coquimbo educational slides earthquacke 2015

Upload: pebaez

Post on 04-Jul-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/15/2019 Coquimbo Educational Slides Earthquacke 2015

    1/18

  • 8/15/2019 Coquimbo Educational Slides Earthquacke 2015

    2/18

    Seismotectonics

    The September 16, 2015 M 8.3earthquake occurred ~ 7 kmoffshore of Central Chile, as aresult of thrust faulting on theinterface between the Nazcaand South America plates. Atthe latitude of this event, theNazca plate is moving towardsthe east-northeast at a velocity

    of 74 mm/yr with respect toSouth America, and begins itssubduction beneath thecontinent at the Peru-ChileTrench, 85 km to the west ofthe September 16 earthquake.The size, location, depth (~26km) and mechanism of thisevent are all consistent withits occurrence on themegathrust interface in thisregion.

          C      h      i      l    e

          A    r    g    e    n     t      i    n    a

                         P                e                r                u

               -                     C                     h                      i                     l

                    e                      T

                    r                e                n               c

                         h

  • 8/15/2019 Coquimbo Educational Slides Earthquacke 2015

    3/18

    Slip (m)

    0

    4

    8

    12

    16

    20

    EQs, 1900-present

    EQs, 1971

    EQs, 1985

    EQs, 2010

    EQs, 09-2015

    1922

    1943

    1971

    2010

    1985

    2015

     A Century of LargeEarthquakes in Central Chile

    Chile has a long history of massiveearthquakes, including the 2010 M8.8 Maule earthquake in CentralChile, which ruptured a ~400 km longsection of the plate boundary south ofthis 2015 event (and to the south of

    the Juan Fernandez Ridge, whichenters the trench immediately southof the 2015 earthquake). Over thecentury prior to the September 16,2015 earthquake, the region within400 km of this event has hosted 15

    other M 7+ earthquakes including theM 8.0 and M 7.5 1985 Valparaisoearthquakes. This subduction zonealso hosted the largest earthquake onrecord, the 1960 M 9.5 earthquake insouthern Chile.

     J u a n  F e r n a n

     d e z  R i dg  e

  • 8/15/2019 Coquimbo Educational Slides Earthquacke 2015

    4/18

    −80

    −70

    −60

    −50

    −40

    −30

    −20

    −10

    0

    0 1

    −78˚ −76˚ −74˚ −72˚ −70˚ −68˚ −66˚ −64˚

    −38˚

    −36˚

    −34˚

    −32˚

    −30˚

    −28˚

    −26˚

    −24˚

    100 km

    −160

    −80

    0−80 −40 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 600 640 680

    Nazca - South

     America Plate

    Interface

    The 2015 Coquimboearthquake occurred onthe plate interface between the Nazca andSouth America Plates.Rupture occurred nearthe Peru-Chile trench,the surface expressionof the plate boundary.

    The mainshockhypocenter is inagreement with the Slab

    1.0 modeled plateinterface (blue line). Thered line (top) shows aschematic of the plate boundary which bettercaptures the flat slabnature of subduction in

    this region.

    Nazca Plate South America Plate

     A   A'

     A' A 

    Mainshock

    hypocenter 

    Slab 1.0

       D   e   p   t   h   (   k   m   )

       D   e   p   t   h   (   k   m   )

    No. Earthquakes

  • 8/15/2019 Coquimbo Educational Slides Earthquacke 2015

    5/18

    Earthquake Twitter Detection (@USGSTed)

    Twitter detectionissued to NEIC in ~45sec after origin time

    Initial instrumentalearthquake location in99 sec

    Collected 85,000"earthquake" tweets(“terremoto” or“temblor”) in the firsthour

    Large ratio of“terremoto” to“temblor” tweetsquickly indicated alarge earthquake

  • 8/15/2019 Coquimbo Educational Slides Earthquacke 2015

    6/18

    Earthquake Notification

    https://twitter.com/USGSted 

    http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/feed/v1.0/ http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/map/ 

    Updated

     Alert

    10 Minutes Later 

    https://twitter.com/USGStedhttp://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/feed/v1.0/http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/map/http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/map/http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/feed/v1.0/https://twitter.com/USGSted

  • 8/15/2019 Coquimbo Educational Slides Earthquacke 2015

    7/18

    ShakeMap Intensity 

    DYFI = circle; Instruments = triangles

    Instrumental

    Did You Feel It? (DYFI)

  • 8/15/2019 Coquimbo Educational Slides Earthquacke 2015

    8/18

    Did You

    Feel It?(DYFI)

    75˚W 70˚W 65˚W

    35˚S 35˚S

    30˚S 30˚S

    OFFSHORE COQUIMBO, CHILEUSGS Community Internet Intensity Map

    Sep 16 2015 06:54:33 PM local 31.5695S 71.6543W M8.3 Depth: 25 km ID:us20003k7a

    Processed: Sat Sep 19 00:10:05 2015

    Santiago

    Cord

    Mendoza

    Tucuman

    San Juan

    Santiago d

    Talcahuano

    Rancagua

    Talca

    Catamarca

    Rio Cu

    Los angeles

    Coquimbo

    La Rioja

    Copiapo

    Mercedes

    Santa

    Ovalle

    Linares

    Vallenar

    Chimbarongo

    1147 responses in 17 ZIP codes and 111 cities (Max CDI = IX)

    CITY SIZE

    2M+

    100,000+10,000+ 1000 Responses

    • Largest nearbyreported intensity ofIX

    • Moderate shaking(V) reported inSantiago

    Metropolitan Area 

  • 8/15/2019 Coquimbo Educational Slides Earthquacke 2015

    9/18

    M 8.3, OFFSHORE COQUIMBO, CHILEOrigin Time: Wed 2015-09-16 22:54:33 UTC (19:54:33 local)

    Location: 31.57oS 71.65

    oW Depth: 25 km

    PAGERVersion 8

    Estimated Fatalities Estimated Economic Losses

    Created: 23 hours, 17 minutes after earthquake

    Estimated Population Exposed to Earthquake ShakingESTIMATED POPULATION

    EXPOSURE (k = x1000)- -* - -* 595k* 6,455k* 3,052k* 794k 126k 0 0

    ESTIMATED MODIFIEDMERCALLI INTENSITY

    PERCEIVED SHAKING Not felt Weak Light Moderate Strong Very Strong Severe Violent Extreme

    POTENTIALDAMAGE

    ResistantStructures

    VulnerableStructures

    none

    none

    none

    none

    none

    none

    V. Light

    Light

    Light

    Moderate

    Moderate

    Moderate/Heavy

    Moderate/Heavy

    Heavy

    Heavy

    V. Heavy

    V. Heavy

    V. Heavy

    *Estimated exposure only includes population within the map area.

    Population Exposure population per ~1 sq. km from Landscan

    Orange alert level for economic losses.Significant damage is likely and the disaster ispotentially widespread. Estimated economiclosses are less than 1% of GDP of Chile. Pastevents with this alert level have required aregional or national level response.

    Yellow alert level for shaking-related fatalities.

    Some casualties are possible.

    Structures:Overall, the population in this region resides

    in structures that are resistant to earthquakeshaking, though some vulnerable structuresexist. The predominant vulnerable buildingtypes are low-rise reinforced/confinedmasonry and adobe block construction.

    Historical Earthquakes (with MMI levels):

    Date

    (UTC)

    Dist.

    (km)

    Mag. Max

    MMI(#)

    Shaking

    Deaths

    1973-10-05 168 6.7 VIII(2k) 0

    1997-10-15 90 7.1 VIII(3k) 7

    1985-03-03 174 7.9 VII(7,023k) 177

    Recent earthquakes in this area have causedsecondary hazards such as tsunamis,landslides, and liquefaction that might havecontributed to losses.

    PAGER content is automatically generated, and only considers losses due to structural damage.Limitations of input data, shaking estimates, and loss models may add uncertainty.

    http://earthquake.usgs.gov/pager

    FOR TSUNAMI INFORMATION, SEE: tsunami.gov

    Event ID: us20003k7a

    Selected City Exposurefrom GeoNames.org

    MMI City Population

    VIII Illapel 23k

    VIII Ovalle 77k

    VII Monte Patria 14k

    VII Salamanca 13k

    VII La Serena 155k

    VII Vicuna 13k

    V Santiago 4,837k

    V Vina del Mar 295k

    V Valparaiso 282k

    V Puente Alto 510k

    V Mendoza 877kbold cities appear on map (k = x1000)

    Prompt Assessment of

    Global Earthquakes for

    Response (PAGER)

    • Median loss estimation:- 60 fatalities- $650M economic

    loss

    • Chilean Red Cross reported13 fatalities

    •  AIR Worldwide estimatesinsured losses at $600-$900M

    • La Oficina Nacional de

    Emergencia del Ministeriodel Interior y SeguridadPública (ONEMI) reportedmore than 400 residential buildings were destroyedand 700 residential buildings sustained majordamage

  • 8/15/2019 Coquimbo Educational Slides Earthquacke 2015

    10/18−74˚ −72˚ −70˚ −68

    −34˚

    −32˚

    −30˚

    −28˚

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

    Slip (m)

    Finite Fault Model (FFM)

    • M 8.3 mainshock on 9-16-2015•   46 km W of Illapel, Chile•   229 km NNW of Santiago, Chile

    • Rupture initiated on the subductionzone interface at a depth of about 26km and ruptured mostly up dip towardthe Peru-Chile trench

    • Slip of >6 m occurred on the shallow

    portion of the interface near the Peru-Chile trench

    • Source duration of ~140 sec

    Nazca Plate

                      P             e             r             u 

            -                 C                  h                  i                  l

                 e                   T

                 r             e             n             c                  h 

    South America Plate

    Illapel

     Valparaiso

    Santiago

  • 8/15/2019 Coquimbo Educational Slides Earthquacke 2015

    11/18

    Single Source

     W-Phase Analysis

    • Preferred single source W-phase solution consists of aMw 8.3 thrust faulting event

    • The size, location, depth andmechanism of this event areall consistent with itsoccurrence on the

    megathrust interface

    • Two distinct pulses in themoment rate functionindicate unmodeledcomplexity in the single

    source solution!" $%&

    '()*+,-. *-/( .(0123 4&5

    61078.9+1*-,)3 4&5

    :(;*/

    φ ? &4&δ = 19λ = 83

     

    Pulse 2

    Pulse 1

  • 8/15/2019 Coquimbo Educational Slides Earthquacke 2015

    12/18

     

    837%-@-=0 #A 837%-@-=0 !A

     

    B: CD!

    E-=0/6?F 0?G- F-*+>A !";H+*I%F3/+0?6=A !";

    5-,01A J"D$ 4G

    φ K L$"D'δ = 20.3λ = 106.2

    B: MD!

    E-=0/6?F 0?G- F-*+>A $!;H+*I%F3/+0?6=A J$DCJ'M;

    5-,01A !LD$ 4G

    φ K L$CD'Nδ = 22.9ºλ = 87.5º

    !"#$%&'(#%$) O1- 0?G- F-*+> +=F 1+*I%F3/+0?6= 6I 01- I?/;0 ;37%-@-=0 P-/-

    I?Q-F +0 !" ;-9D RG+091?=S 01- G6G-=0 /+0- I3=90?6=T +=F 01- F?, 6I 01- I?/;0;37%-@-=0 P+; I?Q-F +0 !"DLND

    Multiple Source

     W-Phase Analysis

    • Complex ruptureinvolving 2 distinctpulses of moment release

    • Initial M 7.2 rupture at adepth of about ~40 kmoccurred in the 1st 20+ s

    • Followed by ~80+ s ofM 8+ up-dip megathrustrupture

  • 8/15/2019 Coquimbo Educational Slides Earthquacke 2015

    13/18

    −73˚ −72˚ −71˚

    −33˚

    −32˚

    −31˚

    −30˚

    −74˚ −72˚ −70˚ −68˚

    −34˚

    −32˚

    −30˚

    −28˚

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

    Slip (m)

    0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100Earthqauke Depth (km)

    Multiple

    Event

     Aftershock

    Relocations

    • Depthsconstrained from waveformmodeling(Wphase, RMT,etc.) whenpossible (coloredcircles).

    • Mainshock andaftershocksrelocate ~5-10 km

     W-NW of the singleevent locations

    • Seismicity largelyabsent in FFM’sregion of largestslip

    Relocated Aftershocks compared to FFM Relocation Vectors

  • 8/15/2019 Coquimbo Educational Slides Earthquacke 2015

    14/18

    !74˚   !73˚   !72˚   !71˚   !70˚   !69˚

    !34˚

    !33˚

    !32˚

    !31˚

    !30˚

    !29˚

    !28˚

    !0.10   !0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10

    !CFS (MPa)

    Coulomb Stress Change

    From Mainshock 

    Predicted Coulomb stress changefrom finite fault model

    • Coulomb stress change is a measureof how much a fault is brought closerto (red) or farther from (blue) failing

    • Background colors show Coulombstress change resolved on thesubduction plate boundary

    • Coulomb stress change is alsoresolved onto earthquake fault

    planes at their relocatedhypocenters; these events areplotted and colored by the Coulombstress change

  • 8/15/2019 Coquimbo Educational Slides Earthquacke 2015

    15/18

    !74˚   !73˚   !72˚   !71˚   !70˚   !69˚

    !34˚

    !33˚

    !32˚

    !31˚

    !30˚

    !29˚

    !28˚

    2   m 

    4  m 

    6      m    

    TOLO 

    PEDR 

    CMBA

    LVIL

    Observed

    Predicted50 cm 

    CSN StationsPredicted vs

    Observed Horizontal

    GPS Displacements• Predicted horizontal displacement

    from teleseismic finite fault model

    • Red arrows indicate predictedhorizontal displacement from finite

    fault model

    • Black arrows indicate horizontaldisplacements observed at GPSstations

    Data Source:University of Chilehttp://www.csn.uchile.cl/desplazamientos-del-terremoto-de-illapel-2015/

  • 8/15/2019 Coquimbo Educational Slides Earthquacke 2015

    16/18

    Observed InSAR vs Predicted from Teleseismic FFM

    InSAR uses satellite images to measure

    ground displacement

    Observed Predicted

    D t C dit

  • 8/15/2019 Coquimbo Educational Slides Earthquacke 2015

    17/18

    Geodetic Fault Slip Model Data Credit: Advance Rapid Imaging

    and Analysis (ARIA)Center for Natural

    Hazards, NASA

    University of MissouriUniversity of Chile

  • 8/15/2019 Coquimbo Educational Slides Earthquacke 2015

    18/18

    −76˚ −74˚ −72˚ −70˚

    −36˚

    −32˚

    −28˚

    Slip (m)

    0

    4

    8

    12

    16

    20

    EQs, 1900-present

    EQs, 1971

    EQs, 1985

    EQs, 2010

    EQs, 09-2015

    1922

    1943

    1971

    2010

    1985

    2015

    Summary Mw 8.3 earthquake is on a shallow anglethrust fault within the subduction zoneplate boundary between the Nazca and

    South America plates

    Rupture initiated at a depth of about 26 km withlargest rupture (> 6 m) occurring up dip (west),toward the Peru-Chile trench

     Aftershocks are primarily in regions adjacent to thearea of maximum earthquake slip and down dip (east)of the main fault rupture

    The Mw 8.3 earthquake occurred within the rupturezone of the 1943 M8.1 earthquake and into thepossible rupture zone of the 1971 M 7.8 earthquake to

    the south. It is adjacent to the 1922 M8.5 and 1985M8.0 rupture zones, to the north and south,respectively

    The South American subduction zone hosts asignificant number of large earthquakes that provide

    details on strain accumulation and release during theearthquake cycle