McMinnville

Cooperative

Ministries

Building Performance Report

&

Energy Retrofit Opportunities

McMinnville Cooperative Ministries

The Challenge Increasing Energy

Bills

Pollution

Climate Change

Decreasing Property Values

Deteriorating Infrastructure

Old, Inefficient Buildings

Electricity Use by Sector

Energy Use and Sources

Energy Use By Sector Fuel Sources

The Opportunity

By 2030, 75% of our infrastructure will be new or renovated

Efficiency –Cheapest Form of Energy

Building Performance

Building Performance

Comfort

Energy Efficiency

Indoor Air Quality

Energy Bills

Durability

Safety

Value

Stewardship

Building Performance 101

Envelope

Air Sealing

Duct Sealing

Duct Insulation

Insulation Attic

Crawl

Walls

Windows

Building Performance 101

Mechanical

Heating and

Cooling

Water Heating

Appliances

Lighting

Solar

Current Energy Profile

59%

41%

Energy Use (BTU)

Electricity Natural Gas

Data converted to BTU

Current Energy Profile

75%

25%

Carbon Footprint (Tons)

Electricity Natural Gas

Data based on regional energy portfolio and the Energy Information Administration

McMinnville Cooperative Ministries

Energy Retrofit Project

Annual Energy Cost (Old Building): $4,336

Potential Energy Savings: 72%

Potential Carbon Footprint Reduction: 80%

Air Quality Improvement: High

Comfort Factor: High

Air Sealing

Air Sealing - Existing

Over 14,543 CFM50

12 square foot hole

Holes in envelope

Leaky window and

door seals

Leaky penetrations

Leaky hatch seals

Air Sealing – Proposed

Target 2,500 CFM

Reduction

Accessible

Penetrations

Attic

Crawl

Bell Tower Knee Wall

Refurbish and

Weather-strip Doors

Air Sealing

Estimated Energy Savings: 5%

Estimated Carbon Reduction: 1.7 Tons

Air Quality Improvement: High

Comfort Factor: Moderate

Duct Sealing and

Insulation

Duct Sealing and Insulation -

Existing

Disconnected Duct

Runs

Un-Sealed

Un-Insulated

Duct Sealing and Insulation –

Proposed

Reconnect ducts

Seal ductwork

Insulate to R-11

with un-faced

fiberglass batts

Duct Sealing and Insulation

Estimated Energy Savings: 7%

Estimated Carbon Reduction: 2.49 Tons

Air Quality Improvement: High

Comfort Factor: High

Insulation

Insulation - Existing

Attic – 3 inch average blown in rock wool/fiberglass batt (R-8)

Crawl – Un-insulated

Walls – Mostly un-insulated

Fiberglass Blown In

Fiberglass High Density Batt

Fiberglass Batt

Insulation – Proposed Attic – Bring to R-49

with high density un-faced batts and blown in fiberglass

Crawl – Insulate to R-30 with high density un-faced batts

Walls – Drill and fill fiberglass insulation to R-13 to R-60, includes sheetrock repair, paint and lead paint abatement

Insulation

Estimated Energy Savings: 15%

Estimated Carbon Reduction: 5.34 Tons

Air Quality Improvement: Low

Comfort Factor: High

Window and Doors

Windows - Existing

Single Pane, Wood

Windows

Very Leaky

Stained Glass

Windows – Proposed

Replace Co-op Windows with High Efficiency Anderson 100 Windows

Windows – Proposed

Install Indow

Windows in Stained

Glass Panes

Doors - Existing

Leaky, damaged

doors

Doors – Proposed

Weatherize, refurbish and Re-fit Doors

Replace glass double door and wood basement door

Windows and Doors

Estimated Energy Savings: 8%

Estimated Carbon Reduction: 2.84 Tons

Air Quality Improvement: Moderate

Comfort Factor: High

Heating and Cooling

Heating and Cooling - Existing

The Co-op features

a natural gas

forced air heating

system paired with

base board

heating in the

offices and nursery

Heating and Cooling –

Proposed

Install Ductless

Heat Pumps in

Offices and Nursery

Retrofit a ducted

zonal heating

system with wireless

controls

Heating and Cooling

Estimated Energy Savings: 10%

Estimated Carbon Reduction: 3.56 Tons

Air Quality Improvement: Moderate

Comfort Factor: High

Solar

Solar – Proposed

Install a 9.2 kW solar

array, producing

29,360 kWh per

year

Solar

Estimated Energy Production: 27%

Estimated Carbon Reduction: 12.4 Tons

Air Quality Improvement: Low

Comfort Factor: Low

Energy Retrofit Plan

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Carbon Footprint Reduction

(Tons of Carbon)

Carbon Footprint Reduction

(Tons of Carbon)

Proposed Reductions

72%

28%

28%

Projected Energy Portfolio After Retrofit

Projected Reduction

Projected Use

Proposed Reductions

80%

20%

20%

Projected Carbon Footprint After Retrofit

Projected Reduction

Projected Use

McMinnville Cooperative Ministries

Energy Retrofit Project

Potential Energy Savings: 80%

Potential Carbon Footprint Reduction: 28.33 Tons

Air Quality Improvement: High

Comfort Factor: High

Thank You!