core indicators, reports, negotiated performance targets, and perkins funds regional workshops
DESCRIPTION
Carl D Perkins (Perkins IV) Career and Technical Education Act. Core Indicators, Reports, Negotiated Performance Targets, and Perkins Funds Regional Workshops. Chuck Wiseley Spring 2008. Agenda. Why are we here – why do we care? Perkins IV Legislative requirements - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Click to edit Master title style
1
Core Indicators, Reports,Negotiated Performance Targets,
and Perkins FundsRegional Workshops
Carl D Perkins (Perkins IV)Career and Technical Education Act
Chuck Wiseley
Spring 2008
Click to edit Master title style
2Regional Workshops
Agenda
• Why are we here – why do we care?
• Perkins IV– Legislative requirements
• State & Local requirements• Negotiating & Meeting Targets
– Not meeting targets & targeting funds
• Perkins funds - improving student success.
– Core Indicators, Reports, Performance Targets • Setting Targets & Perkins IV Local Application.
Click to edit Master title style
3Regional Workshops
Session 1 Goals
• Perkins funds - improving student success.
• What are the Rules?
• Negotiating & Meeting Targets– Tools for analysis– Not meeting targets & targeting funds
Click to edit Master title style
4Regional Workshops
Session 2 Goals & Objectives
• Update on development– Core Indicators, Reports, Performance Targets &
Perkins IV Local Application.Participants will:• View/Review Perkins IV Indicators & Reports
– what meaning can be derived– changing performance with Perkins funds
• Discuss and Set Proposed Targets – negotiated targets (who & when)– strategies for negotiating targets.– strategies for program improvement,– strategies for getting buy-in– Other necessary topics for inclusion
Click to edit Master title style
5
2004 Crystal Ball
• 109th Congress
• Some changes in Accountability– Strengthened
– Common measures• Wage gain
– Negotiated performance State & Local
Click to edit Master title style
6
Perkins IV
• Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Improvement Act of 2006
• P.L. 109-270• August 12, 2006.• 2007-8 Transition Year• 2008-9 First Year under the Act
Regional Workshops
Click to edit Master title style
7
Negotiating Targets
• Perkins III– State negotiates targets USDE
• Perkins IV– State negotiates targets USDE
• Targets for 1 year and then 2 years (3rd & 5th)
– Locals either:• Accept those targets
• Negotiate local targets
– Included in Local Plans• Targets for next year
Regional Workshops
Click to edit Master title style
8
Sanctions in Law
• Perkins III– State
• Bundled – WIA & ESEA• Improvement plan• Two years below, Secretary MAY withhold funds
• Perkins IV– State & Locals:
• 90% of Perkins Targets• Improvement Plan• Year 2 no improvement, <90% for 3 years for any
single target– Feds or State SHALL provide technical assistance– MAY withhold funds (all or part)
Regional Workshops
Click to edit Master title style
9
CCC Sanction Plan:Meeting Performance Targets
• Application is Improvement Plan• Accountability Determination
– In compliance – at or above 90%• Expenditures need not be linked to the areas with the largest
performance gaps
– Focused Improvement Status - < 90%• Focused Improvement section • Year 2 – No Improvement: Diagnostic Study• Programs funded must address individual program performance gaps.
– Priority Focused Improvement – 3rd Yr < 90%• Diagnostic Study and Action Plan
Regional Workshops
Click to edit Master title style
10
Priority Focused Improvement
• Focused Improvement section
• Diagnostic Study
• Action Plan– Expected outcomes, – the Perkins and other funding dedicated to each
strategy, and – the implementation dates expected for each
strategy. Regional Workshops
Click to edit Master title style
11
Odds of being in:
• Focused Improvement? – Depends on how well the negotiation goes.
• Improving after Focused Improvement?– Depends on last year.
• Priority Focused Improvement? – Depends on how well the negotiation goes. – Unlikely to occur?
Regional Workshops
Click to edit Master title style
12
The Negotiation Process
• Negotiation Workbook
– Online
– Tables
– Charts
• Negotiation Worksheet
• Local Application
Click to edit Master title style
13Regional Workshops
Negotiation Tables
Mention Office 2003 v 2007
Problem? 90% x 55.6% = 50%
What has occurred?Outcomes & Diagnostics
Faupl
Click to edit Master title style
17
Local Application: District
Click to edit Master title style
19Regional Workshops
Perkins IV funds
• Improving student success.– Nine Requirements– 18 Permissive Uses – Should address performance gaps
• Perkins IV Local Application.– Improvement Plans– Negotiating & Meeting Targets– Progressive Oversight, Improvement Plans, and
Risk Monitoring
Click to edit Master title style
20
With or Without Sanctions
Basic criteria for expending Perkins funds
• Expenditures must– Meet the purpose of the Act
– Be necessary and reasonable
• Expenditures may not be used for– General purposes
– Maintenance of existing programs
Click to edit Master title style
21
What federal rules apply?
• Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act (Perkins IV)
• EDGAR (Education Department General Administration Regulations)
Click to edit Master title style
22
What federal rules apply? (Continued)
• OMB Circulars (Office of Management and Budget)– Circular A-87 Cost Principals – State and Local
– Circular A-21 Cost Principals – Education Institutions
– Circular A-133 Single Audit Requirements
– Circular A-102 Grants and Cooperative Agreements with State and Local Governments
– Circular A-110 Uniform Administration Requirements for Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals and Other Non-Profit Organizations
Click to edit Master title style
23
What types of costs are generally considered eligible?
• Administrative Costs (5%)• Personnel Services (time records)• Operating Expenses • Stipends• Consultants• Instructional Materials• Travel• Instructional Equipment
Click to edit Master title style
24
What costs are NOT eligible?
1. Student expenses or direct assistance to students *
2. College tuition, fees, books*
3. Entertainment
4. Awards and memorabilia
5. Individual memberships
6. Membership with orgs. that lobby
7. Fines and penalties
8. Insurance/self-insurance
9. Expenses that supplant10. Audits except single audit11. Contributions and donations12. Contingencies13. Facilities and furniture *14. General advertising15. Alcohol16. Fund raising17. General administration
Click to edit Master title style
25
What are the 9 requirements for Perkins IV expenditures?
1. Strengthen academic & technical skills of students
2. Link secondary and postsecondary CTE programs (at least one program of study)
3. Provide students with strong experience and understanding all aspects of an industry (WBL)
4. Develop, improve, & expand use of technology
5. Professional development
6. Evaluate programs with emphasis in meeting needs of spec. pops.
7. Initiate, improve, expand and modernize quality programs
8. Provide services & activities of sufficient, size, scope and quality
9. Provide activities to prepare special pops. for high skill, high wage, or high demand occupations leading to self-sufficiency.
Funds made available to eligible recipients under this part shall be used to support career and technical education programs that-
Click to edit Master title style
26
20 permissive uses of funds:
1. Involve parents, business and labor in planning & operation
2. Career guidance & academic counseling
3. Business Partnerships - Work-related experience students & faculty
4. Programs for spec. pops.
5. CTE student organizations
6. Mentoring & support services
7. Upgrading equipment
8. Teacher prep. programs
9. Improving and developing new CTE courses including distance ed.
10. assist transition to BA degree programs
11. support entrepreneurship education
12. initiatives for secondary students obtaining postsecondary credit to count towards an AA/AS or BA/BS degree
13. support small CTE learning communities
14. Family & consumer sciences
15. Adult CTE programs
16. Job placement programs
17. Support Nontraditional activities
18. Automotive technologies
19. *Pooling funds –Teacher prep,
data & accountability,
assessments
20. Support other CTE programs
Regional Workshops
Click to edit Master title style
27
Effects of not achieving targets
• Above 90% of targets:– Freedom to fund any program improvements– Encouraged to address low performance
• Below 90% - year 1– Focused Improvement section
• Requires some analysis to write the narrative
– Must address low performance in funded Programs– Encouraged to start a diagnostic study
Regional Workshops
Click to edit Master title style
28
Effects of not achieving targets
continued...
• Below 90% - year 2 or no improvement– Focused Improvement section– Diagnostic study– Propose Effective Practice solutions
• Probably a more district level approach to expenditures
Regional Workshops
Click to edit Master title style
29
Effects of not achieving targets
continued...
• Below 90% of target - 3 years– Focused Improvement section– Submit Diagnostic study w Action Plan to CO– Action Plan
• Proposed Effective Practice solutions & Implementation dates
• Probably an even more district level approach to expenditures
– Risk MonitoringRegional Workshops
Click to edit Master title style
30
Break time
• I am the messenger – don’t kill the messenger
• Questions
• 20 minute break
Regional Workshops
Click to edit Master title style
31
Data: Why?
• Funding
• Outcomes Analysis
• Telling the story
Regional Workshops
Click to edit Master title style
32Regional Workshops
Defining the Data
• SAM Codes• TOP Codes• Data Elements• Core Indicators
– “The Law”– Definitions– Negotiated Performance Targets– Measurement Approaches/Formulas
Funding
Click to edit Master title style
33Regional Workshops
Student Accountability Model (SAM) & Taxonomy of Programs (TOP)
• Priority “A“ - Apprenticeship – Must have the approval of the Division of Apprenticeship
Standards
• Priority “B“ – Advanced Vocational– Used sparingly, no more than two courses in any one
program– “B” level courses must have a “C” prerequisite in the same
program area
• Priority "C" – Clearly Occupational– Generally taken in the middle stage of a program, detracts
"drop-ins."
Click to edit Master title style
34Regional Workshops
Student Accountability Model (SAM) & Taxonomy of Programs (TOP), Continued
• Priority "D" – Possibly Occupational– Taken by students in the beginning stages of their
occupational programs– Can be survey course
• Priority “E” = Non-Occupational
Vocational Flag on TOP code– Designed to identify vocational “Programs” for federal
reporting (*) - see Taxonomy of Programs, Sixth Edition, July 2007
Click to edit Master title style
35Regional Workshops
Data ElementsMIS System
• Students, Courses, Degrees, Services
• Student VTEA Data Elements– Economically Disadvantaged– Single Parent– Displaced Homemaker– Cooperative Work Experience Education– Tech Prep– Migrant Worker
Click to edit Master title style
36Regional Workshops
Accountability Requirements Section 113(b)
5 core indicators of performance:1. Student attainment of technical skill proficiencies;
2. Student attainment of credential, certificate, or degree;
3. Student retention in postsecondary education or transfer;
4. Student placement in military, apprenticeship, or employment
5. Student participation/completion of non-traditional training
• State and Local adjusted levels of performance
– Levels of performance negotiated with USDE / State
• Results reported annually
Click to edit Master title style
37
Perkins III (1998)Core Indicators
1. Skill AttainmentStudent Achievement – Successful course completion
• Academic• Vocational and Technical
2. Completions Student program completion – Certificates & Degrees
3. Placement and (3b) Retention Placement and retention in employment
4. Equity -- Non-Traditional Employment Participation/Completion of non-traditional training
• 4a - Participation• 4b Completion
Regional Workshops
Click to edit Master title style
38
Core Indicators
1. Technical Skill AttainmentSuccessful CTE course completion
2. Completions
Program completion–Certificate, Degree & Transfer Ready
3. Persistence & TransferStudent persistence in Higher Ed
4. Placement Placement in apprenticeship, employment, military, fed gov
5. Equity -- Non-Traditional Employment Participation (5a)/Completion (5b) - non-traditional training
Regional Workshops
Click to edit Master title style
39Regional Workshops
Cohort Definitions Used for Measurement
Participant: NT Participation
– Perkins III -Any enrollment in a CTE course (TOP)
– Perkins IV – concentrator using assigned major
Concentrator: All other indicators
• Cohort of students enrolled during the cohort year and
– Successfully completed at least one course in the middle or end of a program (SAM A-C) and 12 vocational units within a single discipline (two digit TOP) or
– Program completion as indicated by receipt of ANY vocational credit certificate or degree
Leavers: Not enrolled in year following cohort year
– 2P1 - Completions
– 4P1 - Placement (Employment)
Click to edit Master title style
40Regional Workshops
Assigning a Program to a Student
1. Award –TOP code of CTE Certificate or Degree
2. Concentrators
• Hierarchy based on SAM Priority code
• Assigned to the TOP where most CTE units occurred
Click to edit Master title style
41
What is not decided
Regional Workshops
• Concentrator– How long to accumulate 12 units in a two digit TOP (discipline)
• Two, three, or five years
• Completions – Transfer Ready or Prepared
• Employment – Which period for “employed”?
• Feds want quarter 2 - Oct-Dec • Any of 4 quarter
• NT Participation• CRCC
Click to edit Master title style
42
Negotiating Targets
• Perkins III– State negotiates targets USDE
• Perkins IV– State negotiates targets USDE
• Targets for 1 year and then 2 years (3rd & 5th)
– Locals either:• Accept those targets• Negotiate local targets
– Included in Local Plans• Targets for next year • Negotiations complete by May 15
Regional Workshops
Click to edit Master title style
43
Sanctions in Law
• Perkins III– State – Bundled with WIA, ESEA, Adult Ed
• Improvement plan• Two years below, Secretary MAY withhold funds
• Perkins IV– State – Perkins – each indicator
• 90% of Target• 3 years for any single target
– Locals:• 90% of Targets• Improvement Plan• Year 2 no improvement, 3 years <90% for any single target
– State SHALL provide technical assistance– State MAY withhold funds (all or part)
Regional Workshops
Click to edit Master title style
44
CCC Sanction Plan:Meeting Performance Targets
• Application is Improvement Plan
• Accountability Determination
– In compliance – at or above 90%
– Focused Improvement Status - < 90%
• Focused Improvement section
• Year 2 – No Improvement: Diagnostic Study
– Priority Focused Improvement – 3rd Yr < 90%
• Diagnostic Study and Action Plan
Regional Workshops
Click to edit Master title style
45
Timeline for Outcomes & Outputs
• Negotiating Performance 2008-09– Spring 2008
• Cohort Year (2006-07)• +1 yr for outcomes (2007-08)
– Transfer– Persistence– Employment– Spring 2009
• Outcomes have already occurred– Target low performance now!
Click to edit Master title style
46
Local Application: District
Regional Workshops
Click to edit Master title style
47
Spring 2008 Sessions
7 Regional Sessions for District/College Teams– Content so far from this session
• TOP & SAM Codes• Data Elements• Core Indicators• “The Law”
– Definitions & Negotiated Performance Levels– CCC Strategies
– CI Measurement Approaches/Formulas/Targets – Reports
• Negotiation – Strategies• Compliance – Local App• Program Improvement
Regional Workshops
Click to edit Master title style
48
Core Indicators & Targets
1. Technical Skill AttainmentSuccessful CTE course completion
2. Completions
Program completion–Certificate, Degree & Transfer ready
3. Persistence & TransferStudent persistence in Higher Ed
4. Placement Placement in apprenticeship, employment, military, fed gov
5. Equity -- Non-Traditional Employment Participation (5a)/Completion (5b) - non-traditional training
Regional Workshops
Click to edit Master title style
49Regional Workshops
Core Indicator 1Technical Skill Attainment
• Successful Course Completions – Technical Skill Proficiencies
• Vocational (CTE) Courses– SAM A-C
– Vocational TOP
• G.P.A. Concentrators– Grade reports (moved to Data Mart)
Click to edit Master title style
50
Core Indicator 1: Measurement &Performance Levels
SAM A - C Courses: # Students with GPA > 2.00
÷# Students with Grades A - F
Year Target Actual*2002-03 77.76% 84.01%2003-04 78.76% 84.73%2004-05 79.76% 84.70%2005-06 84.02% 83.69%2006-07 83.70% ??.??%
99.6%
* Based on Perkins III data.Regional Workshops
Click to edit Master title style
51Regional Workshops
Core Indicator 1: Measurement &Performance Levels (Analysis)
SAM A - C Courses:
# Grades A-C & Cr
÷
# Grades A–F, Cr-NoCr, W, & I
Click to edit Master title style
52Regional Workshops
Core Indicator 2Program Completions
• Completers (numerator)– Award in Current Year
– AA/AS degrees– Certificates
– Transfer Ready (or Prepared)– or Equivalent
• Leavers & Completers (denominator)– Left system (college) for one year and/or– Award in Current Year
– AA/AS degrees– Certificates– Transfer Ready
Click to edit Master title style
53
CI 2-Completions: Measurement & Performance Levels
Certificate/Degree/Transfer Ready÷
All Concentrators (Leavers & Completers)
Year Target Actual*2002-03 59.82% 76.36%2003-04 59.82% 74.89%2004-05 60.82% 73.42%2005-06 73.00% 73.73%2006-07 73.00% ??.??%
* Based on prior indicator definition.Regional Workshops
Click to edit Master title style
54Regional Workshops
Core Indicator 3 Persistence & Transfer
Concentrators who were not leavers in the year following the cohort year
Or
Transfers (CSU/UC/Clearinghouse)
÷
All Concentrators
Click to edit Master title style
55Regional Workshops
Core Indicator 4 Placement
• Placement• UI wage file match 1st year out
• Apprenticeship, Military, Fed Gov
• Minus Continuing in Four Year Institution – CSU, UC, Clearinghouse
• Not resolved• Four quarters in Academic Yr after leaving
• Quarter 2
Click to edit Master title style
56
CI 4 Placement : Measurement & Performance Levels
Leavers & Completers in UI covered employment or
Apprenticeship, Military, Fed Gov÷
All Leavers & CompletersYear Target Actual*2002-03 83.19% 84.08%2003-04 83.19% 82.53%2004-05 83.19% 82.07%2005-06 82.07% 81.76%
98.65%
99.62%
*Based on prior indicator definition.Regional Workshops
Click to edit Master title style
57
Core Indicator 5Gender Equity
Training leading to Nontraditional Employment
(e.g., Men in Nursing – Women in Auto)
75% / 25% from 2000 census employment data
• Job codes (SOC) mapped to 2000 Census data
• SOC codes mapped to CIP (USDE)
• NAPE developed Nontraditional CIP table
• CIP codes mapped to TOP (CCC)Regional Workshops
Click to edit Master title style
58Regional Workshops
Core Indicator 5Gender Equity
In Programs leading to Nontraditional Employment
Nontraditional Gender Students
÷
All Students in NT Program
Click to edit Master title style
59Regional Workshops
CI 5a: Participation Measurement & Performance Levels
Nontraditional participants enrolled in a nontraditional TOP Code
÷All participants enrolled in a
nontraditional TOP Code
Year Target Actual2002-03 27.98% 36.98%2003-04 28.98% 36.80%2004-05 29.98% 35.31%2005-06 35.31% 37.16%
Click to edit Master title style
60Regional Workshops
Nontraditional “completers” of nontraditional programs
÷All “completers” of nontraditional programs
CI 5b Completion: Measurement & Performance Levels
Year Target Actual2002-03 26.95% 24.42%2003-04 26.95% 24.21%2004-05 25.05% 23.25%2005-06 23.25% 25.66%
Click to edit Master title style
61
Nontraditional “completers” of nontraditional programs
÷All “completers” of nontraditional programs
CI 5b Completion: Measurement & Performance Levels
Year Target Actual2002-03 26.95% 24.42%2003-04 26.95% 24.21%2004-05 25.05% 23.25%2005-06 23.25% 25.66%
90.6%89.8%92.8%
Regional Workshops
Click to edit Master title style
62Regional Workshops
Do these indicators really measure what education in CCC does?
Click to edit Master title style
63Regional Workshops
Do these indicators really measure what education in CCC does?
They are only indicators.
Click to edit Master title style
64Regional Workshops
Are they meaningless?
Click to edit Master title style
65Regional Workshops
Are they meaningless?
No. Student success matters.
Click to edit Master title style
66Regional Workshops
How can we use the indicators to improve student success?
Click to edit Master title style
67Regional Workshops
How can we use the indicators to improve student success?
Understand “What” is happening to students.
Click to edit Master title style
68Regional Workshops
How can we use the indicators to improve student success?
Understand “What” is happening to students.
Why is it happening?
SLOs, CATs, Research, etc.
Click to edit Master title style
69
How important is setting an appropriate target ?
Regional Workshops
Click to edit Master title style
70Regional Workshops
Accessing the Data
• Access• Report Formats• Report Structures• Report Contents• Report Examples
Click to edit Master title style
71Regional Workshops
Reports
• New reports– Developed for negotiations
• District and College Level• Special Pops detail • 8 years history• Final version mid February 2008
• All Reports– Easier access – Excel or SQL reports– ??? Late February 2008 ???
• Progressive scrutiny on use of reports– Below 90% of Targets in
Click to edit Master title style
72Regional Workshops
Access
• http://www.cccco.edu• Important Documentation
– Quick Reference
– Negotiation Report Instructions
– System Documentation
– System Requirements• No more Installing plug-in
• No Administrative rights requirements
Click to edit Master title style
73Regional Workshops
Report Formats
• Print Version – For administrators, faculty, students & PIOs
• Printing from the WWW• Local Applications and Final Reports• For exporting to
– word processor– spreadsheet
• Data Download Version – For Researchers, IS & Technophiles
• CSV For Export to:– Excel
» SPSS, SAS or other Stat Package» BRIO» Access or other database software
Click to edit Master title style
74Regional Workshops
Data Download
Click to edit Master title style
75
Negotiation Workbooks
• Instructions
• Counts
• Percentages
• Charts– Rates– Counts
• Data work tables
Click to edit Master title style
76Regional Workshops
Negotiation Tables
Click to edit Master title style
77Regional Workshops
Negotiation Charts
3P1 - Rates
80.99%
79.15%
83.32%84.07% 84.18% 84.60% 84.90%
84.08%
82.53% 82.07%81.14%
91.4%92.1% 92.7%
93.6% 94.0%94.8% 95.0% 94.6%
93.3% 93.2%93.8%
70.00%
75.00%
80.00%
85.00%
90.00%
95.00%
100.00%
1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-1 2001-2 2002-3 2003-4 2004-5 2005-6est
Grand Total
Female
Male
Non-traditional
Economically Disadvantaged
CA Empl Rate
Est
California Employment Rate (source: BLS)
2P1 - Counts
50,50744,245
70,296 69,356 68,890 69,700
62,140 60,37664,125
68,33772,572
32,438 30,963
39,790 41,990 40,881 42,10045,166 46,101 48,028 50,172 52,296
88,22793,319 92,159
96,833
104,203 106,925
114,362118,405 117,427 119,035
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
Program Year
Total
Success
All CCC Awards
Est SP
Total 50,507 44,245 70,296 69,356 68,890 69,700 62,140 60,376 64,125 68,337 72,572
Success 32,438 30,963 39,790 41,990 40,881 42,100 45,166 46,101 48,028 50,172 52,296
All CCC Awards 88,227 93,319 92,159 96,833 104,203 106,925 114,362 118,405 117,427 119,035
Est SP 23,991 25,362 34,210 36,598 36,090 36,483 38,287 38,394 40,004 43,589 46,604
1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-1 2001-2 2002-3 2003-4 2004-52005-6
est
Es
Es
fees increase Sp 2003from $11 - $18
fees increaseFall 2004from $18 - $26
Although CCs are helping more people succeed (including special population students), the numbers of students leaving the system without a certificate or degree is increasing at a higher rate.
Fee increases seemed to have the impact starting in 2002-3 academic year.
CA hits 6.6% high unemp rate Jan 04
Regional Workshops
Click to edit Master title style
79Regional Workshops
Report Structures
• Negotiation Workbooks• Forms
• Perkins IC - Local Application • Perkins IC - Final Report
• Summaries– All five Indicators on one page
• Answer Sheet Style
• Detailed – Percents and counts – Detailed breakouts for each Indicator component
Click to edit Master title style
80Regional Workshops
CI Report Contents
• CI Reports
– State, District, College
– 2-4-6 digit TOP
– Special Populations breakouts
– Identified on each report• Performance below negotiated levels
– Performance below is highlighted
– Low numbers (denominator < 10)• Blue-italics
Click to edit Master title style
81Regional Workshops
CI Contents (continued)
1. Summary• College, District & State• Identifying Low Performance & Low Numbers• Comparing Performance across Programs
2. Detailed• Program Area (6 digit TOP) • Three Year Trends• Identifying Low Performance areas• Comparing Performance within Programs
Click to edit Master title style
82Regional Workshops
Report Examples
• Final Report Form • College by TOP Form • Summary – College
– Summary - 5 digit TOP
• Summary – Detail • Core 2 – Completions
– Core 2 - 5 digit TOP
• Course Voc Status/SAM Code
Click to edit Master title style
83Regional Workshops
Negotiation Report Contents
• District, College?
• Special Populations breakouts
• Numerators, Denominators, & Rates
• Charts for analysis
College Local App -Final Report Form
Regional Workshops
Dist Local App - Final Report Form
Regional Workshops
Final Report Form
Regional Workshops
College by TOP Form
Regional Workshops
Summary - College
Regional Workshops
Summary – College 5 Digit
Regional Workshops
Summary - Detail
Regional Workshops
Core 2 - Completions
Regional Workshops
Core 2 - Completions 5 digit
Regional Workshops
Course Voc Status/SAM Code
Regional Workshops
Click to edit Master title style
94Regional Workshops
Using the Data
• Negotiate or accept state-adjusted levels – Trends over time for your college
– By program, special population, Tech Prep
• Workshops, Committees & Faculty Information– Circulate to faculty for their use & input
• Factor in allocation decision-making for Local Plans– Supplement MIS data with
your own knowledge and follow-up of students
Click to edit Master title style
95Regional Workshops
Practice using the Data
Negotiation Exercise:• Review FAUPL Worksheet• Walk through common scenarios• Review the pre-printed report for a sample
college• Conduct a guided practice using first
indicators• Negotiate or Accept State Targets
Click to edit Master title style
96
Faupl
Click to edit Master title style
97
Negotiation Workbook
Click to edit Master title style
98
Discussion
• Improving Session Content:– Order – Negotiations earlier or later– Detail– Strengthen funding ties or are sanction threats
sufficient?– Other?– Resources: JSPAC, IWITTS, NAPE
Chuck Wiseley, [email protected], 916.327.5895
Regional Workshops