cost efficient eval of a child with neurodevelopmental disabilities-ndd january 2014 (10)

Upload: monsalg2502

Post on 03-Jun-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/12/2019 Cost Efficient Eval of a Child With Neurodevelopmental Disabilities-NDD January 2014 (10)

    1/32

    Cost Effective Evaluation of a Child WithNeurodevelopmental Disabilities (NDD)

    Kenton R. Holden, M.D.

    Professor of Neurosciences (Neurology) & PediatricsMedical University of South Carolina

    Charleston, South Carolina

    Senior Clinical Research NeurologistGreenwood Genetic CenterGreenwood, South Carolina

    Tegucigalpa, Honduras

    January 31, 2014

  • 8/12/2019 Cost Efficient Eval of a Child With Neurodevelopmental Disabilities-NDD January 2014 (10)

    2/32

    Neurodevelopmental Disabilities (NDD)

    Disclosures:1. NIH Funding R01s re: ID Etiologies 2010-15, and

    Neuronal Gene Regulatory Elements with Epilepsy2012-2016.

    2. Smile Foundation: Co-PI for Pilot Funding 2013-2014;Assessment of Brain Structures and Tracts in X-LinkedMCT8 Gene Abnormalities Using MRI.

    3. Pediatric Neurology Consultant at the GreenwoodGenetic Center, Greenwood, SC.

    4. My favorite canvas briefcase was given to me at AES2000 by Abbott Labs (Depakote / Depakene).

    Holden K 01/31/14

  • 8/12/2019 Cost Efficient Eval of a Child With Neurodevelopmental Disabilities-NDD January 2014 (10)

    3/32

    Neurodevelopmental Disabilities (NDD)

    I. Characteristics:

    A. Common problem: About 100,000 born/yr;

    2 to 3% of all children < 6-yrs-old

    B. Etiologies heterogeneous, but childrens delayssimilar - many of whom have intellectualdisabilities (ID)

    C. Chronic disorder without prolonged plateauor regression in skillsD. Frequent referral to Pediatrics, Neurology, & Genetics

    Holden K 01/31/14

  • 8/12/2019 Cost Efficient Eval of a Child With Neurodevelopmental Disabilities-NDD January 2014 (10)

    4/32

    Neurodevelopmental Disabilities (NDD)

    I. Graphic Representation of Childhood Development

    (A)5

    4

    Developmental 3Skills

    (Years)

    2

    1

    1 2 3Chronological Age (Years)

    (B)

    (C)

    (D)

    (E)

    4 5

    Holden K 01/31/14

  • 8/12/2019 Cost Efficient Eval of a Child With Neurodevelopmental Disabilities-NDD January 2014 (10)

    5/32

    Neurodevelopmental Disabilities (NDD)

    I. Characteristics: (continued)A. Cognition

    NOTE: Many reports use IQ [or developmental quotient (DQ)] of 50-69 as mildimpairment, and IQ or DQ

  • 8/12/2019 Cost Efficient Eval of a Child With Neurodevelopmental Disabilities-NDD January 2014 (10)

    6/32

    Neurodevelopmental Disabilities (NDD)

    I. Characteristics: (continued)

    A. Significant documented disturbance in two ormore developmental domains( 2 std. dev. below the mean for age)

    Cognitive (intellect)

    Motor (gross and/or fine)

    Speech/languageBehavioral/Social

    Activities of daily living

    Holden K 01/31/14

  • 8/12/2019 Cost Efficient Eval of a Child With Neurodevelopmental Disabilities-NDD January 2014 (10)

    7/32

    Neurodevelopmental Disabilities (NDD)

    I. Characteristics Summary:

    A. DOMAINS:

    Single: Cognitive / intellectual disability (ID)...formerly mental retardation (MR);

    gross motor delay / cerebral palsy (CP)Multiple: Neurodevelopmental disabilities (NDD)

    B. FINAL DIAGNOSIS relies on a careful and detailed history(pedigree), observational and direct examination (OFC,fundi, etc.), appropriate psychological testing, andlaboratory investigations.

    C. SECOND VISIT is an integral part of the diagnostic

    assessment.Holden K 01/31/14

  • 8/12/2019 Cost Efficient Eval of a Child With Neurodevelopmental Disabilities-NDD January 2014 (10)

    8/32

    Neurodevelopmental Disabilities (NDD)

    II. Why Evaluate? (mostly Class III evidence,lack of therapies, low yield, availability,invasiveness, costs, etc.)

    A. Treatments are evolvingB. Prognosis is evolving

    C. Management of related disorders

    D. Risk of reoccurrence (screening)

    E. Limits additional unnecessary testing

    F. Empowers family to plan, network, etc.Holden K 01/31/14

  • 8/12/2019 Cost Efficient Eval of a Child With Neurodevelopmental Disabilities-NDD January 2014 (10)

    9/32

    Summary: Neurodevelopmental Disabilities (NDD)1. Obtain a detailed history and examination (...includes birth/neonatal OFC & current OFC)

    2. Refer for auditory and ophthalmologic screening

    3. Consider metabolic studies/T4if universal newborn screening not done.

    4. If history of suspected seizures or epilepsy syndrome, obtain EEG

    5. Consider screening for a language disorder or autism

    6. Is there a close family member with NDD (e.g., sibling, aunt/uncle, first cousin, etc.):

    A. Due to a known metabolic, genetic, or structural nervous system disorder?

    B. Unexplained NDD?

    (A.)/(B.)---- Yes(A.) Obtain specific test(s)

    for that disorder

    (B.) Obtain microarrayand Fragile X

    (A.)/(B.) ---- No

    7. Are there features suggesting a specific diagnosis?

    If tests C. Are there historical or physical findings (e.g. dysmorphic features) to

    are (-) suggest Down, Fragile X, Rett syndrome, other neurogenetic disorders, or

    hypothyroidism?

    D. Are there historical (intrapartum asphyxia, neurobehavioral, etc.), orphysical findings (microcephaly, cerebral palsy, focal findings), or

    seizures (infantile spasms (IS); partial) to suggest CNS injury ormalformation?

    E. Does the child have any identifiable risk factors for excessiveenvironmental/lead/other exposure as per established current guidelines?Yes No (F.) but plateau and/or regression in milestones evident

    (C.) (D.)

    Specific Brain MRI

    test(s) for preferred

    that to CT scandisorder

    (E.)

    Blood

    Lead

    level,

    etc.

    (F.)

    Stepwise evaluations forNeurodegenerative

    Disease.

    Holden K 01/31/14

  • 8/12/2019 Cost Efficient Eval of a Child With Neurodevelopmental Disabilities-NDD January 2014 (10)

    10/32

    Neurodevelopmental Disabilities (NDD)

    III. Evaluation

    1. Obtain a detailed history & exam; however, not allNDD genetic d/o have syndromic FHx or exam.

    2. Auditory and ophthalmologic screening

    3. Metabolic studies, T4/TSH if universalnewborn screening not done

    4. EEG only if history of suspected seizuresor an epileptic syndrome5. Screen for autism prn

    NOTE: No single set of laboratory tests is indicated

    in all cases. Holden K 01/31/14

  • 8/12/2019 Cost Efficient Eval of a Child With Neurodevelopmental Disabilities-NDD January 2014 (10)

    11/32

    Neurodevelopmental Disabilities (NDD)

    Electroencephalography:

    Holden K 01/31/14

  • 8/12/2019 Cost Efficient Eval of a Child With Neurodevelopmental Disabilities-NDD January 2014 (10)

    12/32

    Neurodevelopmental Disabilities (NDD)

    III. Evaluation: (continued)

    A. If close family relative with NDD due to

    known cause, obtain specific test (plasmaamino acids, lactate / pyruvate, ammonia,ceruloplasmin, transferrin, urine organicacids, Fragile X)

    B. If close family relative with NDD due tounexplained cause, obtain a microarrayand Fragile X.

    Holden K 01/31/14

  • 8/12/2019 Cost Efficient Eval of a Child With Neurodevelopmental Disabilities-NDD January 2014 (10)

    13/32

    Neurodevelopmental Disabilities (NDD)

    III. Evaluation: (continued)

    C. Are there features suggesting a specificdiagnosis?Are there significant historical or physical

    findings, e.g. Down, Fragile X, Rett,Angelman, other neurogenetic d/o,hypothyroidism, etc.?...then obtainspecific test.

    Holden K 01/31/14

  • 8/12/2019 Cost Efficient Eval of a Child With Neurodevelopmental Disabilities-NDD January 2014 (10)

    14/32

    Neurodevelopmental Disabilities (NDD)

    Dx: ?? Dx: ?? Dx: ??

    Holden K 01/31/14

  • 8/12/2019 Cost Efficient Eval of a Child With Neurodevelopmental Disabilities-NDD January 2014 (10)

    15/32

  • 8/12/2019 Cost Efficient Eval of a Child With Neurodevelopmental Disabilities-NDD January 2014 (10)

    16/32

    Neurodevelopmental Disabilities (NDD)

    Dx: ?? Dx: ?? Dx: ??

    Holden K 01/31/14

  • 8/12/2019 Cost Efficient Eval of a Child With Neurodevelopmental Disabilities-NDD January 2014 (10)

    17/32

    Neurodevelopmental Disabilities (NDD)

    Dxs: Fragile XHolden K 01/31/14

  • 8/12/2019 Cost Efficient Eval of a Child With Neurodevelopmental Disabilities-NDD January 2014 (10)

    18/32

    Neurodevelopmental Disabilities (NDD)

    III. Evaluation: (continued)D. Are there features suggesting a specific

    diagnosis?

    Are there historical (intrapartum,

    neurobehavioral, etc.) or physicalfindings (microcephaly*, CP, focalfindings) or epilepsy [Infantile Spasms

    (IS); partial sz] to suggest brain injury ormalformation?...then obtain brain MRI(preferred to CT).

    *Reference #8: Rollins, JD et al., J Peds 2010;156:907 Holden K 01/31/14

  • 8/12/2019 Cost Efficient Eval of a Child With Neurodevelopmental Disabilities-NDD January 2014 (10)

    19/32

    Neurodevelopmental Disabilities (NDD)

    2 mo old HM with NDD and IS

    Dx: ??Holden K 01/31/14

  • 8/12/2019 Cost Efficient Eval of a Child With Neurodevelopmental Disabilities-NDD January 2014 (10)

    20/32

    Neurodevelopmental Disabilities (NDD)

    Dx: MSUD Holden K 01/31/14

  • 8/12/2019 Cost Efficient Eval of a Child With Neurodevelopmental Disabilities-NDD January 2014 (10)

    21/32

    Neurodevelopmental Disabilities (NDD)

    2 yo WF with NDD &partial epilepsy

    Request MRIs: ??DX: ??

    5 yo WM with NDD& partial epilepsy

    Holden K 01/31/14

  • 8/12/2019 Cost Efficient Eval of a Child With Neurodevelopmental Disabilities-NDD January 2014 (10)

    22/32

    Neurodevelopmental Disabilities (NDD)

    T1-sagittalDx: ??

    T1-axial

    Holden K 01/31/14

  • 8/12/2019 Cost Efficient Eval of a Child With Neurodevelopmental Disabilities-NDD January 2014 (10)

    23/32

    Neurodevelopmental Disabilities (NDD)

    2 yo WF 5 yo WMNDD & partial epilepsy NDD & partial epilepsy

    T1-sagittal T1-axial

    Dx: Epidermal Nevus syndrome Holden K 01/31/14

  • 8/12/2019 Cost Efficient Eval of a Child With Neurodevelopmental Disabilities-NDD January 2014 (10)

    24/32

    Neurodevelopmental Disabilities (NDD)

    III. Evaluation: (continued)E. Does the child have any identifiable risk

    factors for excessive environmental exposures,infections, etc., per established guidelines?

    If identifiable, obtain iron, lead, HIV testing,etc., prn.

    Holden K 01/31/14

  • 8/12/2019 Cost Efficient Eval of a Child With Neurodevelopmental Disabilities-NDD January 2014 (10)

    25/32

    Summary: Neurodevelopmental Disabilities (NDD)1. Obtain a detailed history and examination (...includes birth/neonatal OFC & current OFC)

    2. Refer for auditory and ophthalmologic screening

    3. Consider metabolic studies/T4if universal newborn screening not done.

    4. If history of suspected seizures or epilepsy syndrome, obtain EEG

    5. Consider screening for a language disorder or autism

    6. Is there a close family member with NDD (e.g., sibling, aunt/uncle, first cousin, etc.):

    A. Due to a known metabolic, genetic, or structural nervous system disorder?

    B. Unexplained NDD?

    (A.)/(B.)---- Yes

    (A.) Obtain specific test(s)for that disorder

    (B.) Obtain microarrayand Fragile X

    (A.)/(B.) ---- No

    7. Are there features suggesting a specific diagnosis?

    If tests C. Are there historical or physical findings (e.g. dysmorphic features) to

    are (-) suggest Down, Fragile X, Rett syndrome, other neurogenetic disorders, or

    hypothyroidism?

    D. Are there historical (intrapartum asphyxia, neurobehavioral, etc.), orphysical findings (microcephaly, cerebral palsy, focal findings), or

    seizures (infantile spasms (IS); partial) to suggest CNS injury ormalformation?

    E. Does the child have any identifiable risk factors for excessive

    environmental/lead/other exposure as per established current guidelines?

    Yes No (F.) but plateau and/or regression in milestones evident

    (C.) (D.)

    Specific Brain MRI

    test(s) for preferred

    that to CT scandisorder

    (E.)

    Blood

    Lead

    level,

    etc.

    (F.)

    Stepwise evaluations forNeurodegenerative

    Disease.

    Holden K 01/31/14

  • 8/12/2019 Cost Efficient Eval of a Child With Neurodevelopmental Disabilities-NDD January 2014 (10)

    26/32

    III. Evaluation : F. Evaluation of Neurodegenerative Disorders of Childhood with Cognitive Decline (Dementia)

    (1) Screen for disorders that are potentially treatable orhave genetic implications - Rule out:

    Yes

    (A) Systemic Illness or Intoxicant (C) Hypothyroidism(B) Increased Intracranial Pressure (D) Metabolic Disease

    No YesVisceromegaly? Abnormalities ofSkin and / or Hair

    No

    Elements of Hurler Brain MRI with Brain MRI with Eye

    (12) Menke Disease(13) Fabry Disease

    (14) Biotinidase Deficiency(15) Cockayne Syndrome Type I(16) Cerebrotendinous Xanthomatosis

    (17) Glycosylation Disorders

    Dysmorphic ? Yes

    No

    Urine Screen forReducing Substances

    Positive

    Phenotype

    No

    (7) Disorders of Peroxisomal BiogenesisZellweger Syndrome

    Neonatal Adrenoleukodystrophy

    Yes

    Urine Screen forMucopolysaccharides

    NoDemyelination orDysmyelination?

    Yes

    Macrocephaly?Yes

    of the Tiger Sign? No

    Yes

    (28) PantothenateKinase-AssociatedNeurodegeneration

    Yes

    Brain MRI with SymmetricalLesions in Basal Ganglia /Thalamus / Brainstem

    No

    OphthalmologyConsult

    Negative

    (2) Galactosemia(3) Fructose Intolerance

    Bone MarrowAspirate For

    Gaucher Cells

    Infantile Refsum Disease

    Positive

    (8) Mucopolysaccharidosis

    Negative

    Urine Screen forOligosaccharides

    Negative

    No (18) Alexander Disease(19) Canavan Disease

    Microcephaly?Yes

    No

    (1) Organic / Amino Acid Disorders

    (14) Biotinidase Deficiency(23) Mitochondrial Disorders

    (Leigh Syndrome, etc.)

    (29) Huntington Disease(30) Wilson Disease

    NoPathology Pathology

    See Table 2

    Seizures asPositive

    MPS I - HurlerMPS II - Hunter

    MPS III - Sanfilippo Positive

    (20) AcquiredImmunodeficiencySyndrome

    ProminentSymptom?

    (4) Gaucher DiseaseNegative MPS VII - Sly (11) Mucolipidosis II

    Multiple Sulfatase Deficiency Seizures as

    Yes Prominent Symptom?

    (9) OligosaccharidosisMannosidosis I (17) Glycosylation Disorders No

    No

    Yes

    (23) Mitochondrial Disorders(31) Lesch-Nyhan Syndrome(5) Sandhoff Disease

    (6) Niemann-Pick Disease Fucosidosis ISialidosis IIGalactosialidosis

    (10) GM1Gangliosidosis Type I

    (21) Krabbe Disease(22) Subacute Sclerosing

    Panencephalitis (SSPE) (23) Mitochondrial Disorders

    (23) Mitochondrial Disorders (24) Pelizaeus-Merzbacher Disease(25) Metachromatic Leukodystrophy

    (26) Adrenoleukodystrophy(27) Leukoencephalopathy with

    Vanishing White Matter

    (17) Glycosylation Disorders

    (23) Mitochondrial Disorders(29) Huntington Disease(32) Rett Syndrome

    (33) GM1GangliosidosisType II

    See Reference #7: Goldstein EM, Holden KR, Chapter 51 in Maria BLs text book, 2009. Holden K 01/31/14

  • 8/12/2019 Cost Efficient Eval of a Child With Neurodevelopmental Disabilities-NDD January 2014 (10)

    27/32

    Neurodevelopmental Disabilities (NDD)References:

    1. Shevell M, et al: Practice parameter: evaluation of the child with global developmental delay.Neurology 2003; 60:367-380.

    2. Shaffer LG: American College of Medical Genetics guideline on the cytogenetic evaluation of the

    individual with developmental delay or mental retardation. Genetics in Medicine 2005; 7:650-654.

    3. Moeschler JB, Shevell M, and the Committee on Genetics: Clinical Genetic Evaluation of the ChildWith Mental Retardation or Developmental Delays. Pediatrics 2006; 117:2304-2316.

    4. Paciorkowski AR and Fang M: Chromosomal microarray interpretation: What is a child

    neurologist to do? Pediatr Neurol 2009; 41:391-398.

    5. Ashwal S, et al: Practice Parameter: Evaluation of the child with microcephaly (an evidence-basedreview). Neurology 2009; 73:887-897.

    6. Holden KR and Lyons MJ: Chapter 62, Microcephaly-Acquired. In: Maria BL, ed. Current

    Management in Child Neurology. 4th Edition. Shelton, CT: PMPH/BC Decker, Inc, 2009:421-428.

    7. Goldstein EM and Holden KR: Chapter 51, Neurodegenerative Disorders. In: Maria BL, ed. Current

    Management in Child Neurology. 4th Edition. Shelton, CT: PMPH/BC Decker, Inc, 2009:322-336.

    8. Rollins JD, Collins JS, and Holden KR: US head circumference growth reference charts: Birth to 21years. Jour Pediatr 2010; 156:907-913.

    9. Michelson DJ, et al: Evidence Report: Genetic and metabolic testing on children with globaldevelopmental delay. Neurology 2011; 77:1629-1635.

    Holden K 01/31/14

  • 8/12/2019 Cost Efficient Eval of a Child With Neurodevelopmental Disabilities-NDD January 2014 (10)

    28/32

    Holden K 01/31/14

  • 8/12/2019 Cost Efficient Eval of a Child With Neurodevelopmental Disabilities-NDD January 2014 (10)

    29/32

    Holden K 01/31/14

  • 8/12/2019 Cost Efficient Eval of a Child With Neurodevelopmental Disabilities-NDD January 2014 (10)

    30/32

    Holden K 01/31/14

  • 8/12/2019 Cost Efficient Eval of a Child With Neurodevelopmental Disabilities-NDD January 2014 (10)

    31/32

    Holden K 01/31/14

  • 8/12/2019 Cost Efficient Eval of a Child With Neurodevelopmental Disabilities-NDD January 2014 (10)

    32/32

    Neurodevelopmental Disabilities (NDD)

    Acknowledgements:

    1) Patti Broome & Suzan White, Admin Assts. at GGC.

    2) All my patients, their parents, and my instructors forteaching me the ever evolving subject of childhoodNDD.

    Thank you!

    Questions???Holden K 01/31/14