cpd
DESCRIPTION
A case presentation and complete discussion on Cephalopelvic DisproportionTRANSCRIPT
OCTOBER 31, 2015
BY
PARIMALA VARSHA
RAJ MICHELLE
RAJKUMAR EUNICE
OUTLINE• HISTORY• REVIEW OF SYSTEMS• PHYSICAL EXAMINATION• SALIENT FEATURES• DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS• COURSE IN THE WARD• CASE DISCUSSION• RESEARCH
GENERAL DATA
CHIEF COMPLAINT
“ Labor pains”
HISTORY OF PRESENT ILLNESS
12hrs PTAPatient had sudden onset of irregular Abdominal pain radiating to the lower back Associated with brownish mucoid vaginal dischargeThere was no watery discharge noted.
Patient tolerated the symptoms and did not seek consultation
• The above symptoms persisted until 4hours prior to admission,
• The patient noticed increase in the frequency of the pain
• associated with bloody vaginal discharge soaking 1 pad.
• This prompted her to seek consultation in this institution. Admission was advised.
• Hence complied
OBSTETRICAL HISTORY G1P0
PREGNANCY ORDER
PREGNANCY OUTCOME
YEAR GESTATION COMPLETED
SEX BIRTH WEIGHT
PRESENT STATUS
G1 PRESENT PREGNANCY
OBSTETRICAL HISTORY
LMP : Dec 26, 2014
PMP :Nov 25,2014
EDC : Oct 2,2015
AOG : 40 1/7 weeks Prenatal check up: 1st check up-
February 2015( 6 weeks AOG) followed by regular monthly pre-natal visits
1ST Ultrasound: March, 2015 (12 weeks AOG)- could not recall EDD.
2nd Ultrasound: October 1, 2015 (39 3/7 weeks AOG)
EDD – Sep 28,2015
Date of Quickening : 5th month AOG Total weight gain : 9kgMedication: Multivitamins, FeSO4
GYNECOLOGY HISTORY
PAST MEDICAL HISTORY
• (-) food or drug allergies• No maintenance medications• (-) TB exposure• (-)hypertension• (-) thyroid disorders• (-) Diabetes Mellitus
FAMILY HISTORY
• (-) hypertension• (+) diabetes Mellitus• (-) cancer• (-) tuberculosis• (-) cardiovascular disease• (-) renal disease
PERSONAL/SOCIAL HISTORY
• College student• (-) Smoker• (-) Alcohol/Beverage Drinker• Eats 3-5x meal/day• (-) Exercise
REVIEW OF SYSTEMS
General: (+) Weight change, (-) Fatigue, (-) Anorexia, (-) WeaknessSkin: (-) Rashes, (-) ItchinessHead: (-) headacheEye: (-) blurring of vision, itching, redness or painEar: (-) deafness, pain or discharge
REVIEW OF SYSTEM
Nose: (-) epistaxis, obstruction, dischargesMouth: (-) bleeding gums, (-) Dental carries, (-) SoresThroat: midline tracheaNeck: (-) stiffness or limitation in motionsPulmonary System: (-) cough, (-) dyspnea, (-) asthma
Cardiac: (-) palpitations, (-) chest pain Abdomen: (+)Hypogastric pain, (-)vomiting, (-)nausea, (-)epigastric painGenito-urinary: (-) Dysuria (-) polyuria
PHYSICAL EXAMINATION
VITAL SIGNS •T = 36.2•PR = 100bpm•RR= 20cpm•BP=120/80mmHg•Weight=76.4kg/ 67.4•Weight gain in pregnancy: •Height=150 cm• BMI=34(obese 1)
HEENT•Normocephalic, fine smooth hair texture,•Pink palpebral conjunctivae, no ear or eye discharge, nasal septum midline, no tonsillar swelling.
CHEST•Heart: Adynamic precordium, Normal heart rate and rhythm, negative murmurs•Lungs : ECE, clear breath sounds, no crackles
Abdomen •Globular, gravid uterus•Leopold’s Manuver•L1 = breech •L2 = fetal back at maternal left side•L3 = Cephalic, floating
• Fundic height = 37 cm• FHT = 155-160 bpm• EFW= 4030gm
Pelvic Examination
External Genitalia and Vagina: grossly normalInternal Examination:•Dilatation: 5cm•Effacement: 60%•Cephalic•Station: -3•Membranes: Intact UC: moderate to strong; occuring every 2-3 minutes; lasting for 50-60 secs
Pelvic Examination
Clinical Pelvimetry:• Inlet : The sacral promontory is not reached
at 11.5 cms .
• Midplane : Curved sacrum, Side walls Convergent , Non prominent Ischial spines.
• Outlet : Intertuberous diameter is > 8 cm
Extremeties •Good range of motion •No deformities noted•(-) edema, clubbing or cyanosis noted•Capillary refill time: <2 secs
Salient Features
History Physical Exam
18 y.o G1P0 40 1/7 wks AOG LMP: Dec 26, 2014 Family history of DM BMI = 34 (obese)
Convergent Side walls Internal Examination:- cervical dilatation: 5 cm- cervical effacement: 60%- cervical position: midline- Cephalic- station -3- intact membranes FH=37 cms FHT= 134 bpm EFW= 4 kg
Multifetal Pregnancy
RULE IN RULE OUT
Large fundic height (37cm) One fetus palpated on leopoldsOne heart beat auscultated(-) Family history of multifetal pregnancy
Polyhydramnios
RULE IN RULE OUT
Large fundic height (37cm) Normal AFI = 12.4 cm
Gynecologic Tumor with Pregnancy
RULE IN RULE OUT
Large fundic height (37cm) (-) vaginal bleeding/ spotting(-) abdominal pain(-) history of gynecologic illness
Admitting Impression
G1P0 Pregnancy Uterine 40 1/7 weeks AOG by LMP, Cephalic in Active Phase of
Labor, T/C Fetal Macrosomia
PLAN
• Admit• NPO• Trial of Labor• FHT/UC monitoring• Labs• Baseline IPM• CS if with fetomaternal
Indication
Laboratory1st Hospital Day
CBC
WBC Count H 21.23 5-10
Hemoglobin 116.0 115.0-155.0
Hematocrit 0.35 0.36-0.48
RBC Count 4.22 4.20-6.10
Neutrophil 89 55.00-75.00
Lymphocytes L 7.0 20-35
Monocytes 4 2-10
Eosinophils
Basophils
Platelets 322 150-400
MCV 83.40 79.40-94.80
MCH 27.5 25.60-32.20
MCHC 33.0 32.20-35.50
Urinalysis Reference Values
Protein Trace Negative
pH 6.0
Specific Gravity 1.023
Glucose Negative
RBC 16 0-28
WBC 60 0-27
Epithelial Cells 8.0 0-7
Bacteria 8.0 0-111
Nitrite negative negative
Laboratory1st Hospital Day
Laboratory1st Hospital Day
Blood Type : O Positive
HBsAg Qualitative : NonReactive
Abdominal ultrasound
• Single live intrauterine pregnancy in cephalic presentation with composite gestational age of 40 weeks
• AFI = 12.4 normohydramnios• EDC by ultrasound 28 september• Fetal genitalia apears male• Estimated fetal weight = 4.137 kg
Baseline FHT: 125-130 bpmVariablity: moderateAcceleration: (+)Deceleration: absentUC: moderate to strong irregular Uterine Contraction
Course In The Ward
BP/FHT UC IE REMARKS
5:07 PM•BP: 120/80•FH: 37 cm•EFW: 4060 g•FHT 135 bpm
Moderate to strong irregular contraction
• 5 cm• 60% effaced• Cephalic• IBOW• station -3
• Vaginal delivery• IPM• CS if with
fetomaternal indication
• FHT/UC monitoring
8.00 PM•BP: 120/80•FHT: 145 bpm
Moderate to strong irregular contraction
• 7 cm• 60% effaced• Cephalic• IBOW• station -3
• FHT/UC monitoring
12.15 AM•BP: 115/80•FHT: 140 bpm
Moderate to strong irregular contraction
• 7 cm• 60% effaced• Cephalic• IBOW• station -3
• STAT CS for arrest in cervical dilatation secondary to CPD
Friedman's Curve
Intraoperative Findings
Primary Low Segment Transverse Cesarean Section
Intraoperative Findings:
• The gravid uterus was enlarged to the appropriate gestational size
• The amniotic fluid was moderate and clear
Intraoperative Findings
• Extracted a live baby boy, term with a ballard score of 40 weeks and apgar score of 8,9
• The placenta was implanted anteroposteriorly
• Right and left ovaries were grossly normal
• Estimated blood loss of 200cc
Fetal Outcome• Apgar score : 8, 9• Ballard score: 40
weeks• Birth Weight : 3.648
kg• Length : 53 cm• Head Circumference :
34 cm• Chest :36 cm
Final Diagnosis
1st Post Op Day1st Post Op Day
Subjective Objective Assessment Plan
(-) abdominal pain(+) minimal vaginal bleeding (-) nausea or vomiting(-) fever(-) bowel movement(-) FlatusLying comfortable supineNo other complaints
Stable vital signsPink palpebral conjuctivaeAnicteric scleraeClear breath soundEqual chest expansionAdynamic percordiumFull pulses, CRT < 2 secsClear adequate urine outputDry well coaptated operative site
G1P1(1001) Pregnancy Uterine delivered Term Cephalic Live Baby Boy by Primary Low Segment Transverse Cesarean Section for Arrest in Cervical Dilatation secondary to Cephalopelvic Disproportion
IVF: = D5LR 1L + 10 units Oxytocin AT 120 c/hrMeds givenVital signs monitored
2nd Post Op Day1st Post Op Day
Subjective Objective Assessment Plan
(+) minimal vaginal bleeding (-) nausea or vomiting(-) fever(+) bowel movement(+) FlatusVoiding freelyLying comfortable supineNo other complaints
Stable vital signsPink palpebral conjuctivaeAnicteric scleraeClear breath soundEqual chest expansionAdynamic percordiumFull pulses, CRT < 2 secsClear adequate urine outputDry well coaptated operative site
G1P1(1001) Pregnancy Uterine delivered Term Cephalic Live Baby Boy by Primary Low Segment Transverse Cesarean Section for Arrest in Cervical Dilatation secondary to Cephalopelvic Disproportion
Dressing changed
Meds given
Vital signs monitored
3rd Post Op Day1st Post Op Day
Subjective Objective Assessment Plan
Lying comfortable supine
No subjective complaints
Stable vital signsPink palpebral conjuctivaeAnicteric scleraeClear breath soundEqual chest expansionAdynamic percordiumFull pulses, CRT < 2 secsClear adequate urine output
G1P1(1001) Pregnancy Uterine delivered Term Cephalic Live Baby Boy by Primary Low Segment Transverse Cesarean Section for Arrest in Cervical Dilatation secondary to Cephalopelvic Disproportion
Meds given
Vital signs monitored
MGH
4 Factors
Dystocia is the consequence of 3 abnormalities that Dystocia is the consequence of 3 abnormalities that may exist singly or in combinationmay exist singly or in combination
1-Abnormalities of the powers uterine contractility maternal expulsive forces2-Abnormalities of the passage maternal boney pelvis the soft tissue of the reproductive tract3-Abnormalities of the passenger presentation position development of the fetus size
Abnormalities of the Passage• Pelvic Brim• Diagonal Conjugate• Obstetrical Conjugate• Sacrum• Side walls• Ischial Spines• Interspinous diameter• Sacrosciatic notch
INLETINLET
THE CAVITYTHE CAVITY
• Subpubic Angle• Bituberous diameter• Anteroposterior Diameter
OUTLETOUTLET
STAGES OF LABOR
FIRST STAGE
SECOND STAGE
Latent phaseActive phase
Acceleration Phase Decceleration Phase
THIRD STAGE
Phase Of Max Slope
Preparatory division
Pelvic divisionDilatation
division
LABOUR TIME FRAMESPhases/ Stages of labourPhases/ Stages of labour NulliparousNulliparous MultiparousMultiparous
Latent Latent phasephase
Mean timeMean time 6.4 h6.4 h 4.8 h4.8 h
Longest Longest 20.1 h 20.1 h 13.6 h13.6 h
Active Active phasephase
Mean rateMean rate 3 cm/h3 cm/h 5.7cm/h 5.7cm/h
Slowest Slowest 1.2cm/h1.2cm/h 1.5cm/h1.5cm/h
22ndnd Stage Stage Mean timeMean time 1.1 h1.1 h 0.4 h0.4 h
Longest Longest 2.9 h2.9 h 1.1 h1.1 h
SHOULD NOT BE DIAGNOSED BEFORE ACTIVE STAGE OF LABOR
ABNORMAL LABOR
Abnormal labor patterns can be divided into two general types
– Protraction – Arrest
NULLIPARA MULTIPARA
Protraction <1.2 cm/hr (dilation)
<1.5 cm/hr (dilation)
< 1cm/hr(descent)
< 2cm/hr(descent)
Arrest
Arrest Of Dilation 2 hours with no cervical change
Arrest in Descent 1 hour without fetal descent
ABNORMAL LABOR
Abnormal Labor Patterns, Diagnostic Criteria and Methods of Treatment
Labor Patterns
Diagnostic Criteria Preferred Treatment
Exceptional TreatmentNullipara Multipara
Prolonged Latent Phase
> 20 hours
>14 hours
Bed rest Oxytocin or Cesarean
Delivery for urgent
problems
Abnormal Labor Patterns, Diagnostic Criteria and Methods of Treatment
Protraction Disorders
Diagnostic Criteria Preferred Treatment
Exceptional TreatmentNullipara Multipara
Protracted Active Phase
dilation
<1.2 cm/hr
<1.5 cm/hr Expectant and
SupportCesarean for
CPD
Protracted Descent
<1 cm/hr <2 cm/hr
Abnormal Labor Patterns, Diagnostic Criteria and Methods of Treatment
Arrest Disorders Diagnostic Criteria Preferred Treatment
Exceptional TreatmentNullipara Multipara
Prolonged Deceleration Phase
> 3 hrs > 1 hr
Evaluate for CPD:CPD: cesarean
No CPD: oxytocin
Rest if exhaustedCesarean Delivery
Secondary arrest of Dilation
> 2 hrs > 2 hrs
Arrest of Descent > 1 hr > 1 hr
Failure of Descent No descent in deceleration phase
or second stage
Factors Influencing the First Stage of Labor
• Uterine contractions• Cervical Resistance• Forward pressure exerted by the
leading fetal part
ARREST IN DILATATION SECONDARY TO CEPHALOPELVIC
DISPROPORTION
The fetal head engages in the occipitotransverse position and, if it is well flexed and asynclitic, will undergo rotation in the mid-cavity to the direct occipitoanterior position.
Secondary Arrest in Dilation
Cephalopelvic Disproportion
1. Absolute Disproportion: There is no possibility of normal Delivery even if the progress of Labor is completely normal
2. Relative Disproportion: This means that the baby is large but would pass through the Pelvis if the Mechanisms of Labor function correctly
CPD tests
• Pinard’s Method• Muller-Kerr’s Method
MANAGEMENT OF CPD
• Mild disproportion: vaginal delivery• Moderate: trial labor, if failed then
cesarean section• Marked: Cesarean Section
Why Trial of Labor?
It is a clinical test for the factors that cannot be determined beofre the start of labor:•Efficiency of uterine contraction•Moulding of the head•Yeilding of the pelvis and soft tissue
Suitable Cases
• Young primigravida of good health
• Moderate disproprtion• Vertex Presentation• No outlet contractions• Average sized baby
Termination of Trial Of Labor• Vaginal delivery:
– either spontaneously or by forceps if the head is engaged.
• Caesarean section if:– failed trial of labour i.e. the head did not
engage or– complications occur during trial as foetal
distress or prolapsed pulsating cord before full cervical dilatation.
Arrest Disorders Diagnostic Criteria
Preferred Treatment
Exceptional Treatment
Nullipara
Multipara
Prolonged Deceleration
Phase
> 3 hrs > 1 hr
Evaluate for CPD:CPD: cesarean
No CPD: oxytocin
Rest if exhaustedCesarean Delivery
Secondary arrest of Dilation
> 2 hrs > 2 hrs
Arrest of Descent
> 1 hr > 1 hr
Failure of Descent
No descent in deceleration
phase or second stage
Management
Short stature as an independent risk factor for cephalopelvic disproportion in a country of relatively small-sized mothersMaternal-Fetal MedicineArchives of Gynecology and ObstetricsJune 2012, Volume 285, Issue 6, pp 1513-1516
Objective•To clarify the relationship between maternal height and cesarean rate due to cephalopelvic disproportion (CPD) in singleton pregnancies among ethnic groups of relatively short stature.Methods•A retrospective cohort study was performed on Thai singleton pregnancies at gestational age of more than 34 weeks. Logistic regression analysis was performed to correlate the maternal height and a risk for CPD. The short stature was defined by a cut-off value at 5th percentile ranking. Odds ratio for CPD was determined.
Results•Considering cut-off value of 145 cm, short stature was significantly associated with higher rate of CPD with odds ratio of 2.4 (95% CI 1.8–3.0). The odds = exp(4.048 − 0.042 × Ht). After control of other variables, the relationship between maternal height and rate of CPD was still high.
CONCLUSION•Mothers with short stature were significantly correlated with a higher rate of CPD, even after control of birth weight, parity and type of attendance. Clinical points could be drawn from this study including •(1) definition of short statue must be developed for particular geographic or ethnic groups. In Thai population, using 145 cm as a cut-off value, odds of CPD is 2.4; •(2) Probability of CPD may be estimated by maternal height as a single variable or multiple variables using logistic regression equations.
Thank You..!