could a lack of staff diversity be contributing to the bme ... · the attainment gap in 2018,...
TRANSCRIPT
Could a lack of staff diversity be contributing to the BME attainment gap within Birmingham
School of Art?
4186 Words
Contemporary and Historical Contexts
ART6133-A-S1-2019/0
Selina Sagnia
S14138518
1
Foreword
Here’s a picture of my sister and I looking like undertakers in training. She’s older, Louise, but
even by then I’d outgrown her. Adults would assume she was younger and of course, that always
made me feel victorious. I think it’s 1996, we’re stood outside a Cathedral in Manchester
pretending it’s not freezing. I remember losing my balance just before this; the poor grip of
pretty shoes failing fast beneath me. We smiled to our mother and held our dolls proudly.
22 years later my daughter clutches a doll that looks identical, Elsa, a fair skinned princess from
the billion pound franchise Frozen. Perhaps that’s why now, this picture is tough to look at. It
was taken at a time I began understanding what it meant to be Black, to not be the colour of a
protagonist. Disney never wanted me, nor did heros and happy endings. I was the colour of
trouble, the weakest link, the supporting role. My value was nothing and by 5, I understood this.
2
As I navigated childhood a glass ceiling built its home above me, and still, it loyally keeps me
company today. There are moments I’m certain it’ll leave, but it doesn't - it’s stubborn like that.
It stays with me, disrupting my sense of self and worth. And as I enter the School of Art, looking
upon the all white staff that inspire me, it likes to remind me it was right all along. And
sometimes, I believe it.
3
Contents
Foreward………………………………………………………………………………...2-3
Introduction
The Attainment Gap…………….……..…………..………………………………….…..5 Language & Definitions…………………………………….…………………………….6 Critical Learning…………..…………………………………………………………….7-8 Student Diversity……...….…….……………………………………………………...9-10 Staff Diversity…………………………………………………….………..………....11-12 Argument………………………………………………………………………………...13
Belonging at Birmingham School of Art
Being Understood……………………………………..……………………………...14-15 The Curriculum & Environment………………………………………………..…….16-17 Case Studies…………………………………….………………………………………..18
Findings
Conclusion...……………………………………………....…………………….........19-20 Recommendations………………………………………………………………………..20 Appendix………………………………………………………………………………....21 Bibliography….………..………………………………………………………………...22
4
The Attainment Gap
In 2018, Birmingham City University published an Access and Participation Plan to ‘‘support
success’’ within 5 identified student groups. Their aim, ‘‘to minimise or remove the barriers to
under-represented or disadvantaged students attending university and succeeding once there’’
(BCU, APP, 2018;1). BME students were, and still are, one of five groups identified. They make
up 52% of BCU’s student population: Asian (29%), Black (16%), Mixed (6%), Other (2%) and
each year, are outperformed by their white peers (BCU, APP, 2019;5). This is not a unique
symptom of BCU, unfortunately, this performance is seen across most UK Universities and has
been coined ‘The Attainment Gap’. The attainment gap typically measures BME retention, grade
outcome and employment once graduating. Again, all these see BME students fall behind their
white counterparts (ECU, 2017).
In the last decade, the UK has seen a surge in BME enrolment. Since 2007, BAME students have
increased by over 50% anchoring 22.7% of the UK’s student population (ECU, 2017). During
this time, pivotal research published by Broecke & Nicholls (2007) revealed that even once
controlling BME variables, such as age, subject and prior attainment, the gap still persists. This
study informed new approaches of conducting BME research, shifting away from the deficient
attributes of BME students and towards pedagogical ideologies (Alexander & Ardey, 2015).
Today, we see a very public pressure for Universities to understand what creates these disparities
and take action on catalysts that come directly from themselves as institutions (Sellgren, K.
2019)
5
Language & Definitions
● Within my research, ‘attainment’ will refer to averages in grade outcome and withdrawal
from study. I will not be focusing on employment outcome or data.
● At times I will use acronyms ‘BSOA’ and ‘BCU’ to speak of Birmingham School of Art
and Birmingham City University.
● Minority students will be described using the widely adopted acronym ‘BME’ (Black,
and minority ethnic). Another variation of this term finds itself within my research as
‘BAME’ (Black, Asian and minority ethnic). Both terms include the same pool of
enthncities and generally refer to a non-white hertiage. A preference of term is chosen by
author or institutional body, which is why both appear interchangeably within minority
research. Limitations of this definition are seen within ‘Critical Themes’(Advance Higher
Education, 2019).
● For the purpose of my research, ‘diverse staff’ will refer to BME academics. I will not
observe other diverse attributes such as gender, sexual orientation, etc.
● The role of a BME academics may be referred to as ‘Tutor’ or ‘Lecturer’.
● At times Universities may also be referred to as ‘Institutions’.
6
Critical Learning
I have identified several important themes within researching the BME attainment gap at BSOA:
1. Firstly, its true complexity; an agreement within studies the ‘gap’ manifests from several
influences before and during higher education (Dhanda, 2010; NUS & Universities UK,
2019; Singh, 2009; Steveson et al., 2019) Therefore, the factors I have chosen to integrate
by no means serve as a complete indication of all contributing factors to BSOA’s
attainment gap.
2. Secondly, there is criticism the word BME plays a problematic role in developing an
accurate and more sophisticated understanding of minority needs (Singh, 2009). Office
for Students (2018) described, ‘‘within every ethnic group there is a subgroup of
individuals who are more disadvantaged or underrepresented in higher education than
others in the group’’(OFS, 2018; 7). For example, 2017 saw 53% of Black students
graduate with a 2:1 or higher, however, 66% of Asian students achieved this (ECU,
2017). This 13 % difference is diluted when statics combine to form an overarching BME
percentage; a more thorough observation of demographics within BME’s will need to
continue to close this gap successfully (Singh, 2009). Additionally, these acronyms draw
emphasis to ‘visible’ minorities with the potential to exclude those marginalised in white
communities (Advance Higher Education, 2019). I am conscious, with this in mind, that I
have still chosen to look at BME research broadly. A decision I have made in order to
collect a robust amount of minority data to inform my writing. By doing this, I
acknowledge my research will not probe specific identities of a minority and instead,
attempt to thread commonalities between all BME’s.
3. BSOA student and staff records have proved difficult to obtain. I have been unable to
gain attainment data for BSOA and have no reference for student and staff diversity other
than my own experience of BSOA and the verbal confirmation of an existing attainment
7
gap from senior figures. Because these are not appropriate references, I have chosen to
use averages in UK Arts & Design disciplines to ‘assume’ data for BSOA. I am aware
this is not best practice, however I feel this is reasonable given my limitations.
Furthermore, NUS & Universities UK (2019) stress the importance of transparent and
accessible diversity data - if this was implemented at BSOA, my difficulties would have
been avoided.
4. Lastly, the influence of my Black ethnicity and positioning as a current BSOA student;
together these acted as ignition towards attainment focused conversations at BSOA. As
attention grew around my research, students began approaching me to discuss race,
identity and their experiences at the school; a White student praising that I acted as a
‘‘conduit’’ for race relations in the School. These dialogues would start without
prompting, across all ethnicities, through email, the classroom and in passing. From this,
I draw reference to research by Dhanda (2010) demonstrating BME students play a vital
role in informing ways to improve their achievement and importance of safe spaces to
comfortably discuss issues of diversity (Berry & Loke, 2019; Universities, 2019).
Additionally, I am conscious research warns of the ethical implications of BME’s solely
tackling it’s Universities attainment gap. The Higher Education Policy Institute (2019)
reports concern it unfairly gives BME's responsibility to ‘fix’ the gap allowing
institutions to be less proactive (HEP, 2019; 24)
8
Student Diversity
Birmingham City University has a student population of 24,600 (HESA, 2019). Within this, their
School of Art (BSOA) teaches traditional and contemporary Art practises between their Fine Art
and Art & Design courses. As the attainment gap predicts, Art practices see White students
outperform BME’s each year (HEA, 2018). In 2017, 79% of white students received a first
within ‘Creative Art & Design’ practices vs 63.4% of BME students (HEA, 2018; 144). As
explained within my ‘Critical Themes’ I will be assuming this attainment for BSOA.
Over 3 years The Higher Education Academy commissioned a ‘What Works?’ programme
(Thomas, 2012) with participation from 22 institutions. The programme aimed to understand
approaches that improved attainment through the evaluation of case studies. Across all
institutions, the findings demonstrated one unanimous output; a sense of belonging was critical
to retention and grade outcome. Something the HEA has since named ‘vital’ for success and
within this, identified staff as key facilitators (HEA, 2015; 2). The ‘What Works?’ conclusive
report describes belonging as; the knowledge one’s identity is not only accepted, but valued,
included and encouraged, students see their identity and beliefs embedded within their learning
and institutional environment (Thomas, 2012; 12-13). Without this, a conflict between a student's
background and that of the institution can lead to a deficit in attainment.
The same year, Stevenson (2012) published a report that more specifically looked at a BME’s
sense of belonging. Similarly to Thomas (2012) it found BME respondents desired to have their
identity acknowledged within their institution and a failure to do so became a likely detractor to
engagement and attainment. From this, the suggestion of an inclusive “non-white” and
“non-western” curriculum was recommended (Stevenson, 2012; 18)
Umbachs (2006) research into ‘Faculty Of Colour’ published quantitative evidence that indicates
BME staff can provide this ‘sense of belonging’ to BME students. His data found BME staff
contributing a broader range of pedagogical learning than White staff; their teaching more often
including the diversity and identity of students. Although Umbachs research has limitations
9
because of its US sampling, it is still widely accepted within UK BME reports to evidence the
value of a diverse staff population and their ability to create a BME centric environment
(AdvanceHE, 2018):
“Even after controlling for a number of individual and institutional characteristics, faculty of
color were more likely to interact with students, to employ active learning and collaborative
learning techniques, to create environments that increase diverse interactions, and to emphasize
higher-order thinking activities in the classroom.” (Umbrach, 2006; 337)
10
Staff Diversity
When NUS & Universities UK (2019) asked BME students: “Which of the following, if any, do
you believe are relevant contributing factors to any ethnicity attainment gaps at your
institution?’’ the highest scoring answer read ‘‘A lack of diverse senior leaders’’ chosen by 78%
of respondents (NUS & Universities UK, 2019; 25). Their report describes staff and senior
diversity as a detrator in BME student experience and subsequent contributor to the attainment
gap. This common hypothesis has erected through consistent reports of BME students speaking
of their want for visible role modelling and a discontent from being misunderstood by their tutors
- explicitly described as ‘White’ or ‘British’. This is evidenced within The NUS Race for
Equality (2011) report, where a Black respondent contributes, “There is a standard way of
thinking that is hegemonically White, and students from ethnic minorities either have to get with
the programme or do worse” (NUS, 2011;21).
BME academics are disportionate in comparison to their White counterparts, contributing to only
9.5% of academic staff; 5.5% of senior roles and 0.8% of institutional heads (ECU, 2018;131).
This is reflected within Art and Design practices where 93.7% of academics are white and 8.9%
(455 academics) are BME (ECU, 2018; 158). Again I will be assuming this data for BSOA.
(ECU, 2018; 158).
Similarly to attainment, there are many variables to this disparity with new waves of research
shedding light on racism and discrimination faced by BME staff (ECU, 2011). This
overwhelming white workforce is acknowledged within research by Dhanda (2009) that suggests
a BME’s sense of belonging is compromised by too few academic “black faces” (Dhanda,
2009;34)
These studies present a BME’s strong desire to learn from diverse staff for both visible and
curricula motivation (Dhanda, 2009). BME research respondents express positive feelings of
seeing themselves reflected in staff whilst also calling for a more diverse learning experience.
11
From this, we understand why HEA identify staff as ‘vital’ to belonging and see BME’s
confidently acknowledge this also. (Cousin & Cuerton, 2012) found that strong relationships
with a tutor enhances a BME’s trust towards an institution. They identified that negative
experiences with personal tutor, a feeling of oversight in culture and feeling of bias towards
white home students contributed to poor BME experiences in higher education. A continuation
of this is seen within the Neves & Hillman (2019) student experience survey that sees BME
students consistently more dissatisfied with teaching than their white peers and less trusting of
their institutions: “On each and every aspect, students from BME (Black and Minority Ethnic)
backgrounds are significantly less likely to be satisfied with teaching quality” (Neves, 2019)
The relations between BME students and staff builds their sense of belonging. However, it can
be argued that if that relationship fails to acknowledge, value or encourage a BME’s identity,
attainment will suffer. Diverse staff have the agency to not only provide these positive student
experiences but also enable non-BME staff to adopt more diverse approaches (Umbrach, 2006):
“a white member of a very diverse faculty is more likely than a white peer at a homogenous
institution to emphasize higher order cognitive activities and use diversity in their instruction”
(Umbrach, 2006; 338).
12
Argument:
Birmingham School of Art employs few BME staff, with a teaching body that is predominantly
White. I believe this workforce creates a bias towards the familiar needs, environments and
frameworks of White students, creating a space for BME’s to learn and White students to
flourish. By ‘flourish’ I am describing a feeling of belonging at BSOA and specifically, how this
emotional currency transfers to better tutor relationships, greater engagement with the curriculum
and positive responses to learning environments.
I will focus on how this embodies an Arts institution and conclude with recommendations BSOA
can adopt. I have chosen to investigate belonging within two themes:
1. Being Understood - I will consider the limitations of a BME student being taught by
predominantly White staff and Artists.
2. An Inclusive Environment - I will consider how course content can act as a detractor to BME
engagement and understand how diverse pedagogies can challenge this. I will consider the
importance of BME’s feeling valued within University, and argue that a lack of diverse staff fails
to facilitate this.
13
Being Understood
Orr, Yorke and Blair’s research in Art & Design pedagogies, view the subject as ‘‘co-production
and co-construction’’ (Orr, Yorke & Blair, 2014; 41). They describe both students and tutors
having equal “stakes” in the production of a students work. This concept finds itself within
Finnigan & Richards’ (2016) report of BME attainment in Art practices; “co-production”
becomes embedded with personal identities because the subject encourages individual responses
(Finnigan & Richards, 2016;6). This indicates that a students ability to successfully hold
on-going narratives about their personal beliefs and experiences become critical to their success,
revealing a relationship that cannot work without the other. This weaving of identity is evidenced
by Tangney (2013) who found Art & Design students created work with “emotional investment”
and “emotional consequence” (Tangney, 2013; 270). Her research revealed autobiographical
thinking within a students creation; an artwork created from “how the artist sees the world and
their place in it” (Tangney, 2013; 270). One student particpant explained, “it’s like taking your
clothes off in public” (Tangney, 2013; 270).
This “emotional consequence” was evidence when speaking to a current BSOA undergraduate
who explained a discomfort in storytelling their black narratives: “Sometimes during a tutorial, I
feel uncomfortable to fully express my ideas and speak freely. I have to translate them in a softer
way… that's why I like doing my research at home”. This student is experiencing a tension
between their identity and that of their tutor, peers and institution. Theuri (2018) writes about
this, describing it as a conflict between “master narratives” (Theur, 2018;159). The Institutional
space becomes the master, and the narrative of blackness, submissive, simply because
historically black people have always been:
‘marginalised communities, who must routinely manoeuvre within structures in society that are
oppressive, are subjected to master narratives such that they ‘internalise them to the extent that
members of marginalised communities begin to reproduce the master narratives’ (Theur,
2018;159).
14
It can be argued then, that if BME students attempt to explore their identity, they are producing
work at odds with the “master narrative”. We begin to see Yorke and Blairs idea of
“co-production” unravel as BME artists struggle to navigate dynamics of power and race when
their tutor is complicit within “master narratives”; a tension that at times results in catasphrophic
detriment and a BME surrenders their cultural authenticity. Sabri (2014) describes this conflict as
feeling “at odds with the tutors aesthetic sense” (Sabri, 2014; 20). Sabri’s case studies reveal that
once a conflict of culture manifests, students may choose any resolution’ to resolve it. An asian
participate explaining “sometimes you have to suck it up and do what they want” (Sabri, 2014;
20).
An intimate relationship between student and tutor finds itself at the core of Art & design
disciplines (Orr, Yorke & Blair, 2014). It is no wonder Sabri (2017) acknowledges this, naming
it “the most powerful factor in students creative and intellectual growth’’ (Sabri, 2007;2). Even
outside Artistic disciplines, evidence demonstrates tutors are crucial to development HEA
(2012). With this in mind we can see how a BME’s tension of valuing a tutors development but
simultaneously needing nurturing sympathetic to their identity can cause, distress, lack of
engagement and poor attainment. Thuer (2018) describes these “master narratives” as “a barrier
impeding participation in and experience of HE art and design for Black African students”
(Theur, 2018;161).
“I was continually confused, uncomfortable and at times disturbed. I would have discussions
with my mostly white peers and tutor - where discussions no longer felt like important
discussions for my artist development but rather history lessons on colonialism, post-colonialism
and black oppression” BSOA BME Graduate.
15
Curriculum & Environment
Discomfort in identity work may also explained through the Art curriculum and a lack of race
relations within. The NUS believe a “liberated” curriculum encourages these relations, helping
“students reflect on their identity and their place in society’’ (NUS, n.d; 4). However, according
to a 2011 NUS report, 43% of Black respondesnts felt their curriculum did not reflect issues of
diversity, equality, and discrimination and 32% felt unable to bring Black perspectives into
lectures, seminars, and tutorials (NUS Race for Equality, 2011;20). The report describes a
BME’s struggle with a eurocentric curriculum describing students felt: “frustration that courses
were designed and taught by non-Black teachers, and often did not take into account the diverse
backgrounds and views” (Race for Equality, 2011; 4)
Within Liberation, Equality, and Diversity in the Curriculum the NUS draw attention to the
meaning of curriculum, explaining it extends further than ‘what is taught in classroom or
assigned as reading but the entire way in which learning happens’ (NUS, 2015;2). Curriculum
should ensure every student, no matter their background, has inclusive and relevant learning
environments, with content that aligns with and encourages diverse learning and thinking (NUS,
2011; 2). A move towards this culturally inclusive style of teaching is more popularly known as
‘Decolonizing the Curriculum’. This means, racial dialogues no longer sit at the periphery of
curriculum but make up its fabric for all University students. The narratives surrounding race no
longer become a BME matter but collectively a student and institutional one. Inclusive
pedagogies, as David et al. (2010) explains, “involves creating individual and inclusive spaces,
developing student-centred strategies, connecting with students’ lives and being culturally
aware”. Because of this, all students needs are accommodated, increasing chances of academic
success.
16
Umbrach’s (2006) research into Staff diversity shows us BME staff have the agency to bring in
identity pedagogies and attract white staff to assume those values too: ‘‘the diversity of faculty
acts as a symbol of an institution’s commitment to diversity’’ (Umbrach’s, 2006; 338). He
explains that the visibility of BME staff helps embed a culture where diversity is ‘‘highly
valued’’ and in turn, staff align priorities of diversity within institutional goals.
Because BSOA has very few BME Staff, none muslim or black for instance, this diverse
‘role-modeling’ is not seen. Take for instance, an invitation to ‘Christmas tree decorating’
organised by BSOA staff in December 2019. All staff and students were invited to participate in
the decoration of this tree but there was no mention of Diwali just one month prior. Another
example can be seen in BSOA predominantly European field trips.
If BME staff are needed to ensure BME perspectives are embedded, BSOA is at conflict with
creating relevant and appropriate responses to its diverse cohorts. BSOA must act accordingly to
educate it’s staff of their limitations. However, research by Steveson (2012) demonstrates how
difficult this can be. Staff describe the tensions that arise when facilitating the needs of diverse
groups, race is often described as difficult to talk about and staff can feel attacked or blamed.
Staff speak of institutional changes being motivated from senior levels, and since ECU (2018)
shows us that only 5.5% of BME’s are at these ‘senior levels’ this creates barriers in motivations
being diversely aligned.
17
Case Studies:
1. Shades of Noir, Safe Space Crits (UAL)
Founded in 2009, ‘SON’ helps create inclusive curriculum and diverse pedagogies within
its UAL’s Art practices. Although originally at UAL, Shade of Noir now advise other
Arts educators and regularly feature as examples of good practice within BME research
(Finnigan & Richards, 2016). ‘SON’ have created ‘Safe Space Crits’ for BME artists to
comfortably express their work in an environment they do not feel conflicted with. These
crits are only facilitated by BME Artists and are easily bookable online.
2. Tell Us About It’ (UAL)
Instead of focusing on negative detractors, UAL collects experiences from high achieving
BME’s in Art, within a project they call ‘Tell Us About It’. By doing this it uses a BME
student centric approach to inform UAL’s teaching and methodology. (Finnigan, 2009).
18
Conclusion
I believe the research I have gathered provides a strong body of evidence to support my
hypothesis. A lack diverse staff means teaching pedagogies may fail to resonate with BME
students, creating barriers to participation and engagement; at times, this may be diverse in
visibility or diverse in pedagogical teaching. A BME students experience of positive and relevant
learning at BSOA may be limited because it’s white teaching demographic are unable to respond
to for-see cultural needs effectively. In turn, this curbs a BME’s sense of belonging and
ultimately their attainment.
It is thought that BME staff are able to disrupt repetitive pedagogies with inclusive teaching that
does not solely reward those with pre-existing ‘Cultural Capital’. BME Art narratives will draw
from their identity and so may bring sensitive topics that conflict with, or speak critically
towards BSOA’s eurocentric dominance. It can be argued that a BME student will experience
more anxiety holding a dialogue, when their tutor and institution emulate such dominance. By no
means am I suggesting White tutors are ill-equipped to effectively teach BME students, however,
when it comes to exploring cultural narratives tutors must be conscious of their limitations and
provide support accordingly; it must promote a self reflective attitude to question traditional and
non-traditional teaching pedagogies while accelerating its diverse priorities.
BSOA must reflect on its environment where ‘coloured’ staff take on domestic roles as ‘the
help’, like it’s cleaners and security guards. If this continues a BME student will never see
themselves reflected in staff and assume the school holds no priority to diversity.
Within my research I understand the importance of not seeing BME’s as one homogeneous
group. It is essential that research continues to disassemble these acronyms to gather a richers
understanding of cultural and individual needs.
19
The potential of BME academics is an exciting and challenging one. BME research continues to
indicate the value of diverse teaching for the pluralistic world we live in today. However, as said
within Alexander and Arday (2015) the only way real change will galvanize is if BME students
and academics are invited to sit at the dinner table instead of simply being on the menu.
Recommendations:
● Offering BME students who explore identity work crits and feedback with BME
academics and Artists (outsourced if necessary).
● Creating an inclusive ‘culture calendar’ that informs staff of religious or cultural dates
e.g. Ramadan that may see their students fast, and therefore may need additional support
during this time.
● Less eurocentric aligned field trips, workshops and curriculums.
● Establishing on-going feedback from high BME achievers.
● An honest and transparent dialogue of attainment, diversity and strategies within the
school from first year of student induction.
● An in house BME support role.
● An honest approach of staff limitations directly addressed to students.
● Rethinking policy - joining the Race Equality Charter.
● Ensuring every advertised position has a diverse shortlist (recruiting headhunter to
facilitate if necessary).
● Setting a safe environment for staff and BME students to speak about difficulties.
20
Appendix
Both Birmingham School of Art BME quotes have been permissioned by each contributor.
21
References
1. Adams, R. (2018) UK universities making slow progress on equality, data shows. The Guardian. 7 September. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/education/2018/sep/07/uk-university-professors-black-minority-ethnic [Accessed November 1 2019].
2. Advance Higher Educatin (2019) Use of language: race and ethnicity. Available at: https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/guidance/equality-diversity-and-inclusion/using-data-and-evidence/use-of-language-race-ethnicity#BAME [Accessed January 2 2019]
3. Advance Higher Education (2019) Staff statistical report. [pdf] Advance Higher
Education. Available at: https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2019-05/2018-06-ECU_HE-stats-report_staff_v5-compressed.pdf. [Accessed January 5 2019].
4. Advance Higher Education (2019) Student statistical report. [pdf] Advance Higher Education. Available at: https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2019-05/2018-06-ECU_HE-stats-report_students_v5-compressed.pdf. [Accessed January 5 2019].
5. Advance Higher Education (Advance HE) 2018. Does diversity of staff impact student outcomes in higher education?. [pdf] Advance Higher Education. Available at: https://www.lfhe.ac.uk/download.cfm/docid/98DB7C15-83D3-4648-91AFB36CCC217E2C [Accessed 10 November 2019].
6. Akel, S. (2019) Insider-Outsider: The Role of Race in Shaping the Experiences of Black and Minority Ethnic Students. [pdf] London: Goldsmith University London. Available at: https://www.gold.ac.uk/media/docs/reports/Insider-Outsider-Report-191008.pdf [Accessed Decemeber 10 2019].
7. Alexander, C. and Arday, C. (2015) Aiming Higher Race, Inequality and Diversity in the Academy. [pdf] Runnymede. Available at: https://www.runnymedetrust.org/uploads/Aiming%20Higher.pdf [Accessed November 17 2019].
22
8. Arts Council England (2012) Equality, Diversity and the Creative Case. [pdf] Arts Council England. Available at: https://www.artscouncil.org.uk/sites/default/files/download-file/Diversity_report_1718_hi-resV3.pdf Accessed [December 20 2019].
9. BCU (2019) Access and Participation Plan (APP) 2020/21 to 2024/25. [pdf]
Birmingham: BCU. Available at: https://bcuassets.blob.core.windows.net/docs/BirminghamCityUniversity_APP_2020-21_V1_10007140.pdf [ Accessed November 5 2019].
10. BCU (2019) Access Agreement 2018-19. [pdf] Birmingham: BCU. Available at: https://bcuassets.blob.core.windows.net/docs/access-agreement-18-19-birmingham-city-university-131533923979164155.pdf[ Accessed November 5 2019].
11. Berry, J. and Loke, G. (2011) Improving the degree attainment of Black and minority ethnic students. [pdf] Equality Challenge Unit. Available at: https://www.ecu.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/external/improving-degree-attainment-bme.pdf [Accessed December 11 2019].
12. Bhattacharyya, G. Ison, l. and Blair, M. (2003) Minority Ethnic Attainment and Participation in Education and Training: The Evidence. [pdf] Nottingham: Department for Education and Skills. Available at: http://www.ligali.org/pdf/minority_ethnic_attainment.pdf [Accessed December 12 2019].
13. Birmingham City University (2015) Equality and Diversity in Employment. [pdf].
Birmingham: Birmingham City University. Available at https://bcuassets.blob.core.windows.net/docs/equality-and-diversity-in-employment-policy-131737997843142519.pdf [Accessed 2 November 2019].
14. British Association for Counselling and Psychotherapy (2018) Supporting black British university students: Understanding students' experiences with peers and academic staff. [pdf] BACP. Available at https://www.bacp.co.uk/bacp-journals/university-and-college-counselling/september-2018/supporting-black-british-university-students/ [Accessed 3 November].
15. Broecke, S. Nicholls, T (2007) Ethnicity and Degree Attainment. [pdf] For Department for Education and Skills. Available at: https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/6846/1/RW92.pdf [Accessed 10 November 2019]
23
16. Brown, M. (2016) Number of BAME arts workers must improve, says Arts Council report. The Guardian. 12 December. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/dec/12/number-of-minority-arts-workers-must-improve-arts-council-england Accessed [December 20 2019]
17. Connor, H. Tyers, C. Modood, T. Hillage, J. (2014) Why the Difference? A Closer Look at Higher Education Minority Ethnic Students and Graduates. [pdf] Nottingham: For Department for Education and Skills. Available at: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/media-library/sites/ethnicity/migrated/documents/educationreport.pdf [Accessed 10 November 2019]
18. Cooney, R. (2019) We are 'treading water' on diversity, says Arts Council England. Thirdsector, 12 February. Available at:https://www.thirdsector.co.uk/treading-water-diversity-says-arts-council-england/management/article/1525562 [Accessed December 20 2019].
19. Cousin, G. Cuerton, D (2010) Professor Glynis Cousin & Dr Debra Cuerton. [pdf]. For
The Higher Education Academy. Available at: https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/projects/worlverhampton_2010_disa_final_report.pdf [Accessed November 20 2019]
20. Curry, S. (2018) Why universities need to talk to black people about race. The Guardian.
30 August. Available at: https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/science/occams-corner/2018/aug/30/why-universities-need-to-talk-to-black-people-about-race [Accessed December 11].
21. Dhanda, M. (2010) Understanding Disparities in Student Attainment: Black and Minority
Ethnic Students’ Experience [pdf]. Wolverhampton: University of Wolverhaptom. Available at: http://www2.wlv.ac.uk/equalopps/mdsummary.pdf [Accessed November 10]
22. ECU (2009) The experience of black and Minority ethnic staff working in higher education. [pdf] Equality Challenge Unit. Available at: https://www.ecu.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/external/experience-of-bme-staff-in-he.pdf [Accessed December 1 2019].
23. ECU (2011) The experience of black and minority ethnic staff in higher education in
England. [pdf] London: Equality Challenge Unit. Available at:
24
https://www.ecu.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/external/experience-of-bme-staff-in-he-final-report.pdf [Accessed November 15 2019].
24. ECU (2017) Equality in higher education: students statistical report. [pdf] ECU.
Available at: http://blackbritishacademics.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/ECU-Students_report_2017_November2017.pdf [Accessed on November 10]
25. Elevation Networks Trust (2012) Race to the Top The Experience of Black Students in
Higher Education. [pdf] The Bow Group. Available at: https://www.bowgroup.org/sites/bowgroup.uat.pleasetest.co.uk/files/Race%2520to%2520the%2520Top%2520-%2520Bow%2520Group%2520-%2520Elevation%2520Networks%2520(April%25202012)_0.pdf [Accessed December 2 2019].
26. Equality Challenge Unity (2014b) Equality in Higher Education: Statistical Report 2014: Part 2: Students. Equality Challenge Unit. Available at: https://www.ecu.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/ECU_HE-stats-report_student_v19.pdf [Accessed November 31].
27. Finnigan, T. (2008) ‘Tell Us About It’ Student Voices in Creative Practice. [pdf]
University of the Arts London. Available at: http://www.studentstories.co.uk/assets/pdfs/20100310153604_2003409879.pdf [Accessed December 3].
28. Finnigan, T. Richards, A. (2015) Embedding equality and diversity in the curriculum: an
art and design practitioner’s guide. For Higher Education Academy. Available at: https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/sites/default/files/resources/eedc_art_and_design_online.pdf [Accessed December 5 2019].
29. Finnigan, T. Richards, A. (2016) Retention and attainment in the disciplines: Art and
Design [pdf]. For Higher Education Academy. Availavle at: https://s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/assets.creode.advancehe-document-manager/documents/hea/private/ug_retention_and_attainment_in_art_and_design2_1568037344.pdf [Accessed November 21 2019]
30. GOV UK (2019) Participation in the arts. Available at:
https://www.ethnicity-facts-figures.service.gov.uk/culture-and-community/culture-and-heritage/adults-taking-part-in-the-arts/latest#main-facts-and-figures [Accessed November 29 2019].
25
31. Hatton, K. Herrington, E. Freedman, K. Goodley, D. Hickey-Moody, A. Theuri, S.
McMillan, M. Donszelmann, B. Stevenson, C. and Broadhead, S. (2015) Towards an Inclusive Arts Education. Institute of Education Press
32. HEA (2015) Framework for student access, retention, attainment and progression in
higher education. [pdf] The Higher Education Academy. Available at: https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/downloads/studentaccess-retention-attainment-progression-in-he.pdf [Accessed December 10 2019].
33. HEA (2015) Framework for student engagement through partnership. [pdf] The Higher
Education Academy. Available at: https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/sites/default/files/downloads/student-enagagement-through-partnership-new.pdf [Accessed December 10 2019].
34. HESA (2019) Where do students study?. Available at: https://www.hesa.ac.uk/data-and-analysis/students/where-study [Accessed 11 November 2019]
35. Higher Education Policy Institute (2019) The white elephant in the room: ideas for
reducing racial inequalities in higher education. [pdf] Oxford: Higher Education Policy Institute. Avilable at https://www.hepi.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/The-white-elephant-in-the-room-ideas-for-reducing-racial-inequalities-in-higher-education.pdf[Accessed December 20 2019].
36. Human Rights Commission (2010) Equal Opportunities Act 2010. Available at:
https://www.humanrightscommission.vic.gov.au/home/our-resources-and-publications/brochures/item/download/8214_33e5aff9792e41d390f0f11bd435497d [Accessed November 22 2019].
37. Sellgren, K. (2019) Universities told to tackle race attainment gap. The BBC, 2 May.
Available at: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-48121840 [Accessed November 2 2019].
38. Leader, T. Abrams, D. and Rutland, A. (2009) An experimental test of the impact of
Black role model messages. [pdf] For Department for Communities and Local Government. Available at: https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/10518/1/1281347.pdf.
26
39. Neves, J. (2019) The Student Academic Experience Survey sheds light on the importance of teaching in contributing to a positive academic experience. Available at: https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/news-and-views/Student-Academic-Experience-Survey-2019 [Accessed December 5 2019]
40. Neves, J. and Hillman, N. (2019) Student Academic Experience Survey. [pdf] For Advance Higher Education. Higher Education Policy Institute. Available at: https://www.hepi.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Student-Academic-Experience-Survey-2019.pdf [Accessed 10 November 2019]
41. NUS ‘Hate Crime Interim Report’. [pdf] National Union of Students. Available at: https://www.nus.org.uk/Global/NUS_HateCrimeReport_web.pdf [Accessed December 15 2019]
42. NUS (2008) The Race Relations (Amendment) Act and education. Available at:
https://www.nus.org.uk/en/news/the-race-relations-amendment-act-and-education/ [Accessed 22 November 2019]
43. NUS (2011) RACE FOR EQUALITY. [pdf] London: National Union of Students.
Available at: https://www.nus.org.uk/PageFiles/12350/NUS_Race_for_Equality_web.pdf [Accessed on 15 November 2019].
44. NUS (2015) Race Matters. [pdf] London: National Union of Students. Available at:
https://www.nus.org.uk/PageFiles/12238/Race%20Matters%20Report%202015.pdf [Accessed December 20].
45. NUS (2015) Reaching Home. [pdf] National Union of Students. Available at:
https://www.nus.org.uk/PageFiles/12238/Reaching%20Home.pdf [Accessed December 12 2019].
46. NUS (n.d) Liberation, Equality, and Diversity in the Curriculum [pdf]. NUS. Avialable
at: https://www.sparqs.ac.uk/upfiles/Liberating%20the%20curriculum.pdf [Accessed November 31 2019]
47. NUS and Universities UK,(2019) BLACK, ASIAN AND MINORITY ETHNIC STUDENT
ATTAINMENT AT UK UNIVERSITIES: #CLOSINGTHEGAP. [pdf] Available at: https://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/policy-and-analysis/reports/Documents/2019/bame-student-attainment-uk-universities-closing-the-gap.pdf [Accessed November 7 2019]
27
48. Office for Students (OFS). (n.d) Topic briefing: Black and minority ethnic (BME)
students [pdf] Office for Students. Available at: (https://www.officeforstudents.org.uk/media/145556db-8183-40b8-b7af-741bf2b55d79/topic-briefing_bme-students.pdf [Accessed 22 November 2019]
49. Orr, S. Yorke, M. Blair, B. (2014) The answer is brought about from within you’: a student-centred perspective on pedagogy in art and design. The International Journal of Art & Design Education. 33(1). Available at: https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.ezproxy.bcu.ac.uk/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1476-8070.2014.12008.x [Accessed 1 December 2019]
50. Sabri, D. (2017) Students’ Experience of Identity and Attainment at UAL. [pdf]
University of The Arts London. Available at: http://ualresearchonline.arts.ac.uk/14370/1/year%204%20report%20-%20%20final.pdf [Accessed November 27 2019].
51. Singh, G. (2011) A synthesis of research evidence. Black and minority ethnic (BME)
students’ participation in higher education: improving retention and success. [pdf] Available at: https://s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/assets.creode.advancehe-document-manager/documents/hea/private/bme_synthesis_final_1568036653.pdf [Accessed November 10 2019]
52. Stevenson, J. (2012) Black and minority ethnic student degree retention and attainment.
[pdf] The Higher Education Academy. Available at: https://s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/assets.creode.advancehe-document-manager/documents/hea/private/bme_summit_final_report_1568036653.pdf [Accessed November 10 2019].
53. Stevenson, J. O'Mahony, J. Khan, O. Ghaffar, F. and Stiell, B. (2019) Understanding and
overcoming the challenges of targeting students from under-represented and disadvantaged ethnic backgrounds. [pdf] Report for Office for Students. Available at: https://www.officeforstudents.org.uk/media/d21cb263-526d-401c-bc74-299c748e9ecd/ethnicity-targeting-research-report.pdf [November 25 2019].
54. Tangney, Sue (2014) Student-centred learning: a humanist perspective. Teaching in
Higher Education, 19(3). Available at: (https://www-tandfonline-com.ezproxy.bcu.ac.uk/doi/pdf/10.1080/13562517.2013.860099?needAccess=true [Accessed December 22 2019]
28
55. The Higher Education Academy (2015) Framework for student engagement through
partnership. [pdf]. The Higher Education Academy. Available at: https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/sites/default/files/downloads/student-enagagement-through-partnership-new.pdf [Accessed December 10 2019]
56. The Higher Education Academy (HEA). (2012) Art and Design National Student Survey
Discipline Report. [pdf] The Higher Education Academy. Available at: https://s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/assets.creode.advancehe-document-manager/documents/hea/private/resources/art_and_design_nss_discipline_report_final_1568036825.pdf [Accessed December 17 2019]
57. Theuri, S. (2016) Black African students and the art and design education space:
Narratives of journeys to Higher Education art and design. Pd.D. Thesis. The University of Salford. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b38a/865016b048d05eed88240005114712937ced.pdf [Accessed November 16 2019]
58. Thomas, L. (2012) Building student engagement and belonging in Higher Education at a
time of change: final report from the What Works? Student Retention & Success programme. [pdf] For The Higher Education Academy. Available at https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/what_works_final_report_0.pdf [Accessed November 20 2019]
59. Umbach, P. (2006) The contribution of Faculty of colour to the Undergraduate
Education. Research in Higher Education, 47(3). Available at: https://link-springer-com.ezproxy.bcu.ac.uk/content/pdf/10.1007/s11162-005-9391-3.pdf [Accessed November 30 2019]
60. University of Oxford (2014) Race, Ethnicity and the Student Experience. In: UCAS Conference 2014/2015. University of Oxford. Available at:http://www.admin.ox.ac.uk/media/global/wwwadminoxacuk/localsites/uashomepages/uasconference/presentations/Improving_the_experience_of_BME_students.pdf [Accessed December 28].
61. University of the Arts London (2018) Decolonising the Arts Curriculum: Perspectives on
Higher Education. [e-book] University of The Arts London. Available through: https://issuu.com/susanbubble/docs/final_decolonising_zine2.compressed [Accessed November 20 2019]
29
62. Weale, S (2019) UK universities' BME staff less likely to hold top jobs. The Guardian. 15 October. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/education/2019/oct/15/uk-universities-bme-staff-less-likely-to-hold-top-jobs [Accessed November 7 2019]
63. Woodfield, R. (2014) Undergraduate retention and attainment across the disciplines
[pdf]. For Higher Education Academy. Available at:
(https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/sites/default/files/resources/undergraduate_retention_and
_attainment_across_the_disciplines.pdf [Accessed December 1 2019]
30