course outcomes.com_hour_2_table_of_specifications
DESCRIPTION
Aligning Outcomes, Instruction, and Assessment(3 trainings)There is an entire field dedicated to the science of instruction. This training will provide the tools to review your existing courses to see if they are following the best practices of planning, delivering, and assessing learning outcomes of your course. This part 2 of 3 focuses on building a table of specifications or test blueprint to measure your desired learning outcomes.TRANSCRIPT
- 1. In April 2011, The CPE PhD, LLC became Course Outcomes, LLC.
The training materials are referred to in this packet are owned and
copyrighted by Course Outcomes, LLC and can only be used for free
trainings. They may not be rebranded nor sold without express
written permission from Course Outcomes.
Course Outcomes and The CPE PhD
2011 Course Outcomes, www.courseoutcomes.com
2. Thank you for using The CPE PhDs training services. The
content of this training is copyrighted by The CPE PhD and may not
be resold, repackaged, or printed for profit.Organization Members
may download and repackage materials for their organization but not
for profit without express written permission from The CPE
PhD.
Intro Slide
2011 Course Outcomes, www.courseoutcomes.com
3. Managing Directors Message
An introduction to hour 2: Table of Specifications
or test blueprint
2011 Course Outcomes, www.courseoutcomes.com
4. Table of Specifications
and Test Blueprints
Part II
2011 Course Outcomes, www.courseoutcomes.com
5. Test Construction Philosophy
600 possible items from my course.
My 60 item test.
Suppose you wrote all possible questions for everything your course
has taught a student (600 items or so). If you put all 600 of these
items in a box, and pulled out 60 items, this would be a sample
taken from your population of 600 items.
A test is a sample of items you could have asked.
2011 Course Outcomes, www.courseoutcomes.com
6. Test Construction Philosophy
Most of us do not have time to write 600 items, nor would we leave
our certification tests up to a random drawing, so we create a
structure to test the more important elements of our course.
600 possible items from my course.
My 60 item test.
I dont have time to write 600 items so Im going to write 6 items on
history of SOX, 4 items on section 2, etc.
2011 Course Outcomes, www.courseoutcomes.com
7. Test Construction Philosophy
We also use intuitive reasoning to tell us that if a person can
answer one item, they could probably answer another item.(e.g. If a
person correctly knows the square root of 81 and 36, then how
likely is it that they know the square root of 25?)
Exactly how many items we need to write to make a generalization
that a student knows the content can be answered intuitively via
your experience or verified by a psychometrician.
Psychometrician is a fancy way of saying professional test
writer.
2011 Course Outcomes, www.courseoutcomes.com
8. The way a student judges if your test is fair is by three
criteria:
1) Is your item sample a fair representation of what they should or
could have learned?
Is your test aligned with your instruction?
That test had nothing to do with what we learned!
2011 Course Outcomes, www.courseoutcomes.com
9. The way a student judges if your test is fair is by three
criteria:
2) Is a score on the 60 item test generalizable to the larger pool
of what the student has learned in the course?
Is your test generalizable?
This test score doesnt really show all that I have learned.
2011 Course Outcomes, www.courseoutcomes.com
10. The way a student judges if your test is fair is by three
criteria:
3) Do the 60 items represent (in a fairly weighted fashion) all
possible items you could have asked or did you over/under emphasize
some points?
Is your test fairly weighted?
My tests only focus on my favorite parts of my course.
Have you ever had a professor like this?
2011 Course Outcomes, www.courseoutcomes.com
11. Purpose of this Training
Construct a fair test that is aligned with your instruction.
Once your generalinstructional objectives and specific learning
outcomes are established you are now prepared to create what is
called a Table of Specifications.
2011 Course Outcomes, www.courseoutcomes.com
12. The table of specifications serves as guide for both
instruction and assessment.
Table of Specifications
2011 Course Outcomes, www.courseoutcomes.com
13. The table of specifications is a table or matrix that has three
parts:
A list of content areas
A list of student abilities
Number of Test items
Both the content area and student abilities are derived from your
SLOs.
Table of Specifications
2011 Course Outcomes, www.courseoutcomes.com
14. GIO Students will understand the background of Sarbanes-Oxley
legislation.
SLO Students will be able to identify specific dates and events
surrounding the Sarbanes-Oxley legislation.
As an Example
2011 Course Outcomes, www.courseoutcomes.com
15. SLO Students will be able to identify specific dates and events
surrounding the Sarbanes-Oxley legislation.
2011 Course Outcomes, www.courseoutcomes.com
16. SLO Students will be able to identify specific dates and events
surrounding the Sarbanes-Oxley legislation.
2011 Course Outcomes, www.courseoutcomes.com
17. SLO Students will be able to identify specific dates and events
surrounding the Sarbanes-Oxley legislation.
2011 Course Outcomes, www.courseoutcomes.com
18. SLO Students will be able to identify specific dates and events
surrounding the Sarbanes-Oxley legislation.
2011 Course Outcomes, www.courseoutcomes.com
19. SLO Students will be able to identifyspecific dates and events
surrounding the Sarbanes-Oxley legislation.
2011 Course Outcomes, www.courseoutcomes.com
20. Now we are ready to begin planning how many
items should be written.
Notice that you can write several items in each cell that assess
students ability to do something with the content.
On what date was the Sarbanes-Oxley legislation passed?
June 24, 2001
October 23, 2003
January 3, 2005
December 4, 2008
What event spurred the passing of the Sarbanes-Oxley
legislation?
Exxon Valdees Disaster
Enron Scandal
Other plausible but incorrect option
Other plausible but incorrect option
2011 Course Outcomes, www.courseoutcomes.com
21. An example of
a table of specifications
2011 Course Outcomes, www.courseoutcomes.com
22. 2011 Course Outcomes, www.courseoutcomes.com
23. As an example, maybe with audit committees and independent
auditors students only need to identify certain guidelines but will
never need to implement any procedures regarding these
topics.
Notice also that with the exception of the cells with zeros, no
cell has less than 2 items.
The numbers represent the number of test items written for each
specific learning outcome.
Note that some cells have zeros
This would be done if you plan on having more than one assessment
covering the same content.
(e.g.assessments for each day as well as a post-assessment)
Otherwise you run the risk of the students seeing the same item on
two different exams.
This will happen when content does not lend itself to a particular
student ability.
2011 Course Outcomes, www.courseoutcomes.com
24. When selecting items for a test it is important to ensure that
the test items reflect the emphasis of your instruction.
Alignment of instruction
and assessment
2011 Course Outcomes, www.courseoutcomes.com
25. For example if hypothetically you spend 90% of your time
teaching about financial disclosures
Alignment of instruction
and assessment
2011 Course Outcomes, www.courseoutcomes.com
26. For example if hypothetically you spend 90% of your time
teaching about financial disclosuresand 10% of your time teaching
about internal controls,
Alignment of instruction
and assessment
2011 Course Outcomes, www.courseoutcomes.com
27. For example, if hypothetically you spend 90% of your time
teaching about audit controls and 10% of your time teaching
accounting statistics, you would want this ratio to be reflected in
the test questions.
Alignment of instruction
and assessment
2011 Course Outcomes, www.courseoutcomes.com
28. 90% of your instruction teaching Y
90% of your
test assessing Y
2011 Course Outcomes, www.courseoutcomes.com
29. With this principle in mind an actual table of specifications
may look like this:
Alignment of instruction
and assessment
2011 Course Outcomes, www.courseoutcomes.com
30. 2011 Course Outcomes, www.courseoutcomes.com
31. Now you will be able to see what percentage of the content and
student abilities are sampled by your test.
2011 Course Outcomes, www.courseoutcomes.com
32. 2011 Course Outcomes, www.courseoutcomes.com
33. At this point you can ask yourself, Do these percentages
reflect the emphasis of my instruction and course
assignments?
These percentages are calculated
by all of the items in the table; in this case 24.
2/24 = 8%
This means that 8% of the test covers specific dates and
events.
It also means that 38% of the assessmenttests students ability to
identify
If not you may need tomake adjustments to your -
by dividing the number of items in this entire row
Test
Instruction
and/or
Specific Learning Outcomes
2011 Course Outcomes, www.courseoutcomes.com
34. Your Assignment
Create a table of specifications for your course which
reflects:
(1) a balance of instruction and assessment (i.e. 25% of my
instruction focuses on achieving this SLO so my test will measure
25% on this SLO).
(2) the number of items which should be written.
Ensure that your table of specifications has rows for the content,
columns for student abilities, and numbers in the cells
representing the number of items you will write.
The content and student abilities will be taken from the specific
learning outcomes you prepared for the first assignment.
2011 Course Outcomes, www.courseoutcomes.com
35. CPE PhD test creation tool
2011 Course Outcomes, www.courseoutcomes.com
36. CPE PhD test creation tool
2011 Course Outcomes, www.courseoutcomes.com
37. CPE PhD test creation tool
2011 Course Outcomes, www.courseoutcomes.com
38. CPE PhD test creation tool
39. CPE PhD test creation tool
40. CPE PhD test creation tool
41. CPE PhD test creation tool
2011 Course Outcomes, www.courseoutcomes.com
42. If you have any questions or need assistance check the
discussion board or contact Dr. Daniel Winder at the
[email protected]
www.courseoutcomes.com
2011 Course Outcomes, www.courseoutcomes.com