corporate valuation 2002 - 1 institut for regnskab, tom hansen 1 getting started-agenda introduction...
TRANSCRIPT
Corporate Valuation 2002 - 1Corporate Valuation 2002 - 1
Institut for Regnskab, Tom Hansen
1
GETTING STARTED-agenda• Introduction
– Aim– Means– Literature– Report– What to do– Exam– Practicalities
• Lecture: Background• Next week
Corporate Valuation 2002 - 1Corporate Valuation 2002 - 1
Institut for Regnskab, Tom Hansen
2
Aim• Create an understanding for Corporate Valuation (C.V)
and the thinking lying behind
• Obtain an insight into C.V. in theory and practice
• Practice skills in C.V.• Via 4 elements:
– Literature– Lectures– Workshop/Reports/Negotiations– 2 Guest speakers focusing on essentials
Corporate Valuation 2002 - 1Corporate Valuation 2002 - 1
Institut for Regnskab, Tom Hansen
3
Means
• 1 COACHED WORKSHOP (Monday, 8.55-9.40) + 2 LECTURES (Monday, 9.50-11.30) PER WEEK
• SATURDAY NOV 16TH WHOLE DAY (9.00 - 17.00)!
• GROUPS AND TEAMS • REPORTS TO BE DELIVERED• ACTIVE PARTICIPATION / DIALOG
Corporate Valuation 2002 - 1Corporate Valuation 2002 - 1
Institut for Regnskab, Tom Hansen
4
Literature
• Copeland, Koller & Murrin: Valuation 3ed.• Articles (see handout) - copy from SL
Corporate Valuation 2002 - 1Corporate Valuation 2002 - 1
Institut for Regnskab, Tom Hansen
5
The report
• Purpose: To evaluate the value of one corporation from a buyer or seller perspective
– Analyzing historical performance (accounts)
– Business strategy analysis
– Financial analysis (developments in stock market)
– Prospective analysis (forecast/value)
• To negotiate the price of the corporation with other buyers/sellers (16. November)
– Learnings from negotiations and the valuing process should be included in the final report (25. November)
Corporate Valuation 2002 - 1Corporate Valuation 2002 - 1
Institut for Regnskab, Tom Hansen
6
Please do - THIS WEEK• Form groups (3-4 persons per group, Danes and
non-Danes together) • and Teams (3 groups per team, and one company
per team)• Decide in the teams on which group is buyer and
which is seller (1 against 2 / 2 against 1)• Choose a company and inform me on Email
– and get my acceptance1. Mail group participants, group name and team name,
contact-mail, company, buyer/seller to me ([email protected]) (at the latest on 13. September)
1. Prepare a work plan2. To be formalized sep 16th
Corporate Valuation 2002 - 1Corporate Valuation 2002 - 1
Institut for Regnskab, Tom Hansen
7
Please do - LATER
• Give a presentation during the workshops (exercises)
• Mid stage report (1 A4)– Monday, Oct 21, evening
• Draft report & price– Wednesday, Nov 13, evening
• Negotiation on Saturday Nov 16th• Final report
– incl. “negotiation process and outcome description” + “learning reflections”
– Monday, Nov 25, evening
Corporate Valuation 2002 - 1Corporate Valuation 2002 - 1
Institut for Regnskab, Tom Hansen
8
POSSIBLE TYPES OF COMPANIES • QUOTED - NONQUOTED • BIG - SMALL• HIGH TECH- GOOD OLD LOW TECH• BRANDED - MASS PRODUCTS• B2B - B2C• SUCCESFULL - CRISIS• INTERNATIONAL-REGIONAL-LOCAL• DANISH -FOREIGN• SINGLE BUSINESS -MULTIBUSINESS
Corporate Valuation 2002 - 1Corporate Valuation 2002 - 1
Institut for Regnskab, Tom Hansen
9
Exam
Grades are given on the basis on:• the group report, and• workshop participation on November 16
There will be no “normal” examination.
Corporate Valuation 2002 - 1Corporate Valuation 2002 - 1
Institut for Regnskab, Tom Hansen
10
PRACTICALITIES
• PHOTOCOPIES OF ARTICLES• 1 cd (Excel Spreadsheet + User manual)
– Charlotte Løchte, c102 (10.00-14.00)
• COOPERATE IN TEAMS ON COLLECTION OF BASIC INFORMATION MATERIAL BUT PLEASE DO NOT SPY !!!!!!!
• AND HAVE FUN !• Email: [email protected]
Corporate Valuation 2002 - 1Corporate Valuation 2002 - 1
Institut for Regnskab, Tom Hansen
11
Background lecture• Which value
– market– owner / new owner– fair / correct
• Valuation converts a forecast into a price - using a method and some data
• How do you get the forecast and how do you convert it into a prize ?
• Each method has its own focus and (data) requirements/ assumptions
• Should it be based on dividends, earnings, cash flow, or what ?
• How historic should it be ?– Should the accounts be used ?– How long into the future ?
Corporate Valuation 2002 - 1Corporate Valuation 2002 - 1
Institut for Regnskab, Tom Hansen
12
The valuation-method ”tree”ONE PERIOD:• MULTIPLES (e.g. P/E, Times revenues, Times EBITDA, Times
EBIT, #number of customers)• NET ASSET VALUE (=booked equity) (all assets? At what value?)
– going concern (immaterial / goodwill)– realization / liquidation
MULTIPLE PERIODS:• FLOWS
– direct 1: dividends– indirect: free cash flow - debt
• NET ASSETS AND FLOWS– abnormal earnings + book value (Edward-Bell-Ohlson)
PEER GROUP: (diff. in dividend, leverage, growth, risk?)– on earnings and equity
Corporate Valuation 2002 - 1Corporate Valuation 2002 - 1
Institut for Regnskab, Tom Hansen
13
STEPS in the valuation
• Business Strategy analysis– industry structure– corporate strategy
• Accounts analysis– quality of earnings
• Financial analysis– performance assessment
• Prospective analysis– forecast– valuation
Corporate Valuation 2002 - 1Corporate Valuation 2002 - 1
Institut for Regnskab, Tom Hansen
14
New Foundations 1
• The nature of the firm has changed. – Away from asset intensive, vertically integrated firms, with top down
control over employees.– Towards firms offering (almost) purely human capital (consultants
and technology firms) - (where the (valuable) employees have the right and possibility of leaving).
• Because– Physical assets have become less unique and valuable (improvement
in capital markets, drop in communication costs)– Increased worldwide competition have increased the demand for
talented employees– Firms grips for human capital is weakened (easier access to finance,
many independent suppliers). Many alternative employment opportunities.
Corporate Valuation 2002 - 1Corporate Valuation 2002 - 1
Institut for Regnskab, Tom Hansen
15
New Foundations 2
• This has consequences for the valuation of companies, because ”the growth options are up for grabs”.
• We need a new approach to valuing firms that is consistent with the new nature of firms.
• Basis is a theory of the firm (ex: complementarity, collection of growth options).– What is the unit-of-analysis (are the firm boundaries stable) ?– How is value generated ?– How is this value distributed between equity and the other
stakeholders ?
Corporate Valuation 2002 - 1Corporate Valuation 2002 - 1
Institut for Regnskab, Tom Hansen
16
Corporate Architect (PWC)
Increase shareholder value by value based management
• Shaping strategy and management (fig.2.2)– Develop the concept (valuation of entities)
– Use it in strategic decision making (investments & targets)
– And in operating decisions making (planning & budgeting)
– Institutionalize it in culture, perf.measurements, and incentives
• Linking the management processes in a ”finance value line” (fig.1.4)
Corporate Valuation 2002 - 1Corporate Valuation 2002 - 1
Institut for Regnskab, Tom Hansen
17
Rationality
4 main decision making models
• rational
• bounded-rational
• political
• garbage can
The profit max./SHV approach is declining in relevance down the models
Corporate Valuation 2002 - 1Corporate Valuation 2002 - 1
Institut for Regnskab, Tom Hansen
18
Evode Group 1
• Andrew Simon is chairman of Evode Group with 5 different divisions.
• After many years with profitable growth, the turnover in 1991 is 6% down from 1990 to £m. 279 and profit after tax is more than halved from £m. 15,2 to £m. 7,3. The stock price is down to p. 43 more or less equivalent to the intrinsic value of p. 46 calculated based on cash flows.
• Analysts forecast a 1992 profit of £m. 8,9.• What should Andrew Simon do ?
Corporate Valuation 2002 - 1Corporate Valuation 2002 - 1
Institut for Regnskab, Tom Hansen
19
Evode Group 2
• A hostile takeover bid from Wassal of p. 80 turns up - calculated by its CEO Chris Miller based on Peer Group multiples, indicating a value of p. 112. Evodes stock price rises to p. 103
• Andrew Simons fights back signaling profit
improvements in 1992 to £m.10,2 - so Chris Miller quickly improves his bid to p. 95.
• What’s next ?
Corporate Valuation 2002 - 1Corporate Valuation 2002 - 1
Institut for Regnskab, Tom Hansen
20
Evode Group 3
• A "white knight" Laporte and its CEO Ken Minton takes up 6,1% of the shares at 100 p. announcing it will make a bid above p. 100 for the rest. The offer is p. 120 paid in "paper" and gets the deal.
• Its own shares falls 10% in total - although its
assessment of the acquisition value of Evode is p. 240.
Should anybody have acted otherwise ?
Corporate Valuation 2002 - 1Corporate Valuation 2002 - 1
Institut for Regnskab, Tom Hansen
21
Next
• 3 hours• Workshop (8.55-9.40)
– Groups, teams and companies– Workplan presentation by each team - on
Overhead please– Exercise: 2,7 – 2,9 – 2.10– Dialog and coaching
• Lecture: What to Measure and Manage CKM: 1, 2, 3 + Articles