cpap 2011-2015-draft_18nov

8/8/2019 CPAP 2011-2015-DRAFT_18NOV

1/89

8/8/2019 CPAP 2011-2015-DRAFT_18NOV

2/89

Table ofContent

THE FRAMEWORK .......................................................................................................... 1

PART I. BASIS OF RELATIONSHIP ............................................................................... 1

PART II. SITUATION ANALYSIS ................................................................................... 1

PART III. PAST COOPERATION AND LESSONS LEARNED .......... ........ ......... ..... .... 2

PART IV. PROPOSED PROGRAMME ........................................................................... 3

A. MILLENNIUM DEVELOPMENT GOALS AND POVERTY REDUCTION ...ERROR!BOOKMARK

NOT DEFINED.B. ENVIRONMENT, ENERGY AND CLIMATE CHANGE ....ERROR!BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED.C. DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE .................................ERROR!BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED.D. CRISIS PREVENTION AND RECOVERY......................ERROR!BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED.

PART V. PARTNERSHIP STRATEGY .......................................................................... 10

PART VI. PROGRAMME MANAGEMENT ................................................................ 12

PART VII. MONITORING AND EVALUATION....... ......... ......... ....... ........ ......... ........ 13

PART VIII. COMMITMENTS OF UNDP ...................................................................... 14

PART IX. COMMITMENTS OF THE GOVERNMENT .............................................. 14PART X. OTHER PROVISIONS .................................................................................... 18

ANNEX 1: RESULTS AND RESOURCES FRAMEWORK .......................................... 19

8/8/2019 CPAP 2011-2015-DRAFT_18NOV

3/89

G O V E R N M E N T O F I N D O N E S I A / U N D P C O U N T R Y P R O G R A M M E A C T I O N P L A N , 2 0 1 1 - 2 0 1 5

The Framework

The Government of INDONESIA and the UNDP are in mutual agreement withthe contents of

this document and their responsibilities in the implementation of the country programme,whichsupports the realization of the Governments Medium Term Development Plan 2010-2014.

Furthering their mutual agreement and cooperation for the realization of the MillenniumDevelopment Goals (MDGs) and the United Nations Conventions and Summits to which theGovernment of INDONESIA and UNDP are committed, and

Building upon the experience gained and progress made during the implementation of theprevious Country ProgrammeAction Plan (2006 to 2010), and

Entering into a new period of close cooperation (2011 to 2015),

The parties declare that these responsibilities will be fulfilled in a spirit of close cooperation

and have agreed as follows:

Part I. Basis ofRelationshi

1.1 Reference is made to the following agreements between the Republic of Indonesia and the UNDP:1) Revised Basic Agreement for the Provision of Technical Assistance, signed on 29 October

1954; 2) Special Fund Agreement, signed on 17 October 1960, and 3) Operational Assistance

Agreement, signed on 12 June 1969.

Part II. Sit ation Anal

sis

2.1 Indonesias achievements during the previous five years have been impressive. Its economyappears to have weathered the worst effects of the current global financial crisis as the secondmajor crisis of this nature to hit Indonesia within a decade. Unemployment has dropped from a

peak of 11 per cent in 2005 to just over 8 per cent in 2009. Poverty rates, while still high, have been gradually decreasing. Between 2002 and 2008, Indonesias Human Development Index

(HDI) has risen by an average of 1.4 per cent per year. Based on UNDPs revised HumanDevelopment Index released in 2010, Indonesia is highlighted as one of the top global movers,

ranking 4th

in terms of countries that have made the fastest progress in human development.Indonesia is on track to achieve many of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) by 2015,

including targets related to health and education, gender equality, poverty reduction andenvironmental sustainability.

2.2Since the return to democracy in 1998, Indonesia has achieved remarkable progress instrengthening democratic institutions. Indonesia held direct elections for president and parliament

in 2004 and 2009. Change of governments went smoothly from one political party to another. A popular incumbent president was re-elected in 2009 and direct elections for local heads of

government have been held since 2005. The Government of Indonesia has successfully ended adecades-long conflict in Aceh Province. New autonomy laws have enabled former combatants to

participate in local politics through direct elections. Now attention is shifting from crisis recovery

t th l t d l t d f th i I d i i i f fli t

8/8/2019 CPAP 2011-2015-DRAFT_18NOV

4/89


2.3Despite progress on many fronts, critical development challenges remain. Indonesias emergenceas a lower middle-income country has been characterised by uneven growth. Approximately 32.5million people out of a population of 230 million (or 14.15 per cent) live below the national

poverty line ($1.55 purchasing power parity (PPP)/person/day). However, in some regions - wherevulnerability to external shocks, natural disasters and infectious diseases impede progress towards

human development and the MDGs - the poverty rate is as high as 40 per cent.

2.4Climate change poses an additional threat to the achievement of MDGs. Comprising more than17,000 islands, Indonesia is especially vulnerable to rising sea levels and floods, while erraticweather patterns will impact agricultural production, especially among small-scale farmers and

fishermen. Indonesia is also a major emitter of greenhouse gases, largely caused by deforestationand the burning of peat lands. These practices contribute to global warming and threatenlivelihoods, biodiversity, peace and stability.

2.5Political decentralization has brought decision-making closer to the people, but it has also exposedtechnical and administrative capacity gaps at local levels of government, especially in less

developed regions. Improvement in the quality of public services provided at local levels has been

slow, and regional disparity in local government capacity contributes to rising inequalities. Womenand marginalized groups continue to suffer disproportionately from discrimination, abuse of powerand corruption. Democratic institutions remain fragile. The scale and complexity of legislative,

presidential and local executive elections continues to test the capacity of election management

bodies. Democratic consolidation will require broader efforts to promote participation. Political parties and civil society organizations, in particular, need strengthening to facilitate public

participation in democratic processes.

2.6 Indonesias emergence as a lower middle-income country has altered the development cooperationcontext. The Government is less dependent on international development assistance. Under theJakarta Commitment, Aid for Development Effectiveness: Indonesia's Road Map to 2014, the

Government has called for: (a) stronger national ownership in defining the aid architecture; (b) ashift from donor-recipient relationships to those of equal partnerships of mutual benefit; (c)moving from financial assistance to a more strategic and catalytic role of aid; (d) transition from

scattered project-based assistance to a more programmatic approach; (e) stronger focus on capacitydevelopment and results-orientation embedded in national programmes; and (f) greater mutual

accountability and alignment between the Government and international partners.

Part III. Past Cooperation and Lessons Learned

3.1A primary focus of the country programme over the past five years has been the recovery of Acehand Nias following the devastation of the Indian Ocean tsunami and 30 years of conflict. Thecontribution of UNDP to the emergency and the $9 billion recovery effort highlighted theimportance of maintaining flexibility and responsiveness. Working in disadvantaged areas also

underlined the importance of maintaining a geographic focus for greater impact of results anapproach encouraged by UNPDF1 and the Assessment of Development Results (ADR). A

geographic focus allows for tailoring policies and actions to local realities, as well as targetingvulnerabilities and regions that are lagging behind on MDGs and other human developmentindicators. It also facilitates the piloting and demonstration of methodologies on the ground that

i f li ki i th i d t th ti l l l

8/8/2019 CPAP 2011-2015-DRAFT_18NOV

5/89


3.2The importance of linking policy with practice has been highlighted by UNDP experience acrossall programme areas. As an example, UNDP support for improving social policy targeting and

budget allocations in three provinces served as a key reference for new national guidelines onpro-poor planning and budgeting. UNDP efforts to link policy and practice have also highlighted

the importance of systematic knowledge management and communication strategies. MDG

monitoring and National and Provincial Human Development Reports have proven to be effectivetools for translating local experience into ideas for transformative interventions at higher levels.

3.3UNDP engagement in joint United Nations programmes and programming, such as tsunamirecovery work in Aceh, disaster risk reduction, HIV and AIDS education and the strengthening ofnational human rights institutions has underlined the importance of strengthening collaborationwith other United Nations agencies. The UNPDF will be used to guide the new country

programme to ensure a more coherent approach to United Nations work in Indonesia and to

enable synergies with other United Nations agencies for greater impact.

3.4At the same time, the ADR recommendations remind UNDP of the need for innovativeapproaches (including knowledge networking) and strategic positioning, thus establishing a nichewhere comparative advantages can be used to contribute more effectively to developmentcooperation. The implementation of this strategy has already begun through support to the JakartaCommitment, assistance to multi-partner finance mechanisms and renewed emphasis on strategic

policy-level engagements. Recommendations from the mid-term review and ADR alsoencouraged the maximization of impact through focus on results-based management, monitoring

and evaluation and communication of results.

3.5UNDP has made significant progress in advancing gender equality across its programmes. Thenew country programme will seize further opportunities for empowering women and advancinggender empowerment. A guide for mainstreaming gender equality can be found in the Peace

Through Development programme. Through this project UNDP succeeded in significantly boosting womens participation in crisis-sensitive development planning. Since 2007 womensparticipation in official planning processes has increased by up to 50 per cent in areas targeted by

the programme.

Part IV. Proposed Programme

4.1.The overall aim of this country programme is to ensure through support to national efforts forachieving MDGs and sustainable human development, that development does not leave behindthe vulnerable and disadvantaged. The country programme is anchored in Indonesias new

Medium-term Development Plan for 20102014 and the UNPDF (2011-2015). Organized intothree volumes, the Medium-term Development Plan outlines Indonesias overall developmentframework and identifies national priorities and focus regions. Guided by the Medium-term

Development Plan, the UNPDF emphasizes three themes: (a) equity in access to services, benefits, and opportunities for work; (b) participation; and (c) resilience to external shocks,

disasters, conflict and climate change.2

2 Th UNPDF 5 i h 11 b 7 f hi h f di l h

8/8/2019 CPAP 2011-2015-DRAFT_18NOV

6/89


4.2.The overall approach of the country programme is based on three strategic elements: (a) nationalpolicy engagement; (b) geographic focus on disadvantaged regions; and (c) linking policy with

practice. This closely aligns with the Medium-term Development Plan and the UNPDF. Policyengagement at the central level will involve policy analysis and advocacy as well support to the

implementation of the Jakarta Commitment. UNDP efforts to accelerate development in

disadvantaged regions will build on the successful support provided to these areas in the past e.g., tsunami response in Aceh and the People-Centered Development programme in Papua. Thethird element linking policy with practice ensures that knowledge generated by work at thelocal level is effectively managed to inform policy debates at the centre and across other regions.

Sound practices in knowledge management will also be harnessed to deepen Indonesiasengagement in South-South dialogue. Indonesia has much to gain from deeper engagement inSouth-South dialogue as well as much to contribute, especially in the areas of disaster response,democratic reform and decentralization.

4.3.The new development effectiveness context also calls for strategic linkages between UNDP, otherUnited Nations agencies and development partners. UNDP will support mechanisms (working

groups, dialogue among partners) to build capacities in each key area of the Jakarta Commitment.Resource mobilization strategies will also be adapted to the changing context, with moreemphasis on innovative financing such as trust funds, multi-donor mechanisms and private sector

partnerships. Activities and resources will be synergised with those of the Government and

development partners.

4.4.The country programme is organised into four programme components, each of which contributesdirectly to the Medium-term Development Plan and UNPDF outcome areas: (a) MDGs and

Poverty Reduction; (b) Environment, Energy and Climate Change; (c) Democratic Governance;and (d) Crisis Prevention and Recovery. Each programme component is aligned with specificMedium-term Development Plan and UNPDF targets. By giving special attention to Aceh, Papua

and Nusa Tenggara Timur provinces, all programme components are aligned with Medium-termDevelopment Plan Priority 10 Development of less developed areas, and UNPDF Outcome 1 Poor and most vulnerable people are better able to access quality social services and protection in

accordance with the Millennium Declaration.

4.5.The country programme seeks to ensure the meaningful participation of vulnerable andmarginalized groups, including indigenous people and women. Gender is being mainstreamed

across regional and thematic programme interventions, including in the support provided to localinstitutions with a view to capacitating the Government to address the needs of marginalized and

vulnerable groups in a systematic and institutionalized manner. Particular focus will be placed onincreasing womens participation in decision-making and on increasing their access to justice

mechanisms.

4.6.The Results and Resources Framework, attached as Annex 1 to this document, sets out thespecific outcomes, outputs, indicators, and targets for each area of work in the CPAP. The sectionwhich follows therefore provides a summary of the planned areas of work and the major

interventions that UNDP will support towards achieving its objectives. The areas of workoutlined have been identified within the UNPDF as areas in which UNDP has comparativeadvantage and can provide high value-added support to the country.

8/8/2019 CPAP 2011-2015-DRAFT_18NOV

7/89


A. Millenni m De elopment Goals and povert

reduction

Supporting Medium-term Development Plan Priorities 4 and 10; UNPDF Outcomes 1, 2,

and 3

4.6The MDG and poverty reduction programme aims to help Indonesia in its final push towardsachieving the MDGs. In partnership with other United Nations agencies, UNDPs MDG and

poverty reduction programme is designed to (a) strengthen national and subnational capacities tomonitor, analyse and promote the MDGs and Human Development and (b) accelerate regionaldevelopment and the achievement of the MDGs in disadvantaged regions, such as Papua, West

Papua, Nusa Tenggara Timur and West Nusa Tenggara. Emphasis will be placed on developingthe capacity of national and subnational institutions in formulating and implementing MDG-

based development strategies and programmes, and linking those strategies to budgetary processes and regulatory frameworks, as well as ensuring improved targeting of resources

towards the poor and vulnerable. UNDPs human development and MDG-based knowledgeproducts will serve as key references for policy-making at the national and regional levels.

4.7To ensure better targeting of resources toward the poor and vulnerable, UNDP will seek toaugment both national and sub-national systems for planning, budgeting, monitoring andevaluation. Specifically, the programme will support the integration of pro-poor dimens ionsandcriteria, such as MDG targets and Human Development Indicators,intoplanning and budgetary

allocation systemswhile ensuring that the respective organizations have the requisiteskills and

competencies to implement the systems. In this regard, UNDP will build onits past experience ofsupporting pro-poor planning, budgeting, and monitoring in various provinces and districts, and

will use the lessons learnt to scale up the replication of these models across the country whilemaintaining the flexibility to adapt to the diverse and unique context of each target area.

Particular emphasis will be placed on the provinces of Aceh, East Nusa Tenggara, Papua and

West Papua.

4.8 In partnership with the BAPPEDAs in the target areas, UNDP will promote the establishment oflocal economic development facilities to serve as technical resource centers, facilitating

coordination between government and other stakeholders such as civil societies, universities, andthe private sector under the public-private partnership framework. These facilities will provide

technical assistance to the design and implementation of local economic development, investment promotion, and resource mobilization strategies and plans. They will also help to foster more

effective coordination between different stakeholders with a view to ensuregreater synergy andmaximum impact from the various economic development and poverty reduction initiatives.Focus would be given to UNPDF target areas where additional and well targetedresources are

most needed to effectively combat poverty.

4.9To better protectthe poor, vulnerable and marginalized group from various types of shocks, theprogrammewillassist the Government in strengthening the national social protection system. The primary areas of emphasis will be (a) supportingthe development of a comprehensive social protection policy framework and, once the policy framework is established, (b) designingan

effective financing mechanism to support the implementation of the social protection system. Athird, complementary measure will be the establishment ofa Crisis and Vulnerability Monitoring

8/8/2019 CPAP 2011-2015-DRAFT_18NOV

8/89


4.10 In the past programming cycle UNDP supported the development of the MDG roadmap asone strategy to help accelerate achievement of the social development priorities and MDG targets

outlined in the RPJMN. In this programming cycle, UNDP will focus on supporting theimplementation of the roadmap through various interventions, including, but not limited to, the

development of implementation strategies and financing mechanisms for key action points

outlined in the roadmap. UNDP will also seek to enhance the governments capacity to monitor,analyze, evaluate and report achievements and progress againstthe MDGs and other humandevelopment indicators at the national and sub-national levels.

4.11 Over the last few years, and partly as a result of its recent graduation to middle incomecountry status, Indonesias role in international forahas become more prominent. In line withMDG goal number 8, UNDP will supportIndonesias efforts to play a stronger role infosteringregional and global partnerships for development by leveraging its position within

bodies such as the G20, ASEAN, the UN and others. Indonesia also holds aspirations to become asouth-south centre of excellence. This is an area where UNDP will provide specific support

drawingon its in-house expertise and global experiences.

4.12 With the gradual decline in official development assistance to Indonesia, measures to enhanceaid effectivenessand maximize development impact are becoming increasingly more important.UNDP will therefore continue its support to enhance aid effectiveness in the country, while

ensuring that national stakeholders remain in the driving seat of the development process. Withinthe framework of the ongoing Aid for Development Effectiveness initiative, the new CPAP will

aim to facilitate stronger coordination between the government and various actors, includingbilateral and multilateral development partners as well as the private sector and civil society.

4.13 UNDP will also help the Government to tap into new funding mechanisms as well as accessglobal trust funds and financing facilities to support development programmes. As required,

UNDP will also continue to provide technical assistance to strengthen capacities of state and non-state actors to manage resources secured through these facilities, and will draw on the successfulexperiences with prior initiatives such as the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tubercolosis and

Malaria (GFATM) funded national HIV/AIDS programme.

4.14 The new programme cycle will see higher levels of cooperation between UNDPs Povertyprogramme unit and other programme units on issues such as livelihood development (generally

and particularly as relates to climate change and REDD) and decentralized governance capacity.These are issues that are commonly included as components of projects across all programme

areas and which would benefit from lessons learnt and expertise from different units.

B. Environment,energy and climatechange Su pporting National Medium-term Development Plan Priorities 8 and 9; UNPDF

Outcome 5

4.15 In response to the growing concern regarding the potential impact of climate change on

8/8/2019 CPAP 2011-2015-DRAFT_18NOV

9/89


climate change adaptation and mitigation; renewable energy/energy efficiency; and sustainablenatural resource management.

4.16 Indonesia has pledged to reduce its carbon emissions by between 26 and 41 per cent by 2020,depending on the degree of support obtained from international partners. Given the magnitude of

this undertaking and the complexity of the challenges posed by climate change, a multi-

stakeholder approach will need to be promoted. UNDP will continue to facilitate coordinationamong international development partners and national stakeholders to strengthen the climatechange policy framework especially in areas relating to the reduction of emissions fromdeforestation and land degradation (REDD). This coordination will be key to support the

finalization of the national REDD strategy. To complement the policy framework, UNDP willalso support the establishment of a dedicated national agency for REDD. Once established, theagency will be responsible for coordination and effective implementation of the REDD strategy,including its independent monitoring and reporting. UNDP will provide capacity development

services as necessary to ensure that the agency is equipped with adequate technical and functionalcapacities, including capacity to mobilize and manage resources for the implementation of the

REDD strategy. UNDP will also support the development of infrastructure, regulatory

frameworks and benefit-sharing mechanisms for reducing emissions from deforestation anddegradation.

4.17 UNDP will continue supporting Indonesias efforts to access new funding mechanisms byhighlighting the needs of communities most vulnerable to the effects of climate change. Workingat both national and local levels, UNDP will aim to strengthen capacities toaccess and manage

existing climate change financing mechanisms such as theMLF, GEF, AF, and SCCF.Additionally, UNDP will support efforts to build strong and innovative partnershipswith the

private sector, and to access private sector resources as one possible source of domestic fundingfor climate change initiatives.

4.18

At the sub-national level, the climate change programme will focus on helping provincial anddistrict governments in managing climate risk. Special attentionwill be given to UNPDF priority provinces, especially communities which are heavily exposed to hydro-meteorological hazards.

The climate change programme will work together with the disaster risk reduction programme ofthe crisis prevention and recovery practice area, which has initiated support at the sub-national

level on reducing the risk of various hazards including climatic hazards. The climate changeperspective will augment the existing disaster risk reduction work by (a) adding the analysis of

incremental magnitudes, frequencies and unpredictability of climatic hazards to the risk equation;(b) exploring and introducing innovative measures that can be applied to reduce those risks; and

(c) aligning DRR and Climate Change policy frameworks to ensure greater effectiveness.

4.19

UNDP will support the government and key stakeholders in promoting, adopting andmanaging renewable energy and energy efficiencies in more effective and innovative ways.Support will target (a) improving the national policy and institutional environment and incentive

systems to facilitate and enable wide scale adoption and investments in renewable energy andenergy efficient technologies across both the public and private sectors, and (b) integrating

renewable energy/energy efficiency policies into national and local development plans andclimate change strategies. UNDP will also support the government in exploring possibilities fordeveloping public private partnerships on renewable energy and energy efficiency.

8/8/2019 CPAP 2011-2015-DRAFT_18NOV

10/89


environment, focusing on the reduction of persistent organic pollutants (POPs). Subsequently,attention will be given to the development of a National Implementation Plan (NIP) on POPsreduction together with its monitoring system. UNDP will also support the Government in

ensuring adherence to international conventions ratified by Indonesia.

4.21 UNDP will partner with government, private sector and community-based organizations toensure that there are coherent and effective policy frameworks, action plans and fundingmechanisms in place to manage terrestrial ecosystems in target areas. Special attention will be

placed on designing, through a broad participatory process, the policy framework and regulationson forest and watersheds management at the national and local levels. UNDP will also provide

support to stakeholders in designing innovative models to involve community basedorganizations in the management of terrestrial eco-systems. This is intended to help enhancecommunity ownership and involvement while supporting the creation of livelihood opportunities.

4.22 UNDP will also provide similar support for sustainable management of coastal and marineecosystems. Priority will be given to the establishment of a national database on coastal and

marine resources and trans-boundary problems. While maintaining support to the development

and implementation of a national action plan, UNDP-Indonesia in partnership with itsRegionalSupport Centre in Bangkok will also support the development and adoption of an inter-governmental Strategic Action Plan on trans-boundary marine ecosystem.

C. Democratic governanceSupporting National Medium-term Development Plan Priority 1; UNPDF Outcome 3

4.23 After a successful decade of reforming democratic institutions, attention is shifting to thequality of democracy in Indonesia. Public sector reform for good governance is priority number

one in Indonesias latest Medium-term Development Plan and a focus area of its Long-termDevelopment Plan (2005-2025). UNDP support will focus on strengthening (a) the integrity of political, bureaucratic and judicial institutions; (b) the accountability and representativeness of

political parties; (c) public engagement in transparent and inclusive policymaking; (d) legalempowerment to protect rights and control abuses of power; and (e) public service standards and

bureaucratic reform.With participation as its unifying theme, the UNDP democratic governanceprogrammeis organized in three sub-clusters: (a) civic engagement and democratic representation;

(b) promoting access to justice and rights-based legal and justice sector reform; and (c)strengthened capacity of local government to deliver basic services.

4.24 To promote public representation and participation in political and government institutions, theprogramme will support national and sub-national parliaments in establishing and implementingmechanisms to strengthen constituent representation. This will include support to theestablishment of constituent offices especially in UNPDF targeted areas, namely Aceh, NTT andPapua. The programme will also build on existing mechanisms that promote citizen participation(e.g. Civic Education Centers) and strengthen these initiatives at national and sub-national levels.

Emphasis will be placed onadvancing therepresentation and participation of women andindigenous people in both political institutions and government bodies.This will be particularlyrelevant for interventions in Papua where participation of indigenous persons is strongly

d d d d b i l l

8/8/2019 CPAP 2011-2015-DRAFT_18NOV

11/89


their functions. At the national level, support will target the revision of policies and the regulatoryframework on decentralization, together with measures to support effective implementation. Atthe sub-national level, the programme will support local authorities in target areas to improve

their public service delivery through the refinement and implementation of minimum servicestandards (MSS) which will encompass public complaints and control mechanisms. The

programme will simultaneously focus on supporting the local authorities to adopt and integratehuman development and millennium development goals, indicators and targets in local

development planning and budgeting processes. This will be partly supported by closecollaboration between the Democratic Governance and MDG and Poverty reduction Units withinUNDP.

4.26 UNDPs support to provincial government capacity development will be tailored to meet theunique requirements of provinces such as Aceh and Nias, and to take into account the recovery

processes in the area. The 2004 tsunami devastated public infrastructure and hampered both

governments from effectively delivering public services. In the case of Nias, decentralized publicservice delivery is also made more challenging due to the geographic and demographic make-up

of the province which includes a large number of islands with diverse ethnic and cultural

groups.For Aceh, the situation is also compounded by the post-conflict environment and the highnumber of new leaders that have little knowledge and training in democratic and administrativemanagement processes. Consequently, a special capacity development approach will be requiredto support both governments in the transformation process from recovery to normal development

and to address the additional challenges of strengthening post-conflict governance and developingcapacity to handle climate change. The Democratic Governance Unit will continue to collaborate

with the Crisis Prevention and Recovery Unit in designing and implementing initiatives for theseprovinces and will spearhead UNDPs area-based intervention in Nias.

4.27 With respect to justice and human rights protection for women and vulnerable groups UNDPwill work with stakeholders to leverage the gains made in developing and implementing the

National Strategy on Access to Justice. UNDP will continue to partner with the Government,CSOs and other United Nations agencies to develop the capacity of Indonesias three nationalhuman rights institutions.Special attention will be given to strengthening the capacity of

indigenous communities and adat organizations in target areas on human rights advocacy and tohandle grievances in a more effective, accountable and sustainable manner. The programme will

strive to ensure the integration of justice and conflict-prevention activities in conflict-affectedareas through collaboration between programme components.

D. Crisis prevention and recoverySupporting National Medium-term Development Plan Priorities 9, 10 and 14; UNPDF

Outcome 4

4.28 The crisis prevention and recovery programme will support the Government in the areas of (a)conflict prevention, (b) disaster risk reduction, and (c) post -crisis recovery. The programme

seeks to build on the successes of the past five years and institutionalize lessons at the nationaland local levels in each focus area.

8/8/2019 CPAP 2011-2015-DRAFT_18NOV

12/89


local governments to institutionalize recovery tools and mechanisms that have been developedand apply global best practices and principles of do no harm, build back better, gender,environmental sustainability and good governance. UNDP will also support the Government in

establishing multi-partner funding facilities to mobilize resources and coordinate disasterresponse and recovery.Drawing on its proven track record in disaster response, UNDP will join

the World Bank and other United Nations agencies in supporting the Government of Indonesia toestablish a standing disaster-response facility.

4.30 The Government and the donor community regard UNDP as a lead partner in disaster riskreduction. Disaster risk reduction activities will be designed to strengthen national and

subnational capacities to reduce the risk of, and increase resilience to disasters. UNDP willcontinue its work in supporting the formulation of policy and regulatory frameworks, especiallyat the sub-national level in the UNPDF target provinces. The programme will promote theconduct of accurate and reliable risk assessments as the basis of risk reduction initiatives.

Emphasis will be placed on public participation in disaster risk reduction and the application ofcommunity-based disaster risk reduction measures. Initiatives will be aligned with UNDPs

support to climate change adaptation in a number of high-risk provinces.

4.31 Building on its successes in mainstreaming conflict-sensitive practices into regular governmentdevelopment processes, the programme will upscale field level experiences and practices into

policy formulation at the national level. Specific attention will be given to the formulation of a

regulatory framework that would enable government and civil society to better manage and, tothe extent possible, prevent conflict. The programme will support the establishment,at the

national level, of an institutional system that would facilitate coordination between variousstakeholders to ensure effective conflict management. Tools and mechanisms for conflict

prevention and early warning will be developed based on international good practices and promoted as an integral part of the national institutional system. This will involve greateremphasis on communicating results, especially lessons learned from the piloting of conflict-

prevention methodologies.

4.32 In the last programme cycle, crisis prevention and recovery were the major areas of UNDP programme intervention in the province of Aceh. This programme component will continue tofacilitate and provide a platform for the interventions of other programme components outlined in

this Country Programme Action Plan. As the recovery process winds down in Aceh, the crisisrecovery programme will gradually be concluded and replaced by a blended portfolio focusing on

disaster risk reduction, climate change mitigation and adaptation, and post-conflict governancecapacities. The Aceh component of the programme will be supported by UNDPs Crisis

Prevention and Recovery, Environment, and Democratic Governanceunits.

Part V. Partnership Strategy

5.1.Recognizing the importance of strategic partnerships to achieving results and maximizing impact,UNDP will work in close collaboration with the Government, UN System, other multi and

bilateral development partners, CSOs as well as the private sector in support of Indonesiasefforts to improve human development and achieve the Millennium Development Goals.Deepening and broadening partnerships will be a major focus of the 2011-2015 CPAP.

8/8/2019 CPAP 2011-2015-DRAFT_18NOV

13/89


on Harmonization; (iv) Governments Medium Term Development Plan, Local PovertyReduction Strategy Paper (PRSP), Master Plan for Reconstruction in Aceh and Nias; and the (v)the United Nations Partnership Assistance Framework 2010-2015. Each of these framework

documents outlines key national stakeholders and, in some instances, identifies areas andopportunities for collaborative effort and joint programming to accomplish common objectives.

The strategy will also build on national and international experiences and best practices in promoting south-south and other forms of cooperation as well as in fostering public-private

partnership for development in line with the Global Compact Principles. Finally, it will also beinformed by experiences with common funding mechanisms such as the HIV/AIDS Global Fund,GEF, Montreal Protocol and Multi-Donor Trust Fund for Aceh and Nias.

5.3.While continuing to strengthen existing partnerships with national and sub-national authoritiesinvolved in the previous programme cycle, UNDP will explore opportunities to engage with newState and non-State partners that can help to achieve important national objectives. UNDP will

also support the Government in developing stronger partnerships with the private and not-for- profit sectors given the important role that they play in national development. Specifically in

relation to the private sector, a key objective is to build partnerships that facilitate and enableprivate sector participation in, and contribution to the overall development process. Priority areas

of attention in the new CPAP include public/private partnerships to support the national MDGroadmap, as well as in support of climate change and renewable energy.

5.4.In addition to forging partnerships UNDP will also support efforts to strengthen private sectorcapacity to adopt sustainable development practices in their day today management and business

processes, to help Indonesia move towards a greener, low carbon economy. Similar efforts will bemade to enhance awareness of, and capacity to implement inclusive business practices as a means

of expanding the provision of goods and services to the poor and increasing the share ofeconomic added value that goes to small and micro-producers/suppliers. UNDP will work closelywith the implementing partners of each programme component to explore possibilities of

establishing partnership with the private sector.

5.5.Partnership at the decentralized level will be particularly important, given the need to improvecapacities for public services delivery at this level and to involve local stakeholders, includingmarginalized populations, more effectively in decision-making and service delivery processes. In

addition to deepening its relationships with decentralized stakeholders, UNDP will also seek tosupport inter-provincial, inter-district and inter-national south-south and north-south partnerships

and knowledge sharing arrangements to leverage both local and international best practices. Someof the key areas in the CPAP which will benefit from these partnership and knowledge sharing

arrangements are: decentralized governance; community disaster risk reduction and management;sub-national climate change and REDD+ strategies, action plans and benefit-sharingarrangements; and local economic development models. Partnerships that involve cost-sharing

arrangements will also be importantin mobilizing the resources required to have a greater impacton key human development indicators and MDG targets at the provincial and district levels.

5.6. Civil Society Organizations have been critical partners that have enabled UNDP and nationalauthorities to effectively mobilize communities, provide services, and involve citizens indecision-making processes. These partnerships have been equally important across UNDPs

portfolio, including areas such as disaster risk reduction, decentralization, access to justice,

it d l t d li lih d i t UNDP ill ti t i t i th

8/8/2019 CPAP 2011-2015-DRAFT_18NOV

14/89


implementing partners in the process of both formulating and monitoring the implementation ofthe partnership agreements.

5.7.Within the context of the Jakarta Commitment on Aid Effectiveness and the new UN PartnershipAssistance Framework, UNDP will also work closely with other sister UN agencies to identify

opportunities for further collaboration and joint programming in support of national objectives.Building on the strong collaborative arrangements already in place in areas such as Disaster Risk

Reduction and Recovery, REDD, and Parliamentary Development, UNDP will prioritiseadditional areas for joint efforts. Discussions have already been initiated on topics such as SocialProtection, the MDG Roadmap, and Livelihoods development in NTT.

5.8.Guided by the above, each programme component will be implemented in partnership withspecific entities. For details, please see the Results and Resources Framework for eachcomponent (Annex 1).

Part VI. Programme Management

6.1 The programme will be nationally executed under the overall coordination of the NationalDevelopment Planning Agency, Bappenas, which is legally tasked with coordinating theimplementation of the National Medium Term Development Plan. Government ministries, NGOsand UN agencies including UNDP will implement programme activities. The responsible

Government agency will nominate the Government Co-operating Agency directly responsible forthe Governments participation in each UNDP assisted Annual Work Plans (AWP). The AWPs

describe the specific programme level results to be achieved and will form the basic agreement between UNDP and each implementing partner on the use of resources. The reference to

Implementing Partners shall mean Executing Agencies in the previous CPD.

6.2 In programme design and implementation, UNDP works closely with Bappenas and key partners. The country programme builds on the United Nations reform principles, especiallysimplification and harmonization, by operating in line with the harmonized common country

programming instruments such as the UNPDF results matrix, monitoring and evaluation, and

programme resources frameworks in the CPAP and the AWPs. To the extent possible UNDP andpartners will use the minimum documents necessary, namely the signed CPAP and signed AWPs

to implement programmatic initiatives. However, as necessary and appropriate, projectdocuments would be prepared using, inter alia, the relevant text from the CPAP, and AWPs.

UNDP will sign the project documents with Bappenas and implementing partners in accordancewith corporate practices and national requirements. In line with the UNDG Joint Programming

Guidance Note, the scope of inter-agency cooperation is strengthened to cultivate newprogramme and geographical convergence.

6.3 Atlas contributes to timely, efficient delivery of activities and effective financial monitoring tomanage projects and the UNDP programme.

6.4 All cash transfers to an Implementing Partner are based on the Annual Work Plans agreedbetween the Implementing Partner and UNDP.

6.5 Cash transfers for activities detailed in AWPs can be made by UNDP using the followingd liti i) C h t f d di tl t th I l ti P t ) P i t th t t f

8/8/2019 CPAP 2011-2015-DRAFT_18NOV

15/89


payments to vendors or third parties for obligations incurred by UN agencies in support ofactivities agreed with Implementing Partners. Where cash transfers are made toBappenas,Bappenas shall transfer such cash promptlyto the relevant Implementing Partner(s).

6.6 Direct cash transfers shall be requested and released for programme implementation periods notexceeding three months. Reimbursements of previously authorized expenditures shall berequested and released quarterly or after the completion of activities. The UNDP shall not be

obligated to reimburse expenditure made by the Implementing Partner over and above theauthorized amounts.

6.7 Following the completion of any activity, any balance of funds shall be reprogrammed by mutualagreement between the Implementing Partner and UNDP, or refunded.

6.8 Cash transfer modalities, the size of disbursements, and the scope and frequency of assuranceactivities may depend on the findings of a review of the public financial management capacity inthe case of a Government Implementing Partner, and of an assessment of the financial

management capacity of the non-UN Implementing Partner. A qualified consultant, such as a public accounting firm selected by UNDP, may conduct such an assessmentin which the

Implementing Partnersand, as appropriate, other Ex Com agencies shall participate.

6.9 Cash transfer modalities, the size of disbursements, and the scope and frequency of assuranceactivities may be revised in the course of programme implementation based on the findings of

programme monitoring, expenditure monitoring and reporting, and audits.

6.10 Resource mobilization efforts will be intensified to support the RRF and ensure sustainability ofthe programme. Mobilization of other resources in the form of cost sharing, trust funds,government cash counterpart contributions, or other kinds of financial and non-financialcontributions will be undertaken to secure funding for the programme.

Part VII. Monitoring and Evaluation

7.1 UNDP fully supports the Governments recent efforts to increase its ownership ofdevelopmentaid coordination, monitoring and evaluation. In order for Government to be able to track aid flow

and its effectiveness, UNDP will support Government ownership and involvement in every stageof the programme and project cycle.

7.2 Monitoring and evaluation of the CPAP will be undertaken in line with the UNDAF resultsmatrix and monitoring and evaluation plan. The Government and UNDP will be responsible forsetting up the necessary harmonized M&E mechanisms, tools and conducting reviews, in orderto ensure continuous monitoring and evaluation of the CPAP, with the view to ensuring efficient

utilization of programme resources as well as accountability, transparency and integrity. Theimplementing partners will provide periodic reports on the progress, achievements and results of

their projects, outlining the challenges faced in project implementation as well as resourceutilization as articulated in the AWP. The reporting will be in accordance with the procedures

and harmonized with UN agencies to the extent possible. It is envisaged that 6-monthlymeetingsbetween Bappenas, UNDP and implementing partners will be a vehicle to aggregate and jointlyreview the progress made against the CPAP targets and its contribution to the Governments

N ti l M di T D l t Pl

8/8/2019 CPAP 2011-2015-DRAFT_18NOV

16/89


personnel responsible for the administration of cash provided by the UNDP. To that effect,Implementing partners agree to the following: i) Periodic on-site reviews and spot checks of theirfinancial records by UNDP or its representatives; ii) Programmatic monitoring of activities

following UNDPs standards and guidance for site visits and field monitoring; and iii) Special orscheduled audits. UNDP, in collaboration with other UN agencies, will establish an annual audit

plan, giving priority to audits of Implementing Partners with large amounts of cash assistanceprovided by UNDP, and those whose financial management capacity needs strengthening.

7.4 To facilitate assurance activities, Implementing partners and UNDP may agree to use aprogramme monitoring and financial control tool allowing data sharing and analysis.

7.5 The Supreme Audit Institution (SAI) may undertake the audits of government ImplementingPartners. If the SAI chooses not to undertake the audits of specific Implementing Partners to thefrequency and scope required by UNDP, UNDP will commission the audits to be undertaken by

private sector audit services.

7.6 Assessments and audits of non-government Implementing Partners will be conducted inaccordance with the policies and procedures of UNDP and the Government.

Part VIII. Commitments ofUNDP

8.1UNDP will ensure coherence between the Governments Medium Term Development Plan,CPAP, AWP, UNPDF results matrix and MDGs, including M & E reporting. Through annual

reviews,joint field missions and periodic progress reporting, the roles and responsibilities ofUNDP, the Government and implementing partners will be clearly defined.

8.2 In case of direct cash transfer or reimbursement, UNDP shall notify the Implementing Partner ofthe amount approved by UNDP and shall disburse funds to the Implementing Partner.

8.3 In case of direct payment to vendors or third parties for obligations incurred by the ImplementingPartners on the basis of requests signed by the designated official of the Implementing Partner; or

to vendors or third parties for obligations incurred by UNDP in support of activities agreed withImplementing Partners, UNDP shall proceed with the payment.

8.4UNDP shall not have any direct liability under the contractual arrangements concluded betweenthe Implementing Partner and a third party vendor.

8.5Where more than one UN agency provides cash to the same Implementing Partner, programmemonitoring, financial monitoring and auditing will be undertaken jointly or coordinated withthose UN agencies.

Part IX. Commitments ofthe Government

9.1 The Government shall apply the provisions of the Convention on the Privileges and Immunitiesof the United Nations agencies to UNDPs property, funds, and assets and to its officials andconsultants. In addition the Government will accord to UNDP and its officials and to other

persons performing services on behalf of UNDP, the privileges, immunities and facilities as set

t i th O ti l A i t A t i d i 12 J 1969

8/8/2019 CPAP 2011-2015-DRAFT_18NOV

17/89


i. The schedule of payments and UNDP bank account details.ii. The value of the payment, if made in a currency other than United States Dollars, shall be

determined by applying the United Nations operational rate of exchange in effect on the date of

payment. Should there be a change in the United Nations operational rate of exchange prior tothe full utilization by the UNDP of the payment, the value of the balance of funds still held at

that time will be adjusted accordingly. If, in such a case, a loss in the value of the balance offunds is recorded, UNDP shall inform the Government with a view to determining whether anyfurther financing could be provided by the Government. Should such further financing not be

available, the assistance to be provided to the CPAP may be reduced, suspended or terminatedby UNDP.

iii. The above schedule of payments takes into account the requirement that the payments shall bemade in advance of the implementation of planned activities. It may be amended to beconsistent with the progress of CPAP delivery.

iv. UNDP shall receive and administer the payment in accordance with the regulations, rules anddirectives of UNDP.

v. All financial accounts and statements shall be expressed in United States dollars unlessotherwise agreed between UNDP and the Government.

vi. If unforeseen increases in expenditures or commitments are expected or realized (whetherowing to inflationary factors, fluctuation in exchange rates or unforeseen contingencies), UNDP

shall submit to the government on a timely basis a supplementary estimate showing the furtherfinancing that will be necessary. The Government shall use its best endeavors to obtain theadditional funds required.

vii. If the payments referred above are not received in accordance with the payment schedule, or ifthe additional financing required in accordance with paragraph above is not forthcoming from

the Government or other sources, the assistance to be provided to the CPAP under thisAgreement may be reduced, suspended or terminated by UNDP.

viii. Any interest income attributable to the contribution shall be credited to UNDP Account andshall be utilized in accordance with established UNDP procedures.

ix. In accordance with the decisions and directives of UNDP's Executive Board:The contribution shall be charged:

a. Seven % cost recovery for the provision of general management support (GMS) byUNDP headquarters and country offices

b. Five % cost recovery for implementation support services (ISS) provided by UNDPand/or implementing partners.

x. Ownership of equipment, supplies and other properties financed from the contribution shall vesti UNDP M tt l ti t th t f f hi b UNDP h ll b d t i d i

Comment [s1]: To discuss with Beate.

8/8/2019 CPAP 2011-2015-DRAFT_18NOV

18/89


xi. The contribution shall be subject exclusively to the internal and external auditing proceduresprovided for in the financial regulations, rules and directives of UNDP

9.3 Mechanisms for participatory planning, monitoring and evaluation on the progress of thecountry programme involving civil society and other development partners will be

implemented. The Government is also committed to organize periodic programme review, planning and joint strategy meetings and where appropriate, coordination of sectoral and

thematic development partners groups to facilitate the participation of donors, civil society, private sector and UN agencies. In addition, the Government will facilitate periodic jointmonitoring visits by UNDP staff and/or designated officials for the purpose of monitoring,

meeting beneficiaries, assessing the progress and evaluating the impact of the use of programme resources. The Government will make available to UNDP information about policy and legislative changes occurring during the implementation of the CPAP that mighthave an impact in co-operation.

9.4 A standard Fund Authorization and Certificate of Expenditures (FACE) report, reflecting theactivity lines of the Annual Work Plan (AWP), will be used by Implementing Partners torequest the release of funds, or to secure the agreement that UNDP will reimburse or directly

pay for planned expenditure. The Implementing Partners will use the FACE to report on theutilization of cash received. The Implementing Partner shall identify the designated official(s)authorized to provide the account details, request and certify the use of cash. The FACE will

be certified by the designated official(s) of the Implementing Partner.

9.5 Cash transferred to Implementing Partners should be spent for the purpose of activities asagreed in the AWPs only.

9.6 Cash received by the Government and national NGO Implementing Partners shall be used inaccordance with established national regulations, policies and procedures consistent with

international standards, in particular ensuring that cash is expended for activities as agreed inthe AWPs, and ensuring that reports on the full utilization of all received cash are submitted toUNDP within six months after receipt of the funds. Where any of the national regulations,

policies and procedures is not consistent with international standards, the UN agencyregulations, policies and procedures will apply.

9.7 In the case of international NGO Implementing Partners cash received shall be used inaccordance with international standards in particular ensuring that cash is expended foractivities as agreed in the AWPs, and ensuring that reports on the full utilization of all received

cash are submitted to UNDP within six months after receipt of the funds.

9.8 To facilitate scheduled and special audits, each Implementing Partner receiving cash fromUNDP will provide UNDP or its representative with timely access to:

i. All financial records which establish the transactional record of the cashtransfers provided by UNDP;

ii. All relevant documentation and personnel associated with the functioning ofthe Implementing Partners internal control structure through which the cashtransfers have passed.

8/8/2019 CPAP 2011-2015-DRAFT_18NOV

19/89


i. Receive and review the audit report issued by the auditors.ii. Provide a timely statement of the acceptance or rejection of any audit

recommendation to the UNDP that provided cash (and where the SAI has

been identified to conduct the audits, add: and to the SAI).iii. Undertake timely actions to address the accepted audit recommendations.iv. Report on the actions taken to implement accepted recommendations to the

UN agencies (and where the SAI has been identified to conduct the audits,

add: and to the SAI), on a quarterly basis (or as locally agreed) .

8/8/2019 CPAP 2011-2015-DRAFT_18NOV

20/89


Part X. Other Provisions

10.1 This CPAP supersedes any previously signed CPAP between the Government of INDONESIAand UNDP and may be modified by mutual consent of both parties on the recommendations of

the joint strategy meeting.

IN WITNESS THEREOF the undersigned, being duly authorized, have signed this CountryProgramme Action Plan on this day xxDecember 2010in Jakarta, Indonesia.

For the Government of Indonesia For the United Nations Development Programme

Indonesia

Signature: _________________ Signature: _________________

Name: H.E. DR.Armida S. Alisjahbana Name: El-MostafaBenlamlih

State Minister for National Development

Planning

Resident Representative

8/8/2019 CPAP 2011-2015-DRAFT_18NOV

21/89

8/8/2019 CPAP 2011-2015-DRAFT_18NOV

22/89

20

and districts

3) Rate of poverty-vulnerability:

1) in UNPDFprovinces anddistricts

2) by sex3) by indigenous4) Percent of

poverty rate

and HDI

particularly inUNPDF areas

maximize poverty reduction efforts. 10 of priority Ministries and

State Agencies have adopted the planning and budgeting

methodology by 2011.

3)2 MOUs and 2 important joint initiatives between GOI and privatesector established through the framework of PPP-CSR for povertyreduction

4)60 CSOs in UNPDF areasTarget 2012

1)1,000 government2)20 priority Ministries and Agencies that have adopted the

planning and budgeting methodology3)2 additional MOUs and important joint initiatives between GOI

and private sector established through the framework of PPP-CSRfor poverty reduction

4)80 CSOs in UNPDF areasTarget 2013

1)1,500 government officials2)30 Ministries and Agencies have adopted the planning and

budgeting methodology

3)2 additional MOUs and 2 important joint initiatives between GOIand private sector established through the framework of PPP-CSR

for poverty reduction

4)100 CSOs in UNPDF areas

Target 2014

1)2,000 government officials2)40 number of Ministries and Agencies that have adopted the

planning and budgeting methodology3)2 additional MOUs and 2 important joint initiatives between GOIand private sector established through the framework of PPP-CSR

for poverty reduction4)120 CSOs in UNPDF areasTarget 2015

1)2,500 of government officials 50 Ministries and Agencies haveadopted the planning and budgeting methodology

2) 2 additional MOUs and 2 important joint initiatives between

Development

Performance

Evaluation

System

Other Resources

2,155 3,500 3,500

8/8/2019 CPAP 2011-2015-DRAFT_18NOV

23/89

21

Baseline:

(1) 25% of nationaland sub-nationalbudget allocated

for

poverty/vulnerabili

ty policies and

programmes

particularly in

UNPDF provincesand districts

(2) 25 % deliveryagainst budget law

(not budget

revision or

amendment) in

national andUNPDF provinces

and districts

(3) Rate of poverty-vulnerability:

y in UNPDFprovinces and

districts

y by sexdisaggregatio

n

y by indigenouspeople

Targets:

(1) 20% increase inactual budget

allocation figures

for national and

30% increase in

actual budget

allocation figures

GOI and private sector established through the framework of PPP-

CSR for poverty reduction

3)140 CSOs in UNPDF areas

8/8/2019 CPAP 2011-2015-DRAFT_18NOV

24/89

22

for sub-national

governments

(4) 40 % deliveryagainst budget law

(not budgetrevision or

amendment) in

national and

UNPDF provinces

and districts

(2) Lowered rate ofpoverty-vulnerability:

y in UNPDFprovinces and

districts

y by sexdisaggregatio

n

y by indigenouspeople

1.1.2. OUTPUT

Local economic

development facility

established at the sub-

national level,

providing technical

assistance in budgetallocation and financialmanagement,

coordination of PPP-

CSR engagement and

partnership with

universities and CSOs,

INDICATORS:

1)level of adoption of pro-poor and results based planning andbudgeting methodology at sub-national levels.

2)% of budget allocation for pro-poor programmes at the sub-national level, particularly in UNPDF areas

3)# of MOUs and important joint initiatives between sub-nationalgovernments and the private sector within the framework of aPPP-CSRat the sub-national level, particularly in UNPDF areas

4)# of high priority regions implementing comprehensive localeconomic and livelihood development strategies.

5)# of think-tanks and partnerships established between sub-national governments and Universities and CSOs, particularly in

UNPDF areas

Projects:

Proposed:

Local Economic

Development

Project in AcehNusa Tenggaraand Papua

Region

150

98 82

8/8/2019 CPAP 2011-2015-DRAFT_18NOV

25/89

23

particularly in UNPDF

areas3 Baseline:

1)P3BM tools has been applied in some provinces and districts2)25% of sub-national budget allocated for poverty programmes

particularly in UNPDF provinces and districts3)Non-existence of a PPP-CSR framework at the sub-national level4)There has been limited piloting of local economic and livelihood

development models in regions such as Papua and initial scoping

in Aceh.

5)Limitedavailability of quality partnerships between sub-nationalgovernments and Universities and CSOs

Target 2011:

1)6 provinces have adopted pro-poor and results based planningand budgeting methodologies in 2011.

2)30 % of budget allocated for pro-poor programmes at the sub-national level, particularly in UNPDF areas

3)2 MOUs and 2 important joint initiatives initiated between sub-national governments and the private sector within the

framework of a PPP-CSRat the sub-national level, particularly in

UNPDF areas

4)3 priority regions pilot comprehensive local economic andlivelihood development strategies.

5)1 think-tank and 2 partnerships established between sub-nationalgovernments and Universities and CSOs, particularly in 1 UNPDF

area

Target 2012:

1)12 provinces 35 % of budget allocated for pro-poor programmes atthe sub-national level, particularly in UNPDF areas



UNPDF areas

3 This output ill be ointly supported by s overnance and overty nits.

8/8/2019 CPAP 2011-2015-DRAFT_18NOV

26/89

24

3)1 think-tank and 2 partnerships established between sub-nationalgovernments and Universities and CSOs, particularly in 1 UNPDF

area

Target 20131) 18 provinces methodologies2) 40 % of budget allocated for pro-poor programmes at the sub-

national level, particularly in UNPDF areas

3) 2 MOUs and 2 important joint initiatives initiated between sub-national governments and the private sector within the


UNPDF areas4) 5 priority regions adopt comprehensive local economic and

livelihood development strategies.5)1 think-tank and 2 partnerships established between sub-national

governments and Universities and CSOs, particularly in 1 UNPDF

area

Target 2014

1)24 provinces2)45 % of budget allocated for pro-poor programmes at the sub-

national level, particularly in UNPDF areas


framework of a PPP-CSRat the sub-national level, particularly inUNPDF areas

4)7 priority regions adopt local economic and livelihooddevelopment strategies

5)1 think-tank and 2 partnerships established between sub-nationalgovernments and Universities and CSOs, particularly in 1 UNPDFarea

Target 2015

1)33 provinces 50 % of budget allocated for pro-poor programmes atthe sub-national level, particularly in UNPDF areas

8/8/2019 CPAP 2011-2015-DRAFT_18NOV

27/89

8/8/2019 CPAP 2011-2015-DRAFT_18NOV

28/89

26

Baseline:

(1)A policy frameworkexists for the

coverage of:

Poorest of thepoor(individual/hous

ehold level)

Poorcommunities

Near poor(2)Existing

methodologies are

inefficient andineffective

(3)The safety net onlytakes into account

the daily

consumption rate

Targets:

(1)Level of coverage isTBD with GOI

(2)Efficient andeffective targeting

based on joint

targetingmethodologies as

agreed to by key

stakeholders

(3)Safety netassistance is more

reflective of human

needs (incl.,housing, education,

health)

(2) Budget allocations for social protection programmes are oftenshort term

(3) Limited availability of reliable and up-to-date data on targetbeneficiaries

Target 2011:

(1) Relevant studies and ground work conducted on SSNet systemand formulation of policy recommendations for follow-up

(2) 5%increase in allocated budget for social safety nets over themedium term

(3) 10% increaseinsocial protection programmes with reliable andupdated data on target beneficiary groups

Target 2012(1) (a) A blue-print/roadmap for revamping the SSNet is completed

and submitted for government approval.. Framework will

include strategies and actions for improving the regulatory

framework, implementation, monev and reporting

mechanisms, grievance redress and target beneficiarysatisfaction assessments. (b) 20% of national social protection

programmes fulfill the basic criteria for effective, transparent

and accountable social protection programmes (including

targeting, implementation, monev and reporting mechanisms,grievance redress and target beneficiary satisfaction

assessments)

(2) 10%increase in allocated budget for social safety nets over themedium term

(3) 20% increaseinsocial protection programmes with reliable andupdated data on target beneficiary groups

Target 2013

(1) (a) Monitoring and feedback from strategy/roadmapimplementation. (b) 30% of national social protection

programmes fulfill the basic criteria for effective, transparentand accountable social protection programmes (including

targeting, implementation, monev and reporting mechanisms,

grievance redress and target beneficiary satisfaction

Facility for

TNP2K at the

Vice President

Office

3.G20 South-Southcooperation

for Growth

with resilience

focusing on

social

protection

128

78

88

Other Resources

8/8/2019 CPAP 2011-2015-DRAFT_18NOV

29/89

8/8/2019 CPAP 2011-2015-DRAFT_18NOV

30/89

28

and frameworks effective

Targets:

2011

Establishment of a CVMRS at the national level and delivery ofmonthly report alerts and policy inputs/advice for action follow-up

2012

Establishment of CVMRU in Aceh and delivery of monthly report

alerts and policy inputs/advice for action follow-up

2013Establishment of CVRMU in Papua and NTT and delivery of monthly

report alerts and policy inputs/advice for action follow-up

2014

Establishment of CVRMU in NTB and Riau and delivery of monthly

report alerts and policy inputs/advice for action follow-up

2015

Assessment and evaluation of the CVMRS and CVMRUs

Existing:

DPSP (PIP)

Proposed:

Development &

Institutionalizati

on of Crisis

Impact,

Vulnerability

Monitoring and

ResponseSystem

8/8/2019 CPAP 2011-2015-DRAFT_18NOV

31/89

8/8/2019 CPAP 2011-2015-DRAFT_18NOV

32/89

8/8/2019 CPAP 2011-2015-DRAFT_18NOV

33/89

31

from PIP

(Bappenas)

7. Socialinformation

awarenessraising for

the public

on MDG

achievemen

ts

1.3.2. OUTPUT:

National and sub

National capacitiesimproved to monitor,

evaluate, analyze and

report on MDG and

human development

Indicators:

(1)Existence of Technical and Institutional development frameworkfor HD/MDG reporting , monitoring and analysis involving GOIand non-government institutions at the national and sub-

national level, including particularly in UNPDF areas.

(2)Existence of University and CSO MDG and HD capacitydevelopment network led by a selected University in UNPDF

Projects:

Regular

8/8/2019 CPAP 2011-2015-DRAFT_18NOV

34/89

32

areas

(3)Existence of MDG HD Public Policy Centre at a renownedNational University that is capable of providing high quality

policy inputs to the government

(4)Number of MDG and HD Reports produced in collaborationbetween , GOI, CSOs, media and universitiesBaseline:

TBD by study

Target 2011:

(3)Technical and Institutional Development Framework forHuman Development and MDG Reporting, Monitoring and

Analysis is developed and implemented and # of GOI and non-GOI organizations at national and sub-national levels benefitting

from the technical support in 1 UNPDF area

(1)University and CSO capacity development network isestablished with clear CB plans

(2)MDG HD Public Policy Centre is established providing # of policyinputs to GOI, which have been discussed and endorsed

(3)2 Annual MDG & HD reportsTarget 2012(4)Technical and Institutional Development Framework for

Human Development and MDG Reporting, Monitoring and

Analysis is developed and implemented and # of GOI and non-

GOI organizations at national and sub-national levels benefittingfrom the technical support in 2 UNPDF areas

(1)University and CSO capacity development network isestablished with clear CB plans implemented in 20% UNPDF

areas

(2)MDG HD Public Policy Centre is established providing # of policyinputs to GOI

(3)4Annual MDG & HD reportsTarget 2013

Existing:

- 2010 NationalHuman

DevelopmentReport

- 2010 AcehHuman

Development

Report

Proposed:Technical and

InstitutionalDevelopment

Assistance

Framework for

Human

Developmentand MDG

Reporting,

Monitoring and

Analysis(including

piloting HDI new

approach.

113 73 55

Other Resources

1000 2500 250

8/8/2019 CPAP 2011-2015-DRAFT_18NOV

35/89

33

1. Technical and Institutional Development Framework for


Analysis is developed and implemented and # of GOI and non-GOI

organizations at national and sub-national levels benefitting from

the technical support in 3 UNPDF areas(2) University and CSO capacity development network is

established with clear CB plans implemented in 40% UNPDF areas

(3) MDG HD Public Policy Centre is established providing # of

policy inputs to GOI

(4) 6 Annual MDG & HD reportsTarget 2014(5)Technical and Institutional Development Framework for

Human Development and MDG Reporting, Monitoring andAnalysis is developed and implemented and # of GOI and non-

GOI organizations at national and sub-national levels benefitting

from the technical support in 3 UNPDF areas + 2 other selected

regions


areas

(2)MDG HD Public Policy Centre is established providing policyinputs to GOI

(3)8 Annual MDG & HD reportsTarget 2015(6)Technical and Institutional Development Framework for


Analysis is developed and implemented and # of GOI and non-

GOI organizations at national and sub-national levels benefitting

from the technical support in 3 UNPDF areas + 3 other selectedregions


areas

(2)MDG HD Public Policy Centre is established providing # of policyinputs to GOI

(3)10 Annual MDG & HD reports

8/8/2019 CPAP 2011-2015-DRAFT_18NOV

36/89

34

Output 1.3.3:

BAPPENAS and related

line ministries capacity

to establish and foster

global partnership fordevelopment

cooperation

strengthened

Indicators:

1.1.Availability of partnership strategies and mechanisms forpartnership engagement with different type of development

partners under various cooperation framework

1.2.Mechanism to support the implementation of PPP and CSR onthe acceleration achievement of MDGs

1.3.Availability of international cooperation framework betweenGOI and international partners under south-south, north-south,

and triangular cooperation modalities

1.4.Efficiency the capacity of multi-stakeholder in supporting thedevelopment cooperation framework

1.5.Adequate knowledge management system using integratedmechanism to capture various best practice and lesson learned

on development issues.

Baseline:

1.1Strategy exists for partnership with bilateral and multilateralpartners under the Aid effectiveness framework (The Jakarta

commitment).1.2No comprehensive partnership strategies within the national and

international development cooperation for private sectors and

CSOs.

1.3No comprehensive partnership strategies under the frameworkof South-south, north-south and triangular cooperation under

the framework of aid effectiveness.

1.4Capacity of multi stakeholder involve in the developmentcooperation is very limited.

1.5Knowledge management system has not been establishedTarget 2011:

1.1.An interim/transitional funding mechanism to support thedevelopment of a nationally-managed Trust Fund operational,with enhanced national systems and institutional capacities,

equipped by clear SOP and implementation guidelines1.2.Strategy and scheme for partnership with private sector

through PPP and CSR map identified

1.3.Mechanism under the Blue print of South-south Cooperationidentified

1.4.Capacity development scheme for development cooperation ofGOI established

BAPPENAS,

MOF, MOFA,

Private sectors,

CSOs

Ongoing:

TMDF-A4DE

225 159 192

8/8/2019 CPAP 2011-2015-DRAFT_18NOV

37/89

35

1.5.Knowledge management system initiate within theGovernment

Target 2012

1.6.Nationally-managed Trust Fund (A4DE) established andadministered by national entity

1.7.Mechanism (SOP and technical guidelines) for partnershipthrough PPP and CSR established and developed

1.8.Strategy for partnerships under the South-south cooperationframework; and Trust fund for aid effectiveness as mechanism

for partnerships under the aid-effectiveness framework

developed.1.9.GOI staffs capacity in their involvement in the development

cooperation improved1.10. Knowledge management system establishedTarget 2013:

1.1 Implementation and utilization of the operationalized andnationally-managed Trust Fund (A4DE) regularly and jointlymonitored & evaluated

1.2 Strategy and schemes for partnership with private sectorthrough PPP and CSR implemented especially relate to the

achievement of MDGs.1.3 Fully Implement the mechanism for South-south Cooperation

framework and developed further cooperation strategy.

1.4 Number of GOI staff including local government and privatesectors participate in the capacity development related todevelopment cooperation increase 20%

1.5 Knowledge management system well maintained and lessonlearned captured

Target 2014

1.1 Refinement of A4DE and lessons learned report published1.2 Partnership through PPP and CSR modalities has been monitor

and provides inputs for improvement.

1.3 Strategy for partnerships under the South-south cooperationframework monitor and revised

1.4 Multi stakeholder forum to improve capacity and dialogue ondevelopment cooperation established

8/8/2019 CPAP 2011-2015-DRAFT_18NOV

38/89

36

1.5 Knowledge management improved to facilitate the currentcondition

Target 2015

1.1

.1.2 Indonesia strategy on PPP and CSR on the achievement of

MDGs well established and lesson learned provided

1.3 Strategy for Indonesias role in international developmentforum and consolidated mechanism for partnership with UN

agencies in project fully developed.

1.4 Dialogue forum and capacity institution to improve capacityestablished

1.5 Knowledge management system has been fully established tofacilitate the lesson learned from cross cutting issues and multistakeholder.

Other resources

8/8/2019 CPAP 2011-2015-DRAFT_18NOV

39/89

37

Environment and Climate Change

EExxppeecctteeddUUNNDDAAFF:: Outcome 5: Strengthened climate change mitigation and adaptation and environmental sustainability measures in targeted vulnerable provinces, sectors and com

2.Environm

ent and

Climate

Change

2.1. OUTCOME:Responsible national

institutions and

relevant stakeholders

are more effective in

managing

environmentalresources andaddressing

environmental

pollution.

Indicators:

1. Proportion ofgovernment budget

allocated for natural

resources

management.

2.Nationaldeforestation rates.

3. %of Indonesian coralreef in very good

condition.4.# of prioritywatershed areas to

be improvably

managed.

5.% emissionreduction of POP

2.1.1. OUTPUTGovernment, private

sector and

Community-Based

Organization (CBO)

partners have coherent

and effective policyframeworks, actionplans, implementing

arrangement and

funding arrangement

to sustainably manage

terrestrial ecosystems.

Indicators:1. Progress made in establishing coherent policy framework with

action plan and budget

2. Functioning effectively of existing multi-stakeholder forumsand/or establishment of new forum in sustainably managing

forests and watersheds in targeted areas

3. Local/regional policy framework on promotingpublic/private/community partnership mechanisms for themanagement of forests and watersheds.

Baseline

1. Inadequate policy framework for forest and watershedmanagement with no comprehensive action plan and very

limited funding2. In 2009, most of existing multi-stakeholder watershed fora (43

fora) that are established at national and local levels have not

yet effectively functioned.

3. Initiatives on promoting public/private/community partnershipmechanisms for the management of forests and watersheds

have not yet well coordinated, recognized and

implemented/adopted at national and local levels.

Target 2011:1. Draft government regulation forWatershed Managementfinalized with community participation and discussed at national

and local government level.

2. Design programme of strengthening watershed fora that is raisedcommunity awareness developed.

3. Policy review and analysis on public/private/community

1.Ministry ofForestry

(Directorate

General of

Land

Rehabilitation

& SocialForestry; andDirectorate

General of

Forest

Protection &

Nature

Conservation),

2.BAPPENAS,3.State Ministry

of

Environment,

4.Ministry ofHome Affairs

5.Ministry ofAgriculture

Regular

79 49 55

Other Resources

8/8/2019 CPAP 2011-2015-DRAFT_18NOV

40/89

d h d l h d d d l b l d l bl d

8/8/2019 CPAP 2011-2015-DRAFT_18NOV

41/89

39


2. Annual forestdegradation: x

million ha per

annum.3. X % of Indonesiancoral reef in very

good condition.

4. By 2015 x or lessnumber of priority

watersheds are in

critical conditions.

5. X % of POPemission reductionat national level.

stakeholders partners

have coherent and

effective policy

frameworks and actionplans to sustainably

manage coastal and

marine ecosystems.

2. National Action Plan (NAP) and Strategic Action Plan (SAP) ontrans-boundary coastal and marines ecosystem management.

Baseline1. Outdated data on coastal and marine resources and inadequateunderstanding of trans-boundary problems.

2. There is no regional, national and local action plans on trans-boundary coastal and marines ecosystem management.

Target 2011

1. National database on coastal and marine resources and trans-boundary problems in one specific area developed.

2. Draft comprehensive scientific analysis on coastal and marineecosystem management developed.Target 2012

1. National database on coastal and marine resources and trans-boundary problems in two specific areas (cumulative) developed.

2. Draft of SAP on integrated ecosystem-based management anduse of the living coastal and marine resources developed.

Target 2013

1. National database on coastal and marine resources and trans-boundary problems updated and management information

and Fisheries,

2.Ministry ofHome Affairs,

3.BAPPENAS4.Ministry ofForeign Affairs

5.Localgovernment

75 49 82

Other Resources

EE tt dd UUNNDDAAFF O t St th d li t h iti ti d d t ti d i t l t i bilit i t t d l bl i t d

8/8/2019 CPAP 2011-2015-DRAFT_18NOV

42/89

40


system on coastal and marine resources designed.

2. SAP inter-governmentally signed and implemented, draft NAP onintegrated ecosystem-based management and use of the living

coastal and marine resources developed.

Target 2014

1. Management information system on coastal and marineresources developed.

2. The NAP is endorsed by the Ministry and adopted in the nationalpolicy frameworks.

Target 2015

1. Management information system on coastal and marineresources operational.2. The NAP implemented.

500 500 500

2.1.3. OUTPUT

Strategy and

guidelines developed

Indicators:

1. National Implementing Plan (NIP) on POPs reduction2. Implementation guidelines of NIP to effectively monitor POPs

Ministry of

Environment

and Ministry of

Regular

75 73 94

Other Resources

EExxppeecctteedd UUNNDDAAFF :: Outcome 5: Strengthened climate change mitigation and adaptation and environmental sustainability measures in targeted vulnerable provinces sectors and com

8/8/2019 CPAP 2011-2015-DRAFT_18NOV

43/89

41


for the pro

cpap 2011-2015-draft_18nov

Documents