cranberry fruitworm in b.c. · 2018. 3. 9. · july 2 july 9 july 16 july 23 july 30 aug 6 aug 13...

40
Cranberry Fruitworm in B.C. Tracy Hueppelsheuser British Columbia Ministry of Agriculture BC Cranberry Congress, Feb. 11, 2015 1

Upload: others

Post on 16-Feb-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Cranberry Fruitworm in B.C.

    Tracy Hueppelsheuser

    British Columbia Ministry of Agriculture

    BC Cranberry Congress, Feb. 11, 2015

    1

  • Acknowledgements

    This project was funded in part by the BC Ministry of Agriculture and Agriculture

    and Agri-Food Canada through Growing Forward 2, a federal-provincial-

    territorial initiative.

    Additional support was provided by:

    Cranberry and Blueberry Grower Cooperators

    B.C. Blueberry Council

    B.C. Cranberry Marketing Commission

    B.C. Cranberry Growers Association

    E.S. Cropconsult Ltd.

    Ocean Spray Cranberries

  • Cranberry Fruitworm (Acrobasis vaccinii, Lepidoptera: Pyralidae)

    • Internal fruit feeding caterpillar, native to North America.

    • Infests blueberry and cranberry in eastern North America.

    • Moths detected for the first time in pheromone traps in a few BC cranberry fields in 2011.

    3

  • Pest Biology:

    • Major Hosts: cranberry, blueberry.

    • Wild and minor crop hosts recorded:

    – Wild vaccinium

    – One generation per year.

    4

    Larvae Moth

    Eggs

    Pupae

    4 life stages:

  • Life cycle:

    • Moth emerges in summer (June-July) and lays eggs on green fruit (July).

    • Larvae hatch and burrow into developing fruit (July-Aug).

    • Larvae will infest 3-6 fruit before exiting and searching for an overwintering site (August).

    • Over-winters as larvae/pre-pupae in a silken structure in soil.

    • Pupates in spring/early summer.

    5

  • Cranberry Fruitworm Moth

    6

    Grey-brown moth with white triangles on wings; hind triangles with two dots each. Medium size moths, 15 mm wingspan.

    Note: there are moths that look similar; these tend to occur later, i.e. in August. Sometimes girdler moths will get into fruitworm traps.

  • Cranberry Fruitworm Eggs • Very small (1mm). Cannot identify without a lens.

    • Laid singly or a few overlapping on the fruit calyx of green fruit.

    7

  • Newly hatched larvae in calyx

    8

    Empty egg shell

  • Bore hole in stem end from tiny new larvae entering fruit. Unique to this pest.

    9

  • 10

    • Light green/brown head

    • Body is green.

    • Grows to ~1 cm

    Cranberry fruitworm larvae

  • Larvae exit holes and frass in cranberry fruit

    11

    Looks very different from Fireworm, which mostly feeds on foliage, and sometimes makes large irregular holes in fruits.

  • Damage to cranberry fruit: ‘raisins’

    12

  • 13

    Shriveled fruit in field

    Heidi van Dokkumburg, ES Cropconsult Ltd.

  • Area-wide monitoring in 2014 3rd year of a multi-year project

    1. Wing traps and commercial cranberry fruitworm pheromone

    – 97 cranberry fields (32 farms) and

    – 28 blueberry fields (28 farms)

    – checked weekly, and number of moths recorded.

    – traps placed near row ends, beside mixed natural trees and shrubs.

    2. Fruit were collected during ripening and near harvest to look for presence of fruitworm.

    14

  • Moth catches Blueberry 2012 & 2013

    15

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    June 4

    June 11

    June 18

    June 22

    June 29

    July 2

    July 9

    July 16

    July 23

    July 30

    Aug 6

    Aug 13

    Aug 20

    Aug 27

    Nu

    mb

    er

    of

    mo

    ths

    ca

    ug

    ht

    pe

    r w

    ee

    k

    Very few moths were caught in traps in blueberry fields (9 total moths in 2012, shown here). In 2013, only 1 moth was confirmed (June 28) in a blueberry field beside a cranberry field known to have fruitworm (Richmond).

  • 16

    0

    0.05

    0.1

    0.15

    0.2

    0.25

    0.3

    0.35

    # cr

    anb

    err

    y fr

    uit

    wo

    rm m

    oth

    s ca

    ugh

    t /

    trap

    # Cranberry fruitworm moths/trap/week in 28 blueberry fields (60 traps), 2014

    19 moths total in 60 traps in peak week, July 18:

    still really low in blueberry fields

  • # Cranberry fruitworm moths caught in blueberry fields by region, 2014

    17

    Region # traps Total # moths caught

    June 13 to July 11

    Richmond 4 25

    Ladner 6 3

    East Delta 4 3

    Surrey 6 0

    Langley 6 0

    Abbotsford 6 0

    Matsqui 6 0

    PoCo/ Pitt Meadows 6 0

    Pitt Meadows/ Maple Ridge 6 1

    Chilliwack/ Rosedale 6 0

    TOTAL MOTHS CAUGHT 29

  • # cranberry fruitworm moths caught/ trap/ week in cranberry fields

    18

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    Jun

    e 2

    Jun

    e 9

    Jun

    e 1

    6

    Jun

    e 2

    3

    Jun

    e 3

    0

    July 7

    July 1

    4

    July 2

    1

    July 2

    8

    Au

    gust 4

    Au

    gust 1

    1

    Au

    gust 1

    8

    Au

    gust 2

    5

    # M

    oth

    s/p

    er

    trap

    2014

    2013

    2012

    First moth 2014: June 9, 1 week earlier than 2013. 9 weeks of catch in 2014: June 9- Aug 4. Peak flight: June 30-July 14.

  • # moths total per week in cranberry (97 traps)

    19

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    Jun

    e 2

    Jun

    e 9

    Jun

    e 1

    6

    Jun

    e 23

    Jun

    e 30

    July 7

    July 1

    4

    July 2

    1

    July 2

    8

    Au

    gust 4

    Au

    gust 1

    1

    Au

    gust 1

    8

    Au

    gust 2

    5

    Tota

    l Mo

    ths

    2014 2013 2012

    212 moths

    6 times more moths than in blueberry fields. Number increases each year

  • 20

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70 S.

    Ric

    hm

    on

    d 1

    -1

    S. R

    ich

    mo

    nd

    1-3

    S.

    Ric

    hm

    on

    d 2

    S.

    Ric

    hm

    on

    d 4

    -2

    S.R

    ich

    mo

    nd

    4-4

    S.

    Ric

    hm

    on

    d 3

    -2

    S. R

    ich

    mo

    nd

    3-

    4

    Sou

    th R

    ich

    mo

    nd

    5-3

    N

    . Ric

    hm

    on

    d 8

    -1

    N. R

    ich

    mo

    nd

    5-3

    N

    . Ric

    hm

    on

    d 5

    -7

    N. R

    ich

    mo

    nd

    5-1

    1

    N. R

    ich

    mo

    nd

    4-2

    N

    . Ric

    hm

    on

    d 6

    -1

    N. R

    ich

    mo

    nd

    7-3

    N

    . Ric

    hm

    on

    d 1

    -1

    N. R

    ich

    mo

    nd

    1-5

    N

    . Ric

    hm

    on

    d 4

    -4

    N. R

    ich

    mo

    nd

    4-6

    E.

    Del

    ta 1

    -4

    Surr

    ey 1

    -4

    E. D

    elta

    2-2

    W

    .Del

    ta 2

    -2

    W. D

    elta

    2-4

    W

    . Del

    ta 3

    -1

    W. D

    elta

    3-3

    W

    . Del

    ta 3

    -5

    W. D

    elta

    3-7

    W

    . Del

    ta 1

    -1

    W. D

    elta

    1-4

    W

    . Del

    ta 1

    - 6

    W

    . Del

    ta 1

    -E

    Lan

    gley

    1

    Lan

    gley

    2

    Lan

    gley

    2

    Lan

    gley

    3

    Lan

    gley

    3

    Lan

    gley

    4

    Lan

    gley

    6

    Lan

    gley

    7

    Lan

    gley

    9

    Ch

    iliw

    ack

    1-1

    P

    MM

    R2

    -1

    PM

    MR

    3-1

    P

    MM

    R 1

    -1

    PM

    MR

    1-3

    P

    MM

    R 1

    -5

    PM

    MR

    1-7

    P

    MM

    R 1

    -9

    Total trap catch per trap over the season, cranberry fields (June 2 – August 25, 2014)

  • Comparing Cranberry Regions: 2012-2013

    Moths:

    • East Delta

    • West Delta

    • South Richmond

    • North Richmond (only 1 moth)

    NO Moths:

    • Surrey

    • Langley

    • Pitt Meadows/Maple Ridge

    • Chilliwack

    21

    Same regions in 2012 and 2013

  • Comparing Cranberry Regions:

    Moths:

    • East Delta

    • West Delta

    • South Richmond

    • North Richmond

    NO Moths:

    • Surrey

    • Langley

    • Pitt Meadows/Maple Ridge

    • Chilliwack

    22

    2014: Moths now found in: Pitt Meadows/Maple Ridge,

    More in North Richmond

  • Per cent of cranberry fields per region with moths

    23

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    % o

    f m

    oth

    po

    siti

    ve f

    ield

    s

    2013

    2014

  • Moth catches Summary: • First moth catch: can vary from year to year

    • Peak moth catch: around July 1

    • More moths caught each year.

    • Regional differences exist

    Trapping is important to see these annual fluctuations

    24

  • Egg searches once moths are caught: • In fields with moth catches (8-12 fields/week), 200 random

    green fruit per field were collected until moth flight ended (June-August).

    • Fruit was inspected with a microscope.

    25

    We found no eggs and no damage in blueberry fields.

  • Eggs on fruit 2014

    • First eggs found: June 27 in West Delta

    • 11 days after first moths were detected in this field.

    • Eggs were found: June 27—Aug 4

    • Most eggs during week of June 30

    • Peak eggs occurred early in moth flight

    26

  • Moth catches and egg counts per week in cranberry fields

    27

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    Jun

    e 2

    Jun

    e 9

    Jun

    e 1

    6

    Jun

    e 2

    3

    Jun

    e 3

    0

    July 7

    July 1

    4

    July 2

    1

    July 2

    8

    Au

    gust 4

    Au

    gust 1

    1

    Au

    gust 1

    8

    Au

    gust 2

    5

    Tota

    l egg

    s

    Tota

    l Mo

    ths

    2014 moth totals

    2014 egg totals

    Peaks are close for both eggs and moths

  • Eggs and damage assessments from 19 moth-positive fields, 2014

    28

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    Pe

    r ce

    nt

    be

    rrie

    s w

    ith

    dam

    age

    % of berries with eggs

    % of berries with live larvae

    % of berries with bore holes

    % of dead larvae

  • 29

    • First bore holes (larvae burrowing into fruit): July 7

    • Sprays were done from week of June 25 to July 28, most fields 2 applications

    • Most larvae were dead July 7-28.

    • After July 28, most larvae were live (no more sprays after July 28)

    Is a third spray needed?

  • Sprayed cranberry fields with live or dead larvae

    30

    0

    0.05

    0.1

    0.15

    0.2

    0.25

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    % o

    f b

    err

    ies

    wit

    h la

    rvae

    % o

    f fi

    eld

    s sp

    raye

    d

    Percentage of postive fields sprayed

    Percentage of berries containing dead lavae

    Percentage of berries containing live larvae

  • Fruit damage: September 2014 • 40% of fields (with moths) checked had fruit damage

    (8/20 fields)

    • Variable damage level detected: 1/400 fruit to 1/10 fruit (0.21 – 11 %)

    • 3 fields out of 20 (15%) had significant (6-11%) damaged fruit. Similar to 2013.

    • >22 moths over the season (June-August) were caught in each of the ‘high’ fields.

    • No fields with only 1 moth had damage.

    • No damage seen in fruit-sampled fields with no moth catches

    31

  • 32

    Field

    #

    Field Total

    Trap

    catches

    Total eggs % of berry

    damage (Week of

    September 5)

    % of berry damage

    (Week of September

    19)

    1 W. Delta 1-4 2 0 0 0

    2 W. Delta 1-5 2 0 0 0.27

    4 W. Delta 2-3 3 0 0 1.38

    6 W. Delta 3-2 38 -- 1.34 0.35

    7 W. Delta 3-4 22 3 3.33 5.71

    5 E. Delta 1-4 1 0 0 0

    3 E. Delta 2-2 2 0 0 0.2

    8 N. Richmond 6-2 1 0 0 0

    9 N. Richmond 4-3 2 0 0 0

    10 N. Richmond 2-1 1 0 0 0

    11 N. Richmond 5-2 1 0 0 0

    12 N. Richmond 1-4 1 0 0 0

    13 S. Richmond 4-2 27 3 3 3.5

    14 S. Richmond 2 51 20 10.73 6.71

    15 S. Richmond 5-3 20 13 0 0

    16 N. Richmond 8-1 1 1 0 0

    17 S. Richmond 3-1 56 9 7.8 1.65

    18 S. Richmond 1-1 29 4 1.17 0

    19 PMMR 1-3 1 0 0 0

    20 PMMR 2-2 5 1 0.21 0

    Rip

    e b

    erry dam

    age assessmen

    ts in Sep

    temb

    er 2

    01

    4 fro

    m cran

    berry fru

    itwo

    rm-p

    ositive field

    s in

    20

    14

    .

  • Insecticide management • Target is the egg and young larvae before they bore

    into the fruit.

    • Apply during egg laying, when 1 egg is found in 100 berries checked (per 2 acres); – Egg laying begins within a few days after moth catches

    begin.

    • Second application about 10 days after the first. – Third spray needed?

    • Products are available for use in B.C. Check with your packer to confirm acceptability: – Intrepid, Altachor,

    – Suppression ONLY: Success, Entrust (organic)

    – Delegate (for other caterpillars species).

    33

  • Table From: http://umaine.edu/cranberries/grower-services/insects/cranberry-fruitworm/

    34

    Table Recommended (for all practices) to Determine Necessity of Additional

    Spraying for Cranberry Fruitworm:

    Number of Acres Number of Berries

    Checked

    Number of Viable Eggs Needed to

    Trigger Spray during profitable

    berry prices

    Number of Viable Eggs Needed to

    Trigger Spray during very low berry prices

    (< $0.30 per lb.)

    0-5 200-250 1 2

    6 or 7 251-350 2 4

    8 or 9 351-450 3 6

    10 or 11 451-550 4 8

    for each additional 2 acres

    add 100 berries add 1 egg double the number determined at left

    A Reference for # of fruit to collect:

  • Timing of sprays

    • Eastern spray recommendations relate to crop stage (i.e. 50% out of bloom).

    However,

    • B.C. sprays do not need to occur until post bloom

    • Spray dates may vary each year, based on moth flight and egg detections

    – (which is driven by temperature)

    35

  • Degree days, predictive model

    • MSU model seems to be accurate for Richmond, 2014, but may not be for all regions or all years. More years of comparisons needs to be made.

    • In new regions where the pest is only detected at low levels, the model may not be very accurate, i.e. Pitt Meadows.

    36

  • Other management tools

    • Biological control: some native parasitoids in eastern North America, but not enough to keep below damage thresholds. Not sure of levels in BC or western regions.

    – We have not confirmed parasitoids in BC.

    • Cultural: 30 day spring re-flood before end of dormancy (‘late water’); not practiced in all regions.

    37

  • 38

    • For blueberries, there was no damage to fruit reported and no eggs or damage recorded during our trials.

    • In BC, so far, Cranberry Fruitworm seems limited to Cranberries.

    • Will continue monitoring and management project survey in 2015 in both crops.

    If it was in blueberry, this is what the damage would look like: lots of frass and webbing.

    B. Cline, North Carolina J.A. Payne, USDA/ARS

  • More information on Cranberry Fruitworm in cranberries:

    University of Maine: http://umaine.edu/cranberries/grower-services/insects/cranberry-fruitworm/

    Long Beach, Washington State University: http://longbeach.wsu.edu/cranberries/documents/cranberryfruitwormwisconsin.pdf

    Michigan State University model:

    Isaacs, R.and C.G. Salazar. 2009. Using MSU’s cranberry fruitworm degree day model. Michigan http://msue.anr.msu.edu/news/using_msus_cranberry_fruitworm_degree_day_model

    . 39

    Reminder: Timing for pest life stages is a bit later in BC than in eastern cranberry growing regions.

    http://umaine.edu/cranberries/grower-services/insects/cranberry-fruitworm/http://umaine.edu/cranberries/grower-services/insects/cranberry-fruitworm/http://umaine.edu/cranberries/grower-services/insects/cranberry-fruitworm/http://umaine.edu/cranberries/grower-services/insects/cranberry-fruitworm/http://umaine.edu/cranberries/grower-services/insects/cranberry-fruitworm/http://longbeach.wsu.edu/cranberries/documents/cranberryfruitwormwisconsin.pdfhttp://longbeach.wsu.edu/cranberries/documents/cranberryfruitwormwisconsin.pdfhttp://msue.anr.msu.edu/news/using_msus_cranberry_fruitworm_degree_day_modelhttp://msue.anr.msu.edu/news/using_msus_cranberry_fruitworm_degree_day_modelhttp://msue.anr.msu.edu/news/using_msus_cranberry_fruitworm_degree_day_modelhttp://msue.anr.msu.edu/news/using_msus_cranberry_fruitworm_degree_day_model

  • Next steps

    1. Continue outreach and information sharing with growers, consultants, and packers.

    2. Area wide trapping. Monitor in some new fields and areas if possible, in cranberries and blueberries.

    3. Continue to track fruit damage in fields.

    4. Refine monitoring and decision making in future years, as we gain experience and generate data.

    40