulated

recording of .negative vibration$ throughout the life is

auto!atically erased u"on transition out of the body?


47/207

47

;hat we are saying is that 7negatie energy1 is si(#ly a

continued resistance to so(ething$ ;hen that resistance is gone,

there is no (ore 7negatie energy$1

What about the tra""ed energy in ar!ic incidents?

(nd in trau!atic incidents? If you add all of that u",

that$s a lot of negative energy'

K, let us say it this way *ll e)#eriences that you #erceie

negatiely are ibrations that you hold actiated within you, right

now, in the #resent$ In other words, the negatie feelings are your

own energy of resistance to the e)#erience$ ;hen you transition,

you si(#ly release all of that resistance2 Therefore, all of the

7negatie energy1 anishes, because it was being created by you

and held there by you while you were incarnated in the body, in

eery (o(ent of your now$ ;e assure you that once you re3

(e(ber the feeling of source 9indescribable feelings of -oy:, you

throw that e)cess and unwanted baggage quickly away$ In other

words, you no longer feel the need to hold onto old grudges,

#ains, or -udg(ents about yourself and others$ The energy of

source is indescribably delicious2 ;hen e)#osed to it there is aco(#lete and utter feeling of -oy and well3being22

*fter transitioning there is a co(#lete i(#rint of the life

e)#erience, fro( beginning to end, but without any of the

7negatiity$1 Therefore, there is no continuation of negatie

energy$ There is no kar(a$ *ll of the e)#eriences of the life are

resoled instantly u#on transition back to source energy$ It is

i(#ossible for a being in @atie State to carry kar(a, bad ibes,

sickness, or anything negatie fro( life to life$ The two are

utterly inco(#atible$ ;hen the light shines, it auto(atically

eli(inates the darkness$


48/207

48

Wow' +hat really !aes sense' So an astral "lane

where tra""ed beings exist in negative circu!stances is

a !yth?

It is a result of hu(an disconnection, that is all$ ;hen you feel

connected to source, is there een a hint of negatiity or bad

feeling within you?

2o, I have to say you are right# When I feel connected

I &ust feel wonderful, "eriod#

Des2 @ow (ulti#ly that by a (illion and you know what it feels

like where we are22

Well then, that brings u" the sa!e old )uestionE why

would anyone in his right !ind co!e here nowing

that the "robability for disconnection is about

#G? +here !ust be so!e sort of .save the

universe$ scenario going on, otherwise it is "ointless to

co!e to earth and suffer# Why not &ust s"end all your

ti!e in bliss?

;ell, you are trying to se#arate the consciousness while in

#hysical and the broader, uniersal consciousness$ * fellow

hu(an by the na(e of @eale Aonald ;alsch said it wonderfully

in one of his books$ He said that all lies are being led now

because all incarnated #hysical beings are as#ects of the uniersal

consciousness of Ood$ .en though each has a focused identityand #ersonality, each knows and feels and IS the whole$ So there

is really no se#aration$

;hy do youGweGus co(e to earth? To e)#erience intensely2 That

is the long and the short of it$ Des, it feels wonderful in natie


49/207

49

state, but we assure you that there is nothing like the #hysical

e)#erience$ It is -ust different in an a(a/ing and wonderful way$

%art of the require(ents for incarnation is a li(iting of

#erce#tion$ ;e refer to this as focusing, as a (agnifying glass

concentrates the light into a #oint$ r #erha#s, an a(oeba as it

e)tends a #oly# toward a tiny organis($

;hile in #hysical you #erceie fro( a ery tiny, intensely

focused #oint of consciousness$ Dou gie u# a broader awareness

and knowledge of all3that3is, and in return you hae the

o##ortunity to e)#erience the -oy of re!discoery as you

re(e(ber your connection to source$ This is su##osed to be a-oyful unfolding, but (any of you hae (ade it trau(atic$ That is

all right, when you (ake your transition back to natie state you

co(e back to your natural #lace of co(#lete bliss and

understanding of self$

+hans'

ManifestationSession 11

8et$s loo at the glass sitting on !y des# Does the

glass have an inde"endent existence, so that anyone in

any di!ension could "erceive it as a glass, or is it &ust

so!ething we can see fro! our own "hysical hu!an

"ers"ective?

Is there a gradient of energy that gets denser and

denser until the ob&ect !anifests? y that I !ean, if


50/207


51/207

51

*ll irtual (eans is that you cannot #erceie it2 Dou say, 7the

#otential (ust be irtual, because I a( not aware of all of the

thought, all of the ibrational energy of eerything in the

unierse$1 r 7this thing I know has (ass, and therefore reality,

because I can #erceie it, feel it, touch it$1

;hat is 7real1 de#ends u#on the consciousness and the ibrational

sensors of the #erceier$ It is not #ossible to say that so(ething

e)ists for eeryone, or does not e)ist2 It is all a (atter of

inter#retation, and conscious intent$ Dou (ay draw anything out

of the #otential you would like and #erceie it in any way you

would like$ f course, being in hu(an for( there are li(itations

to what you are going to be able to #erceie$ Therefore, youinent ter(s like irtual and real to describe things that you

cannot #erceie and things you can #erceie$

The glass that sits before you looks like a glass when you turn

your eyes toward it, but to another consciousness whose sensors

are tuned to a different ibratory frequencies, the strea( of

energy that for(s the glass (ay be so(ething entirely different$

;e are telling you what is 7real1 to us fro( our antage #oint,

which is (ore e)tensie than yours$

*ou have said before that on earth we are on the

.leading edge$ of thought# What does that !ean?

4y this we (ean that your #erce#tion is narrowed to a #lace

where there are only a ery few #atterns 9bandwidth of

ibrations: of the all3that3is #erceiable to your senses$ Dou haethe ability to o#en u# to source energy, of course, and feel as

wonderful as any other conscious being at any leel5 een (ore

so, because of how intensely you e)#erience here$ .arth is on the

leading edge of thought because here there is less awareness of

all!that!is$ @ew aenues of thought are considered, because all of


52/207

52

you are so uniquely indiidual and consciously se#arated fro(

each other$

01, but there !ust be lots of other intelligent, "hysical

life for!s out there in the universe# +here is nothing

s"ecial about earth as o""osed to any other "lanet, is

there?

n .arth there are certain #hysical laws and behaior #atterns

that hae been brought forth out of the #otential as a result of the

s#ecies (ass consciousness$ >or the #ast seeral thousands of

years, after the destruction of the last (a-or great ciili/ation

u#on your #lanet, there has been a greater feeling of se#aration

and conflict a(ong the hu(an s#ecies which has led to the

deelo#(ent of a ciili/ation based u#on the conce#ts of scarcity

and lack$ The reasons for this are too co(#licated to go into right

now$

The earth eniron(ent has gradually eoled following the

intentions of all s#ecies that hae lied here 9the consciousness of

the dinosaur s#ecies, for e)a(#le has (oed on, as well as (anyothers:$ *s we said before, consciousness has the ability to

(odify (atter and energy and een the #hysical laws in a local

area of s#aceGti(e$ ther #lanets or sectors of the unierse hae

different cultures and abilities, de#ending u#on the indiidual and

grou# consciousness of the #hysical beings there$ et us say that

there is (ore diersity and contrast u#on your little world than

u#on any other we know$

Current "ffairs in the 3S 2002Session 12


53/207

53

What ha""ens if the current "olitical cli!ate in the

nited States taes a turn for the worse? y that I

!ean, what if those in "ower who are deter!ined to

i!"ose their will so!ehow !anage to set u" a "olice

state, or a dictatorshi"? It see!s to !e that we are

leaning in that direction#

2ow let$s say I, in !y "ositive la4la4land, envision

!yself in a world of freedo! surrounded by wealth and

abundance, "ros"erity and ha""inessF in short, a world

which is &ust the o""osite, and which see!s !ore and!ore to be the agree!ent of the !a&ority of "eo"le in

this country#

My )uestion is, how can !y world coexist with that

other world?

*s long as you allow these things into your ibration, then they

hae a chance of (anifesting for you$ It is -ust that si(#le$

01 I now that, you now I now that, but you also

now that the situation I have described above is very

"ossible# *ou don$t disagree with that, do you?

;e see that there are (any on your #lanet creating different

scenarios, in co(#lete accordance with free will$ There are so(e

who are (ore disconnected than others$ There is no battle of goodand eil, howeer, as you see( to suggest$

*es, but what can we do about those who are

advancing their negative agendas?


54/207

54

;ell, we ask you, what can you do to 7sto#1 this scenario fro(

co(ing about? 6an you go out with guns and resist the

7o##ressors?1 Dou know what ha##ens then what you resist

#ersists$ If you want to guarantee (ore energy to those who( you

call the 7global elite,1 or the 7authorities,1 kee# on thinking and

acting in this (anner2

Dou see, the only way you can guarantee what you want for

yourself is to kee# your ibration #urely on what it is you want$

;hen you finally understand that you will be free$ ;hat a##ears

in your life e)#erience is solely and only a function of your

thoughts and beliefs$ therwise, others could create in your

e)#erience and that si(#ly cannot ha##en$ thers creating inyour e)#erience is a iolation of uniersal law$ The unierse is

set u# so that each and eery one (ay receie what is wanted no

(atter what the others are doing$

01, but what if society falls a"art, lie it did during

the reat De"ression in the 93


55/207

55

interfacing with the co!!on reality, how a! I

su""osed to !anifest !y vision of !y reality when it

conflicts with the !ass reality?

Dou hae asked a good question, but we res#ond to you by

identifying those ibrations and feelings within you that are

focusing on the unwanted reality you hae described to us$ Those

feelings, thoughts and beliefs are what will tie you to the 7(ass

reality,1 as you call it2 That, and only that, would be the reason

you found yourself in a reality not to your liking$

Wow# *ou guys are sure stubborn' *ou continue to

insist on .you create your own reality$ even when it

flies in the face of reason#

;ell, the reason, as you call it, which describes the ineitability

of the dark society you are afraid of is what the unierse will

res#ond to in your ibration$ ;e assure you that there are (any

(ore like you in the world than you hae any idea of$ There are

(illions u#on (illions who do not beliee in darkness, and the

ones who do beliee are si(#ly disconnected$ Their

disconnection does not gie the( #ower5 your attention to the(

grants the( #ower2 The natural condition for any being is

connection to source energy$ Source energy is #ositie, abundant

and -oyful$ So those 7black1 #eo#le, as you call the(, are bucking

a ery strong current, the current of the energy of the unierse2

There is no source of eil2 That is what we hae been saying to

you for years$ ife is a win3win situation$ %eo#le receie whatthey are focused u#on$ Dour thoughts and beliefs #recisely

establish the content of your ibration, to which all things in the

unierse res#ond$ Those who choose to focus in a disconnected

way will lie lies of disconnection$ Those who are focused in a

#ositie way will lie lies in a #ositie condition, connected to


56/207

56

the flow of uniersal energy$ The #ara(eters of your e)istence

(ay change if others change5 but it will still be a #ositie

e)istence I> you kee# your focus on what you want2 It is si(#ly

u# to you what you choose5 the unierse has the ca#acity to

res#ond$ Dou (ay lie e)actly as you choose to lie$ That1s the

wonderful thing about this unierse 33 the desires of eeryone

(ay be satisfied$

;hen you truly understand this you will neer again worry about

what others are doing$ Dou are the (older, the initer, of your

own e)#erience$$

Wow# 01, I a! getting a "ositive, utterly confidentflow of energy fro! you again# So it doesn$t !atter

how !uch garbage is out there, we are truly free to

live exactly the way we choose, even if G of

hu!anind choose to live totally o""osite? *ou see,

that$s the "art I still don$t get# If

0$


57/207

57

.erywhere in the unierse there is (atching of desire$ >or those

who wish chaos and disconnection there is (atching desire, and

#ersons who want to #lay that way$ *nd for you, there is

(atching desire for connection$ ;e want to say to you that you

cannot lose, you are always and will always receie a #recise

ibrational (atch to your desires no (atter whether you are a

#hysically focused consciousness in a body, or whether you are

co(#letely in 7non3#hysical$1 ;hateer you choose as your #lace

of ibration 9thought, belief, and feeling: you will hae a

(atching e)#erience$ That is -ust the way it is2 If you choose

abundance and #ros#erity you can e)#erience it, in whateer for(

you enision$

Bven if the disconnected ones start WWIII and dro"

hydrogen bo!bs everywhere? I don$t care where you

are on the "lanet$s surface or how !uch abundance

and "ros"erity you are clai!ing, that radiation is

going to ill you#

Des, and so it (ight$ Then you will transition back to source

energy2

*es, and what you have said about ex"eriencing

"ros"erity and abundance in the "hysical for!at is so

!uch horse !anure'

Dou will only e)#erience ;;III if it is so(ewhere within your

ibration2 ;e assure you that you would neer e)#erience

;;III if you chose otherwise2 Ao you see? 4ecause you hae

focused on ;;III you are creating the #ossibility of it and the

#otential of it for yourself, and actiating the ibration of that

#ossibility for others to #ick u# on$ Dou beco(e a broadcasting

tower for your worst fears, and enable the(2 *nd so does eery

hu(an who focuses there$ *ll hu(ans are creating their own


58/207

58

e)#erience, both indiidually and collectiely$ If you do not wish

to e)#erience ;;III, you will not e)#erience it, as long as your

ibration is #ure$ If it is not, if you ad(it the #ossibility of it, then

there is a chance to e)#erience it$ That is true for eery one of

your fellow creators$ The sa(e #rinci#le a##lies to anything you

do not desire, whether it is ery large or ery s(all$

*s we hae said oer and oer, you are the (older of your own

e)#eriences2 Dou are in charge, you are the writer and director of

your own life$

ur (essage is J= e(#owering because that is the way the

unierse is set u#$ Dou are focused consciousness, an as#ect ore)tension of uniersal consciousness, which created and designed

the unierse$

;e want you to know that the set3u# for all life e)#erience is a

win3win$ There is no lose5 unless, of course, you want to

e)#erience that way$

Dou see, Ood is not so(ewhere u# there in the sky with a

blackboard (arking down whether you are doing good or bad$There is no 7su#erior force1 that has it all down, who knows

eerything and who can tell you -ust what is the best thing to

think, feel, or do$ ;e, as collectie consciousness, are writing our

scri#t as we go along$ The whole 7#lay1 is set u# so that you can

e)#erience anything you would like$ If you ha##en to get so

disconnected that you 7die1 9there is no death: then you si(#ly

unfocus fro( the body and transition back to your broader

awareness$

01 I get it# I ee" saying that, then I ee" asing the

sa!e negative )uestions, and you ee" res"onding with

the sa!e answers# I don$t now why I ee" going bac

into that negative stuff, &ust a habit of !ine, I guess'


59/207


60/207

60

feel as negatie as you #lease but we will neer go there with

you2

01, so you don$t go there because that is not the

nature of reality#

;ell, reality is whateer you create for yourself2 4ut we choose

not to create for ourseles a #lace of bad feeling$ ;e always

choose loe, beauty, e)cite(ent, -oy, anything that feels good,

because feeling good is the inherent, natural state for any natie

state entity$

I$! starting to get it# It is "ossible to create forourselves a life of &oy, or of "ain# It$s u" to us#

Des2 It is easy to create a life of -oy and a lot of hard work to

create a life of (isery$ That is because #ain and (isery is a

resistance to the natural flow of life force energy 9do you feel it?

yes2: and in order to create #ain and (isery continuously, you

(ust continually resist$ In other words, you create the ibration

9feeling: of #ain and (isery in eery (o(ent, in o##osition to thenatural flow of benign source energy$ ;e understand why you do

this2 There are so (any things in the world that you would not in

a (illion years wish to e)#erience5 and so, in an atte(#t to ensure

that none of it co(es into your e)#erience, you begin to fight

against it$

The 7;ar on %oerty,1 the 7;ar on Arugs,1 and the 7;ar on

Terroris(1 are -ust a few e)a(#les of the atte(#t to change

so(ething by resisting it5 but w

conversations with my higher self

Documents