could the future of claims be touchless?...touchless claims handling: in this process, a claim is...

1
Traditional Fast Track Touchless Claims Handling Could the Future of Claims be Touchless? We asked senior executives across 24 P&C carriers to share their views about the future of claims automation and its integration into their claims processing workflow to manage non-complex claims. Claims processes were divided into four categories and carriers were set into three segments. LexisNexis and the Knowledge Burst logo are registered trademarks of RELX Inc. Other products and services may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies. Copyright © 2017 LexisNexis. To download the Future of Claims: Touchless Claims whitepaper, visit lexisnexis.com/futureofclaims RISK SOLUTIONS Claims Handling Processes Forward Leaning Semi-Forward Leaning Traditional Carriers Traditional: A process where an adjuster goes into the field, inspects the vehicle or home and prepares an estimate. Fast Track: An expedited claims handling process with minimal insurance employee involvement. An example would be a direct repair claim. Virtual Claims Handling: A process where a customer or vendor captures damage via photos or streaming video; a claims adjuster conducts the damage assessment remotely. Touchless Claims Handling: In this process, a claim is reported electronically. Technology is used to capture damage or invoices, run a system audit, and if the claim meets approved criteria, the claim is paid electronically. Virtual Claims Handling Respondents expect the use of self-service options will increase over the next 5 years, driven initially by tech-savvy millennials, but eventually adopted by others. FNOL Pre-filled App Claims Adjudication Significantly Somewhat Not at all Telematics Data Being Used in Claims Investigations Data & Analytics Being Used to Automate Minor Injury Claims Benefits Decreased cycle times and increased processing speed Decreased LAE and the ability to reallocate human resources to more complex claims A more seamless customer experience and increased satisfaction Respondents who are already utilizing virtual claims processes are more open to a touchless claims approach. 27 % 73 % No Yes Fast Track Approach Users Traditional, Field Inspection Approach Virtual Handling Approach Users Are you considering or open to Touchless Claims Handling? 67 % 33 % No Yes Are you considering or open to Touchless Claims Handling? Heavily Manual .......................................................................................................................................... Fully Automated Progression Towards Claims Automation Touchless Claims Approach Did you have an accident? Need emergency assistance? Would you like to report a claim? Chosen for: Faster Cycle Times Reduced LAE Improved Customer Experience Resource Efficiencies Respondents are choosing Virtual Handling to enhance the customer experience. Less Customer Friction/Better Retention Benefits Experienced Benefits Experienced Reduced LAE Chosen for: Enhanced Customer Experience and Faster Cycle Times Fast Track Processing Virtual Claims Handling A v e r a g e C y c l e T i m e Traditional Approach Users Fast Track Approach Users Virtual Approach Users 54 % 54 % 42 % 46 % 42 % 21 % 33 % 46 % 38 % 71 % 29 % 8 % 8 % 4 % Respondents expressed increased customer satisfaction, decreased expenses, lower cycle times as benefits of claims automation. All respondents believe telematics data will be used in claims investigations within the next 5 years; most believe that data and analytics will be used to automate minor injury claims within the next 3 to 5 years. Respondents taking a more automated approach are experiencing significantly lower cycle times. 73 % 78 % 67 % Examining the claims handling landscape, all carriers use a Traditional Claims approach but the majority have implemented Fast Track and are beginning to implement a Virtual Handling approach. The Road to Touchless Claims 100% using Traditional, Field Inspection Approach Traditional, Field Inspection Approach 83% using Fast Track Approach Fast Track Approach 38% using Virtual Approach Virtual Approach A v e r a g e C y c l e T i m e A v e r a g e C y c l e T i m e Average 3 - 4 Touches 10 - 15 DAYS 2 - 3 DAYS Average 1 - 2 Touches 4 - 6 DAYS Average 2 Touches Traditional Relies heavily on in-field inspectors for non-complex claims. May be using Fast Track, but not using or considering Virtual Claims Handling Semi-Forward Leaning Using traditional in-field and Fast Track. Also using or is considering Virtual Claims Handling Forward Leaning Using Fast Track and Virtual Claims Handling while also considering Touchless Claims Handling Significantly Somewhat Not at all

Upload: others

Post on 09-Oct-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Could the Future of Claims be Touchless?...Touchless Claims Handling: In this process, a claim is reported electronically. Technology is used to capture damage or invoices, run a system

TraditionalFast Track

Touchless Claims Handling

Could the Future of Claims be Touchless?We asked senior executives across 24 P&C carriers to share their views about the future of claims automation and its integration into their claims processing workflow to manage non-complex claims. Claims processes were divided into four categories and carriers were set into three segments.

LexisNexis and the Knowledge Burst logo are registered trademarks of RELX Inc. Other products and services may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies. Copyright © 2017 LexisNexis.

To download the Future of Claims: Touchless Claims whitepaper, visit lexisnexis.com/futureofclaims

RISK SOLUTIONS

Claims Handling Processes

Forward LeaningSemi-Forward LeaningTraditionalCarriers

Traditional: A process where an adjuster goes into the field, inspects the vehicle or home and prepares an estimate.

Fast Track: An expedited claims handling process with minimal insurance employee involvement. An example would be a direct repair claim.

Virtual Claims Handling: A process where a customer or vendor captures damage via photos or streaming video; a claims adjuster conducts the damage assessment remotely.

Touchless Claims Handling: In this process, a claim is reported electronically. Technology is used to capture damage or invoices, run a system audit, and if the claim meets approved criteria, the claim is paid electronically.

Virtual Claims Handling

Respondents expect the use of self-service options will increase over the next 5 years, driven initially by tech-savvy millennials, but eventually adopted by others.

FNOL Pre-filled App Claims Adjudication

Significantly Somewhat Not at all

Telematics Data Being Used in Claims Investigations

Data & Analytics Being Used to Automate Minor Injury Claims

BenefitsDecreased cycle times

and increased processing speed

Decreased LAE and the ability to reallocate human resources to

more complex claims

A more seamless customer experience

and increased satisfaction

Respondents who are already utilizing virtual claims processes are more open to a touchless claims approach.

27%

73%

No

Yes

Fast Track Approach Users

Traditional, Field Inspection

ApproachVirtual HandlingApproach Users

Are you considering or open to Touchless Claims Handling?

67%

33%No

Yes

Are you considering or open to Touchless Claims Handling?

HeavilyManual

.......................................................................................................................................... Fully AutomatedProgression Towards Claims Automation

Touchless Claims Approach

Did you have an accident?

Need emergency assistance?

Would you like to report a claim?

Chosen for: Faster Cycle Times

Reduced LAE Improved Customer Experience

Resource E�iciencies

Respondents are choosing Virtual Handling to enhance the customer experience.

Less Customer Friction/Better Retention

Benefits Experienced Benefits Experienced

Reduced LAE

Chosen for: Enhanced Customer Experience and Faster Cycle Times

Fast Track Processing Virtual Claims Handling

Aver

age

Cycle

Time

Traditional Approach Users

Fast Track Approach Users

Virtual Approach Users

54% 54%

42%

46%42%

21%

33%

46%

38%

71%

29%

8% 8%

4%

Respondents expressed increased customer satisfaction, decreased expenses, lower cycle times as benefits of claims automation.

All respondents believe telematics data will be used in claims investigations within the next 5 years; most believe that data and analytics will be used to automate minor injury claims within the next 3 to 5 years.

Respondents taking a more automated approach are experiencing significantly lower cycle times.

73% 78% 67%

Examining the claims handling landscape, all carriers use a Traditional Claims approach but the majority have implemented Fast Track and are beginning to implement a Virtual Handling approach.

The Road to Touchless Claims

100% using Traditional, Field Inspection Approach

Traditional, Field Inspection Approach

83% using Fast Track Approach

Fast TrackApproach

38% using Virtual Approach

VirtualApproach

Aver

age

Cycle

Time

Aver

age

Cycle

Time

Average 3 - 4 Touches

10 - 15DAYS

2 - 3DAYS

Average 1 - 2 Touches

4 - 6DAYS

Average 2Touches

TraditionalRelies heavily on in-field inspectors for non-complex claims. May be using Fast

Track, but not using or considering Virtual Claims Handling

Semi-Forward LeaningUsing traditional in-field and Fast Track. Also using or is considering

Virtual Claims Handling

Forward LeaningUsing Fast Track and Virtual Claims

Handling while also considering Touchless Claims Handling

Significantly Somewhat Not at all