corporate governance in perspective of control in organization
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Control in organization: corporate governance perspective | 1
Corporate governance in perspective of control in organization
Shahril Budiman
Raja Haji College of Social and Political Science
Department of Government Science
Abstract
Corporate governance nowadays plays a big role into corporation or private
company. The raises number of implementation of corporate governance has been affect to
made trust among companies, shareholders, management system and involve customer to
ensure equity among them. Besides that, getting public trust through clear of regulation,
standard of work even assurance according business performance in long term also one of
many reasons how investors started thinking to join once company. Other than, profit
oriented of course is the main important thing why people join once business or became a
shareholders. When the discourse of corporate governance we will highlights into U.K and
U.S. both of these country have expert with corporate governance and formulate code of
that. In U.K and U.S wherein the failure of companies cause happened with lack of clear
financial system, minim participation of board directors make results of collapse of the
companies and impact to other such as government. Meanwhile, corporate governance in
Asia was introduce after Asian financial crisis (AFC). There are several countries such as:
Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, South Korea encounter to monetary crisis circumstances.
There are many State Owner Enterprises‟ (SOE) and private enterprise/company has had
trouble with that condition. Regarding to go out from that circumstances Malaysia for
instance has been conduct the Malaysia Code on Corporate Governance (MCCG). The
purposes MCGG is to conduct more accountability, transparency and effectiveness into
business assurance and applying the principle of good governance. In addition, when we
discuss about corporate governance we could not rule out to organization and management.
The most important of management function is control besides planning, organizing and
directing. Therefore, there is necessary in corporate governance as organization play the
role of control in organization. According to control in corporate governance there are also
create space to relation government and companies. In area of specialization how share
holders, board directors even government conduct the external and internal control into
ensure corporate governance walk away as well as possible.
Keyword: Management, control, companies, corporate governance, government, good
governance, shareholders, boards of directors.
Management of control
One part of the management function is control, as one of step to goal starting from
planning to set standard, objective and set the direction before project will be starting.
Afterward continue to leading addressing to inspire effort and controlling to ensure what
has be settling in the beginning would be same in the progress and what is out come or
Control in organization: corporate governance perspective | 2
result will achieve as well. Controlling in organization in management will encourage with
word “organizing”, this is to set the structure of organization to execute and run the
organization. Following to Schermerhorn as he said, control plays a positive and necessary
role in the management process and to have things “under control” is good; for things to be
“out of control” is generally bad (Schermerhorn:2011). In addition, Robbins also mentioned
that in control management involves monitoring activities to ensure that they being
accomplished as planned and correcting any significant deviations. Besides that, the
effectiveness of control system is determined by how self it facilitates goal achievement
(Robbins, Cenzo: 2008). One of the most important in control management in the
organization is the control process there are such as figure in bellow:
Figure I
The Control Process
Source : Robbins, Cenzo : 2003
Organization purposes is make what the plans are goes with the goals at the end. At
the same time, what has be done in the beginning will work with their action or we called
“Organization Performance”. In Corporate governance, these necessary ensure what was set
Objectives Standard
Compare actual performance with standard
Measure actual
performance
Is standard
being
attained?
Is variance
acceptable?
Is standard
acceptable?
Revise
standard
Do
Nothing
Do Nothing
Identity Cause of variation
Correct performance
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Control in organization: corporate governance perspective | 3
in the annual of year for instance, will be reach in the end of year or in the other words is
target. However, there is not easy to get the target as well following the planning because of
surely in the progress stage invariably face the problem. even in big company such Toyota.
Inc, General Motor .Inc and Ford Motor .Inc. Case in below show that giant company like
Toyota face the problem with their product.
Furthermore, in example case how Toyota have failure to control they are car in the
cases of “Toyota to recall 7.4 million vehicles over power window glitch” (Kobuta;2012).
There are some fatalities of control Toyota Motor Corp (7203.T) said it would recall more
than 7.4 million vehicles worldwide as a faulty power window switch was a potential fire
hazard, the latest in a series of setbacks that have dented the reputation of Japan's biggest
automaker. There is some fact that missing of control-out of control will affect into the
reputation as mentioned in news above and if we related with the management which
process had been missing of attention?. There is case when we are looking into the Toyota
group company was establish in 1937 and now with 668,186 shareholders and including
selling in five continents, see figure I. Thus, how they are have mistake during production
and affect to their customer? .Reflect to management system principle, they are must to
check into the process what wrong an in which step must to resolve directly even they are
sell but at the same time they can more delivered their control.
Figure II
Toyota Sales by region
Region 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
North America
1,908.9 2,031.3 2,230.3 2,436.1 2,738.3 2,822.2 2,441.8 1,975.4 1,935.5 1,806.9
Latin
America
128.8 162.1 214.9 270.5 339.4 379.4 370.2 293.6 342.1 333.5
Europe 764.8 851.5 946.9 995.2 1,124.1 1,238.6 1,119.5 886.0 785.8 801.9
Africa 139.8 160.6 206.7 227.2 265.7 313.5 288.1 201.4 197.6 211.9
Asia 493.4 682.4 846.3 1,062.9 1,106.7 1,329.6 1,438.6 1,533.9 1,895.9 1,998.2
Oceania 182.2 215.1 232.8 236.9 250.3 275.9 277.7 231.2 249.6 215.9
Middle East 220.3 251.4 270.9 325.3 404.8 482.7 590.1 482.5 532.0 527.5
Overseas total
3,838.3 4,354.5 4,948.8 5,554.1 6,229.3 6,841.9 6,526.1 5,604.0 5,961.1 5,895.9
Japan 1,680.5 1,715.9 1,758.8 1,713.1 1,692.3 1,587.3 1,470.0 1,375.5 1,566.1 1,201.0
Worldwide 5,518.8 6,070.4 6,707.6 7,267.3 7,921.6 8,429.3 7,996.1 6,979.6 7,527.3 7,096.9
Control in organization: corporate governance perspective | 4
total
(1 unit = 1,000 vehicles)
Note: Regional classifications are those of the Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc. The number of
vehicles produced includes the Toyota and Lexus brands. As a result of rounding, the numbers do not necessarily
add up to the total shown here
Source: Toyota Motor Corporation
Table in above shows the number of selling in Europe, Latin America, Africa, Asia
and Oceania. However, the number of recall because error in power window system make
public trust decrease because fatality management control of quality by Toyota. In Addition,
Toyota must fix as fast as possible if they are do not want to lose more consumer. There is
example shows how is it control play into corporation because of market will made
assessment into their products.
The importance of corporate governance
Good corporate governance is key to the integrity of corporations, financial institutions and
markets, and central to the health of our economies and their stability. Corporate
governance has become talk of the day in the corporate world, especially with when the
large scandals that befall companies in the UK and the United States in the 1980s. In the
UK in late 1980‟s following the scandals of UK listed firms such as Poly Peck and
Maxwell. Polly peck was reported that healthy profits at that time but afterward in the next
year they are declared to collapse. Following of that there was Bank of Credit and
Commerce International (BCCI) lost of billion dollars for its depositors, shareholders and
employees (Shamsul: 2009). The UK initiative to launch Cadbury Report by 1992 the aims
for Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance and sets out recommendations on the
arrangement of company boards and accounting systems to mitigate corporate governance
risks and failures. Moreover, Malin (2003) Published in the United Nations Conference On
Trade And Development, selected issues in corporate governance: regional and country
Control in organization: corporate governance perspective | 5
experiences explain there are actually many different definitions of corporate governance
but they all address the following elements:
Systems of controls within the company
Relationships between the company‟s board/shareholders/stakeholders
The company being managed in the interests of the shareholders (stakeholders)
Greater transparency and accountability to enable users of corporate information
to determine whether the business is being managed in a way that they consider
appropriate
Therefore, system of control in the company will be playing the important stage into
the organization as mentioned in above. Besides that, in corporate governance that
mentioned by Steger and Amann (2008), Corporate governance key task to establish this
accountability and create transparency in this regard for stakeholders. In the other word,
managerial definition of corporate governance namely:
“Corporate governance establish clear structures regarding accountability,
responsibility, and transparency at he head of company, And defines the role of
boards and management” (Steger, Amann: 2008).
Moreover, The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)
define that "The primary role for regulation is to shape a corporate governance environment
compatible with societal values that allows competition and market forces to work so that
corporations can succeed in generating long-term economic gain. Specific governance
structures or practices will not necessarily fit all companies at all times" (OECD 1998a).
The OECD identifies the following key elements of good corporate governance:
The rights and obligations of shareholders
Equitable treatment of shareholders
The role of stakeholders and corporate governance
Transparency, disclosure of information and audit
The board of directors
Non-executive members of the board
Executive management, compensation and performance
Each of these is discussed in more detail below.
The rights and obligations of shareholders
Control in organization: corporate governance perspective | 6
A corporate governance framework should protect shareholder rights. It should
ensure that there is one vote for one share. It should ensure that management
provides sufficient and relevant information. It should encourage shareholders to
participate in annual general meetings and vote. Shareholders should be able to
share in residual profit (dividends). Minority shareholders should be protected. It
should ensure fairness and transparency in the operations of the company.
Obligations: use voting rights.
Equitable treatment of shareholders
A corporate governance framework should ensure equitable treatment of all
shareholders, including minority and foreign shareholders;
Same voting rights (within same class of shares etc);
All shareholders of same class should be treated equally.
The role of stakeholders in corporate governance
A corporate governance framework should ensure that the rights of stakeholders are
protected by law and that these rights are respected.
It should provide effective redress for violation of rights.
It should encourage stakeholders to assume a role in the corporation that enhances
the performance of the corporation and the market;
It should provide for disclosure of information relevant to the interests of
stakeholders.
Transparency, disclosure of information and audit
A corporate governance framework should ensure the full, timely and detailed
disclosure of information on all material matters, including the company's financial
situation, performance, ownership structure and governance.
It should include the establishment of an (internal) audit committee.
Transparency/disclosure includes disclosure of information on:
Financial/operating results
Ownership structure
Members of the board of directors and management
Quantitative and qualitative matters concerning employees and
Other stakeholders in the corporation
Governance structures and policies
Corporate targets and prospects
Execution of unusual and complex transactions, transactions
Including derivative products and their level of risk
The board of directors
A corporate governance framework should ensure the strategic leadership of the
corporation, the efficient monitoring of management by the board of directors.
Accountability of board to its corporation and shareholders.
Meetings, for example one a month; process; Chair/CEO (separation of duties and
responsibilities) etc.
Non-executive members of the board
Control in organization: corporate governance perspective | 7
These members should form independent judgements, especially with respect to the
corporation‟s strategy, performance, asset management and management
appointments;
Non-executive members should be independent from executive members of board
(e.g. family members should not be admitted) and should not have a business
relationship with the corporation or any other commercial involvement that may
affect their independent judgment
Interlocking directorships should be avoided.
Executive management, compensation and performance
Management compensation should be tied to the corporation‟s general level of
profitability and overall performance.
Total compensation should be disclosed in financial statements.
Procedures for determining compensation should be disclosed.
A remuneration committee (or review committee) should be established.
Internal and external control into corporate governance
Achieving good corporate governance by control process by two approaches
namely, Internal and external control. Internal control defined as corporation should do
monitoring into their progress of work by them self. In contrary, external control defined by
performing by outside of corporate delivered their assessment. It is related to controlling
function in term of measurement and correction of performance in order to make sure that
enterprise objectives and the plans devised to attain them are accomplished (Koontz:1980).
The important thing that corporate governance have to do inside of organization is internal
monitoring whether from shareholders, board of directors, management system or by
employees. This step to ensure that overall planning will be goon as well as possible. Thus,
first step of control of corporate governance following the internal control by
standardizations establish by internal organization.
For instance, in the case of stepping up the privatisation plan by the Indonesian
Government has its critics. Privatisation frequently creates a negative impression as it can
lead to large-scale job losses, contract labour and outsourcing, thus generating public
resistant. Economists also argue that there were serious problems with the privatisation
Control in organization: corporate governance perspective | 8
process in Indonesia (Bullard, 2008). There is one of corporate governance control shall
effectively to deliver assessment for government if not probably it would dysfunction
among private and public trust.
Internal control
Nowadays, there are many country adopted corporate governance into their national
system for ensure doing business and effort from country to safe them from financial crisis.
In addition, COSO define internal control as a process not merely at the event. It is a
series of occurrences that permeate an entity‟s activities see in figure III (Keasey & Wright:
1997). On the other hand, The analyses of Fama (1980) and Fama and Jensen (1983)
suggest that various aspects of organization structure (including the board of directors)
whereby the management and the control of decisions are separated can alleviate the agency
problem. In complex organizations, diffusion of ownership among a large number of
shareholders creates the need for delegation of decision control (ratification and monitoring)
and decision management (initiation and implementation) to agents within the corporation
(Rediker, J, K and Seth, A.: 1995)
For instance, in U.K established the Cadbury Report to consider that all directors,
whether or not they have executive responsibilities, should take position and carrying out of
„the necessary controls over the activities of their companies are in place and working‟
(Code of Best Practice, 1.8, p. 58). Regarding of that statement, board directors also have to
involve to control of management even they subordinate job description (Keasey, Wright:
1997).
Communication Information
Figure III
Control in organization: corporate governance perspective | 9
External control
External corporate governance controls encompass the controls external
stakeholders exercise over the organization, see figure IV. Examples include:
Competition
Debt covenants
Demand and assessment of performance information (esp. Financial statements)
Government regulations
Managerial labour market
Media pressure
Takeovers
However, external control nowadays giving more benefit into corporate and
government and make customer even shareholders will be easy to have inform extra from
outside corporation. Nevertheless, in my opinion also we can found sometimes lack of clear
of external control by media into corporate governance and it make public trust through
media change. In spite of that, there is pro and cons and hope it would be deliver benefit
into those have been involve with corporate governance whether as shareholders, board of
director or employees to improve their productivity and performance to achieve good
governance .
The COSO Framework for internal control
Control in organization: corporate governance perspective | 10
Conclusion
Finally, control in corporate governance basically come from management and that
is in organization system management play the important role to be effective and efficient.
In addition, corporate governance emerge in the past because several fault by whom
involve in contrast not taking position into management system also lack of clear about
regulation. The role of government at this time also necessary to control the corporation
even they are SOE‟s because it will related to national financial system.
The important of control in corporate governance addressing good corporate
governance and equity principle for those may concern in corporation. In the same way,
public also could be agent of control to CG and improving to be better in the future.
Therefore, control in CG distinguish as two approach. Firstly, internal control define as
monitoring treatment conduct by inside organization. Secondly, external control define as
Figure IV: External control influences to corporate governance
Control in organization: corporate governance perspective | 11
outsiders control into CG for giving impact process and assessment what wrong and what
have to be done. Thus, what has planning through control management system will
achieving good result.
In the end, control in the company even conduct in internal or external have purpose
to create healthy organization system. One most important thing could not forgetting is how
made healthy economic competitive climate without fraud in the organization and deliver
equity. Lastly, sharing the data and information through technology access probably make
easier to control management system, check and balance what arrive and what was deliver.
References:
Abdullah. Nahar, Shamsul. (2009). Corporate governance in Malaysia: Towards stronger
boards and audit committees. UMT Inagural Lecture Series : 1. Terengganu:
Universiti Malaysia Terengganu
Bullard, N. (2008), “Indonesia‟s privatisation plans run into troubled waters”, available at:
http://focusweb.org/index2.php?option¼com_content&task¼view&id¼186&pop¼1
&pa (accessed 1 July 2009).
Cadbury A (1992). Report of the Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate
Governance, London.: Gee.
Astami W. Emita, Tower. G, Rusmin Rusmin, Neilson. J, (2010), The effect of privatisation
on performance of state-owned-enterprises in Indonesia, Asian Review of
Accounting, Vol. 18 Iss: 1 pp. 5 - 19
Keasey, K., & Wright, M. (1997). Corporate governance: responsibilities, risks, and
remuneration. Chichester: Wiley.
Koontz, H., Donnell, C., & Weihrich, H. (1980). Management (7th ed.). New York:
McGraw-Hill.
Kubota, Y. (2012, October 10). Toyota to recall 7.4 million vehicles over power window
glitch Reuters. Retrivied from http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/10/10/us-toyota-recall-
idUSBRE89906N20121010?type=companyNews
Mallin, C. (2003). The relationship between corporate governance, transparency and
financial disclosure. Newyork: United Nation.Selected issues in corporate
governance: regional and country experiences. New York u.a.: United Nations.
Control in organization: corporate governance perspective | 12
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (1998b). Corporate
Governance: Improving Competitiveness and Access to Capital in Global Markets.
Rediker, J, K. & Seth, A. (1995) Boards of Directors and Substitution Effects of Alternative
Governance Mechanism. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 16, No. 2, 85-99
Robbins, S. P., & Cenzo, D. A. (2008).Fundamentals of Management (6. ed.). Boston,
Mass.: Pearson.
Schermerhorn, J. R. (2007). Exploring management: In modules. Princeton, NJ: Recording
for the Blind & Dyslexic.
Schermerhorn, J. R. (2011). Introduction to management (11th ed.). Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley.
Steger, U., & Amann, W. (2008).Corporate governance how to add value. Chichester,
England: John Wiley & Sons.
Vallabhaneni, S. R. (2008). Corporate management, governance, and ethics best practices.
Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley.
Toyota. (2012) “Figures : Market / Toyota Sales and Production Toyota. Retrieved from
http://www.toyota-global.com/company/profile/figures/