copyright © 2003 mcgraw hill ryerson limited 8-1 prepared by: carol edwards ba, mba, cfa...
TRANSCRIPT
copyright © 2003 McGraw Hill Ryerson Limited
8-18-1
prepared by:Carol EdwardsBA, MBA, CFA
Instructor, FinanceBritish Columbia Institute of Technology
Fundamentals
of Corporate
Finance
Second Canadian Edition
copyright © 2003 McGraw Hill Ryerson Limited
8-28-2
Chapter 8Project Analysis
Chapter Outline How Firms Organize the Investment
Process Some “What If” Questions Break-Even Analysis Flexibility in Capital Budgeting Capital Budgeting Practices in Canadian
Firms
copyright © 2003 McGraw Hill Ryerson Limited
8-38-3
The Investment Decision• How Firms Organize the Investment Process
Once a year, a firm’s head office will generally ask each of its divisions to provide a list of the investments they would like to make.
A list of planned investments is known as the capital budget.
This “wish list” must then be examined to determine which projects should go forward.
How is this done?
copyright © 2003 McGraw Hill Ryerson Limited
8-48-4
Some “What If” Questions• Introduction
Managers want to understand more than the NPV of a project.
They also want to predict what events could happen and how that might affect NPV.Once they have done this, management
can decide if it is worthwhile investing more time and effort in understanding the uncertainty and trying to resolve it.
copyright © 2003 McGraw Hill Ryerson Limited
8-58-5
Some “What If” Questions• Introduction
There are five methods managers use to handle project uncertainty:Sensitivity AnalysisScenario AnalysisSimulation AnalysisBreak-Even AnalysisOperating Leverage Analysis
copyright © 2003 McGraw Hill Ryerson Limited
8-68-6
Some “What If” Questions• Sensitivity Analysis
A sensitivity analysis calculates the consequences of incorrectly estimating a variable in your NPV analysis.
If forces you: To identify the variables underlying your analysis. To focus on how changes to these variables could
impact the expected NPV. To consider what additional information should be
collected to resolve uncertainties about the variables.
copyright © 2003 McGraw Hill Ryerson Limited
8-78-7
Some “What If” Questions• Sensitivity Analysis
Suppose, as a financial manager, you have estimated the cash flow forecasts for a new grocery store.
These are shown on on the next slide. The project has a positive NPV of $478,000. Before you recommend the project to your
boss, you want to analyze the forecast and identify the key variables which will determine whether the project succeeds or fails.
copyright © 2003 McGraw Hill Ryerson Limited
8-88-8
Some “What If” Questions
Cash Flow Forecasts: Year 0 Years 1-12Investment ($5,400)Sales $16,000Variable Costs (81.25% of Sales) 13,000 Fixed Costs 2,000 Depreciation (Straight Line) 450 Pretax Profit 550 Taxes @ 40% 220 Profit after Tax 330 Cash Flow from Operations 780
Net Cash Flow ($5,400) $780
copyright © 2003 McGraw Hill Ryerson Limited
8-98-9
Some “What If” Questions•Sensitivity Analysis
You want to look at how the NPV of the project may be affected by an incorrect forecast of sales, costs, etc.
You develop the optimistic and pessimistic estimates for the underlying variables which are shown on the next slide.
copyright © 2003 McGraw Hill Ryerson Limited
8-108-10
Some “What If” Questions• Sensitivity Analysis
You will use the estimates below, one at time, to recalculate NPV:
Variable: Optimistic Expected Pessimistic
Investment $6,200 $5,400 $5,000Sales $14,000 $16,000 $18,000Variable Costs as a % of Sales 83.00% 81.25% 80.00%Fixed Costs $2,100 $2,000 $1,900
Range in dollars
copyright © 2003 McGraw Hill Ryerson Limited
8-118-11
Some “What If” Questions•Sensitivity Analysis
For example, if the initial investment in the project were $6.2 million, instead of $5.4 m, you would recalculate NPV as:
NPV = PV of Cash Flows - Investment (C0)
= [$806,667 x 12 year annuity factor] - 6.2 m= [$806,667 x 7.536] – 6.2 m= -$120,897 *
* Don’t forget to change the depreciation for the project!
copyright © 2003 McGraw Hill Ryerson Limited
8-128-12
Some “What If” Questions• Sensitivity Analysis
After all the recalculations, you would have the following estimates:
Variable: Optimistic Expected Pessimistic
Investment ($121,000) $478,000 $778,000Sales ($1,218,000) $478,000 $2,174,000Variable Costs as a % of Sales ($788,000) $478,000 $1,382,000Fixed Costs $26,000 $478,000 $930,000
NPV in dollars
copyright © 2003 McGraw Hill Ryerson Limited
8-138-13
Some “What If” Questions• Sensitivity Analysis
You now know how badly the project could be thrown off course by changes in certain variables.
Looking at the table on the previous slide, can you answer the following questions:
What is the least critical variable to the success of the project?
What are the two most critical variables to the success of the project?
copyright © 2003 McGraw Hill Ryerson Limited
8-148-14
Some “What If” Questions• Sensitivity Analysis
Did you identify fixed costs as the least critical variable?
Even under the pessimistic assumption about fixed costs, the project has a positive NPV, so it is unlikely to give you trouble if you have estimated it incorrectly.
Did you identify sales and variable costs as the most critical variables?
A poor estimate of either of these could lead to a significantly negative NPV for the project.
copyright © 2003 McGraw Hill Ryerson Limited
8-158-15
Some “What If” Questions•Sensitivity Analysis
Now that you have identified the critical success/failure factors, you may wish to focus your attention on them:You might collect additional data on sales
and costs so as to resolve some of the uncertainty concerning these variables.
copyright © 2003 McGraw Hill Ryerson Limited
8-168-16
Some “What If” Questions•Sensitivity Analysis
Sensitivity analysis is not a “cure-all”. It does have its drawbacks:
The results are ambiguous since the terms “optimistic” and “pessimistic” are completely subjective.
Variables are often related and it may be difficult to identify all of the consequences associated with a change in one of them.
copyright © 2003 McGraw Hill Ryerson Limited
8-178-17
Some “What If” Questions•Scenario Analysis
A scenario analysis involves changing several variables at once in your NPV forecast.See Example 8.2
copyright © 2003 McGraw Hill Ryerson Limited
8-188-18
Some “What If” Questions•Simulation Analysis
A simulation analysis uses a computer to generate hundreds, or even thousands, of possible scenarios.
A probability distribution is assigned to each combination of variables to create an entire range of potential outcomes.
copyright © 2003 McGraw Hill Ryerson Limited
8-198-19
Break-Even Analysis• Accounting vs NPV Break-Even Analysis
A Break-Even analysis shows the level of sales at which a company “breaks even”. An accounting break-even occurs where total
revenues equal total costs (profits equal zero). A NPV break-even occurs when the NPV of the
project equals zero. Using accounting break-even can lead to poor
decisions. You can avoid this risk by using NPV break-even in
your analysis!
copyright © 2003 McGraw Hill Ryerson Limited
8-208-20
Break-Even Analysis•Accounting Break-Even
An accounting break-even occurs where total revenues equal total costs, and thus profits are zero.
How do we calculate this point?
copyright © 2003 McGraw Hill Ryerson Limited
8-218-21
Break-Even Analysis• Accounting Break-Even
Go back to the cash flow analysis you did on Slide #8: You estimated sales to be $16 million. Variable costs were 81.25% of sales ($0.8125 of
variable costs per $1 of sales). Fixed costs were $2 million and depreciation was
$450,000. These variables are all you need to calculate
accounting break-even!
copyright © 2003 McGraw Hill Ryerson Limited
8-228-22
Break-Even Analysis•Accounting Break-Even
Accounting break-even is calculated as:
Break-Even Revenues = Fixed Costs + DepreciationProfit per $1 of Sales
= $2,000 + $450 $1 - $0.8125
= $2,450 $0.1875
= $13.067 million
copyright © 2003 McGraw Hill Ryerson Limited
8-238-23
Break-Even Analysis•Accounting Break-Even
Creating an income statement at $13.067 million of sales shows profit equals zero:
Revenues $13,067
Variable Costs 10,067
Fixed Costs + Depreciation 2,450
Pretax Profit 0
Taxes 0
Profit after Tax 0
copyright © 2003 McGraw Hill Ryerson Limited
8-248-24
Break-Even Analysis•Accounting Break-Even
If a project breaks even in accounting terms is it an acceptable investment?
Clue: This project has a 12 year life …
Would you be happy with an investment which after 12 years gave you a zero
total rate of return?
copyright © 2003 McGraw Hill Ryerson Limited
8-258-25
Break-Even Analysis• Accounting Break-Even
A project which simply breaks even on an accounting basis will always have a negative NPV!
Proof:
NPV = PV of Cash Flows – C0
= [$450,000 * (12 year Annuity Factor)] - $5.4 m $0
Note: the 12 year Annuity Factor 12 for all discount rates!
CFO= profit after tax + depreciation
= $0 + $450,000 = $450,000
copyright © 2003 McGraw Hill Ryerson Limited
8-268-26
Break-Even Analysis•NPV Break-Even
Asking how bad sales can get before a project makes an accounting loss is not the best tool for analysis of a project.
Instead, it is more useful to focus on the point at which NPV switches from negative to positive.
Let’s develop a method for calculating this NPV break-even!
copyright © 2003 McGraw Hill Ryerson Limited
8-278-27
Break-Even Analysis• NPV Break-Even
Going back to our example:
Pretax Profit
(0.1875 Sales) - 2.45 m
Note: Cash flow = Depreciation + After Tax Profit
Variable Costs
81.25% of Sales+ Fixed Costs + Depreciation
$2.45 m
- Tax @ 40%
0.40 x [(0.1875 Sales) - 2.45 m] After Tax Profit
0.60 x [(0.1875 Sales) - 2.45 m] Cash flow $0.45 m + 0.60 x [(0.1875 Sales) - 2.45 m]
= 0.1125 * Sales - $1.02 m
copyright © 2003 McGraw Hill Ryerson Limited
8-288-28
Break-Even Analysis• NPV Break-Even
This cash flow will last for 12 years.
But: NPV = 0 if PV (cash flows) = C0
NPV = 0 if (0.1125 x Sales – 1.02 m) x 7.536 = 5.4 m
Sales = $15.4 m
PV(cash flows) = Cash Flows x Annuity Factor
= (0.1125 x Sales - 1.02 m) x 12 year Annuity Factor
= (0.1125 x Sales - 1.02 m) x 7.536
copyright © 2003 McGraw Hill Ryerson Limited
8-298-29
Break-Even Analysis•NPV Break-Even
Using the accounting break-even, the project had to generate sales of $13.067 million to have zero profit.
Using the NPV break-even, we find that the project needs sales of $15.4 million to have a zero NPV. The project needs to be 18% more successful to
break-even on a NPV basis!
copyright © 2003 McGraw Hill Ryerson Limited
8-308-30
Break-Even Analysis• Degree of Operating Leverage (DOL)
Let’s say you are predicting a 1% change in the sales of your firm. How will that change affect your firm’s profits?
1) A 1% change in sales could lead to a 1% change in profits.
This would be a very stable situation.
2) Or, it could lead to a 50% change in profits. This would be a very risky and volatile
situation.
copyright © 2003 McGraw Hill Ryerson Limited
8-318-31
Break-Even Analysis•Degree of Operating Leverage (DOL)
Operating leverage is a measure of the percentage of a firm’s costs that are fixed.
Degree of Operating Leverage (DOL) measures the percentage change in profits given a 1% change in sales. If DOL = 1, then a 1% change in sales will
produce a 1% change in profits. If DOL = 50, then a 1% change in sales will
produce a 50% change in profits.
copyright © 2003 McGraw Hill Ryerson Limited
8-328-32
Break-Even Analysis•Degree of Operating Leverage (DOL)
There are two ways of measuring DOL:
Note that the level of fixed costs in a company will determine DOL and how volatile its profits are in
response to a change in sales.
DOL = percentage change in profits
percentage change in sales
DOL = 1 + fixed costs
profits
copyright © 2003 McGraw Hill Ryerson Limited
8-338-33
Break-Even Analysis•Degree of Operating Leverage (DOL)
If you examine Table 8.4 on page 256, you will see that the risk of a project is affected by its DOL. If a large proportion of the project’s costs are
fixed, then DOL will be high. If DOL is high, then any shortfall in sales will
have a magnified effect on profits. In other words, high DOL means high risk
if sales do not work out as forecasted!
copyright © 2003 McGraw Hill Ryerson Limited
8-348-34
Flexibility in Capital Budgeting
•The Value of Having Options No matter how much analysis you do on
a project, it is impossible to completely eliminate uncertainty.
Can you think of any way:To mitigate the effect of unpleasant surprises.
andTo take advantage of pleasant ones?
copyright © 2003 McGraw Hill Ryerson Limited
8-358-35
Flexibility in Capital Budgeting
• The Value of Having Options Because the future is uncertain, successful
financial managers seek projects with flexibility.
The perfect project would have:The option to expand if things go well.The option to bail out or switch production if
things go poorly.The option to postpone if future conditions
might improve.
copyright © 2003 McGraw Hill Ryerson Limited
8-368-36
Flexibility in Capital Budgeting
• The Value of Having Options Options
to avoid a loss, switch production or abandona project;
to expand and produce extra profit; or to postpone action
have significant value for a firm. Good outcomes can be exploited, while poor
outcomes can be avoided or postponed.
copyright © 2003 McGraw Hill Ryerson Limited
8-378-37
Flexibility in Capital Budgeting•The Value of Having Options
Decision trees are used to diagram the options in a project.You can then determine the optimal course
of action from a series of potential options. A decision tree is defined as a diagram
of sequential decisions and their possible outcomes.Figure 8.3 is an example of a decision tree.
copyright © 2003 McGraw Hill Ryerson Limited
8-388-38
Flexibility in Capital Budgeting
•The Value of Having Options As a general rule, flexibility will be most
valuable to you when the future is most uncertain.
The ability to change course as events develop and new information becomes available is most valuable when it is hard to predict with confidence what the best course of action will be.
copyright © 2003 McGraw Hill Ryerson Limited
8-398-39
Canadian Practices• Capital Budgeting Practices in Canadian Firms
In Table 8.7 on page 262, you can see how Canadian firms are actually making capital budgeting decisions.
Most firms use multiple methods for analyzing a project’s acceptability.
Note that discounted cash flow techniques were used by more than 75% of respondents.
copyright © 2003 McGraw Hill Ryerson Limited
8-408-40
Summary of Chapter 8 Successful managers know that the
forecasts behind NPV calculations are imperfect.
Thus, they explore the consequences to the firm of a poor forecast.
They check whether the project is really worth pursuing by doing some additional homework.This consists of asking a series of “what-if”
questions to determine the feasibility of the project and its risk profile.
copyright © 2003 McGraw Hill Ryerson Limited
8-418-41
Summary of Chapter 8 The principal tools used by managers in
“what-if” questions are:Sensitivity AnalysisScenario AnalysisSimulation AnalysisBreak-Even AnalysisOperating Leverage
A desirable characteristic in a project is flexibility.
copyright © 2003 McGraw Hill Ryerson Limited
8-428-42
Summary of Chapter 8 Projects with options to expand,
abandon, switch production, or postpone actions may have added value to the firm.
You can use decision trees to analyze such flexibility.
A survey of Canadian firms shows that most use multiple capital budgeting methods to assess projects.