coronary heart desease
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/13/2019 Coronary Heart Desease
1/8december 8/vol19/no13/2004 nursing standard 47
By reading this article and writing a practice profile, you can gain
a certificate of learning. You have up to a year to send in yourpractice profile. Guidelines on how to write and submit a
profile are featured at the end of this article.
Coronary heart disease:
risk factor managementNS271 Foxton J et al (2004) Coronary heart disease: risk factor management.Nursing Standard. 19, 13, 47-54. Date of acceptance: November 9 2004.
AuthorJulie Foxton RGN, RM, is sen-ior nurse adviser, HEART UK,Maidenhead, Berkshire;Michaela Nuttall RN, DipN,MSc, is CHD Co-ordinator,Bromley Primary Care Trust,Kent; and Jillian Riley RGN,RM, BA(Hons), MSc, is headof postgraduate educationfor nurses and allied healthprofessionals, Royal
Brompton Hospital, andhonorary lecturer, ImperialCollege, London.Email: [email protected]
SummaryCoronary heart disease is theleading cause of mortalityand morbidity in the UK.Nurses have a pivotal role inthe management of high-riskpatients and the modificationof risk factors.
Key words Cardiovascular system and
disorders Health promotion
These key words are basedon subject headings from theBritish Nursing Index. Thisarticle has been subject todouble-blind review.
In brief
For related articles visit ouronline archive at:
www.nursing-standard.co.ukand search using the key
words above.
Online archive
The aim of this article is to provide an overview of
coronary heart disease (CHD) risk factors and their
management. After reading this article you should
be able to:
Explain the rationale behind the treatment targets
to reduce the incidence of CHD in the population. Describe the risk factors for CHD.
Use the coronary risk calculator to identify people
at high risk of developing CHD.
Identify those who are at moderate risk of CHD.
Discuss the role of lifestyle advice in the manage-
ment of cholesterol.
Describe the drug therapy that may be used to
reduce cholesterol.
CHD is the leading cause of mortality and morbid-ity in the UK and the single most common cause
of premature death. Despite a fall in CHD mortal-
ity in recent years, the UK death rate is among the
highest in the world at around 120,000 per year
(British Heart Foundation (BHF) 2003). CHD, together
with cancer and stroke, accounts for 35 per cent
of life years lost before the age of 75 (BHF 2003).
In addition, more than 1.5 million people in the UK
are living with angina and 500,000 have heart fail-
ure (Department of Health (DoH) 2004) frequently,
although not exclusively, caused by CHD. This high
incidence is not unique to the UK and a similar
pattern is being observed worldwide (Yusuf et al
2002). The World Health Organization (WHO) has
predicted that by 2020, CHD will be the greatest
cause of death and disability throughout the world
(Tunstall-Pedoe et al1999). The increasing number
of people living with the disease is of concern to
healthcare professionals. Strategies to prevent this
are therefore of great importance.
The National Service Framework (NSF) for CHD
(DoH 2000a) laid the foundations for dramatic
improvements in the prevention and treatment of
heart disease, and 1.8 million people are now receiv-
ing lipid-lowering drugs, with lifestyle advice a keyfeature of primary and secondary prevention appoint-
ments. However, there is room for improvement
and the NHS Improvement Plan (DoH 2004) sets
an ambitious target to reduce death rates from
CHD and stroke in the under-75s by at least 40 per
cent by 2010.
CHD can develop at any age. Initially, an area of
atheromatous plaque forms in the coronary artery.
The mechanism for plaque formation is unclear,although the predominant view is that lipid accu-
mulates under the lining of the coronary artery
(Samar 1999). Because the lipid infiltrate is a for-
eign matter, white blood cells called macrophages
engulf it, and create foam cells (Samar 1999).
Smooth muscle cells then invade the area, which
enlarges. It is not until the plaque obstructs more
than 50 per cent of the lumen of the coronary artery
that the flow of blood to the heart muscle, the
myocardium, is reduced. This usually means that
when resting, or undertaking minimal activity, the
blood supply to the heart is adequate. However,
when the heart requires a greater supply of oxy-
gen, as occurs during exercise or emotional episodes,
the blood supply cannot increase sufficiently and
the person will experience chest discomfort. This is
referred to as angina pectoris. Once plaque has
Pathophysiology
Incidence and prevalence
Aim and intended learning outcomes
Coronary heart disease:risk factor management
pages 47-54
Multiple choice questionsand submission instructionspage 55
Practice profile assessmentguide page 56
C ONT I NUI NG PROFESS I ONAL DEVELOPM ENT
This article has been supported by an
educational grant from:
-
8/13/2019 Coronary Heart Desease
2/848 nursing standard december 8/vol19/no13/2004
formed, the wall of the coronary artery is damaged
and irregular in shape and platelets cluster around
the obstruction. This reduces the size of the lumen
still further and consequently the blood supply is
also reduced. Sometimes platelet aggregation can
be sudden causing an abrupt and total occlusion
of the coronary artery. At this time the person willexperience a myocardial infarction (MI).
A number of factors are thought to increase the
likelihood of developing CHD. The three major
risk factors are smoking, hypertension and abnor-
mal cholesterol levels. However, additional risk
factors include a family history of CHD, diabetes,
abdominal obesity, lack of fruit and vegetables in
the diet and lack of exercise (Yusuf et al2004).
These risk factors are common, regardless of sex,
ethnic group or age and are frequently not found
in isolation, thereby increasing the risk (Yusuf et
al2004). Some risk factors are modifiable, for
example, cholesterol, diabetes, hypertension, obe-
sity, physical inactivity and smoking, and efforts
should be made to increase awareness of how to
reduce the likelihood of developing CHD both in
the person who has identified risk factors and in
the population as a whole (Yusuf et al2004).
Modification of risk factors There are a number
of ways in which the risk of developing CHD canbe modified. They include lifestyle advice as well
as the prescription of advice regarding medication.
Abnormal cholesterol levels are a major risk factor
for CHD and are responsible for at least 46 per cent
of all new cases of CHD (BHF 2004). Consequently,
efforts are being made to lower cholesterol levels
in the population to a target level of 5.0 mmol/l or
less for total cholesterol. This may seem hard to
achieve certainly among some sections of the
patient population and in some areas of the coun-
try, for example, where patient concordance with
therapy is poor, there is an inability to tolerate ther-
apy or where sections of the community are unable
or unwilling to access medical services but the
most recent British Hypertension Society guidelines
go further and suggest a total cholesterol of less
than 4.0mmol/l and low-density lipoprotein (LDL)
level of less than 2.0mmol/l (Williams et al2004).
The risk of developing CHD can be calculated
using a risk chart. This forecasts the risk of devel-
oping CHD over the next ten years. High risk is iden-
tified where the risk is calculated as 30 per cent or
higher, whereas moderate risk is calculated as a 10
per cent risk of developing CHD over the next tenyears (Wood et al1998).
The role of the nurse has extended to meet the
changes in health care where increasingly the
emphasis is on health promotion and disease pre-
vention. This is outlined in the documents Making
a Difference (DoH 1999a), the NHS Plan (DoH
2000b), and Shifting the Balance of Power in the
NHS: Securing Delivery(DoH 2001). Government
policies to improve the health of the individual andthe population have emphasised that nurses have
a significant contribution to make. The nursing
profession can assist the shift in responsibility for
health to patients by empowering people to improve
their health outcomes.
Diabetes and obesity are also increasing in the
UK (BHF 2003). The nurses role is pivotal in help-
ing to address this increase. Nurses can proactively
implement preventive strategies and advise on
many aspects of health promotion. They are increas-
ingly using clinical guidelines to ensure a higher
quality of care (Puffer and Rashidian 2004). Thismeans that while nurses are ideally placed to pro-
vide information, the advice given can be more
consistent and evidence-based through the appli-
cation of local and national guidelines. This also
helps to improve equity of care.
In CHD the proactive role of the nurse has been
further reinforced by the publication of the NSF for
CHD (DoH 2000a), which suggests that the ideal
way to implement secondary prevention is through
nurse-led clinics. While nurses in almost all areas
of care have the opportunity to assess and advise
on CHD risk factors, it is particularly pertinent for
nurses working in primary care and the commu-
nity. This is because many people who have CHD
or who are at a high or moderate risk of develop-
ing the disease are cared for in primary care set-
tings. For those people with CHD, there is now
The nurses role
Risk factors
Health promotion
TIME OUT 1Write down, in no more than one
paragraph, your own definition of CHD.
TIME OUT 2Using a separate piece of paper for each
risk factor identified above, write downwhat you are currently doing to reduce
that risk factor either in your own life orin a patients life. Once you have done
this, compare your answers with thesuggestions below.
TIME OUT 3Look at the risk calculator on the
following websites:www.hyp.ac.uk/bhs/Cardiovascular_Risk_Charts_and_Calculators.htm
Consider a patient you have cared forover the past week, who does not
already have a diagnosis of CHD, anduse the calculator to assess his or her
risk of developing CHD over the next
ten years. You may need to read thepatients notes to find some of
the details.
-
8/13/2019 Coronary Heart Desease
3/8december 8/vol19/no13/2004 nursing standard 49
evidence of benefits from four randomised controlled
trials of nurse-led secondary prevention (Allen et al
2002, Cupples and McKnight 1999, Moher et al
2001, Murchie et al 2003). Three of the trials were
in primary care in the UK and one in secondary care
in the United States (US). These show that nurse-
led secondary prevention clinics can improve sec-ondary prevention of CHD risk factors. Wright et
al (2001) also found that nurse-led risk factor man-
agement is acceptable to patients.
There is less evidence that nurse intervention is
effective for those people who are at high or mod-
erate risk of developing CHD but have not been
diagnosed with CHD. The Cochrane Library reviewed
multiple risk-factor interventions for primary pre-
vention of CHD and concluded that effective inter-
ventions on a general population basis would be
mostly ineffective and costly (Ebrahim and Davey
Smith 1999). Therefore, targeting health promo-
tion activities at high-risk individuals should be con-
sidered the first step. Targeted CHD prevention is
also advocated by the joint British recommenda-
tions on CHD prevention (Wood et al 1998). Lifestyle
and pharmacological interventions and goals for
those people at high risk of CHD are similar to those
for people with CHD.
Weight loss There is a twofold increase in the risk
of developing CHD in people who are obese or
overweight. For those who are obese, CHD is the
main cause of excess mortality (British Nutrition
Foundation (BNF) 1999). This is in part because
obese or overweight individuals are more likely to
have hypertension, diabetes and high triglycerideand cholesterol levels, and other abnormalities of
clotting that increase the risk of thrombus forma-
tion or MI (Meade et al1993).
Weight control is important and can be achieved
in a variety of ways. Eating less fat, sugar and alco-
hol is helpful but, to achieve a healthy body weight,
it is also important to incorporate regular, moder-
ate exercise into a daily routine. Various benefits
are associated with weight loss (Box 1).
In people with a body mass index (BMI) greater
than 25kg/m2 (calculated by dividing weight in kilos
by height in metres squared), referral to a dietician
or nutritionist should be considered. Strategies
should be considered that gradually reduce weight
by about 0.5kg per week through a combination
of diet, exercise and behavioural changes.
Reduction of waist circumference is associated
with improvements in cardiovascular risk (Han et
al 1997). Unlike BMI, which does not take into
account body fat distribution, waist measurement
can give a better indication of android obesity
(central distribution of excess adipose tissue)
(Donahue et al1987). It is recommended that weight
reduction is required when waist circumference ismore than 102cm in men and more than 88cm in
women (Lean et al1995).
Dietary advice Nurses can also advise on a healthy
diet (Figure 1) which may include the following:
Calorie intake 1,200-1,600kcal per day, mod-
erate fat intake by eating less fatty meat, fatty
cheese, full-cream milk, fried food and lard (Tang
et al1998).
Consider eating more vegetables, fruit, cereals,
wholegrain bread, poultry, fish, rice, skimmed or
semi-skimmed milk, grilled food, lean meat or
pasta.
Fried food should be discouraged, but steam fry-
ing or using a vegetable oil high in polyunsatu-
rates, such as sunflower or rapeseed oil or one
containing plant sterols or stanols could be con-
sidered (see below).
Use low-fat spreads suggest considering a
low-fat spread that contains plant stanol/sterol
esters. These and other plant stanol/sterol-
containing foods may be useful adjuncts in low-
ering cholesterol levels. Plant sterols and stanols
are sourced from either wood pulp products or
soya bean distillates, rapeseed and sunflower
oils. They inhibit the absorption of cholesterolin the intestines and may achieve total choles-
terol reductions of up to 14 per cent (Miettinen
et al 1995). They are safe and tolerable and are
contained in a variety of ready-to-buy products
ranging from milk and milk drinks, yoghurts
and spreads. However, these products should
be used as described as a constant circulating
level of stanols or sterols is required to achieve
maximum efficiency and effectiveness.
Lifestyle management
Mortality20-25 per cent fall in overall mortality
30-40 per cent fall in diabetes-related deaths40-50 per cent fall in obesity-related cancer deaths
Blood pressure10mmHg fall in diastolic and systolic pressures
DiabetesUp to a 50 per cent fall in fasting blood glucose
Reduces risk of developing diabetes by more than 50 per cent
LipidsFall of 10 per cent total cholesterol, 15 per cent low-density lipoprotein and 30 per
cent triglyceridesIncrease of 8 per cent high-density lipoprotein
(Blenkinsopp 2004)
Box 1. Benefits of 5-10kg weight loss
Health promotion
TIME OUT 4In Time Out 3 you calculated a patients
risk of developing CHD over the next tenyears. List this patients risk factors for
CHD. Under each risk factor, identifysome of the ways in which you mighthelp him or her to reduce this risk.
-
8/13/2019 Coronary Heart Desease
4/850 nursing standard december 8/vol19/no13/2004
Health promotion
BEST CHOICE IN MODERATION BEST AVOIDED
Figure 1. The HEART UK diet sheet
Reproduced with the kind permission of HEART UK
Cereals and starchy foods
Potatoes
Vegetables and fruit
Fish
Meat
Vegetarian choice
Eggs and dairy
Oils
Spreads
Meals
Cakes and biscuits
Puddings
Flavourings, sauces,jams and sweets
-
8/13/2019 Coronary Heart Desease
5/8december 8/vol19/no13/2004 nursing standard 51
Physical activity Thirty seven per cent of CHD
deaths in people under the age of 75 are attribut-
able to physical inactivity (BHF 2003). The cardio-
vascular benefits of regular physical activity include
reduced blood pressure and less likelihood of obe-
sity, both of which help to reduce the risk of devel-
oping CHD. However, the Health Survey for England1998 (DoH 1999b) identified that approximately
70 per cent of people were not taking regular phys-
ical activity. Recommended levels to gain cardio-
vascular protection, if you are physically able, are
at least 30 minutes of steady activity on five or more
days a week (American College of Sports Medicine
(ACSM) 2000). This can take the form of walking,
jogging, swimming, cycling and dancing, which
can easily be fitted into a regular day.
Smoking Smoking is the single biggest cause of
preventable death in the UK. Each year, tobacco
smoking accounts for more than 30,000 deaths
from cardiovascular disease (Callum 1998). It is
essential that nurses take a proactive role in help-
ing people to stop smoking and provide advice on
smoking cessation.
Key features of individual smoking cessation are:
Ask about smoking at every opportunity.
Advise all smokers to stop.
Assist smokers to stop.
Arrange follow-up.
Stopping smoking will reduce CHD risk even if a
person has smoked for many years. There are
short and long-term benefits. Within eight hours
nicotine levels will be reduced by half and within24-48 hours carbon monoxide levels will be com-
parable to those of a non-smoker. The long-term
benefits are considerable; excess cardiovascular
risk from smoking reduces by half within one year
and after five years reverts to about the same
level as someone who has never smoked (Critchley
and Capewell 2003).
Alcohol In moderation (one to two units daily for
women, two to three units for men), alcohol may
reduce the risk of CHD by potentially increasing
high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol slightly
and reducing thrombotic tendencies (Mukamal etal2001). A unit is defined as a half pint of beer,
lager or cider, or a pub measure of wine, sherry or
spirits. However, consuming too much alcohol
places health at risk in a number of ways. When
taken in excess, alcohol can damage the cardiac
muscle, cause arrhythmias, stroke and coagu-
lopathies (Lindsay and Gaw 2004). Additionally it
may contribute to obesity, high triglycerides and
hypertension, risk factors for the development of
CHD (Lindsay and Gaw 2004). Men should drink
no more than three to four units of alcohol and
women no more than two to three units a day.
Stress A certain amount of stress may be desir-
able as it keeps people alert and motivated.
However, as stress levels increase and especially
if prolonged, they can be counter-productive.
Stress can exacerbate symptoms in people with
pre-existing heart disease, and can contribute to
hypertension (Blenkinsopp 2004). Additionally, it
may lead to the adoption of poor eating habits,
smoking and increased alcohol consumption and
non-concordance with prescribed medication.
The nurse can help people to find time for relax-
ation or teach them simple breathing exercisesto help reduce the risk of developing CHD
(Blenkinsopp 2004).
This section examines methods used to control and
correct the lipid profile (Box 2), other than diet and
lifestyle.
Statins These are the most common form of drug
therapy for reducing raised cholesterol levels. The
first statins were produced more than 20 years ago
from fungi, but newer versions are man-made.
Statins include atorvastatin, cerivastatin (now with-
drawn), fluvastatin, lovastatin (not available in the
UK), pravastatin, rosuvastatin and simvastatin, and
others are undergoing clinical and scientific study.
Statins work by inhibiting the action of 3-hydroxy-
3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMGCoA) reduc-
tase, an enzyme which is involved in cholesterol
synthesis in the liver (BNF 2004). Statin therapy
can reduce low-density lipoprotein (LDL) choles-
terol by up to 60 per cent (McTaggart 2003).
Additionally, statins lower triglycerides (fatty acids
attached to glycerol) in proportion to their LDL-
lowering effect. Different statins vary in their effecton HDL cholesterol but they generally cause a small
rise and because HDL is cardioprotective this is a
beneficial action (Assman et al1995).
Statins have been proven to be effective at low-
ering mortality and morbidity for cardiovascular
disease (DoH 2000a, Gordon 2000, Hebert et al
1997, Minhas 2003, Shepherd et al2002, Wood
et al1998). The Simvastatin Survival Study (also
know as the 4S study) in the late 1980s was the
first trial to provide this information (Shepherd et
al1995). Trials such as this have continued over
subsequent years and prove the safety and efficacyof statins and a reduction in cardiovascular events
following statin therapy (Athyros et al2002, Downs
et al1998, Long-term Intervention with Pravastatin
in Ischaemic Disease (LIPID) Study Group 1998,
Sacks et al1996). A more recent study examined
people with type 2 diabetes who were therefore
at high risk of developing CHD. It demonstrated
Drug therapy
Health promotion
Total cholesterol
Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
High-density lipoprotein cholesterol
Triglycerides
Box 2. The lipid profile
-
8/13/2019 Coronary Heart Desease
6/852 nursing standard december 8/vol19/no13/2004
that, regardless of cholesterol level, lowering cho-
lesterol even further provides additional cardiovas-
cular benefit to the patient (Colhoun et al2004).
A recent initiative, approved by the Medicines and
Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA),
has been launched to target people at moderate
risk of CHD in the UK. This initiative aims to reducetheir risk factors, including lowering blood choles-
terol levels. Approval has been given for simvas-
tatin 10mg (one of the statin drugs) to be dispensed
by a pharmacist, following a pharmacy screening
protocol, to all men and women where the risk of
developing heart disease over the next ten years
has been estimated as 10 per cent (moderate risk)
(MHRA 2004a).
Screening is offered to all men over 55 years of
age, with no other risk factors for heart disease, to
men 45-54 years of age and women over 55 years
with one or more risk factors. These risk factors are
determined as smoking, obesity, family history of
premature death of CHD (before the age of 65 in
female relatives and age 55 in male relatives) and
people of South Asian origin (MHRA 2004a). Those
who fit the criteria are offered lifestyle advice and
a statin may be dispensed. If people do not fulfil
the pharmacy screening protocol and are not offered
the drug, they should still be offered appropriate
lifestyle advice. If on screening, someone is identi-
fied as high risk he or she should be given lifestyle
advice and encouraged to consult the GP for advice
and management, as further investigation and treat-
ment may be required.When using the pharmacy protocol, it is not essen-
tial to obtain the results of a cholesterol test before
commencing the statin. However, to track how cho-
lesterol levels are responding to the drug, which
may be important to ensure continuation of the
therapy, as well as to monitor its effectiveness, it
may be useful to recommend that a cholesterol test
is performed when therapy is started and possibly
on a yearly basis afterwards.
Statins do differ from each other in molecular
structure and each has a slightly different mode
of action. They may also have different side effects
and cerivastatin was withdrawn, due to excess
cases of rhabdomyolysis (muscle breakdown)caused by a previously unknown metabolic path-
way. The pathway through which the drugs are
metabolised is shown in Table 1, which also out-
lines variations in the reduction of total choles-
terol and LDL cholesterol.
It is thought prudent to use the appropriate statin
for the patients risk profile and in these days of try-
ing to achieve NHS targets (NHS 2004) some statin
drugs are viewed as more able to achieve those tar-
gets than others. However, some patients cannot
tolerate large doses of statins and this may influ-
ence the choice of drug prescribed. Recently, the
manufacturers of rosuvastatin advised all prescribers
to commence rosuvastatin at the starting dose of
10mg and titrate carefully, while patients requiring
doses of 40mg and above should be supervised in
specialist centres (MHRA 2004b). This advice was
given as a result of several cases of rhabdomyolysis
that had occurred at the higher dosage.
Statins are safe and generally well tolerated
(DoH 2000a, Minhas 2003, Sacks et al1996,
Shepherd et al2002). The most common side
effects are usually transient gastrointestinal dis-
turbance, liver function test disturbance of unknown
long-term significance (rare) and a spectrum ofmuscle-related side effects ranging from myalgia
(common), muscle inflammation (myositis) to
rhabdomyolysis, a potentially life-threatening
event (BNF 2004). A number of risk factors for
rhabdomyolysis have been identified: older age;
lower body weight; hypothyroidism; concomitant
therapy and other drugs, and it is therefore wise
Health promotion
Drug Dose range Maximum change (%) Lipophilic Metabolic pathwayLDL HDL TG P450 Metabolism
Atorvastatin 10-80mg 50 6 29 Yes 3A4
Fluvastatin 20-80mg 24 8 10 Yes 2C9
Lovastatin* 20-80mg 34 9 16 Yes 3A4
Pravastatin 10-40mg 34 12 24 No unknown
Rosuvastatin 10-40mg 57 10 28 No 2C9/2C19
Simvastatin 10-80mg 41 12 18 Yes 3A4
* Not available in the UK
LDL = Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL = High-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG = Triglycerides
(Reproduced with kind permission of Dr Michael Schachter, Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Imperial College, St Marys Hospital, London)
Table 1. Profile of statins
-
8/13/2019 Coronary Heart Desease
7/8december 8/vol19/no13/2004 nursing standard 53
to monitor patients in these categories more
closely (BNF 2004).
Historically, it was suggested that statin therapy
should be taken at night, when the liver synthe-
sises most of the cholesterol. However, the newer
statins (atorvastatin and rosuvastatin) have long
half-lives, remain in the bloodstream for longer andcan therefore be taken at any time of the day.
Statins are often perceived as first-line therapy
after diet and other lifestyle changes. However,
they are not the only drug available to lower cho-
lesterol. There are several other products that can
be used in combination with statins and in some
cases alone to reduce cholesterol and the corre-
sponding risk of CHD. A 10 per cent reduction in
cholesterol leads to a 30 per cent reduction in risk
of CHD (Law et al1994). Other cholesterol-low-
ering products include nicotinic acid, fibrates, resins,
omega-3 fish oils and ezetimibe.
Nicotinic acid The main effect of nicotinic acid is
to inhibit fatty acid release from fat cells in the body.
This reduces the production and levels of LDL
cholesterol to 17 per cent, while increasing levels
of HDL cholesterol up to 26 per cent (Chapman et
al2004). Doses of 2mg per day are required. One
of the major side effects of nicotinic therapy has
been the severe flushing that accompanies the start
of treatment. However, this has been addressed
and newer formulations of nicotinic therapy have
included a dose titration pack to minimise the side
effects that may be experienced (Capuzzi et al1998).
Fibrates These drugs increase the number of LDL
receptors in the liver and have a small effect on the
clearance of LDL through the liver. Their greatest
effect, however, is lowering very LDL (VLDL) and
triglycerides. Fibrates have been safely used in com-
bination with statin drugs in the past, although this
has predominantly been in specialist centres wherecareful and frequent patient monitoring can take
place (Frick et al1987, Rubins et al1999). Data are
awaited from the FIELD trial (due to report in 2005)
for more information about these drugs.
Resins When cholesterol has been made it is stored
in the bile ducts and mixed with food to aid diges-
tion. Preventing the re-absorption of bile salts will
reduce the amount of cholesterol that is mixed with
the salts being reabsorbed. Hence the small reduction
in cholesterol. However, resins are often unpalatable
they are in powder form and are mixed with fruit
juices or yoghurt and their unpleasant side effects
of flatulence, constipation and diarrhoea often mean
that patients are not keen to take them. They are,
however, licensed for use in children. Their cholesterol-
lowering ability is about 14 per cent. They should be
used with caution in patients with raised triglycerides
as they can exacerbate this problem (BNF 2004).
Omega-3 fish oils The benefits of oily fish in
reducing the risk of coronary heart disease are
well documented (Stone 1996). However, two
separate preparations of polyunsaturated fatty
acids (PUFA fish oil supplements) known as
Maxepa and Omacor are available on prescrip-
Health promotion
REFERENCES
Allen J et al(2002) Nurse case
management of
hypercholesterolemia in patients
with coronary heart disease: results
of a randomized clinical trial.
American Heart Journal. 144, 4,
678-686.
American College of Sports Medicine
(2000)ACSMs Guidelines for
Exercise Testing and Prescriptions.
Sixth edition. Philadelphia PA,
Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
Assman G et al(1995) Epidemiologicaland clinical relevance of triglycerides
and high-density cholesterol.
Cardiovascular Risk Factors. 5,
1, 4-11.
Athyros V et al (2002) Treatment with
atorvastatin to the National
Cholesterol Educational Program
Goal versus usual care in secondary
coronary heart disease prevention.
The GREek Atorvastatin and
Coronary-heart-disease Evaluation
(GREACE) study. Current Medical
Research and Opinion. 18, 4,
220-228.
Bays H et al(2001) Effectiveness and
tolerability of ezetimibe in patientswith primary hypercholesterolemia:
pooled analysis of two phase II
studies. Clinical Therapeutics. 23, 8,
1209-1230.
Blenkinsopp J (2004) Heart health:
advising customers about OTC
simvastatin. Pharmacy Magazine. 10,
8, 25-31.
British Heart Foundation (2004) BHF
Statistics Website. www.heartstats.org
(Last accessed: November 2 2004.)
British Heart Foundation (2003)
Coronary Heart Disease Statistics.
London, BHF.
British National Formulary (2004) British
National Formulary No 48. London,
British Medical Association and the
Royal Pharmaceutical Society of
Great Britain.
British Nutrition Foundation (1999)Obesity: Report of the British
Nutrition Foundation Task Force.
Oxford, Blackwell Science.
Callum C (1998) The Smoking Epidemic.
London, Health Education Authority.
Capuzzi D et al(1998) Efficacy and
safety of an extended-release
nicotinic acid (Niaspan): A long-term
study.American Journal of
Cardiology. 82, Suppl 12A, 74U-81U.
Chapman M et al (2004) Raising
high-density lipoprotein cholesterol
with reduction of cardiovascular risk:
the role of nicotinic acid. A position
paper developed by the European
Consensus Panel on HDL-C. CurrentMedical Research and Opinion. 20, 8,
1253-1268.
Colhoun H et al (2004) Primary
prevention of cardiovascular disease
with atorvastatin in type 2 diabetes
in the Collaborative Atorvastatin
Diabetes Study (CARDS): multicentre
randomised placebo-controlled trial.
Lancet. 364, 9435, 685-696.
Critchley J, Capewell S (2003) Mortality
risk reduction associated with
smoking cessation in patients with
coronary heart disease: a systematic
review.Journal of the American
Medical Association. 290, 1, 86-97.
Cupples M, McKnight A (1999)
Five-year follow up of patients at
high cardiovascular risk who took
part in randomised controlled trial
of health promotion. British MedicalJournal. 319, 7211, 687-688.
Department of Health (2004) NHS
Improvement Plan: Putting People at
the Heart of Public Services. London,
The Stationery Office.
Department of Health (2001) Shifting
the Balance of Power in the NHS:
Securing Delivery. London, The
Stationery Office.
Department of Health (2000a) National
Service Framework for Coronary
Heart Disease. London, The
Stationery Office.
Department of Health (2000b) The NHS
Plan: A Plan for Investment, A Plan
for Reform. London, The StationeryOffice.
Department of Health (1999a) Making
a Difference: Strengthening the
Nursing, Midwifery and Health
Visiting Contribution to Health and
Health Care. London, The
Stationery Office.
Department of Health (1999b) Health
Survey for England 1998. London,
The Stationery Office.
Donahue R et al(1987) Central obesity
and coronary heart disease in men.
Lancet. 1, 8537, 821-824.
Downs J et al(1998) Primary prevention
of acute coronary events with
lovastatin in men and women with
average cholesterol levels: results of
AFCAPS/TexCAPS. Air Force/Texas
Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention
Study.Journal of the AmericanMedical Association. 279, 20,
1615-1622.
Ebrahim S, Davey Smith G (1999)
Multiple risk factor interventions for
primary prevention of coronary
heart disease (Cochrane Review).
The Cochrane Database of
Systematic Reviews. Issue 2.
Chichester, John Wiley and Sons.
Frick M et al(1987) Helsinki Heart
Study: primary-prevention trial with
gemfibrozil in middle-aged men with
dyslipidemia. Safety of treatment,
changes in risk factors, incidence of
coronary heart disease. New England
Journal of Medicine. 317, 20,1237-1245.
Gordon D (2000) Cholesterol lowering
reduces mortality. In Grundy S (Ed)
Cholesterol-lowering Therapy:
Evaluation of Clinical Trial Evidence.
New York NY, Marcel Dekker.
-
8/13/2019 Coronary Heart Desease
8/854 nursing standard december 8/vol19/no13/2004
tion and can further enhance cholesterol lower-
ing. The American Heart Association scientific
statement on diet recommends that patients at
risk of cardiovascular disease would benefit from
2-4mg of omega-3 fish oils per day (Kris-Etherton
et al2002).
Ezetimibe This drug blocks the absorption ofdietary and biliary cholesterol in the intestines. It
works specifically at the brush border of the intes-
tine. It can reduce cholesterol by up to 18 per cent
(Bays et al2001). There is a current licence appli-
cation to launch a combination of ezetimibe and
simvastatin in the next few months.
CHD remains a significant cause of death and dis-
ability throughout the western world. However,
many of the risk factors for the development of
the disease are modifiable through attention to
lifestyle and diet. Additionally, newer drug thera-
pies and the use of plant stanols and sterols can
contribute to reducing blood cholesterol levels
and thereby assist in the prevention and man-
agement of CHD. While much can be done to
reduce risk factors for CHD in the community set-
ting, the nurse has an important role to play in
raising awareness of the risks of CHD and also in
assisting people to make necessary lifestyle changesto minimise these risks
Conclusion
Health promotion
Han T et al(1997) Waist circumference
reduction and cardiovascular benefits
during weight loss in women.
International Journal of Obesity and
Related Metabolic Disorders. 21, 2,
127-134.
Hebert P et al (1997) Cholesterol
lowering with statin drugs, risk ofstroke, and total mortality. An
overview of randomized trials.
Journal of the American Medical
Association. 278, 4, 313-321.
Kris-Etherton P et al(2002) Fish
consumption, fish oil, omega-3 fatty
acids, and cardiovascular disease.
Circulation. 106, 21, 2747-2757.
Law M et al(1994) By how much and
how quickly does reduction in serum
cholesterol concentration lower risk
of ischaemic heart disease? British
Medical Journal. 308, 6925,
367-372.
Lean M et al(1995) Waist
circumference as a measure for
indicating need for weight
management. British Medical
Journal. 311, 6998, 158-161.
Lindsay G, Gaw A (2004) Coronary
Heart Disease Prevention: A
Handbook for the Healthcare Team.
Second edition. London, Churchill
Livingstone.
Long-term Intervention with Pravastatin
in Ischaemic Disease (LIPID) Study
Group (1998) Prevention of
cardiovascular events and death with
pravastatin in patients with coronary
heart disease and a broad range of
initial cholesterol levels. New
England Journal of Medicine. 339,
19, 1349-1357.McTaggart F (2003) Comparative
pharmacology of rosuvastatin.
Atherosclerosis Supplements. 4, 1,
9-14.
Meade T et al(1993) Fibrinolytic activity,
clotting factors, and long-term
incidence of ischaemic heart disease
in the Northwick Park Heart Study.
Lancet. 342, 8879, 1076-1079.
Medicines and Healthcare products
Regulatory Agency (2004a) The
Reclassification of Simvastatin 10mg
(Zocor Heart-Pro) Over the Counter
(OTC). http://medicines.mhra.gov.uk/inforesources/publications/arm18
outcomeqa.pdf (Last accessed:
November 25 2004.)
Medicines and Healthcare products
Regulatory Agency (2004b) New
Prescribing Advice for the 40mg
Dose of Crestor (rosuvastatin).
http://medicines.mhra.gov.uk/
ourwork/monitorsafequalmed/
safetymessages/crestor_9604.htm
(Last accessed: November 26 2004).
Miettinen T et al(1995) Reduction of
serum cholesterol with
sitostanol-ester margarine in a mildly
hypercholesterolemic population.
New England Journal of Medicine.
333, 20, 1308-1312.
Minhas R (2003) Current progress in
lipid therapy. British Journal of
Cardiology. 10, 1, 59-68.
Moher M et al(2001) Cluster
randomised controlled trial to
compare three methods of
promoting secondary prevention of
coronary heart disease in primary
care. British Medical Journal. 322,
7298, 1338-1342.
Mukamal K et al(2001) Prior alcohol
consumption and mortality
following acute myocardial
infarction. Journal of the American
Medical Association. 285, 15,
1965-1970.Murchie P et al(2003) Secondary
prevention clinics for coronary heart
disease: four-year follow up of a
randomised controlled trial in
primary care. British Medical Journal.
326, 7380, 84.
National Health Service (2004) General
Medical Services Contract
Regulations. London, The Stationery
Office.
Puffer S, Rashidian A (2004) Practice
nurses intentions to use clinical
guidelines.Journal of Advanced
Nursing. 47, 5, 500-509.Rubins H et al(1999) Gemfibrozil for
the secondary prevention of coro-
nary heart disease in men with low
levels of high-density lipoprotein
cholesterol. Veterans Affairs Density
Lipoprotein Cholesterol Intervention
Trial Study Group. New England
Journal of Medicine. 341, 6,
410-418.
Sacks F et al(1996) The effect of
pravastatin on coronary events after
myocardial infarction in patients
with average cholesterol levels.
Cholesterol and Recurrent Events
Trial investigators. New England
Journal of Medicine. 335, 14,
1001-1009.
Samar A (1999) The pathogenesis of
atherosclerosis. In Jairath N (Ed)
Coronary Heart Disease and Risk
Factor Management: A Nursing
Perspective. Philadelphia PA, WB
Saunders.
Shepherd J et al(2002) Pravastatin in
elderly individuals at risk of vascular
disease (PROSPER): a randomised
controlled trial. Lancet. 360, 9346,
1623-1630.
Shepherd J et al(1995) Prevention of
coronary heart disease with
pravastatin in men with
hypercholesterolemia. West of
Scotland Coronary Prevention StudyGroup. New England Journal of
Medicine. 333, 20, 1301-1307.
Stone N (1996) Fish consumption, fish
oils, lipids and coronary heart
disease. Circulation. 94, 9,
2337-2340.
Tang J et al(1998) Systematic review of
dietary intervention trials to lower
blood total cholesterol in free-living
subjects. British Medical Journal.
316, 7139, 1213-1220.
Tunstall-Pedoe H et al(1999)
Contributions of trends in survival
and coronary-event rates to changesin coronary heart disease mortality:
10-year results from 37 WHO
MONICA project populations.
Monitoring trends and determinants
in cardiovascular disease. Lancet.
353, 9164, 1547-1557.
Williams B et al(2004) Guidelines for
management of hypertension:
report of the fourth working party
of the British Hypertension
Society, 2004-BHS IV.Journal of
Human Hypertension. 18, 3,
139-185.
Wood D et al(1998) Joint British
recommendations on prevention of
coronary heart disease in clinical
practice. British Cardiac Society,
British Hyperlipidaemia Association,
British Hypertension Society,
endorsed by the British Diabetic
Association. Heart. 80, Suppl 2,
S1-S29.
Wright F et al(2001) Patients and
practice nurses perceptions of
secondary preventive care for
established ishaemic heart disease:
a qualitative study.Journal of
Clinical Nursing. 10, 2, 180-188.
Yusuf S et al(2004) Effect of potentially
modifiable risk factors associated
with myocardial infarction in 52
countries (the INTERHEART study):
case-control study. Lancet. 364,9438, 937-952.
Yusuf S et al (2002) The global
epidemic of atherosclerotic
cardiovascular disease. Medical
Principles and Practice. 11,
Suppl 2, 3-8.
TIME OUT 5Return to the start of the article and look
at the learning outcomes. Reflect also onyour aims at the beginning of this article.
Write a short paragraph under each ofthe learning outcomes to indicate howyou have achieved these outcomes.
TIME OUT 6Now that you have completed the article,you might like to write a practice profile.Guidelines to help you are on page 56.