corrosion, fouling & scale formation in … 2013 presentations/day-2 at pmi...biggest sea water...
TRANSCRIPT
CORROSION, FOULING & SCALE
FORMATION IN SEA WATER COOLING
SYSTEM - A CASE STUDY WITH
REFERENCE TO SCALING PROBLEM OF
NTPC-SIMHADRI UNIT#III
BY
P GHOSH
AGM CHEMISTRY
Presentation Elutes..,
SEA WATER CONDENSER COOLING
SEA WATER RELATED PROBLEMS
RECENT PROBLEMS FACED ON SCALING
DATA COLLECTION
RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS OF THE PROBLEM
CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TAKEN
UNIT 3 CONDENSER CHEMICAL CLEANING
OBSERVATIONS AFTER CHEMICAL CLEANING
PROPOSED DESIGN FOR PROCESS IMPROVEMENT
CONCLUSION
UNIQUE FEATURES OF SIMHADRI
First Coastal Coal fired
Thermal Power Project of
NTPC
Simhadri has the First Sea
Water Cooled Condenser in
NTPC
Biggest Sea Water Intake well
constructed in Bay of Bengal
Biggest Natural Draft Cooling
Tower of Asia (165 M)
CW fore-bay
CW pumps
CONDENSER
Cooling towers
1 2
Sampling points for ReCl2
chlorine dozing
Gas chlorination For CW system
Electro-chlorinator at
Sea water intake Sampling point for ReCL2
SCHEME AT SIMHADRI
1.5 COC
DESIGN OF SIMHADRI COOLING WATER SYSTEM
Sl. No. Parameter UM Design value
1 Design CW flow M3/hr 54,000
2 Temp. rise of CW deg C 10.4
4 Design CW inlet temp. deg C 33
5 CW side pressure drop mwc 4.0
6 No. of condenser passes No. 2
7 Total no. of tubes No. 24,398
8
Tube material :
a) Condensating zone
b) A/c zone
--- Welded Titanium SB-338 Gr II
9 Water box design pressure kg/cm2 5.0
CORROSION
SCALING
FOULING
SALT DEPOSITION
NEAR BY
INSULATORS
SEA WATER
RELATED
PROBLEMS
MARINE FOULING
ALGAE FUNGI ,
BACTERIA
MUSSELS AND
VERNACLES
GENERAL FOULING
POROUS DEPOSITS
DIRT,SILTS
HARD CRYSTALINE
DEPOSIT OF SALTS
OF Ca & Ma, Sio2
ELECTROCHEMICAL
REACTIONS
INVOLVING O2
Nearly saturated
with salt
And large no of
marine species
PROCESS
MANAGEMENT
MAINTENANCE
PRACTICES
ENGINEERING
SW LARGER PIPELINES-PU COATED
SW SMALLER PIPE LINES - HDPE OR
SS 316L
CONDENSER TUBES-TITANIUM
WATER BOX-FRE COATED
ELECTROCHLORINATION
GAS CHLORINATION AT CW
FOREBAY
CONTINUOUS CHLORINATION
ONLINE TUBE CLEANING
THOROUGH INSPECTION AND
RECOATING OF DEFECTIVE LAYERS
CLEANING OF CT SUMP AND
NOZZLES
CONDENSER HPW JET CLEANING
CARRYING OUT CORROSION TEST
WITH CECRI
FEATURES TO COMBAT SEA WATER
RELATED PROBLEMS
Huge colonial growth of marine species (vernacles) inside and
outside submerged surfaces of the AW overflow lagoon and
pipelines of the AW recirculation sump.
The growth inside the pipe line caused huge flow restriction
Lead to stopping of AW recirculation pumps.
The entire system has been taken under shutdown for manual
cleaning.
PROBLEMS FACED BY THE STATION
FOULING
PROBLEMS FACED BY THE STATION
CORROSION
cooling towers, condenser water box, ARCW, Sea
water pp house area - some of the vulnerable places
for corrosion
station has faced corrosion problem in its cooling
tower racer columns
For the stage I cooling towers lot of study has been
carried out through CBRI. Accordingly maintenance
of the columns has been done by the site
Study regarding suitability of the paint for marine
environment -through CECRI
A coating of thick hard scale had developed in the UIII of stage II
500MW condenser tubes(more in top half ), the water boxes , the
complete hot water duct and its CT nozzles fill material
Scale is of almost 0.7 to 1.2 mm thickness ,primarily composed of
Calcium Carbonate (~92%)
The scale formed was too hard to remove with high pr water jet and
CONCO bullet cleaning
Ti tube condenser scaling and its chemical cleaning was unique in
nature and was never done anywhere in India
The problem jointly studied by site, NETRA and OS
RECENT PROBLEM FACED BY THE STATION
SCALING
To ETP 4200
All values in m3/hr SEA WATER BALANCE
ST I 2x500 MW
SYSTEM
To Ash Handling Plant 934
Evaporation Loss 1795
Debris Filter 5
From Sea 6934
Blow down required to maintain <1.5 COC is ~2000 M3/unit
Actual blow down in ST-I was 2600/unit with 1.3 COC
To ETP NIL (blow down
system not available)
All values in m3/hr SEA WATER BALANCE FOR
3x500MW during initial period
SYSTEM
To Ash Handling Plant 1000
Evaporation Loss 900
Debris Filter 5
From Sea
9000
To ST-I 6930
To U#III 2070
Leads to actual COC around 2.0 against design COC 1.5
ST II was under higher COC for about 06 to 07 months
1.10
1.20
1.30
1.40
1.50
1.60
1.70
1.80
1.90
2.00
2.10
2.20
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
COC LIMIT
---- ST II
---- ST I
JANUARY-OCTOBER
CO
C
PROBLEM IS KNOWN
Standard practice of scale removal a) HP water jetting b)
CONCO Cleaning c) Chemical cleaning followed by HP and
CONCO cleaning
HP and CONCO was not at all able to remove the scale
Chemical cleaning
Needs careful study as the
Tubes are Ti and the water box tube plate
is FRE coated and the ducts are PU coated
Calcium Carbonate Super saturation
Supersaturated solutions of calcium carbonate can be formed from
saturated or under saturated solutions when the calcium hardness, pH
or alkalinity are increased
The degree of calcium carbonate saturation (S) is given by the ratio
of the actual ion activity product (IAP) and the
thermodynamic solubility product constant at infinite dilution (KS):
S = IAP/KS = {Ca2+}{CO32–}/KS
= [Ca2+] γCa+2 [CO3 2–] γCO2 3–/KS
S = [Ca2+][CO32–]/Cks
S values of <1, 1, and >1 represent under saturation, saturation,
and oversaturation, respectively
Conditions effecting scale formation Physical :
Thermodynamic: The solubility limit must be exceeded. .i.e.
there must be super saturation
Kinetic: The deposition rate must be sufficiently high
Increase in temperature decrease solubility of CaCO3
Increase in Pressure increase solubility of CaCO3
Conditions effecting scale formation
Chemical:
Increase of pH favours formation of CaCO3 scale
With increase in alkalinity scale formation tendency increases
The solubility of CaCO3 in saline water is more than that in
natural sweet water
Both Calcite and Aragonite are more soluble
at higher salinity because of the
thermodynamics of the system. Thus, the
saturation concentration of calcite and
aragonite will also depends on salinity
As pH increases, calcium carbonate solubility
exponentially decreases. Therefore, in case of
increasing CO2 input into the ocean ,which
reduces pH, calcium carbonate will more
susceptible to dissolution.
Useful indices for determining corrosion and scale
tendencies of makeup water
Ryzner (or Stability) Index (RSI) = RSI = 2pHs – pH
Langelier (or Saturation) Index (LSI) = LSI = pH – pHs
Puckorious (or modified stability) index=PSI = 2pHs – pHe,
(pHequilibrium = 1.465log (total alkalinity))
8.70
8.80
8.90
9.00
9.10
9.20
9.30
9.40
9.50
9.60
9.70
9.80
Jan Feb Mar APR May Jun
PSI
4.00
4.10
4.20
4.30
4.40
4.50
4.60
RSI
1.70
1.75
1.80
1.85
1.90
1.95
2.00
Jan Feb Mar APR May Jun
LSI
OBSERVATIONS FROM INDICES
RSI and PSI values indicate the increased tendency towards scaling
The literature survey does not clearly reflect about the applicability
of index calculation to sea water
Actual experiment is done with Marble test
pH pHs CaH M Alk LSI by
calculati
on
LSI by
Marble
test
RSI by
calcula
tion
RSI by
marble
test
PSI by
calculati
on
PSI by
marble
test
Ionic
product
Sol. Prod
Const5
SW 8.41 8.13 930 115 1.2-1.4 +0.28 5.7-6.5 7.85 10.5-11 12.9 1.07x10 -5 3.7x10-9
CWI
I
8.39 7.96 1395 150 1.79-
1.94
+0.43 4.5-4.6 7.53 9.6-9.9 13.07 2.1x10-5 3.7x10-9
RW 8.96 9.27 40.45 99 0.5-0.9 -0.31 10.5-
11.5
9.58 12.8-
13.4
15.61 0.5x10-5 3.7x10-9
NOTE: LSI -ve unsaturated .i.e. corrosive tendency
LSI +ve super saturated .i.e. scaling tendency
For sea water: By calc-severe scaling and by test -slight scaling (LSI taken for reference)
For Circulating water: By calc-severe scaling and by test-moderate scaling(LSI taken for reference)
It is apparent that in case of Sea water, at and more than design
COC of 1.5 the value of Ca hardness (1395 as CaCO3) is much
more than 5 times than that of 5 COC wrt Sweat water (202 as
CaCO3)
The crystal of the scale deposit as observed in Simhadri was of
glassy in appearance and extremely hard and non porous
Sweet water Scale at KhSTPP Sea water scale at SIMHADRI
Effect of the problem
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Feb-12 Mar-12 Apr-12 May-12 Jun-12 Jul-12 Aug-12
Avg vacuum loss
S
H
U
T
D
O
W
N
mm
Hg
UIII 500MW Scale Deposit analysis report
PARAMETER CONDENSER CONDENSER
BACK SIDE
% Moisture 2.9% 7.2%
Loss on
ignition (at
400oC)
8.5% 5.69%
% OF Ca as
CaCO3
90.12% 91.91%
% of sulphate 2.16% 2.52%
% of Iron 0.1% 0.095%
Acid insoluble 4.12% 4.56%
Sea Water & CW Analysis Report during the 06months period
Parameter Unit Sea water Stage - I CW Stage - II CW
pH 8.2 8.4 8.42
TSS ppm 22 26 28
TDS ppm 37355 56800 58900
Turbidity NTU 1.58 3.2 7.81
Conductivity µS/cm 45200 67300 70300
Residual Chlorine ppm 1 0.6 0.6
Total Hardness ppm as CaCO3 5600 7600 10400
Ca hardness ppm as CaCO3 800 1000 1600
Mg Hardness ppm as CaCO3 4800 6600 8800
Chloride ppm as CaCO3 26790 33840 47940
P- Alkalinity ppm as CaCO3 6 18 20
M- Alkalinity ppm as CaCO3 102 108 146
Silica ppm as SiO2 2.1 2.2 2.53
Sodium + Potassium ppm 21000 29200 32000
Iron ppm 0.117 0.29 0.4
COMPATIBILITY STUDY
Before adopting a cleaning method analysis has been done
jointly by SITE and NETRA and for :-
The solubility of the scale (.i.e. 92% CaCO3) in the acid
Compatibility of Titanium metal in the acid used to dissolve
the scale by measuring the corrosion rate
Effect of chemicals, temperature and process on the FRE and
the PU coating
Acid Solubility of scale Compatibility of titanium
tube
*3-10% phosphoric
acid
Negligible solubility compatible
* 3.5 % Hydrochloric
acid
Completely soluble
within 15 minutes
Compatible with 0.2% FeCl3
inhibitor
* 3% citric acid +
Ammonia
Negligible solubility compatible
* 3.5% Sulphamic
acid
Completely soluble
within 30 minutes
Compatible with 0.2% FeCl3
inhibitor
* Chromic acid Negligible solubility compatible
* From literature
* From site study
S.
N
O
Sample description pH Initial
Weight
Final
weight
Weight
loss in g
Density
in g/cc
Total
Surface
area
mm2
Time
in Hrs
Corrosion
rate in
mpy
1 3.5% Sulphamic acid +
0.1% FeCl3 at 62deg C
1.75 9.682 9.679 0.0023 5.407 6716 6 3.699
2 3.5% Sulphamic acid +
0.2% FeCl3 at 62deg C
1.67 10.0525 10.051 0.0011 5.407 6817 6 1.743
3 3.5% Sulphamic acid +
0.3% FeCl3 at 62deg C
1.61 11.2629 11.26 0.0025 5.407 7825 6 3.451
4 3.5% HCl + 0.2%
FeCl3 at 62deg C
1 9.9562 9.9535 0.0027 5.407 6817 6 4.278
From all the above tests and analysis, the suitable methodology
has been proposed for scale removal .i.e. by using 3.5%
sulphamic acid with 0.2% FeCl3 as inhibitor at 62 deg C
CaCO3 + 2(NH2.SO3H) Ca(NH2 SO3)2 +H2O + CO2
CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TAKEN
To ensure that further scale formation does not take
place a contingency blow down arrangement has been
made maintaining COC less than 1.5
CW chemical treatment started for the control of
further scaling (till the CW blow down system for
Stage II is commissioned .i.e. about 4 months)
UNIT 3 CONDENSER CHEMICAL CLEANING
Chemical cleaning Procedure is by Inhibited Sulphamic acid
(along with ferric chloride) cleaning followed by high pr water
jetting and CONCO cleaning
Prior to start of chemical a 150mm wide FRE coating was
removed from the CW line for fixing of 16mm MS dummy
plates for isolation of CW inlet and outlet ducts
0.2% of technical grade ferric chloride inhibitor is added to the
water and when the ferric chloride is observed in the outlet,
inhibited Sulphamic acid (3.0 to 3.5 % w/w) is introduced into the
system monitoring the acidity level
Temperature oC Acid strength % Total Hardness ppm
as CaCO3
Ca Hardness ppm as
CaCO3
pH
Inlet Outlet Inlet Outlet Inlet Outlet Inlet Outlet Inlet Outlet
65 60 0.77 0.194 - - - 2.3 7.0
67 61 0.582 0.194 - 6900 - 6250 - -
67 62 3.10 0.194 - 10250 - 9500 2.1 4.69
68 63 2.52 0.194 - 13750 - 13000 - -
68 64 2.52 0.194 - 17500 - 16750 2 3.58
66 64 3.52 0.58 - 22000 - 21500 - -
63 61 1.35 0.58 - 32000 - 30000 - -
65 59 3.10 0.58 - 34000 - 32500 1.82 2.8
65 59 4.65 1.64 - 45000 - 44000 - -
65 59 3.29 1.9 - 47000 - 45500 1.7 2.2
65 60 3.49 2.13 50500 51363 48000 48500 1.75 1.9
65 64 2.91 2.32 54000 53000 52000 51500 - -
65 64 1.94 1.94 54500 54500 53000 53000 1.8 1.8
Results of analysis for condenser chemical cleaning of Pass - A
Results of analysis for condenser chemical cleaning of Pass – B
Temperature oC Acid strength % Total Hardness ppm as
CaCO3
Ca Hardness ppm as
CaCO3
pH
Inlet Outlet Inlet Outlet Inlet Outlet Inlet Outlet Inlet Outlet
61 53 2.13 - - - - - 2.4 7.0
64 54 1.34 0.194 - 17500 - - 2.2 6.0
61 57 5.62 0.38 - 28500 - 16250 2.0 5.7
62 58 5.23 0.58 - 30000 - 29500 - -
65 60 2.71 0.97 - 38500 - 1.94 3.2
65 64 4.46 0.97 - 50000 - 49000 - -
65 64 3.49 1.16 - 53500 - 52500 1.92 2.74
66 64 3.64 1.16 - 57000 - 56500 - -
58 55 1.9 1.26 - 54500 - 54000 1.7 2.3
58 54 4.85 1.16 36750 54500 49500 54000 - -
60 58 3.49 1.74 55000 57000 52000 55500 1.9 1.76
62 59 3.49 2.32 55500 57000 52500 55500 1.85 1.7
63 62 1.74 1.74 56500 57000 55000 54500 1.8 1.7
OBSERVATIONS AFTER CHEMICAL CLEANING
About 28MT of scale was removed apart from huge quantity of
loose debris accumulated on the partition and the bottom plates
After chemical cleaning and water jetting at 320 bar pr also a thin
but adherent layer remained on the inside of the tube surfaces more
so on the upper 30-40% tubes of the top half of the condenser
With CONCO bullet cleaning about 1000kgs of loose and broken
hard scale was removed from each pass.
Still a layer of thin scale is observed on the upper half of the top
half of the condenser
After CONCO cleaning of
pass A, the top rows rear view
still having scale deposit
After CONCO cleaning of pass B,
the top rows front view still having
scale deposit
Observations Continued…
P/P
Titanium Tubes
Rear water box Front water box
CW INLET DUCT
CW O/L
DUCT
Man
hole
M
an
hole
Man
hole
ACID I/L
Recirculation tank
vent
ACID O/L
vent
Proposed design by site for process
improvement
The process design proposed is mainly to ensure the following
To ensure the upper rows remain in acid contact
Rear side and front side venting to remain always open
P/P
Titanium Tubes
Rear water box Front water box
CW INLET DUCT
CW O/L
DUCT
Man
hole
M
an
hole
Man
hole
ACID I/L
Recirculation tank
vent
ACID O/L
vent
CONCLUSION
Sea water application is corrosive but it is equally
dangerous from fouling and scaling point of view
The nature of the scale developed due to Sea water
is extremely hard with Ca content ~ 92%
compare to sweet water scale with Ca content 70-80%
In Simhadri the scale developed is so hard and non
porous though it dissolves in acid, it does not get
softened
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
31.10.1
1
21.01.1
2
08.02.1
2
28.02.1
2
05.03.1
2
10.03.1
2
23.04.1
2
07.05.1
2
20.07.1
2
08.08.1
2
29.12.1
2
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
TREND OF VACUUM
Vacuum
(mmhg)
Loss due to
Dirty tubes
(mmhg)
CW I/L
Temp
(Deg.C)
TTD
CW dT
104.5
64.04
5.15
23.92
Area Actions Heat Rate Recovery
(Kcal/Kwh)
Condenser Acid cleaning carried out.
( Vacuum Improved by 18.77 mm hg) 21.77
CT
Internal inspection, Nozzle cleaning &
replacement done (Performance
Improvement factor Improved by 2.73
Deg.C)
10.96
Total Improvements 32.73
Improvements Achieved
As the bottom half of the condenser tubes are
completely cleaned it was found not advisable to go
for another immediate chemical cleaning
The top rows need more time of contact with acid
Proper release of CO2 evolved during the process
needs to be appropriately taken care
The problem faced by the station gives an
opportunity for in depth study and come out with
solution
Contd…
REFERENCES
Journal of the Swimming Pool and Spa Industry Volume 2,
Number 2, pages 23–29 Copyright © 2001by JSPSI
Calcium carbonate saturation index and alkalinity interpretations
by T.E.Larson AND A.M.Buswell
Saturation, stability, and scaling indices by Robert R. Cavano –
Scranton Associates, Incorporated
Factors affecting calcium carbonate equilibrium, Wikipedia
Solubility product constants, Wikipedia
Industrial Chemical cleaning by James McCoy