coquimbo educational slides earthquacke 2015
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/15/2019 Coquimbo Educational Slides Earthquacke 2015
1/18
-
8/15/2019 Coquimbo Educational Slides Earthquacke 2015
2/18
Seismotectonics
The September 16, 2015 M 8.3earthquake occurred ~ 7 kmoffshore of Central Chile, as aresult of thrust faulting on theinterface between the Nazcaand South America plates. Atthe latitude of this event, theNazca plate is moving towardsthe east-northeast at a velocity
of 74 mm/yr with respect toSouth America, and begins itssubduction beneath thecontinent at the Peru-ChileTrench, 85 km to the west ofthe September 16 earthquake.The size, location, depth (~26km) and mechanism of thisevent are all consistent withits occurrence on themegathrust interface in thisregion.
C h i l e
A r g e n t i n a
P e r u
- C h i l
e T
r e n c
h
-
8/15/2019 Coquimbo Educational Slides Earthquacke 2015
3/18
Slip (m)
0
4
8
12
16
20
EQs, 1900-present
EQs, 1971
EQs, 1985
EQs, 2010
EQs, 09-2015
1922
1943
1971
2010
1985
2015
A Century of LargeEarthquakes in Central Chile
Chile has a long history of massiveearthquakes, including the 2010 M8.8 Maule earthquake in CentralChile, which ruptured a ~400 km longsection of the plate boundary south ofthis 2015 event (and to the south of
the Juan Fernandez Ridge, whichenters the trench immediately southof the 2015 earthquake). Over thecentury prior to the September 16,2015 earthquake, the region within400 km of this event has hosted 15
other M 7+ earthquakes including theM 8.0 and M 7.5 1985 Valparaisoearthquakes. This subduction zonealso hosted the largest earthquake onrecord, the 1960 M 9.5 earthquake insouthern Chile.
J u a n F e r n a n
d e z R i dg e
-
8/15/2019 Coquimbo Educational Slides Earthquacke 2015
4/18
−80
−70
−60
−50
−40
−30
−20
−10
0
0 1
−78˚ −76˚ −74˚ −72˚ −70˚ −68˚ −66˚ −64˚
−38˚
−36˚
−34˚
−32˚
−30˚
−28˚
−26˚
−24˚
100 km
−160
−80
0−80 −40 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 600 640 680
Nazca - South
America Plate
Interface
The 2015 Coquimboearthquake occurred onthe plate interface between the Nazca andSouth America Plates.Rupture occurred nearthe Peru-Chile trench,the surface expressionof the plate boundary.
The mainshockhypocenter is inagreement with the Slab
1.0 modeled plateinterface (blue line). Thered line (top) shows aschematic of the plate boundary which bettercaptures the flat slabnature of subduction in
this region.
Nazca Plate South America Plate
A A'
A' A
Mainshock
hypocenter
Slab 1.0
D e p t h ( k m )
D e p t h ( k m )
No. Earthquakes
-
8/15/2019 Coquimbo Educational Slides Earthquacke 2015
5/18
Earthquake Twitter Detection (@USGSTed)
Twitter detectionissued to NEIC in ~45sec after origin time
Initial instrumentalearthquake location in99 sec
Collected 85,000"earthquake" tweets(“terremoto” or“temblor”) in the firsthour
Large ratio of“terremoto” to“temblor” tweetsquickly indicated alarge earthquake
-
8/15/2019 Coquimbo Educational Slides Earthquacke 2015
6/18
Earthquake Notification
https://twitter.com/USGSted
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/feed/v1.0/ http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/map/
Updated
Alert
10 Minutes Later
https://twitter.com/USGStedhttp://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/feed/v1.0/http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/map/http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/map/http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/feed/v1.0/https://twitter.com/USGSted
-
8/15/2019 Coquimbo Educational Slides Earthquacke 2015
7/18
ShakeMap Intensity
DYFI = circle; Instruments = triangles
Instrumental
Did You Feel It? (DYFI)
-
8/15/2019 Coquimbo Educational Slides Earthquacke 2015
8/18
Did You
Feel It?(DYFI)
75˚W 70˚W 65˚W
35˚S 35˚S
30˚S 30˚S
OFFSHORE COQUIMBO, CHILEUSGS Community Internet Intensity Map
Sep 16 2015 06:54:33 PM local 31.5695S 71.6543W M8.3 Depth: 25 km ID:us20003k7a
Processed: Sat Sep 19 00:10:05 2015
Santiago
Cord
Mendoza
Tucuman
San Juan
Santiago d
Talcahuano
Rancagua
Talca
Catamarca
Rio Cu
Los angeles
Coquimbo
La Rioja
Copiapo
Mercedes
Santa
Ovalle
Linares
Vallenar
Chimbarongo
1147 responses in 17 ZIP codes and 111 cities (Max CDI = IX)
CITY SIZE
2M+
100,000+10,000+ 1000 Responses
• Largest nearbyreported intensity ofIX
• Moderate shaking(V) reported inSantiago
Metropolitan Area
-
8/15/2019 Coquimbo Educational Slides Earthquacke 2015
9/18
M 8.3, OFFSHORE COQUIMBO, CHILEOrigin Time: Wed 2015-09-16 22:54:33 UTC (19:54:33 local)
Location: 31.57oS 71.65
oW Depth: 25 km
PAGERVersion 8
Estimated Fatalities Estimated Economic Losses
Created: 23 hours, 17 minutes after earthquake
Estimated Population Exposed to Earthquake ShakingESTIMATED POPULATION
EXPOSURE (k = x1000)- -* - -* 595k* 6,455k* 3,052k* 794k 126k 0 0
ESTIMATED MODIFIEDMERCALLI INTENSITY
PERCEIVED SHAKING Not felt Weak Light Moderate Strong Very Strong Severe Violent Extreme
POTENTIALDAMAGE
ResistantStructures
VulnerableStructures
none
none
none
none
none
none
V. Light
Light
Light
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate/Heavy
Moderate/Heavy
Heavy
Heavy
V. Heavy
V. Heavy
V. Heavy
*Estimated exposure only includes population within the map area.
Population Exposure population per ~1 sq. km from Landscan
Orange alert level for economic losses.Significant damage is likely and the disaster ispotentially widespread. Estimated economiclosses are less than 1% of GDP of Chile. Pastevents with this alert level have required aregional or national level response.
Yellow alert level for shaking-related fatalities.
Some casualties are possible.
Structures:Overall, the population in this region resides
in structures that are resistant to earthquakeshaking, though some vulnerable structuresexist. The predominant vulnerable buildingtypes are low-rise reinforced/confinedmasonry and adobe block construction.
Historical Earthquakes (with MMI levels):
Date
(UTC)
Dist.
(km)
Mag. Max
MMI(#)
Shaking
Deaths
1973-10-05 168 6.7 VIII(2k) 0
1997-10-15 90 7.1 VIII(3k) 7
1985-03-03 174 7.9 VII(7,023k) 177
Recent earthquakes in this area have causedsecondary hazards such as tsunamis,landslides, and liquefaction that might havecontributed to losses.
PAGER content is automatically generated, and only considers losses due to structural damage.Limitations of input data, shaking estimates, and loss models may add uncertainty.
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/pager
FOR TSUNAMI INFORMATION, SEE: tsunami.gov
Event ID: us20003k7a
Selected City Exposurefrom GeoNames.org
MMI City Population
VIII Illapel 23k
VIII Ovalle 77k
VII Monte Patria 14k
VII Salamanca 13k
VII La Serena 155k
VII Vicuna 13k
V Santiago 4,837k
V Vina del Mar 295k
V Valparaiso 282k
V Puente Alto 510k
V Mendoza 877kbold cities appear on map (k = x1000)
Prompt Assessment of
Global Earthquakes for
Response (PAGER)
• Median loss estimation:- 60 fatalities- $650M economic
loss
• Chilean Red Cross reported13 fatalities
• AIR Worldwide estimatesinsured losses at $600-$900M
• La Oficina Nacional de
Emergencia del Ministeriodel Interior y SeguridadPública (ONEMI) reportedmore than 400 residential buildings were destroyedand 700 residential buildings sustained majordamage
-
8/15/2019 Coquimbo Educational Slides Earthquacke 2015
10/18−74˚ −72˚ −70˚ −68
−34˚
−32˚
−30˚
−28˚
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Slip (m)
Finite Fault Model (FFM)
• M 8.3 mainshock on 9-16-2015• 46 km W of Illapel, Chile• 229 km NNW of Santiago, Chile
• Rupture initiated on the subductionzone interface at a depth of about 26km and ruptured mostly up dip towardthe Peru-Chile trench
• Slip of >6 m occurred on the shallow
portion of the interface near the Peru-Chile trench
• Source duration of ~140 sec
Nazca Plate
P e r u
- C h i l
e T
r e n c h
South America Plate
Illapel
Valparaiso
Santiago
-
8/15/2019 Coquimbo Educational Slides Earthquacke 2015
11/18
Single Source
W-Phase Analysis
• Preferred single source W-phase solution consists of aMw 8.3 thrust faulting event
• The size, location, depth andmechanism of this event areall consistent with itsoccurrence on the
megathrust interface
• Two distinct pulses in themoment rate functionindicate unmodeledcomplexity in the single
source solution!" $%&
'()*+,-. *-/( .(0123 4&5
61078.9+1*-,)3 4&5
:(;*/
φ ? &4&δ = 19λ = 83
Pulse 2
Pulse 1
-
8/15/2019 Coquimbo Educational Slides Earthquacke 2015
12/18
837%-@-=0 #A 837%-@-=0 !A
B: CD!
E-=0/6?F 0?G- F-*+>A !";H+*I%F3/+0?6=A !";
5-,01A J"D$ 4G
φ K L$"D'δ = 20.3λ = 106.2
B: MD!
E-=0/6?F 0?G- F-*+>A $!;H+*I%F3/+0?6=A J$DCJ'M;
5-,01A !LD$ 4G
φ K L$CD'Nδ = 22.9ºλ = 87.5º
!"#$%&'(#%$) O1- 0?G- F-*+> +=F 1+*I%F3/+0?6= 6I 01- I?/;0 ;37%-@-=0 P-/-
I?Q-F +0 !" ;-9D RG+091?=S 01- G6G-=0 /+0- I3=90?6=T +=F 01- F?, 6I 01- I?/;0;37%-@-=0 P+; I?Q-F +0 !"DLND
Multiple Source
W-Phase Analysis
• Complex ruptureinvolving 2 distinctpulses of moment release
• Initial M 7.2 rupture at adepth of about ~40 kmoccurred in the 1st 20+ s
• Followed by ~80+ s ofM 8+ up-dip megathrustrupture
-
8/15/2019 Coquimbo Educational Slides Earthquacke 2015
13/18
−73˚ −72˚ −71˚
−33˚
−32˚
−31˚
−30˚
−74˚ −72˚ −70˚ −68˚
−34˚
−32˚
−30˚
−28˚
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Slip (m)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100Earthqauke Depth (km)
Multiple
Event
Aftershock
Relocations
• Depthsconstrained from waveformmodeling(Wphase, RMT,etc.) whenpossible (coloredcircles).
• Mainshock andaftershocksrelocate ~5-10 km
W-NW of the singleevent locations
• Seismicity largelyabsent in FFM’sregion of largestslip
Relocated Aftershocks compared to FFM Relocation Vectors
-
8/15/2019 Coquimbo Educational Slides Earthquacke 2015
14/18
!74˚ !73˚ !72˚ !71˚ !70˚ !69˚
!34˚
!33˚
!32˚
!31˚
!30˚
!29˚
!28˚
!0.10 !0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10
!CFS (MPa)
Coulomb Stress Change
From Mainshock
•
Predicted Coulomb stress changefrom finite fault model
• Coulomb stress change is a measureof how much a fault is brought closerto (red) or farther from (blue) failing
• Background colors show Coulombstress change resolved on thesubduction plate boundary
• Coulomb stress change is alsoresolved onto earthquake fault
planes at their relocatedhypocenters; these events areplotted and colored by the Coulombstress change
-
8/15/2019 Coquimbo Educational Slides Earthquacke 2015
15/18
!74˚ !73˚ !72˚ !71˚ !70˚ !69˚
!34˚
!33˚
!32˚
!31˚
!30˚
!29˚
!28˚
2 m
4 m
6 m
TOLO
PEDR
CMBA
LVIL
Observed
Predicted50 cm
CSN StationsPredicted vs
Observed Horizontal
GPS Displacements• Predicted horizontal displacement
from teleseismic finite fault model
• Red arrows indicate predictedhorizontal displacement from finite
fault model
• Black arrows indicate horizontaldisplacements observed at GPSstations
Data Source:University of Chilehttp://www.csn.uchile.cl/desplazamientos-del-terremoto-de-illapel-2015/
-
8/15/2019 Coquimbo Educational Slides Earthquacke 2015
16/18
Observed InSAR vs Predicted from Teleseismic FFM
InSAR uses satellite images to measure
ground displacement
Observed Predicted
D t C dit
-
8/15/2019 Coquimbo Educational Slides Earthquacke 2015
17/18
Geodetic Fault Slip Model Data Credit: Advance Rapid Imaging
and Analysis (ARIA)Center for Natural
Hazards, NASA
University of MissouriUniversity of Chile
-
8/15/2019 Coquimbo Educational Slides Earthquacke 2015
18/18
−76˚ −74˚ −72˚ −70˚
−36˚
−32˚
−28˚
Slip (m)
0
4
8
12
16
20
EQs, 1900-present
EQs, 1971
EQs, 1985
EQs, 2010
EQs, 09-2015
1922
1943
1971
2010
1985
2015
Summary Mw 8.3 earthquake is on a shallow anglethrust fault within the subduction zoneplate boundary between the Nazca and
South America plates
Rupture initiated at a depth of about 26 km withlargest rupture (> 6 m) occurring up dip (west),toward the Peru-Chile trench
Aftershocks are primarily in regions adjacent to thearea of maximum earthquake slip and down dip (east)of the main fault rupture
The Mw 8.3 earthquake occurred within the rupturezone of the 1943 M8.1 earthquake and into thepossible rupture zone of the 1971 M 7.8 earthquake to
the south. It is adjacent to the 1922 M8.5 and 1985M8.0 rupture zones, to the north and south,respectively
The South American subduction zone hosts asignificant number of large earthquakes that provide
details on strain accumulation and release during theearthquake cycle