counter claim.pdf

Upload: vladimir-sabarez-linawan

Post on 14-Apr-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/27/2019 Counter Claim.pdf

    1/4

    REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES

    NATIONAL CAPITAL JUDICIAL REGION

    METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURT

    Branch 1

    City of Quezon

    MR. MALLY VOGUEPlaintiff,

    Criminal Case No. 1-Versus- For: Qualified Theft

    MR. ARMANDO BACLAYANDefendant.

    x------------------------------------------x

    ANSWER WITH SPECIAL AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES

    AND COUNTERCLAIM

    NOW COMES, the defendant in the above entitled case, and to this Honorable

    Court most respectfully alleges:

    1. That the defendant admits the averment in paragraphs 1,2,3,5,6,7,8, and11 of the complaint. That (1) Plaintiff is of legal age and businessman

    and lives in the mentioned address in the complaint, and the HR

    manager of Awesome Surveillance & Security Stuff (ASSS), (2) That

    the defendant is also of legal age and a sales coordinator of ASSS. (3)

    That defendant the defendant failed to remit the money on the report towork order and the receipt of payment from Mr. Xavier. (4) That as a

    sales coordinator he is an important member of the company and

    regarding the previous case of appropriation condoned by company was

    agreed to be deducted from his salary.

    2. That the defendant denies the averment in paragraph 4 of the complaint.That the plaintiff had an agreement with the defendant to receive money

    in behalf of ASSS, though he avers that he had been given responsibility

    for the two (2) projects as evidenced in Annex C and D but, never did

    he have a personal agreement with the plaintiff.

  • 7/27/2019 Counter Claim.pdf

    2/4

    Page 2 of4

    3. That the defendant strongly denies that he received the noticementioned in paragraph 9 of the complaint.

    4. The defendant denies the allegation of the plaintiff that the ground forthe criminal action filed was the letter acknowledging the mistake sent

    by the defendant, as implied in paragraph 11 and 12 of the complaint,

    when such letter was sent to the HR department of the corporation after

    the first instance of appropriation of the money by the defendant, which

    is before his prolonged absence.

    By way of special and affirmative defenses, defendant avers:

    1. That he is in possession of the money and failed to remit the dues.2. That the defendant has no intention of not remitting the money

    demanded; and has no intention of abusing the confidence reposed to

    him as a sales coordinator of ASSS.

    3. That the defendants prolonged absence was due to the fact that he hasto urgently attend to his ailing grandmother in the province of Cagayan,

    and that the place was so remote, and to that effect communication was

    almost impossible.

    4. That the defendant ran out of money due to the medical expenses of hisailing grandmother and has to sojourn and do odd jobs there for a while

    in order to raise money to return to Manila, instead of just using the

    company money he is in possession of.

    By way of counterclaim, defendant alleges:

    1. That by virtue of this unwarranted act initiated by the plaintiff, thedefendant was forced to contract the services of counsel in the sum of

    P 20,000.00.

    2. That there were no sufficient grounds for termination of due to the factthat he was not given any notice to explain his failure to remit said

    money.

    3. That the complaint cannot prosper since itssine qua non element to wit,the grave abuse of confidence and intent to gain is absent, and that the

    plaintiff based his allegations upon unfounded fears.

  • 7/27/2019 Counter Claim.pdf

    3/4

    Page 3 of4

    WHEREFORE, it is respectfully prayed that the complaint be dismissed and

    Defendant be awarded the amount of P50, 000.00

    Other equitable reliefs are likewise prayed for.

    City of Quezon, Philippines, 18th of July, 2013.

    ATTY. JEREKKO A. CADORNAAttorney for the Defendant

    P.T.R. No. 6969 January 1, 2013 Manila

    IBP O.R. No. 7769 January 1, 2013 Manila

  • 7/27/2019 Counter Claim.pdf

    4/4

    Page 4 of4

    VERIFICATION

    IArmando Baclayan, subscribing under oath, hereby deposes and statesthat:

    I am the defendant in the instant case.

    I have read the foregoing answer and the allegations therein are true andcorrect of my own knowledge and/or based on the records on hand.

    ____________________Armando Baclayan

    Defendant

    JURAT

    SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to me, in the City of Quezon this 18th

    day of July, 2013 by, Armando Baclayan with Community Tax CertificateNo. 199212 issued at Quezon City on March 1, 2012

    NOTARY PUBLIC

    My Commission expires Dec. 31, 2013IBP No. 7969, 1/2/2013, Quezon City

    P.T.R. No.7770, 2/2/213, Quezon City

    Doc. No._____;

    Page No._____;Book No._____;

    Series of 20____.