copyright © 2007 pearson education canada 1 chapter 13: audit of the sales and collection cycle:...
TRANSCRIPT
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada1
Chapter 13: Audit of the Sales and Collection Cycle:
Tests of Controls
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
13-2
Chapter 13 objectives
Identify typical records and transactions in the sales cycle
Explain how general controls affect the audit of the sales and collection cycle
Describe the methodology for designing tests of controls for sales
Discuss the effect of the results of tests of controls on the audit
Explain how the tests of control audit program organized
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
13-3
Classes of transactions in the sales and collection cycle
Sales (cash and on account) Cash receipts Sales returns and allowances Charge-off (or write-off) of uncollectible
accounts Bad-debt expense
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
13-4
Typical records and transactions in the sales cycle
Sale is initiated with a customer order; shipping documents and invoice accompany the sale, which is recorded both in a transaction file (sales) and summarized in a customer master file (or in a database)
Routine reports include a sales journal and an aged accounts receivable trial balance
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
13-5
Method of recording the transaction
Can be recorded manually (rare now) Alternatively, could be entered in batches
in the computer system (groups of transactions)
If recorded one transaction at a time, is online transaction processing
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
13-6
Control differences between batch and online systems: audit trails
Batch systems: Transactions readily
traced from source transaction to general ledger posting
Totals from groups of transactions are totaled, and these totals traced
Online systems: Transactions may be
initiated and recorded without source documents (e.g. phone orders)
Document sequencing is important to track documents.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
13-7
Control differences between batch and online systems: error detection and correction
Batch systems: If one transaction is in
error, the whole batch is rejected
Error followup is required to ensure timely processing and avoid cutoff errors
Online systems: Focus is on
preventing errors Input edit processes
check for valid customer data and reasonableness
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
13-8
Control differences between batch and online systems: segregation of duties
Batch systems: Can be achieved by
separating totaling and counting from data entry
Reconciliation and error followup should be independent of data entry
Online systems: Decentralization may
result in inadequate segregation of duties
Use passwords to separate transaction entry from master file entry (e.g. update of credit limits)
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
13-9
Effect of general controls
Prior to assessing the individual transaction cycles, the auditor documents general controls that are pervasive and that affect multiple transaction cycles
If general controls are good, the auditor may be able to rely upon and test interdependent or fully automated controls
If general controls are poor, the auditor may be able to rely upon only manual controls, or may need to conduct a substantive-oriented audit
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
13-10
Methodology for designing tests of controls for sales
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
13-11
Documentation of internal controls
Internal controls need to be documented for every audit assertion for every class of transactions
The auditor focuses on key controls, or those controls that have the greatest effect for that audit assertion
These controls could be manual, automated, or interdependent
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
13-12
Tests of internal controls
Once the key controls have been identified, the auditor can decide whether the control(s) will be tested or whether tests of details will be conducted instead
Tests of internal controls will be devised for each key control that will be tested
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
13-13
Example of internal control: occurrence assertion (manual)
Key control: credit is approved before shipment takes place: The sales manager initials all sales orders over $25 to indicate approval.
Possible test of control: Examine a sample of sales orders to ensure that the sales manager’s initial is present.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
13-14
Example of internal control: occurrence assertion (automated
batch) Key control: Orders causing balances to exceed
credit limits are printed on an exception report and are not processed for shipment.
Possible test of control: Examine a selection of exception reports and ensure that: these orders exceed the credit limit and that the orders were not processed for shipment.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
13-15
Example of internal control: occurrence assertion (automated
online) Key control: Orders causing balances to exceed
credit limits are held in a separate transaction file and are not processed for shipment.
Possible test of control: Request the client to print off the day’s on-hold transaction file. View the file to ensure that all orders in the file exceed the customer’s credit limits.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
13-16
Example of internal control: occurrence assertion
(interdependent) Key control: Orders causing balances to exceed
the credit limit are printed on an exception report and must be approved by a credit manager prior to shipment by means of entering a password.
Possible test of control: Review an exception report and ensure that all sales orders there caused the customers’ credit limit to be exceeded. Discuss with the sales manager processes followed to release such held orders.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
13-17
Practice problem 13-22 (p. 412)
Practice identifying the audit assertion that goes with a particular control
How would you test the control?
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
13-18
Manual, automated and interdependent controls
From the previous examples, you can see that:– Manual controls are controls performed
entirely by people– Automated controls (batch or online) are
performed only by computerized systems– Interdependent controls rely upon computer
processes (automation) but a person must also be involved to fully perform the control
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
13-19
Frequency of testing of internal controls
Which type of controls must be tested annually?
Which type of controls could potentially be tested every three years? Under what circumstances?
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
13-20
Full testing of interdependent controls
The interdependent control has two parts:– A function performed by an automated systems– A function performed by an individual
It is only possible to rely upon the automated function if: general controls have been assessed as good
Then, both parts of the control must be tested to enable reliance upon the control
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
13-21
What if control testing yielded many errors?
The first step is to determine whether the errors (exceptions) were due to a particular circumstance or restricted to a particular time period
For example, the credit manager was on holidays, and so no one approved credit, or the person who approved credit in his/her absence made many errors
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
13-22
Practice problem 13-21 (p. 412)
Practice differentiating between what is likely an error or fraud
How would you prevent the error or fraud?
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
13-23
What if control testing yielded many errors? (cont’d)
If it turns out that the errors are systemic (i.e. throughout the period and cannot be isolated to a particular cause), then
The auditor first looks for a compensating (alternative control)
If this alternative control achieves the same purpose and is functioning correctly, then the auditor can still rely upon internal controls
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
13-24
How do we decide whether there could be a material error?
If there is no compensating control, then the auditor needs to investigate to determine whether there is potential for this weakness to result in a material error
Conduct dual-purpose or weakness investigation (detail) tests
These tests help to quantify the extent of the error
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
13-25
Results of quantifying the error
If it turns out that the results of the weakness could result in immaterial error, the weakness will be reported in a management letter, and extended tests of detail may not be required
If a material error could result, the matter needs to be reported both to management and the audit committee and the tests need to be sufficient to provide a reasonable range for the extent of the error
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
13-26
Design versus performance format of audit program
The initial audit program is organized by audit assertion, to ensure that controls are assessed (and possibly tested) for each assertion
It is then organized into a performance format to maximum efficiency (e.g. all tests for the shipping document would be grouped)
The use of automated working paper software facilitates this process
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
13-27
Computer-assisted audit tests
Where there are a large number of transactions, it is effective for auditors to use computer-assisted audit tests
For example, in internal controls testing, the auditor could use automated sampling routines to access the client sales transaction file and select an attribute sample of sales transactions, printing details of the transactions
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
13-28
Practice problem 13-24 (p. 413)
Look at the sampling process for sales
How are results evaluated?
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
13-29
Suitability of test data
Batch systems: Test data may be inappropriate, as the transactions would be processed by the accounting system. Only transactions that will be rejected could be used.
Online systems: Test data is useful to verify the accurate functioning of online input edit controls (e.g. rejection of invalid customer numbers)
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
13-30
Suitability of generalized audit software
Best suited for analytical review, tests of detail, or dual-purpose tests, for example:– Adding up the sales transactions to sum to the
sales for the day, month or year– Reperformance of tax calculations– Examination of customer master file to
determine if any balances exceed their credit limit