copia de cocomo ii estimation

7/28/2019 Copia de Cocomo II Estimation

1/17


2/17

Features Comments Reference Low Avg High Low Avg High Low Avg High Low Avg HigFeature 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0Feature 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0Feature 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0Feature 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0

Total Art i facts 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0

Total FP 24

EOILF EIF EI


3/17

Avg High Total FPs0 0 3

0 0 110 0 4

0 0 60 0

EQ


4/17

Features Comments Reference Language Estimated SLOCFeature 5 SQL 300Feature 6 Java 500

Feature 7 Java 100900Total :


5/17

Total FPs

8.57149.4340

1.886819.8922


6/17

Cocomo II

PM = A*Size^E*Produ ct(Al l Effort Mult ipl iers - EM)

Expo nent E = B+(0.01*SUM(Scaling Factors))

Scal ing FactorsSF Description Level ValueMaturity Process Maturity Nominal 4.68

PREC

Experience of similarProjects Very High 1.24

FLEX

Flexibility required in theSystem Very Low 0

TEAM Team Conhesiveness Extremely High 0

RESL

Project Risk andArchitectural Complexity Nominal 2.83

Effort Mult ip l ier EM

EM Description Level Value

RCPX

System reliability,complexity and sizeindicator Very Low 0.6

RUSE

Reusablity cocern withrespect to current andfuture projects Nominal 1

PDIF Platform Difficulty Extra Low 0.87

PERS

Personal capability ofteam. Like technicalcapability of Programmers,

Designers and testers. High 0.83

PREX

Application, Language and

tool experience High 0.87

FCIL

Using Case tools fordevelopment etc Nominal 1

SCED Schedule Pressure Nominal 1

Constants Value

B 0.91

A 2.94

E 0.9975

EM 0.3769362

Consol idated Size and Effor tTechnology JavaIncrease due to

lifecycle 0%SLOC per FP 53SLOC 2326.285714

PM 2.5725

Man-days 48.8782


7/17

FP from LOC 43.8922

Hours per FP 8.9088

SF Scale PREC FLEX TEAM RESL MaturityVery Low 6.20 0.00 5.48 0.00 7.80Low 4.96 1.01 4.38 1.41 6.24

Nominal 3.72 2.03 3.29 2.83 4.68High 2.48 3.04 2.19 4.24 3.12Very High 1.24 4.05 1.10 5.65 1.56Extremely High 0.00 5.07 0.00 7.07 0.00

EM Scale RCPX RUSE PDIF PERS PREX FCILExtra Low 0.49 0.95 0.87 2.12 1.59 1.43Very Low 0.60 0.95 0.87 1.62 1.33 1.30

Low 0.83 0.95 0.87 1.26 1.22 1.10Nominal 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00High 1.33 1.07 1.29 0.83 0.87 0.87Very High 1.91 1.15 1.81 0.63 0.74 0.73

Extremely High 2.72 1.24 2.61 0.50 0.62 0.62


8/17


9/17

SCED1.001.00

1.001.001.141.43

1.43


10/17

Summary Uni tsCategory Percentage of DevelopmentRequirements/Design 25%Development 45%

Test Planning 8%Testing 10%

Documentation 5%Deployment 1%Off-shore Management 5%On-site Management 1%

100%


11/17

Category Effort Comments/Assumptions

Requirements/Design Effort 12.22

Outputs are Technical Design andInformation Architecture doc. InformationArchitecture doc will have guidelines forinterface design.

Development Effort 22.00 Source Code

Test Planning 3.91 Output are Test Plan and Test CasesTesting Effort 4.89 Output is Test Results

Documentation Effort 2.44

Outputs are Deployment and BuildDocuments

Deployment Effort 0.49 Effort to deploy application

Off-shore Management 2.44

Output is Detailed Project Plans, Risk and

Issues tracking, Weekly status reports etc.

On-site Management Effort 0.49

Client Communication. Output is usually anylist of issues or improvement opportunities

Total Effort 48.88


12/17

Rate TiersUnits Low Medium HighArchitect/Designer 20 30 50Developer (Blended rate for Seniorand Junior Developer) 15 20 30Testing Lead 20 30 50

Tester 15 20 30Technical Writing Cost 15 20 30Manager 25 40 70On-site Manager 60 100 150

Primary Rate Factors Weightage Weighted ValueCustomer Buying Orientation Gold-Standard 7 0.7Hours Availability for

Technology Sufficient 5 0.25

Secondary Rate FactorsCustomer Type One Time Customer 1 0.1

Build Domain Competency Doesn't Matter 1 0.05Build Technology Competency Doesn't Matter 2 0.1Scope Creep Risk High 2 0.2Payment Pattern Delayed Payments 2 0.2

20 1.6

Selected Rate High

Buying Orientations Value

Price-Oriented 0

Solution-Oriented 1

Gold-Standard 2

Hours Availability Value

Surplus 0

Sufficient 1

Less 2

Customer Type Value Description

Good Existing Customer 0

Existing Customer 1One Time Customer 2Strategic Value Customer 0

Build Technology Competency Value DescriptionYes 0

Doesn't Matter 1Avoid Technology 2

Hours Inventory has some hours free but tecutilized more than break-even

Hours Inventory has very low hours free in th

Price is the main factor in making decision fo

Description

Price, quality and other factors combined ma

winning projectCustomer is highly focused on quality and prwould give it prime importance in making de

DescriptionHours Inventory has many hours free in this


13/17

Build Domain Competency Value DescriptionYes 0

Doesn't Matter 1Avoid Domain 2

Payment Pattern Value DescriptionUpfront Timely Payments 0Timely Payments 1Delayed Payments 2

Scope Creep Risk Value DescriptionHigh 2Moderate 1

Low 0


14/17

Selected50

3050

303070

150

hnology area is

is technology area

r this project

ke the criteria for

oject features andisions

echnology area


15/17

Cost Uni tsUnits per hour per daysArchitect/Designer 50 400Developer (Blended rate forSenior and JuniorDeveloper) 30 240

Testing Lead 50 400Tester 30 240Technical Writing Cost 30 240Manager 70 560On-site Manager 150 1200

Total Project Cost

Category

Effort (Days)

Estimated

Effort (Days)

to Quote Cost

Requirements/Design Effort 12.2 11.0 $4,400Development Effort 22.0 21.0 $5,040

Test Planning 3.9 4.0 $1,600Testing Effort 4.9 5.0 $1,200Documentation Effort 2.4 3.0 $720Deployment Effort 0.5 1.0 $400Off-shore Management 2.4 3.0 $1,680On-site Management Effort 0.5 1.0 $1,200

Total 48.9 49.0 $16,240$41.43

Total Supp ort CostMan Months 1Man Days 5

Category Hours per day Total Hours CostDesigners 0.5 2.5 $125Developers 8 40 $1,200Testers 1 5 $150Managers 0.5 2.5 $175

$1,650Total

Blended Rate


16/17

Assumpt ions

ResourcesDesigners 1Developers 2Testers 1

OthersPossible Critical Chain Delay inDevelopment 5%Possible Fixation Delay inTesting 5%Working days in a month 21Ratio of calendar days 1.476190476

Project Plan - Waterfal lPhase Duration (days) Duration (months)

Requirements/Design Phase 11.0 0 Month 16 DayDevelopment Phase 11.0 0 Month 16 DayTesting Phase 5.3 0 Month 8 Day

Total 27.3 1 Month 9 DaySlack 3.0

Grand Total 30.3 1 Month 14 Day

Iterative Plan

Iterations 1

Iteration Duration

(without Slacks)

1 100% 27.282 0% 0.003 0% 0.004 0% 0.005 0% 0.00Total 100%

Test Planning, Documentation and Management activities are carried outin parallel to other main activities of design, development and testing


17/17

SlacksInitial Ramp-up 0.5Deployment for testing etc 0.5Code/Peer Reviews 1

Shipment Packaging & Review 1

Total Slack 3

Requirements/Design Development Testing

11.0 11.0 5.30.0 0.0 0.0

0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0