courtesy notice from a ‘sovereign [de jure]’ · pdf filepage 1 of 27 courtesy...

of 27

COURTESY NOTICE FROM A ‘SOVEREIGN [DE JURE]’

TO: Tony Abbott

Parliament House

RG109

Canberra ACT 2600

TO: John Key

Parliament Buildings

Private Bag 18041

Wellington 6160

New Zealand

TO: Commissioner Andrew Scipione APM

NSW Police Force Headquarters

1 Charles Street

Parramatta NSW 2150

TO: Commissioner Peter Marshall

180 Molesworth Street

Wellington 6011 New Zealand

FROM: Chief Justice [De Jure]

[Assembled Owners] The Rules Committee [Original Land Court]

Live Birth Record Registration Number 699/70[De Jure] Sovereign

Paremata [Parliament] of Baludarri Rangihou

c/o Post Office Box 9144

Harris Park NSW 2150

Australia & New Zealand

Date: 17TH

September 2013

__________________________________________________________________________________________

IN THE MATTER OF: DECLARATION OF SOVEREIGNTY 2013

OF SOVEREIGN [DE JURE]

Registered Post Registration Number

514432688014


RR144722605AU


514432745014


RR 144722027AU

MASTER LETER

of 27

GONDWANNA LAND [AUSTRALIA] & NIU TIRENI [NEW ZEALAND] Gazette: London, Australia & New Zealand

Notification: Her Majesty The Queen

Notification: Royal Navy

IN THE MATTER OF: In joining the ‘Sovereign [De Jure] Kings and Queens in God’s Kingdom’, Queen Turikatuku

III Sovereign’ of the House of Paremata [De Jure], Live Birth Record Registration Number 699/70 [NZ] and

Executor, Administrator, Sovereign, Heir, Successor and Beneficial Owner of Deceased Estate [Jenny Robin][De

facto] 1970115820 [NZ] is alive and well.

NOTICE OF CLAIM OF RIGHT: To all to whom these presents shall come, Know ye, that, “Maori Queen

Turikatuku III Sovereign {De Jure} of the House of Paremata” of the continents known as Gondwanna Land

[Australia] & Niu Tireni [New Zealand], do hereby solemnly declare that she has reclaimed her Sovereignty

henceforth, Dated this Ninth Day of the Ninth Month in the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand and Thirteen.

DULY VERIFIED DECLARATION OF FACTS: As an “Original Tribal Woman” of “blood and heritage” of Aotearoa

and Australia, she is a direct descendant of Maori Warrior Chief Mahia, Maori Chieftainess Turikura [War

Tohunga ’Expert’], Maori Warrior Chief Hongi Hika [wife] First Century Maori Warrior Queen Turikatuku II [War

Tohunga ‘Expert’], Maori Nga Puhi Chief Hone Heke, Maori Nga Puhi Chief Te Pahi, Maori Nga Puhi Chief Te

Ruki Kawiti, Sovereign Chief Justice and Royal Regent to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II - Hohepa Mapiria

Murphy, Te Christopher Harris (Parramatta), Charles Baron de Thierry, whangai [tribally adopted] into the

Darug Tribe of Parramatta, does affirm that she is consciously aware, she is a “Sovereign Being” “Heir”

“Successor”, living in a “Sovereign Estate” in the “Greater Universe Continuum”. She is integrally interlocked

to the immutable laws of the “Natural Element” wherein her inalienable “Sovereignty” is constituted in

interlocutory law. “Maori Queen Turikatuku III Sovereign [De Jure] of the House of Paremata” of the

continents known as Gondwanna Land [Australia] & Niu Tireni [New Zealand], is indisputably a descendant of

the Tribes Ngati Tautahi, Ngati Hine, Ngati Hau, Ngati Manu, Ngati Wai, Ngati Kahu, Te Rarawa, Ngapuhi -

TAITOKERAU, Ngati Rangi, Ngāitai - TAINUI, Ngati Tuwharetoa – TE ARAWA, TAKITIMU, Tuhoe, Nga Tai,

Whakatohea – MATAATUA and Original whangai (adopted) DARUG TRIBE descent, currently residing in the

Sovereign state of New South Wales, Australia alongside the “Originals” as; a) Kaitiakitanga [Guardianship] of

Rangihou Sacred Burial Site in Parematta, New South Wales of Australia, and b) Sovereign Chief Justice

[Assembled Owners] of The Rules Committee [Original Land Court], Paremata [Parliament] of Baludarri

Rangihou, New South Wales, Australia & New Zealand, and c) Tribal Leader of Te Kotahitanga Rangihou

Marae, Rangihou Paremata, New South Wales of Australia, registered council of Te OneOne United Tribes of

the World ID Number 22082014, Individual ID Number 18081970.

DO DECLARE AND PROCLAIM TO: Her Majesty the Queen; Heirs; Successors; All Governor Generals of the

Commonwealth of the World, The Prime Minister of Great Britain; House of Lords Westminster; All subjects of

Her Majesty the Queen; Heirs; Successors; and The Representatives of the Corporation Victoria, (The London

Square Mile); Prime Ministers of Aust & NZ; Registrar General of Aust & NZ; All Attorney-General’s in the

Commonwealth of the World; The De facto Government/Parliament of Aust & NZ; All [de facto] Principles,

Agents, Employees and Accommodation Party; All [de facto] Ministers of Parliament Aust & NZ; All [de facto]

Councils Aust & NZ; All [de facto] Citizens of the New South Wales Land Company Ship and all other Statute

Created Incorporated Fictitious entities Internal and External, unlawfully operating in their natural [de facto]

state, on this land of Australia and New Zealand.

DO DECLARE AND PROCLAIM THAT: The Sovereign [De Jure] Assembled Owners [Australia and New Zealand],

The Rules Committee [Original Land Court], Paremata [Parliament] of Baludarri Rangihou, [Australia & New

Zealand] Upper House, commenced business on the 9th

day of September 2013.

DO DECLARE AND PROCLAIM THAT: Under the ‘cloak of peace’, “Maori Queen Turikatuku III Sovereign [De

Jure] of the House of Paremata” of the continents known as Gondwanna Land [Australia] & Niu Tireni [New

Zealand], does stand in the same light as Queen Elizabeth II against any attempts on ‘our sovereignty’,

guaranteed in perpetual harmony by King William IV and Maori Warrior Chief Hongi Hika 1814. With full

sovereign rights powers, privileges and International Protection of the New Zealand National United Tribes

Flag 1835. Her Majesty’s representatives are inarguably bound by Oath to the Most High Source of Creation to

of 27

honor, respect and defend that ‘New Zealand National United Tribes Flag 1835’ and the people of Niu Tireni

[New Zealand], encompassing all tribes and cultures in the Pacific Ocean, including the ‘Originals of

Gondwanna Land [Australia]’.

DO DECLARE AND PROCLAIM THAT: Sovereign Chief Justice of The Original Land Court, Paremata Gondwanna

Land [Australia] & Niu Tireni [New Zealand], is authorized to notify Her Majesty’s Royal Defence Force,

immediately….“to arrest and take into custody any and all certain states of body, their agents, officers, and

other actors, regardless of domicil by choice, owning, operating, aiding and abetting private money systems,

issuing, collection, legal enforcement systems, operating SLAVERY SYSTEMS against any and all “Sovereign [De

Jure]”.

DO DECLARE AND PROCLAIM THAT WE HAVE TRIBALLY ADOPTED: He Wakaputanga o te Rangatiratanga o Nu

Tireni 1835 [Declaration of Independence 1835]; Agreed to unanimously via Special Resolution on this 19th

day

of April 2013, in the presence of Sovereign [De Jure] Hereditary Tribal Chiefs Nambrimbrii; Terei Hape; Rewi

Haukore and Turikatuku III Gumada & Others. The Declaration of Independence 1835 has further been

amended for the Original “Sovereign [De Jure]” of Gondwanna Land [Australia] via Special Resolution as

follows:

Article 1. We, the Hereditary Chiefs and Heads of the Tribes of Gondwanna Land [Australia], being Assembled

at and near Rangihou, Baludarri, Paremata NSW Australia on this 19th day of April 2013, Declare the

Independence of Our Sovereign [De Jure] Country, which is hereby Constituted and Declared to be an

Independent State, under the Designation of “Confederation of Chiefs of the United Tribes of Gondwanna

Land [Australia]”.

Article 2. All Sovereign [De Jure] Power and Authority within the (but not limited to) States, Territories and

Islands of Gondwanna Land [Australia], is hereby Declared to Reside Entirely and Exclusively with the Original

Sovereign [De Jure] Hereditary Chiefs and Heads of Tribes in their Collective Capacity, who also Declare that

they will “Not permit any Legislative Authority Separate from themselves in their Collective Capacity to Exist”,

nor “Any Function of Government to be Exercised within the said States, Territories and Islands”, “Unless by

[de facto] Persons Appointed by them”, and “Acting under the Authority of Laws Regularly Enacted by them in

Congress Assembled”.

Article 3. The Sovereign [De Jure] Hereditary Chiefs and Heads of Tribes Agree to Meet in Congress at and near

Rangihou Baludarri, Paremata NSW Australia on the 28th

day of October, each year, for “The Purpose of

Framing Laws for the Dispensation of Justice”, “The preservation of Peace and Good Order”, and the

“Regulation of Trade”, and they cordially invite all other Sovereign [De Jure] Tribes of Gondwanna Land

[Australia], to lay aside their private animosities and to consult the safety and welfare of our Common Country,

by joining the “Confederation of Chiefs of the United Tribes of Gondwanna Land [Australia] & Niu Tireni [New

Zealand] and others.

Article 4. They also agree to send a copy of this Declaration to ‘Her Majesty, the Queen of England; Heirs;

Successors”, to thank her for her acknowledgement of the “International Protectorate 1835 Niu Tireni [New

Zealand] National United Tribes Flag”; and in Return for the Friendship and Protection they have shown, are

prepared to show, to such of “Her Subjects as have Settled in their Country Gondwanna Land [Australia] & Niu

Tireni [New Zealand] ”, or “Resorted to its shores for the Purposes of Trade”, they entreat that “She will

Continue to be the Parent of their Infant State, Territories and Islands”, and that “She will become its Protector

from All Attempts upon its Independence”.

DO DECLARE AND PROCLAIM THAT: The British Government, through the House of Commons, ratified the “He

Wakaputanga o te Rangatiratanga o Nu Tireni [The Declaration of Independence 1835]” and acknowledged the

Confederation title to the soil and sovereignty as indisputable. The Constitution Act 1852 (United Kingdom)

Section 71, acknowledges the Maori rights to Self Government which is still current today Section 71 says; that

Her Majesty acknowledges Maori rights to make laws, customs and usages under the government of

themselves. The Sovereign Maori Nations of Aotearoa DO NOT require any permission whatsoever from any

Government Body or International organization to exercise full Sovereign Power and/or Authority.

DO DECLARE AND PROCLAIM THAT: All “Sovereigns [De Jure]” will be internationally protected with the

Crown Protectorates and Common Law Doctrine: Magna Carta, Section 39; Halsbury’s Statutes 3rd edition,

Volume 36 - Statutes, paragraph 559 page 337 paragraph 12, 12(1); Standing Orders; Te Tiriti O Waitangi 1840

[Treaty of Waitangi 1840]; New Zealand Constitution Act (United Kingdom) 1846 section 10; 1846 Royal

Charter and Instructions, chapter xiv; and Te Ture Whenua Maori Maori Land Act 1993 [International

of 27

Protectorate]; and the Pacific Islanders Protection Act 1872 & 1875 (38 &39 Vict. c. 51.). Furthermore, adopt

for and to protect the Land, the Letters Patent and have the full rights and powers of letters Patent.

DO DECLARE AND PROCLAIM TO: Adopt for and to protect the Land, namely; (i) Charter of the United Nations

and Statute of the International Court of Justice 1845; and (ii) Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948; and

(iii) International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination 1969; and

(iv) International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1976; and (v) The Declaration on the Rights of the

Indigenous Peoples 1994-2007; and (vi) The International Bill of Human Rights 1948; and (vii) General

Assembly resolution 1803 (XVII) of 14 December 1962, "Permanent sovereignty over natural resources" and

(viii) Charter of the United Nations and (viiii) International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights

1976 and (x) International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1976 and (xi) Optional Protocol to the

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1976 with special attention to THE CORE INTERNATIONAL

HUMAN RIGHTS INSTRUMENTS and their monitoring bodies.

NOTICE OF CLAIM OF RIGHT: The Lores [Tikanga, Customary], Laws, customs and usages of the “Original

Sovereigns [De Jure]”, so far as they are not repugnant to the general principals of Humanity, shall be

maintained for the Government of themselves, in all their relations to, and dealings with each other, and that

particular territories shall be set apart within and by such Lores [Tikanga, Customary], Laws, Customs and

Usages, to fulfill the aspirations, prosperity and well-being by virtue of the Land, that the Original Sovereign

[De Jure] freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural

development, and in so doing, strive for the goodness of humanity to eliminate famine, disease and suffering

to all people and to rid war and violence to such territories to embrace all of mankind with the dignity and

spirit of God’s grace.

DO DECLARE AND PROCLAIM THAT: Any and all “Sovereigns [De Jure]” DO NOT CONSENT to any unlawful and

illegal devaluing, diminishing, abrogating, subjugating, subordinating, usurping, invading, violating or theft of

“Sovereign [De Jure]” duly secured BE'ing, any and all creations there from, and property thereof.

NOTICE OF DEFAULT: Any and all ‘person’; ’agent’; ‘officer’; ‘citizen’; ‘servant’; ‘justice of the peace’; ‘police’

and [de facto] ‘actors’ of the Australia and/or New Zealand [de facto] Government, is cautioned that if any

subjects of the Crown should impinge or usurp on a “Sovereign [De Jure]” rights or status, ‘‘person’; ’agent’;

‘officer’; ‘citizen’; ‘servant’; ‘justice of the peace’; ‘police’ and [de facto] ‘actors’ of the Australia and/or New

Zealand [de facto] Government will be cautioned with the ‘Courtesy Notice from Sovereign [De Jure]’ and

informed of their compounding and accumulating liability through instructing, directing, or conspiring with

colleagues in pursuing damaging actions against any and all “Sovereign [De Jure]”. Should colleagues so

instruct detrimental damage against any and all “Sovereign [De Jure]”, they will be made jointly and severally

liable, through ‘Principal Agent’ of The Original Land Court, Paremata Gondwanna Land [Australia] & Niu Tireni

[New Zealand].

NOTICE OF UNDERSTANDING: Any and all ‘person’; ’agent’; ‘officer’; ‘citizen’; ‘servant’; ‘justice of the peace’;

‘police’ and [de facto] ‘actors’ of the Australia and/or New Zealand [de facto] Government, is cautioned of its

compounding and accumulating liability through instructing, directing, or conspiring with colleagues in

pursuing Kidnapping actions against any and all “Sovereign [De Jure]. ”In the event that a Sovereign [De Jure]

shall be intentionally kidnapped, the Sovereign [De Jure] Chief Justice of The Original Land Court, Paremata,

Gondwanna Land [Australia] & Niu Tireni [New Zealand] will activate an International Kidnapping

Management Plan. All and any parties involved will be charged accordingly for claims of compensation for

injury, damage or death, filed by the Sovereign [De Jure] Chief Justice of The Original Land Court, Paremata,

Gondwanna Land [Australia] & Niu Tireni [New Zealand].

NOTICE OF UNDERSTANDING: Any and all ‘person’; ’agent’; ‘officer’; ‘citizen’; ‘servant’; ‘justice of the peace’;

‘police’ and [de facto] ‘actors’ of the Australia and/or New Zealand [de facto] Government, is cautioned that

The High Court Judge of The Original Land Court, Paremata, Gondwanna Land [Australia] & Niu Tireni [New

Zealand], is authorized to notify Her Majesty’s Royal Defence Force, immediately….“to arrest and take into

custody any and all certain states of body, their agents, officers, and other actors, regardless of domicil by

choice, owning, operating, aiding and abetting private money systems, issuing, collection, legal enforcement

systems, operating SLAVERY SYSTEMS against any and all “Sovereign [De Jure]”.

of 27

NOTICE OF DEFAULT: If any Subjects of the Crown should impinge or usurp on the Global Immunity and/or

indisputable rights or status of any and all “Sovereign [De Jure]”, it will be seen as an Act of Treason, Act 1571

and Crimes Act 1961; and a blatant disrespect of Jurisprudence under Gods Lore/Law, Common and

International Law, Original and Maori [Tikanga, Customary] Lore/Law.

Declaration made on this 16th

Day of September 2013 AD.

This Notice is filed by the Assembled Owners, Paremata [Parliament] of Baludarri Rangihou, Original Land

Court [Rules Committee] by Principal Representative c/o Post Office Box 9144, Harris Park NSW 2150

Australia.

___________________________________________________________________________

IN THE MATTER OF: SOVEREIGN REDRESS 2013

IN THE MATTER OF: Unlimited personal liability arising from, causing and resulting in any

and all damage, to any and all ‘Sovereign [De Jure]’

of

Gondwanna Land [Australia & Niu Tireni [New Zealand]

TAKE NOTE THAT due to the significant International disrespect for the freedoms, rights and privileges of

any and all SOVEREIGNS [De Jure], Cheif Justice [De Jure], Paremata of Baludarri Rangihou, places no faith in

the integrity of the legality and actions of the Australia & New Zealand [De Facto] Governments; the Police

Departments and it’s agents; or the Judicial System; As a ‘Sovereign [De Jure]’on the land.

TAKE NOTE THAT Cheif Justice [De Jure] respects the Internal and External operations of the Australian and

New Zealand Police Department in its natural [De Facto] state and the ongoing role that they are required to

perform everyday for the [De Facto] citizens and subjects of Australia & New Zealand.

DO DECLARE AND PROCLAIM THAT: The Sovereign [De Jure] Assembled Owners [Australia and New Zealand],

The Rules Committee [Original Land Court], Paremata [Parliament] of Baludarri Rangihou, [Australia & New

Zealand] Upper House, commenced business on the 9th

day of September 2013.

Therefore take note...

DULY VERIFIED DECLARATION OF FACTS:

With regard to operating or perpetuating any and all private money systems, issuing, collection, legal

enforcement systems and any and all SLAVERY SYSTEMS of and against any and all ‘Sovereign Proponent [De

Jure]’ ; As ‘Chief Justice [De Jure]’ I am only able to converse with you; ‘person’; ’agent’; ‘officer’; ‘citizen’;

‘servant’; ‘justice of the peace’; ‘police’ [De Facto], in my capacity as Chief Justice, Sovereign [De Jure] of The

Rules Committee [Original Land Court], Paremata [Parliament] of Baludarri Rangihou [Australia & New

Zealand]. I have and do knowingly, willingly, and intentionally adopt, reconfirm, and duly ratify said

DECLARATION OF FACTS for any and all ‘Sovereign [De Jure]’ as a duly verified due DECLARATION OF FACTS,

nunc pro tunc praetere a preterea, unrebutted as a matter of law, as matter of fact, and as a matter of public

policy, hereafter any and all Sovereigns referred to as ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ .

1: ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ is not required by your law as a ‘Sovereign [De Jure]’to comply with any

Notice of any offence alleged by the [De Facto] Parliament of Australia & New Zealand nor any of its agents,

officers assigned, actors or representatives.

2: ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ is not required by your law to comply with an opinion of any “Court” unless

it is an opinion of that Court, AT LAW, with that opinion complying with the obligations of the Court, the State

and the Commonwealth under International Law pursuant to any and all UN Human Rights and or other

treaties and Covenants and Protocols to which the Commonwealth of Australia & New Zealand is a State Party.

of 27

3: ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ is not required by your law to comply with any assertion that any

purported “Court” is a “Court” unless that “Court” can, prior to the commencement or continuance of any

hearing in respect of any matter concerning ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ in that purported “Court”,

provides to ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ evidence of:

3.1: the “Courts” Source of power.

3.2: the “Courts” Head of power

3.3: the “Courts” authority

3.4: the “Courts” Jurisdiction.

3.5: the validity of any State or Federal “Constitution” or other document relied upon by the “Court”

to evidence the points listed in 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, and 3.4 above.

4: ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ cannot be forced to defend any Notice of any offence alleged by Australia &

New Zealand”

4.1: (In respect of any suggested and or purported authority or power, which is suggested and or

purported to have been issued by any foreign power, whether a government, parliament and or a

monarch, in respect of any allegation made against ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ , its members or

its beneficiaries) having that suggested and or purported authority validated by the United Nations or

other RELEVANT competent entity, in respect of the supposed and or purported lawful application

against ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ of that purported authority or power, including:

4.1.1: The Government of the United Kingdom,

4.1.2: “The Queen of Australia & New Zealand” – being –Queen Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom at

Buckingham Palace, London SW1A 1AA.

4.1.3: The United Nations.

4.1.4: The European Union Government (which owns ALL British legislation “Whenever it was

created”).

4.1.5: All governments of the Commonwealth and States and Territories of the Commonwealth of

Australia & New Zealand.

5: No purported or actual “Court” within the Commonwealth of Australia & New Zealand” has a legal capacity

to hear any matter and or execute any judgment against ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ in respect of any

matter brought before any “Court”.

6: Neither Australia & New Zealand” nor its agents, assigns, actors, officers nor representatives have the

authority to:

6.1: exercise any authority under any Act or Law against or in respect of ‘Sovereign Proponent [De

Jure]’ as this Act is an Act of the Parliament of Great Britain and Northern Ireland which has it’s seat

of power at Westminster, London, England; and

6.1.2: No officer or agent of the Commonwealth of Australia & New Zealand or any State and or

Territory of the Commonwealth of Australia & New Zealand can exercise any authority derived from

the British Act “An Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia & New Zealand” over a

Sovereign, Independent, Original man, woman or child [De Jure].

7: Any officer or agent of the Commonwealth of Australia & New Zealand, or of any State and or Territory of

the Commonwealth of Australia & New Zealand, who exercises any authority derived from the British Act “An

Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia & New Zealand” or any other Act of any other foreign power

over any and all ‘Sovereign [De Jure]’, is in breach of the rights as bound by;

(i) Charter of the United Nations and Statute of the International Court of Justice 1845; and

(ii) Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948; and


(iv) International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1976; and

(v) The Declaration on the Rights of the Indigenous Peoples 1994-2007; and

(vi) The International Bill of Human Rights 1948; and

(vii) General Assembly resolution 1803 (XVII) of 14 December 1962, "Permanent sovereignty over

natural resources" and

(viii) Charter of the United Nations and

(ix) International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights 1976 and

(x) International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1976 and

of 27

(xi) Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1976 with special

attention to THE CORE INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTRUMENTS and their monitoring

bodies.

8: At no point in time did ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ consent to the ALLEGED AND AS YET

UNSUBSTANTIATED presumption that ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ is or ever was subject to the jurisdiction

of the British or quasi-British-Australia & New Zealand parliaments or their agents, assigns, actors,

representatives or officers.

9: ALL “Courts” at ALL levels including the ILLEGITIMATE and ILLEGAL “Courts” of Australia & New Zealand are

obliged to protect my rights:

9.1: in accordance with Divine Law, and,

9.2: in accordance with Natural Law, and,

9.3: in accordance with the Common Law, and,

9.4: in accordance with the Tikanga, and,

9.5: in accordance with the Customary Lore, and,

9.6: in accordance with the Maori Lore, and,

9.7: in accordance with the Originee Lore, and,

10: Statute and seminal constitutional laws of Australia and New Zealand are NULL! and VOID! Because statute

law has no written constitution, and to impinge or usurp my Sovereign status of the “Sovereign Maori &

Original Nation” will be seen as an Act of Treason Act 1571 and a blatant disrespect of Jurisprudence under

Gods law, Common and International Lore/Law. We have seen this strategy succeed in disposing Sovereigns

worldwide including but not limited to; the American Indians, the Asian Indians, the Asian Chinese, the

Africans, The Sicilians, parts of Italy, the Hawaiians, the Australian Originals and the tribal Originals of New

Zealand.

11: The United Nations International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Part 1, and Article 1,

Section 1 states:

11.1: “All people have the right of self-determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine

their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development.”

12: The United Nations Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and

Political Rights, Article 1, states:

12.1: “A State Party to the Covenant that becomes a Party to the present Protocol recognizes the

competence of the Committee to receive and consider communications from individuals subject to its

jurisdiction who claim to be victims of a violation by that State Party of any of the rights set forth in

the Covenant. No communication shall be received by the Committee if it concerns a State Party to

the Covenant, which is not a Party to the present Protocol.”

13: The Charter of the United Nations, Article 2, Sections 1, 2, and 4 state:

13.1: (Section 1) The Organization is based on the principle of the sovereign equality of all its

Members.

13.2: (Section 2) All Members, in order to ensure to all of them the rights and benefits resulting from

membership, shall fulfill in good faith the obligations assumed by them in accordance with the

present Charter.

13.3: (Section 4) All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of

force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner

inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.

14: For any “Court” which is convened pursuant to any “law” given “Royal Assent” under the provisions of the

British Act entitled “An Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia Act 1900 UK) to hear any matter

against ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ , as an ‘Sovereign [De Jure]’, Australia & New Zealand is to breach

Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations and to commit and Act of War against ‘Sovereign Proponent [De

Jure]’ .

15: The Geneva Convention, Chapter 1, Article 2, states:

17.1: Chapter 1, Article 2: “In addition to the provisions which shall be implemented in peacetime,

the present Convention shall apply to all cases of declared war or of any other armed conflict which

may arise between two or more of the High Contracting Parties, even if the state of war is not

recognized by one of them.” “The Convention shall also apply to all cases of partial or total

occupation of the territory of a High Contracting Party, even if the said occupation meets with no

armed resistance.” “Although one of the Powers in conflict may not be a party to the present

Convention, the Powers who are parties there to shall remain bound by it in their mutual relations.

of 27

They shall furthermore be bound by the Convention in relation to the said Power, if the latter

accepts and applies the provisions thereof.”

16: All the above items of International Law, or International Agreements, or International Treaties have been

signed by the Government of Australia & New Zealand.

17: Various past and the present Executive Governments of Australia & New Zealand, as the purported

servants of the people who constitute the Commonwealth of Australia & New Zealand, have signed

International Treaties and Covenants with the intent that committal to these Treaties and Covenants which

‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ relies upon in respect of his/her defense in these matters give rise to a

legitimate expectation that these Treaties and Covenants have the purpose of protecting ‘Sovereign Proponent

[De Jure]’ rights pursuant to these Treaties and Covenants.

18: These Covenants and Treaties have also been entered into Australia & New Zealand Law under Acts

bearing titles similar to the titles of the International Agreements. (E.g. The Geneva Convention Act, The

Charter of the United Nations Act, The Human Rights Commission Act etc.)

19: Australia became a belligerent Independent Sovereign State on the 28th of June 1919 when the then Prime

Minister of Australia (William Hughes) signed the Treaty of Versailles.

20: This FACT was FURTHER evidenced in October 1919, when this fact was recorded in the Hansard of the

Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia.

21: This FACT was FURTHER ratified on the 10th of January 1920 when Mr. Hughes and the Australia Deputy

Prime Minister (Sir Joseph Cook) signed the League of Nations Covenant, making the Commonwealth of

Australia a foundation Member.

22: This FACT was FURTHER ratified in June 1945, when Australia became a foundation member of the United

Nations by signing the United Nations Charter.

23: The actions as detailed in paragraphs 21, 22, 23 and 24 above, declared to the World that the

Commonwealth of Australia was an Independent, Sovereign Nation Member State of the League of Nations,

with EQUAL Nation Status as the United Kingdom, and as such Australian Sovereigns were, at the least from

the 10th of January 1920, FREE FROM THE IMPOSITION OF ANY BRITISH LAW - including “An Act to

Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia Act 1900 (UK)”.

24: This was written into Australia law on September 14, 1945 via the Charter of the United Nations Act 1945.

25: From October 1, 1919, or January 10, 1920, or at the very least, June 26, 1945, it became an offence under

International Law to enforce foreign law, including the Domestic Law of the United Kingdom upon the

Australia & New Zealand sovereigns.

26: To do so is to commit an act of treason against the Australia & New Zealand Sovereigns.

NOTE: Apparently only the “Australia & New Zealand” Judiciary, Police and the obviously corrupt political

systems within Australia & New Zealand itself have problems in recognizing these facts. This refusal to accept

these facts apparently stems from an illegitimate and or private/personal intent by the Judiciary, Police and

political systems to oblige the United Kingdom Parliament and Monarch in their continued raping and pillaging

of the natural wealth and resources of the Sovereign [De Jure] Australia & New Zealand.

27: The Full Bench of the High Court of Australia has ruled that the United Kingdom is a power foreign to

Australia. (See Sue v Hill, 1999)

28: For the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia, or the Government of any State or Territory of the

Commonwealth of Australia to permit, encourage and or allow the practice by Australia “Courts” to exercise,

enforce or other wise use any law which stems from any British Act – regardless of when that Act was enacted

– is to COMMIT TREASON against the Sovereigns [De Jure] of Australia & New Zealand.

29: The Full Bench of the High Court of Australia has ruled that International Treaties are binding on all courts

within Australia. (see Teoh)

30: The Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland consists of the House of

Commons, the House of Lords, and the Queen (Queen Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and

Northern Ireland).

31: British Law, being the Act of Settlement 1701 UK, paragraph 7, stipulates that the Queen of the United

Kingdom is the Queen of the United Kingdom ONLY and cannot take her Sovereignty outside the dominions of

England, Scotland or Ireland without the consent of the Parliament, which was specifically denied, statute

barring the Monarchs from extending or construing to extend their sovereignty into the Australasian colonies

and Pacific Islands.

32: This Act has never been repealed.

33: She CANNOT, under law, be the Queen of anywhere else in the world, other than England, Scotland and or

Ireland.

of 27

34: Under British Law if she is the Queen of anywhere else she is committing an act of treason against the

British people, and is assuming the role of an Absolute Monarch by usurping the authority of the Parliament of

the United Kingdom to which the Monarch has been subjective since the time Charles I, lost his head in 1649.

35: The Crown is but a trustee for the public, and for the colonial public as distinct from the general mass of

British interests; a position recognised by the Royal Instructions of 1846 (now in force) by the Australia Waste

Land Sales Act and various other legislative and official documents which provide for the application of the

funds arising from the land sales. The waste lands of a colony are the inheritance of the crown, but only for

the purposes of regulation and administration, not to use at pleasure, not to be granted away for favour or to

be disposed of for the benefit of strangers.

36: The British Government, through the House of Commons, ratified the Declaration of Independence 1835

New Zealand and acknowledged the Confederation title to the soil and my sovereignty as indisputable. The

Constitution Act 1852 (United Kingdom) Section 71, acknowledges the Maori rights to Self Government which

is still current today Section 71 says; that Her Majesty acknowledges Maori rights to make laws, customs and

usages under the government of themselves. The Sovereign Maori Nations of Aotearoa DO NOT require any

permission whatsoever from any Government Body or International organization to exercise full Sovereign

Power and/or Authority.

37: Her Majesty’s representatives are inarguably bound by Oath to the Most High Source of Creation to honor,

respect and defend that ‘New Zealand National United Tribes Flag 1835’ and the people of Aotearoa,

encompassing all tribes and cultures in the Pacific Ocean, including the ‘Originals of Australia’.

38: Following the Restoration, in 1689 William and Mary of Orange came to the throne of England.

39: Before they were crowned, in January 1689, they signed the Declaration of Right which removed from the

Monarch, the power of absolute Monarchy and made the Monarch subjective to the UK parliament, or in

other words the Monarch became a “Monarch in Parliament” as opposed to a “Monarch in Counsel”.

40: In October 1690 the Bill of Rights was passed which, among other things, gave Executive Power in the

United Kingdom to the United Kingdom Parliament. (This was the birth of the ‘Constitutional Monarchy’,

where the Executive Power no longer lay with the monarch.)

41: This has never been changed in British Law.

42: The Journal of Captain Arthur Phillip, leader of the first fleet, shows his Commission and Instructions under

the Act of Parliament Establishing the Colony state, in respect of “Aboriginal”, the following:

42.1: “to endeavour by every possible means to open an intercourse with the natives, and to conciliate

their affections, enjoining all our subjects to live in amity and kindness with them. And if any of Our

subjects shall wantonly destroy them, or give them any unnecessary interruption in the exercise of

their several occupations, it is our will and pleasure that you do cause such offenders to be brought to

punishment.”

43: The Journal of the Judge Advocate General of the first fleet, Captain Collins, in a 1796 entry shows the

following admission of ownership of the land by the Aboriginals / Originees, and the fact the Aboriginals /

Originees, whether it be Australia or New Zealand, had their own system of land ownership and title over their

own private real estates prior to the arrival of the first fleet:

43.1: Their spears and shields, their clubs and lines etc are their own property; they are manufactured

by themselves and are the whole of their personal estate. But, strangely as it may appear, they have

also their real estates. Bennelong [Gondwanna Land], before he went to England and since his return,

often assured me that the island Memel, called by us Goat Island, close by Sydney Cove, was his own

property; that it was his fathers’, and that he should give it to Bygone, his particular friend and

companion. To this little spot he appeared much attached and we have often seen him and his wife

Barrangaroo feasting and enjoying themselves on it. He told us of other people who possessed this

kind of hereditary property, which they retained undisturbed.”

44: In the Address to Select Committee Of The House Of Commons On The Aborigines Wherever British

Settlements Are Made “, of July 1834, it was recorded that:

45.1: the Kings’ “faithful Commons in Parliament assembled are deeply impressed with the duty of

acting upon the principals of justice and humanity in the intercourse and relation of this country (the

United Kingdom) with the native inhabitants of its colonial settlements – of affording them protection

in the enjoyment of their civil rights, and of imparting to them that degree of civilization, and that

religion with which Providence has blessed this nation; and it humbly prays, that his Majesty will take

such measures and give such directions to the Governors and Officers of his Majesty’s’ settlements and

plantations, as shall secure to the natives the due observance, and the protection of their rights –

promote the spread of civilization amongst them, and lead them to the peaceful and voluntary

reception of the Christian religion.”

of 27

46: The then Chancellor of the Exchequor observed, and was recorded as stating that, in respect of the

statement in paragraph 44 above, British Settlements Are Made”, and as stated:

46.1: “So far from being the expression of any new principal, only embodies and recognizes principles

on which the British Government has for a considerable time been disposed to act”.

47: The same Report of the Select Committee Of The House Of Commons On The Aborigines Wherever British

Settlements Are Made” also states:

47.1: It might be presumed that the native inhabitants of any land, have an incontrovertible right to

their own soil; it is a plain and sacred right which seems not to have been understood. Europeans have

entered their borders uninvited, and when there, have not only acted as if they were the undoubted

lords of the soil, but have punished the natives as aggressors if they have evinced a disposition to live

in their own country.”

48: Justice Willis, of the Supreme Court of New South Wales, on 16 September 1841 in a Judgment of the court

stated:

48.1: To elucidate so far as I am able the point for decision, I will first briefly trace the history of this

colony and of the settlement of this district, at the same time remarking on the character which has

been given of the aborigines; and in the second place, state so much of the acknowledged law of

nations and the manner it has been acted upon with regard to Aborigines, as it seems to me to bear

on the subject, adding a few notices of the manner in which uncivilized tribes have been treated with

in other British Colonies, and steps taken in Colonies where English law was in force. I will premise that

policy, or impolicy of an existing system can avail nothing in the present instance. I can never permit

the end to justify any undue means for its accomplishment. This may be policy and wisdom in a

statesman, but it is little less than treason in a judge. He must not wrest the law to his authority, or do

a great right through a little wrong.”

49: In the same Report of the Select Committee Of The House Of Commons On The Aborigines Wherever British

Settlements Are Made” Mr Saxe Bannister, formerly Attorney-General of the colony of New South Wales, is on

the record as to have stated to the committee on 31st August 1835, in respect of Origine law in the Colony:

49.1: “We ought forthwith to begin, at least, to reduce the laws and usages of the Aboriginal tribes to

language, print them, and direct our courts of justice to respect those laws in proper cases.”

50: During the Committees hearings, Mr Saxe Bannister handed a paper to Mr T.F. Buxton, Chairman of the

Committee, dated 19 August 1835, which, under the heading of “Measures Affecting the Swan River and other

New Australian Colonies”, stated:

50.1: “Make treaties with the natives before proceeding further.”



51.1: “…it is the recollection of many living men that every part of this territory was the undisputed

property of the aborigines.”



52.1: Much will depend on the manner in which this colony is considered to have been acquired, and

this brings me in the second place to advert to the law of nations as acknowledged by the British

Government, with regard to Colonial possessions. Colonies, says Mr Clark, in his summary of Colonial

Law, and stated at the Bar by Mr Barry , are acquired by conquest, by cession under treaty, or by

occupancy. By occupancy where an uninhabited country is discovered by British subjects, and is upon

such discovery, adopted or recognized by the British Crown as part of its possessions. In case a colony

be acquired by occupancy, (he adds) the law of England then in being, is immediately and ipso facto in

force in the new settlement. He further states, Australia, was acquired by discovery or simple

occupation. New South Wales was not, however, unoccupied, as we have seen, at the time it was

taken possession of by the colonists, for, “a body of the aborigines appeared on the shore, armed

with spears, which they through down as soon as they found the strangers had no hostile

intention.” This being the case, it does not appear there was any conquest, and it is admitted there

has hitherto been cession under treaty.



52.1: This colony then stands on a different footing from some others for it was neither an unoccupied

place, nor was it obtained by right of conquest and driving out the natives, nor by treaties. Indeed, as

Mr Vattel very justly says, “whoever agrees that robbery is a crime, and that we are not allowed to

take forcible possession of our neighbors property, will acknowledge without any further proof, that

of 27

no nation has the right to expel another people from the country they inhabit in order to settle it

herself.”

54: Further to the limitations imposed upon the “crown”/monarch of the UK Parliament under the Act of

Settlement 1701 UK, there are further, more clearly defined limitations on the purported right of the

“Crown”/monarch of that parliament in respect of the purported legality of its’ extension or construed

extension of its’ sovereignty and or dominion into Gondwanna Land [Australia] & Niu Tireni [Aotearoa / New

Zealand].

55: Section 6 of the Pacific Islander Protection Act 1872-75 clearly limits the purported jurisdiction of the UK

Parliament and its’ monarch to British Subjects ONLY, not Sovereigns.

56: Section 7 of the Pacific Islander Protection Act 1872-75 states:

56.1: Nothing herein or in any such Order in Council shall extend or be construed to extend to invest

Her Majesty with any claim or title whatsoever to dominion or sovereignty over any such islands (ie:

the Pacific Islands) or places as aforesaid (ie: the Australasian Colonies including Australia & New

Zealand), or to derogate from the rights of the tribes or people inhabiting such islands or places, or of

the Chiefs or rulers thereof, to such sovereignty or dominion……….” Clearly excluding the extension of

the purported sovereignty of the parliament of the United Kingdom into the Australasian “Colonies”

and Pacific Islands.

57: The Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia 1900, Chapter 1, Part 1,

Paragraph 1, STILL states:

57.1: “The legislative power of the Commonwealth shall be vested in a Federal Parliament, which shall

consist of the Queen, a Senate, and a House of Representatives, and which is herein-after called “The

Parliament” or “The Parliament of the Commonwealth.”

58: It is clear and irrefutable that the “Queen” referred to in The Act to Constitute the

Commonwealth of Australia 1900, Chapter 1, Part 1, Paragraph 1, is the “Queen” of the Parliament of the

United Kingdom – not the purported and illegal Queen of Australia & New Zealand.

59: The Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia 1900 [63 & 64 Vict.]

(Chapter 12) Paragraph 2, states:

59.1: “The provisions of this Act referring to the Queen shall extend to Her Majesty’s heirs and

successors in the Sovereignty of the United Kingdom.”

60: The Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia 1900, Chapter 1, Part 1, Paragraph 2, states:

60.1: “A Governor-General appointed by the Queen shall be Her Majesty’s representative in the

Commonwealth, and shall have, and may exercise in the Commonwealth during the Queen’s pleasure,

but subject to this Constitution, such powers and functions of the Queen as Her Majesty may be

pleased to assign to him.”

61: The person or entity referred to in The Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia 1900, Chapter 1,

Part 1, Paragraph 2, must be the “Queen” of the Parliament of the United Kingdom which has been

acknowledged as being a Foreign Power – see Sue –v- Hill – High Court 1999.

62: Therefore, section 61 of Clause 9 of the Australia Constitution, which confers Executive Power on the

Queen of the United Kingdom through the various Governors-General, in actual FACT confers executive power

in Australia on the Parliament of the United Kingdom as the Queen cannot, under UK law, bestow any

commissions of appointment (including Writs of Commission for “Australia” Magistrates etc…) without the

approval of the UK Parliament.

63: When it was realized that following Australia’s Independence in 1920, and following the Balfour

Declaration in 1927, the United Kingdom no longer had any executive power over any other independent

nation (e.g: Australia), the UK Parliament passed legislation separating the Queen and the UK Parliament from

the Governors-General of Australia & New Zealand.

64: The Governors-General, the Governors, and the Australia & New Zealand Parliament from then on dealt

with the British Foreign Office, not the British Colonial Office, as did all other independent nations.

65: This was as a result of Australia & New Zealand being recognized by the Parliament and the Monarch of the

United Kingdom as being Independent of the Sovereign control and or authority of the Parliament and or the

Monarch of the British Parliament.

66: The Royal Styles and Titles Act 1973 removed the title ‘Queen of the United Kingdom in Australia’ and

substituted the title ‘Queen of Australia”.

67: Either title is a deception as they both suggest that “Queen Elizabeth II” of London England, Monarch of

the Parliament of the United Kingdom, can, does or ever did hold any Executive, Royal, Legal, Constitutional

and or any other right, entitlement or authority over the Australia & New Zealand sovereigns.

of 27

68: Apart from the Royal Styles and Titles Act 1973 being illegal (as it confers a “Royal Right” which no longer

exists at law), The Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia recognizes ONLY the “Queen of the

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland”.

69: The ‘Queen of Australia & New Zealand’ has no executive or other power within Australia & New Zealand

as this person is not recognized by the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia & New Zealand.

70: The Queen of the United Kingdom has no executive power within the UK, as she was, is and always will be

a Foreign Power in respect of the Commonwealth of Australia & New Zealand.

71: Executive power within the UK lies with the UK Parliament and not with the Monarch.

72: Unless specifically agreed to, and or asked for, by the Australia & New Zealand Sovereigns [De Jure]

through their elected representatives, no Executive power of the Parliament and or the Monarch of the United

Kingdom has any lawful control over the Sovereign [De Jure], but even more so is the case in respect of the

Sovereigns [De Jure] in Australia & New Zealand, who have at NO TIME have willingly acquiesced to ANY

Colonial or other British “Law” and at no time have been party to any treaty with the United Kingdom or

“Australia & New Zealand” governments indicating such.

73: The Monarch of the Parliament of the United Kingdom in her purported capacity as Queen of Australia &

New Zealand or any other alleged or purported capacity cannot confer any delegated executive powers to the

Governors-General of Australia & New Zealand, or Governors of the States, that she herself does not possess! ,

including:

73.1: Regal and or Vice-Regal authority for ANY person to act in the purported official capacity of:

73.1.1: the Governor General of the Commonwealth of Australia & New Zealand, and or;

73.1.2: the Governor of any of the States and or Territories of the Commonwealth of Australia & New

Zealand.

74: Halsburys Laws of England, Volume II, paragraphs 9 (11) to 9 (25) states, Quote:

“the Royal Sign Manual is a power of the United Kingdom Parliament under such various acts as the

Great Seal Act, the Crown Offices Act, the Clerk of the Crown and Chancery Act, and the Crown Seal

Offices Act etc.”

75: Therefore, NO appointments or commissions made by the “Queen of England” (who is recognized in the

Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia Act 1900 UK), or the “Queen of Australia” (who is not

recognized in the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia Act 1900 UK), that are not signed by senior

members of the UK Parliament are valid appointments as the monarch has not had the power to make

appointments of her own volition since 1690.

76: The last purportedly valid appointments made by a British Monarch were made by Queen Victoria who

died in 1901.

77: Under UK law, Royal appointments, authorities and commissions die with the Monarch.

78: There have never been any Royal Appointments, authorities or commissions made in accordance with

United Kingdom law since that time.

79: Therefore, all bills presented to the Australia & New Zealand parliaments since that time have never

received ‘Royal Assent’ as required in the Commonwealth Constitution, and therefore remain as Bills and have

never become laws.

80: Under Section 128 of the Australia Constitution, the Parliament of Australia had no power to appoint a new

Head of State in the guise of “Queen of Australia”. To do so is to claim sovereignty over the People of Australia

without the permission of the people of Australia.

81: No such permission was ever given. (See Australia Parliament House website, Referendum Results).

82: In a reply to a request made of the Australia Federal Attorney General by a Mr Ian Henke under the

Freedom of Information Act it was stated:

82.1: “I refer to your request to this department of 11 April 2001 pursuant to the Freedom of

Information Act 1982, for a copy of the document or documents by which the Sovereign people of

Australia, after the attainment of independence and Australian Sovereignty, confer or conferred

Executive Authority on the “Queen of Australia”, in particular the authority to appoint and empower,

under section 2 of the Constitution, a Governor-General to hold and exercise Executive Power under

section 61 of the Constitution. I am, pursuant to arrangements by the secretary of this department

under sub-section 23 (1) of the Act, authorized to make decisions on behalf of this department in

relation to this matter.” “I have accordingly reached the conclusion that no such document as

described by you exists.”

83: A second request for information made by Mr Henke to the Federal Attorney General under the Freedom

of Information Act, included a request for the following:

of 27

83.1: “The empowering documents or legislation issued by the United Kingdom Government or

Parliament empowering the Queen of Australia to use the Royal Prerogatives granted to the Queen of

the United Kingdom, in particular the Royal Sign Manual.”

84: In reply, under the hand of the Attorney General it was stated:

84.1: “I have reached the conclusion that no such document as described by you in your request,

exists.”

85: The Australian Parliaments:

85.1: did not get the power to appoint a Governor-General from the United

Kingdom, and,

85.2: did not get the power to appoint a Governor-General from the Australian

people.

86: Officers of Australia & New Zealand POLICE SERVICE” have sworn

allegiance to:

87.1: “the Government of the State of AUSTRALIA & NEW ZEALAND” and or,

87.2: “the Queen of Australia & New Zealand” (Queen Elizabeth II, of London).

88: By swearing such allegiance they have sworn allegiance to a power foreign to the Sovereign [De Jure] and

people of Australia & New Zealand.

89: Section 6 of the British “Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia Act 1900 (UK)” clearly declares to

the whole world that the British “Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia Act 1900 (UK)” refers to the

“States” in their PREVIOUS, and now untenable capacities as Colonies of the United Kingdom.

90: The following is the Oath of Allegiance sworn by ALL purported “Australia” Parliamentarians of both the

House and the Senate, as contained within the British

“Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia Act 1900 (UK)”.

91.1:

OATH I, A.B., do swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Victoria,

Her heirs and successors according to law. SO HELP ME GOD)

AFFIRMATION. I, A.B., do solemnly and sincerely affirm and declare that I will be faithful and bear

true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Victoria, Her heirs and successors according to law.

(NOTE. The name of the King or Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland for the

time being is to be substituted from time to time.)

92: The “Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia Act 1900 UK” was not amended prior to Australia

becoming an Independent Sovereign Nation Member State of the League of Nations (coinciding with the last

purported Monarch of Australia’s’ declaration of Australian Independence from the United Kingdom on the

10th January 1920) to reflect the acknowledgement of Indigenous Australia as part of the “number of the

people of the Commonwealth or of a State or other part of the Commonwealth” therefore:

92.1: Original Sovereign [De Jure] are not a party to, nor obligated under the “Act to Constitute the

Commonwealth of Australia 1900 UK” to comply with any:

92.1.1: Law,

92.1.2: Rule,

92.1.3: Regulation, or other obligation, any of which has the “Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of

Australia 1900 UK” as the basis of its’ authority.

93: Original Sovereigns [De Jure], are NOT:

93.1: part of any Australian & New Zealand or United Kingdom Colony (as defined in the “Act to

Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia 1900 UK”), nor,

93.2: a “possession of the Queen (of the United Kingdom)” (as defined by the “Act to Constitute the

Commonwealth of Australia 1900 UK”), nor,

93.3: subject to ANY purported or actual law or other legality enacted or otherwise given any power

either:

93.3.1: by the (United Kingdoms’) Queen's most Excellent Majesty, or,

93.3.2: by “Her heirs and or successors, or,

93.3.3: by and/or with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in

the United Kingdom Parliament.

94: Original Sovereigns [De Jure] are not, and never have been, lawfully subject to any authority or authorities

of ANY foreign power and or powers including the invading British Monarchy, and or their heirs and or

successors.

95: Original Sovereigns [De Jure] are not, and never have been, legally required to acknowledge, be

subservient to, or be in any way obliging to and or governed by and or subservient to either:

of 27

95.1: the Queen of the United Kingdom (whether Queen Victoria or Elizabeth II), nor,

95.2: ANY of their “heir and or successors”, whether as the Monarch of the Parliament of the United

Kingdom, or the purported monarch of the Commonwealth of Australia & New Zealand.

96: The reasons ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ demands the evidence of the seat of power and or authority

of Australia & New Zealand include, but are not limited to:

96.1: ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ has NO INTENTION of breaching ANY LAWFUL LAW, and,

96.2: ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ is now, in possession of substantial documented evidence

which clearly shows the “Corrective Services Act 2006, and all other Acts of the State, Territory and

Commonwealth are unenforceable due to legal problems in the legal effecting of these Acts due to

their authority coming from a power recognised by the High Court of Australia & New Zealand as

being a Foreign Power, and,

96.3: ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ is aware at all times, reliant upon the relying on her/his rights

pursuant to his/her Sovereign traditional, customary Original Lore, Tikanga, Maori Lore, Lawes, Law,

the common law and International Law in the absence of any lawful “Australian & New Zealand”

statute to the contrary.

96.4: ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ , fathers, grandfathers and great-grandfathers and respected

Elders in our Original Sovereign [De Jure] Tribal community, are aware that we have a social

obligation to instill in our children, by both deed and word, the necessity to obey lawful laws, and to

peaceably protest those which are oppressive, unjust, unlawful, unethical or immoral, including those

laws of a Foreign Power which are exercised in Gondwanna Land [Australia] and Aotearoa [New

Zealand], against the will of the Sovereign [De Jure] Original, but with the consent of the UK

Parliament, in direct contravention to all International law.

96.5: ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ is well respected in the Original Tribal International

Community and seeks the information demanded from AUSTRALIA & NEW ZEALAND [DE FACTO]

GOVERNMENTS in order to validate its purported authority over ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ an

‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ lands, so as to be sure that the laws of Australia & New Zealand,

acting under are, in fact, legitimate and lawful within Gondwanna Land [Australia] and Nui Tireni

[New Zealand] under the Paremata [Parliament] of Baludarri Rangihou.

97: At no point in time since nor before, first Proclaimed that Declaration of Independence with Australia

2013, AUSTRALIA, To Her Majesty The Queen, To Governor Generals in the Commonwealth World, has not

provided any evidence to disprove ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ protection under Paremata of Baludarri

Rangihou, claims to Social and Political rights under International and the Common Law, or any DOCUMENTED

EVIDENCE of either,

97.1: ANY of the alleged documented authority of which Australia & New Zealand, through senior

officers, has declared exists.

97.2: ANY of the alleged existent documented evidence of the Authority of the State and or

Commonwealth Constitutions.

98: ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ relies upon his Legitimate Expectation under International Law, that,

until such times as the agents, assigns, actors, officers and representatives of AUSTRALIA & NEW ZEALAND

have provided the evidence sought by ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ evidencing the authority of Australia &

New Zealand, its’ agents, assigns, actors, officers and representatives, that we have the right to legitimately

expect that the legal position, as ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ puts forth in this NOTICE OF JURISDICTION,

is true and correct.

99: ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ relies upon the fact that,

99.1: if ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ understanding of the Constitutional situation in Australia &

New Zealand – as detailed herein - is incorrect in Australia & New Zealand, its agents, assigns, actors,

officers and representatives have a Duty of Care Obligation to protect the Sovereign ‘Sovereign

Proponent [De Jure]’ .

100: For AUSTRALIA & NEW ZEALAND to fail to provide the requested documented evidence of the Head of

authority of Australia & New Zealand” to ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ , whilst patently, clearly knowing

‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ is waiting upon such information to be provided in order to make a

decision(s) (based upon such information if it could be provided) to comply with the laws of Australia & New

Zealand purport to be legitimate, and then after failing to provide such information, to summarily deprive

“‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ of his rights pursuant to International Law is both:

100.1: negligent, and

100.2: incompetent, and,

100.3: criminal, and,

of 27

100.4: illegal, and,

100.5: unlawful, and,

100.6: damaging to ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ .

101: Australia & New Zealand” owes a Duty of Care to ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ to provide the

evidence that Australia & New Zealand” relies upon to evidence its’ Head of authority etc. PRIOR to further

exercising its’ illegal statute and other laws and its’ absent jurisdiction against ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’

immediately.

102: ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ is now, in writing, verbally and by action, notifying Australia & New

Zealand Heads of Parliament and Commissioners of Police, that ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ has no

intention of breaching any reasonable LAWFUL Law.

100: ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ has no intention of recognizing nor complying with any law which

derives its’ authority from:

102.1: a foreign power, and or,

102.2: a foreign government, and or,

102.3: an illegal government.

103: ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ has every intention of defending her/his Human Rights, including those

as recognized under International Law.

104: ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ intends to,

104.1: comply with Common Law, and,

104.2: comply with legitimate statute law, and,

104.3: live peaceably with her/his fellow Sovereigns and Assembled Sovereigns [De Jure] of

Gondwanna Land [Australia] & Niu Tireni [New Zealand] 105: ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ , has never had, does not have, and cannot perceive a time when,

“‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ has, does or will willfully breach any law that can be evidenced to be lawful

and enforceable in respect of ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ pursuant to International Law (the same basis

upon which Australia & New Zealand as part of the “coalition of the willing” entered Iraq.

105: In the High Courts’ Teoh case the majority extended this principle to say that unincorporated treaties

could give rise to a legitimate expectation that decision makers would act in accordance with the Convention.

The following extracts indicate the approach that was adopted.

105.1: Mason CJ and Deane J said: 'ratification by Australia of an international Convention is not to be

dismissed as a merely platitudinous or ineffectual act, particularly when the instrument evidences

internationally accepted standards to be applied by courts and administrative authorities……………….

Rather, ratification of a Convention is a positive statement by the executive government of this

country to the world and to the Australia & New Zealand people that the executive government and its

agencies will act in accordance with the Convention. It is not necessary that a person seeking to set up

such a legitimate expectation should be aware of the Convention or should personally entertain the

expectation; it is enough that the expectation is reasonable in the sense that there are adequate

materials to support it.' This act has never been repealed.

106: SECT 6 of the British “Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia Act 1900 (UK)”, states:

106.1: 6. "The Commonwealth" shall mean the Commonwealth of Australia as established under this

Act. "The States" shall mean such of the colonies of New South Wales, New Zealand, Queensland,

Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia & New Zealand, and South Australia & New Zealand, including

the northern territory of South Australia & New Zealand, as for the time being are parts of the

Commonwealth, and such colonies or territories as may be admitted into or established by the

Commonwealth as States; and each of such parts of the Commonwealth shall be called "a State."

107: Section 80 of the Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia 1900 UK”states:

107.1: Trial by jury 80. The trial on indictment of any offence against any law of the Commonwealth

shall be by jury, and every such trial shall be held in the State where the offence was committed, and

if the offence was not committed within any State the trial shall be held at such place or places as the

Parliament prescribes.

108: Pursuant to the above facts ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ is not legally bound to acknowledge the

Australian & New Zealand Government” agent, assign, actors, officer or representative as having been

created pursuant to any legal authority or created upon any legal basis, unless and until the requested

documented evidence of such purported legal authority is provided and ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ has

been afforded an opportunity to validate or disprove such evidence.

109: Since 1835 and the increasing flow of colonials desiring to settle in these land, there has been two

nations, - two mindsets, living side by side. As with all Originees, the host tribes have been and are humble and

of 27

caring by nature, and hence are the guardians of the sanctity of life on their lands. Profits in commerce have

never been a primary factor in the original unadulterated, uncontaminated, genuine ways of the ‘Original’

culture. By contrast, the colonial migrants with a profit driven mind-set, generally were NOT and are NOT

connected to Source and hence just do NOT understand the purpose and value of life. Thus the colonial mind

set has and does treat money as GOD, to the detriment of honour, to the detriment of ecological life on these

lands, to the detriment of spiritual growth, to the detriment of ALL the incoming generations of the human

species.

110: 2013 The Rules Committee [Original Land Court] Paremata of Baludarri Rangihou ADOPTED for and to

protect the lands and any and all ‘Sovereign [De Jure]’

110.1 He Wakaputanga o te Rangatiratanga o Nu Tireni 1835 [Declaration of Independence 1835];

Agreed to unanimously via Special Resolution on this 19th

day of April 2013, in the presence of

Hereditary Tribal Chiefs Nambrimbrii; Terei Hape; Rewi Haukore and Turikatuku III Gumada & Others.

The Declaration of Independence 1835 has further been amended for the Original ‘Sovereign [De

Jure]’of Australia via Special Resolution as follows:

Article 1. We, the Hereditary Chiefs and Heads of the Tribes of Gondwanna Land [Australia], being

Assembled at and near Rangihou, Baludarri, Paremata NSW Australia on this 19th day of April 2013,

Declare the Independence of Our Sovereign [De Jure] Country, which is hereby Constituted and

Declared to be an Independent State, under the Designation of “Confederation of Chiefs of the United

Tribes of Gondwanna Land [Australia]”.

Article 2. All Sovereign [De Jure] Power and Authority within the (but not limited to) States,

Territories and Islands of Gondwanna Land [Australia], is hereby Declared to Reside Entirely and

Exclusively with the Original Sovereign [De Jure] Hereditary Chiefs and Heads of Tribes in their

Collective Capacity, who also Declare that they will “Not permit any Legislative Authority Separate

from themselves in their Collective Capacity to Exist”, nor “Any Function of Government to be

Exercised within the said States, Territories and Islands”, “Unless by [de facto] Persons Appointed by

them”, and “Acting under the Authority of Laws Regularly Enacted by them in Congress Assembled”.

Article 3. The Sovereign [De Jure] Hereditary Chiefs and Heads of Tribes Agree to Meet in Congress at

and near Rangihou Baludarri, Paremata NSW Australia on the 28th

day of October, each year, for “The

Purpose of Framing Laws for the Dispensation of Justice”, “The preservation of Peace and Good

Order”, and the “Regulation of Trade”, and they cordially invite all other Sovereign [De Jure] Tribes of

Gondwanna Land [Australia], to lay aside their private animosities and to consult the safety and

welfare of our Common Country, by joining the “Confederation of Chiefs of the United Tribes of

Gondwanna Land [Australia] & Niu Tireni [New Zealand] and others.

Article 4. They also agree to send a copy of this Declaration to ‘Her Majesty, the Queen of England;

Heirs; Successors”, to thank her for her acknowledgement of the “International Protectorate 1835 Niu

Tireni [New Zealand] National United Tribes Flag”; and in Return for the Friendship and Protection

they have shown, are prepared to show, to such of “Her Subjects as have Settled in their Country

Gondwanna Land [Australia] & Niu Tireni [New Zealand] ”, or “Resorted to its shores for the Purposes

of Trade”, they entreat that “She will Continue to be the Parent of their Infant State, Territories and

Islands”, and that “She will become its Protector from All Attempts upon its Independence”.


protect the lands and any and all ‘Sovereign [De Jure]’

111.1 He Te Tiriti O Waitangi 1840 (Treaty of Waitangi, Maori Version); Te Ture Whenua Maori, Maori

Land Act 1993; Agreed to unanimously via Special Resolution on this 19th

day of April 2013, in the

presence of Hereditary Tribal Chiefs Nambrimbrii; Terei Hape; Rewi Haukore and Turikatuku III

Gumada & Others. The Declaration of Independence 1835 has further been amended for the Original

‘Sovereign [De Jure]’of Australia via Special Resolution as follows:

112: 2013 The Rules Committee [Original Land Court] Paremata of Baludarri Rangihou reminded Queen

Elizabeth in a letter dated 12th

September 2013, of her Oath: Let it be known that Her Majesty’s

representatives are inarguably bound by Oath to the Most High Source of Creation to honor, respect and

defend that ‘New Zealand National United Tribes Flag 1835’ and the people of Aotearoa, encompassing all

tribes and cultures in the Pacific Ocean, including the ‘Originals of Australia’. Notification in the London and

Australian Government Gazette.


protect the Land, namely; Notification in the London and Australian Government Gazette.

(i) Charter of the United Nations and Statute of the International Court of Justice 1845; and

(ii) Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948; and

of 27


(iv) International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1976; and

(v) The Declaration on the Rights of the Indigenous Peoples 1994-2007; and

(vi) The International Bill of Human Rights 1948; and

(vii) General Assembly resolution 1803 (XVII) of 14 December 1962, "Permanent sovereignty over

natural resources" and

(viii) Charter of the United Nations and

(ix) International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights 1976 and

(x) International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1976 and

(xi) Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1976 with special

attention to THE CORE INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTRUMENTS and their monitoring

bodies.


protect the Land, the Letters Patent and have the full rights and powers of letters Patent. Notification in the

London and Australian Government Gazette.

114: 2013 The Rules Committee [Original Land Court] Paremata of Baludarri Rangihou ADOPTED Crown

Protectorates and Common Law Doctrine: Magna Carta, Section 39; Halsbury’s Statutes 3rd edition, Volume 36

- Statutes, paragraph 559 page 337 paragraph 12, 12(1); Standing Orders; New Zealand Constitution Act

(United Kingdom) 1846 section 10; 1846 Royal Charter and Instructions, chapter xiv; and the Pacific Islanders

Protection Act 1872 & 1875 (38 &39 Vict. c. 51.). Notification in the London New Zealand and Australian

Government Gazette/s.

115: 2013 The Rules Committee [Original Land Court] Paremata of Baludarri Rangihou stated that the laws,

customs and usages of the Original Sovereigns, so far as they are not repugnant to the general principals of

Humanity, shall be maintained for the Government of themselves, in all their relations to, and dealings with

each other, and that particular territories shall be set apart within and by such Laws, Customs and Usages, to

fulfill the aspirations, prosperity and well-being by virtue of the Land, that the Original Sovereigns freely

determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development, and in so

doing, strive for the goodness of humanity to eliminate famine, disease and suffering to all people and to rid

war and violence to such territories to embrace all of mankind with the dignity and spirit of God’s grace.

116: 2013 Sovereign Chief Justice of The Rules Committee [Original Land Court] Paremata of Baludarri

Rangihou Australia & New Zealand informed Her Majesty The Queen, all Governor Generals of the

Commonwealth of the World, on the 13th

September, 2013 of the intend to commence proceedings as an

Original Land Court and Parliament of Baludarri Rangihou.

PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE FACTS:

“Sovereign Proponent” DEMANDS:

1: That the matters concerning ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ be held Sine Die (including all

correspondence, Judgments, orders and or actions) until the purported Parliament of Australia satisfies

“Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]” valid concerns regarding the:

1.1: Source of power, and,

1.2: Head of power, and,

1.3: Authority of the AUSTRALIA and NEW ZEALAND over ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ .

2: That, in relation to ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ , before ANY further legal action is commenced and or

continued by the purported Parliament of Australia and New Zealand, provide to ‘Sovereign Proponent [De

Jure]’ those documents which are required and necessary to prove the claim to jurisdiction over ‘Sovereign

Proponent [De Jure]’ , including:

2.1: Letters Patent establishing the “Office of Governor – General for the United Kingdom of Great

Britain and Irelands’ Colony of The Commonwealth of Australia and New Zealand” under the Royal

Sign Manual and Royal Signet, sealed with the Great Seal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and

Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, recorded and filled in the office of Chancery of the Lord

High Chancellor, in the High Court of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and

Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, located at Westminster, London England.

2.2: Letters Patent establishing the “Colonies of AUSTRALIA” under the Royal Sign Manual and Royal

Signet, sealed with the Great Seal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions

thereto, recorded and filled in the office of Chancery of the Lord High Chancellor, in the High Court of

the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto

of 27

2.3: Letters Patent establishing the “Office of Governor for the United Kingdom of Great Britain and

Ireland’s Colonies of AUSTRALIA” under the Royal Sign Manual and Royal Signet, sealed with the

Great Seal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging,

recorded and filled in the office of Chancery of the Lord High Chancellor, in the High Court of the

Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging,

located at Westminster, London England.

2.4: The Writ of Commission for the “Governor General of The UK Colony of the Commonwealth of

Australia and New Zealand” under the Royal Sign Manual and Royal Signet, sealed with the Great

Seal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, recorded

and filled in the office of Chancery of the Lord High Chancellor, in the High Court of the Parliament of

the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, located at

Westminster, London England.

2.5: The Writ of Commission for the “Governor of The UK Colony of AUSTRALIA”, under the Royal





2.6: The Writ of Commission for the “Chief Justice of the UK Colony of The Commonwealth of

Australia and New Zealand”, under the Royal Sign Manual and Royal Signet, sealed with the Great

Seal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, recorded

and filled in the office of Chancery of the Lord High Chancellor, in the High Court of the Parliament of

the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, located at

Westminster, London England.

2.7: The Writ of Commission for the “Chief Justice of The UK Colony of AUSTRALIA”, under the Royal





2.8: The Writ of Commission for the Police Commissioner of the “UK Colony of AUSTRALIA” under

the Royal Sign Manual and Royal Signet, sealed with the Great Seal of the United Kingdom of Great

Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, recorded and filled in the office of Chancery of

the Lord High Chancellor, in the High Court of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain

and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, located at Westminster, London England.

2.10: The Writ of Commission for the “Minister of The Crown, known as the Attorney General” of

The UK Commonwealth of Australia”, under the Royal Sign Manual and Royal Signet, sealed with the

Great Seal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging,

recorded and filled in the office of Chancery of the Lord High Chancellor, in the High Court of the

Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging,

located at Westminster, London England.

2.11: The Writ of Commission for the “Senior Registrar of the Magistrates Court of The UK Colony of

AUSTRALIA”, under the Royal Sign Manual and Royal Signet, sealed with the Great Seal of the United

Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, recorded and filled in the

office of Chancery of the Lord High Chancellor, in the High Court of the Parliament of the United

Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, located at Westminster,

London

2.12: All documents you personally, and individually, rely on to establish your “head of Power” under

the Royal Sign Manual and Royal Signet, sealed with the Great Seal of the United Kingdom of Great

Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, recorded and filed in the office of Chancery of

the Lord High Chancellor, in the High Court of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain

and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, located at Westminster, London

2.13: All documents you personally, and individually rely on to establish “your claimed Authority”

under the Royal Sign Manual and Royal Signet, sealed with the Great Seal of the United Kingdom of

Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, recorded and filed in the office of

Chancery of the Lord High Chancellor, in the High Court of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of

Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, located at Westminster, London

2.14: All documents you personally, and individually rely on to establish your claimed “Jurisdiction”

under the Royal Sign Manual and Royal Signet, sealed with the Great Seal of the United Kingdom of

of 27

Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, recorded and filled in the office of

Chancery of the Lord High Chancellor, in the High Court of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of

Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, located at Westminster, London

2.15: A clear printed text of the oath sworn by any Judicial officer who hears and or proposes to hear

any matter in relation to ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ , matter.

2.16: A current, legally binding, valid and legitimate Constitution; written and approved BY ALL the

individual Independent Sovereign [De Jure] People of the independent entity Member State of the

United Nations, Internationally recognized as “The Commonwealth of Australia”: expressing their

freely given will of SELF- DETERMINATION under a Referendum (Plebiscite) conducted with the

Authorised blessing of the International Community and International law; stating the source of that

AUTHORITY, the date of APPROVAL and REGISTRATION with The Secretariat of The United Nations

which shows acquiescence by the Australian people to any Domestic British legislation.”.

2.17: A current, legally binding, valid and legitimate Constitution; written and approved BY ALL the

individual Independent Sovereign People in the “STATE of AUSTRALIA” evidencing their freely

expressed will of SELF- DETERMINATION to be subject to ANY “government”, “law”, “court”, “judge”,

“magistrate”, “justice of the peace”, “police officer”, “prison officer”, “officer of the court”, “clerk of

the court”, agents”, or ANY other thing or person which is subaltern to the Parliament of the United

Kingdom, proven by a Referendum (Plebiscite) conducted with the AUTHORISED blessing of the

International Community and International law; stating the source of that AUTHORITY, the date of

APPROVAL and REGISTRATION with The Secretariat of The United Nations.

2.18: The Document whereby ALL the Individual Independent Sovereign People of the

Commonwealth of Australia requested Queen Elizabeth the second, on the Throne, (re-established by

ALL Sessions I & II William and Mary 1688), in The High Court of The Regent’s Parliament of The

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, to represent them as

their Sovereign.

2.19: Either:

2.19.1:A current legal and binding Treaty, dated BEFORE the 10th of January 1920, between

the Aboriginal Nations of Australia and the Parliament of the United Kingdom of England and

Ireland, under the Royal Sign Manual and Royal Signet, sealed with the Great Seal of the

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, recorded and

filled in the office of Chancery of the Lord High Chancellor, in the High Court of the

Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto

belonging, located at Westminster, London, which Treaty evidences the acquiescence to

British Colonial or other Law by the Independent, Sovereign, Indigenous Nations and Peoples

of Australia, or,

2.19.2:A current legal and binding Treaty, dated AFTER the 10th of January 1920, between

the Aboriginal Nations of Australia and the Colonial Government of Australia and or the

Governments of the States of the Commonwealth of Australia, which Treaty evidences the

acquiescence to Australian Statutory law and or British Colonial and or other law by the

Independent, Sovereign, Indigenous Nations and Peoples of Australia.

3: Should Australia” not be able to produce all the above required and purportedly existent and purportedly

“available” EVIDENCE OF THE PURPORTED AUTHORITY of Australia & New Zealand and or the court or courts

it is proposed will hear these matters, to Chief Justice Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ COMPLETE

SATISFACTION by the Monday 30th

September 2013, Chief Justice Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ demands

that Australia” provide Certified Documentation evidencing:

3.1: Written permission from the United Nations to use Foreign Law, including British Domestic Law,

in contravention of Article 2: paragraphs 1 and 4 of the United Nations Charter of 1945;

3.2: Written permission from the League of Nations to use Foreign Law in the Commonwealth of

Australia in direct contravention of Articles I, X and XX of the League of Nations Covenant of 1919.

3.3: Permissions, in writing, from The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland Parliament to

continue to use United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland Law in the Independent Sovereign Nation

State of The Commonwealth of Australia, Assented to, and Duly Signed and Sealed, under The Great

Seal of The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, by King George the Fifth, and Counter-Signed

by The Lord High Chancellor of The High Court of Parliament of The United Kingdom of Great Britain

and Ireland; and

3.3.1: including an Authentic, Certified Copy of Documentation evidencing the Registration of

same by The Office of the Clerk of The Crown in Chancery of The High Court of The

of 27

Parliament of The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland at Westminster, prior to

January 10, 1920.

4: Clear written evidence of the freely expressed permission by ALL the Individual Independent Sovereigns [De

Jure] of The Commonwealth of Australia and New Zealand, for the continued use of Foreign Colonial Law,

within:

4.1: The Commonwealth of Australia [which includes New Zealand], and,

4.2: the State of AUSTRALIA, and,

4.3: within the Boundary of the land area within the continent of Australia, after January 10, 1920;

(when clearly ALL FOREIGN LAW (Colonial, Imperial or otherwise) was deemed to be ABROGATED and

ultravirus with respect of Australia at International Law under the TERMS AND CONDITIONS of

Membership to the League of Nations, under The Covenant of The League of Nations Covenant 1919,

Upon the several Independent Nations Entity States signing The Covenant at the Peace Conference at

Versailles.

4.3.1: Both The Commonwealth of Australia and The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland

were ORIGINAL Independent Signatory Nation Member States.

5: Clear written Certified evidence of Full General Assembly of The United Nations’ Revocation of its Resolution

2625 (XXV) of October 24, 1970 Declaring ALL British Acts (both Colonial and Imperial) as legal and binding on

the Individual, Independent Sovereign [De Jure] of Australia.

6: Evidence that;

6.1: All Constitutions (including Australian 1900 UK & WA, SA, Vic, Tas, NSW and Queensland).

6.2: The Statute of Westminster 1931,

6.3: Statute of Westminster Adoption Act 1942, and,

6.4: The Australian Acts (UK and CTA), are not NULL AND VOID in respect of the Commonwealth of

Australia.

7: Full written Certified evidence of WHY the British Colony of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act

1900 UK of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of England and Ireland, assented by the Regent on the

Throne in the High Court of THAT Parliament at Westminster, being a FOREIGN ACT OF A FOREIGN NATION, IS

NOT registered at the United Nations in Geneva nor New York, as a RECIPROCAL MUTUAL TREATY which is

required under international Law before it (as a Foreign Law) can be exercised within the land of the

Commonwealth of Australia and New Zealand.

8: That any other “court” other than the purported High Court of Australia, so as to facilitate this matter being

determined by the only purported “Australian” court which is purportedly authorised to hear challenges to the

purported “Australian Constitution” and or defenses taken pursuant to International Treaties, pursuant to

Section 80 of the “Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia Act 1900 UK” , set this matter aside for

hearing by the purported High Court of Australia, which, pursuant to the particulars of this NOTICE OF

JURISDICTION, is the ONLY purported “court” in Australia which might purportedly possibly have the

purported authority to hear this matter under “Australia’s” purported “Constitution” (i.e.: the “Act to

Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia Act 1900 UK”).

9: That the purported Parliament of Australia, its’ agents, assigns, actors, officers and representatives accept,

acknowledge and comply with ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ rights as an Original Tribal Sovereign [De Jure]

on Gondwanna Land (Australia) and Niu Tireni (Aotearoa / New Zealand).

10: That the purported Parliament of Australia, its’ agents, assigns, officers and representatives accept,

acknowledge and comply with ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ and do not interfere with the rights of

‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ to exercise His/Her Sovereign rights within and upon her/his Sovereign land,

Gondwanna Land (Australia) and Niu Tireni (Aotearoa / New Zealand).

PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE FACTS AND DEMANDS:

TAKE NOTICE that if you fail to produce the required documented evidence of the purported authority of

Australia” by the Monday 30th

September 2013 and or fail to comply with the aforesaid Demands OR

demonstrate a proper DEFENCE against ALL the FACTS upon which this NOTICE OF JURISDICTION is founded,

then it shall be taken that Australia & New Zealand [De Facto] Governments” ADMITS:

1: THAT the facts as stated in this NOTICE OF JURISDICTION are true and correct AND,

2: THAT the demands arising from those facts are proper and reasonable AND,

3: THAT the Demands of this NOTICE OF JURISDICTION must be complied with AND,

4: THAT ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ is entitled to costs and damages for any breach of ‘Sovereign

Proponent [De Jure]’ rights as stated herein as afforded by the Terms and Conditions and Fees Schedule A

of 27

forwarded to the Attorney General, The Office of the Premier , Comissioner of Police of the AUSTRALIA and

NEW ZEALAND.

5: THAT any public or private harassment and intimidation of any and all ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ and

his/her family and community by officers Australia” its’ agents, assigns, actors, officers and or representatives

under direction of the Queen of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of England and Ireland in her illegal

purported capacity of the “Queen of Australia” are remedial by way of an action determinable by the

Sovereign [De Jure], Chief Justice, Assemble Owners of the Rules Committee [Original Land Court] Paremata

of Baludarri Rangihou.

6: THAT it understands, and accepts that actions against those officers referred to in paragraph 5 (immediately

above) would be taken against those officers personally.

7: THAT it has no authority at law to use any law which has its’ head of authority in either the;

7.1: Parliament of the United Kingdom, and or,

7.2: the Monarch of the Parliament of the United Kingdom, and or,

7.3: Parliaments of THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA and NEW ZEALAND or any state and or

territory thereof, and or,

7.4: the Queen of the Parliament of the United Kingdom in her purported and illegal capacity as the

“queen of Australia”.

DECLARATION OF UNDERSTANDING

Therefore be it now known to any and all concerned and affected parties, that ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’

is a Sovereign on the land standing in Gods Kingdom.

1: ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ does hereby clearly specifically and unequivocally that her/his intent to

peacefully and lawfully live her/his life as she/he so chooses and pursue whatever livelihood without being

molested while on journey in her/her private car(s), truck(s), or any other moving unit without any license

and/or registration - free of all statutory obligations and restrictions while maintaining all rights at law to

trade, exchange or barter .

2: ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ shall use as True Certified Identification a ‘Sovereign [De Jure] Live Record

of Birth’ to show that they are Sovereign [De Jure] and belong to ‘Gods Kingdom’ under the protection of The

Original Land Court and Paremata [Parliament] of Baludarri Rangihou.

3: ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ shall use a

and Immunity Card’ to show that he/she is a

protection of The Original Land Court and Paremata [Parliament] of Baludarri Rangihou.

4: ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ shall use an identification plate to show

with ‘Gods Kingdom’ printed on it.

5: ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ shall display, at all times

1835’ on all four corners of the automobile

carried on them at all times, to show

rather than conflict. His/her intent is to maintain the peace

controversy is in INTERNATIONAL dishonor

4: Four white flags signify TRUCE. Any

issue a violation ticket to a ‘Sovereign [De Jure]’

Protectorates and is in INTERNATIONAL dishonor.

5: ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ shall

Gods Kingdom without interruption or harassment as a

Nui Tireni [New Zealand]

6: ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ reserves the ri

sustenance, protection or recreation without any license or registration.

of 27

shall use as True Certified Identification a ‘Sovereign [De Jure] Identification

he/she is a Sovereign [De Jure] and belongs to ‘Gods Kingdom’ under the

Court and Paremata [Parliament] of Baludarri Rangihou.

shall use an identification plate to show that their vehicle is privately owned

shall display, at all times four flags ‘New Zealand National United Tribes Flag

on all four corners of the automobile, in the front window of their house, at their place of business and

to show that his/her intent is to avoid conflict and that he/she

intent is to maintain the peace, therefore anyone who creates a conflict or

dishonor.

Four white flags signify TRUCE. Any Police Officer that stops him/her and attempts to raise a controversy or

‘Sovereign [De Jure]’, is breaking the law and breaching International Crown

Protectorates and is in INTERNATIONAL dishonor.

shall travel freely and in peace to where ever he/she choose

Gods Kingdom without interruption or harassment as a ‘Sovereign [De Jure]’ on Gondwanna Land [Australia] &

reserves the right to own and carry a gun for the purpose of hunting for

sustenance, protection or recreation without any license or registration.

s True Certified Identification a ‘Sovereign [De Jure] Identification

Gods Kingdom’ under the

is privately owned

‘New Zealand National United Tribes Flag

in the front window of their house, at their place of business and

wishes dialogue

anyone who creates a conflict or

and attempts to raise a controversy or

ternational Crown

chooses, throughout

Gondwanna Land [Australia] &

gun for the purpose of hunting for

of 27

7: ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ claims all transactions of security interests require the consent of both

parties and I do hereby deny consent to any transaction of a security interest issuing under any Act for as

herein stated as a ‘Sovereign [De Jure]’ standing in Gods Kingdom I am not subject to any Act.

8: ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ claims his/her creator has gifted him/her with a mind and the ability to

speak and hear and therefore he/she intends that he/she have the right of freedom of speech and freedom of

thought and freedom of expression and freedom to hear other of his/her creations with no restriction and no

limitations apart from Honoring He who created him/her.

9: ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ claims his/her creator has gifted him/her with two strong legs and a mind

that can navigate and therefore he/she intends that he/she have the right of freedom of travel across that

portion of his/her creation known as the Planet Earth with no restriction and no limitations apart from

Honoring he/she who created him/her. ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure] will produce the Live Birth Record as

proof of identity for all purposes of Travel.

10: ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ claims his/her creator has gifted him/her with consciousness, life, two

strong arms and a mind that can use these arms with power and precision and therefore he/she intends that

he/she have the right to defend from harm or aggression myself and those he/she places in my care with no

restriction and no limitations apart from Honoring he/she who created him/her.

11: ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ claims that he/she may not be compelled to perform under any contract

or commercial agreement that he/she did not enter knowingly, voluntarily and intentionally, without full

disclosure and fixed terms and conditions atop his/her signature knowingly and consciously made by his/her

hand.

12: ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ claims that he/she does not accept the liability of the compelled benefit of

any unrevealed contract or commercial agreement which are my rights pursuant to common law.

13: ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’ claims the right to deal with any disputes publicly and in an open forum

using discussion and negotiation and to capture as electronic video and sound said discussion and negotiation

for whatever lawful purpose as I see fit.

Take due notice.

Without Prejudice

Principal Representative of ‘Sovereign Proponent [De Jure]’

PUBLIC REFERENCE

INTRODUCTION TO EXODUS http://wp.me/P3V3Wk-1

of 27

TERMS & CONDITIONS REFERENCE NUMBER: A0015678

RESPONDENT: Prime Minister of Australia – Tony Abbott

Prime Minister of New Zealand – John Key

Commission of Police NZ – Peter Marshall

Commissioner of Police Australia - Andrew Scipione APM

PROPONENT: Any and All Sovereign [De Jure]

Paremata of Baludarri Rangihou

c/o Post Office Box 9144, Harris Park NSW 2150 Australia & New Zealand

Parties:

These Terms & Conditions are applicable to the above named parties, also including but not limited to colleagues acting for

or on behalf of the named parties:

Applicability

Whereas any and all Sovereign [De Jure] is a Sovereign of the Land, Respondent therefore acts in the capacity of a private

individual against a Soveriegn [De Jure].

In the absence of government statutes and other corporate contracts, the only instrument that will compel performance

between private individuals is a lawfully binding contract.

Respondent’s Responsibilities

It is Respondent’s onus and responsibility to provide proof of claim in the form of a Sufficient Verified Response of a

lawfully binding contract, presumed or claimed to exist between the parties. Additionally any claimed contract must

possess all elements of a lawfully binding contract including but not limited to; offer, acceptance, true reliant statements of

fact, intent and consideration, and that these elements have been knowingly, willing and intentionally disclosed to

Proponent.

Absent a lawfully binding contract, this document notices terms and conditions between the parties which upon

acceptance will form a lawfully binding contract between the parties.

It is Respondents responsibility to inform and advise any colleagues acting for or on behalf of Respondent of these terms

and conditions.

See Schedule A for contractual obligations arising from acceptance of these terms.

Sufficient Verified Response

Owing to the seriousness of the matter, only a response that meets the following criteria qualifies as a Sufficient Verified

Response. Response must:

1. be duly registered verified and sworn documentation of standing, authority, value, and rebuttal of every point with

specificity and particularity;

2. exhibit written delegation of authority signed by the Respondent if response is by another;

3. use words defined within common dictionaries (e.g. Webster's or Oxford).

No correspondence will be entered into by telephone.

Method of Rejection

No contract shall be considered entered where Respondent does not do or perform any of the actions listed in Schedule A.

No action, No contract.

Method of Acceptance

A lawfully binding contract is knowingly entered into by Respondent or any of their agents doing or performing any of the

actions listed in Schedule A. Action is Acceptance.

Terms of Acceptance

Acceptance is with Respondent’s consent to the following:

1. Agreement with all terms and conditions stipulated herein;

2. Unreserved acceptance of charges payable stipulated in Schedule A;

3. Respondent irrevocably and unconditionally waives any and all rights of objection, immunities or defenses.

of 27

SCHEDULE A Currency: Australia Dollars

Collection fees: Collection fees for any unpaid invoices are additional.

Item Charges Description *Rate

(Dollars)

1 Any claim absent a lawfully binding contract between the parties, the penalty will be TEN

THOUSDAND DOLLARS ($10,000) per hour or any portion thereof

$10,000

2 Enforcing or attempting to enforce any prior issued instrument on a ‘Sovereign [De Jure]’, the

penalty will be TEN THOUSDAND DOLLARS ($10,000) per hour or any portion thereof

$10,000

3 Unlawful repairable Damage or Destruction to the Proponent’s private property or goods

instigated by or caused by the Respondent, the penalty will be TEN THOUSDAND DOLLARS

($10,000) per occurrence or any portion thereof

$10,000

4 Each telephone call made by Respondent in the pursuit of any claim absent a lawfully binding

contract between the parties, the penalty will be TEN THOUSDAND DOLLARS ($10,000) per

hour or any portion thereof

$10,000

5 Detention for questioning, interrogation, detained in any way, harassed or otherwise

regulated, the penalty will be TEN THOUSDAND DOLLARS ($10,000) per hour or any portion

thereof

$10,000

6 Restrained, handcuffed, transported, incarcerated or subjected to any adjudication process

ignoring our Inherent Rights, the penalty will be (TEN THOUSAND DOLLARS ($10,000) per

hour or portion thereof

$10,000

7 Subjected to undue force or afflicted by and suffer the effects of any “non-lethal” weapon

such as a Taser, the penalty will be TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($200,000) per

occurrence

$200,000

8 Forced to suffer the effects of the use of any lethal weapon, fists, boots or any other method

of torture to the body, the penalty will be TWO MILLION DOLLARS ($2,000,000,000) per

occurrence

$2,000,000

9 KIDNAPPING and/or DEATH due to the use of lethal force by ANYONE, intentional or

accidental, acting under the color of law or otherwise, the penalty will be TEN BILLION

DOLLARS ($10,000,000,000) to be paid to the surviving Heirs and Successors

$10,000,000,000

10 Forcefully compelled to undergo any ingestion of energies or substances into or onto the

body whether under the guise of medication or otherwise, without my express written

consent, the penalty will be TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($200,000) per occurrence

$200,000

11 False statements of any crime or infraction or mis-quoted, or attributed anything we did not

actually speak, write or do, or our written or spoken communications are shown to be

tampered with in any way, the penalty will be ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000) per

occurrence

$1,000,000

12 Unlawful entry or Trespass on Proponent’s private property or goods, the penalty will be

ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000) per occurrence

$1,000,000

13 Operating or perpetuating any and all private money systems, issuing, collection, legal

enforcement systems, operating SLAVERY SYSTEMS of and against the Sovereign Proponent,

the penalty will be ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000) per occurrence

$1,000,000

Note: Units of increment will determine number of incidences invoiced. Changes to Terms and Conditions: Terms and conditions may change at any time. Respondent

will be offered new terms that will supersede and cancel any previously issued terms and conditions.

of 27

WE ARE NOT YOUR PROPERTY, WE ARE FREE AND

SOVEREIGN AND WE HAVE ANOTHER QUEEN!

Sovereignty is for all those anywhere on this Earth who want to formally and finally Declare their sovereignty

as coming forth from their Creator, wanting to be a part of a Higher Purpose, seeking Peace and wanting a

‘Heaven on Earth’ by being a part of a Particular Separate Body Politic with Standing and Diplomatic Immunity

sojourning outside the de-facto corporate military entities of man’s creation/government immersed in control,

fraud, war, death, destruction and bankruptcy.

When entering into sovereignty, no state shall impair the obligation of contract and pursuant to your right via

The Declaration of Independence 1835 NZ [Te Wakaputanga 1835] by assumption and presumption and/or

otherwise and such entering into this association, One must recognize the One True Creator of the Universe,

his Kingdom, his Son and his jurisdiction, being above all others being supreme and de-jure.

“Some people are born to be tied down – some people are born to be free ...” And as you may know, many

have longed for their sovereignty! Since 1776 from the supposed intent of the formation of this country, by

the agents of Britain and since the implementation of their agendas which has either merged with or is merely

a camouflaged ‘program’, has resulted in a socialized democracy, still under British control and a program of

mere subjection and servitude.

But the students of history already know that in 1861, Abraham Lincoln imposed Martial Law, which remains in

force today and the bankruptcy of 1933 continued the program of subjugation of the Original People to a

lesser class of debtor/slaves ruled by a corporate de-facto government of and by the elite and openly denying

the people their guaranteed right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness!

If a ‘divided house cannot stand’, then this country was doomed from the beginning, as its ‘political institutions’

as created, is a duplication of that of England. And the so-called ‘law-making’ branches being divided; Senate

and House of Representatives divides the HOUSE into bickering, fighting, lobbying, graft, absolute corruption,

fraud and a continued program for over 220 years of braking down the ‘Australia and New Zealand Dream’…a

supposed land of the Free and Home of the Brave where the God-given Rights has been replaced with a

socialized democracy, compelled licenses and permits (since the declaration of the National Emergency-1933),

‘USE’ taxes on all that you think you own whereby you have been converted into a mere economic slave, a

resource solely to keep the government corporations functioning as the higher life force that demands

obedience!

All of your ‘property’ has been pledged to support the States and therefore the National government

operating under the disability of the ‘national emergency.’ The Federal government has become the BEAST-

MASTER and the States are mere ‘federal units’ and their ‘foreign courts’ are no longer ‘Constitutional Courts

of Due Process,’ as due process went out the window with the bankruptcy. Councils are ‘agencies’ of the same

de-facto States and municipalities and all other ‘corporations’ are controlled creatures of the State. BABYLON

is alive and well and it’s the CORPORATE–USA–FEDERAL DE-FACTO MILITARY GOVERNMENT!

BUT NOW YOU HAVE an opportunity to exercise your political choice, a free-will decision and maybe once and

for all to ‘Come out of Babylon’! (Before it’s too late!). Otherwise, you may remain the subject and object of

corporate de-facto government being debtor/slaves and used as their revenue base, never owning property,

possessing title(s), or… really being free!

At this time period in our countries history, we’re being told that the U.S. Military is over in Iraq fighting for our

freedom! Many think we need another revolution over here or maybe there are those who now recognize the

‘programming’ and are ready to move on or rather who are ready to move-up, stepping-up and/or emerging

into something better as it so states in the internationally recognised The Declaration of Independence 1835

NZ [Te Wakaputanga 1835], which it seems that our current government ‘leaders’ have not only ignored for

years but have withheld and denied the concept from the people for such an evolution! But why would One

expect the ‘controllers’ to do that?

of 27

So the question might be; “Just how long must the people remain in bondage before a deliverer might come to

free them, if ‘them’ people find themselves being Original!”

We already have a record of a people being placed in bondage for over 200 years, were freed and within a very

short period of time created another form of bondage of which their progeny yet remains! HOWEVER; The

Australia & New Zealand and New Zealand courts have declared that the ‘Original people’ are the sovereign

authority but that principle has also been ignored and denied the people so as to control and use them for the

benefit of the ‘powers that be’ and their government-corporations and the people have been dumbed down

so as not to fully understand their God given rights, their power as one, as twelve or as the whole.

And it is well understood that government, who has become the MASTER/BEAST will NOT correct the fraud

and wrongs of the past or to bestow upon the people the means, the concepts or whatever to not only for you

to regain your rights and property but to really live free outside of and not under the control of the de-facto

police-state sub-corporations as well. THEREFORE; You have a right to evaluate the EXODUS PLAN, to make a

political choice, a free will decision that deals with and affects you and your sovereignty.

In your hands is the information and introduction to the EXODUS 'Sovereignty Program' for people everywhere

who want to experience sovereignty from any where on the Planet. This 'Sovereignty Program' allows you to

do that, to evolve or move up (upgrade) to another level, to do what you have a right to do, irrespective of

your so-called government 'construct'. But be fore-warned; these ‘de-facto military government constructs’

may continue to harass, to intimidate, to violate… only until enough sovereign people come forward within the

association/body to become a new voice in the wilderness to shouting; WE ARE NOT YOUR PROPERTY, WE ARE

FREE AND SOVEREIGN [DE JURE] AND WE HAVE ANOTHER QUEEN!

A decision to become sovereign or if not, you may, as it is your right to remain a bond-servant/debtor-slave to

the corrupt governments of man, but that decision must not be taken lightly. Just understand that you have

the right to make that decision and you may not have a lot of time, however ... the rest is up to you!

---- Christian 699/70NZ

courtesy notice from a ‘sovereign [de jure]’ · pdf filepage 1 of 27 courtesy...

Documents