cp violation brazilian physical society particles and fields meeting caxambu, 10-14 august 1998
DESCRIPTION
CP Violation Brazilian Physical Society Particles and Fields Meeting Caxambu, 10-14 August 1998 Tatsuya Nakada CERN * Geneva, Switzerland * On leave from Paul Scherrer Institute. I) Why CP violation is highly interesting? - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
CP ViolationBrazilian Physical Society
Particles and Fields MeetingCaxambu, 10-14 August 1998
Tatsuya NakadaCERN
Geneva, Switzerland
On leave from Paul Scherrer Institute
I) Why CP violation is highly interesting?
- Currently observed CP violation in the kaon decays can be accommodated within the Standard Model.BUT, it cannot exclude that CP violation is partly or evenentirely due to new physics.
- Since CP violation is due to an “interference”, it is sensitiveto a small effect.
- Cosmology (baryon genesis) suggests that an additional source of CP violation other than the Standard Model is needed.
A promising place to look for new Physics
K t=00 → K t=t1
0 ≠K t=00 → Kt=t1
0
Observed CP violation in the kaon system:
CP and T
so called CP violation in K0- K0 oscillations
1) Re 2π =2π Hw KL
2π Hw KS
II) CP violation in the Kaon system
CP = 1 CP 1
CP 1
So called CP violation in the interplay between oscillations and decays
2) Im
K0t=0
K0
K02t=t1
K0t=0
K0
K02t=t1
3) Current experimental results are = 00
arg = tan1 m/ (m = mL mS, = S L )
NA31,CPLEAR (CERN)E731, E773 (FNAL)
This is compatible with Standard Modelbut also with
Superweak Model
4) Experimental attempt to exclude the Superweak model1) To show
|| |00|so called Re(/) 0
or CP violation in decay:due to penguins
NA48 (CERN), KTeV(FNAL)
2) To showBr(KL 0) 1011
Being discussed at FNAL and BNL
Standard model predictions are uncertain for and 00
hadronic effects: long range interactionspenguins etc.
Br(KL 0) is experimentally really hard.
Another place to look for CP violation?
If there is nothing else but the standard model, |Vcb|, |Vub| B-meson decaysmd Bd-Bd oscillations
will fix all the Wolfenstein’s parameters, A, and ( is well known).
b c
W
b u
W
A
A
b
d
W
t
Wt
_d
b
__
A 1
III) CP Violation and B-meson System
0 0 0
i 0 0
i 1 i 0
1 i
1
i 1
VCKM =
CKM matrix relevant for B Physics(CP violation is all due to ≠ 0)
CKM Unitarity Triangles
VtdVtb + VcdVcb
+ VudVub = 0 VtdVud
+ VtsVus + VtbVub
= 0
Vub
Vcb
Vtd
Vub
Vtd
Vts
arg Vcb = 0, arg Vub = , arg Vtd = , arg Vts =
bu
1
mdBfB2F(mt)|VtdVtb|2
From the neutral kaon system > 0
Unitarity triangle
Vtd ei
Vub ei
and aredefined by thesides
NB: Br(K ) measuresalso |Vtd|
CP violation in Bd J/ KS v.s. Bd J/ KS
measures the phase of Vtd, i.e.
compare two measurements = consistency test
b
d
W
t
Wt
_d
b
__HB-B (Vtb
Vtd )2 ei
Bd- Bd
_b c
d d
c
sBd
J/
KS
b s
d d
cc
Bd KS
W
g
Wt,c,u Penguin effect
is negligible
_ ABJ/Ks Vcb Vcs e0i
Bd
Bd J/KS
Bd
J/
By 2005, CLEO, BaBar, BELLE, CDF, D0 and HERA-B will have
-accurate |Vub|, |Vcb| and - from CP violation in Bd J/ KS with ~ 0.025(Expected range in the Standard Model: 0.3<sin2<0.8)
Possibilities area) There will be already a sign of new physics:
-precision measurements in different decay modes in order to pin down the details of new physics.
b) Measurements look “consistent” with the Standard model.-what could happen?Let’s make the following “interesting” scenario.
b
d
W
t
Wt
_d
b
__
b
s
W
t
Wt
_s
b
__
HB-B 1 rdb] ei( db)
b
d
_d
b
_
b
s
_s
b
_
newFCNC
newFCNC
Bd- BdBd- Bd
Bs- Bs
_
_
A model for new physics
_
HB-B rsb ] ei( sb)_
Measured bu
1
Measured m(Bd) 1 + rdb
1 from SM box
defined by the measured triangle.
defined bythe CKM triangleVtd ei
=
=
CP violation in Bd J/ KS v.s. Bd J/ KS
measures J/K = db
If the model is such that numerically db ≈ “J/K = ”
CP measurement and triangle measurements agreeeach other.
Look consistent with the Standard Model!
Bd-Bd ei( db)_
BdJ/ KS Vcb Vcs e0i
BABAR and BELLE may have difficulty to access CP violation in Bd
-experimental problemsmall branching fraction < 10 (CLEO)
-theoretical problemlarge penguin contribution
sb ud d
us
Bd
W bu
d dBd g
Wt,c,u
uK
K
CLEO: Br() < Br(K) 1.4 10 penguin is large
T (VusVub)2 P [P(mt
2)VtsVtb]2 P2(mt
2)
Top penguin dominates in Bd K P (mt2) <1)
d
b ud d
ud
Bd
Wb
u
d d
Bd g
W t,c,u
u
T (VudVub)2 P [P(mt
2)VtdVtb]2 P2(mt
2)
Br()<Br(K) penguin is large; P (mt) > = 0
VudVub ei Vtd
Vtb P(mt2)P(mc
2) + Vud
Vub P(mu2)P(mc
2) P(mt
2)P(mc2) ei
+P(mu2)P(mc
2) ei
Problem: tree and penguin have different phases
CP violation in Bd is not really possible forCDF and D0: no particle ID, HERA-B: not enough statistics
Bd can be used only if we know penguin/tree.A way out:
measure Br( 0) and Br(0 0) not enough statistics
CP violation in Bd , , 00
-experimental problemdecay time dependent Dalitz plot analysis
not enough statistics-theoretical problem
assume 0 to be always
CDF, D0 and HERA-B may be able to measure m(Bs)If m(Bs)/b <20. Does this help? Not really.
-It helps to reduce hadronic uncertainties: fB
2B (~20% error, lattice calculation)fB
2B(Bd)/fB2B(Bs) is much better known (~5% error)
-It is interesting if m(Bs) is really large; new physics.But it is out of their sensitivities.
m Bd( )Δm Bs( )
=A2λ 4 1 − ρ( )2 +η 2
[ ] + r db( )
A2λ2 + r sb( )
How can LHC attack the problem?1) Improve J/K measurement.
ATLAS, CMS: ~ 0.02/yearLHCb: ~ 0.01/year
2) Measure other angles using Bs
CP violation in BsJ/ measures J/ = + sb
ei( sb)Bs- Bs
_
b c
s s
c
s
J/
W
BsJ/ Vcb Vcs e0i
Penguin effect is negligible
If the model is such that numerically sb ≈ “J/ = ”It will still look consistent.
J/ is a easy final state to reconstructif the decay time resolution is good enough!
ATLAS, CMS: ~ 0.03/yearLHCb: ~ 0.01/year
CP = 1 (l = 0, 2)additional complication: J/
CP = 1 (l = 1) -angular momentum configuration has to be studied-
CP violation inBs Ds
K, DsK Bs Ds
K, DsK
We need to do much more!
Bs
Bs DsK
Bs DsK
b u
sc
K
WDs
s s
b c
su
Ds
WK
s s
ei
e0i
ei( sb)
+ c.c.
measures DsK = sb There is no more freedom left to make DsK = No hadronic uncertainty
Measured DsK disagrees with what one expects fromthe triangle relation New Physics
What are experimentally needed? - decay time resolution - K/ separation
Bs DsK Major background: Bs Ds (No CP violation)
Importance of particle identification and mass resolution
3) Further CP violation studies with Bd which requirevery high statistics (difficult for BaBar and Belle).
Bd D0K0, D0K0,D1,2K0
Bd D0K0, D0K0,D1,2K0
measure .
Bd D, D Bd D, D
measure 2 + db + ; 2 + i.e. inconsistent
No hadronic uncertainties.Experiment requires: K/ separation
hadron trigger
Very small visible branching fractions(10~10 )
Importance of particle identification
With signalevents
m = 13 MeV/c2
newparticles
newparticles
More generally new physics can appear inb = 1 process
through penguin
b = 2 processthrough box
through tree
b b, s
b b, snewparticles
d,s d
b d, s
d,s b
lor l
lor l
CP violation must be studied inBd decays via Oscillations bc+W and bu+WBs decays via Oscillations bc+W and bu+WBd,s,u decays via penguinsBd,s decays via box
Experimental conditions areSmall branching fractions many Bd,s,u’sRapid Bs oscillations decay time resolutionIncluding multi-body hadronic final states particle ID
mass resolution LHCb experiment
An example of shopping list: LHCb ATLAS/CMSBd JKS
Bs J Bs DSK (PID)
Bd DK (PID,Trigger)
Bd D* (PID)
Bd (PID)
Bd K (CP in gluonic penguin) (PID)
Bd ( BaBar 160 events, LHCb 670 events)Bs K (CP in radiative penguin) Bs Kll (CP in radiative penguin)
Bs oscillations, xs up to 75 38
Bs
V) Conclusions1) New results on CP violation in the neutral kaon system
will be available soon (~2000) and may indicate that the Superweak model is not valid.
2) B-meson system will provide a rich field for CP violation studies.
3) BaBar, Belle, CDF, D0 and HERA-B will observe CPviolation in BJ/KS (>2000) if CP violation is largely due to the standard model.
4) In order to look for new physics, a dedicatedexperiment at LHC, i.e. LHCb is needed.