cosmeceuticals: a review of the scientific evidence

63
Cosmeceuticals: A Review of the Scientific Evidence Molly Wanner, MD/MBA

Upload: others

Post on 06-Dec-2021

5 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

Cosmeceuticals: A Review of the Scientific Evidence

Molly Wanner, MD/MBA

Page 2: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

Disclosures

I have the following relevant financial relationship with a commercial interest to

disclose:

Scientific Advisory Board, Nu Skin

Grand funding, Solta

Investment, Clarity Cosmetics

Page 3: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

What Is a Cosmeceutical?

Page 4: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

Drugs: Mitigate, prevent, or treat disease. Affect body structure.

Cosmetic: A product intended to improve appearance with NO effect on structure and function of skin

Page 5: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

“Cosmeceuticals” = Cosmetic

Page 6: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

6 out of 10 people believe that over the counter products are regulated

Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (1938)

• Ingredients in cosmetics and personal care products are NOT obliged to FDA standard regulatory practices (with exception of food color additives)

• FDA prohibits adulterated or misbranded products

Page 7: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

Cosmetics Are Not Regulated

What does this mean?

• FDA cannot require companies to submit pre-marketing safety data

• FDA cannot require companies to report any side effects of products reported by consumers

• Instead, monitoring is performed by the Personal Care Products Counsel

-Sponsored by cosmetics industry

Page 8: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

Savvy Consumers Started Asking Questions

Modmarcc.com

Are my products safe?

Do my products work?

Page 9: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

Are My Products Safe?

The Clean Cosmetics movement

The search for “non toxic” products

Page 10: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

“Clean” Cosmetics: The “Bad” List

Methylisothiazolinone (MI), methylchloroisothiazolinone (MCI), Vitamin A derivatives, fragrance mix, phenoxyethanol, petroleum distillates, formaldehydes, triclosan and triclocarban, toluene, resorcinol, petroleum distillates, butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA), boric acid and sodium borate, phthalates, placenta extract, parabens, phenoxyethanol, PEGs and ceteareth(1,4-dioxane), formaldehydes, coal tar ingredients (including aminophenol, diaminobenzene and phenylenediamine), petroleum distillates, placenta extract

Page 11: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

What Is Toxic?

• Toxicity depends on dosage (concentration and absorption)

• There is too much of a good thing.

– Fat soluble vitamins A, D, E, K are stored

– Chronic excessive supplementation can lead to coma or death

• “Natural” ≠ non toxic

– Poison Ivy is “natural”

Page 12: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

“Clean” Cosmetics: Let’s See the Science

Commonly avoided chemicals grouped into three categories: irritants/allergens, potential endocrine disruptors, potential carcinogens

PubMed Search performed for chemicals in each above category, with attention to:

• Type of study/study subjects (human data available?)

• Dose (relevant to routine exposure?)

• Route of administration (topical?)

Arrived at a “shortlist” of chemicals that may be worth avoiding

Dr. Neera Nathan

Page 13: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

Clean Cosmetics3 Categories of “Bad” Ingredients

CarcinogensEndocrine

Disruptors

Allergens

Irritants

Page 14: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

Allergens and Irritants Commonly avoided in “Clean” products

• Formaldehyde

• Fragrance

• Methylisothiazone (MI)

• Methylchloroisothiazolinone (MCI)

• Phenoxyethanol

• Petroleum distillates

• Vitamin A

Allergens

Irritants

Page 15: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

Allergens and Irritants What does the science back up avoiding?

• Formaldehyde – hair straightener

• Fragrance

• Methylisothiazone (MI) - preservative

• Methylchloroisothiazolinone (MCI) - preservative

• Phenoxyethanol

• Petroleum distillates

• Vitamin A

Allergens

Irritants

Allergens of the year

Page 16: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

Allergens and Irritants What can stay in the cosmetic bag?

• Formaldehyde

• Fragrance

• Methylisothiazone (MI)

• Methylchloroisothiazolinone (MCI)

• Phenoxyethanol

• Petroleum distillates

• Vitamin A

Allergens

Irritants

Page 17: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

Endocrine DisruptorsImitate hormones & interfere with normal signaling of chemical messengers

Endocrine

Disruptors

Page 18: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

DES (Diethylstilbestrol)Endocrine disruptor in Medical History

• Synthetic estrogen given orally to women in 1940s to 1970s to prevent miscarriage

• Linked to clear cell adenocarcinoma of the vagina and cervix in daughters of women who received this medication

Page 19: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

Endocrine DisruptorsWhat does the science back up avoiding?

Commonly avoided in “Clean” products

• Triclosan and triclocarbon

• Parabens

• Phthalates

• Toluene

• Resorcinol

• Petroleum

• Butylated hydroxyanisole

• Boric acid and sodium borate

• Placenta extract

• Phenoxyethanol

Endocrine

Disruptors

?

More research is needed.

Page 20: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

More Research Is NeededToxicity depends on concentration and absorption

• Most studies performed in vitro and in animals

• In animal studies, ingredients studied at high doses, orally or subcutaneously

• In human studies, source is unclear, not specifically topical, conflicting studies

Page 21: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

Endocrine Disruptors

• Parabens –preservative, antimicrobial

• Phthalates – softener in shampoos and nail polish

• Triclosan and triclocarbon –antimicrobial in toothpaste and deodorant

• Universal

• Many sources

• Absorbed through skin

• Animal studies

• Difficult to link to topicals

• No definitive link to human disease

Page 22: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

ParabensPreservative in cosmetics, moisturizers, shampoos, food additives, food packaging, pharmaceuticals

• Penetrate skin. 99% rapidly metabolized in skin to weaker metabolite.

• Weak estrogen

– 4 most common parabens 10,000 less potent than estradiol

Fransway AF et al. Paraben Toxicology. Dermatitis 2019; 30: 32-45.Fransway AF et al. Parabens: Contact (Non)allergen of the year. Dermatitis 2018.Final amended report of safety assessment of methylparaben, ethylparaben, propylparaden, isopropylparaben, and benzylparaben as used in cosmetic products. Inter J Toxicology 2008; 27: 1-82.Darbre et al. J applied toxicology 2014; 34: 925-938.Harley et al. Human reproduction 2019; 34: 109-117.

Page 23: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

In Vivo Studies of Parabens ConflictAre parabens endocrine disruptors?

• 338 children in farmworkingcommunity

• Increased urinary levels of methylparaben associated with shift (1.3-1.5 months) in pubarche (pubic hair appearance) and <1 month (menarche)

• 1239 girls in NYC, Cincinnati, San Francisco: No impact on puberty

• Human studies: no impact on semen quality or sperm DNA

Harley et al. Association of phthalates, parabens and phenols in personal care products with pubertal timing in girls and boys. Human reproduction 2019; 34: 109-117. Wolff MS et al. Environmental Phenols and Pubertal Development in Girls. Environ Int 2015; 84: 174-180.Nishihama Y et al. Paraben exposure and semen quality of Japanese male partners of subfertile couples. Environ Health Prev Med 2017; 7: 22-5.

YES NO

Page 24: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

Phthalate “Tha-leit”Enhance flexibility of plastic (“plasticizers”), food wrappers, flooring,

medical devices, toys, lacquers, varnish, personal care products

• Phthalates can be absorbed through the skin

– Baby lotion in infants<8 months& powder > 8 months

• Not all phthalates are alike

– In personal care products, diethyl phthalate (DEP) most common in US

– DEP does not have hormonal activity

– Long side chain phthalates have weak hormone activity at high doses Witorsch RJ and Thomas JA. Personal care products and endocrine disruption. Crit Rev Toxic 2010; 40: 1-30.

Janjua NR. Urinary excretion of phthalates and paraben after repeated whole-body topical application in humans. Int J andrology 2008; 31: 118-130.Sathyanarayana S et al. Baby Care Products. Pediatrics 2008; 121: 260-8.Sathyanarayana S et al. Baby Care Products: Possible sources of infant phthalate exposure. Pediatrics 2008; 121: 260-268.

DEPNo hormone activity

DEHPWeak hormone activity

Long side chain

Page 25: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

PhthalateEndocrine disruption potential?

• Inverse association of concentration with breast development (Wolff)

• Possible association of DEHP on male genitalia (Swan)

• No association in pubertal timing in girls or boys (Harley)

Witorsch RJ and Thomas JA. Personal care products and endocrine disruption. Crit Rev Toxic 2010; 40: 1-30.Wolff MS. Investigation of relationships between urinary biomarkers of phytoestrogens, phthalates and phenols and pubertal stages in girls. Environ Health Perspect 2010; 118: 1939-1046.Harley et al. Association of phthalates, parabens, and phenols found in personal care products with pubertal timing in girls and boys.Human Reproduction 2019; 34: 109-117.Swan SH. Environmental phthalate exposure in relation to reproductive outcomes and other health endpoints. Environ Red 2008; 108: 177-184.

YES NO

Long side chainWeak hormone activityHigh doses impact rat fertility

Page 26: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

TriclosanAntibacterial and antifungal deodorants,

toothpaste, clothing, household items

• Animal studies show dose dependent impact on thyroid– Rat study: Dose dependent

decrease of T4 with oral triclosan

• RCT of 132 subjects and 0.3% triclosan in toothpaste – no impact on thyroid

• Human studies conflict

Zorrilla LM et al. The effects of triclosan on puberty and thyroid hormones in males wistar rats. Tox Sciences 2009: 107: 56-64.Cullinan MP et al. Long term use of triclosan toothpaste and thyroid function Science of the Total Environment 2012; 416: 75-79.Mihaich E et al. Hypothesis-driven weight of evidence analysis of endocrine disruption potential: a case study with triclosan. Critical reviews in toxicology 2017 47: 263-285Deierlein AL et al Phenol concentrations during childhood and subsequent measures of adiposity among young girls. Am J Epid 2017; 186: 581-592.Li S et al. Urinary triclosan concentrations are inversely associated with body mass index and waist circumference in US general population: experience in NHANES 2003-2010. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2015; 218: 401-406.

YES NOAvoid?

Page 27: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

Potential CarcinogensCommonly avoided in “Clean” products

• Formaldehyde

• Coal tar ingredients

• Petroleum

• 1-4 dioxane

• Placenta extract

Carcinogens

Page 28: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

Potential CarcinogensWhat does the science back up avoiding?

Formaldehyde

• Linked to cancer in animals and humans in high doses including topical occupational exposure

• Labeled a known carcinogen by NIH National Toxicology Program

Formaldehyde

25,619 workers in the formaldehyde industry: link between formaldehyde and nasopharyngeal cancerBeane Freeman LE. Mortality from solid tumors amount workers in formaldehyde industries.: An update of the NCI cohort. Am J Indus Med 2013; 56: 1015-1026.

Coal Tar

1,4 dioxane

Petroleum

distillates

Placenta

extract

Page 29: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

Coal Tar

Formaldehyde

1,4 dioxane

Petroleum

distillates

Placenta

extract

Potential CarcinogensWhat can we leave in the bag?

Page 30: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

Coal Tar

– Industrial use linked to cancer~“chimney sweeps”– Cohort study of 13,200patients did not increaserisk of malignancies

Potential CarcinogensWhat can we leave in the bag?

Page 31: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

Coal Tar

Formaldehyde

1,4 dioxane

Petroleum

Distillates?

Placenta

extract

Potential CarcinogensWhat can we leave in the bag?

Page 32: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

• CRUDE petroleum on the skin of 50 mice increased skin cancer

• Cosmetics have highly refined petroleum distillates– Poly aromatic

hydrocarbons are not present (known carcinogen)

• 4 Human studies: petrolatum stays in superficial skin due to size

Clark CR, Walter MK, Ferguson PW, Katchen M. Comparative dermal carcinogenesis of shale and petroleum-derived distillates. Toxicol Ind Health 1988; 4: 11-22. Rawlings AV and Lombard KJ. A review on the extensive skin benefits of mineral oil. In J Cos Sci 2012; 34: 511-518.Petry T et al. Review of data on the dermal penetration of mineral oils and waxes used in cosmetic applications. Tox Letters 2017;280: 70-78.

PetroleumDistillates

Mineral oilLight mineral oilHeavy mineral oilLiquid ParaffinMineral oil mistParaffin oil

Petrolatum liquidPetroleum oilParaffinum liquidum

Potential CarcinogensWhat can we leave in the bag?

Page 33: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

Coal Tar

Formaldehyde

1,4 dioxane

Refined

Petroleum

Placenta

extract

Potential CarcinogensWhat can we leave in the bag?

More data

More data

Page 34: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

Do My Products Work?

Modmarcc.com

Are my products safe?

Do my products work?

Page 35: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

Common Cosmeceuticals

• Vitamins A, B, C

• Growth Factors

• Peptides

• Sugars

Page 36: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

Koo E, Kimball A, and Wanner M. Cosmeceuticals. In: Griffiths C, Barker J, Bleiker T, Chalmers R, and Creamer D Eds. Rook’s Textbook of Dermatology, 9th Edition. Wiley-Blackwell, 2016.

Page 37: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

Absorbed?Biologic

effect?

Clinical

effect? Yes

Do My Products Work?

Page 38: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

Absorbed?Biologic

effect?

Clinical

effect?Recommend

Page 39: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

Absorbed?

Page 40: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

Absorption (J) = Permeability coefficient * Concentration

(Partition coefficient*Diffusion coefficient/Length of path of diffusion)

Concentration and Molecular Weight Influences Absorption

<500

dalton

Hydrophilic – lipophilic balance

Non ionized

Non polar

pH

Page 41: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

DOES MY PRODUCT WORK?Can Vitamin A be absorbed through the skin?

Page 42: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

Vitamin A: Tretinoin Is Our Gold Standard for Photoaging

• 6 double blind, controlled studies

• 2 largest trials – 619 subjects

– Followed for 6 months

– 86% had global improvementvs 44% control

Weinstein GD et al. Arch Derm 1991Olsen EA. JAAD 1992. Wanner et al. JDD 2015; 14: 13-18.

Page 43: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

OTC Vitamin A: Retinaldehyde Induces Retinoic Acid Activity in Humans More Than Retinol

Retinol

Retinaldehyde(Retinal)

All transretinoic acid(Tretinoin)

Duell EA et al. Extraction of human epidermis treated with retinol yields retro-retinoids in addition to free retinol and retinyl esters.JID 1996; 107: 178-182.Saurat JH et al. Topical retinaldehyde on human skin: biologic effects and tolerance. JID 1994; 103: 770-774.

Page 44: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

Vitamin A – Retinaldehyde Reduces Fine Lines

• 125 subjects, retinaldehyde 0.05 vstretinoin 0.05 vsplacebo

• Silicone replicas of crows feet

• Improvement of photoaging

Creidi P et al. Profilometric evaluation of photodamage after topical retinaldehyde and retinoic acid treatment. JAAD 1998; 39: 960-5.

Tretinoin RA Placebo

Page 45: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

Retinol Reduces Fine Lines

• Retinol 0.4% (36 subjects): -1.64 point improvement wrinkles vs control on 9 pt scale (statistically significant)

• Concentration in cosmeceuticals can be as low as 0.08%

Lee et al. A newly synthesized photostable retinol derivative (retinyl N-formyl aspartamate) for photodamaged skin: profilometricevaluation of 24-week study. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2006;55:220–4.Manela-Azulay M, Bagatin E. Cosmeceutical vitamins. Clin Dermatol 2009; 27: 469-74.Kafi et al. Improvement of naturally aged skin with Vitamin A (retinol). Arch Derm 2007; 143: 606-612.

Page 46: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

My Approach to Vitamin A

• Retinaldehyde when can not tolerate tretinoin

• Concentration matters

Page 47: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

Vitamin B3

Niacin

Nicotinic acid

Nicotinamide

/

Niacinamide

Inositol

hexanicotinate

Does My Product Work?Vitamin B3

Page 48: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

Vitamin B3

• Precursors of NAD(H) and NADP(H) enzymes –oxidative metabolism

• +ceramides and keratinocyte differentiation

Page 49: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

Can Vitamin B3 Be Absorbed Through the Skin?

Page 50: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence
Page 51: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

Vitamin B3 Improves Skin Barrier Function

Placebo

5% myristyl nicotinate(nicotinic acid derivative)

Increases skin thicknessPromotes epidermal differentiationDecreases TEWL

Jacobson EL et al. A topical lipophilic niacin derivative increases NAD, epidermal differentiation and barrier function In photodamaged skin. Exp Dermatol 2007; 16: 490-499.Bermudez Y et al. Nicotinic acid receptor abnormalities in human skin cancer. Plos One 2011; 6: 1-10.

Page 52: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

Vitamin B3: 4-5% Niacinamide Improves Acne, Photoaging and Melasma

50 subjects5% reduction in wrinkles vs control

Photoaging

27 subjects44% improved on niacinamide vs 55% hydroquinone

Melasma

Acne

80 subjectsImproved, not as much as 1% clindamycin

Page 53: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

Reduced brown spots

Before After

Page 54: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

My Approach to Vitamin B3

Sensitive skin and photoagingMoisturizer or spray for Acne

4% concentration, pH 4-7

Page 55: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

Antioxidant Collagen Vitamin C

Page 56: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

DOES MY PRODUCT WORK?Can Vitamin C be absorbed through the skin?

Page 57: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

Vitamin C Absorption Maximized at Concentration of 20% and pH Less Than 3.5

Pinnell et al. Topical L-ascorbic acid: Percutaneous absorption studies. Dermatol Surg 2001; 27:137-42.

Page 58: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

Ferulic Acid Stabilizes Vitamin C

– After 2 months, 0% of L-ascorbic acid remained

– >90% L-ascorbic acid present at 2 months when formulated with Ferulic acid

Pinnell et al. Dermatol Surg 2001; 27:137-42

Lin et al. JID 2005; 125:xi-xiii.

Austria R et al. J Pharm Biomed Anal 1997: 795-801.

Page 59: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

Concentration Matters for Collagen Stimulation

Increase collagen15% Vit C increased collagen I and III in skin biopsies by 20%-25% (p<0.06)

5% Vitamin C no effect in skin biopsies

Lin et al. JAAD 2003; 48:866-74.

Nusgens et al. JID 2001; 116: 853-859.Placzek M et al. JID 2004; 124: 304-307.

Page 60: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

Vitamin C Is Photoprotective

10% Vit C15% Vit C

Valacchi et al. Protective effects of topical vitamin C compound mixturesAgainst ozone-induced damage in human skin. JID 2017; 137: 1373-1375.

Increases sun protection

Lin et al. JID 2005; 125:xi-xiii.

Page 61: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

Clinical Studies:Vitamin C and Photoaging

• 3 studies, 10-20 subjects, 1 RCT

• Improvement statistically significant, but variable

Traikovich SS. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999; 125; 1091-8.

Fitzpatrick et al. Dermatol Surg 2002; 28: 231-236.

Humbert 2003. Exp Dermatol 2003; 12: 237-244.

Page 62: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

My Approach to Vitamin C

• Photoprotective effects>morning

• Dark bottle, small opening

• Ideal pH 3.5 (sting) > not for sensitive skin

• Concentration in 10-15% range

• Formulation with ferulic acid may be helpful

Page 63: Cosmeceuticals: A review of the scientific evidence

Should I Use This Product?What does the science support?

NO

• Formaldehyde

• Fragrance

• Methylisothiazone (MI)

• Methylchloroisothiazolinone (MCI)

YES

• Retinol or Retinaldehyde

• Niacinamide or nicotinic acid

• Ascorbic acid