costing concepts laura hamrick joe hepworth kenneth holmes beygum kahn peter kelleher professor...
TRANSCRIPT
COSTING CONCEPTS
Laura HamrickJoe HepworthKenneth HolmesBeygum KahnPeter Kelleher
Professor Jason CadeApplied Management AccountingColorado Technical University
EEC Potential Costing Methods
• Full Costing/ Absorption Costing• Variable Costing• Target Costing• Life-Cycle Costing• Activity-Based Costing
Full Costing/Absorption Costing
Accumulates fixed and variable costs associated with a production process and portions them out to individual products in inventory.
Used to record the value of inventory in financial statements.
Full Costing/Absorption Costing Benefits
Allows the product to absorb the full range of fixed and variable costs into the overhead.
Costs are not seen as expenses, and they remain in inventory as assets until the inventory is sold; at that point, they are charged to the cost of goods sold.
Allows overhead accounts to absorb heavy or unexpected production costs until the volume ratchets up.
How EEC Would Apply Full CostingProject and Forecast EEC’s allocation
of funds to cover the variable and fixed costs that comprise the manufacturing overhead. The costs’ valuation will remain in the inventory until the products are sold.
Over absorb materials’ rising cost during peak demand periods and under absorb ebbing material cost during low demand periods.
Variable Costing
Separates the fixed costs from variable costs.
Fixed costs are expensed as a period cost.
Only the variable manufacturing costs are captured in the product cost.
Variable Costing Potential BenefitsEase of use for managementAide in decision making for production
levelProvides contribution marginAssists with management
performance.
How EEC Would Apply Variable CostingUse this method for high volume
productionUse the contribution ratio as decision
making toolAdjust production levels based on
contributionFocus on sales of products to match
the production levels
Target Costing
Target costing ◦ Determines the market price requirement, then
subtracts the target profit to arrive at the target cost, then develops a prototype that can be profitably made for the maximum target cost.
◦ Formula for Target Costing Anticipated selling price – Mandated profit
Industries most applicable for◦ Companies that compete by continually issuing a
stream of new or upgraded products into the market place (consumer goods).
◦ Target costing is an excellent tool for planning a suite of products that have high levels of profitability.
Target Costing Potential Benefits
Achieve greater cost efficiencyProactive approach to cost
managementOrients ECC toward its customersBreaks down department barriersFoster’s employee awareness and
empowermentFoster partnerships with suppliersEncourages production of cost
effective productsReduced time to marketImproves global competitiveness
How EEC Would Apply Target CostingConduct researchCalculate maximum costDetermine target costEngineer the productOngoing activitiesShelf if necessaryMore precise review approach
Life-Cycle Costing
Tracks, analyzes, and interprets the costs occurred over a product’s life time
Products tend to have -◦ High costs in their earlier phases (Development,
Intro, Growth)◦ Low costs as product nears end of life-cycle
(Maturity & Decline)Phases of Life-Cycle Costing
◦ Development◦ Introduction◦ Growth◦ Maturity◦ Decline
Life-Cycle Costing Potential BenefitsPlanning / ForesightBetter grasp of product expectationAware that new product development
will be neededKeeps companies relevant in the
market & industryIncreased advertisingBetter budgetingIncrease in research and development
How EEC Would Apply Life-Cycle Costing
Develop new products while previous products are in early introduction phase
Modifications to current products in order to increase sales revenues and profit
Budget for product advertisementConduct consumer surveys of
popularity of productUnderstand when life-cycle begins to
dropUnderstand need for new innovation in
timely manner
Activity-Based Costing
Assigns costs to activities based on the resources used in the production process
Direct approach to allocating overhead costs in the production process
Two Stages of Allocation◦ Allocation to Activities◦ Allocation to Production
Activity-Based Costing Benefits
More accurate costing of products/services, customers, SKUs, distribution channels.
Better understanding overhead.Easier to understand for everyone.Utilizes unit cost rather than just total cost. Integrates well with Six Sigma and other continuous
improvement programs.Makes visible waste and non-value added activities.Supports performance management and scorecardsEnables costing of processes, supply chains, and
value streamsActivity Based Costing mirrors way work is doneFacilitates benchmarking”
Identify activities in the production processClassify each activity according to the cost
hierarchy Identify and accumulate total costs of each activity Identify most appropriate cost driver or each activityCalculate total units of the cost driver relevant to
each activityCalculate the activity rate Apply the cost of each activity to product base
How EEC Would Apply Activity-Based Costing
CONCLUSIONBased on the five costing methods target costing is the best approach:• Target costing is most appropriate• Each product assigned a team and
continually reduces cost and updates the product.
• Price, profit and cost are fixed.• Requires all aspect of production to be
cost efficient.• Makes all departments part of the
process by breaking down department barriers.
• EEC would use market research to develop product line, making them more competitive.
References
Activity-Based Costing - ABC. (2015). Retrieved from Investopedia: http://www.investopedia.com/terms/a/abc.asp
Advantages and disadvantages of variable costing. (2014). Retrieved from Accounting For Management :
http://www.accountingformanagement.org/advantages-and-disadvantages-of-variable-costing/
Ahmed, S. (2014). Advantages, Disadvantages and Limitations of Activity Based Costing (ABC) System. Retrieved from
http://www.accounting4management.com/limitations_of_activity_based_costing.htm
Cade, J. (2015, January 23). Applied Managerial Accounting [live chat]. Retrieved from Colorado Technical University,
ACCT614-1501A-04 : Applied Managerial Accounting: https://campus.ctuonline.edu
Colorado Technical University. (2015). Cost Behavior Patterns and Concepts.{Presentation}Retrieved February 2nd,
2015. From: https://campus.ctuonline.edu/courses/ACCT614/p2/hub1/7376.pdf
Cromwell, J. (2015). What Are the Two Stages of Allocation in Activity-Based Costing? Retrieved from
http://smallbusiness.chron.com/two-stages-allocation-activitybased-costing-34760.html
Farid, S. (2015). Target Costing Approach To Pricing. Retrieved from Accounting4Management.com:
www.accounting4management.com>Costing
References
Johnson, R. (2015). Traditional Costing Vs. Activity-Based Costing. Retrieved from
http://smallbusiness.chron.com/traditional-costing-vs-activitybased-costing-33724.html
Leahy, T. (1998, January 1). The Target Costing Bull's-eye, Part One of a Series/ BPM. Retrieved from
www.businessfinancemag.com./bpm/target-costing-bullseye-part-one-series
Malonis, J. A. (Ed.). (2000). Encyclopedia of Business (2nd ed.). Farmington Hills, MI: Gale Group, Inc.
http://skillport.books24x7.com/toc.aspx?bookid=50321
Management Accounting. (n.d.) What is Life Cycle Costing? Retrieved February 2nd, 2015. From: http://managerial-
accounting.blogspot.com/2012/06/what-is-life-cycle-costing.html
N.A. (2015). Target Costing. Retrieved from AccountingTools.com: www.accountingtools.com/target-costing
Variable costing versus absorption costing. (2014). Retrieved from Accounting For Management :
http://www.accountingformanagement.org/variable-vs-absorption-costing/