cooling poultry
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/11/2019 Cooling Poultry
1/48
Cooling Poultry inCooling Poultry inTropical ClimatesTropical ClimatesHongwei Xin, Professor
Director of Egg Industry Center Iowa State University
*>40.0
*
-
8/11/2019 Cooling Poultry
2/48
OutlineOutlineBrief overview of U.S. poultry production systemsPoultry responses to thermal environment
Poultry cooling options in tropical climatesPad-fan cooling with tunnel ventilation
High-pressure fogging
Low-pressure sprinkling
-
8/11/2019 Cooling Poultry
3/48
-
8/11/2019 Cooling Poultry
4/48
Typically 20,000 - 30,000birds, 0.75 ~ 0.9 ft 2/bird(12~14 birds/m 2)
New bedding or build-up litter
Growth period: 6 8 wks Brooders + space heaters
Evaporative cooling pads,high-pressure fogging, or low-pressure sprinkling
Natural or tunnel ventilation
Broiler HousesBroiler Houses
-
8/11/2019 Cooling Poultry
5/48
10,000 - 15,000 birds New or build-up litter
Growth period: 12 wk (hen) 20 wk (tom)
Natural or mechanical vent
Turkey HousesTurkey Houses
-
8/11/2019 Cooling Poultry
6/48
HighHigh --rise Layer Houserise Layer House Typically 80,000 125,000 hens
In-house manure storage (~1 yr) Manure scraped or direct drop
-
8/11/2019 Cooling Poultry
7/48
ManureManure --Belt Layer HouseBelt Layer House
Typically 100,000 -125,000 hens per house Manure removed daily to semi-weekly;
improved indoor air quality On/off farm manure storage or composting
-
8/11/2019 Cooling Poultry
8/48
Cage-free Layer House
5,000 -10,000 hens perhouse
Littered flooring, nest
boxes, perches, dust-bathing area
-
8/11/2019 Cooling Poultry
9/48
Poultry Responses to
Thermal Environment
-
8/11/2019 Cooling Poultry
10/48
HeatHeat --Wave DevastationWave Devastation
A scene from 1995 Heat Wave in Iowa
-
8/11/2019 Cooling Poultry
11/48
Consequence of Ventilation FailureConsequence of Ventilation Failure
-
8/11/2019 Cooling Poultry
12/48
Pathways of Animal Heat DissipationPathways of Animal Heat Dissipation
Respiratoryheat loss
Conductive heat loss
Convective heat loss
Air movement
Radiativeheat loss
HLcond + HL conv + HL rad = Sensible Heat Loss (SHL)
-
8/11/2019 Cooling Poultry
13/48
Genetic Adaptation to Hot ClimateGenetic Adaptation to Hot Climate
-
8/11/2019 Cooling Poultry
14/48
Featherless & Naked Neck ChickensFeatherless & Naked Neck Chickens
More heat tolerant!
-
8/11/2019 Cooling Poultry
15/48
Environmental Factors AffectingEnvironmental Factors Affecting Animal Heat Dissipation Animal Heat Dissipation
Surrounding temperatures SHL Air (convective)
Ceiling/roof or wall (radiative)Floor (conductive)
Air Velocity SHLHumidity or vapor pressure LHL
-
8/11/2019 Cooling Poultry
16/48
Combined Effects of Temperature andCombined Effects of Temperature and
Humidity on Livestock & PoultryHumidity on Livestock & PoultryTemperature-Humidity Index (THI)
THI = a Tdb + b Twb (b = 1-a)
Animal Species a b
Cattle 0.35 0.65
G-F pigs 0.65 0.35
Laying hens 0.60 0.40
Hen turkeys 0.74 0.26
Tom turkeys 0.64 0.36
-
8/11/2019 Cooling Poultry
17/48
Body Temperature Rise of 2.8 kg Broilers
at Different Temp & Humidity Conditions
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240Exposure Time (min)
B o
d y
T e m p e r a
t u r e
R i s e
( o C )
41 26.1
41 19.4 38 26.1
38 19.4
35 26.1
35 19.4
-
8/11/2019 Cooling Poultry
18/48
Combined Effects of Air Temperature,Combined Effects of Air Temperature,Humidity and VelocityHumidity and Velocity
Temperature-Humidity Velocity Index (THVI)
THVI = (a Tdb + b Twb)Vc
THVI =0.85T db + 0.15T wb
V0.058
For broilers (2.8 kg):
-
8/11/2019 Cooling Poultry
19/48
Homeostasis Zones of 2.8-kg Broilers
Subjected to Acute Heat Exposure
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
210
240
32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44
THVI ( oC)
T h e r m a
l E x p o s u r e
T i m e
( m i n )
N o r m a l
A l e r t
D a n g e r
E m e r g e n c y
CBT thresholds: 1.0 (normal), 2.5 (alert), 4.0 (danger), & > 4.0 oC (emergency)
[(0.85t db + 0.15t wb)/V0.058 ]
-
8/11/2019 Cooling Poultry
20/48
Ventilation Rates for PoultryVentilation Rates for PoultryCold Mild Hot
m 3hr -1unit -1
Broilers
Turkeys
0 - 7 d head 0.07 0.34 0.68> 7 d kg 0.4 1.9 3.7
Layers kg 0.4 1.9 3.7 5.6
Poults head 0.34 1.2 1.7 6.8Growers kg 0.3 1.3 3.0
Species Unit
-
8/11/2019 Cooling Poultry
21/48
Air Flow Pattern In Poultry Houses Air Flow Pattern In Poultry Houses
Air stream
Cross Ventilation
Air stream
Tunnel Ventilation
-
8/11/2019 Cooling Poultry
22/48
Tunnel Ventilated Broiler HouseTunnel Ventilated Broiler House
To increase cooling effect by helping birds dissipate body heat faster
Air stream
-
8/11/2019 Cooling Poultry
23/48
Effect of Air Velocity as Affected byEffect of Air Velocity as Affected byVentilation ModeVentilation Mode CrossCross vs.vs. TunnelTunnel
A broiler barn with a dimension of 12 x 121 m (40 x 400 ft)
and a drop-ceiling height of 3 m (10 ft). Determine theaverage air velocity through the house if cross or tunnelventilation is used to ventilate the barn at 170,000 m 3/hr
(100,000 CFM) air flow.Q
V = A
For cross ventilation: A = 121 x 3 = 363 m 2
V = 170,000/363 = 468 m/hr = 0.13 m/s
For tunnel ventilation: A = 12 x 3 = 36 m 2V = 170,000/36 = 4722 m/hr = 1.31 m/s
Q = 170,000 m 3/hr
-
8/11/2019 Cooling Poultry
24/48
Effective Temperature vs. Air
Velocity for Broiler Chickens
606570
75
80859095
100
0 100 200 300 400 500 A ir Velo c i ty , f t /m in
E f f e c t
i v e
T e m p e r a
t u r e ,
F
A ir t em p = 90F
(1.5, 25)
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5m/s
E f f e c t
i v e
T e m p e r a
t u r e ,
C 40
36
32
28
24
20
16
Air temp = 32 C
-
8/11/2019 Cooling Poultry
25/48
Poultry Cooling Options
-
8/11/2019 Cooling Poultry
26/48
-
8/11/2019 Cooling Poultry
27/48
Evaporative Cooling Process
Wet-bulb l ine
85% RH
15 C
18 C 30 C
Saturation Line
0.01070 kg/kg da
0.00525 kg/kg da
Dry-bulb Air Temperature
Humidity Ratio
20% RH
1
2Hi T
Lo RHLo T
Hi RH
EC Pad
-
8/11/2019 Cooling Poultry
28/48
Broiler Barn with Tunnel VentilationBroiler Barn with Tunnel Ventilationand Evaporative Cooling Padsand Evaporative Cooling Pads
-
8/11/2019 Cooling Poultry
29/48
Pad-Fan Evaporative Cooling
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
7/11 7/18 7/25 8/1 8/8 8/15Date, m/d
A i r T e m p e r a
t u r e , o
C
0
5
10
15
20
T e m p e r a
t u r e
R e d u c t
i o n , o C
Before_Temp After_Temp Diff
-
8/11/2019 Cooling Poultry
30/48
II.II. Cooling by HighCooling by High --PressurePressure
Fogging Inlet or Inside Air Fogging Inlet or Inside Air
-
8/11/2019 Cooling Poultry
31/48
-
8/11/2019 Cooling Poultry
32/48
-
8/11/2019 Cooling Poultry
33/48
Temp. Reduction by Inlet FoggingTemp. Reduction by Inlet Fogging
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
07/03 07/10 07/17 07/24 07/31 08/07 08/14 08/21 08/28 09/04Date of 1999 (month/day)
T o_ m a x - T i_ m a x
( o C )
-
8/11/2019 Cooling Poultry
34/48
0%
10%20%30%40%50%60%70%
80%90%
100%
421-Jul
4415-Jul
4629-Jul
4812-Aug
5026-Aug
529-
Sep
5423-Sep
567-
Oct
5821-Oct
604-
Nov
6218-
Nov
Hen Age (week) and Date of 1999
H e n - d a y
E g g
P r o
d u c t
i o n
Standard at TN
Measured (fit)
Weekly Avg. HenWeekly Avg. Hen --Day Egg ProductionDay Egg Production
HDEP during 7/1 - 9/2:
Measured = 84.0 2.1%Standard = 85.8 1.3%
-
8/11/2019 Cooling Poultry
35/48
III.III. Cooling Broilers byCooling Broilers by
Surface WettingSurface Wetting
-
8/11/2019 Cooling Poultry
36/48
-
8/11/2019 Cooling Poultry
37/48
Determination of Cooling Need
Factorial combination of t db = 35, 38, & 41 oC; t dp =19 & 26 oC; V = 0.2, 0.7, & 1.2 m/s
*>40.0
*40.0
*40.0
*40.0
*40.0
*40.0
*
-
8/11/2019 Cooling Poultry
38/48
Body & Surface Temp Profiles of Cooledvs. Non-cooled Broilers
Thermal Condition:
38oC t db , 34% RH, and 0.7 m/s V
28
30
32
34
36
38
40
42
44
46
48
0 30 60 90 120 150
Exposure Time(min)
B i r d
B o
d y a n
d S u r
f a c e
T e m p
( o C )
tb-Trt tb-Ctrl ts-Trt ts-Ctrl
Thermal Condition: 38oC t db ,
34% RH, and 0.2 m/s V
28
30
32
34
36
38
40
42
44
46
48
0 30 60 90 120 150 180
Exposure Time (min)
B i r d
B o d y a n
d S u r
f a c e
T e m p . (
o C )
tb-Trt tb-Ctrl ts-Trt ts-Ctrl
-
8/11/2019 Cooling Poultry
39/48
-
8/11/2019 Cooling Poultry
40/48
IV. Cooling Laying Hens byIV. Cooling Laying Hens byPartial Surface WettingPartial Surface Wetting(PSW)(PSW)
-
8/11/2019 Cooling Poultry
41/48
Commercial High-Rise Layer House
*>43.0
*
-
8/11/2019 Cooling Poultry
42/48
Effects of PSW on Hens (Lab Test)Effects of PSW on Hens (Lab Test)
Response Control Sprinkling
Mortality (%) 100 40
Survival time (min) 141 210 (>480)
Avg T b rise (oC) 2.9 2.8 (1.8)
Max T b
rise ( oC) 5.7 5.3 (3.7)
Lethal BHL ( oC-hr) 6.6 10.0
Numbers in parentheses are for survived birds.
-
8/11/2019 Cooling Poultry
43/48
T/RH logger
Field Verification of PSWField Verification of PSW
Sprinkling: when T a>32 oC; 15 s per 15 min
-
8/11/2019 Cooling Poultry
44/48
Tier LocationRegimen Top 2 nd 3 rd Bottom Overall
Sprinkle 697 a
746 c
748 c
707 a
724x
Control 660 b 726 d 739 c ,d 695 a 705 y
a, b, c, d: P
-
8/11/2019 Cooling Poultry
45/48
Control Sprinkling
Top tier
2nd tier
3 rd tier
Bottom tier
EggshellIntegrity
No sign of bluedye penetration
through shell
-
8/11/2019 Cooling Poultry
46/48
ClosureClosureSufficient ventilation capacity is essential tominimizing animal heat stress.
Properly utilizing available ventilation capacity isequally important to maximizing the benefits offorced ventilation.
For a given ventilation rate, tunnel ventilationyields higher air velocity and thus provides more
cooling to the animals than crosswise ventilation.
-
8/11/2019 Cooling Poultry
47/48
ClosureClosurePad-and-fan, high-pressure fogging, or surfacewetting may be used to alleviate animal heat stress.
Pad-and-fan and fogging systems are effective underwarm and dry climates cool using more water.
Surface wetting is effective under warm/dry orwarm/humid conditions using less water; but maybe limited by physical configuration of the barns.
-
8/11/2019 Cooling Poultry
48/48
Egg Industry enter
http://www ans iastate edu/EIC
.. to serve the eggindustry through
sustained cooperativeresearch, extensionand education.