copper-catalyzed asymmetric conjugate addition of ... · pdf file2418 copper-catalyzed...
TRANSCRIPT
2418
Copper-catalyzed asymmetric conjugate addition oforganometallic reagents to extended Michael acceptorsThibault E. Schmid1, Sammy Drissi-Amraoui2, Christophe Crévisy1, Olivier Baslé1
and Marc Mauduit*1
Review Open Access
Address:1Ecole Nationale Supérieure de Chimie de Rennes, UMR CNRS6226, 11 Allée de Beaulieu, 35708, Rennes cedex 7, France and2Institut Charles Gerhardt Montpellier, UMR 5253 CNRS-UM-ENSCM,Ecole Nationale Supérieure de Chimie, 8 Rue de l’Ecole Normale,34296 Montpellier Cedex 5, France
Email:Marc Mauduit* - [email protected]
* Corresponding author
Keywords:conjugate additions; electron-deficient alkenes; enantioselectivecatalysis; extended Michael acceptors; organometallic nucleophiles;sequential addition
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2015, 11, 2418–2434.doi:10.3762/bjoc.11.263
Received: 10 September 2015Accepted: 11 November 2015Published: 03 December 2015
This article is part of the Thematic Series "Copper catalysis in organicsynthesis" and is dedicated to Professor Stephen Hanessian on theoccasion of his 80th birthday.
Guest Editor: S. R. Chemler
© 2015 Schmid et al; licensee Beilstein-Institut.License and terms: see end of document.
AbstractThe copper-catalyzed asymmetric conjugate addition (ACA) of nucleophiles onto polyenic Michael acceptors represents an attrac-
tive and powerful methodology for the synthesis of relevant chiral molecules, as it enables in a straightforward manner the sequen-
tial generation of two or more stereogenic centers. In the last decade, various chiral copper-based catalysts were evaluated in
combination with different nucleophiles and Michael acceptors, and have unambiguously demonstrated their usefulness in the
control of the regio- and enantioselectivity of the addition. The aim of this review is to report recent breakthroughs achieved in this
challenging field.
2418
IntroductionAmongst the variety of synthetic methods available for the for-
mation of C–C or C–heteroatom bonds, the asymmetric conju-
gate addition (ACA) of nucleophiles to electron-deficient
alkenes is one of the most relevant and versatile for the syn-
thesis of complex chiral molecules [1]. Notably, the design and
study of novel families of chiral enantiopure ligands has
enabled a fine control of the regio- and enantioselectivity of the
reaction, using a variety of nucleophilic and electrophilic sub-
strate associations, with remarkable applications in total
syntheses [2].
Polyenic electron-deficient alkenes are Michael acceptors of
high synthetic interest. Indeed, they can undergo successive
nucleophilic additions and therefore enable the generation of
several new chiral centers [3]. On the other hand, the main chal-
lenge associated with polyenic Michael acceptors lies within the
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2015, 11, 2418–2434.
2419
Figure 1: Possible reaction pathways in conjugate additions of nucleophiles on extended Michael acceptors.
regiocontrol of the nucleophilic attack, which can occur at three
different positions, at least. The regioselectivity outcome of the
ACA reaction depends on many parameters, notably the metal/
chiral ligand combination, the structure of the electrophile and
the nature of the nucleophile. Figure 1 depicts the various
scenarios that can be expected with an α,β,γ,δ-unsaturated
Michael acceptor.
Amongst the variety of transition-metal-based catalytic systems
that have been evaluated in ACA reactions on extended Michael
acceptors [1,3], copper-based systems have been the subject of
tremendous interest, which provided dramatic breakthroughs
during the last two decades. This review aims to describe the
early examples and recent advances in copper-catalyzed asym-
metric conjugate additions of organometallic reagents to
extended Michael acceptors. First, seminal reports dealing with
the reactivity of extended Michael acceptors with regards to
copper-based nucleophiles in stoichiometric reactions will be
presented. Based on these results, research groups gained better
understanding of the origin of the regioselectivity in such
processes, and started to develop modern enantioselective
catalytic systems. These works will be classified according to
the selectivity of the addition (1,6, 1,4 then 1,8 and 1,10), while
taking into account the nature of the nucleophile (dialkylzinc,
Grignard or trialkylaluminium reagents).
ReviewBackground – first studiesThe first example of achiral addition of a copper-based com-
pound to an extended Michael acceptor was reported indepen-
dently as early as 1972, by the Näf [4] and Corey [5] groups,
who studied the reactivity of pentadienyl methyl ester (1,
Figure 2). In both cases, the 1,6-conjugate addition of a stoi-
chiometric amount of a Gilman reagent proceeded in a selec-
tive manner, affording compounds 2 and 3. In the early 1980s,
Yamamoto and co-workers also studied the reactivity of
extended Michael acceptors with regard to the nature of the
cuprate reagent; methyl sorbate (4) was chosen as a model sub-
strate [6]. This work evidenced that a control of the regioselec-
tivity of the reaction could be achieved with a careful choice of
the copper-based nucleophile. Indeed, Yamamoto’s cuprate
(n-BuCu·BF3) led to the 1,4-addition product 5a, while the 1,6-
adduct 5b was selectively obtained upon reaction with a Gilman
reagent. Inspired by these seminal studies, the addition of
cuprates was investigated onto different Michael acceptors [7].
The reaction of dienones such as 6 (Miginiac) [8], enynones of
the type 8 (Hulce) [9] or polarized enynes 10 (Krause) [10]
consistently proceeded with a 1,6-selectivity, as compounds 7, 9
and 11 were respectively identified as the major reaction prod-
uct. The selective 1,6-addition of cuprates onto extended
Michael acceptors featuring a terminal C–C triple bond
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2015, 11, 2418–2434.
2420
Figure 2: Early reports of conjugate addition of copper-based reagents to extended Michael acceptors.
prompted research groups to investigate thoroughly the mecha-
nism of this reaction [11-13].
Notably, the 1,6-conjugate additions onto Michael acceptors
involving copper reagents were employed in total synthesis
strategies (Figure 3). Wieland and Anner took advantage of the
reaction selectivity in the synthesis of steroids as early as 1967
[14]. For instance, the product (rac)-13 was obtained in 43%
yield by reacting a methylmagnesium bromide with the steroid
derivative 12 in the presence of a substoichiometric amount of
copper chloride. Ten years later, Alexakis and Posner described
the addition of a vinyl Grignard reagent to the conjugated
dienone 14, affording product 15 in 66% yield, ultimately
leading to pseudoguaiane [15].
The initial results regarding stoichiometric reactions of copper-
based nucleophiles onto extended Michael acceptors gave the
scientific community a glimpse of the great potential of such
methodologies. It appeared that the regioselectivity of the reac-
tion could be tuned by varying the nature of the copper reagent
[6]. Additionally, the applications in total synthesis demon-
strated that the nucleophilic copper compound could be gener-
ated in situ [14,15]. The design of efficient catalytic protocols
could therefore be envisioned, enabling fine-tuning of the regio-
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2015, 11, 2418–2434.
2421
Figure 3: First applications of copper catalyzed 1,6-ACA in total synthesis.
Scheme 1: First example of enantioselective copper-catalyzed ACA on an extended Michael acceptor.
and the enantioselectivity of the reaction. In order to tackle this
challenge, many research groups extensively investigated the
effect of various copper precursors, nucleophiles and Michael
acceptors in catalysis, in combination with new families of
chiral ligands. The results will be presented according to the
selectivity of the conjugate addition; the first section will be
dealing with enantioselective 1,6-additions, followed by the
description of systems affording preferentially the 1,4-adduct,
and a final paragraph will focus on the reactions conditions
leading to 1,8- or 1,10-addition products.
Enantioselective 1,6-addition to extendedMichael acceptorsWith dialkylzinc reagentsAlexakis and co-workers discovered in 2001 the first example
of copper-catalyzed enantioselective 1,6-conjugate addition
[16]. Using phosphoramidite ligand (S,R,R)-L1 and Cu(OTf)2
as the copper source, diethylzinc was added to dienone 16 with
a full 1,6-regioselectivity, and an ee of 35% (Scheme 1).
In 2006, Fillion and co-workers studied the reactivity of
Meldrum’s acid derivatives of the type 18 with regards to ACA
reactions, using dialkylzinc as nucleophiles [17]. Employing the
same catalytic system as Alexakis, namely Cu(OTf)2/(S,R,R)-
L1, the reaction was also fully 1,6-selective, and its versatility
was studied on a substrate scope. As shown in Scheme 2,
tertiary and quaternary stereogenic centers could be generated
using this methodology leading to products 19 in moderate to
good yields and ees.
In 2008, Alexakis and Mauduit evaluated a series of different
chiral ligands in ACA reactions involving polyenic Michael
acceptors and various nucleophiles [18]. In this study, the addi-
tion of diethylzinc was notably investigated on cyclic dienone
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2015, 11, 2418–2434.
2422
Scheme 2: Meldrum’s acid derivatives as substrates in enantioselective ACA.
Scheme 3: Reactivity of a cyclic dienone in Cu-catalyzed ACA of diethylzinc.
20 (Scheme 3). As regards the 1,6-conjugate addition, the
highest enantioselectivity was achieved with the bulky phos-
phoramidite (S,R,R)-L2, to afford 21 in 66% yield and 89% ee.
Shortly after, Alexakis and Mauduit demonstrated the effi-
ciency of the carboxylate-phosphino Schiff-base ligand
DiPPAM (L3) in copper-catalyzed 1,6-ACA with cyclic
dienones [19]. Interestingly, the reaction remained fully 1,6-
regioselective, while the enantioselectivity was significantly im-
proved. Indeed, a wide variety of substrates of the type 22 were
reacted with several dialkylzinc reagents, affording the 1,6-
adducts 23 with ees ranging from 93 to 99% (Scheme 4). More-
over, the reactivity of bicyclic dienone 24 was studied in these
conditions, but a substantially lower enantioselectivity was
recorded (25 formed in a 40% ee). An additional study dealing
with the Cu/DiPPAM-based system in the 1,6-addition demon-
strated remarkable nonlinear effects (NLE) [20], which could
also be observed in 1,4-ACA on both cyclic and acyclic enones.
The efficiency of this copper-based catalytic system featuring
DiPPAM was further tested in the reaction of linear aryl-
dienones 26, which are known to be significantly less reactive
than their cyclic counterparts [21]. The recorded performances
were also excellent, as regioselectivities up to 98/2 and enantio-
selectivities ranging from 88 to 98% ee were reported. In order
to fully demonstrate the synthetic significance of such a
methodology, compounds 27 were reconjugated in the presence
of DBU and subsequently reacted in the 1,4-ACA (Scheme 5).
The optimized conditions for the conversion of 28 to 29
involved copper(I) thiophene-2-carboxylate (CuTC) and
(R)-Binap L4, which afforded the desired final products bearing
two stereogenic centers with excellent diastereoselectivies
(93–97%).
N-Heterocyclic carbenes (NHCs) have emerged, in these last
two decades, as a powerful and versatile class of ligands, and
appeared to be potent in many catalytic applications [22,23].
Amongst the myriad of available NHC ligands, chiral unsym-
metrical NHC ligands appeared as particularly potent in asym-
metric catalysis, and were investigated in copper-catalyzed
conjugate additions [24]. Recently, a multicomponent synthesis
enabled the facile access to a wide variety of unsymmetrical
NHC precursors [25]. With this new methodology in hand,
Mauduit and co-workers synthesized several bidentate chiral
NHC precursors, using amino acids and amino alcohols as
starting materials, and tested them in copper-catalyzed ACA
[26]. Leucine-based L5 displayed the best performance in terms
of enantioselectivity, and was used in combination with
Cu(OTf)2 in the 1,6-ACA of cyclic dienones of the type 30
(Scheme 6). NHC ligands also enabled a total regioselectivity
and ees ranging from 58 to 91%.
Given the efficiency of (R)-Binap L4 in Cu-catalyzed 1,4-ACA
on α,β-unsaturated ketones [21], the potency of other atropoiso-
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2015, 11, 2418–2434.
2423
Scheme 4: Efficiency of DiPPAM ligand in 1,6-ACA of dialkylzinc to cyclic dienones.
Scheme 5: Sequential 1,6/1,4-ACA reactions involving linear aryldienones.
meric diphosphines was also studied in 1,4 and 1,6-conjugate
additions with cyclic and linear substrates [27]. (S)-Synphos L6
and (R)-Fluorophos L7 were used in combination with CuTC
and compared to L4 (Scheme 7). Notably, the reaction of cyclic
dienone 32 with diethylzinc proceeded at a typical catalyst
loading of 5 mol %, and afforded the 1,6-adduct. Among the
ligand series, L4 proved to form the most efficient system,
affording product 33 in 60% yield and 82% ee.
With Grignard reagentsLinear dienoates are another class of highly challenging
extended Michael acceptors, which were the focus of a work
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2015, 11, 2418–2434.
2424
Scheme 6: Unsymmetrical hydroxyalkyl NHC ligands in 1,6-ACA of cyclic dienones.
Scheme 7: Performance of atropoisomeric diphosphines in 1,6-ACA of Et2Zn on cyclic dienones.
reported by Feringa and co-workers in 2008 [28]. In this study,
the efficiency of ferrocene-based ligands was investigated for
the addition of Grignard reagents onto ethyl sorbate, using
CuBr·SMe2 as the copper source. Reversed Josiphos L8 was
selected as the most efficient ligand for this transformation, as a
1,6- vs 1,4-selectivity up to 99:1 could be achieved. The versa-
tility of the catalytic system was assessed with a wide substrate
scope featuring aliphatic, aromatic and functionalized dienoates
34 and various Grignard reagents. The reported products 35
were obtained in good yields (57–88%) and excellent ees
(72–97%). The applicability of the method was demonstrated
with the synthesis of a naturally occurring sulfated alkene, orig-
inally isolated from the echinus Temnopleureus hardwickii
(Scheme 8).
To be noted, the latter protocol proved unsuccessful in intro-
ducing a methyl group in extended Michael acceptors through
the addition of MeMgBr. A follow-up study then aimed
to tackle this challenge and demonstrated that α,β,γ,δ-unsatu-
rated thioesters 36 were the substrates of choice in order
to conduct this valuable transformation (Scheme 9) [29]. A
variety of α,β,γ,δ-unsaturated thioesters produced from a
Horner–Wadsworth–Emmons reagent were submitted to a 1,6-
ACA catalyzed by the L8/CuBr·SMe2 system, followed by a
reconjugation reaction in the presence of DBU to selectively
afford 37 (ratio between 1,6 and 1,4-ACA products ranged from
85/15 to 99/1) in high yields (78–88%) and enantioselectivities
(82–89%). The obtained α,β-unsaturated thioesters 37 were
subsequently reacted in a 1,4 copper-catalyzed ACA, using this
time L9 (Josiphos)/CuBr·SMe2. This approach enabled the syn-
thesis of anti (38) or syn (39) 1,3-deoxypropionate units
depending on the Josiphos enantiomer used, in both cases with
good enantioselectivities (85–92% ee). Subsequent chain elon-
gation followed by a 1,4-ACA reaction was described and
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2015, 11, 2418–2434.
2425
Scheme 8: Selective 1,6-ACA of Grignard reagents to acyclic dienoates, application in total synthesis.
Scheme 9: Reactivity of polyenic linear thioesters towards sequential 1,6-ACA/reconjugation/1,4-ACA and production of 1,3-deoxypropionate units.
enabled the enantioselective insertion of an additional methyl
group.
With trialkylaluminium reagentsOnly a few systems are known to perform efficiently 1,6-ACA
reactions using trialkylaluminium reagents as nucleophiles. In
2008, Alexakis, Mauduit and co-workers described the copper-
catalyzed 1,6-ACA of triethylaluminium on cyclic α,β,γ,δ-
unsaturated ketones using the phosphoramidite (S,R,R)-L2
ligand [18]. The reaction of the cyclic dienone 20 selectively
afforded the 1,6-adduct 21 in 53% yield and 68% ee
(Scheme 10). Displaying a similar reactivity, bicyclic Michael
acceptor 40 led to compound 41 in 45% yield and 69% ee.
In 2010, the Alexakis group explored the reactivity of α,β,γ,δ-
unsaturated nitroolefins and nitroenynes in Cu-catalyzed ACA
reactions with trialkylaluminium [30]. Several substrates were
investigated affording the 1,4-adducts in most cases. However,
high 1,6-selectivity with respect to the nitro group could only be
observed in the reaction of nitrodienoates 42 with trimethylalu-
minium (Scheme 11). The most efficient catalytic system, a
combination of Josiphos L9 as chiral ligand and copper thio-
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2015, 11, 2418–2434.
2426
Scheme 10: 1,6-Conjugate addition of trialkylaluminium with regards to cyclic dienones.
Scheme 11: Copper-catalyzed conjugate addition of trimethylaluminium onto nitro dienoates.
phene 2-carboxylate (CuTC) afforded the desired 1,6-adducts
43 with very good regioselectivity (up to 5/95) and enantio-
selectivities (up to 91% ee).
Enantioselective 1,4-addition to extendedMichael acceptorsWith dialkylzinc reagentsDialkylzinc reagents are without a doubt highly potent nucleo-
philes in copper-catalyzed ACA often leading to 1,6-adducts
onto polyconjugated electron-deficient substrates. However,
examples of their use for 1,4-additions can also be found in the
literature. In 2004, Hoveyda and co-workers described the total
synthesis of the antimicobacterial agent erogorgiaene
(Scheme 12) [31]. One of the key steps of this synthesis
involved the conversion of the bicyclic extended Michael
acceptor 44 to 45 through a 1,4-selective copper-catalyzed
ACA. Copper(I) triflate and chiral phosphine ligand L10
enabled this transformation to proceed with a yield of 50% and
an excellent diastereoselectivity (de 94%).
The Hoveyda group was also interested in developing efficient
methods for the generation of quaternary stereogenic centers
from Michael acceptors via copper-catalyzed 1,4-ACA of
diethylzinc onto cyclic Michael acceptors [32]. When the
catalytic system was formed in situ from chiral NHC-based L11
and (CuOTf)2·C6H6, a large library of substrates was tested, and
good yields and ees were consistently observed. Among the
Michael acceptors that were submitted to the reaction condi-
tions, cyclic enynone 46 selectively led to the 1,4-adduct 47,
and the ethyl moiety was inserted with 74% enantiomeric
excess in 78% yield (Scheme 13).
Very recently, a new study dealing with the reactivity of unsatu-
rated acyl-N-methylimidazole substrates in copper-catalyzed
ACA was released by Mauduit, Campagne and co-workers [33].
Unsymmetrical bidentate hydroxyalkyl precursor L12 led to the
most efficient system in the insertion of methyl groups in such
architectures, being highly versatile synthetic platforms [34,35].
A wide variety of α,β-unsaturated acyl-N-methylimidazoles
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2015, 11, 2418–2434.
2427
Scheme 12: Copper-catalyzed selective 1,4-ACA in total synthesis of erogorgiaene.
Scheme 13: 1,4-selective addition of diethylzinc onto a cyclic enynone catalyzed by a chiral NHC-based system.
Scheme 14: Cu-NHC-catalyzed 1,6-ACA of dimethylzinc onto an α,β,γ,δ-unsaturated acyl-N-methylimidazole.
could thus be reacted in high yields and enantioselectivities.
Notably, the reactivity of polyenic species 48 was also investi-
gated (Scheme 14). Interestingly, the 1,4-adduct was here
formed in high regioselectivity (95%), good yield (68%) and
stereoselectivity (ee 92%). Interestingly, the usefulness of the
products of 1,4-ACA was demonstrated as the latter were
converted into the corresponding aldehydes and subsequently
used in an iterative process, leading to highly desirable 1,3-
deoxypropionate units.
With Grignard reagentsIn 2008, Alexakis, Mauduit and coworkers extensively studied
the influence of the parameters controlling the regioselectivity
outcome of the ACA reaction with α,β,δ,γ-unsaturated ketones
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2015, 11, 2418–2434.
2428
Scheme 15: 1,4-Selectivity in conjugate addition on extended systems with the concomitant use of a chelating chiral hydroxyalkyl NHC and of a Grig-nard reagent.
[18]. Using a Grignard reagent as the nucleophile, it appeared
that catalytic systems based on phosphoramidite ligands favored
the formation of the 1,6-adduct. However, the use of catalytic
systems based on an hydroxyalkyl NHC ligand (Cu(OTf)2/L13)
resulted in a surprising inversion of the regioselectivity. Indeed,
the addition of ethylmagnesium bromide onto cyclic dienones
occurred at the 1,4-position, affording compounds featuring an
all-carbon quaternary center. The authors suggested that the
chelating hydroxyalkyl chain was at the origin of this particular
reactivity. The addition of other linear Grignard reagents on the
substrates of the type 50 showed a near-perfect 1,4-regioselec-
tivity, while the amount of 1,4-adduct dropped when branched
nucleophiles were used. Despite this decrease in regioselec-
tivity, the reaction remained highly enantioselective, with ees
ranging from 88 to 99% for compounds 51. Notably, attempts to
add a methyl moiety through the addition of MeMgBr to the
cyclic dienone featuring a disubstituted terminal double bond
(R1 = Me, R2 = H) only resulted in an achiral 1,6-addition prod-
uct. Subsequent transformations of the γ,δ-unsaturated 1,4-
adducts were successfully performed: an oxidative cleavage
afforded for example ketoester 52 (Scheme 15). Moreover, the
in situ trapping of the addition product with acetic anhydride led
to the regeneration of the lithium enolate, which was allylated
and submitted to ring closing metathesis to afford the bicyclic
product 53. Finally, the RCM of the 1,4-adduct resulting from
the addition of 3-butenylmagnesium bromide yielded the spiro
compound 54. Interestingly, the conversion of bicyclic com-
pound 40 catalyzed by the same system also occurred selec-
tively in the 4-position (55 was formed in 73% yield, 96% ee).
The scope of the reaction was extended to many new substrates
in 2012, evidencing that the 1,4-selectivity of the transforma-
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2015, 11, 2418–2434.
2429
Scheme 16: Cu-NHC catalyzed 1,4-ACA as the key step in the total synthesis of ent-riccardiphenol B.
tion remained with trienones 56, as the polyunsaturated prod-
ucts 57 were obtained with good yield and excellent enantio-
selectivities (up to 95%) [36].
To demonstrate the high synthetic significance of a selective
1,4-ACA performed on extended systems, its implementation in
the total synthesis of ent-riccardiphenol B was attempted using
the L13/Cu(OTf)2 system (Scheme 16) [36]. The conditions for
the addition of methylmagnesium bromide were varied in order
to maximize the conversion of trienone 58 towards 59. A mix-
ture of the three addition products was however consistently
observed, and despite an ee of 85%, the conversion towards the
desired product did not exceed 37%.
Cyclic enynones 60, which are substrates of high interest for the
synthetic chemist, were regioselectively converted in good
yields to the 1,4-ACA products 61 with good to excellent
enantioselectivity (79 to 96% ee) using the L13/Cu(OTf)2
catalytic system [36,37]. It is important to note that the regiose-
lectivity outcome for the addition of methyl Grignard reagent
appeared to be more substrate-dependent [36]. In fact, the best
1,4-selectivities were observed with bulky R groups, as a 100/0
1,4/1,6 ratio was observed with R = TIPS while substrate 60
with R = n-Bu afforded a 23/77 1,4/1,6 ratio. Moreover, the
obtained products 61 could be subsequently converted to the
spiro compounds 62 and 63 (Scheme 17).
The same protocol was later applied to conjugated enynones
featuring additional unsaturated units and a total regioselec-
tivity towards the 1,4-adducts was recorded under the standard
conditions (Scheme 17) [36]. The chiral polyconjugated prod-
ucts (64–66) were isolated in good yields (60 to 80% yields)
with good to excellent enantioselectivity (77 to 93% ee).
In 2013, Xie, Zhang and co-workers investigated the reactivity
of extended unsaturated linear ketones in the presence of Grig-
nard reagents, with the aim of selectively forming the 1,4-ACA
adducts [38]. Various ligands were tested and the best catalytic
performance was achieved using bidentate ferrocene-based
ligand L14 in combination with tetrakis(acetonitrile)copper(I)
perchlorate as the copper source. The conversion of aromatic
linear dienones 67 was reported with a complete regioselec-
tivity towards the 1,4-adducts 68. Moreover, the variation of the
steric and electronic parameters of both aromatic moieties of 67
confirmed the robustness of the method, with good yields and
ees obtained in most cases (Scheme 18).
With trialkylaluminium reagentsThe Hoveyda group disclosed the first example of copper-
catalyzed selective 1,4-ACA of low-cost trialkylaluminium
reagents on extended Michael acceptors in 2008 [39]. The
reported catalytic system, featuring Cu(OTf)2 and sulfonated
NHC-based silver complex L15 as the ligand source, appeared
as the most potent system in the conversion of cyclic enones.
Enynone 69 was reacted to assess the versatility of the reaction,
and a full 1,4-regioselectivity was recorded, leading to com-
pound 70 in 71% yield and 91% ee (Scheme 19).
Another example of trialkylaluminium addition onto a cyclic
extended Michael acceptor was reported in 2013, using a
combination of copper(II) naphthenate (CuNaph) and Simple-
Phos L16 as the catalytic system [40]. The reported method-
ology involved a regioselective 1,4 ACA of trimethylalu-
minium followed by the trapping of the aluminium enolate
intermediate with (n-butoxymethyl)diethylamine. An oxi-
dation–elimination sequence and a conjugate addition of a Grig-
nard reagent to the newly formed exocyclic double bound were
subsequently performed. Overall, this four-step process
afforded the sterically congested cyclohexanone 72 in a 30%
overall yield, with a dr of 2:1 and 96% ee (Scheme 20).
In 2012, Alexakis and Gremaud studied the reactivity of various
β,γ-unsaturated α-ketoesters, which remain to date the only
report dealing with such substrates in Cu-catalyzed ACA of
trialkylaluminium [41]. Using the (R)-Binap-based system L4/
CuTC, an excellent 1,4-selectivity was achieved with mono-
unsaturated substrates. Dienic ketoester 73 was also tested with
this catalytic system, and 1,4-adduct 74 was formed with a
perfect regioselectivity, in high 92% yield and with a remark-
able enantioselectivity of 98% (Scheme 21).
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2015, 11, 2418–2434.
2430
Scheme 17: Cu-NHC-catalyzed 1,4-selective ACA reactions with enynones.
Scheme 18: Linear dienones as substrates in 1,4-asymmetric conjugate addition reactions of Grignard reagents catalyzed by a copper-based system.
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2015, 11, 2418–2434.
2431
Scheme 19: 1,4-ACA of trimethylaluminium to a cyclic enynone catalyzed by a copper-NHC system.
Scheme 20: Generation of a sterically encumbered chiral cyclohexanone from a polyunsaturated cyclic Michael acceptor.
Scheme 21: Selective conversion of β,γ-unsaturated α-ketoesters in copper-catalyzed asymmetric conjugate addition.
In their report looking into the reactivity of α,β,γ,δ-unsaturated
nitroolefins [30], Alexakis and co-workers could also attain a
perfect 1,4-regioselectivity in the addition of trialkylaluminium
reagents. Many nitroenynes such as 75 could then be converted
to a wide variety of enantioenriched products 76 (83 to 95% ee)
using copper thiophenecarboxylate (CuTC) as the copper source
and Josiphos L9 as chiral ligand (Scheme 22).
Additionally, a collection of nitrodienes 77 was reacted using
this same methodology, and a reactivity similar to the one of
nitroenynes was observed: 1,4-adducts 78 were obtained with
good to very good enantioselectivity (77 to 90% ee) and perfect
regioselectivity (Scheme 23).
Enantioselective 1,10- and 1,8-addition toextended Michael acceptorsRecently, Feringa and co-workers released an extensive work
dealing with the influence of various parameters in copper-
catalyzed ACA of Grignard reagents on extended Michael
acceptors [42]. Using “reversed Josiphos” L8, a well estab-
lished ligand for enantio- and regioselective 1,6-additions onto
dienoates [28], a wide variety of polyconjugated substrates were
tested in order to gain a better insight into the reaction mecha-
nism. Amongst the investigated electrophiles, substrates 79
(n = 1 or 2) could potentially undergo 1,8- or 1,10-conjugated
addition, respectively. As shown in Scheme 24, the addition of
the Grignard reagent occurred preferentially at the most remote
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2015, 11, 2418–2434.
2432
Scheme 22: Addition of trialkylaluminium compounds to nitroenynes catalyzed by L9/CuTC.
Scheme 23: Addition of trialkylaluminium compounds to nitrodienes catalyzed by L9/CuTC.
Scheme 24: Copper catalyzed 1,8- and 1,10-ACA reactions.
olefin. To be noted, polyenic esters gave a slight regioselec-
tivity towards the 1,8- and 1,10-products and low enantio-
selectivities. Remarkably, only a small portion (<10%) of
“intermediate” addition products (1,6-adducts when n = 1 and
1,6- and 1,8-adducts when n = 2) was detected in all cases. The
nature of the substrate seemed to also have an influence since
better results were obtained when the thioester was used as a
starting material, in both 1,8- (63% yield, 72% ee) and 1,10-
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2015, 11, 2418–2434.
2433
ACA (44% yield, 45% ee). As a trend, the regio- and stereose-
lectivity decreased when the reacting olefin is further from the
electron-withdrawing functionality. Additional studies would
enable to determine the factors allowing for an improvement of
the reaction outcome, as an efficient protocol allowing 3 to 4
sequential ACA reactions would be highly desirable for syn-
thetic chemists.
ConclusionThis review attempts to give the reader an overview of the
methodologies available to perform regio- and enantioselective
copper-catalyzed asymmetric conjugate additions (ACA) on
electron-deficient extended unsaturated systems. Since the
initial discoveries looking into the conjugate addition of
cuprates to extended Michael acceptors, substantial research has
been undertaken to develop efficient methodologies enabling
such reactions in a regio- and enantioselective manner, with
significant breakthroughs. Nowadays, a number of ACA pro-
cedures with a various electron-deficient polyenic substrates
(linear and cyclic dienones, dienoates, conjugated thioesters,
nitroolefins and nitroenynes, enynones, unsaturated acyl-N-
methylimidazoles and conjugated ketoesters) and nucleophiles
(dialkylzinc, Grignard or trialkylaluminium reagents) are avail-
able. These protocols have shown to be highly dependent on
both substrates and reaction conditions. Therefore, a variety of
efficient chiral ligands is now available for the chemist willing
to design synthetic routes leading to complex chiral molecules.
Nonetheless, a number of potential Michael acceptors and
catalytic systems have yet to be explored in order to further
expand this useful toolbox.
AcknowledgementsThis work was supported by the Agence Nationale de la
Recherche (project SCATE, n° ANR-12-B507-0009-01 grant to
SDA). MM and OB also thank the CNRS.
References1. Mauduit, M.; Baslé, O.; Clavier, H.; Crévisy, C.; Denicourt-Nowicki, A.
In Comprehensive Organic Synthesis, 2nd ed.; Molander, G. A.;Knochel, P., Eds.; Elsevier: Oxford, 2014; Vol. 4, pp 189–341.doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-097742-3.00406-7
2. Calvo, B. C.; Buter, J.; Minnard, A. J. Applications to the synthesis ofnatural products. In Copper-Catalyzed Asymmetric Synthesis;Alexakis, A.; Krause, N.; Woodward, S., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim,2014; pp 373–447. doi:10.1002/9783527664573.ch14
3. Csákÿ, A. G.; de la Herrán, G.; Murcia, M. C. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010,39, 4080–4102. doi:10.1039/b924486g
4. Näf, F.; Degen, P.; Ohloff, G. Helv. Chim. Acta 1972, 55, 82–85.doi:10.1002/hlca.19720550112
5. Corey, E. J.; Kim, C. U.; Chen, R. H. K.; Takeda, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.1972, 94, 4395–4396. doi:10.1021/ja00767a088
6. Yamamoto, Y.; Yamamoto, S.; Yatagai, H.; Ishihara, Y.; Maruyama, K.J. Org. Chem. 1982, 47, 119–126. doi:10.1021/jo00340a026
7. Krause, N.; Gerold, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36,186–204. doi:10.1002/anie.199701861
8. Barbot, F.; Kadib-Elban, A.; Miginiac, P. J. Organomet. Chem. 1983,255, 1–9. doi:10.1016/0022-328X(83)80167-3
9. Hulce, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1988, 29, 5851–5854.doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(00)82207-8
10. Krause, N. Chem. Ber. 1990, 123, 2173–2180.doi:10.1002/cber.19901231114
11. Mori, S.; Uerdigen, M.; Krause, N.; Morokuma, K.Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 4715–4719.doi:10.1002/anie.200462976
12. Yoshikai, N.; Yamashita, T.; Nakamura, E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.2005, 44, 4721–4723. doi:10.1002/anie.200501107
13. Yoshikai, N.; Yamashita, T.; Nakamura, E. Chem. – Asian J. 2006, 1,322–330. doi:10.1002/asia.200600034
14. Wieland, P.; Anner, G. Helv. Chim. Acta 1967, 50, 289–296.doi:10.1002/hlca.19670500136
15. Alexakis, A.; Chapdelaine, M. J.; Posner, G. H.; Runquist, A. W.Tetrahedron Lett. 1978, 19, 4205–4208.doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(01)95182-2
16. Tissot, M.; Li, H.; Alexakis, A. Copper-catalyzed asymmetric conjugateaddition and allylic substitution of organometallic reagents to extendedmultiple bond systems. In Copper catalyzed asymmetric synthesis;Alexakis, A.; Krause, N.; Woodward, S., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim,2014; pp 69–84. doi:10.1002/9783527664573.ch3
17. Fillion, E.; Wilsily, A.; Liao, E. T. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2006, 17,2957–2959. doi:10.1016/j.tetasy.2006.11.009
18. Hénon, H.; Mauduit, M.; Alexakis, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47,9122–9124. doi:10.1002/anie.200803735
19. Wencel-Delord, J.; Alexakis, A.; Crévisy, C.; Mauduit, M. Org. Lett.2010, 12, 4335–4337. doi:10.1021/ol1017382
20. Magrez, M.; Wencel-Delord, J.; Alexakis, A.; Crévisy, C.; Mauduit, M.Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 3576–3579. doi:10.1021/ol300866p
21. Magrez-Chiquet, M.; Morin, M. S. T.; Wencel-Delord, J.;Drissi Amraoui, S.; Baslé, O.; Alexakis, A.; Crévisy, C.; Mauduit, M.Chem. – Eur. J. 2013, 19, 13663–13667. doi:10.1002/chem.201302649
22. Díez-González, S. N-Heterocyclic Carbenes; RSC Catalysis Series;RSC Publishing: Cambridge, 2011.
23. Díez-González, S.; Marion, N.; Nolan, S. P. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109,3612–3676. doi:10.1021/cr900074m
24. Clavier, H.; Coutable, L.; Guillemin, J.-C.; Mauduit, M.Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2005, 16, 921–924.doi:10.1016/j.tetasy.2005.01.015See for an early example.
25. Queval, P.; Jahier, C.; Rouen, M.; Artur, I.; Legeay, J.-C.; Falivene, L.;Toupet, L.; Crévisy, C.; Cavallo, L.; Baslé, O.; Mauduit, M.Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 14103–14107.doi:10.1002/anie.201308873
26. Jahier-Diallo, C.; Morin, M. S. T.; Queval, P.; Rouen, M.; Artur, I.;Querard, P.; Toupet, L.; Crévisy, C.; Baslé, O.; Mauduit, M.Chem. – Eur. J. 2015, 21, 993–997. doi:10.1002/chem.201405765
27. Morin, M. S. T.; Vives, T.; Baslé, O.; Crévisy, C.;Ratovelomanana-Vidal, V.; Mauduit, M. Synthesis 2015, 47,2570–2577. doi:10.1055/s-0034-1378813
28. den Hartog, T.; Harutyunyan, S. R.; Font, D.; Minnaard, A. J.;Feringa, B. L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 398–401.doi:10.1002/anie.200703702
29. den Hartog, T.; van Dijken, D. J.; Font, D.; Minnaard, A. J.;Feringa, B. L. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2010, 21, 1574–1584.doi:10.1016/j.tetasy.2010.04.057
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2015, 11, 2418–2434.
2434
30. Tissot, M.; Müller, D.; Belot, S.; Alexakis, A. Org. Lett. 2010, 12,2770–2773. doi:10.1021/ol100849j
31. Cesati, R. R., III; de Armas, J.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc.2004, 126, 96–101. doi:10.1021/ja0305407
32. Lee, K.-s.; Brown, M. K.; Hird, A. W.; Hoveyda, A. H.J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 7182–7184. doi:10.1021/ja062061o
33. Drissi-Amraoui, S.; Morin, M. S. T.; Crévisy, C.; Baslé, O.;Marcia de Figueiredo, R.; Mauduit, M.; Campagne, J.-M.Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 11830–11834.doi:10.1002/anie.201506189
34. Ohta, S.; Hayakawa, S.; Nishimura, K.; Okamoto, M.Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1987, 35, 1058–1069. doi:10.1248/cpb.35.1058
35. Evans, D. A.; Song, H.-J.; Fandrick, K. R. Org. Lett. 2006, 8,3351–3354. doi:10.1021/ol061223i
36. Tissot, M.; Poggiali, D.; Henon, H.; Müller, D.; Guénée, L.; Mauduit, M.;Alexakis, A. Chem. – Eur. J. 2012, 18, 8731–8747.doi:10.1002/chem.201200502
37. Tissot, M.; Pérez-Hernàndez, A.; Müller, D.; Mauduit, M.; Alexakis, A.Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 1524–1527. doi:10.1021/ol200219m
38. Ma, Z.; Xie, F.; Yu, H.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, X.; Zhang, W. Chem. Commun.2013, 49, 5292–5294. doi:10.1039/c3cc42088d
39. May, T. L.; Brown, M. K.; Hoveyda, A. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008,47, 7358–7362. doi:10.1002/anie.200802910
40. Bleschke, C.; Tissot, M.; Müller, D.; Alexakis, A. Org. Lett. 2013, 15,2152–2155. doi:10.1021/ol400642y
41. Gremaud, L.; Alexakis, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 794–797.doi:10.1002/anie.201107324
42. den Hartog, T.; Huang, Y.; Fañanás-Mastral, M.; Meuwese, A.;Rudolph, A.; Pérez, M.; Minnaard, A. J.; Feringa, B. L. ACS Catal.2015, 5, 560–574. doi:10.1021/cs501297s
License and TermsThis is an Open Access article under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which
permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in
any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The license is subject to the Beilstein Journal of Organic
Chemistry terms and conditions:
(http://www.beilstein-journals.org/bjoc)
The definitive version of this article is the electronic one
which can be found at:
doi:10.3762/bjoc.11.263