Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 1

ACTSC221 Section 001 Blake William Peter Thomas

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 18, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 2, Just right: 28, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 15, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 15, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 18, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 12, Most of the time: 3, Often enough: 7, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 10

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 15, Interesting: 14, Not Interesting: 3, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 18, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 23, 75-90%: 2, 50-75%: 5, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 2

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 23, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 19, No opinion: 4

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 12, Helpful: 15, Not helpful: 4, No text required: 0, No opinion: 2

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 30, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 27, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 6, 3-6 hours: 22, 7-10 hours: 5, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

36% (33 of 92) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 2

ACTSC231 Section 001 Freeland R Keith

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 17, Good: 32, Satisfactory: 34, Unsatisfactory: 7, Very poor: 8, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 6, Somewhat too high: 27, Just right: 44, Somewhat too low: 12, Too low: 5, No opinion: 4

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 18, Good: 37, Satisfactory: 25, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 4, No opinion: 8

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 19, Good: 29, Satisfactory: 30, Unsatisfactory: 13, Very poor: 7, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 22, Good: 35, Satisfactory: 25, Unsatisfactory: 10, Very poor: 5, No opinion: 1

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 8, Most of the time: 13, Often enough: 15, Not often enough: 4, Never: 3, I did not seek help: 54

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 11, Interesting: 62, Not Interesting: 22, No opinion: 4

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 12, Good: 37, Satisfactory: 31, Unsatisfactory: 12, Very poor: 6, No opinion: 1

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 59, 75-90%: 21, 50-75%: 14, 25-50%: 2, < 25%: 2

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 17, Not helpful: 6, No work assigned: 72, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 10, Helpful: 33, Not helpful: 10, No printed course notes: 42, No opinion: 3

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 16, Helpful: 48, Not helpful: 20, No text required: 3, No opinion: 11

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 14, Somewhat too much: 35, Okay: 45, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 0, No opinion: 2

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 38, Somewhat too little: 8, Too little: 17, No opinion: 26

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 26, 3-6 hours: 43, 7-10 hours: 22, 11-15 hours: 5, > 15 hours: 3

46% (99 of 213) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 3

ACTSC231 Section 002 Mei Yuchen

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 13, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 7, Somewhat too high: 12, Just right: 22, Somewhat too low: 5, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 14, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 2

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 13, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 7, Good: 21, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 13, Most of the time: 7, Often enough: 7, Not often enough: 6, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 13

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 9, Interesting: 22, Not Interesting: 12, No opinion: 3

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 14, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 32, 75-90%: 8, 50-75%: 4, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 3, No work assigned: 29, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 5, No printed course notes: 15, No opinion: 4

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 14, Helpful: 24, Not helpful: 4, No text required: 2, No opinion: 2

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 7, Somewhat too much: 12, Okay: 23, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 26, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 2, No opinion: 8

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 13, 3-6 hours: 18, 7-10 hours: 8, 11-15 hours: 5, > 15 hours: 2

49% (46 of 94) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 4

ACTSC232 Section 001 Adcock James

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 15, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 4, Just right: 23, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 10, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 15, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 14, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 3, Most of the time: 5, Often enough: 9, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 10

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 9, Interesting: 16, Not Interesting: 2, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 14, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 22, 75-90%: 4, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 16, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 17, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 15, Not helpful: 6, No text required: 2, No opinion: 3

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 21, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 21, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 18, 7-10 hours: 8, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

31% (28 of 91) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 5

ACTSC331 Section 001 Cai Jun

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 17, Good: 21, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 12, Just right: 28, Somewhat too low: 4, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 13, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 15, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 4, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 17, Unsatisfactory: 7, Very poor: 4, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 8, Most of the time: 8, Often enough: 8, Not often enough: 3, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 20

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 10, Interesting: 28, Not Interesting: 5, No opinion: 4

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 12, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 41, 75-90%: 5, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 15, Helpful: 16, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 14, No opinion: 2

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 26, No opinion: 8

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 15, Not helpful: 5, No text required: 14, No opinion: 9

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 35, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 36, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 2, No opinion: 5

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 5, 3-6 hours: 30, 7-10 hours: 8, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 1

47% (47 of 101) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 6

ACTSC371 Section 001 Tan Ken S

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 8, Good: 25, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 7, Just right: 30, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 1, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 12, Good: 21, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 2

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 9, Good: 21, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 2

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 7, Good: 21, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 6, Most of the time: 11, Often enough: 11, Not often enough: 3, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 13

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 11, Interesting: 20, Not Interesting: 12, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 10, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 21, 75-90%: 14, 50-75%: 8, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 27, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 13, Not helpful: 4, No printed course notes: 15, No opinion: 5

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 20, Not helpful: 9, No text required: 1, No opinion: 3

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 9, Somewhat too much: 13, Okay: 18, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 23, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 2, No opinion: 8

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 4, 3-6 hours: 25, 7-10 hours: 9, 11-15 hours: 5, > 15 hours: 1

37% (44 of 119) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 7

ACTSC371 Section 002 Matheson Brenton James

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 1, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 5, Just right: 9, Somewhat too low: 4, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 5, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 0, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 2, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 1, Most of the time: 3, Often enough: 8, Not often enough: 5, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 3

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 6, Interesting: 10, Not Interesting: 4, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 2, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 7, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 7, 75-90%: 4, 50-75%: 4, 25-50%: 2, < 25%: 3

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 14, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 11, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 3, No text required: 1, No opinion: 1

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 15, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 8, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 3, No opinion: 6

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 6, 3-6 hours: 8, 7-10 hours: 5, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0

22% (20 of 93) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 8

ACTSC372 Section 001 Wood Peter J

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 31, Good: 25, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 12, Just right: 47, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 38, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 32, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 37, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 20, Most of the time: 11, Often enough: 10, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 20

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 21, Interesting: 37, Not Interesting: 4, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 37, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 52, 75-90%: 7, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 36, Helpful: 26, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 22, Helpful: 17, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 17, No opinion: 5

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 13, Helpful: 15, Not helpful: 8, No text required: 13, No opinion: 11

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 17, Okay: 44, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 56, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 7, 3-6 hours: 38, 7-10 hours: 16, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0

36% (62 of 174) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 9

ACTSC431/ACTSC831 Section 001 Weng Chengguo

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 23, Good: 21, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 11, Just right: 36, Somewhat too low: 6, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 26, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 30, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 10, Good: 22, Satisfactory: 17, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 20, Most of the time: 10, Often enough: 11, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 13

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 10, Interesting: 37, Not Interesting: 5, No opinion: 2

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 23, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 42, 75-90%: 10, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 15, Helpful: 20, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 18, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 21, Helpful: 19, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 12, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 13, Not helpful: 3, No text required: 24, No opinion: 10

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 38, Somewhat too little: 4, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 39, Somewhat too little: 4, Too little: 3, No opinion: 4

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 10, 3-6 hours: 25, 7-10 hours: 14, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 2

68% (54 of 79) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 10

ACTSC432/ACTSC832 Section 001 Cai Jun

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 14, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 2, Just right: 21, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 5, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 10, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 2, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 4, Most of the time: 5, Often enough: 3, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 12

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 7, Interesting: 13, Not Interesting: 4, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 6, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 22, 75-90%: 2, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 7, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 12, No opinion: 4

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 8, No opinion: 6

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 19, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 20, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 3

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 7, 3-6 hours: 9, 7-10 hours: 5, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 1

45% (24 of 53) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 11

ACTSC445/ACTSC845 Section 001 Saunders David

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 18, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 5, Somewhat too high: 16, Just right: 25, Somewhat too low: 6, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 20, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 12, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 9, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 19, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 16, Most of the time: 10, Often enough: 13, Not often enough: 7, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 7

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 15, Interesting: 24, Not Interesting: 11, No opinion: 3

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 23, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 42, 75-90%: 9, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 2, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 18, Helpful: 30, Not helpful: 5, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 17, Helpful: 27, Not helpful: 6, No printed course notes: 3, No opinion: 0

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 18, Not helpful: 4, No text required: 18, No opinion: 6

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 8, Somewhat too much: 14, Okay: 29, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 2, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 15, Okay: 34, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 23, 7-10 hours: 21, 11-15 hours: 5, > 15 hours: 3

54% (54 of 100) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 12

ACTSC446/ACTSC846 Section 001 Lemieux Christiane

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 20, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 6, Somewhat too high: 15, Just right: 19, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 21, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 21, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 17, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 13, Most of the time: 8, Often enough: 9, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 13

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 8, Interesting: 27, Not Interesting: 6, No opinion: 3

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 18, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 27, 75-90%: 12, 50-75%: 5, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 12, Helpful: 31, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 3, No printed course notes: 13, No opinion: 5

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 19, Not helpful: 5, No text required: 3, No opinion: 9

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 6, Somewhat too much: 13, Okay: 24, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 39, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 5, 3-6 hours: 22, 7-10 hours: 13, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 1

59% (45 of 76) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 13

ACTSC463 Section 001 Van Kooten Christopher John

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 6, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 6, Just right: 10, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 7, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 3, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 8, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 2, Most of the time: 0, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 12

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 4, Interesting: 9, Not Interesting: 5, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 5, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 12, 75-90%: 5, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 12, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 3, No opinion: 3

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 3, No opinion: 6

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 12, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 9, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 1, No opinion: 5

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 10, 3-6 hours: 5, 7-10 hours: 2, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 1

47% (18 of 38) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 14

ACTSC471 Section 001 Brisley Neil

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 2, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 0, Just right: 4, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 3, Good: 1, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 2, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 4, Good: 1, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 2, Most of the time: 1, Often enough: 0, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 2

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 4, Interesting: 1, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 4, Good: 1, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 4, 75-90%: 1, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 0

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 3, No opinion: 1

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 4, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 5, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 2, 7-10 hours: 1, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0

42% (5 of 12) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 15

ACTSC611 Section 001 Li Siu Hang

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 16, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 1, Just right: 14, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 17, Good: 1, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 17, Good: 1, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 16, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 11, Most of the time: 3, Often enough: 1, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 3

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 11, Interesting: 7, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 17, Good: 1, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 18, 75-90%: 0, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 15, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 12, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 1, No opinion: 0

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 5, No opinion: 3

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 13, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 2, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 16, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 7, 3-6 hours: 9, 7-10 hours: 2, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

86% (18 of 21) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 16

ACTSC612 Section 001 Tan Ken S

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 4, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 4, Just right: 7, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 4, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 2, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 3, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 4, Most of the time: 2, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 3

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 9, Interesting: 4, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 4, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 13, 75-90%: 0, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 0

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 10, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 0, No opinion: 0

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 6, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 10, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 3, 3-6 hours: 7, 7-10 hours: 3, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

62% (13 of 21) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 17

ACTSC613 Section 001 Zhu Mu

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 10, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 3, Somewhat too high: 3, Just right: 9, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 11, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 12, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 9, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 5, Most of the time: 4, Often enough: 0, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 6

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 9, Interesting: 6, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 10, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 14, 75-90%: 1, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 5, No opinion: 0

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 12, No opinion: 1

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 8, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 9, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 6, 3-6 hours: 8, 7-10 hours: 1, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

71% (15 of 21) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 18

ACTSC614 Section 001 Andrews Douglas William

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 2, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 6, Just right: 2, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 1, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 1, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 3, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 6, Most of the time: 1, Often enough: 3, Not often enough: 0, Never: 1, I did not seek help: 2

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 3, Interesting: 7, Not Interesting: 3, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 1, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 12, 75-90%: 1, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 5, No work assigned: 1, No opinion: 2

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 5, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 0, No opinion: 0

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 10, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 5, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 5, No opinion: 1

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 6, 3-6 hours: 5, 7-10 hours: 1, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0

62% (13 of 21) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 19

ACTSC615 Section 001 Andrews Douglas William

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 0, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 4, Just right: 5, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 4, Good: 1, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 1, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 2, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 6, Most of the time: 1, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 0, Never: 1, I did not seek help: 1

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 1, Interesting: 8, Not Interesting: 4, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 1, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 11, 75-90%: 2, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 3, No work assigned: 2, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 5, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 0, No opinion: 0

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 5, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 5, Somewhat too little: 4, Too little: 4, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 5, 3-6 hours: 7, 7-10 hours: 1, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

62% (13 of 21) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 20

ACTSC970/ACC770 Section 001 Li Bin

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 14, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 4, Just right: 15, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 13, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 13, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 11, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 10, Most of the time: 8, Often enough: 1, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 1

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 7, Interesting: 14, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 12, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 20, 75-90%: 0, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 12, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 0

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 3, No text required: 0, No opinion: 3

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 18, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 17, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 12, 7-10 hours: 4, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 2

50% (21 of 42) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 21

ACTSC972/ACC772 Section 001 Kolkiewicz Adam

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 9, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 3, Somewhat too high: 0, Just right: 8, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 10, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 9, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 9, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 6, Most of the time: 4, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 1

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 8, Interesting: 4, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 8, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 8, 75-90%: 3, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 2

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 2, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 2, No opinion: 0

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 7, No opinion: 0

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 11, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 13, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 9, 7-10 hours: 2, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

72% (13 of 18) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 22

ACTSC974/STAT974 Section 001 Wirjanto Tony

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 5, Good: 0, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 1, Just right: 5, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 6, Good: 1, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 5, Good: 0, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 5, Good: 0, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 6, Most of the time: 1, Often enough: 0, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 0

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 4, Interesting: 3, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 5, Good: 1, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 4, 75-90%: 2, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 0

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 0, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 1, No opinion: 1

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 3, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 4, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 4, 7-10 hours: 1, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 1

30% (7 of 23) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 23

AMATH231 Section 001 Vrscay Edward R

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 11, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 1, Just right: 12, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 10, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 6, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 10, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 10, Most of the time: 1, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 2

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 10, Interesting: 4, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 12, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 13, 75-90%: 2, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 1, No opinion: 0

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 5, No opinion: 1

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 13, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 13, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 10, 7-10 hours: 5, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

75% (15 of 20) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 24

AMATH250 Section 001 West Joseph John

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 20, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 7, Just right: 29, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 25, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 25, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 25, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 7, Most of the time: 9, Often enough: 10, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 14

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 11, Interesting: 23, Not Interesting: 5, No opinion: 2

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 25, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 32, 75-90%: 8, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 18, Helpful: 20, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 16, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 10, No opinion: 4

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 16, Not helpful: 6, No text required: 12, No opinion: 1

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 27, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 34, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 5, 3-6 hours: 31, 7-10 hours: 3, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 1

36% (41 of 115) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 25

AMATH250 Section 002 West Joseph John

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 22, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 4, Somewhat too high: 5, Just right: 25, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 21, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 23, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 27, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 13, Most of the time: 6, Often enough: 6, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 8

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 12, Interesting: 20, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 26, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 27, 75-90%: 7, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 15, Helpful: 19, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 11, No opinion: 5

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 10, No opinion: 6

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 25, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 28, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 4, 3-6 hours: 25, 7-10 hours: 4, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

34% (34 of 99) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 26

AMATH251 Section 001 Lamb Kevin G

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 5, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 1

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 5, Somewhat too high: 9, Just right: 11, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 9, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 4, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 5, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 6, Most of the time: 3, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 15

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 9, Interesting: 12, Not Interesting: 6, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 4, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 18, 75-90%: 7, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 15, Not helpful: 5, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 10, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 5, No printed course notes: 6, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 15, No opinion: 3

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 9, Okay: 13, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 6, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 14, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 5, 3-6 hours: 11, 7-10 hours: 7, 11-15 hours: 4, > 15 hours: 0

60% (28 of 47) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 27

AMATH271 Section 001 Waite Michael L.

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 13, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 2, Just right: 17, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 10, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 13, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 16, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 8, Most of the time: 5, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 6

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 12, Interesting: 8, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 14, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 18, 75-90%: 1, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 3, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 13, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 3, No text required: 0, No opinion: 0

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 17, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 14, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 3, 3-6 hours: 13, 7-10 hours: 2, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 1

70% (21 of 30) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 28

AMATH331/PMATH331 Section 001 Andre Robert

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 20, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 7, Just right: 19, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 18, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 14, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 19, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 15, Most of the time: 6, Often enough: 1, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 6

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 4, Interesting: 17, Not Interesting: 5, No opinion: 2

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 20, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 25, 75-90%: 3, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 13, Helpful: 15, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 15, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 4, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 22, No opinion: 3

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 9, Okay: 10, Somewhat too little: 4, Too little: 2, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 20, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 2, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 16, 7-10 hours: 11, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

29% (28 of 97) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 29

AMATH350 Section 001 Harmsworth David L

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 26, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 9, Just right: 24, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 24, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 23, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 27, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 15, Most of the time: 9, Often enough: 3, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 7

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 9, Interesting: 18, Not Interesting: 7, No opinion: 2

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 25, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 30, 75-90%: 4, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 19, Helpful: 17, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 12, Helpful: 13, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 6, No opinion: 5

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 3, No text required: 19, No opinion: 3

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 7, Somewhat too much: 12, Okay: 17, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 27, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 20, 7-10 hours: 12, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 1

32% (36 of 114) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 30

AMATH351 Section 001 Poulin Francis

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 12, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 6, Just right: 21, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 15, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 12, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 11, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 15, Most of the time: 6, Often enough: 3, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 5

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 7, Interesting: 19, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 2

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 12, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 24, 75-90%: 5, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 16, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 3, No printed course notes: 3, No opinion: 6

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 19, No opinion: 4

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 17, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 23, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 18, 7-10 hours: 8, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 1

71% (29 of 41) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 31

AMATH442 Section 001 Rhebergen Sander

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 6, Good: 1, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 1, Just right: 7, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 5, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 2, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 5, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 2, Most of the time: 5, Often enough: 0, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 1

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 5, Interesting: 3, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 6, Good: 1, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 6, 75-90%: 1, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 2, No opinion: 3

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 7, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 7, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 5, 7-10 hours: 1, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

80% (8 of 10) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 32

AMATH453 Section 001 Sivaloganathan Sivabal

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 4, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 3, Somewhat too high: 9, Just right: 1, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 7, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 5, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 5, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 3, Most of the time: 5, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 0

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 5, Interesting: 5, Not Interesting: 2, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 3, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 8, 75-90%: 4, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 4, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 3, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 0

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 9, No opinion: 0

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 2, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 5, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 4, 7-10 hours: 6, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 0

76% (13 of 17) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 33

AMATH456 Section 001 Siegel David

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 14, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 4, Just right: 26, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 15, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 13, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 14, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 6, Most of the time: 3, Often enough: 3, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 17

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 9, Interesting: 18, Not Interesting: 2, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 15, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 26, 75-90%: 3, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 18, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 5, No opinion: 5

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 21, No opinion: 4

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 26, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 28, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 19, 7-10 hours: 11, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

70% (30 of 43) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 34

AMATH463/AMATH663 Section 001 Stastna Marek M

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 5, Good: 1, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 1, Just right: 8, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 8, Good: 1, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 3, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 3, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 5, Most of the time: 1, Often enough: 0, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 3

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 5, Interesting: 4, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 6, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 9, 75-90%: 0, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 0

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 0, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 9, No opinion: 0

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 9, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 8, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 9, 7-10 hours: 0, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

60% (9 of 15) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 35

CO227 Section 001 Roh Patrick Young

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 3, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 4, Just right: 15, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 3, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 6, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 7, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 8, Most of the time: 3, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 4

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 2, Interesting: 12, Not Interesting: 3, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 5, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 8, 75-90%: 8, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 11, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 11, No opinion: 4

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 12, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 16, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 11, 7-10 hours: 3, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 0

40% (19 of 48) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 36

CO250 Section 001 Guenin Bertrand

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 17, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 4, Somewhat too high: 7, Just right: 26, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 20, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 13, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 17, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 9, Most of the time: 8, Often enough: 9, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 13

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 15, Interesting: 16, Not Interesting: 9, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 19, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 30, 75-90%: 7, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 24, Not helpful: 5, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 21, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 15, Helpful: 17, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 2, No opinion: 4

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 12, Okay: 24, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 9, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 21, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 3, 3-6 hours: 24, 7-10 hours: 10, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 0

40% (40 of 99) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 37

CO250 Section 002 Va vasis Stephen

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 8, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 6, Somewhat too high: 15, Just right: 13, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 14, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 10, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 12, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 9, Most of the time: 10, Often enough: 7, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 10

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 9, Interesting: 20, Not Interesting: 4, No opinion: 3

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 12, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 27, 75-90%: 8, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 14, Helpful: 17, Not helpful: 4, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 16, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 17, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 3, No opinion: 1

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 12, Okay: 19, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 12, Okay: 18, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 12, 7-10 hours: 20, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 1

42% (36 of 86) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 38

CO330 Section 001 Katz Eric

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 2, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 6, Just right: 5, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 3, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 3, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 5, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 1, Most of the time: 4, Often enough: 3, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 4

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 6, Interesting: 6, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 3, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 9, 75-90%: 3, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 0

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 0, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 10, No opinion: 0

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 8, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 8, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 4, 7-10 hours: 8, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

44% (12 of 27) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 39

CO342 Section 001 Richter R. Bruce

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 15, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 1, Just right: 16, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 15, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 2

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 12, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 14, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 4, Most of the time: 3, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 11

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 8, Interesting: 11, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 15, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 14, 75-90%: 3, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 6, No opinion: 7

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 0, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 14, No opinion: 4

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 16, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 17, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 3, 3-6 hours: 10, 7-10 hours: 7, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

50% (20 of 40) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 40

CO351 Section 001 Richter R. Bruce

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 4, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 4, Just right: 11, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 7, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 5, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 7, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 6, Most of the time: 2, Often enough: 1, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 5

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 8, Interesting: 6, Not Interesting: 2, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 4, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 14, 75-90%: 1, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 1, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 13, No opinion: 0

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 13, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 10, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 8, 7-10 hours: 6, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 2

40% (16 of 40) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 41

CO370 Section 001 Fukasawa Ricardo

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 8, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 8, Just right: 14, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 9, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 8, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 8, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 7, Most of the time: 1, Often enough: 6, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 10

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 6, Interesting: 12, Not Interesting: 5, No opinion: 2

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 8, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 19, 75-90%: 4, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 16, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 5, No printed course notes: 2, No opinion: 3

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 3, No text required: 11, No opinion: 3

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 13, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 15, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 12, 7-10 hours: 5, 11-15 hours: 5, > 15 hours: 3

31% (25 of 81) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 42

CO372 Section 001 Xu Wei

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 0, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 2, Just right: 5, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 2, Good: 1, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 2, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 0, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 1, Most of the time: 2, Often enough: 8, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 0

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 0, Interesting: 6, Not Interesting: 5, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 2, Good: 1, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 8, 75-90%: 3, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 3, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 5, No printed course notes: 3, No opinion: 0

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 4, No text required: 5, No opinion: 0

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 6, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 6, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 3, 7-10 hours: 5, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 1

30% (11 of 37) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 43

CO430/CO630 Section 001 Wagner David G

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 4, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 0, Just right: 6, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 5, Good: 1, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 5, Good: 1, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 6, Good: 0, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 0, Most of the time: 4, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 0

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 3, Interesting: 3, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 5, Good: 1, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 6, 75-90%: 0, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 0

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 0, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 5, No opinion: 0

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 3, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 3, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 3, 7-10 hours: 2, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0

55% (6 of 11) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 44

CO442/CO642 Section 001 Postle Luke

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 5, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 7, Just right: 5, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 2, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 0, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 6, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 1, Most of the time: 5, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 0

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 8, Interesting: 4, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 6, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 12, 75-90%: 0, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 8, No opinion: 0

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 7, No opinion: 0

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 7, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 7, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 1, 7-10 hours: 0, 11-15 hours: 7, > 15 hours: 4

44% (12 of 27) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 45

CO450/CO650 Section 001 Fukasawa Ricardo

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 5, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 1, Just right: 6, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 2, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 6, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 3, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 1, Most of the time: 1, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 3

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 2, Interesting: 5, Not Interesting: 2, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 3, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 9, 75-90%: 0, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 7, No opinion: 0

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 2, No opinion: 1

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 6, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 9, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 2, 7-10 hours: 6, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 1

45% (9 of 20) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 46

CO456 Section 001 Gauthier-Shalom Gabriel

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 5, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 6, Just right: 16, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 12, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 7, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 10, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 6, Most of the time: 5, Often enough: 5, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 9

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 13, Interesting: 13, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 8, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 22, 75-90%: 2, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 18, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 13, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 4, No opinion: 3

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 18, No opinion: 4

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 20, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 21, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 4, 3-6 hours: 14, 7-10 hours: 6, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 0

63% (27 of 43) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 47

CO463/CO663 Section 001 Wolkowicz Henry

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 2, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 3, Just right: 2, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 5, Good: 0, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 3, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 3, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 3, Most of the time: 1, Often enough: 0, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 1

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 1, Interesting: 4, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 2, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 4, 75-90%: 1, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 0, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 1, No opinion: 1

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 1, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 4, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 0, 7-10 hours: 2, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 0

36% (5 of 14) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 48

CO485/CO685 Section 001 Jao David

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 9, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 3, Just right: 13, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 2, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 14, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 7, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 12, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 7, Most of the time: 4, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 3

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 9, Interesting: 9, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 12, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 16, 75-90%: 2, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 10, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 12, No opinion: 0

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 17, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 1, No opinion: 0

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 14, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 2, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 14, Somewhat too little: 4, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 4, 3-6 hours: 8, 7-10 hours: 6, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0

73% (19 of 26) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 49

COMM231 Section 001 Radocchia, Joseph Anthony

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 18, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 3, Somewhat too high: 5, Just right: 38, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 18, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 10, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 16, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 22, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 7, Most of the time: 7, Often enough: 11, Not often enough: 3, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 17

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 12, Interesting: 26, Not Interesting: 5, No opinion: 3

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 19, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 35, 75-90%: 4, 50-75%: 6, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 25, Not helpful: 6, No work assigned: 3, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 4, No printed course notes: 24, No opinion: 6

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 13, Helpful: 25, Not helpful: 7, No text required: 0, No opinion: 1

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 37, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 42, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 10, 3-6 hours: 29, 7-10 hours: 6, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0

35% (46 of 133) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 50

COMM421 Section 001 Matheson, Brenton James

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 0, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 2, Just right: 4, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 1, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 2, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 2, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 3, Most of the time: 1, Often enough: 1, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 1

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 2, Interesting: 3, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 0, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 2, 75-90%: 0, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 4, No opinion: 0

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 1, No opinion: 0

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 5, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 5, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 3, 7-10 hours: 0, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0

35% (6 of 17) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 51

COMM431 Section 001 Liu, Zhiyong Michael

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 4, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 0, Just right: 12, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 0, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 3, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 2, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 1, Most of the time: 6, Often enough: 3, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 2

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 7, Interesting: 6, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 4, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 9, 75-90%: 3, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 2, No opinion: 0

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 1, No opinion: 4

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 11, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 9, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 3, 3-6 hours: 5, 7-10 hours: 4, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0

54% (13 of 24) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 52

CS115 Section 001 Dupont Edward

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 46, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 4, Just right: 51, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 1, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 50, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 46, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 49, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 27, Most of the time: 12, Often enough: 5, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 14

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 29, Interesting: 26, Not Interesting: 3, No opinion: 2

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 53, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 48, 75-90%: 9, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 25, Helpful: 27, Not helpful: 4, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 3

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 17, Helpful: 25, Not helpful: 8, No printed course notes: 3, No opinion: 5

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 10, No text required: 20, No opinion: 8

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 9, Okay: 39, Somewhat too little: 5, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 8, Somewhat too much: 15, Okay: 34, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 3, 3-6 hours: 33, 7-10 hours: 19, 11-15 hours: 4, > 15 hours: 1

67% (60 of 90) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 53

CS115 Section 002 Ibrahim Ahmed Fakhri

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 5, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 4, Just right: 22, Somewhat too low: 9, Too low: 1, No opinion: 3

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 13, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 6, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 16, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 4, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 8, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 9, Most of the time: 9, Often enough: 9, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 12

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 13, Interesting: 15, Not Interesting: 8, No opinion: 5

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 10, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 16, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 32, 75-90%: 4, 50-75%: 4, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 16, Helpful: 22, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 24, Not helpful: 5, No printed course notes: 4, No opinion: 0

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 12, No text required: 9, No opinion: 7

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 10, Okay: 28, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 12, Okay: 26, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 14, 7-10 hours: 16, 11-15 hours: 8, > 15 hours: 3

65% (41 of 63) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 54

CS115 Section 003 Graham Sandra Lynn

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 11, Good: 29, Satisfactory: 28, Unsatisfactory: 8, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 3, Somewhat too high: 23, Just right: 41, Somewhat too low: 7, Too low: 3, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 23, Good: 28, Satisfactory: 24, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 17, Good: 37, Satisfactory: 17, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 13, Good: 32, Satisfactory: 24, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 4, No opinion: 1

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 11, Most of the time: 15, Often enough: 21, Not often enough: 2, Never: 1, I did not seek help: 26

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 16, Interesting: 42, Not Interesting: 14, No opinion: 6

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 13, Good: 30, Satisfactory: 23, Unsatisfactory: 7, Very poor: 4, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 67, 75-90%: 8, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 34, Helpful: 37, Not helpful: 7, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 17, Helpful: 31, Not helpful: 9, No printed course notes: 10, No opinion: 10

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 21, Not helpful: 17, No text required: 22, No opinion: 11

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 19, Okay: 53, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 18, Okay: 55, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 4, 3-6 hours: 41, 7-10 hours: 25, 11-15 hours: 5, > 15 hours: 3

74% (78 of 106) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 55

CS115 Section 004 Ibrahim Ahmed Fakhri

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 5, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 2, Just right: 28, Somewhat too low: 10, Too low: 2, No opinion: 3

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 8, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 2

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 4, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 19, Unsatisfactory: 7, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 3, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 21, Unsatisfactory: 10, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 8, Most of the time: 8, Often enough: 12, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 16

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 6, Interesting: 30, Not Interesting: 8, No opinion: 3

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 4, Good: 22, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 39, 75-90%: 4, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 23, Helpful: 21, Not helpful: 3, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 14, Helpful: 16, Not helpful: 6, No printed course notes: 9, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 10, No text required: 6, No opinion: 11

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 10, Okay: 30, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 11, Okay: 34, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 22, 7-10 hours: 18, 11-15 hours: 4, > 15 hours: 2

65% (47 of 72) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 56

CS115 Section 005 Bedawi Safaa Mahmoud Ahmed

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 2, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 18, Unsatisfactory: 8, Very poor: 6, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 5, Just right: 32, Somewhat too low: 12, Too low: 4, No opinion: 2

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 8, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 22, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 7, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 3, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 19, Unsatisfactory: 14, Very poor: 4, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 1, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 22, Unsatisfactory: 8, Very poor: 14, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 13, Most of the time: 9, Often enough: 12, Not often enough: 4, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 19

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 5, Interesting: 35, Not Interesting: 14, No opinion: 4

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 1, Good: 21, Satisfactory: 13, Unsatisfactory: 15, Very poor: 8, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 37, 75-90%: 12, 50-75%: 5, 25-50%: 3, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 21, Helpful: 33, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 25, Not helpful: 11, No printed course notes: 9, No opinion: 5

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 15, Not helpful: 15, No text required: 14, No opinion: 9

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 10, Okay: 32, Somewhat too little: 9, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 16, Okay: 36, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 3, 3-6 hours: 28, 7-10 hours: 17, 11-15 hours: 7, > 15 hours: 2

66% (58 of 88) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 57

CS115 Section 006 Graham Sandra Lynn

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 23, Good: 25, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 3, Somewhat too high: 17, Just right: 37, Somewhat too low: 6, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 23, Good: 30, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 27, Good: 26, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 20, Good: 30, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 16, Most of the time: 15, Often enough: 11, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 20

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 13, Interesting: 37, Not Interesting: 11, No opinion: 3

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 18, Good: 31, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 53, 75-90%: 8, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 32, Helpful: 30, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 12, Helpful: 29, Not helpful: 6, No printed course notes: 10, No opinion: 5

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 19, Not helpful: 3, No text required: 24, No opinion: 8

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 16, Okay: 41, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 6, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 47, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 3, 3-6 hours: 36, 7-10 hours: 17, 11-15 hours: 6, > 15 hours: 1

63% (64 of 101) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 58

CS115 Section 007 Sakhnini Victoria

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 49, Good: 22, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 3, Somewhat too high: 8, Just right: 62, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 50, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 37, Good: 25, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 37, Good: 27, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 30, Most of the time: 18, Often enough: 7, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 18

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 27, Interesting: 36, Not Interesting: 11, No opinion: 2

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 49, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 65, 75-90%: 9, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 38, Helpful: 35, Not helpful: 3, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 24, Helpful: 34, Not helpful: 4, No printed course notes: 10, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 17, Not helpful: 14, No text required: 18, No opinion: 14

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 17, Okay: 49, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 0, No opinion: 2

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 18, Okay: 52, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 6, 3-6 hours: 39, 7-10 hours: 24, 11-15 hours: 5, > 15 hours: 2

73% (76 of 104) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 59

CS115 Section 008 Bedawi Safaa Mahmoud Ahmed

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 9, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 24, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 5, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 11, Just right: 30, Somewhat too low: 8, Too low: 5, No opinion: 4

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 19, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 4, No opinion: 4

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 10, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 11, Very poor: 7, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 6, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 20, Unsatisfactory: 14, Very poor: 9, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 14, Most of the time: 12, Often enough: 16, Not often enough: 3, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 15

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 7, Interesting: 32, Not Interesting: 14, No opinion: 8

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 5, Good: 21, Satisfactory: 18, Unsatisfactory: 7, Very poor: 9, No opinion: 1

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 46, 75-90%: 7, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 3, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 25, Helpful: 34, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 15, Helpful: 23, Not helpful: 7, No printed course notes: 8, No opinion: 8

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 14, No text required: 12, No opinion: 11

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 7, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 45, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 15, Okay: 39, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 3, 3-6 hours: 29, 7-10 hours: 18, 11-15 hours: 8, > 15 hours: 2

62% (61 of 98) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 60

CS115 Section 009 Maftuleac Daniela

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 7, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 13, Unsatisfactory: 8, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 2

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 4, Just right: 23, Somewhat too low: 15, Too low: 3, No opinion: 3

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 8, Good: 21, Satisfactory: 13, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 2

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 10, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 18, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 5, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 11, Very poor: 5, No opinion: 1

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 10, Most of the time: 10, Often enough: 12, Not often enough: 4, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 13

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 8, Interesting: 25, Not Interesting: 15, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 6, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 11, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 2

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 37, 75-90%: 8, 50-75%: 4, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 21, Helpful: 23, Not helpful: 5, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 21, Not helpful: 3, No printed course notes: 10, No opinion: 3

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 15, Not helpful: 8, No text required: 6, No opinion: 9

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 37, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 11, Okay: 35, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 31, 7-10 hours: 12, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 2

73% (49 of 67) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 61

CS115 Section 010 Vogel Daniel

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 39, Good: 32, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 16, Just right: 51, Somewhat too low: 8, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 49, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 44, Good: 26, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 38, Good: 32, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 30, Most of the time: 22, Often enough: 16, Not often enough: 3, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 5

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 29, Interesting: 36, Not Interesting: 9, No opinion: 2

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 46, Good: 22, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 52, 75-90%: 19, 50-75%: 5, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 31, Helpful: 42, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 14, Helpful: 30, Not helpful: 4, No printed course notes: 18, No opinion: 9

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 12, Helpful: 41, Not helpful: 10, No text required: 0, No opinion: 13

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 9, Somewhat too much: 28, Okay: 37, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 12, Somewhat too much: 27, Okay: 36, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 12, 7-10 hours: 31, 11-15 hours: 19, > 15 hours: 14

77% (76 of 99) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 62

CS116 Section 001 Case Lori

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 22, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 3, Somewhat too high: 5, Just right: 23, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 22, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 20, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 21, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 15, Most of the time: 8, Often enough: 1, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 7

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 16, Interesting: 12, Not Interesting: 4, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 21, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 19, 75-90%: 9, 50-75%: 4, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 18, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 12, Helpful: 15, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 1, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 6, No text required: 4, No opinion: 7

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 22, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 9, Okay: 21, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 16, 7-10 hours: 13, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 1

49% (32 of 65) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 63

CS116 Section 002 Case Lori

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 21, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 9, Just right: 26, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 0, No opinion: 2

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 21, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 2

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 18, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 21, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 14, Most of the time: 8, Often enough: 7, Not often enough: 4, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 8

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 14, Interesting: 22, Not Interesting: 3, No opinion: 2

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 21, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 26, 75-90%: 10, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 19, Helpful: 19, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 13, Helpful: 19, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 3, No opinion: 4

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 4, No text required: 7, No opinion: 12

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 11, Okay: 27, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 15, Okay: 23, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 22, 7-10 hours: 12, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 1

48% (41 of 86) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 64

CS116 Section 003 Case Lori

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 15, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 6, Just right: 26, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 19, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 16, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 21, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 14, Most of the time: 7, Often enough: 3, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 8

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 9, Interesting: 20, Not Interesting: 3, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 16, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 21, 75-90%: 10, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 20, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 15, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 2, No opinion: 4

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 12, No opinion: 8

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 22, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 10, Okay: 19, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 15, 7-10 hours: 15, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 1

58% (33 of 57) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 65

CS135 Section 001 Tompkins Dave

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 49, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 4, Just right: 54, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 46, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 49, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 54, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 25, Most of the time: 9, Often enough: 8, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 17

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 32, Interesting: 27, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 58, Good: 1, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 52, 75-90%: 4, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 33, Helpful: 25, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 15, Helpful: 25, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 14, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 15, No text required: 19, No opinion: 11

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 15, Okay: 38, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 10, Somewhat too much: 20, Okay: 28, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 10, 7-10 hours: 26, 11-15 hours: 15, > 15 hours: 7

84% (59 of 70) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 66

CS135 Section 002 Holtby Daniel James

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 6, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 6, Just right: 20, Somewhat too low: 9, Too low: 1, No opinion: 3

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 7, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 13, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 12, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 6, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 1

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 5, Most of the time: 7, Often enough: 9, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 20

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 6, Interesting: 24, Not Interesting: 10, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 4, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 8, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 30, 75-90%: 7, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 26, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 13, Not helpful: 3, No printed course notes: 13, No opinion: 5

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 12, No text required: 5, No opinion: 8

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 28, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 8, Somewhat too much: 11, Okay: 22, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 12, 7-10 hours: 17, 11-15 hours: 5, > 15 hours: 7

64% (41 of 64) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 67

CS135 Section 003 Akinyemi John Akinlabi

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 5, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 10, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 1

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 4, Just right: 18, Somewhat too low: 18, Too low: 3, No opinion: 4

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 7, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 17, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 3

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 5, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 17, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 4, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 3, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 18, Unsatisfactory: 10, Very poor: 5, No opinion: 1

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 7, Most of the time: 6, Often enough: 6, Not often enough: 3, Never: 1, I did not seek help: 23

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 8, Interesting: 24, Not Interesting: 15, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 3, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 17, Unsatisfactory: 9, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 1

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 28, 75-90%: 14, 50-75%: 4, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 24, Helpful: 20, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 1, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 10, Helpful: 15, Not helpful: 6, No printed course notes: 10, No opinion: 4

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 13, Not helpful: 12, No text required: 5, No opinion: 15

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 13, Okay: 27, Somewhat too little: 4, Too little: 2, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 13, Somewhat too much: 22, Okay: 13, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 6, 7-10 hours: 19, 11-15 hours: 14, > 15 hours: 8

70% (48 of 69) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 68

CS135 Section 004 Roegiest Adam Micheal

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 21, Good: 25, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 4, Somewhat too high: 9, Just right: 39, Somewhat too low: 5, Too low: 1, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 12, Good: 32, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 15, Good: 27, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 10, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 18, Good: 26, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 8, Most of the time: 13, Often enough: 8, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 30

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 17, Interesting: 33, Not Interesting: 9, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 16, Good: 28, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 49, 75-90%: 10, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 36, Helpful: 22, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 13, Helpful: 24, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 13, No opinion: 8

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 21, Not helpful: 15, No text required: 5, No opinion: 16

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 9, Somewhat too much: 13, Okay: 34, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 2, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 11, Somewhat too much: 24, Okay: 25, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 10, 7-10 hours: 23, 11-15 hours: 9, > 15 hours: 17

75% (60 of 80) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 69

CS135 Section 005 Tompkins Dave

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 55, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 7, Just right: 55, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 46, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 48, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 60, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 18, Most of the time: 5, Often enough: 7, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 33

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 33, Interesting: 26, Not Interesting: 3, No opinion: 2

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 61, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 57, 75-90%: 4, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 39, Helpful: 21, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 1, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 18, Helpful: 22, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 14, No opinion: 8

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 13, Not helpful: 12, No text required: 21, No opinion: 14

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 16, Okay: 40, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 10, Somewhat too much: 36, Okay: 17, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 11, 7-10 hours: 24, 11-15 hours: 16, > 15 hours: 13

80% (64 of 80) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 70

CS135 Section 006 Istead Lesley Ann

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 11, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 13, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 4, Somewhat too high: 12, Just right: 28, Somewhat too low: 4, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 18, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 17, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 13, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 15, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 11, Most of the time: 10, Often enough: 5, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 21

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 21, Interesting: 23, Not Interesting: 3, No opinion: 2

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 15, Good: 26, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 42, 75-90%: 7, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 28, Helpful: 17, Not helpful: 3, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 15, Not helpful: 5, No printed course notes: 18, No opinion: 3

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 10, No text required: 13, No opinion: 16

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 10, Okay: 30, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 2, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 12, Somewhat too much: 15, Okay: 21, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 10, 7-10 hours: 20, 11-15 hours: 9, > 15 hours: 10

65% (49 of 75) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 71

CS135 Section 007 Istead Lesley Ann

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 11, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 8, Just right: 25, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 18, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 14, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 16, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 6, Most of the time: 8, Often enough: 9, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 13

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 18, Interesting: 17, Not Interesting: 2, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 15, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 30, 75-90%: 5, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 26, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 13, Not helpful: 6, No printed course notes: 8, No opinion: 3

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 13, No text required: 9, No opinion: 4

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 9, Okay: 26, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 18, Okay: 14, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 5, 7-10 hours: 18, 11-15 hours: 10, > 15 hours: 5

53% (39 of 73) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 72

CS135 Section 008 Holtby Daniel James

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 8, Good: 25, Satisfactory: 16, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 2

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 11, Just right: 33, Somewhat too low: 6, Too low: 2, No opinion: 4

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 12, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 17, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 7, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 8, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 2

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 9, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 18, Unsatisfactory: 13, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 1

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 3, Most of the time: 6, Often enough: 14, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 30

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 8, Interesting: 30, Not Interesting: 12, No opinion: 6

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 4, Good: 25, Satisfactory: 19, Unsatisfactory: 7, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 43, 75-90%: 10, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 28, Helpful: 22, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 3

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 23, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 14, No opinion: 10

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 18, Not helpful: 9, No text required: 10, No opinion: 15

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 15, Okay: 32, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 2, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 6, Somewhat too much: 21, Okay: 29, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 13, 7-10 hours: 23, 11-15 hours: 10, > 15 hours: 9

74% (56 of 76) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 73

CS135 Section 009 Akinyemi John Akinlabi

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 5, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 5, Just right: 15, Somewhat too low: 10, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 4, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 6, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 2, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 7, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 8, Most of the time: 2, Often enough: 7, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 12

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 7, Interesting: 20, Not Interesting: 5, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 2, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 24, 75-90%: 5, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 18, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 4, No printed course notes: 10, No opinion: 4

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 11, No text required: 10, No opinion: 5

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 6, Somewhat too much: 13, Okay: 13, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 11, Somewhat too much: 11, Okay: 10, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 2, 7-10 hours: 8, 11-15 hours: 13, > 15 hours: 8

67% (32 of 48) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 74

CS135 Section 010 Roegiest Adam Micheal

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 18, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 15, Just right: 32, Somewhat too low: 6, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 17, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 2

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 14, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 18, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 25, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 9, Most of the time: 8, Often enough: 7, Not often enough: 1, Never: 1, I did not seek help: 28

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 20, Interesting: 25, Not Interesting: 9, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 16, Good: 28, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 44, 75-90%: 8, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 27, Helpful: 22, Not helpful: 4, No work assigned: 1, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 12, Helpful: 24, Not helpful: 3, No printed course notes: 8, No opinion: 7

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 13, Not helpful: 18, No text required: 10, No opinion: 11

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 17, Okay: 29, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 1, No opinion: 2

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 10, Somewhat too much: 25, Okay: 20, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 9, 7-10 hours: 20, 11-15 hours: 8, > 15 hours: 17

69% (55 of 80) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 75

CS135 Section 011 Heinle Albert

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 18, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 11, Just right: 35, Somewhat too low: 6, Too low: 2, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 25, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 15, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 17, Good: 26, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 18, Most of the time: 14, Often enough: 7, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 14

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 19, Interesting: 24, Not Interesting: 8, No opinion: 3

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 15, Good: 29, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 38, 75-90%: 11, 50-75%: 4, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 28, Helpful: 25, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 16, Not helpful: 6, No printed course notes: 19, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 13, No text required: 19, No opinion: 9

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 38, Somewhat too little: 4, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 26, Okay: 22, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 12, 7-10 hours: 22, 11-15 hours: 14, > 15 hours: 5

71% (54 of 76) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 76

CS136 Section 001 Cormack Gordon V

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 18, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 7, Just right: 33, Somewhat too low: 6, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 26, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 13, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 24, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 15, Most of the time: 10, Often enough: 6, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 14

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 18, Interesting: 23, Not Interesting: 3, No opinion: 2

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 22, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 30, 75-90%: 14, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 25, Helpful: 20, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 18, Helpful: 19, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 3, No opinion: 4

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 6, No text required: 9, No opinion: 18

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 35, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 3, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 35, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 19, 7-10 hours: 18, 11-15 hours: 5, > 15 hours: 4

62% (46 of 74) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 77

CS136 Section 002 Cormack Gordon V

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 8, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 6, Just right: 24, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 19, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 9, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 10, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 12, Most of the time: 5, Often enough: 9, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 7

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 17, Interesting: 13, Not Interesting: 2, No opinion: 2

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 8, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 24, 75-90%: 4, 50-75%: 5, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 21, Helpful: 13, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 12, Helpful: 16, Not helpful: 3, No printed course notes: 3, No opinion: 0

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 8, No text required: 8, No opinion: 11

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 27, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 9, Okay: 22, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 11, 7-10 hours: 13, 11-15 hours: 6, > 15 hours: 3

49% (34 of 70) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 78

CS136 Section 003 Bright Curtis William

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 6, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 4, Just right: 23, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 11, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 7, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 7, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 7, Most of the time: 7, Often enough: 5, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 10

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 7, Interesting: 21, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 11, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 23, 75-90%: 5, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 13, Helpful: 16, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 4, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 9, No opinion: 10

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 27, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 25, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 9, 7-10 hours: 15, 11-15 hours: 6, > 15 hours: 0

41% (30 of 74) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 79

CS137 Section 001 Morton Andrew

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 23, Good: 27, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 4, Just right: 50, Somewhat too low: 5, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 27, Good: 26, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 21, Good: 34, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 30, Good: 22, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 8, Most of the time: 8, Often enough: 5, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 35

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 20, Interesting: 37, Not Interesting: 3, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 25, Good: 32, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 54, 75-90%: 3, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 2, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 34, Helpful: 25, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 31, No opinion: 10

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 16, Not helpful: 9, No text required: 14, No opinion: 12

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 37, Somewhat too little: 13, Too little: 7, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 55, Somewhat too little: 5, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 20, 3-6 hours: 34, 7-10 hours: 5, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 1

49% (61 of 124) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 80

CS145 Section 001 Lushman Bradley Michael

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 34, Good: 27, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 3, Somewhat too high: 15, Just right: 42, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 1, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 27, Good: 25, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 26, Good: 28, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 29, Good: 28, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 11, Most of the time: 15, Often enough: 11, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 25

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 42, Interesting: 20, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 29, Good: 31, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 53, 75-90%: 9, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 37, Helpful: 25, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 1, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 31, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 19, No opinion: 3

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 48, No opinion: 4

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 12, Okay: 43, Somewhat too little: 4, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 52, Somewhat too little: 8, Too little: 2, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 8, 3-6 hours: 32, 7-10 hours: 20, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 0

83% (63 of 76) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 81

CS200 Section 001 Daly Barbara

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 12, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 3, Just right: 20, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 15, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 11, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 13, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 8, Most of the time: 5, Often enough: 3, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 9

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 5, Interesting: 17, Not Interesting: 3, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 12, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 18, 75-90%: 6, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 13, Helpful: 13, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 5, No printed course notes: 5, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 13, Not helpful: 8, No text required: 0, No opinion: 3

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 23, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 20, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 14, 7-10 hours: 7, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 0

67% (26 of 39) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 82

CS230 Section 001 Al-Masri Eyhab

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 26, Good: 25, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 16, Just right: 42, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 36, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 21, Good: 28, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 19, Good: 28, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 18, Most of the time: 15, Often enough: 8, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 19

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 12, Interesting: 41, Not Interesting: 6, No opinion: 3

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 28, Good: 27, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 39, 75-90%: 15, 50-75%: 5, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 3

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 33, Helpful: 28, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 15, Helpful: 21, Not helpful: 3, No printed course notes: 20, No opinion: 3

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 4, No text required: 38, No opinion: 15

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 22, Okay: 34, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 57, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 10, 3-6 hours: 36, 7-10 hours: 13, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 0

61% (62 of 101) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 83

CS234 Section 001 Hosseini Hadi

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 45, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 1, Just right: 47, Somewhat too low: 9, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 41, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 37, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 41, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 21, Most of the time: 9, Often enough: 3, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 25

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 26, Interesting: 28, Not Interesting: 3, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 45, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 37, 75-90%: 15, 50-75%: 4, 25-50%: 2, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 23, Helpful: 31, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 2

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 16, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 25, No opinion: 5

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 3, No text required: 26, No opinion: 17

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 45, Somewhat too little: 8, Too little: 2, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 54, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 2, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 25, 3-6 hours: 27, 7-10 hours: 4, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0

67% (59 of 88) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 84

CS234 Section 002 Mehrabi Saeed

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 15, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 2, Just right: 26, Somewhat too low: 5, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 22, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 16, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 13, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 12, Most of the time: 7, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 9

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 12, Interesting: 18, Not Interesting: 3, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 19, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 18, 75-90%: 11, 50-75%: 4, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 17, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 14, No opinion: 0

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 13, No opinion: 9

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 21, Somewhat too little: 8, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 29, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 8, 3-6 hours: 17, 7-10 hours: 7, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0

42% (33 of 79) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 85

CS240 Section 001 Storjohann Arne

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 9, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 13, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 8, Just right: 20, Somewhat too low: 4, Too low: 2, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 8, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 7, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 4, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 5, Most of the time: 7, Often enough: 9, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 14

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 12, Interesting: 20, Not Interesting: 5, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 8, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 25, 75-90%: 6, 50-75%: 6, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 17, Helpful: 18, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 15, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 12, No opinion: 0

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 21, No opinion: 9

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 10, Okay: 23, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 32, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 17, 7-10 hours: 17, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 1

39% (37 of 94) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 86

CS240 Section 002 Storjohann Arne

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 1, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 11, Just right: 15, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 2, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 3

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 3, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 9, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 4, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 2, Most of the time: 3, Often enough: 5, Not often enough: 3, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 16

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 7, Interesting: 17, Not Interesting: 5, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 2, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 7, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 20, 75-90%: 7, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 10, Helpful: 16, Not helpful: 3, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 5, No printed course notes: 10, No opinion: 0

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 4, No text required: 17, No opinion: 7

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 26, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 28, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 21, 7-10 hours: 8, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

31% (29 of 93) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 87

CS241 Section 001 Vasiga Troy Michael John

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 31, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 3, Somewhat too high: 2, Just right: 29, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 22, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 24, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 31, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 12, Most of the time: 3, Often enough: 7, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 12

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 14, Interesting: 17, Not Interesting: 4, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 27, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 31, 75-90%: 4, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 18, Helpful: 17, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 17, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 12, No opinion: 0

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 25, No opinion: 3

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 26, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 12, Okay: 20, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 4, 7-10 hours: 11, 11-15 hours: 8, > 15 hours: 13

44% (36 of 81) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 88

CS241 Section 002 Vasiga Troy Michael John

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 27, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 5, Just right: 29, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 27, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 17, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 32, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 11, Most of the time: 1, Often enough: 5, Not often enough: 3, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 16

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 16, Interesting: 18, Not Interesting: 2, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 29, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 29, 75-90%: 3, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 22, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 4, No printed course notes: 13, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 24, No opinion: 6

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 10, Okay: 23, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 7, Somewhat too much: 19, Okay: 9, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 2, 7-10 hours: 15, 11-15 hours: 8, > 15 hours: 11

47% (36 of 77) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 89

CS241 Section 003 Lushman Bradley Michael

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 16, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 6, Just right: 18, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 14, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 15, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 18, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 5, Most of the time: 6, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 13

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 17, Interesting: 8, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 18, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 20, 75-90%: 3, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 17, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 4, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 12, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 0, Not helpful: 3, No text required: 17, No opinion: 6

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 22, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 10, Okay: 13, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 6, 7-10 hours: 12, 11-15 hours: 5, > 15 hours: 4

60% (27 of 45) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 90

CS241 Section 004 Lanctot Kevin

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 8, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 2, Just right: 20, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 4, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 10, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 8, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 1, Most of the time: 4, Often enough: 5, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 12

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 12, Interesting: 10, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 8, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 11, 75-90%: 8, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 2, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 14, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 14, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 3, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 0, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 18, No opinion: 4

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 16, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 9, Okay: 9, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 5, 7-10 hours: 8, 11-15 hours: 4, > 15 hours: 7

41% (24 of 58) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 91

CS241 Section 005 Lhotak Ondrej

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 33, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 2

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 4, Just right: 37, Somewhat too low: 6, Too low: 1, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 33, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 2

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 14, Good: 25, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 2

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 25, Good: 21, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 18, Most of the time: 9, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 20

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 36, Interesting: 14, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 33, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 39, 75-90%: 8, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 2

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 44, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 40, No opinion: 4

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 0, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 43, No opinion: 6

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 44, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 2, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 12, Okay: 34, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 21, 7-10 hours: 14, 11-15 hours: 11, > 15 hours: 2

74% (50 of 68) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 92

CS245 Section 001 Van Beek Peter

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 17, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 7, Just right: 35, Somewhat too low: 4, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 23, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 20, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 17, Good: 21, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 8, Most of the time: 3, Often enough: 11, Not often enough: 1, Never: 1, I did not seek help: 24

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 16, Interesting: 21, Not Interesting: 10, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 20, Good: 22, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 32, 75-90%: 6, 50-75%: 8, 25-50%: 2, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 22, Helpful: 23, Not helpful: 3, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 17, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 4, No printed course notes: 11, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 15, Not helpful: 10, No text required: 9, No opinion: 9

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 37, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 39, Somewhat too little: 6, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 4, 3-6 hours: 34, 7-10 hours: 9, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0

54% (48 of 89) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 93

CS245 Section 002 Buss Jonathan

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 5, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 9, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 12, Just right: 15, Somewhat too low: 4, Too low: 1, No opinion: 3

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 8, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 16, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 4, No opinion: 2

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 6, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 5, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 4, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 7, Very poor: 11, No opinion: 1

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 5, Most of the time: 1, Often enough: 7, Not often enough: 2, Never: 1, I did not seek help: 20

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 2, Interesting: 20, Not Interesting: 13, No opinion: 2

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 4, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 13, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 10, No opinion: 1

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 14, 75-90%: 11, 50-75%: 4, 25-50%: 2, < 25%: 6

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 16, Helpful: 17, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 19, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 8, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 3, No text required: 8, No opinion: 14

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 26, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 3

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 33, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 4, 3-6 hours: 29, 7-10 hours: 4, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

49% (37 of 76) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 94

CS245 Section 003 Buss Jonathan

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 1, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 6, No opinion: 3

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 13, Just right: 8, Somewhat too low: 5, Too low: 1, No opinion: 4

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 0, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 4

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 2, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 3

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 0, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 7, Very poor: 5, No opinion: 3

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 1, Most of the time: 3, Often enough: 3, Not often enough: 3, Never: 1, I did not seek help: 20

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 3, Interesting: 15, Not Interesting: 12, No opinion: 2

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 0, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 6, No opinion: 4

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 17, 75-90%: 6, 50-75%: 4, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 5

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 20, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 3, No printed course notes: 4, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 8, No text required: 5, No opinion: 10

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 26, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 26, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 4, 3-6 hours: 22, 7-10 hours: 5, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0

47% (32 of 68) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 95

CS245 Section 004 Van Beek Peter

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 20, Good: 27, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 13, Just right: 37, Somewhat too low: 4, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 36, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 20, Good: 25, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 22, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 9, Most of the time: 8, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 28

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 10, Interesting: 29, Not Interesting: 10, No opinion: 5

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 26, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 39, 75-90%: 10, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 25, Helpful: 26, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 1, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 18, Helpful: 19, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 10, No opinion: 5

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 8, No text required: 11, No opinion: 18

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 11, Okay: 39, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 48, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 4, 3-6 hours: 44, 7-10 hours: 6, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

58% (54 of 93) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 96

CS245 Section 005 Van Beek Peter

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 19, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 6, Just right: 30, Somewhat too low: 6, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 22, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 2

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 13, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 16, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 7, Most of the time: 4, Often enough: 1, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 33

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 9, Interesting: 23, Not Interesting: 12, No opinion: 2

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 20, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 30, 75-90%: 9, 50-75%: 5, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 22, Helpful: 21, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 16, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 3, No printed course notes: 6, No opinion: 5

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 7, No text required: 12, No opinion: 13

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 9, Okay: 27, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 35, Somewhat too little: 4, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 6, 3-6 hours: 27, 7-10 hours: 9, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0

54% (46 of 85) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 97

CS245 Section 006 Ben-David Shai

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 3, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 2, Just right: 19, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 10, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 5, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 8, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 5, Most of the time: 2, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 11

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 12, Interesting: 10, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 9, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 18, 75-90%: 4, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 15, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 0, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 20, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 16, No opinion: 3

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 19, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 8, Somewhat too little: 15, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 8, 3-6 hours: 14, 7-10 hours: 1, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

66% (23 of 35) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 98

CS246 Section 001 Naeem Nomair Ahmed

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 50, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 6, Somewhat too high: 7, Just right: 50, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 43, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 40, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 53, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 18, Most of the time: 11, Often enough: 6, Not often enough: 3, Never: 1, I did not seek help: 21

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 40, Interesting: 20, Not Interesting: 2, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 50, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 59, 75-90%: 4, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 44, Helpful: 16, Not helpful: 3, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 10, No printed course notes: 26, No opinion: 8

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 5, No text required: 34, No opinion: 13

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 8, Somewhat too much: 13, Okay: 41, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 17, Somewhat too much: 23, Okay: 21, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 2, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 1, 7-10 hours: 15, 11-15 hours: 20, > 15 hours: 26

72% (63 of 88) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 99

CS246 Section 002 Zhang Cheng

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 8, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 2

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 6, Just right: 24, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 0, No opinion: 4

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 5, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 7, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 4

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 5, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 13, Unsatisfactory: 9, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 2

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 1, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 14, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 2

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 2, Most of the time: 6, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 26

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 14, Interesting: 18, Not Interesting: 5, No opinion: 2

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 3, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 10, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 2

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 25, 75-90%: 6, 50-75%: 4, 25-50%: 3, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 23, Helpful: 15, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 10, No printed course notes: 17, No opinion: 3

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 5, No text required: 22, No opinion: 6

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 13, Okay: 23, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 10, Somewhat too much: 18, Okay: 10, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 2, 7-10 hours: 6, 11-15 hours: 14, > 15 hours: 17

52% (39 of 75) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 100

CS246 Section 003 Naeem Nomair Ahmed

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 46, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 13, Just right: 47, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 53, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 34, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 48, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 15, Most of the time: 14, Often enough: 5, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 27

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 45, Interesting: 17, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 52, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 58, 75-90%: 3, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 39, Helpful: 19, Not helpful: 5, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 6, No printed course notes: 41, No opinion: 5

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 46, No opinion: 8

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 7, Somewhat too much: 19, Okay: 33, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 16, Somewhat too much: 23, Okay: 23, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 9, 7-10 hours: 11, 11-15 hours: 19, > 15 hours: 24

70% (63 of 90) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 101

CS246 Section 004 Zhang Cheng

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 9, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 13, Unsatisfactory: 7, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 6, Just right: 29, Somewhat too low: 4, Too low: 1, No opinion: 4

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 6, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 19, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 8, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 7, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 4, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 6, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 2, Most of the time: 1, Often enough: 5, Not often enough: 1, Never: 1, I did not seek help: 33

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 22, Interesting: 18, Not Interesting: 4, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 5, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 16, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 5, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 27, 75-90%: 11, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 2, < 25%: 3

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 28, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 6, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 8, No printed course notes: 19, No opinion: 5

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 4, No text required: 25, No opinion: 11

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 35, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 11, Somewhat too much: 16, Okay: 19, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 8, 7-10 hours: 13, 11-15 hours: 13, > 15 hours: 12

63% (46 of 73) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 102

CS246 Section 005 Naeem Nomair Ahmed

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 54, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 14, Just right: 52, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 2

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 59, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 46, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 59, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 14, Most of the time: 6, Often enough: 11, Not often enough: 3, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 36

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 41, Interesting: 27, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 58, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 63, 75-90%: 6, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 46, Helpful: 22, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 14, No printed course notes: 29, No opinion: 14

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 41, No opinion: 23

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 6, Somewhat too much: 24, Okay: 38, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 2

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 23, Somewhat too much: 20, Okay: 27, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 6, 7-10 hours: 13, 11-15 hours: 18, > 15 hours: 33

72% (70 of 97) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 103

CS251 Section 001 Kharal Rosina

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 14, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 2, Just right: 38, Somewhat too low: 5, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 15, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 12, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 8, Very poor: 5, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 18, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 13, Most of the time: 8, Often enough: 5, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 20

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 14, Interesting: 23, Not Interesting: 7, No opinion: 2

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 16, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 29, 75-90%: 11, 50-75%: 6, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 19, Helpful: 26, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 19, Not helpful: 15, No printed course notes: 3, No opinion: 3

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 16, Not helpful: 8, No text required: 5, No opinion: 15

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 41, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 42, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 6, 3-6 hours: 34, 7-10 hours: 5, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0

52% (47 of 90) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 104

CS251 Section 002 Kharal Rosina

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 15, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 15, Just right: 29, Somewhat too low: 4, Too low: 1, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 23, Good: 22, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 8, Good: 22, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 8, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 20, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 13, Most of the time: 7, Often enough: 6, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 25

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 10, Interesting: 30, Not Interesting: 11, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 18, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 36, 75-90%: 12, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 23, Helpful: 26, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 10, Helpful: 25, Not helpful: 9, No printed course notes: 2, No opinion: 5

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 11, No text required: 12, No opinion: 11

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 41, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 45, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 8, 3-6 hours: 37, 7-10 hours: 5, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0

53% (51 of 97) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 105

CS330 Section 001 Liu Zhiyong Michael

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 24, Good: 32, Satisfactory: 16, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 10, Just right: 57, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 26, Good: 35, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 24, Good: 26, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 23, Good: 31, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 7, Most of the time: 20, Often enough: 10, Not often enough: 4, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 31

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 20, Interesting: 38, Not Interesting: 11, No opinion: 3

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 27, Good: 31, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 47, 75-90%: 18, 50-75%: 4, 25-50%: 3, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 54, Not helpful: 7, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 4

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 17, Not helpful: 9, No printed course notes: 37, No opinion: 6

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 12, No text required: 35, No opinion: 14

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 16, Okay: 54, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 56, Somewhat too little: 4, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 34, 3-6 hours: 27, 7-10 hours: 5, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 0

65% (73 of 112) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 106

CS330 Section 002 Liu Zhiyong Michael

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 23, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 3, Somewhat too high: 5, Just right: 36, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 19, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 18, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 16, Good: 21, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 11, Most of the time: 9, Often enough: 14, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 13

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 17, Interesting: 23, Not Interesting: 7, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 25, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 24, 75-90%: 16, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 2, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 14, Helpful: 27, Not helpful: 5, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 5, No printed course notes: 19, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 10, No text required: 9, No opinion: 11

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 37, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 37, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 22, 3-6 hours: 21, 7-10 hours: 3, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

47% (47 of 101) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 107

CS335 Section 001 Xu Wei

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 2, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 16, Unsatisfactory: 8, Very poor: 9, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 8, Somewhat too high: 7, Just right: 11, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 8, No opinion: 2

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 2, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 9, Very poor: 9, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 3, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 13, Unsatisfactory: 10, Very poor: 5, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 0, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 11, Very poor: 9, No opinion: 2

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 3, Most of the time: 4, Often enough: 9, Not often enough: 11, Never: 4, I did not seek help: 8

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 3, Interesting: 21, Not Interesting: 14, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 0, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 13, Very poor: 8, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 34, 75-90%: 4, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 25, Not helpful: 10, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 16, Not helpful: 17, No printed course notes: 1, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 10, No text required: 16, No opinion: 3

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 10, Somewhat too much: 11, Okay: 13, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 3, No opinion: 2

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 14, Okay: 15, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 4, No opinion: 1

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 3, 3-6 hours: 14, 7-10 hours: 16, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 3

44% (39 of 88) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 108

CS338 Section 001 Toman David

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 3, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 4, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 13, Just right: 19, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 3, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 10, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 7, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 1, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 13, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 7, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 5, Most of the time: 6, Often enough: 7, Not often enough: 4, Never: 1, I did not seek help: 15

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 2, Interesting: 21, Not Interesting: 9, No opinion: 5

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 3, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 5, No opinion: 1

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 21, 75-90%: 12, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 2, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 12, Helpful: 20, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 2, No opinion: 2

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 13, Not helpful: 3, No printed course notes: 12, No opinion: 3

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 3, No text required: 22, No opinion: 8

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 29, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 2

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 29, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 3, No opinion: 2

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 14, 3-6 hours: 16, 7-10 hours: 7, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

37% (38 of 103) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 109

CS341 Section 001 Stinson Douglas R

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 14, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 13, Just right: 26, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 2, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 21, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 11, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 18, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 9, Most of the time: 5, Often enough: 5, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 26

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 13, Interesting: 27, Not Interesting: 4, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 17, Good: 21, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 32, 75-90%: 8, 50-75%: 4, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 14, Helpful: 26, Not helpful: 4, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 10, Helpful: 15, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 13, No opinion: 6

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 3, No text required: 13, No opinion: 18

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 10, Okay: 28, Somewhat too little: 5, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 35, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 3, 3-6 hours: 24, 7-10 hours: 14, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 1

58% (45 of 78) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 110

CS341 Section 002 Stinson Douglas R

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 14, Good: 22, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 3, Somewhat too high: 14, Just right: 22, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 13, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 6, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 16, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 14, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 3, Most of the time: 8, Often enough: 6, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 23

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 9, Interesting: 26, Not Interesting: 5, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 11, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 33, 75-90%: 5, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 10, Helpful: 28, Not helpful: 3, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 16, Not helpful: 4, No printed course notes: 7, No opinion: 3

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 3, No text required: 11, No opinion: 19

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 25, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 29, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 14, 7-10 hours: 17, 11-15 hours: 8, > 15 hours: 1

51% (41 of 81) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 111

CS341 Section 003 Lanctot Kevin

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 10, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 3, Just right: 18, Somewhat too low: 7, Too low: 2, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 15, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 2

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 5, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 12, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 2, Most of the time: 2, Often enough: 5, Not often enough: 4, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 19

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 5, Interesting: 22, Not Interesting: 4, No opinion: 2

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 10, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 22, 75-90%: 6, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 2, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 19, Not helpful: 4, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 2

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 6, No opinion: 6

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 3, No text required: 6, No opinion: 14

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 18, Somewhat too little: 4, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 24, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 3, 3-6 hours: 19, 7-10 hours: 11, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0

42% (34 of 81) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 112

CS343 Section 001 Buhr Peter A

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 36, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 3, Somewhat too high: 9, Just right: 32, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 25, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 20, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 35, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 7, Most of the time: 1, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 0, Never: 1, I did not seek help: 31

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 30, Interesting: 12, Not Interesting: 2, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 36, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 32, 75-90%: 7, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 33, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 24, Helpful: 16, Not helpful: 3, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 21, No opinion: 11

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 11, Okay: 27, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 11, Somewhat too much: 16, Okay: 17, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 8, 7-10 hours: 17, 11-15 hours: 13, > 15 hours: 4

58% (44 of 76) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 113

CS343 Section 002 Harji Ashif S

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 11, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 9, Just right: 19, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 17, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 7, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 14, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 5, Most of the time: 5, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 17

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 18, Interesting: 11, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 17, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 27, 75-90%: 2, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 16, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 17, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 13, No opinion: 5

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 18, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 10, Okay: 15, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 6, 7-10 hours: 14, 11-15 hours: 7, > 15 hours: 3

46% (30 of 65) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 114

CS343 Section 003 Buhr Peter A

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 21, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 4, Just right: 19, Somewhat too low: 7, Too low: 1, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 20, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 2

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 16, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 26, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 1

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 6, Most of the time: 3, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 4, Never: 1, I did not seek help: 16

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 20, Interesting: 10, Not Interesting: 4, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 21, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 1

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 27, 75-90%: 4, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 19, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 3, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 14, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 1, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 3, No text required: 15, No opinion: 8

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 23, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 7, Somewhat too much: 9, Okay: 18, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 6, 7-10 hours: 13, 11-15 hours: 7, > 15 hours: 8

56% (34 of 61) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 115

CS348 Section 001 Chan Edward

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 2, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 13, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 9, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 3, Just right: 12, Somewhat too low: 8, Too low: 2, No opinion: 7

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 1, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 9, Very poor: 8, No opinion: 5

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 2, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 13, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 10, No opinion: 2

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 1, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 13, No opinion: 2

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 2, Most of the time: 1, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 3, Never: 3, I did not seek help: 23

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 2, Interesting: 13, Not Interesting: 18, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 3, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 9, Very poor: 9, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 9, 75-90%: 9, 50-75%: 4, 25-50%: 4, < 25%: 8

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 26, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 9, No printed course notes: 8, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 0, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 14, No opinion: 18

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 21, Somewhat too little: 6, Too little: 5, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 25, Somewhat too little: 5, Too little: 3, No opinion: 1

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 9, 3-6 hours: 19, 7-10 hours: 6, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

42% (34 of 81) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 116

CS348 Section 002 Chan Edward

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 2, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 8, Very poor: 19, No opinion: 1

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 4, Just right: 14, Somewhat too low: 7, Too low: 9, No opinion: 9

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 0, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 17, No opinion: 7

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 1, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 17, No opinion: 3

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 1, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 8, Very poor: 24, No opinion: 2

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 0, Most of the time: 2, Often enough: 3, Not often enough: 3, Never: 8, I did not seek help: 28

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 2, Interesting: 15, Not Interesting: 24, No opinion: 3

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 1, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 7, Very poor: 21, No opinion: 2

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 9, 75-90%: 5, 50-75%: 7, 25-50%: 6, < 25%: 17

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 24, Not helpful: 11, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 16, No printed course notes: 9, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 0, Not helpful: 7, No text required: 22, No opinion: 12

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 27, Somewhat too little: 6, Too little: 6, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 33, Somewhat too little: 7, Too little: 2, No opinion: 1

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 7, 3-6 hours: 27, 7-10 hours: 8, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 0

58% (44 of 76) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 117

CS348 Section 003 Chan Edward

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 1, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 7, Very poor: 12, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 3, Just right: 11, Somewhat too low: 10, Too low: 6, No opinion: 6

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 2, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 10, Very poor: 12, No opinion: 3

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 2, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 14, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 1, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 19, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 1, Most of the time: 0, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 6, Never: 6, I did not seek help: 22

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 0, Interesting: 13, Not Interesting: 23, No opinion: 2

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 1, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 11, Very poor: 13, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 12, 75-90%: 1, 50-75%: 11, 25-50%: 5, < 25%: 9

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 24, Not helpful: 7, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 2

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 13, No printed course notes: 10, No opinion: 4

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 20, No opinion: 13

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 22, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 4, No opinion: 5

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 32, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 10, 3-6 hours: 20, 7-10 hours: 7, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 1

49% (38 of 78) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 118

CS349 Section 001 Becker Byron Weber

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 12, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 3, Just right: 19, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 12, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 11, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 12, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 3, Most of the time: 5, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 13

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 12, Interesting: 11, Not Interesting: 2, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 12, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 15, 75-90%: 7, 50-75%: 4, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 3, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 10, No opinion: 4

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 0, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 15, No opinion: 7

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 16, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 14, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 4, 7-10 hours: 10, 11-15 hours: 7, > 15 hours: 5

52% (26 of 50) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 119

CS349 Section 002 Becker Byron Weber

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 14, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 0, Just right: 20, Somewhat too low: 5, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 10, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 9, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 14, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 4, Most of the time: 4, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 2, Never: 1, I did not seek help: 14

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 14, Interesting: 10, Not Interesting: 3, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 14, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 22, 75-90%: 3, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 13, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 3, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 12, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 0, Not helpful: 4, No text required: 15, No opinion: 8

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 17, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 9, Okay: 14, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 9, 7-10 hours: 10, 11-15 hours: 4, > 15 hours: 4

60% (27 of 45) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 120

CS350 Section 001 Salem Kenneth

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 25, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 2, Just right: 36, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 29, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 20, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 26, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 14, Most of the time: 5, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 16

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 18, Interesting: 22, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 26, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 33, 75-90%: 4, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 2, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 17, Helpful: 23, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 21, Helpful: 15, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 3

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 4, No text required: 16, No opinion: 9

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 31, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 6, Somewhat too much: 13, Okay: 20, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 5, 7-10 hours: 12, 11-15 hours: 12, > 15 hours: 12

57% (42 of 74) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 121

CS350 Section 002 Wong Bernard

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 33, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 7, Just right: 41, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 39, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 19, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 34, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 20, Most of the time: 7, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 18

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 21, Interesting: 24, Not Interesting: 3, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 37, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 41, 75-90%: 6, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 24, Helpful: 21, Not helpful: 4, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 18, Helpful: 23, Not helpful: 3, No printed course notes: 2, No opinion: 3

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 16, No opinion: 20

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 6, Somewhat too much: 14, Okay: 27, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 9, Somewhat too much: 16, Okay: 21, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 4, 7-10 hours: 18, 11-15 hours: 10, > 15 hours: 17

66% (49 of 74) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 122

CS350 Section 003 Wong Bernard

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 49, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 12, Just right: 42, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 50, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 40, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 43, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 34, Most of the time: 6, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 15

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 29, Interesting: 26, Not Interesting: 2, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 49, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 42, 75-90%: 11, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 33, Helpful: 23, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 28, Helpful: 19, Not helpful: 4, No printed course notes: 1, No opinion: 5

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 3, No text required: 28, No opinion: 13

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 6, Somewhat too much: 25, Okay: 23, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 2, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 11, Somewhat too much: 24, Okay: 20, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 2, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 6, 7-10 hours: 14, 11-15 hours: 18, > 15 hours: 19

68% (57 of 84) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 123

CS360 Section 001 Roberts Collin Donald

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 8, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 1

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 10, Just right: 16, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 2

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 19, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 4

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 10, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 4, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 1

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 5, Most of the time: 2, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 20

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 6, Interesting: 17, Not Interesting: 7, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 10, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 19, 75-90%: 2, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 6, < 25%: 2

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 15, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 3, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 13, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 5, No opinion: 4

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 8, No opinion: 14

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 24, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 20, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 17, 7-10 hours: 9, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 1

53% (31 of 59) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 124

CS370 Section 001 Labahn George

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 17, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 11, Just right: 25, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 10, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 11, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 19, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 4, Most of the time: 6, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 3, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 21

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 15, Interesting: 19, Not Interesting: 4, No opinion: 2

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 17, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 32, 75-90%: 5, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 15, Helpful: 25, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 15, Helpful: 19, Not helpful: 3, No printed course notes: 1, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 21, No opinion: 11

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 28, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 31, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 17, 7-10 hours: 17, 11-15 hours: 4, > 15 hours: 0

54% (40 of 74) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 125

CS370 Section 002 Labahn George

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 14, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 14, Just right: 29, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 12, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 13, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 18, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 5, Most of the time: 7, Often enough: 9, Not often enough: 3, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 20

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 15, Interesting: 23, Not Interesting: 4, No opinion: 2

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 18, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 30, 75-90%: 12, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 19, Helpful: 24, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 28, Not helpful: 6, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 4

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 24, No opinion: 8

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 11, Okay: 32, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 37, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 26, 7-10 hours: 11, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 3

66% (44 of 67) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 126

CS430 Section 001 Kou Tian

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 14, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 3, Just right: 28, Somewhat too low: 4, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 23, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 15, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 11, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 16, Most of the time: 6, Often enough: 5, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 9

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 4, Interesting: 16, Not Interesting: 9, No opinion: 7

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 15, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 32, 75-90%: 2, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 15, Helpful: 19, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 10, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 4, No printed course notes: 10, No opinion: 0

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 4, No text required: 5, No opinion: 10

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 12, Okay: 18, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 29, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 12, 3-6 hours: 15, 7-10 hours: 6, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 0

65% (36 of 55) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 127

CS432 Section 001 Safayeni Suzanne

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 12, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 4, Just right: 17, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 9, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 12, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 10, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 4, Most of the time: 7, Often enough: 5, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 5

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 5, Interesting: 15, Not Interesting: 3, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 10, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 13, 75-90%: 4, 50-75%: 5, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 9, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 18, No opinion: 3

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 21, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 22, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 15, 7-10 hours: 6, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

45% (23 of 51) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 128

CS436/CS636 Section 001 Limam Noura

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 1, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 4, Just right: 11, Somewhat too low: 4, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 5, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 2, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 3, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 3, Most of the time: 4, Often enough: 5, Not often enough: 3, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 5

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 4, Interesting: 13, Not Interesting: 3, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 3, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 16, 75-90%: 1, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 2

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 7, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 3, No printed course notes: 3, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 11, No opinion: 3

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 13, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 17, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 4, 3-6 hours: 11, 7-10 hours: 4, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

74% (20 of 27) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 129

CS445/CS645/ECE451 Section 001 Berry Daniel

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 3, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 2

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 2, Just right: 14, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 1, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 9, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 2

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 2, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 0, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 3

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 10, Most of the time: 0, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 8

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 2, Interesting: 9, Not Interesting: 9, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 3, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 9, 75-90%: 4, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 2, < 25%: 3

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 15, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 3

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 8, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 14, No opinion: 4

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 14, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 1, No opinion: 2

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 16, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 5, 3-6 hours: 12, 7-10 hours: 3, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

53% (20 of 38) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 130

CS456/CS656 Section 001 Boutaba Raouf

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 14, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 1, Just right: 26, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 10, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 8, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 14, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 3, Most of the time: 3, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 18

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 9, Interesting: 19, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 18, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 16, 75-90%: 9, 50-75%: 4, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 10, Helpful: 16, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 9, No opinion: 3

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 3, No opinion: 15

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 27, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 25, Somewhat too little: 4, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 17, 7-10 hours: 8, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 0

50% (29 of 58) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 131

CS456/CS656 Section 002 Boutaba Raouf

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 20, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 5, Just right: 22, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 15, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 13, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 15, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 7, Most of the time: 8, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 12

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 12, Interesting: 17, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 18, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 20, 75-90%: 3, 50-75%: 6, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 14, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 8, No opinion: 4

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 3, No opinion: 12

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 25, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 24, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 15, 7-10 hours: 8, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 3

57% (29 of 51) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 132

CS458/CS658 Section 001 Wang Tao

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 7, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 1, Just right: 18, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 11, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 12, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 5, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 4, Most of the time: 4, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 11

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 13, Interesting: 8, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 8, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 12, 75-90%: 6, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 10, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 3, No text required: 2, No opinion: 7

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 12, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 16, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 10, 7-10 hours: 6, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 3

48% (21 of 44) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 133

CS458/CS658 Section 002 Goldberg Ian

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 26, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 4, Just right: 36, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 29, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 24, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 35, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 10, Most of the time: 5, Often enough: 6, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 22

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 27, Interesting: 15, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 32, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 36, 75-90%: 5, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 19, Helpful: 22, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 17, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 13, No opinion: 5

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 13, Not helpful: 7, No text required: 5, No opinion: 17

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 34, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 9, Okay: 29, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 17, 7-10 hours: 18, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 6

68% (43 of 63) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 134

CS466/CS666 Section 001 Ma Bin

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 14, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 3, Just right: 25, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 16, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 8, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 8, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 12, Most of the time: 5, Often enough: 1, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 13

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 18, Interesting: 9, Not Interesting: 4, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 14, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 27, 75-90%: 2, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 19, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 19, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 3, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 10, No opinion: 12

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 24, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 26, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 19, 7-10 hours: 9, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 2

62% (32 of 52) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 135

CS485/CS685 Section 001 Ben-David Shai

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 9, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 6, Somewhat too high: 9, Just right: 7, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 9, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 7, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 9, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 6, Most of the time: 6, Often enough: 1, Not often enough: 2, Never: 1, I did not seek help: 8

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 10, Interesting: 10, Not Interesting: 4, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 9, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 18, 75-90%: 5, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 18, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 13, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 1, No opinion: 3

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 7, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 11, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 12, Okay: 8, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 8, 7-10 hours: 8, 11-15 hours: 6, > 15 hours: 2

67% (24 of 36) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 136

CS486/CS686 Section 001 Hoey Jesse

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 20, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 13, Just right: 22, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 21, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 14, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 21, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 9, Most of the time: 5, Often enough: 3, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 19

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 16, Interesting: 18, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 19, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 28, 75-90%: 7, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 18, Helpful: 18, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 8, No opinion: 4

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 13, Not helpful: 3, No text required: 6, No opinion: 7

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 23, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 10, Okay: 25, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 16, 7-10 hours: 8, 11-15 hours: 9, > 15 hours: 3

62% (37 of 60) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 137

CS486/CS686 Section 002 Hoey Jesse

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 12, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 3, Somewhat too high: 17, Just right: 20, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 16, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 14, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 21, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 4, Most of the time: 10, Often enough: 7, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 19

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 19, Interesting: 22, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 16, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 27, 75-90%: 12, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 17, Helpful: 22, Not helpful: 3, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 9, No printed course notes: 10, No opinion: 4

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 7, No text required: 5, No opinion: 14

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 31, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 29, Somewhat too little: 4, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 12, 7-10 hours: 17, 11-15 hours: 6, > 15 hours: 5

70% (42 of 60) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 138

CS488/CS688 Section 001 Kaplan Craig Steven

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 17, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 4, Just right: 20, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 19, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 2

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 19, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 22, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 6, Most of the time: 6, Often enough: 3, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 9

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 21, Interesting: 4, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 20, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 20, 75-90%: 3, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 17, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 6, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 5, No text required: 2, No opinion: 8

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 12, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 7, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 9, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 1, 7-10 hours: 5, 11-15 hours: 4, > 15 hours: 14

69% (25 of 36) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 139

CS697 Section 001 DiMarco Chrysanne

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 14, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 0, Just right: 18, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 11, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 10, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 15, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 8, Most of the time: 0, Often enough: 1, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 9

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 8, Interesting: 10, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 14, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 13, 75-90%: 5, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 12, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 5, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 12, No opinion: 3

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 16, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 8, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 9

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 17, 3-6 hours: 1, 7-10 hours: 0, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

64% (18 of 28) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 140

CS745/ECE725 Section 001 Trefler Richard

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 1, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 3, Just right: 6, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 3, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 1, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 2, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 2, Most of the time: 1, Often enough: 3, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 4

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 2, Interesting: 6, Not Interesting: 2, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 2, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 8, 75-90%: 2, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 5, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 0, No opinion: 2

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 8, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 9, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 6, 7-10 hours: 3, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 1

50% (10 of 20) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 141

CS766/QIC820 Section 001 Watrous John

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 6, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 1, Just right: 6, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 5, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 2, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 4, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 4, Most of the time: 3, Often enough: 1, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 1

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 7, Interesting: 2, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 5, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 8, 75-90%: 1, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 0, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 3, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 1, No opinion: 2

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 7, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 8, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 1, 7-10 hours: 5, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 0

69% (9 of 13) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 142

CS768/AMATH871/CO/681/PHYS767/QIC710 Section 001 Cleve Richard Erwin

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 11, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 1, Just right: 12, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 10, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 8, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 9, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 7, Most of the time: 0, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 4

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 10, Interesting: 6, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 10, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 10, 75-90%: 5, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 3, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 6, No opinion: 2

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 13, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 14, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 4, 7-10 hours: 7, 11-15 hours: 5, > 15 hours: 0

64% (16 of 25) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 143

CS770/CM670/AMATH740 Section 001 Orchard Jeffery John

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 13, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 4, Just right: 16, Somewhat too low: 5, Too low: 2, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 14, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 17, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 14, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 12, Most of the time: 10, Often enough: 1, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 5

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 9, Interesting: 15, Not Interesting: 3, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 15, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 26, 75-90%: 2, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 15, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 13, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 13, No opinion: 4

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 18, Somewhat too little: 4, Too little: 2, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 21, Somewhat too little: 4, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 5, 3-6 hours: 12, 7-10 hours: 7, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 2

76% (28 of 37) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 144

MATBUS470 Section 001 Freeland, R Keith

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 5, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 4, Just right: 7, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 6, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 3, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 6, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 3, Most of the time: 3, Often enough: 3, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 3

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 4, Interesting: 9, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 4, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 10, 75-90%: 3, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 10, No opinion: 0

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 2, No opinion: 1

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 9, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 13, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 5, 3-6 hours: 4, 7-10 hours: 4, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

33% (13 of 39) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 145

MATBUS471 Section 001 Wood, Peter J

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 7, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 3, Somewhat too high: 7, Just right: 9, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 15, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 5, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 9, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 9, Most of the time: 5, Often enough: 3, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 5

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 7, Interesting: 12, Not Interesting: 3, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 10, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 14, 75-90%: 6, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 4, No printed course notes: 6, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 7, No text required: 4, No opinion: 4

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 7, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 7, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 17, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 14, 7-10 hours: 4, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 1

36% (22 of 61) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 146

MATH103 Section 001 Henderson Robert Douglas Evert

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 9, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 7, Just right: 11, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 12, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 10, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 10, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 9, Most of the time: 9, Often enough: 0, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 3

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 3, Interesting: 8, Not Interesting: 8, No opinion: 3

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 8, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 15, 75-90%: 5, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 12, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 13, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 3, No text required: 2, No opinion: 1

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 10, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 0, No opinion: 2

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 15, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 4, 3-6 hours: 13, 7-10 hours: 3, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 1

58% (22 of 38) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 147

MATH104 Section 001 Sohail Nasir N

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 6, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 5, Just right: 21, Somewhat too low: 4, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 15, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 9, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 2, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 1

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 10, Most of the time: 4, Often enough: 5, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 11

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 7, Interesting: 12, Not Interesting: 8, No opinion: 3

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 7, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 16, 75-90%: 7, 50-75%: 4, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 14, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 18, No opinion: 4

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 14, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 0, No opinion: 0

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 21, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 0, No opinion: 3

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 23, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 15, 3-6 hours: 11, 7-10 hours: 4, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

45% (30 of 66) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 148

MATH106 Section 001 Gindi Steven

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 2, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 13, Very poor: 10, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 3, Somewhat too high: 14, Just right: 8, Somewhat too low: 6, Too low: 5, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 1, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 18, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 8, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 3, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 8, Very poor: 7, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 2, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 13, Unsatisfactory: 9, Very poor: 7, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 1, Most of the time: 2, Often enough: 7, Not often enough: 7, Never: 3, I did not seek help: 14

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 0, Interesting: 11, Not Interesting: 23, No opinion: 3

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 0, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 11, Very poor: 10, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 21, 75-90%: 8, 50-75%: 5, 25-50%: 2, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 23, Not helpful: 8, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 29, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 14, Helpful: 17, Not helpful: 6, No text required: 0, No opinion: 0

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 9, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 23, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 26, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 21, 7-10 hours: 13, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 1

54% (37 of 69) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 149

MATH109 Section 001 Ashburner Michelle Roshan Marie

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 78, Good: 26, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 3, Somewhat too high: 4, Just right: 94, Somewhat too low: 5, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 74, Good: 29, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 77, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 82, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 48, Most of the time: 28, Often enough: 12, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 16

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 42, Interesting: 56, Not Interesting: 3, No opinion: 5

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 85, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 92, 75-90%: 10, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 2

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 40, Helpful: 48, Not helpful: 6, No work assigned: 5, No opinion: 7

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 74, Helpful: 23, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 5, No opinion: 3

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 41, Helpful: 43, Not helpful: 10, No text required: 2, No opinion: 9

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 85, Somewhat too little: 10, Too little: 5, No opinion: 5

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 9, Okay: 89, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 2, No opinion: 3

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 36, 3-6 hours: 54, 7-10 hours: 14, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0

69% (106 of 154) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 150

MATH109 Section 002 Ashburner Michelle Roshan Marie

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 72, Good: 22, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 5, Somewhat too high: 4, Just right: 82, Somewhat too low: 4, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 68, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 70, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 79, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 39, Most of the time: 26, Often enough: 8, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 23

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 43, Interesting: 43, Not Interesting: 6, No opinion: 6

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 74, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 86, 75-90%: 9, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 2

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 24, Helpful: 54, Not helpful: 3, No work assigned: 6, No opinion: 9

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 67, Helpful: 21, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 2, No opinion: 4

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 27, Helpful: 45, Not helpful: 13, No text required: 2, No opinion: 10

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 68, Somewhat too little: 13, Too little: 6, No opinion: 3

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 14, Okay: 71, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 7

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 41, 3-6 hours: 46, 7-10 hours: 6, 11-15 hours: 5, > 15 hours: 0

72% (98 of 136) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 151

MATH109 Section 003 Ashburner Michelle Roshan Marie

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 68, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 3, Somewhat too high: 5, Just right: 66, Somewhat too low: 5, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 57, Good: 21, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 60, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 63, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 32, Most of the time: 18, Often enough: 8, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 20

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 29, Interesting: 38, Not Interesting: 7, No opinion: 5

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 67, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 67, 75-90%: 9, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 27, Helpful: 39, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 8, No opinion: 4

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 55, Helpful: 15, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 2, No opinion: 7

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 23, Helpful: 40, Not helpful: 10, No text required: 1, No opinion: 6

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 59, Somewhat too little: 6, Too little: 4, No opinion: 5

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 14, Okay: 60, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 1, No opinion: 4

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 25, 3-6 hours: 42, 7-10 hours: 8, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 1

66% (80 of 121) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 152

MATH114 Section 001 Zhu Yi

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 11, Good: 30, Satisfactory: 20, Unsatisfactory: 7, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 3, Somewhat too high: 16, Just right: 40, Somewhat too low: 8, Too low: 1, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 13, Good: 25, Satisfactory: 21, Unsatisfactory: 8, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 13, Good: 28, Satisfactory: 20, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 15, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 20, Unsatisfactory: 8, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 4, Most of the time: 9, Often enough: 11, Not often enough: 4, Never: 1, I did not seek help: 37

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 17, Interesting: 34, Not Interesting: 13, No opinion: 5

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 21, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 17, Unsatisfactory: 8, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 45, 75-90%: 13, 50-75%: 9, 25-50%: 2, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 31, Helpful: 34, Not helpful: 3, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 10, Helpful: 19, Not helpful: 11, No printed course notes: 17, No opinion: 10

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 29, Helpful: 26, Not helpful: 13, No text required: 1, No opinion: 0

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 17, Okay: 45, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 18, Okay: 46, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 8, 3-6 hours: 46, 7-10 hours: 14, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0

62% (69 of 111) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 153

MATH114 Section 002 Zhu Yi

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 10, Good: 39, Satisfactory: 16, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 23, Just right: 44, Somewhat too low: 4, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 13, Good: 30, Satisfactory: 25, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 10, Good: 27, Satisfactory: 30, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 5, Good: 45, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 8, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 4, Most of the time: 10, Often enough: 17, Not often enough: 3, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 38

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 15, Interesting: 37, Not Interesting: 14, No opinion: 5

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 20, Good: 32, Satisfactory: 16, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 51, 75-90%: 14, 50-75%: 5, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 2

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 36, Helpful: 33, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 27, Not helpful: 11, No printed course notes: 18, No opinion: 8

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 18, Helpful: 37, Not helpful: 15, No text required: 0, No opinion: 2

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 14, Okay: 56, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 20, Okay: 49, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 3, 3-6 hours: 54, 7-10 hours: 12, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 1

62% (72 of 116) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 154

MATH124 Section 001 Hamilton Jordan

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 126, Good: 25, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 6, Just right: 139, Somewhat too low: 4, Too low: 1, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 128, Good: 22, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 85, Good: 59, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 128, Good: 22, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 62, Most of the time: 25, Often enough: 13, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 49

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 40, Interesting: 81, Not Interesting: 17, No opinion: 14

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 133, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 121, 75-90%: 26, 50-75%: 5, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 98, Helpful: 54, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 33, Helpful: 33, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 66, No opinion: 15

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 12, Helpful: 42, Not helpful: 30, No text required: 19, No opinion: 47

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 14, Okay: 121, Somewhat too little: 7, Too little: 2, No opinion: 4

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 142, Somewhat too little: 4, Too little: 0, No opinion: 2

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 46, 3-6 hours: 93, 7-10 hours: 11, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0

74% (152 of 206) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 155

MATH127 Section 001 McGrath Paul

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 33, Good: 33, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 3, Somewhat too high: 5, Just right: 55, Somewhat too low: 9, Too low: 2, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 51, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 33, Good: 29, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 31, Good: 31, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 42, Most of the time: 16, Often enough: 5, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 12

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 13, Interesting: 45, Not Interesting: 13, No opinion: 4

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 42, Good: 26, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 50, 75-90%: 18, 50-75%: 6, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 17, Helpful: 36, Not helpful: 8, No work assigned: 9, No opinion: 5

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 23, Not helpful: 6, No printed course notes: 26, No opinion: 9

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 13, Helpful: 30, Not helpful: 18, No text required: 3, No opinion: 11

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 11, Okay: 45, Somewhat too little: 7, Too little: 5, No opinion: 2

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 46, Somewhat too little: 10, Too little: 3, No opinion: 6

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 17, 3-6 hours: 42, 7-10 hours: 11, 11-15 hours: 4, > 15 hours: 1

71% (75 of 105) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 156

MATH127 Section 002 Dunbar Fiona Emer Siobhan

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 36, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 10, Just right: 39, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 34, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 28, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 31, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 12, Most of the time: 3, Often enough: 5, Not often enough: 1, Never: 1, I did not seek help: 29

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 13, Interesting: 21, Not Interesting: 14, No opinion: 7

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 34, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 44, 75-90%: 7, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 14, Helpful: 26, Not helpful: 5, No work assigned: 5, No opinion: 2

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 33, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 4, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 4

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 12, Helpful: 24, Not helpful: 13, No text required: 0, No opinion: 5

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 38, Somewhat too little: 5, Too little: 2, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 9, Okay: 39, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 2, No opinion: 2

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 17, 3-6 hours: 27, 7-10 hours: 9, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 0

53% (55 of 103) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 157

MATH127 Section 003 Ingalls Brian

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 15, Good: 29, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 20, Just right: 34, Somewhat too low: 5, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 34, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 15, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 20, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 20, Good: 26, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 14, Most of the time: 19, Often enough: 5, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 21

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 4, Interesting: 27, Not Interesting: 23, No opinion: 8

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 22, Good: 27, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 40, 75-90%: 14, 50-75%: 6, 25-50%: 2, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 31, Not helpful: 9, No work assigned: 7, No opinion: 3

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 4, No printed course notes: 38, No opinion: 6

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 27, Helpful: 25, Not helpful: 8, No text required: 0, No opinion: 2

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 12, Okay: 45, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 48, Somewhat too little: 7, Too little: 2, No opinion: 2

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 9, 3-6 hours: 40, 7-10 hours: 11, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 1

58% (62 of 106) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 158

MATH127 Section 004 Keplinger Keegan

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 5, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 22, Unsatisfactory: 13, Very poor: 6, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 4, Somewhat too high: 15, Just right: 21, Somewhat too low: 15, Too low: 7, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 11, Good: 25, Satisfactory: 13, Unsatisfactory: 10, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 7, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 20, Unsatisfactory: 16, Very poor: 4, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 3, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 18, Unsatisfactory: 12, Very poor: 10, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 5, Most of the time: 8, Often enough: 14, Not often enough: 3, Never: 3, I did not seek help: 28

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 3, Interesting: 19, Not Interesting: 32, No opinion: 9

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 4, Good: 21, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 16, Very poor: 7, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 51, 75-90%: 5, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 4, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 36, Not helpful: 5, No work assigned: 10, No opinion: 7

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 6, No printed course notes: 46, No opinion: 4

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 10, Helpful: 34, Not helpful: 9, No text required: 3, No opinion: 7

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 11, Okay: 48, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 47, Somewhat too little: 5, Too little: 1, No opinion: 5

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 15, 3-6 hours: 31, 7-10 hours: 16, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 0

67% (65 of 97) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 159

MATH127 Section 005 Smith Paula T.

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 3, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 18, Unsatisfactory: 15, Very poor: 11, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 8, Somewhat too high: 10, Just right: 16, Somewhat too low: 13, Too low: 3, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 6, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 17, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 2

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 1, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 17, Very poor: 18, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 0, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 22, Very poor: 10, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 5, Most of the time: 9, Often enough: 9, Not often enough: 1, Never: 1, I did not seek help: 25

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 2, Interesting: 19, Not Interesting: 25, No opinion: 5

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 2, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 17, Very poor: 11, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 27, 75-90%: 14, 50-75%: 6, 25-50%: 3, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 29, Not helpful: 7, No work assigned: 4, No opinion: 2

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 40, No opinion: 4

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 29, Not helpful: 7, No text required: 3, No opinion: 1

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 15, Okay: 32, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 35, Somewhat too little: 4, Too little: 3, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 9, 3-6 hours: 30, 7-10 hours: 11, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

58% (51 of 88) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 160

MATH127 Section 006 Kuo Wentang

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 5, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 13, Very poor: 5, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 5, Somewhat too high: 17, Just right: 25, Somewhat too low: 4, Too low: 1, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 15, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 17, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 7, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 13, Unsatisfactory: 10, Very poor: 8, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 5, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 16, Unsatisfactory: 11, Very poor: 13, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 5, Most of the time: 7, Often enough: 6, Not often enough: 4, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 31

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 6, Interesting: 21, Not Interesting: 20, No opinion: 6

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 10, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 13, Very poor: 6, No opinion: 2

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 36, 75-90%: 6, 50-75%: 6, 25-50%: 3, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 10, Helpful: 22, Not helpful: 9, No work assigned: 5, No opinion: 6

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 3, No printed course notes: 31, No opinion: 8

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 22, Not helpful: 15, No text required: 1, No opinion: 3

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 6, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 32, Somewhat too little: 5, Too little: 2, No opinion: 2

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 33, Somewhat too little: 6, Too little: 3, No opinion: 6

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 9, 3-6 hours: 28, 7-10 hours: 12, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 2

68% (53 of 78) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 161

MATH127 Section 007 Kloosterman Matthew

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 4, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 4, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 0, Just right: 11, Somewhat too low: 12, Too low: 3, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 4, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 5, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 4, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 4, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 2, Most of the time: 6, Often enough: 12, Not often enough: 4, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 2

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 3, Interesting: 10, Not Interesting: 9, No opinion: 4

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 3, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 4, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 19, 75-90%: 6, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 7, No work assigned: 4, No opinion: 2

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 5, No printed course notes: 4, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 6, No text required: 2, No opinion: 4

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 18, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 21, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 3, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 4, 3-6 hours: 13, 7-10 hours: 6, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 1

55% (26 of 47) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 162

MATH127 Section 008 Waite Michael L.

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 30, Good: 28, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 20, Just right: 39, Somewhat too low: 9, Too low: 2, No opinion: 2

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 38, Good: 28, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 25, Good: 35, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 32, Good: 29, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 18, Most of the time: 21, Often enough: 11, Not often enough: 2, Never: 1, I did not seek help: 22

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 9, Interesting: 39, Not Interesting: 21, No opinion: 6

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 27, Good: 34, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 59, 75-90%: 10, 50-75%: 4, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 17, Helpful: 34, Not helpful: 11, No work assigned: 8, No opinion: 4

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 5, No printed course notes: 44, No opinion: 12

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 21, Helpful: 38, Not helpful: 12, No text required: 0, No opinion: 4

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 11, Okay: 56, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 4, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 51, Somewhat too little: 10, Too little: 1, No opinion: 2

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 15, 3-6 hours: 38, 7-10 hours: 12, 11-15 hours: 7, > 15 hours: 2

72% (75 of 104) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 163

MATH127 Section 009 Ya wney John

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 3, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 9, Just right: 8, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 1, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 9, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 2, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 3, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 7, Most of the time: 2, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 9

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 2, Interesting: 10, Not Interesting: 9, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 3, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 19, 75-90%: 1, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 3, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 5, No printed course notes: 4, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 4, No text required: 1, No opinion: 1

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 18, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 18, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 5, 3-6 hours: 12, 7-10 hours: 5, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

59% (22 of 37) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 164

MATH128 Section 001 Xiao Stanley Yao

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 0, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 14, Very poor: 22, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 20, Somewhat too high: 17, Just right: 5, Somewhat too low: 7, Too low: 6, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 3, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 24, Unsatisfactory: 7, Very poor: 9, No opinion: 2

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 1, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 18, Unsatisfactory: 11, Very poor: 14, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 2, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 19, Unsatisfactory: 13, Very poor: 10, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 7, Most of the time: 8, Often enough: 15, Not often enough: 3, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 21

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 1, Interesting: 24, Not Interesting: 25, No opinion: 3

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 1, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 15, Very poor: 21, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 37, 75-90%: 10, 50-75%: 5, 25-50%: 3, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 32, Not helpful: 13, No work assigned: 1, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 4, No printed course notes: 44, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 19, Not helpful: 6, No text required: 18, No opinion: 4

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 11, Somewhat too much: 20, Okay: 21, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 7, Somewhat too much: 14, Okay: 30, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 2, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 18, 7-10 hours: 21, 11-15 hours: 11, > 15 hours: 4

51% (55 of 108) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 165

MATH135 Section 001 Knoll Carolyn Alexis

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 22, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 8, Just right: 25, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 26, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 24, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 24, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 19, Most of the time: 8, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 6

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 19, Interesting: 15, Not Interesting: 4, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 22, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 26, 75-90%: 8, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 22, Helpful: 16, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 13, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 9, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 14, Helpful: 17, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 5, No opinion: 0

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 24, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 2

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 9, Okay: 26, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 4, 3-6 hours: 18, 7-10 hours: 9, 11-15 hours: 5, > 15 hours: 2

72% (38 of 53) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 166

MATH135 Section 002 Knoll Carolyn Alexis

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 26, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 4, Just right: 32, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 2, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 26, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 23, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 26, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 18, Most of the time: 9, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 0, Never: 2, I did not seek help: 7

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 18, Interesting: 13, Not Interesting: 4, No opinion: 4

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 28, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 31, 75-90%: 4, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 23, Helpful: 13, Not helpful: 3, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 18, Not helpful: 3, No printed course notes: 10, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 23, Not helpful: 6, No text required: 2, No opinion: 0

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 13, Okay: 18, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 1, No opinion: 2

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 12, Okay: 24, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 3, 3-6 hours: 17, 7-10 hours: 15, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 1

70% (39 of 56) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 167

MATH135 Section 003 Pretti John-Paul C

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 35, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 10, Just right: 33, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 35, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 30, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 39, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 27, Most of the time: 2, Often enough: 7, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 9

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 16, Interesting: 24, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 5

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 35, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 40, 75-90%: 4, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 23, Helpful: 21, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 20, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 12, No opinion: 6

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 18, Helpful: 16, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 9, No opinion: 2

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 8, Somewhat too much: 13, Okay: 24, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 10, Okay: 36, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 24, 7-10 hours: 19, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 0

81% (46 of 57) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 168

MATH135 Section 004 Pretti John-Paul C

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 28, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 11, Just right: 25, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 31, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 24, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 29, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 18, Most of the time: 6, Often enough: 5, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 7

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 19, Interesting: 17, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 29, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 29, 75-90%: 6, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 22, Helpful: 15, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 1, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 16, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 9, No opinion: 3

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 12, Helpful: 21, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 3, No opinion: 1

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 17, Okay: 19, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 29, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 13, 7-10 hours: 17, 11-15 hours: 5, > 15 hours: 2

69% (38 of 55) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 169

MATH135 Section 005 Akash Mukto

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 11, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 9, Just right: 26, Somewhat too low: 4, Too low: 0, No opinion: 2

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 21, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 11, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 10, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 10, Most of the time: 13, Often enough: 9, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 8

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 12, Interesting: 21, Not Interesting: 6, No opinion: 3

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 12, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 2

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 32, 75-90%: 9, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 23, Helpful: 19, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 5, No printed course notes: 13, No opinion: 5

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 22, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 7, No opinion: 1

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 6, Somewhat too much: 21, Okay: 15, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 31, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 20, 7-10 hours: 19, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 1

84% (42 of 50) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 170

MATH135 Section 006 Akash Mukto

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 15, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 3, Somewhat too high: 10, Just right: 27, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 1, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 17, Good: 22, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 13, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 15, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 13, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 1

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 16, Most of the time: 10, Often enough: 8, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 9

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 14, Interesting: 18, Not Interesting: 10, No opinion: 3

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 17, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 33, 75-90%: 8, 50-75%: 4, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 19, Helpful: 27, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 13, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 15, No opinion: 4

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 22, Helpful: 18, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 1, No opinion: 1

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 11, Somewhat too much: 14, Okay: 16, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 7, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 30, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 19, 7-10 hours: 16, 11-15 hours: 6, > 15 hours: 3

84% (46 of 55) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 171

MATH135 Section 007 Trelford Ryan

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 26, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 5, Just right: 28, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 26, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 23, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 27, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 16, Most of the time: 5, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 8

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 13, Interesting: 17, Not Interesting: 3, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 27, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 29, 75-90%: 3, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 17, Helpful: 16, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 9, No opinion: 7

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 16, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 4, No opinion: 5

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 9, Okay: 19, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 23, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 18, 7-10 hours: 10, 11-15 hours: 4, > 15 hours: 1

63% (33 of 52) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 172

MATH135 Section 008 Trelford Ryan

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 33, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 3, Somewhat too high: 5, Just right: 32, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 33, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 33, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 34, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 27, Most of the time: 5, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 7

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 20, Interesting: 18, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 2

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 36, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 39, 75-90%: 2, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 20, Helpful: 19, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 2

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 15, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 12, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 14, Helpful: 16, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 4, No opinion: 5

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 6, Somewhat too much: 12, Okay: 22, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 13, Okay: 27, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 26, 7-10 hours: 11, 11-15 hours: 4, > 15 hours: 0

76% (41 of 54) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 173

MATH135 Section 009 Bauman Shane B

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 28, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 3, Just right: 31, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 1, No opinion: 3

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 26, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 2

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 20, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 26, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 15, Most of the time: 9, Often enough: 5, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 10

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 18, Interesting: 18, Not Interesting: 2, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 26, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 31, 75-90%: 6, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 17, Helpful: 21, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 16, No opinion: 5

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 14, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 3, No text required: 1, No opinion: 6

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 10, Okay: 22, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 2

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 28, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 14, 7-10 hours: 23, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0

74% (39 of 53) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 174

MATH135 Section 010 Nelson Jennifer Anne

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 22, Good: 22, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 12, Just right: 30, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 28, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 26, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 22, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 17, Most of the time: 11, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 13

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 8, Interesting: 33, Not Interesting: 4, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 25, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 33, 75-90%: 8, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 22, Helpful: 21, Not helpful: 3, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 10, Helpful: 20, Not helpful: 4, No printed course notes: 7, No opinion: 4

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 14, Helpful: 24, Not helpful: 4, No text required: 3, No opinion: 0

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 6, Somewhat too much: 16, Okay: 22, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 38, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 20, 7-10 hours: 20, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 2

84% (46 of 55) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 175

MATH135 Section 011 Nelson Jennifer Anne

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 26, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 8, Just right: 34, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 31, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 25, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 26, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 19, Most of the time: 16, Often enough: 3, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 5

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 10, Interesting: 27, Not Interesting: 5, No opinion: 2

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 28, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 35, 75-90%: 8, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 18, Helpful: 26, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 20, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 8, No opinion: 5

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 17, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 8, No opinion: 4

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 19, Okay: 22, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 9, Okay: 32, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 26, 7-10 hours: 13, 11-15 hours: 5, > 15 hours: 0

76% (44 of 58) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 176

MATH135 Section 012 Freiberg Tristan

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 5, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 1

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 10, Just right: 8, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 3, No opinion: 2

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 5, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 4, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 4, No opinion: 2

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 3, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 6, No opinion: 1

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 3, Most of the time: 9, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 11

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 10, Interesting: 13, Not Interesting: 5, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 2, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 18, 75-90%: 6, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 19, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 3, No printed course notes: 6, No opinion: 3

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 15, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 0, No opinion: 5

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 9, Okay: 14, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 18, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 12, 7-10 hours: 10, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 2

83% (29 of 35) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 177

MATH135 Section 013 Hewitt Conrad G

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 11, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 9, Just right: 21, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 13, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 2

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 7, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 17, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 16, Most of the time: 7, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 7

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 15, Interesting: 10, Not Interesting: 6, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 14, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 25, 75-90%: 4, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 20, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 14, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 6, No opinion: 5

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 13, Okay: 13, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 22, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 2, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 4, 3-6 hours: 10, 7-10 hours: 13, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 2

58% (32 of 55) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 178

MATH135 Section 014 Nelson Jennifer Anne

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 29, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 4, Somewhat too high: 1, Just right: 39, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 35, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 26, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 29, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 22, Most of the time: 9, Often enough: 5, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 9

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 20, Interesting: 18, Not Interesting: 4, No opinion: 3

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 30, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 39, 75-90%: 3, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 27, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 3

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 19, Helpful: 19, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 5, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 17, Helpful: 13, Not helpful: 3, No text required: 7, No opinion: 4

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 12, Okay: 25, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 33, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 4, 3-6 hours: 33, 7-10 hours: 7, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0

78% (45 of 58) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 179

MATH135 Section 015 Bruni Carmen Anthony

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 22, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 11, Just right: 25, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 22, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 15, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 20, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 16, Most of the time: 5, Often enough: 6, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 11

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 19, Interesting: 16, Not Interesting: 2, No opinion: 2

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 22, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 33, 75-90%: 6, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 19, Helpful: 19, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 16, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 10, No opinion: 3

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 21, Not helpful: 3, No text required: 4, No opinion: 3

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 21, Okay: 14, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 28, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 24, 7-10 hours: 11, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 0

70% (39 of 56) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 180

MATH135 Section 016 Bruni Carmen Anthony

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 21, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 6, Just right: 27, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 22, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 19, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 24, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 20, Most of the time: 8, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 3

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 11, Interesting: 17, Not Interesting: 5, No opinion: 2

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 25, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 27, 75-90%: 7, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 21, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 10, Helpful: 15, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 4, No opinion: 3

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 3, No text required: 5, No opinion: 4

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 22, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 24, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 20, 7-10 hours: 11, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 0

78% (35 of 45) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 181

MATH135 Section 017 Marcott Cameron

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 1, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 6, Just right: 12, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 1, No opinion: 2

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 5, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 2, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 7, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 4, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 0, Most of the time: 7, Often enough: 7, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 10

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 3, Interesting: 13, Not Interesting: 4, No opinion: 4

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 1, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 7, 75-90%: 13, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 2, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 15, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 3, No printed course notes: 14, No opinion: 0

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 3, No opinion: 2

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 15, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 17, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 8, 7-10 hours: 12, 11-15 hours: 4, > 15 hours: 0

60% (24 of 40) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 182

MATH135 Section 018 Koeller Judith Ann

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 26, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 6, Just right: 32, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 24, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 26, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 19, Good: 22, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 15, Most of the time: 13, Often enough: 6, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 8

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 16, Interesting: 22, Not Interesting: 3, No opinion: 2

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 24, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 30, 75-90%: 12, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 17, Helpful: 25, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 21, Helpful: 17, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 4

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 15, Helpful: 22, Not helpful: 3, No text required: 2, No opinion: 2

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 7, Somewhat too much: 9, Okay: 28, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 36, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 30, 7-10 hours: 9, 11-15 hours: 5, > 15 hours: 0

75% (44 of 59) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 183

MATH135 Section 019 Koeller Judith Ann

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 27, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 6, Just right: 29, Somewhat too low: 4, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 20, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 23, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 25, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 14, Most of the time: 15, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 11

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 16, Interesting: 16, Not Interesting: 5, No opinion: 5

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 23, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 35, 75-90%: 4, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 2, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 22, Helpful: 16, Not helpful: 3, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 21, Helpful: 18, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 14, Helpful: 16, Not helpful: 7, No text required: 2, No opinion: 3

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 7, Somewhat too much: 20, Okay: 15, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 10, Okay: 28, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 19, 7-10 hours: 15, 11-15 hours: 6, > 15 hours: 0

74% (42 of 57) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 184

MATH135 Section 020 Bauman Shane B

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 22, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 8, Just right: 34, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 24, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 24, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 24, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 12, Most of the time: 12, Often enough: 5, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 13

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 17, Interesting: 21, Not Interesting: 4, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 23, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 37, 75-90%: 4, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 21, Helpful: 18, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 13, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 19, No opinion: 4

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 16, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 6, No opinion: 4

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 17, Okay: 21, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 33, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 15, 7-10 hours: 20, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 2

76% (42 of 55) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 185

MATH135 Section 021 Bauman Shane B

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 26, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 6, Just right: 33, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 28, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 22, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 26, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 17, Most of the time: 10, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 9

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 16, Interesting: 19, Not Interesting: 2, No opinion: 3

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 23, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 37, 75-90%: 1, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 23, Helpful: 17, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 10, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 12, No opinion: 6

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 14, Helpful: 17, Not helpful: 4, No text required: 4, No opinion: 1

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 8, Somewhat too much: 11, Okay: 21, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 13, Okay: 24, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 23, 7-10 hours: 12, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 3

77% (41 of 53) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 186

MATH135 Section 022 Garbary Robert

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 10, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 3, Just right: 26, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 22, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 12, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 14, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 18, Most of the time: 8, Often enough: 3, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 4

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 9, Interesting: 22, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 17, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 24, 75-90%: 7, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 18, Helpful: 15, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 9, No opinion: 4

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 13, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 4, No text required: 6, No opinion: 4

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 13, Okay: 18, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 24, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 4, 3-6 hours: 14, 7-10 hours: 11, 11-15 hours: 4, > 15 hours: 0

79% (33 of 42) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 187

MATH135 Section 023 VanderBurgh Ian W T

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 43, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 3, Somewhat too high: 5, Just right: 42, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 48, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 37, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 43, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 27, Most of the time: 10, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 11

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 26, Interesting: 21, Not Interesting: 2, No opinion: 2

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 44, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 39, 75-90%: 10, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 32, Helpful: 18, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 33, Helpful: 13, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 2, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 16, Helpful: 17, Not helpful: 5, No text required: 7, No opinion: 5

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 14, Okay: 31, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 11, Okay: 38, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 23, 7-10 hours: 19, 11-15 hours: 4, > 15 hours: 3

89% (51 of 57) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 188

MATH135 Section 024 Liu Yu-Ru

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 27, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 4, Somewhat too high: 4, Just right: 30, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 31, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 28, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 19, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 22, Most of the time: 7, Often enough: 3, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 6

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 21, Interesting: 13, Not Interesting: 4, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 30, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 35, 75-90%: 1, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 24, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 14, No opinion: 4

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 5, No text required: 2, No opinion: 6

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 10, Okay: 22, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 29, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 6, 3-6 hours: 18, 7-10 hours: 12, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 1

67% (39 of 58) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 189

MATH135 Section 025 Garbary Robert

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 16, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 7, Just right: 28, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 21, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 15, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 20, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 20, Most of the time: 11, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 5

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 14, Interesting: 24, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 18, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 30, 75-90%: 6, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 14, Helpful: 23, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 18, No opinion: 3

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 20, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 5, No opinion: 3

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 15, Okay: 20, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 9, Okay: 26, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 3, 3-6 hours: 20, 7-10 hours: 14, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0

76% (38 of 50) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 190

MATH135 Section 026 Thompson Alan Matthew

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 27, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 11, Just right: 26, Somewhat too low: 4, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 29, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 24, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 29, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 20, Most of the time: 8, Often enough: 3, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 11

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 10, Interesting: 23, Not Interesting: 9, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 28, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 35, 75-90%: 7, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 23, Helpful: 15, Not helpful: 5, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 4, No printed course notes: 17, No opinion: 4

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 13, Helpful: 18, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 4, No opinion: 6

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 8, Somewhat too much: 19, Okay: 15, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 14, Okay: 24, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 3, 3-6 hours: 13, 7-10 hours: 24, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 0

75% (43 of 57) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 191

MATH136 Section 001 Vicente Colmenares Alejandra

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 23, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 1

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 4, Just right: 42, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 2, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 27, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 19, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 19, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 18, Most of the time: 16, Often enough: 7, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 11

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 12, Interesting: 31, Not Interesting: 8, No opinion: 2

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 22, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 2

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 29, 75-90%: 14, 50-75%: 4, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 3

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 27, Helpful: 25, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 17, Helpful: 16, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 12, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 25, Helpful: 20, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 3, No opinion: 3

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 13, Okay: 35, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 2, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 45, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 9, 3-6 hours: 33, 7-10 hours: 9, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0

45% (53 of 118) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 192

MATH136 Section 002 Wood Peter J

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 21, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 2

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 1, Just right: 32, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 2

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 23, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 2

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 17, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 2

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 21, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 2

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 10, Most of the time: 9, Often enough: 6, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 11

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 13, Interesting: 16, Not Interesting: 3, No opinion: 4

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 21, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 21, 75-90%: 10, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 19, Helpful: 16, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 12, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 6, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 15, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 3, No opinion: 4

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 25, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 2

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 31, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 2

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 4, 3-6 hours: 25, 7-10 hours: 6, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0

38% (36 of 96) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 193

MATH136 Section 003 McGrath Paul

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 11, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 3, Just right: 11, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 14, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 8, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 10, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 6, Most of the time: 6, Often enough: 1, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 4

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 7, Interesting: 8, Not Interesting: 2, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 11, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 14, 75-90%: 3, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 4, No opinion: 4

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 13, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 0, No opinion: 1

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 12, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 14, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 12, 7-10 hours: 5, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

41% (18 of 44) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 194

MATH137 Section 001 D’Alessio Serge

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 42, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 10, Just right: 35, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 35, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 35, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 43, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 27, Most of the time: 8, Often enough: 1, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 12

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 13, Interesting: 30, Not Interesting: 4, No opinion: 2

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 42, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 43, 75-90%: 6, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 27, Not helpful: 15, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 20, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 16, No opinion: 4

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 21, Not helpful: 11, No text required: 3, No opinion: 7

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 36, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 34, Somewhat too little: 10, Too little: 4, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 8, 3-6 hours: 34, 7-10 hours: 4, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 1

88% (49 of 56) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 195

MATH137 Section 002 Ferguson Barry

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 40, Good: 37, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 10, Somewhat too high: 23, Just right: 54, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 2, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 42, Good: 34, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 41, Good: 31, Satisfactory: 18, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 36, Good: 45, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 22, Most of the time: 18, Often enough: 22, Not often enough: 10, Never: 2, I did not seek help: 17

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 15, Interesting: 59, Not Interesting: 14, No opinion: 6

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 32, Good: 48, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 57, 75-90%: 27, 50-75%: 6, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 27, Helpful: 59, Not helpful: 7, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 2

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 10, Helpful: 31, Not helpful: 3, No printed course notes: 37, No opinion: 7

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 38, Helpful: 51, Not helpful: 3, No text required: 1, No opinion: 2

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 19, Okay: 60, Somewhat too little: 4, Too little: 4, No opinion: 2

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 13, Okay: 74, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 16, 3-6 hours: 44, 7-10 hours: 26, 11-15 hours: 4, > 15 hours: 4

56% (95 of 170) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 196

MATH137 Section 003 Forouzannia Farinaz

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 6, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 40, Unsatisfactory: 14, Very poor: 7, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 14, Just right: 47, Somewhat too low: 14, Too low: 4, No opinion: 4

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 21, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 29, Unsatisfactory: 8, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 3

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 6, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 32, Unsatisfactory: 21, Very poor: 10, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 6, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 37, Unsatisfactory: 20, Very poor: 11, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 19, Most of the time: 21, Often enough: 16, Not often enough: 3, Never: 1, I did not seek help: 25

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 3, Interesting: 37, Not Interesting: 36, No opinion: 10

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 4, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 37, Unsatisfactory: 15, Very poor: 6, No opinion: 1

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 39, 75-90%: 20, 50-75%: 16, 25-50%: 5, < 25%: 6

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 23, Helpful: 45, Not helpful: 14, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 4

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 16, Not helpful: 5, No printed course notes: 52, No opinion: 9

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 41, Helpful: 35, Not helpful: 3, No text required: 6, No opinion: 1

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 12, Okay: 58, Somewhat too little: 5, Too little: 3, No opinion: 5

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 70, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 7, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 9, 3-6 hours: 63, 7-10 hours: 13, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0

77% (86 of 112) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 197

MATH137 Section 004 Hewitt Conrad G

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 34, Good: 37, Satisfactory: 23, Unsatisfactory: 11, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 4, Somewhat too high: 39, Just right: 51, Somewhat too low: 10, Too low: 0, No opinion: 2

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 29, Good: 40, Satisfactory: 24, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 6, No opinion: 2

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 22, Good: 28, Satisfactory: 29, Unsatisfactory: 19, Very poor: 6, No opinion: 2

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 40, Good: 35, Satisfactory: 24, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 2

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 32, Most of the time: 19, Often enough: 14, Not often enough: 1, Never: 1, I did not seek help: 39

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 20, Interesting: 58, Not Interesting: 19, No opinion: 10

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 38, Good: 31, Satisfactory: 26, Unsatisfactory: 8, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 3

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 76, 75-90%: 21, 50-75%: 5, 25-50%: 4, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 24, Helpful: 55, Not helpful: 27, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 27, Not helpful: 3, No printed course notes: 49, No opinion: 14

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 33, Helpful: 57, Not helpful: 10, No text required: 2, No opinion: 4

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 17, Okay: 82, Somewhat too little: 4, Too little: 1, No opinion: 3

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 9, Okay: 80, Somewhat too little: 10, Too little: 5, No opinion: 2

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 11, 3-6 hours: 74, 7-10 hours: 19, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 1

69% (107 of 155) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 198

MATH137 Section 005 Eden Michael Charles

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 121, Good: 22, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 7, Somewhat too high: 17, Just right: 118, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 91, Good: 44, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 103, Good: 39, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 129, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 55, Most of the time: 39, Often enough: 14, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 37

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 51, Interesting: 79, Not Interesting: 6, No opinion: 9

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 122, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 118, 75-90%: 22, 50-75%: 4, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 26, Helpful: 88, Not helpful: 25, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 6

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 32, Helpful: 68, Not helpful: 4, No printed course notes: 29, No opinion: 11

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 28, Helpful: 74, Not helpful: 21, No text required: 7, No opinion: 14

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 6, Somewhat too much: 25, Okay: 100, Somewhat too little: 6, Too little: 3, No opinion: 5

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 9, Okay: 118, Somewhat too little: 8, Too little: 5, No opinion: 3

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 21, 3-6 hours: 102, 7-10 hours: 21, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0

85% (145 of 170) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 199

MATH137 Section 006 Sivaloganathan Sivabal

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 22, Good: 38, Satisfactory: 30, Unsatisfactory: 8, Very poor: 5, No opinion: 1

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 9, Somewhat too high: 31, Just right: 47, Somewhat too low: 12, Too low: 1, No opinion: 2

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 35, Good: 32, Satisfactory: 27, Unsatisfactory: 7, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 2

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 29, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 31, Unsatisfactory: 11, Very poor: 8, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 22, Good: 38, Satisfactory: 26, Unsatisfactory: 13, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 1

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 18, Most of the time: 23, Often enough: 18, Not often enough: 7, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 34

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 20, Interesting: 44, Not Interesting: 31, No opinion: 9

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 24, Good: 35, Satisfactory: 25, Unsatisfactory: 10, Very poor: 6, No opinion: 2

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 68, 75-90%: 21, 50-75%: 8, 25-50%: 3, < 25%: 4

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 17, Helpful: 58, Not helpful: 25, No work assigned: 1, No opinion: 3

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 7, No printed course notes: 58, No opinion: 13

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 34, Helpful: 52, Not helpful: 9, No text required: 2, No opinion: 6

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 16, Okay: 71, Somewhat too little: 9, Too little: 2, No opinion: 2

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 72, Somewhat too little: 15, Too little: 7, No opinion: 1

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 27, 3-6 hours: 62, 7-10 hours: 9, 11-15 hours: 4, > 15 hours: 1

71% (104 of 147) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 200

MATH137 Section 007 Gamache Alain

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 33, Good: 59, Satisfactory: 13, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 6, Somewhat too high: 22, Just right: 70, Somewhat too low: 9, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 55, Good: 36, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 44, Good: 39, Satisfactory: 25, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 37, Good: 51, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 54, Most of the time: 20, Often enough: 15, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 18

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 23, Interesting: 64, Not Interesting: 17, No opinion: 5

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 41, Good: 50, Satisfactory: 13, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 74, 75-90%: 19, 50-75%: 10, 25-50%: 3, < 25%: 3

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 23, Helpful: 61, Not helpful: 24, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 27, Helpful: 35, Not helpful: 6, No printed course notes: 31, No opinion: 8

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 29, Helpful: 49, Not helpful: 18, No text required: 4, No opinion: 9

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 9, Somewhat too much: 32, Okay: 58, Somewhat too little: 5, Too little: 3, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 83, Somewhat too little: 13, Too little: 3, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 16, 3-6 hours: 80, 7-10 hours: 9, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 2

76% (109 of 144) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 201

MATH137 Section 008 Park Doug

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 54, Good: 38, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 3, Somewhat too high: 23, Just right: 72, Somewhat too low: 7, Too low: 2, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 34, Good: 47, Satisfactory: 22, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 62, Good: 30, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 38, Good: 48, Satisfactory: 19, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 16, Most of the time: 28, Often enough: 22, Not often enough: 6, Never: 1, I did not seek help: 32

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 15, Interesting: 61, Not Interesting: 21, No opinion: 10

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 40, Good: 48, Satisfactory: 17, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 78, 75-90%: 26, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 20, Helpful: 72, Not helpful: 12, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 3

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 13, Helpful: 17, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 59, No opinion: 11

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 25, Helpful: 61, Not helpful: 16, No text required: 1, No opinion: 5

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 13, Okay: 79, Somewhat too little: 8, Too little: 3, No opinion: 2

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 9, Okay: 85, Somewhat too little: 11, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 12, 3-6 hours: 72, 7-10 hours: 22, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 1

63% (108 of 172) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 202

MATH137 Section 009 Dupuis Maite

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 8, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 41, Unsatisfactory: 28, Very poor: 13, No opinion: 1

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 4, Somewhat too high: 21, Just right: 33, Somewhat too low: 32, Too low: 8, No opinion: 12

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 14, Good: 40, Satisfactory: 30, Unsatisfactory: 14, Very poor: 10, No opinion: 3

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 5, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 37, Unsatisfactory: 37, Very poor: 11, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 5, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 31, Unsatisfactory: 38, Very poor: 24, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 24, Most of the time: 15, Often enough: 28, Not often enough: 6, Never: 1, I did not seek help: 37

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 4, Interesting: 47, Not Interesting: 52, No opinion: 8

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 5, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 31, Unsatisfactory: 38, Very poor: 17, No opinion: 2

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 71, 75-90%: 20, 50-75%: 10, 25-50%: 8, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 15, Helpful: 50, Not helpful: 44, No work assigned: 1, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 23, Helpful: 46, Not helpful: 13, No printed course notes: 23, No opinion: 6

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 41, Helpful: 46, Not helpful: 11, No text required: 5, No opinion: 7

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 10, Okay: 82, Somewhat too little: 8, Too little: 6, No opinion: 2

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 88, Somewhat too little: 13, Too little: 4, No opinion: 1

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 19, 3-6 hours: 67, 7-10 hours: 20, 11-15 hours: 4, > 15 hours: 1

77% (111 of 145) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 203

MATH137 Section 010 Poulin Francis

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 31, Good: 42, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 4, Somewhat too high: 21, Just right: 54, Somewhat too low: 7, Too low: 1, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 64, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 30, Good: 37, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 26, Good: 40, Satisfactory: 17, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 26, Most of the time: 22, Often enough: 8, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 30

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 24, Interesting: 50, Not Interesting: 8, No opinion: 6

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 41, Good: 37, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 71, 75-90%: 8, 50-75%: 4, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 2

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 37, Helpful: 45, Not helpful: 5, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 16, Helpful: 28, Not helpful: 3, No printed course notes: 22, No opinion: 16

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 30, Helpful: 36, Not helpful: 11, No text required: 2, No opinion: 8

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 11, Okay: 61, Somewhat too little: 10, Too little: 4, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 9, Okay: 72, Somewhat too little: 4, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 10, 3-6 hours: 65, 7-10 hours: 10, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0

73% (88 of 121) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 204

MATH138 Section 001 Hamilton Jordan

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 46, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 7, Just right: 47, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 46, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 41, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 39, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 27, Most of the time: 9, Often enough: 3, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 13

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 23, Interesting: 27, Not Interesting: 2, No opinion: 4

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 45, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 41, 75-90%: 12, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 30, Helpful: 26, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 21, Helpful: 15, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 16, No opinion: 3

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 24, Not helpful: 5, No text required: 8, No opinion: 11

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 13, Okay: 39, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 47, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 5, 3-6 hours: 33, 7-10 hours: 12, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 1

51% (56 of 110) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 205

MATH138 Section 002 Fagerstrom Emily

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 14, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 10, Just right: 30, Somewhat too low: 4, Too low: 0, No opinion: 4

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 23, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 3

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 15, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 20, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 2

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 9, Most of the time: 11, Often enough: 7, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 22

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 7, Interesting: 31, Not Interesting: 8, No opinion: 4

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 16, Good: 21, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 3

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 37, 75-90%: 7, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 23, Helpful: 26, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 30, No opinion: 5

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 15, Helpful: 18, Not helpful: 3, No text required: 6, No opinion: 8

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 19, Okay: 26, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 40, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 37, 7-10 hours: 10, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 0

49% (50 of 102) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 206

MATH138 Section 003 Vinette Francine

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 7, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 9, Just right: 25, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 11, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 9, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 8, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 7, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 12, Most of the time: 5, Often enough: 9, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 9

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 5, Interesting: 18, Not Interesting: 13, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 6, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 25, 75-90%: 6, 50-75%: 5, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 16, Helpful: 20, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 13, No opinion: 3

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 22, Not helpful: 3, No text required: 1, No opinion: 1

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 10, Okay: 26, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 31, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 22, 7-10 hours: 13, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

41% (37 of 90) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 207

MATH145 Section 001 New Stephen

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 30, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 4, Somewhat too high: 6, Just right: 27, Somewhat too low: 5, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 27, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 20, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 27, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 22, Most of the time: 8, Often enough: 3, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 10

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 27, Interesting: 14, Not Interesting: 3, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 29, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 32, 75-90%: 9, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 30, Helpful: 13, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 1, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 20, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 10, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 4, No text required: 20, No opinion: 5

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 30, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 2, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 9, Okay: 30, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 13, 7-10 hours: 16, 11-15 hours: 11, > 15 hours: 3

54% (44 of 82) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 208

MATH147 Section 001 McKinnon David

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 46, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 5, Somewhat too high: 9, Just right: 48, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 47, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 41, Good: 22, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 57, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 31, Most of the time: 9, Often enough: 5, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 19

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 39, Interesting: 25, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 53, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 44, 75-90%: 12, 50-75%: 7, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 2

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 34, Helpful: 27, Not helpful: 3, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 50, No opinion: 3

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 14, Helpful: 29, Not helpful: 4, No text required: 9, No opinion: 9

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 52, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 19, Okay: 40, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 12, 7-10 hours: 27, 11-15 hours: 14, > 15 hours: 12

77% (66 of 86) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 209

MATH207 Section 001 Smith Paula T.

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 2, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 3, Just right: 5, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 3, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 2, Good: 1, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 5, Good: 1, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 2, Most of the time: 2, Often enough: 1, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 2

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 3, Interesting: 3, Not Interesting: 2, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 4, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 6, 75-90%: 2, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 3, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 0, No opinion: 0

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 5, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 4, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 6, 7-10 hours: 1, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 1

33% (8 of 24) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 210

MATH225 Section 001 Hartz Michael Peter

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 15, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 2, Just right: 18, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 17, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 7, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 12, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 10, Most of the time: 7, Often enough: 1, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 4

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 3, Interesting: 17, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 15, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 12, 75-90%: 8, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 10, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 12, No opinion: 4

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 2, No opinion: 2

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 16, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 20, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 19, 7-10 hours: 2, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

55% (22 of 40) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 211

MATH227 Section 001 Marshman Beverly J

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 38, Good: 21, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 6, Somewhat too high: 18, Just right: 45, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 3

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 44, Good: 21, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 44, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 44, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 17, Most of the time: 13, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 3, Never: 1, I did not seek help: 34

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 24, Interesting: 33, Not Interesting: 14, No opinion: 3

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 40, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 2

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 57, 75-90%: 7, 50-75%: 7, 25-50%: 2, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 33, Helpful: 37, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 2

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 13, Helpful: 31, Not helpful: 6, No printed course notes: 16, No opinion: 8

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 29, Helpful: 32, Not helpful: 7, No text required: 1, No opinion: 4

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 13, Somewhat too much: 25, Okay: 35, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 10, Somewhat too much: 21, Okay: 42, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 35, 7-10 hours: 29, 11-15 hours: 6, > 15 hours: 1

72% (74 of 103) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 212

MATH228 Section 001 Beltaos Andrew

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 36, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 3, Just right: 57, Somewhat too low: 5, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 39, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 23, Good: 26, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 41, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 20, Most of the time: 13, Often enough: 7, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 26

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 21, Interesting: 34, Not Interesting: 8, No opinion: 3

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 40, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 50, 75-90%: 7, 50-75%: 6, 25-50%: 2, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 39, Helpful: 27, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 12, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 32, No opinion: 10

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 14, No text required: 7, No opinion: 25

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 11, Okay: 51, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 56, Somewhat too little: 6, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 7, 3-6 hours: 47, 7-10 hours: 10, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0

69% (68 of 99) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 213

MATH229 Section 001 Pei Martin

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 3, Good: 1, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 0, Just right: 5, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 1, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 2, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 0, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 1, Most of the time: 1, Often enough: 0, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 3

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 2, Interesting: 2, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 2, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 3, 75-90%: 2, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 0, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 3, No opinion: 2

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 5, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 5, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 4, 7-10 hours: 1, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

36% (5 of 14) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 214

MATH235 Section 001 Wolczuk Dan Sean Terry

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 59, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 3, Somewhat too high: 16, Just right: 48, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 56, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 48, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 57, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 30, Most of the time: 8, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 2, Never: 1, I did not seek help: 25

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 14, Interesting: 37, Not Interesting: 15, No opinion: 2

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 59, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 55, 75-90%: 11, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 20, Helpful: 46, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 19, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 28, No opinion: 5

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 26, Helpful: 27, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 8, No opinion: 4

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 10, Somewhat too much: 14, Okay: 40, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 10, Okay: 50, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 6, 3-6 hours: 42, 7-10 hours: 14, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 3

70% (68 of 97) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 215

MATH235 Section 002 Szpojankowski Kamil

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 10, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 3, Just right: 12, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 6, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 4, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 4, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 4, Most of the time: 2, Often enough: 1, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 10

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 6, Interesting: 8, Not Interesting: 3, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 7, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 8, 75-90%: 6, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 7, No opinion: 0

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 2, No opinion: 0

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 14, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 16, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 12, 7-10 hours: 4, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

29% (17 of 58) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 216

MATH235 Section 003 Stephenson Jonathan

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 16, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 13, Just right: 36, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 17, Good: 25, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 7, Good: 25, Satisfactory: 13, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 14, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 7, Most of the time: 9, Often enough: 9, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 27

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 11, Interesting: 26, Not Interesting: 12, No opinion: 4

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 16, Good: 22, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 33, 75-90%: 13, 50-75%: 5, 25-50%: 2, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 18, Helpful: 33, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 13, Helpful: 16, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 18, No opinion: 3

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 24, Helpful: 21, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 5, No opinion: 1

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 13, Okay: 31, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 2

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 46, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 3, 3-6 hours: 34, 7-10 hours: 13, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 1

55% (53 of 97) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 217

MATH235 Section 004 Satriano Matthew

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 16, Good: 22, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 8, Just right: 31, Somewhat too low: 5, Too low: 0, No opinion: 3

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 23, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 2

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 13, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 16, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 9, Most of the time: 6, Often enough: 6, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 25

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 14, Interesting: 28, Not Interesting: 7, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 19, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 30, 75-90%: 11, 50-75%: 6, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 22, Helpful: 25, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 1, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 20, Helpful: 13, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 12, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 27, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 5, No opinion: 5

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 11, Okay: 31, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 42, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 2

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 3, 3-6 hours: 36, 7-10 hours: 8, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 1

49% (49 of 100) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 218

MATH235 Section 005 Wolczuk Dan Sean Terry

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 62, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 3, Somewhat too high: 13, Just right: 52, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 60, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 52, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 63, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 30, Most of the time: 11, Often enough: 5, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 23

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 24, Interesting: 36, Not Interesting: 6, No opinion: 3

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 58, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 60, 75-90%: 9, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 34, Helpful: 35, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 25, Helpful: 24, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 17, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 34, Helpful: 20, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 12, No opinion: 3

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 10, Okay: 53, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 59, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 6, 3-6 hours: 47, 7-10 hours: 12, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 3

68% (69 of 101) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 219

MATH237 Section 001 West Joseph John

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 41, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 4, Somewhat too high: 6, Just right: 47, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 38, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 43, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 48, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 12, Most of the time: 16, Often enough: 7, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 23

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 16, Interesting: 38, Not Interesting: 2, No opinion: 3

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 48, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 52, 75-90%: 6, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 30, Helpful: 29, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 14, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 22, No opinion: 6

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 20, Helpful: 22, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 9, No opinion: 6

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 14, Okay: 41, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 51, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 3, 3-6 hours: 43, 7-10 hours: 12, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0

59% (59 of 100) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 220

MATH237 Section 002 Wolczuk Dan Sean Terry

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 63, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 4, Somewhat too high: 5, Just right: 57, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 52, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 50, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 64, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 38, Most of the time: 6, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 20

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 27, Interesting: 32, Not Interesting: 3, No opinion: 4

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 60, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 53, 75-90%: 12, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 31, Helpful: 32, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 1, No opinion: 2

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 15, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 29, No opinion: 8

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 20, Helpful: 32, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 4, No opinion: 8

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 16, Okay: 42, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 56, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 9, 3-6 hours: 43, 7-10 hours: 11, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 1

64% (66 of 103) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 221

MATH237 Section 003 Roh Patrick Young

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 21, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 15, Just right: 26, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 14, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 16, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 25, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 6, Most of the time: 3, Often enough: 8, Not often enough: 3, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 27

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 13, Interesting: 28, Not Interesting: 5, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 19, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 36, 75-90%: 9, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 20, Helpful: 25, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 5, No printed course notes: 21, No opinion: 4

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 18, Helpful: 20, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 7, No opinion: 0

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 34, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 37, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 34, 7-10 hours: 9, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 0

49% (47 of 95) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 222

MATH237 Section 004 Krivodonova Lilia

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 14, Good: 21, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 9, Just right: 35, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 1, No opinion: 3

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 20, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 2

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 14, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 16, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 13, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 5, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 7, Most of the time: 6, Often enough: 8, Not often enough: 4, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 25

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 12, Interesting: 31, Not Interesting: 3, No opinion: 4

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 16, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 35, 75-90%: 12, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 25, Helpful: 23, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 15, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 15, No opinion: 7

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 20, Helpful: 19, Not helpful: 3, No text required: 5, No opinion: 3

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 11, Okay: 34, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 40, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 3, 3-6 hours: 32, 7-10 hours: 9, 11-15 hours: 4, > 15 hours: 2

51% (50 of 99) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 223

MATH237 Section 005 Alburquerque Fernando

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 5, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 9, Very poor: 5, No opinion: 2

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 3, Just right: 27, Somewhat too low: 8, Too low: 3, No opinion: 3

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 8, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 21, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 2

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 3, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 18, Unsatisfactory: 8, Very poor: 6, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 3, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 16, Unsatisfactory: 11, Very poor: 7, No opinion: 1

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 8, Most of the time: 6, Often enough: 8, Not often enough: 3, Never: 1, I did not seek help: 19

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 6, Interesting: 27, Not Interesting: 7, No opinion: 6

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 5, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 13, Unsatisfactory: 8, Very poor: 7, No opinion: 2

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 24, 75-90%: 13, 50-75%: 5, 25-50%: 2, < 25%: 2

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 10, Helpful: 33, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 20, No opinion: 7

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 15, Helpful: 17, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 6, No opinion: 7

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 10, Okay: 32, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 41, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 31, 7-10 hours: 11, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 1

48% (46 of 95) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 224

MATH239 Section 001 Leung Debbie

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 13, Good: 22, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 10, Just right: 24, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 2

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 18, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 3

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 18, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 9, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 13, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 10, Most of the time: 14, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 10

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 15, Interesting: 19, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 5

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 13, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 26, 75-90%: 14, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 24, Helpful: 15, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 19, Not helpful: 5, No printed course notes: 1, No opinion: 5

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 14, No opinion: 8

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 27, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 2

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 35, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 26, 7-10 hours: 9, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 1

51% (40 of 78) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 225

MATH239 Section 002 Haxell Penny E.

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 28, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 4, Somewhat too high: 10, Just right: 34, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 27, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 2

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 24, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 2

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 25, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 8, Most of the time: 5, Often enough: 6, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 30

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 17, Interesting: 26, Not Interesting: 5, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 28, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 2

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 41, 75-90%: 6, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 22, Helpful: 21, Not helpful: 4, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 2

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 10, No printed course notes: 11, No opinion: 9

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 8, No text required: 25, No opinion: 7

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 8, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 33, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 39, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 35, 7-10 hours: 14, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

54% (50 of 92) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 226

MATH239 Section 003 Pei Martin

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 54, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 8, Just right: 51, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 45, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 2

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 48, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 46, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 18, Most of the time: 10, Often enough: 6, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 30

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 39, Interesting: 19, Not Interesting: 4, No opinion: 2

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 52, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 55, 75-90%: 6, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 33, Helpful: 26, Not helpful: 3, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 21, Not helpful: 10, No printed course notes: 9, No opinion: 17

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 4, No text required: 25, No opinion: 16

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 15, Okay: 41, Somewhat too little: 4, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 53, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 6, 3-6 hours: 39, 7-10 hours: 17, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0

71% (64 of 90) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 227

MATH239 Section 004 Haxell Penny E.

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 28, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 4, Somewhat too high: 18, Just right: 27, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 27, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 25, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 30, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 7, Most of the time: 6, Often enough: 11, Not often enough: 1, Never: 1, I did not seek help: 25

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 16, Interesting: 24, Not Interesting: 10, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 27, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 41, 75-90%: 8, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 24, Helpful: 23, Not helpful: 4, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 23, Not helpful: 12, No printed course notes: 4, No opinion: 3

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 13, Not helpful: 3, No text required: 27, No opinion: 5

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 6, Somewhat too much: 16, Okay: 28, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 11, Okay: 37, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 27, 7-10 hours: 18, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 3

55% (51 of 92) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 228

MATH245 Section 001 Purbhoo Kevin

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 8, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 4, Just right: 11, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 5, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 4, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 7, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 1, Most of the time: 2, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 7

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 10, Interesting: 4, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 10, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 14, 75-90%: 0, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 12, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 0, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 15, No opinion: 0

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 7, No opinion: 3

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 13, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 14, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 5, 7-10 hours: 8, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 0

71% (15 of 21) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 229

MATH247 Section 001 Siegel David

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 5, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 4, Just right: 17, Somewhat too low: 4, Too low: 2, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 16, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 2

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 13, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 3, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 10, Most of the time: 4, Often enough: 1, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 12

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 11, Interesting: 12, Not Interesting: 5, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 7, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 14, 75-90%: 11, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 16, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 3, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 15, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 3, No printed course notes: 2, No opinion: 0

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 18, No opinion: 2

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 18, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 2, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 22, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 10, 7-10 hours: 16, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 0

81% (29 of 36) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 230

MATH249 Section 001 Purbhoo Kevin

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 22, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 2, Just right: 25, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 13, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 13, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 20, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 5, Most of the time: 7, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 1, Never: 1, I did not seek help: 13

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 24, Interesting: 7, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 24, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 26, 75-90%: 4, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 25, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 3, No printed course notes: 10, No opinion: 4

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 25, No opinion: 2

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 28, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 25, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 14, 7-10 hours: 14, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 1

89% (31 of 35) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 231

MTHEL131 Section 001 Kohler, David

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 51, Good: 48, Satisfactory: 16, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 3, Somewhat too high: 13, Just right: 97, Somewhat too low: 4, Too low: 3, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 59, Good: 39, Satisfactory: 16, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 2

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 31, Good: 40, Satisfactory: 30, Unsatisfactory: 11, Very poor: 5, No opinion: 2

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 63, Good: 39, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 16, Most of the time: 16, Often enough: 23, Not often enough: 14, Never: 3, I did not seek help: 47

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 41, Interesting: 51, Not Interesting: 23, No opinion: 4

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 55, Good: 39, Satisfactory: 19, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 104, 75-90%: 11, 50-75%: 5, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 63, Not helpful: 27, No work assigned: 6, No opinion: 15

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 25, Not helpful: 7, No printed course notes: 70, No opinion: 11

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 49, Not helpful: 42, No text required: 3, No opinion: 15

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 6, Somewhat too much: 23, Okay: 87, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 2

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 96, Somewhat too little: 5, Too little: 0, No opinion: 8

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 74, 3-6 hours: 40, 7-10 hours: 4, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

60% (120 of 199) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 232

PMATH330 Section 001 Payne Ian

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 10, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 1, Just right: 11, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 11, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 6, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 8, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 8, Most of the time: 4, Often enough: 0, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 4

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 3, Interesting: 13, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 7, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 9, 75-90%: 5, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 1, No opinion: 0

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 10, No opinion: 0

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 14, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 13, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 11, 7-10 hours: 2, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0

42% (16 of 38) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 233

PMATH336 Section 001 Ghaswala Tyrone

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 15, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 3, Just right: 12, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 16, Good: 1, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 13, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 16, Good: 1, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 13, Most of the time: 2, Often enough: 0, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 2

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 12, Interesting: 5, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 16, Good: 1, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 13, 75-90%: 2, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 2, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 12, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 2, No opinion: 3

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 0, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 17, No opinion: 0

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 14, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 2

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 16, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 8, 7-10 hours: 8, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 1

82% (18 of 22) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 234

PMATH340 Section 001 Kuo Wentang

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 14, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 10, Just right: 28, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 22, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 3, Good: 26, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 5, Good: 21, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 9, Most of the time: 8, Often enough: 9, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 16

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 9, Interesting: 28, Not Interesting: 3, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 14, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 30, 75-90%: 7, 50-75%: 5, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 22, Helpful: 18, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 28, No opinion: 4

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 5, No text required: 3, No opinion: 13

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 32, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 0, No opinion: 2

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 33, Somewhat too little: 6, Too little: 2, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 6, 3-6 hours: 32, 7-10 hours: 2, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0

67% (42 of 63) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 235

PMATH347 Section 001 Moosa Rahim

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 15, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 5, Just right: 19, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 14, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 11, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 17, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 3, Most of the time: 2, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 4, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 14

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 13, Interesting: 12, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 13, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 23, 75-90%: 2, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 10, Helpful: 16, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 0, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 26, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 17, No opinion: 5

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 17, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 2

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 19, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 3, 3-6 hours: 17, 7-10 hours: 6, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 1

69% (27 of 39) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 236

PMATH351 Section 001 Nica Alexandru

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 31, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 3, Just right: 29, Somewhat too low: 6, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 19, Good: 21, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 24, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 23, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 10, Most of the time: 4, Often enough: 6, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 19

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 21, Interesting: 17, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 35, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 32, 75-90%: 7, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 23, Helpful: 16, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 30, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 2, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 27, No opinion: 3

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 23, Somewhat too little: 9, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 11, Okay: 26, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 22, 7-10 hours: 12, 11-15 hours: 4, > 15 hours: 1

82% (40 of 49) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 237

PMATH451/PMATH651 Section 001 Spronk Nicolaas

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 8, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 6, Just right: 7, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 9, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 10, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 9, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 8, Most of the time: 2, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 3

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 1, Interesting: 11, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 3

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 10, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 14, 75-90%: 0, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 0, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 12, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 8, No opinion: 2

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 6, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 2

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 6, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 1, 7-10 hours: 5, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 3

56% (15 of 27) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 238

PMATH453/PMATH753 Section 001 Davidson Kenneth R

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 8, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 3, Just right: 10, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 8, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 3

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 9, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 9, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 5, Most of the time: 3, Often enough: 1, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 5

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 12, Interesting: 2, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 11, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 12, 75-90%: 3, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 11, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 5, No opinion: 3

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 11, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 8, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 2, 7-10 hours: 5, 11-15 hours: 5, > 15 hours: 1

63% (15 of 24) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 239

PMATH465/PMATH665 Section 001 Park Doug

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 3, Good: 0, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 1, Just right: 3, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 1, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 4, Good: 0, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 2, Good: 1, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 2, Most of the time: 1, Often enough: 0, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 1

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 3, Interesting: 1, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 3, Good: 0, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 4, 75-90%: 0, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 0, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 4, No opinion: 0

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 0, No opinion: 2

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 3, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 4, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 2, 7-10 hours: 0, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 1

33% (4 of 12) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 240

SE 212 Section 001 Day, Nancy

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 17, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 9, Just right: 15, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 13, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 9, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 16, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 4, Most of the time: 5, Often enough: 3, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 13

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 9, Interesting: 14, Not Interesting: 2, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 18, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 21, 75-90%: 0, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 2, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 15, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 4, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 7, No text required: 0, No opinion: 12

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 15, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 19, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 13, 7-10 hours: 7, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 0

36% (25 of 70) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 241

SE 212 Section 002 Day, Nancy

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 16, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 9, Just right: 18, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 23, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 16, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 20, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 6, Most of the time: 7, Often enough: 1, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 12

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 12, Interesting: 11, Not Interesting: 4, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 21, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 21, 75-90%: 4, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 20, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 12, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 1, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 10, No text required: 3, No opinion: 7

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 17, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 24, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 19, 7-10 hours: 5, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 1

48% (27 of 56) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 242

STAT202 Section 001 Adcock James

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 20, Good: 48, Satisfactory: 23, Unsatisfactory: 11, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 14, Just right: 76, Somewhat too low: 9, Too low: 2, No opinion: 2

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 29, Good: 39, Satisfactory: 28, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 8, Good: 39, Satisfactory: 30, Unsatisfactory: 20, Very poor: 8, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 31, Good: 51, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 7, Most of the time: 7, Often enough: 11, Not often enough: 5, Never: 2, I did not seek help: 65

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 10, Interesting: 51, Not Interesting: 36, No opinion: 7

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 26, Good: 50, Satisfactory: 19, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 1

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 80, 75-90%: 18, 50-75%: 6, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 35, Helpful: 56, Not helpful: 10, No work assigned: 1, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 25, Helpful: 57, Not helpful: 12, No printed course notes: 4, No opinion: 5

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 26, Helpful: 43, Not helpful: 14, No text required: 3, No opinion: 15

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 6, Somewhat too much: 19, Okay: 73, Somewhat too little: 5, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 84, Somewhat too little: 7, Too little: 2, No opinion: 1

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 29, 3-6 hours: 60, 7-10 hours: 15, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0

40% (105 of 262) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 243

STAT202 Section 002 Goh Joslin Tze Ching

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 7, Good: 35, Satisfactory: 34, Unsatisfactory: 14, Very poor: 9, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 5, Somewhat too high: 17, Just right: 52, Somewhat too low: 16, Too low: 2, No opinion: 4

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 24, Good: 35, Satisfactory: 22, Unsatisfactory: 11, Very poor: 4, No opinion: 3

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 15, Good: 29, Satisfactory: 34, Unsatisfactory: 11, Very poor: 8, No opinion: 2

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 5, Good: 37, Satisfactory: 27, Unsatisfactory: 15, Very poor: 13, No opinion: 2

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 4, Most of the time: 19, Often enough: 11, Not often enough: 8, Never: 1, I did not seek help: 52

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 2, Interesting: 45, Not Interesting: 41, No opinion: 11

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 10, Good: 39, Satisfactory: 26, Unsatisfactory: 15, Very poor: 7, No opinion: 2

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 68, 75-90%: 16, 50-75%: 6, 25-50%: 3, < 25%: 6

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 23, Helpful: 58, Not helpful: 11, No work assigned: 3, No opinion: 4

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 12, Helpful: 45, Not helpful: 22, No printed course notes: 11, No opinion: 7

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 23, Helpful: 38, Not helpful: 15, No text required: 2, No opinion: 20

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 16, Okay: 71, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 2, No opinion: 3

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 9, Okay: 82, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 0, No opinion: 3

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 29, 3-6 hours: 60, 7-10 hours: 8, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 1

45% (99 of 222) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 244

STAT206 Section 001 Akhundov Ilham

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 22, Good: 38, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 1

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 9, Just right: 59, Somewhat too low: 5, Too low: 0, No opinion: 2

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 25, Good: 37, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 4

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 25, Good: 30, Satisfactory: 17, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 20, Good: 33, Satisfactory: 18, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 17, Most of the time: 9, Often enough: 12, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 37

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 20, Interesting: 41, Not Interesting: 9, No opinion: 6

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 29, Good: 34, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 47, 75-90%: 13, 50-75%: 8, 25-50%: 5, < 25%: 3

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 10, Helpful: 28, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 25, No opinion: 11

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 26, Helpful: 27, Not helpful: 4, No printed course notes: 12, No opinion: 5

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 15, Not helpful: 12, No text required: 12, No opinion: 29

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 59, Somewhat too little: 4, Too little: 0, No opinion: 2

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 47, Somewhat too little: 17, Too little: 4, No opinion: 7

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 47, 3-6 hours: 27, 7-10 hours: 0, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0

63% (76 of 121) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 245

STAT220 Section 001 Roberts Collin Donald

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 2, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 0, Just right: 4, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 3, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 3, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 2, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 3, Most of the time: 1, Often enough: 0, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 2

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 0, Interesting: 5, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 2, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 6, 75-90%: 0, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 0

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 3, No opinion: 2

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 6, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 6, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 2, 7-10 hours: 2, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

46% (6 of 13) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 246

STAT221/STAT231 Section 001 Banerjee Suryapratim

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 47, Good: 47, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 27, Just right: 76, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 42, Good: 41, Satisfactory: 18, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 2

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 44, Good: 40, Satisfactory: 18, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 51, Good: 39, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 23, Most of the time: 23, Often enough: 20, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 42

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 25, Interesting: 55, Not Interesting: 23, No opinion: 6

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 50, Good: 45, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 55, 75-90%: 32, 50-75%: 17, 25-50%: 2, < 25%: 2

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 43, Not helpful: 5, No work assigned: 45, No opinion: 4

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 21, Helpful: 42, Not helpful: 15, No printed course notes: 13, No opinion: 18

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 38, Not helpful: 10, No text required: 31, No opinion: 20

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 7, Somewhat too much: 30, Okay: 68, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 2

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 66, Somewhat too little: 8, Too little: 4, No opinion: 24

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 29, 3-6 hours: 58, 7-10 hours: 17, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 1

47% (109 of 230) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 247

STAT230 Section 001 Struthers Cyntha

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 82, Good: 42, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 9, Somewhat too high: 11, Just right: 109, Somewhat too low: 4, Too low: 2, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 59, Good: 51, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 4, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 92, Good: 30, Satisfactory: 13, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 84, Good: 42, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 28, Most of the time: 20, Often enough: 22, Not often enough: 5, Never: 1, I did not seek help: 59

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 39, Interesting: 78, Not Interesting: 15, No opinion: 4

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 72, Good: 48, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 99, 75-90%: 24, 50-75%: 11, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 30, Helpful: 40, Not helpful: 8, No work assigned: 49, No opinion: 5

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 53, Helpful: 46, Not helpful: 6, No printed course notes: 23, No opinion: 6

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 50, Helpful: 46, Not helpful: 8, No text required: 26, No opinion: 6

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 8, Somewhat too much: 25, Okay: 101, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 12, Okay: 88, Somewhat too little: 9, Too little: 9, No opinion: 15

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 44, 3-6 hours: 73, 7-10 hours: 15, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 2

64% (136 of 213) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 248

STAT230 Section 002 Skrzydlo Diana Katherine

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 23, Good: 27, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 13, Just right: 36, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 1, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 25, Good: 22, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 19, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 28, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 8, Most of the time: 6, Often enough: 6, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 36

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 12, Interesting: 29, Not Interesting: 12, No opinion: 3

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 25, Good: 26, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 44, 75-90%: 9, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 4, No work assigned: 32, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 15, Helpful: 28, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 9, No opinion: 3

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 14, Helpful: 13, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 22, No opinion: 6

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 17, Okay: 32, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 29, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 6, No opinion: 15

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 17, 3-6 hours: 28, 7-10 hours: 7, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 1

43% (56 of 131) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 249

STAT230 Section 003 Rice Gregory

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 52, Good: 26, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 11, Just right: 68, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 2, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 64, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 58, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 67, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 17, Most of the time: 11, Often enough: 5, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 49

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 21, Interesting: 56, Not Interesting: 6, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 60, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 64, 75-90%: 16, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 2, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 14, Helpful: 15, Not helpful: 3, No work assigned: 48, No opinion: 3

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 26, Helpful: 28, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 17, No opinion: 11

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 17, Helpful: 22, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 29, No opinion: 14

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 6, Somewhat too much: 16, Okay: 58, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 2

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 45, Somewhat too little: 5, Too little: 15, No opinion: 15

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 37, 3-6 hours: 35, 7-10 hours: 12, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

47% (84 of 180) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 250

STAT230 Section 004 Mohammad Nagham

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 26, Good: 45, Satisfactory: 20, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 1

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 13, Just right: 71, Somewhat too low: 10, Too low: 1, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 29, Good: 39, Satisfactory: 21, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 22, Good: 39, Satisfactory: 27, Unsatisfactory: 7, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 24, Good: 42, Satisfactory: 19, Unsatisfactory: 10, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 1

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 14, Most of the time: 13, Often enough: 9, Not often enough: 4, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 57

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 14, Interesting: 60, Not Interesting: 13, No opinion: 10

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 28, Good: 47, Satisfactory: 16, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 1

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 72, 75-90%: 19, 50-75%: 5, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 13, Helpful: 26, Not helpful: 3, No work assigned: 50, No opinion: 4

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 27, Helpful: 43, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 18, No opinion: 6

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 25, Helpful: 38, Not helpful: 6, No text required: 23, No opinion: 6

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 28, Okay: 58, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 2, No opinion: 2

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 9, Okay: 55, Somewhat too little: 9, Too little: 6, No opinion: 17

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 30, 3-6 hours: 47, 7-10 hours: 10, 11-15 hours: 7, > 15 hours: 1

54% (98 of 181) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 251

STAT230 Section 005 Mohammad Nagham

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 29, Good: 27, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 7, Just right: 48, Somewhat too low: 8, Too low: 2, No opinion: 4

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 25, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 8, Very poor: 4, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 36, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 25, Good: 27, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 1

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 24, Most of the time: 14, Often enough: 7, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 24

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 19, Interesting: 43, Not Interesting: 7, No opinion: 2

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 33, Good: 21, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 44, 75-90%: 14, 50-75%: 11, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 13, Helpful: 20, Not helpful: 5, No work assigned: 28, No opinion: 5

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 23, Helpful: 30, Not helpful: 4, No printed course notes: 11, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 18, Helpful: 27, Not helpful: 4, No text required: 14, No opinion: 8

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 14, Okay: 49, Somewhat too little: 4, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 45, Somewhat too little: 5, Too little: 8, No opinion: 6

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 22, 3-6 hours: 27, 7-10 hours: 16, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 2

41% (71 of 173) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 252

STAT231 Section 001 Banerjee Suryapratim

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 43, Good: 27, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 3, Somewhat too high: 15, Just right: 68, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 51, Good: 25, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 2

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 37, Good: 28, Satisfactory: 16, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 49, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 2

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 33, Most of the time: 4, Often enough: 16, Not often enough: 2, Never: 1, I did not seek help: 32

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 20, Interesting: 44, Not Interesting: 21, No opinion: 3

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 52, Good: 22, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 39, 75-90%: 23, 50-75%: 15, 25-50%: 4, < 25%: 6

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 31, Not helpful: 7, No work assigned: 38, No opinion: 4

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 18, Helpful: 37, Not helpful: 17, No printed course notes: 7, No opinion: 9

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 14, Helpful: 23, Not helpful: 11, No text required: 29, No opinion: 10

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 17, Okay: 64, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 48, Somewhat too little: 11, Too little: 6, No opinion: 17

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 30, 3-6 hours: 45, 7-10 hours: 11, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 0

42% (89 of 211) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 253

STAT240 Section 001 Diao Liqun

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 3, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 3, Somewhat too high: 3, Just right: 9, Somewhat too low: 5, Too low: 1, No opinion: 3

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 1, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 5, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 1, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 1

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 6, Most of the time: 2, Often enough: 3, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 13

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 2, Interesting: 11, Not Interesting: 9, No opinion: 2

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 1, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 4, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 18, 75-90%: 3, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 2

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 12, No work assigned: 3, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 7, No printed course notes: 4, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 5, No text required: 12, No opinion: 4

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 16, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 3, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 8, Somewhat too little: 6, Too little: 6, No opinion: 3

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 12, 3-6 hours: 11, 7-10 hours: 1, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

69% (24 of 35) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 254

STAT322 Section 001 Dawoud Dina

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 16, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 2, Just right: 17, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 15, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 17, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 17, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 10, Most of the time: 6, Often enough: 1, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 3

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 8, Interesting: 8, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 3

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 14, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 13, 75-90%: 4, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 4, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 13, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 1, No opinion: 0

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 10, No opinion: 0

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 16, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 15, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 3, 3-6 hours: 10, 7-10 hours: 6, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0

67% (20 of 30) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 255

STAT330 Section 001 Zhu Yeying

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 26, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 6, Somewhat too high: 15, Just right: 35, Somewhat too low: 6, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 22, Good: 25, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 25, Good: 25, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 15, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 22, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 19, Most of the time: 14, Often enough: 12, Not often enough: 2, Never: 1, I did not seek help: 16

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 5, Interesting: 33, Not Interesting: 24, No opinion: 2

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 21, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 50, 75-90%: 8, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 2, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 25, Helpful: 36, Not helpful: 3, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 13, Helpful: 21, Not helpful: 8, No printed course notes: 20, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 4, No text required: 32, No opinion: 8

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 8, Somewhat too much: 10, Okay: 43, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 57, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 4, 3-6 hours: 41, 7-10 hours: 14, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 1

46% (64 of 140) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 256

STAT330 Section 002 Zhu Yeying

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 15, Good: 21, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 1

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 4, Somewhat too high: 18, Just right: 26, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 2, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 15, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 16, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 7, Good: 22, Satisfactory: 16, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 18, Most of the time: 11, Often enough: 9, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 11

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 6, Interesting: 21, Not Interesting: 19, No opinion: 5

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 10, Good: 25, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 39, 75-90%: 12, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 37, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 2

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 21, Not helpful: 8, No printed course notes: 15, No opinion: 3

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 10, No text required: 20, No opinion: 7

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 7, Somewhat too much: 13, Okay: 30, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 40, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 4, 3-6 hours: 31, 7-10 hours: 10, 11-15 hours: 4, > 15 hours: 1

44% (51 of 116) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 257

STAT331 Section 001 Lysy Martin

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 6, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 20, Unsatisfactory: 12, Very poor: 7, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 15, Somewhat too high: 23, Just right: 14, Somewhat too low: 4, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 19, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 2

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 6, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 22, Unsatisfactory: 15, Very poor: 7, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 9, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 18, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 8, Most of the time: 7, Often enough: 14, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 28

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 9, Interesting: 23, Not Interesting: 21, No opinion: 4

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 7, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 19, Unsatisfactory: 10, Very poor: 4, No opinion: 1

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 39, 75-90%: 11, 50-75%: 4, 25-50%: 2, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 16, Helpful: 28, Not helpful: 12, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 16, Helpful: 20, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 18, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 7, No text required: 30, No opinion: 11

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 14, Somewhat too much: 14, Okay: 28, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 7, Somewhat too much: 11, Okay: 36, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 5, 3-6 hours: 29, 7-10 hours: 14, 11-15 hours: 8, > 15 hours: 1

51% (57 of 111) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 258

STAT331 Section 002 Lysy Martin

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 9, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 5, Somewhat too high: 18, Just right: 13, Somewhat too low: 4, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 19, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 9, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 13, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 16, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 6, Most of the time: 12, Often enough: 7, Not often enough: 3, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 12

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 8, Interesting: 20, Not Interesting: 9, No opinion: 3

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 10, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 31, 75-90%: 7, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 12, Helpful: 25, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 17, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 3, No printed course notes: 10, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 20, No opinion: 12

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 11, Okay: 24, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 10, Okay: 28, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 4, 3-6 hours: 23, 7-10 hours: 10, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 2

65% (40 of 62) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 259

STAT332 Section 001 Browne Ryan Patrick

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 17, Good: 42, Satisfactory: 13, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 2

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 3, Somewhat too high: 15, Just right: 56, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 2, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 27, Good: 35, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 2

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 22, Good: 35, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 18, Good: 45, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 19, Most of the time: 17, Often enough: 16, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 26

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 10, Interesting: 52, Not Interesting: 15, No opinion: 2

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 18, Good: 43, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 37, 75-90%: 24, 50-75%: 9, 25-50%: 5, < 25%: 4

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 25, Helpful: 50, Not helpful: 4, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 18, Helpful: 33, Not helpful: 8, No printed course notes: 11, No opinion: 9

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 15, Not helpful: 7, No text required: 43, No opinion: 10

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 67, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 1, No opinion: 2

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 70, Somewhat too little: 4, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 11, 3-6 hours: 50, 7-10 hours: 17, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

43% (80 of 188) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 260

STAT333 Section 001 Zhang Chong

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 24, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 16, Just right: 28, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 24, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 25, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 19, Good: 21, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 10, Most of the time: 10, Often enough: 11, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 15

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 16, Interesting: 27, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 3

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 19, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 38, 75-90%: 5, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 18, Helpful: 24, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 10, Helpful: 20, Not helpful: 6, No printed course notes: 6, No opinion: 4

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 18, No opinion: 9

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 36, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 36, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 20, 7-10 hours: 18, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 2

43% (46 of 107) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 261

STAT333 Section 002 Zhang Chong

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 22, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 13, Just right: 23, Somewhat too low: 6, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 19, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 2

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 22, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 14, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 11, Most of the time: 7, Often enough: 10, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 17

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 15, Interesting: 18, Not Interesting: 9, No opinion: 3

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 20, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 37, 75-90%: 7, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 15, Helpful: 24, Not helpful: 6, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 6, No printed course notes: 13, No opinion: 6

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 31, No opinion: 7

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 9, Okay: 28, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 36, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 28, 7-10 hours: 9, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 2

41% (45 of 110) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 262

STAT334 Section 001 Skrzydlo Diana Katherine

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 26, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 4, Just right: 27, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 26, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 21, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 27, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 19, Most of the time: 7, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 1

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 13, Interesting: 18, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 2

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 22, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 30, 75-90%: 2, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 20, Helpful: 13, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 6, No printed course notes: 7, No opinion: 7

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 3, No text required: 16, No opinion: 9

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 9, Okay: 19, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 23, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 4, 3-6 hours: 19, 7-10 hours: 8, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 0

79% (33 of 42) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 263

STAT337 Section 001 Cotton Cecilia Anne

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 28, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 2, Just right: 31, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 24, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 24, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 26, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 15, Most of the time: 5, Often enough: 6, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 8

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 18, Interesting: 13, Not Interesting: 4, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 27, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 29, 75-90%: 6, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 13, Helpful: 22, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 17, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 3, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 24, No opinion: 0

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 28, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 27, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 7, 3-6 hours: 19, 7-10 hours: 8, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 1

41% (36 of 88) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 264

STAT341 Section 001 Ghodsi Boushehri Ali

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 12, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 6, Just right: 15, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 15, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 9, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 9, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 2, Most of the time: 4, Often enough: 6, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 12

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 14, Interesting: 10, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 11, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 20, 75-90%: 5, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 15, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 15, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 0, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 22, No opinion: 4

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 16, Somewhat too little: 5, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 19, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 17, 7-10 hours: 5, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 2

59% (26 of 44) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 265

STAT371 Section 001 Fahmy Hany

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 12, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 6, Just right: 24, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 7, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 9, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 12, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 3, Most of the time: 3, Often enough: 6, Not often enough: 3, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 17

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 5, Interesting: 20, Not Interesting: 7, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 8, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 26, 75-90%: 5, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 12, Helpful: 20, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 16, No opinion: 0

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 19, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 8, No opinion: 0

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 21, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 26, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 17, 7-10 hours: 13, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0

34% (32 of 93) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 266

STAT372 Section 001 Balka Peter

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 7, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 3, Just right: 26, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 10, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 12, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 13, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 4, Most of the time: 6, Often enough: 9, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 10

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 2, Interesting: 25, Not Interesting: 2, No opinion: 2

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 11, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 27, 75-90%: 3, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 17, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 15, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 3, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 19, No opinion: 1

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 29, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 30, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 5, 3-6 hours: 19, 7-10 hours: 6, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

36% (31 of 85) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 267

STAT373 Section 001 Fahmy Hany

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 4, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 7, Just right: 4, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 3, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 4, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 4, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 0, Most of the time: 1, Often enough: 6, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 8

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 2, Interesting: 10, Not Interesting: 5, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 3, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 16, 75-90%: 1, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 9, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 2, No opinion: 0

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 7, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 11, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 7, 7-10 hours: 7, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 1

38% (18 of 47) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 268

STAT430/STAT830 Section 001 Camacho Fernando

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 1, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 4, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 6, Just right: 8, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 3, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 6, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 2, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 6, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 2, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 6, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 4, Most of the time: 3, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 7, Never: 1, I did not seek help: 6

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 3, Interesting: 5, Not Interesting: 11, No opinion: 4

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 2, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 5, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 16, 75-90%: 5, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 5, No work assigned: 3, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 0, Not helpful: 3, No printed course notes: 19, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 6, No text required: 0, No opinion: 0

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 6, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 9, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 10, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 2, No opinion: 2

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 3, 3-6 hours: 11, 7-10 hours: 7, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 2

43% (23 of 53) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 269

STAT431/STAT831 Section 001 Oldford Wayne

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 10, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 13, Just right: 16, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 15, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 9, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 11, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 7, Most of the time: 10, Often enough: 5, Not often enough: 5, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 5

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 9, Interesting: 16, Not Interesting: 6, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 11, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 25, 75-90%: 6, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 14, Helpful: 17, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 16, Not helpful: 10, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 6, No text required: 18, No opinion: 4

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 21, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 21, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 17, 7-10 hours: 11, 11-15 hours: 4, > 15 hours: 0

76% (32 of 42) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 270

STAT433/STAT833 Section 001 Shen Yi

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 26, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 5, Somewhat too high: 19, Just right: 23, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 24, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 4

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 30, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 26, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 22, Most of the time: 10, Often enough: 6, Not often enough: 4, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 8

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 21, Interesting: 23, Not Interesting: 4, No opinion: 2

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 30, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 38, 75-90%: 9, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 28, Helpful: 15, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 4, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 34, No opinion: 3

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 5, No text required: 21, No opinion: 7

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 14, Okay: 29, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 9, Okay: 31, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 6, 3-6 hours: 22, 7-10 hours: 15, 11-15 hours: 5, > 15 hours: 1

47% (50 of 106) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 271

STAT441/STAT841/CM763 Section 001 Ghodsi Boushehri Ali

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 10, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 6, Somewhat too high: 16, Just right: 18, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 18, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 15, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 17, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 11, Most of the time: 5, Often enough: 7, Not often enough: 7, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 11

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 15, Interesting: 25, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 11, Good: 21, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 33, 75-90%: 7, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 24, Helpful: 17, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 12, Helpful: 20, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 8, No opinion: 0

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 17, No opinion: 3

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 7, Somewhat too much: 14, Okay: 20, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 10, Somewhat too much: 16, Okay: 15, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 7, 7-10 hours: 12, 11-15 hours: 14, > 15 hours: 8

69% (41 of 59) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 272

STAT442/STAT842/CM762 Section 001 Oldford Wayne

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 8, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 5, Just right: 11, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 5, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 5, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 6, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 4, Most of the time: 3, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 7

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 9, Interesting: 11, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 7, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 13, 75-90%: 5, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 6, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 0, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 14, No opinion: 4

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 13, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 15, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 7, 7-10 hours: 11, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 0

44% (20 of 45) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 273

STAT443 Section 001 Marriott Paul Kenneth

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 16, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 16, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 4, Somewhat too high: 22, Just right: 27, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 26, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 3

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 15, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 18, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 23, Most of the time: 9, Often enough: 10, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 10

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 11, Interesting: 34, Not Interesting: 7, No opinion: 2

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 21, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 39, 75-90%: 11, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 25, Helpful: 19, Not helpful: 4, No work assigned: 5, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 25, Helpful: 20, Not helpful: 4, No printed course notes: 4, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 4, No text required: 36, No opinion: 3

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 8, Somewhat too much: 15, Okay: 25, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 2, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 11, Okay: 31, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 2, No opinion: 5

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 6, 3-6 hours: 24, 7-10 hours: 18, 11-15 hours: 5, > 15 hours: 1

56% (55 of 99) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 274

STAT890 Section 001 Camacho Fernando

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 1, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 4, Just right: 0, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 1, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 2, Good: 1, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 1, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 1, Most of the time: 0, Often enough: 1, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 1

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 2, Interesting: 2, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 2, Good: 1, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 3, 75-90%: 1, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 2, No opinion: 0

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 0, No opinion: 0

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 2, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 2, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 1, 7-10 hours: 2, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 1

80% (4 of 5) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 275

STAT901 Section 001 Small Christopher G

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 18, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 6, Just right: 18, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 14, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 20, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 18, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 5, Most of the time: 8, Often enough: 8, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 1

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 9, Interesting: 11, Not Interesting: 4, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 17, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 23, 75-90%: 2, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 15, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 6, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 15, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 0, No opinion: 1

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 19, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 20, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 5, 3-6 hours: 8, 7-10 hours: 8, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 2

76% (25 of 33) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 276

STAT906 Section 001 Lemieux Christiane

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 7, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 1, Just right: 9, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 6, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 6, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 8, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 5, Most of the time: 3, Often enough: 1, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 2

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 9, Interesting: 2, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 9, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 6, 75-90%: 2, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 2, No opinion: 0

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 4, No opinion: 1

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 10, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 11, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 5, 7-10 hours: 4, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

48% (11 of 23) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 277

STAT946 Section 002 Ghodsi Boushehre Ali

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 7, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructor’s explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 5, Just right: 6, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructor’s treatment of students’ questions:Excellent: 9, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 6, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor’s oral presentation:Excellent: 7, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 2, Most of the time: 3, Often enough: 5, Not often enough: 0, Never: 1, I did not seek help: 3

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 8, Interesting: 6, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 6, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) Whatproportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 11, 75-90%: 3, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 2

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 8, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 10, No opinion: 1

13) Didthe course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 7, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 9, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) Onav erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 6, 7-10 hours: 1, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 3

64% (14 of 22) of students answered some questions.

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 278

Index by Course

Page Instructor Course1 Blake William Peter Thomas ACTSC221 Section 0012 Freeland R Keith ACTSC231 Section 0013 Mei Yuchen ACTSC231 Section 0024 Adcock James ACTSC232 Section 0015 Cai Jun ACTSC331 Section 0016 Tan Ken S ACTSC371 Section 0017 Matheson Brenton James ACTSC371 Section 0028 Wood Peter J ACTSC372 Section 0019 Weng Chengguo ACTSC431/ACTSC831 Section 001

10 CaiJun ACTSC432/ACTSC832 Section 00111 SaundersDavid ACTSC445/ACTSC845 Section 00112 LemieuxChristiane ACTSC446/ACTSC846 Section 00113 Van Kooten Christopher John ACTSC463 Section 00114 Brisley Neil ACTSC471 Section 00115 Li Siu Hang ACTSC611 Section 00116 Tan Ken S ACTSC612 Section 00117 ZhuMu ACTSC613 Section 00118 Andrews Douglas William ACTSC614 Section 00119 Andrews Douglas William ACTSC615 Section 00120 Li Bin ACTSC970/ACC770 Section 00121 Kolkiewicz Adam ACTSC972/ACC772 Section 00122 Wirjanto Tony ACTSC974/STAT974 Section 00123 VrscayEdward R AMATH231 Section 00124 West Joseph John AMATH250 Section 00125 West Joseph John AMATH250 Section 00226 LambKevin G AMATH251 Section 00127 Waite Michael L. AMATH271 Section 00128 AndreRobert AMATH331/PMATH331 Section 00129 Harmsworth David L AMATH350 Section 00130 PoulinFrancis AMATH351 Section 00131 Rhebergen Sander AMATH442 Section 00132 Sivaloganathan Sivabal AMATH453 Section 00133 Siegel David AMATH456 Section 00134 StastnaMarek M AMATH463/AMATH663 Section 00135 RohPatrick Young CO227Section 00136 GueninBertrand CO250Section 00137 Vavasis Stephen CO250 Section 00238 KatzEric CO330Section 00139 RichterR. Bruce CO342 Section 00140 RichterR. Bruce CO351 Section 00141 Fukasawa Ricardo CO370Section 00142 XuWei CO372 Section 00143 Wagner David G CO430/CO630 Section 00144 PostleLuke CO442/CO642 Section 00145 Fukasawa Ricardo CO450/CO650Section 00146 Gauthier-Shalom Gabriel CO456 Section 00147 Wolkowicz Henry CO463/CO663 Section 00148 JaoDavid CO485/CO685Section 00149 Radocchia,Joseph Anthony COMM231 Section 00150 Matheson,Brenton James COMM421 Section 00151 Liu,Zhiyong Michael COMM431 Section 00152 DupontEdward CS115Section 00153 IbrahimAhmed Fakhri CS115Section 00254 GrahamSandra Lynn CS115Section 003

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 279

55 IbrahimAhmed Fakhri CS115Section 00456 Bedawi Safaa Mahmoud Ahmed CS115 Section 00557 GrahamSandra Lynn CS115Section 00658 SakhniniVictoria CS115Section 00759 Bedawi Safaa Mahmoud Ahmed CS115 Section 00860 MaftuleacDaniela CS115Section 00961 Vogel Daniel CS115 Section 01062 CaseLori CS116Section 00163 CaseLori CS116Section 00264 CaseLori CS116Section 00365 Tompkins Dave CS135 Section 00166 HoltbyDaniel James CS135 Section 00267 Akinyemi John Akinlabi CS135 Section 00368 Roegiest Adam Micheal CS135 Section 00469 Tompkins Dave CS135 Section 00570 IsteadLesley Ann CS135Section 00671 IsteadLesley Ann CS135Section 00772 HoltbyDaniel James CS135 Section 00873 Akinyemi John Akinlabi CS135 Section 00974 Roegiest Adam Micheal CS135 Section 01075 HeinleAlbert CS135Section 01176 CormackGordon V CS136 Section 00177 CormackGordon V CS136 Section 00278 BrightCurtis William CS136Section 00379 MortonAndrew CS137 Section 00180 LushmanBradley Michael CS145Section 00181 DalyBarbara CS200Section 00182 Al-MasriEyhab CS230Section 00183 HosseiniHadi CS234Section 00184 MehrabiSaeed CS234Section 00285 StorjohannArne CS240Section 00186 StorjohannArne CS240Section 00287 Vasiga Troy Michael John CS241 Section 00188 Vasiga Troy Michael John CS241 Section 00289 LushmanBradley Michael CS241Section 00390 LanctotKevin CS241Section 00491 LhotakOndrej CS241Section 00592 Van Beek Peter CS245 Section 00193 BussJonathan CS245Section 00294 BussJonathan CS245Section 00395 Van Beek Peter CS245 Section 00496 Van Beek Peter CS245 Section 00597 Ben-David Shai CS245 Section 00698 NaeemNomair Ahmed CS246 Section 00199 ZhangCheng CS246Section 002

100 NaeemNomair Ahmed CS246 Section 003101 ZhangCheng CS246Section 004102 NaeemNomair Ahmed CS246 Section 005103 KharalRosina CS251Section 001104 KharalRosina CS251Section 002105 LiuZhiyong Michael CS330 Section 001106 LiuZhiyong Michael CS330 Section 002107 XuWei CS335 Section 001108 Toman David CS338Section 001109 StinsonDouglas R CS341 Section 001110 StinsonDouglas R CS341 Section 002

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 280

111 LanctotKevin CS341Section 003112 BuhrPeter A CS343 Section 001113 HarjiAshif S CS343 Section 002114 BuhrPeter A CS343 Section 003115 ChanEdward CS348Section 001116 ChanEdward CS348Section 002117 ChanEdward CS348Section 003118 Becker Byron Weber CS349Section 001119 Becker Byron Weber CS349Section 002120 SalemKenneth CS350Section 001121 Wong Bernard CS350 Section 002122 Wong Bernard CS350 Section 003123 RobertsCollin Donald CS360 Section 001124 LabahnGeorge CS370Section 001125 LabahnGeorge CS370Section 002126 Kou Tian CS430Section 001127 Safayeni Suzanne CS432 Section 001128 LimamNoura CS436/CS636Section 001129 BerryDaniel CS445/CS645/ECE451Section 001130 BoutabaRaouf CS456/CS656Section 001131 BoutabaRaouf CS456/CS656Section 002132 Wang Tao CS458/CS658Section 001133 Goldberg Ian CS458/CS658Section 002134 MaBin CS466/CS666Section 001135 Ben-David Shai CS485/CS685 Section 001136 Hoey Jesse CS486/CS686Section 001137 Hoey Jesse CS486/CS686Section 002138 KaplanCraig Steven CS488/CS688 Section 001139 DiMarcoChrysanne CS697Section 001140 Trefler Richard CS745/ECE725 Section 001141 Watrous John CS766/QIC820 Section 001142 Cleve Richard Erwin CS768/AMATH871/CO/681/PHYS767/QIC710 Section 001143 OrchardJeffery John CS770/CM670/AMATH740 Section 001144 Freeland,R Keith MATBUS470 Section 001145 Wood, Peter J MATBUS471 Section 001146 HendersonRobert Douglas Evert MATH103 Section 001147 SohailNasir N MATH104 Section 001148 GindiSteven MATH106 Section 001149 Ashburner Michelle Roshan Marie MATH109 Section 001150 Ashburner Michelle Roshan Marie MATH109 Section 002151 Ashburner Michelle Roshan Marie MATH109 Section 003152 ZhuYi M ATH114 Section 001153 ZhuYi M ATH114 Section 002154 HamiltonJordan MATH124 Section 001155 McGrathPaul MATH127 Section 001156 DunbarFiona Emer Siobhan MATH127 Section 002157 Ingalls Brian MATH127 Section 003158 Keplinger Keegan MATH127 Section 004159 SmithPaula T. MATH127 Section 005160 Kuo Wentang MATH127 Section 006161 KloostermanMatthew MATH127 Section 007162 Waite Michael L. MATH127 Section 008163 Yawney John MATH127 Section 009164 XiaoStanley Yao MATH128 Section 001165 KnollCarolyn Alexis MATH135 Section 001166 KnollCarolyn Alexis MATH135 Section 002

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 281

167 PrettiJohn-Paul C MATH135 Section 003168 PrettiJohn-Paul C MATH135 Section 004169 AkashMukto MATH135 Section 005170 AkashMukto MATH135 Section 006171 Trelford Ryan MATH135 Section 007172 Trelford Ryan MATH135 Section 008173 BaumanShane B MATH135 Section 009174 NelsonJennifer Anne MATH135 Section 010175 NelsonJennifer Anne MATH135 Section 011176 Freiberg Tristan MATH135 Section 012177 Hewitt Conrad G MATH135 Section 013178 NelsonJennifer Anne MATH135 Section 014179 BruniCarmen Anthony MATH135 Section 015180 BruniCarmen Anthony MATH135 Section 016181 MarcottCameron MATH135 Section 017182 Koeller Judith Ann MATH135 Section 018183 Koeller Judith Ann MATH135 Section 019184 BaumanShane B MATH135 Section 020185 BaumanShane B MATH135 Section 021186 GarbaryRobert MATH135 Section 022187 VanderBurgh Ian W T MATH135 Section 023188 LiuYu-Ru MATH135 Section 024189 GarbaryRobert MATH135 Section 025190 ThompsonAlan Matthew MATH135 Section 026191 Vicente Colmenares Alejandra MATH136 Section 001192 Wood Peter J MATH136 Section 002193 McGrathPaul MATH136 Section 003194 D’AlessioSerge MATH137 Section 001195 Ferguson Barry MATH137 Section 002196 Forouzannia Farinaz MATH137 Section 003197 Hewitt Conrad G MATH137 Section 004198 EdenMichael Charles MATH137 Section 005199 Sivaloganathan Sivabal MATH137 Section 006200 GamacheAlain MATH137 Section 007201 Park Doug MATH137 Section 008202 DupuisMaite MATH137 Section 009203 PoulinFrancis MATH137 Section 010204 HamiltonJordan MATH138 Section 001205 Fagerstrom Emily MATH138 Section 002206 Vinette Francine MATH138 Section 003207 New Stephen MATH145 Section 001208 McKinnonDavid MATH147 Section 001209 SmithPaula T. MATH207 Section 001210 HartzMichael Peter MATH225 Section 001211 MarshmanBeverly J MATH227 Section 001212 BeltaosAndrew MATH228 Section 001213 PeiMartin MATH229 Section 001214 Wolczuk Dan Sean Terry MATH235 Section 001215 Szpojankowski Kamil MATH235 Section 002216 StephensonJonathan MATH235 Section 003217 SatrianoMatthew MATH235 Section 004218 Wolczuk Dan Sean Terry MATH235 Section 005219 West Joseph John MATH237 Section 001220 Wolczuk Dan Sean Terry MATH237 Section 002221 RohPatrick Young MATH237 Section 003222 Krivodonova Lilia MATH237 Section 004

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 282

223 Alburquerque Fernando MATH237 Section 005224 LeungDebbie MATH239 Section 001225 Haxell Penny E. MATH239 Section 002226 PeiMartin MATH239 Section 003227 Haxell Penny E. MATH239 Section 004228 PurbhooKevin MATH245 Section 001229 Siegel David MATH247 Section 001230 PurbhooKevin MATH249 Section 001231 Kohler, David MTHEL131Section 001232 Payne Ian PMATH330 Section 001233 Ghaswala Tyrone PMATH336 Section 001234 Kuo Wentang PMATH340 Section 001235 MoosaRahim PMATH347 Section 001236 NicaAlexandru PMATH351 Section 001237 SpronkNicolaas PMATH451/PMATH651 Section 001238 Davidson Kenneth R PMATH453/PMATH753 Section 001239 Park Doug PMATH465/PMATH665 Section 001240 Day, Nancy SE 212 Section 001241 Day, Nancy SE 212 Section 002242 AdcockJames STAT202 Section 001243 GohJoslin Tze Ching STAT202 Section 002244 Akhundov Ilham STAT206 Section 001245 RobertsCollin Donald STAT220 Section 001246 BanerjeeSuryapratim STAT221/STAT231 Section 001247 StruthersCyntha STAT230 Section 001248 SkrzydloDiana Katherine STAT230 Section 002249 RiceGregory STAT230 Section 003250 MohammadNagham STAT230 Section 004251 MohammadNagham STAT230 Section 005252 BanerjeeSuryapratim STAT231 Section 001253 DiaoLiqun STAT240 Section 001254 Dawoud Dina STAT322 Section 001255 ZhuYe ying STAT330 Section 001256 ZhuYe ying STAT330 Section 002257 Lysy Martin STAT331 Section 001258 Lysy Martin STAT331 Section 002259 Browne Ryan Patrick STAT332 Section 001260 ZhangChong STAT333 Section 001261 ZhangChong STAT333 Section 002262 SkrzydloDiana Katherine STAT334 Section 001263 CottonCecilia Anne STAT337 Section 001264 GhodsiBoushehri Ali STAT341 Section 001265 Fahmy Hany STAT371 Section 001266 BalkaPeter STAT372 Section 001267 Fahmy Hany STAT373 Section 001268 CamachoFernando STAT430/STAT830 Section 001269 OldfordWayne STAT431/STAT831 Section 001270 ShenYi STAT433/STAT833 Section 001271 GhodsiBoushehri Ali STAT441/STAT841/CM763 Section 001272 OldfordWayne STAT442/STAT842/CM762 Section 001273 MarriottPaul Kenneth STAT443 Section 001274 CamachoFernando STAT890 Section 001275 SmallChristopher G STAT901 Section 001276 LemieuxChristiane STAT906 Section 001277 GhodsiBoushehre Ali STAT946 Section 002

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 283

Index by Instructor

Page Instructor Course4 Adcock James ACTSC232 Section 001

242 AdcockJames STAT202 Section 001170 AkashMukto MATH135 Section 006169 AkashMukto MATH135 Section 005244 Akhundov Ilham STAT206 Section 00173 Akinyemi John Akinlabi CS135 Section 00967 Akinyemi John Akinlabi CS135 Section 00382 Al-MasriEyhab CS230Section 001

223 Alburquerque Fernando MATH237 Section 00528 AndreRobert AMATH331/PMATH331 Section 00118 Andrews Douglas William ACTSC614 Section 00119 Andrews Douglas William ACTSC615 Section 001

149 Ashburner Michelle Roshan Marie MATH109 Section 001150 Ashburner Michelle Roshan Marie MATH109 Section 002151 Ashburner Michelle Roshan Marie MATH109 Section 003266 BalkaPeter STAT372 Section 001252 BanerjeeSuryapratim STAT231 Section 001246 BanerjeeSuryapratim STAT221/STAT231 Section 001173 BaumanShane B MATH135 Section 009184 BaumanShane B MATH135 Section 020185 BaumanShane B MATH135 Section 021119 Becker Byron Weber CS349Section 002118 Becker Byron Weber CS349Section 00159 Bedawi Safaa Mahmoud Ahmed CS115 Section 00856 Bedawi Safaa Mahmoud Ahmed CS115 Section 005

212 BeltaosAndrew MATH228 Section 00197 Ben-David Shai CS245 Section 006

135 Ben-David Shai CS485/CS685 Section 001129 BerryDaniel CS445/CS645/ECE451Section 001

1 Blake William Peter Thomas ACTSC221 Section 001130 BoutabaRaouf CS456/CS656Section 001131 BoutabaRaouf CS456/CS656Section 00278 BrightCurtis William CS136Section 00314 Brisley Neil ACTSC471 Section 001

259 Browne Ryan Patrick STAT332 Section 001180 BruniCarmen Anthony MATH135 Section 016179 BruniCarmen Anthony MATH135 Section 015114 BuhrPeter A CS343 Section 003112 BuhrPeter A CS343 Section 00193 BussJonathan CS245Section 00294 BussJonathan CS245Section 00310 CaiJun ACTSC432/ACTSC832 Section 0015 Cai Jun ACTSC331 Section 001

268 CamachoFernando STAT430/STAT830 Section 001274 CamachoFernando STAT890 Section 00162 CaseLori CS116Section 00164 CaseLori CS116Section 00363 CaseLori CS116Section 002

115 ChanEdward CS348Section 001116 ChanEdward CS348Section 002117 ChanEdward CS348Section 003142 Cleve Richard Erwin CS768/AMATH871/CO/681/PHYS767/QIC710 Section 00177 CormackGordon V CS136 Section 00276 CormackGordon V CS136 Section 001

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 284

263 CottonCecilia Anne STAT337 Section 001194 D’AlessioSerge MATH137 Section 00181 DalyBarbara CS200Section 001

238 Davidson Kenneth R PMATH453/PMATH753 Section 001254 Dawoud Dina STAT322 Section 001241 Day, Nancy SE 212 Section 002240 Day, Nancy SE 212 Section 001139 DiMarcoChrysanne CS697Section 001253 DiaoLiqun STAT240 Section 001156 DunbarFiona Emer Siobhan MATH127 Section 00252 DupontEdward CS115Section 001

202 DupuisMaite MATH137 Section 009198 EdenMichael Charles MATH137 Section 005205 Fagerstrom Emily MATH138 Section 002267 Fahmy Hany STAT373 Section 001265 Fahmy Hany STAT371 Section 001195 Ferguson Barry MATH137 Section 002196 Forouzannia Farinaz MATH137 Section 003

2 Freeland R Keith ACTSC231 Section 001144 Freeland,R Keith MATBUS470 Section 001176 Freiberg Tristan MATH135 Section 01245 Fukasawa Ricardo CO450/CO650Section 00141 Fukasawa Ricardo CO370Section 001

200 GamacheAlain MATH137 Section 007189 GarbaryRobert MATH135 Section 025186 GarbaryRobert MATH135 Section 02246 Gauthier-Shalom Gabriel CO456 Section 001

233 Ghaswala Tyrone PMATH336 Section 001277 GhodsiBoushehre Ali STAT946 Section 002271 GhodsiBoushehri Ali STAT441/STAT841/CM763 Section 001264 GhodsiBoushehri Ali STAT341 Section 001148 GindiSteven MATH106 Section 001243 GohJoslin Tze Ching STAT202 Section 002133 Goldberg Ian CS458/CS658Section 00254 GrahamSandra Lynn CS115Section 00357 GrahamSandra Lynn CS115Section 00636 GueninBertrand CO250Section 001

154 HamiltonJordan MATH124 Section 001204 HamiltonJordan MATH138 Section 001113 HarjiAshif S CS343 Section 00229 Harmsworth David L AMATH350 Section 001

210 HartzMichael Peter MATH225 Section 001227 Haxell Penny E. MATH239 Section 004225 Haxell Penny E. MATH239 Section 00275 HeinleAlbert CS135Section 011

146 HendersonRobert Douglas Evert MATH103 Section 001197 Hewitt Conrad G MATH137 Section 004177 Hewitt Conrad G MATH135 Section 013136 Hoey Jesse CS486/CS686Section 001137 Hoey Jesse CS486/CS686Section 00272 HoltbyDaniel James CS135 Section 00866 HoltbyDaniel James CS135 Section 00283 HosseiniHadi CS234Section 00153 IbrahimAhmed Fakhri CS115Section 00255 IbrahimAhmed Fakhri CS115Section 004

157 Ingalls Brian MATH127 Section 003

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 285

70 IsteadLesley Ann CS135Section 00671 IsteadLesley Ann CS135Section 00748 JaoDavid CO485/CO685Section 001

138 KaplanCraig Steven CS488/CS688 Section 00138 KatzEric CO330Section 001

158 Keplinger Keegan MATH127 Section 004104 KharalRosina CS251Section 002103 KharalRosina CS251Section 001161 KloostermanMatthew MATH127 Section 007165 KnollCarolyn Alexis MATH135 Section 001166 KnollCarolyn Alexis MATH135 Section 002182 Koeller Judith Ann MATH135 Section 018183 Koeller Judith Ann MATH135 Section 019231 Kohler, David MTHEL131Section 00121 Kolkiewicz Adam ACTSC972/ACC772 Section 001

126 Kou Tian CS430Section 001222 Krivodonova Lilia MATH237 Section 004160 Kuo Wentang MATH127 Section 006234 Kuo Wentang PMATH340 Section 001124 LabahnGeorge CS370Section 001125 LabahnGeorge CS370Section 00226 LambKevin G AMATH251 Section 00190 LanctotKevin CS241Section 004

111 LanctotKevin CS341Section 003276 LemieuxChristiane STAT906 Section 00112 LemieuxChristiane ACTSC446/ACTSC846 Section 001

224 LeungDebbie MATH239 Section 00191 LhotakOndrej CS241Section 00520 Li Bin ACTSC970/ACC770 Section 00115 Li Siu Hang ACTSC611 Section 001

128 LimamNoura CS436/CS636Section 001188 LiuYu-Ru MATH135 Section 024106 LiuZhiyong Michael CS330 Section 002105 LiuZhiyong Michael CS330 Section 00151 Liu,Zhiyong Michael COMM431 Section 00189 LushmanBradley Michael CS241Section 00380 LushmanBradley Michael CS145Section 001

257 Lysy Martin STAT331 Section 001258 Lysy Martin STAT331 Section 002134 MaBin CS466/CS666Section 00160 MaftuleacDaniela CS115Section 009

181 MarcottCameron MATH135 Section 017273 MarriottPaul Kenneth STAT443 Section 001211 MarshmanBeverly J MATH227 Section 001

7 Matheson Brenton James ACTSC371 Section 00250 Matheson,Brenton James COMM421 Section 001

155 McGrathPaul MATH127 Section 001193 McGrathPaul MATH136 Section 003208 McKinnonDavid MATH147 Section 00184 MehrabiSaeed CS234Section 0023 Mei Yuchen ACTSC231 Section 002

250 MohammadNagham STAT230 Section 004251 MohammadNagham STAT230 Section 005235 MoosaRahim PMATH347 Section 00179 MortonAndrew CS137 Section 00198 NaeemNomair Ahmed CS246 Section 001

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 286

100 NaeemNomair Ahmed CS246 Section 003102 NaeemNomair Ahmed CS246 Section 005174 NelsonJennifer Anne MATH135 Section 010175 NelsonJennifer Anne MATH135 Section 011178 NelsonJennifer Anne MATH135 Section 014207 New Stephen MATH145 Section 001236 NicaAlexandru PMATH351 Section 001272 OldfordWayne STAT442/STAT842/CM762 Section 001269 OldfordWayne STAT431/STAT831 Section 001143 OrchardJeffery John CS770/CM670/AMATH740 Section 001239 Park Doug PMATH465/PMATH665 Section 001201 Park Doug MATH137 Section 008232 Payne Ian PMATH330 Section 001213 PeiMartin MATH229 Section 001226 PeiMartin MATH239 Section 00344 PostleLuke CO442/CO642 Section 001

203 PoulinFrancis MATH137 Section 01030 PoulinFrancis AMATH351 Section 001

167 PrettiJohn-Paul C MATH135 Section 003168 PrettiJohn-Paul C MATH135 Section 004230 PurbhooKevin MATH249 Section 001228 PurbhooKevin MATH245 Section 00149 Radocchia,Joseph Anthony COMM231 Section 00131 Rhebergen Sander AMATH442 Section 001

249 RiceGregory STAT230 Section 00340 RichterR. Bruce CO351 Section 00139 RichterR. Bruce CO342 Section 001

245 RobertsCollin Donald STAT220 Section 001123 RobertsCollin Donald CS360 Section 00174 Roegiest Adam Micheal CS135 Section 01068 Roegiest Adam Micheal CS135 Section 00435 RohPatrick Young CO227Section 001

221 RohPatrick Young MATH237 Section 003127 Safayeni Suzanne CS432 Section 00158 SakhniniVictoria CS115Section 007

120 SalemKenneth CS350Section 001217 SatrianoMatthew MATH235 Section 00411 SaundersDavid ACTSC445/ACTSC845 Section 001

270 ShenYi STAT433/STAT833 Section 00133 Siegel David AMATH456 Section 001

229 Siegel David MATH247 Section 00132 Sivaloganathan Sivabal AMATH453 Section 001

199 Sivaloganathan Sivabal MATH137 Section 006262 SkrzydloDiana Katherine STAT334 Section 001248 SkrzydloDiana Katherine STAT230 Section 002275 SmallChristopher G STAT901 Section 001159 SmithPaula T. MATH127 Section 005209 SmithPaula T. MATH207 Section 001147 SohailNasir N MATH104 Section 001237 SpronkNicolaas PMATH451/PMATH651 Section 00134 StastnaMarek M AMATH463/AMATH663 Section 001

216 StephensonJonathan MATH235 Section 003109 StinsonDouglas R CS341 Section 001110 StinsonDouglas R CS341 Section 00286 StorjohannArne CS240Section 00285 StorjohannArne CS240Section 001

Fall 2015 Course Evaluations Page 287

247 StruthersCyntha STAT230 Section 001215 Szpojankowski Kamil MATH235 Section 00216 Tan Ken S ACTSC612 Section 0016 Tan Ken S ACTSC371 Section 001

190 ThompsonAlan Matthew MATH135 Section 026108 Toman David CS338Section 00165 Tompkins Dave CS135 Section 00169 Tompkins Dave CS135 Section 005

140 Trefler Richard CS745/ECE725 Section 001172 Trelford Ryan MATH135 Section 008171 Trelford Ryan MATH135 Section 00792 Van Beek Peter CS245 Section 00195 Van Beek Peter CS245 Section 00496 Van Beek Peter CS245 Section 00513 Van Kooten Christopher John ACTSC463 Section 001

187 VanderBurgh Ian W T MATH135 Section 02387 Vasiga Troy Michael John CS241 Section 00188 Vasiga Troy Michael John CS241 Section 00237 Vavasis Stephen CO250 Section 002

191 Vicente Colmenares Alejandra MATH136 Section 001206 Vinette Francine MATH138 Section 00361 Vogel Daniel CS115 Section 01023 VrscayEdward R AMATH231 Section 00143 Wagner David G CO430/CO630 Section 00127 Waite Michael L. AMATH271 Section 001

162 Waite Michael L. MATH127 Section 008132 Wang Tao CS458/CS658Section 001141 Watrous John CS766/QIC820 Section 001

9 Weng Chengguo ACTSC431/ACTSC831 Section 00125 West Joseph John AMATH250 Section 00224 West Joseph John AMATH250 Section 001

219 West Joseph John MATH237 Section 00122 Wirjanto Tony ACTSC974/STAT974 Section 001

220 Wolczuk Dan Sean Terry MATH237 Section 002214 Wolczuk Dan Sean Terry MATH235 Section 001218 Wolczuk Dan Sean Terry MATH235 Section 00547 Wolkowicz Henry CO463/CO663 Section 001

122 Wong Bernard CS350 Section 003121 Wong Bernard CS350 Section 002192 Wood Peter J MATH136 Section 002

8 Wood Peter J ACTSC372 Section 001145 Wood, Peter J MATBUS471 Section 001164 XiaoStanley Yao MATH128 Section 00142 XuWei CO372 Section 001

107 XuWei CS335 Section 001163 Yawney John MATH127 Section 00999 ZhangCheng CS246Section 002

101 ZhangCheng CS246Section 004261 ZhangChong STAT333 Section 002260 ZhangChong STAT333 Section 00117 ZhuMu ACTSC613 Section 001

255 ZhuYe ying STAT330 Section 001256 ZhuYe ying STAT330 Section 002152 ZhuYi M ATH114 Section 001153 ZhuYi M ATH114 Section 002