creating the 1st eu-wide guarantee of origin for green ... · wp2: definition of ... tÜv sÜd is...
TRANSCRIPT
Project supported by the FCH JU
CertifHyCreating the 1st EU-wide Guarantee of Origin forGreen Hydrogen
Webinar12th June
09:30 – 11:30Wouter Vanhoudt (CertifHy Project Leader/
Director Europe Hinicio)
www.certifhy.eu #CertifHy
Agenda
Introduction to GO schemes
CertifHy Phase 1:• Definition of Green hydrogen • GO scheme
Business Models for Green H2 GO’s
CertifHy Phase 2
Appendix: Analysis of pathways leading to Green H2 production
2
Guarantee of Origin (GO) scheme for Electricity has allowed Electricity Suppliers to sell renewable electricity (RE) contracts to households and provide evidence of RE consumption to their customers.
3
In Flanders, consumers can checkvia the regulator their electricityconsumption to be renewable (asthe electricity supplier cancelledGOs):http://www.vreg.be/nl/controleren-hoe-groen-uw-stroom-groencheck
IDENTITY PRESERVEDSustainable palm oil from a single identifiable certified source is kept separately from ordinary palm oil throughout supply chain.
Dif
fere
nt s
chem
es e
xist
for
su
stai
nabl
epa
lm o
il
4
SEGREGATEDSustainable palm oil from different certified sources is kept separate from ordinary palm oil throughout supply chain
Dif
fere
nt s
chem
es e
xist
for
su
stai
nabl
epa
lm o
il
5
MASS BALANCESustainable palm oil from certified sources is mixed with ordinary palm oil throughout supply chain.
Source:http://www.rspo.org/
Dif
fere
nt s
chem
es e
xist
for
su
stai
nabl
epa
lm o
il
6
GREEN PALM / BOOK & CLAIMThe chain is not monitored for the presence of sustainable palm oil.Retailers can buy a GreenPalm certificate from certified grower
Source:http://www.rspo.org/
Dif
fere
nt s
chem
es e
xist
for
su
stai
nabl
epa
lm o
il
7
A book and claim system has been chosen for sustainable palm oil to avoid duplication of an expensive supply chain
Source:http://greenpalm.org 8
Agenda
Introduction to GO schemes
CertifHy Phase 1:• Definition of green hydrogen • GO scheme
Business Models for Green H2 GO’s
CertifHy Phase 2
Appendix: Analysis of pathways leading to green H2 production
9
Phase 2Phase 1
Define a widely acceptabledefinition of green hydrogen
CertifHy aims to develop the 1st European-wide Green and Low Carbon hydrogen GO scheme
Determine how to designand implement a robust EUwide GO scheme
2
Set-up a hydrogen GO Stakeholder platform
2014 2016 2017 2018/9 2020s..
Finalise the scheme designensuring it can be the main routeto guarantee the origin of green &low carbon hydrogen across EUMember States
Run a pilot scheme to test the proposed design
1
2
3
Identify actions which need to beundertaken after the completionof the study to achieve an EUwide deployment of the scheme
4
1
Phase 3
Prepare EU wide deployment:Implement key elements
Ø Competent authorityØ Issuing BodyØ Registry operatorØ Accreditation body
10
Finalise Regulation, Codes and Standards:
ØCEN StandardØ EU and national regulation Ø CertifHy scheme docs
1
2
Affiliated partners:
WP7:ProjectManagementandAdministrationProjectleader:Hinicio
WP1:Genericmarketoutlook forgreen
hydrogenProjectleader:Hinicio
WP6:StakeholderEngagement&CommunicationProjectleader:Hinicio
WP2:Definitionof“GreenHydrogen”Project leader:TÜVSÜD
WP3:ReviewofexistingplatformsforGOProject leader:ECN
WP4:Definitionofanewframeworkof
guaranteesoforiginfor"green"hydrogen
Project leader:TÜVSÜD
WP5:RoadmapfortheimplementationofanEU-
wideGOschemeforgreenhydrogenProject leader:ECN
The current definition of Green and Low Carbon Hydrogen and GO scheme has been the result of a 2 year consensus building processfrom 2014 to 2016
RationaleofgreenH2
Lessonslearntfromotherinitiatives
Commondefinitionwithallstakeholders
Robust+Transparentsystem
Buy– inEnabling implementation
11
Consortium
Affiliated Partners
6/13/18
12
Over those two years: a step-by-step consensus building approach was followed with many models developed along the way
Example of intermediary approaches:• GHG emissions to be allocated to RE part • GHG emissions to allocated to both RE and
non-RE part • Green H2 to have zero GHG emissions • See D2.4 on http://www.certifhy.eu in
“publications-and-deliverables” for a full report
13
The definition of green and Low Carbon hydrogen was one of themain outcomes of the program
Renewable energy Non renewable energy
Low
-car
bon CertifHy
Green H2Bio
Hydro/Wind/Solar**
CertifHyLow Carbon H2NuclearelectricityFossilwithCCS/CCU
Not
Low
-car
bon
Carbon intensity* limit that will evolve over time* Greenhouse gas emissions (CO2 equ.) per unit of hydrogen over whole generation pathway up to marketable product
** Zero carbon intensity since electricity from these sources is considered to have zero carbon intensity by convention
201X202X202X
Feedstock
GHG
Renewable hydrogen will be as green as the energy input into the production device
Hydrogen production
Electricity input10 GJ
Biomass input20 GJ
14
Total energy input : 30 GJ
Renewable*:20GJNon-renewable:
7GJ
Renewable*:3GJ
Renewable:23GJ
Non-renewable:7GJ 23%
77%
RenewableH2
77%
Non-renewableH2
23%
*ViaGOordirectfeedstock
Hydrogen GOs and the associated GHG emissions cover the whole generation pathway up to marketable product
15
Productiondevice
Transport
Storage
CertifHyscope
OutofscopeH2product:
≥99.9%&≥30bar
Outofscope
Dispensing
With the low carbon benchmark set at an ambitious level, yet allowing for bio-based sources to be eligible
16
Eligiblepathways
The definition of green and Low Carbon hydrogen was widely endorsed by stakeholders
17
The current definition of Green and Low-Carbon Hydrogen has been the result of a 2 year consensus building process;
Outcome of 1st consultation: “No GOs should be allowed for
biomass co-fired coal power plants”
Was adapted to hydrogen into:
“Overall emissions of a hydrogen production device issuing GO’s should not exceed benchmark”
90%
10 %
10 %
18
Getting consensus on a GO Scheme was the second major outcome (1/2)
19
Getting consensus on a GO Scheme was the second major outcome (2/2)
20
Agenda
Introduction to GO schemes
CertifHy Phase 1:• Definition of green hydrogen • GO scheme
Business Models for Green H2 GO’s
CertifHy Phase 2
Appendix: Analysis of pathways leading to green H2 production
21
A GO scheme allows access to green hydrogen for users that are not in the vicinity of green hydrogen sources & optimises the economics and
environmental footprint of a green H2 supply chain
22
1
2
2
n H2source BenchmarkRenewableandlow carbon
Participating toCertifHy scheme
CertifHyGreenH2
NoGOScheme:Dedicated SupplyChain CertifHyGOScheme:CaseHRS operatorensures green hydrogenbeingconsumedbyFCEV
H2 source
H2
H2
H2
H2
1
2 H2
H2
H2H2
H2H2
H2
2
H2 source
Residual mix
H2
GO
Mar
ket
As with RE GO’s, H2 GOs will create new business models for Green Hydrogen for H2 suppliers, HRS operators, Fleet Operators & OEMs
23
GO
Mar
ket
H2 supplier GO account
HRS operator GO account
H2H2
H2H2
Fleet operator GO account
H2
Vehicle OEM GO account
H2
H2H2
HRS operator GO account
On-siteproduction
1
2
3
4
2’H2
H2
H2
H2
H2
H2
H2
Agenda
Introduction to GO schemes
CertifHy Phase 1:• Definition of green hydrogen • GO scheme
Business Models for Green H2 GO’s
CertifHy Phase 2:• Current status• Achievements• Next steps
Appendix: Analysis of pathways leading to green H2 production 24
Phase 2Phase 1
Define a widely acceptabledefinition of green hydrogen
CertifHy aims to develop the 1st European-wide Green and Low Carbon hydrogen GO scheme
Determine how to designand implement a robust EUwide GO scheme
2
Set-up a hydrogen GO Stakeholder platform
2014 2016 2017 2018/9 2020s..
Finalise the scheme designensuring it can be the main routeto guarantee the origin of green &low carbon hydrogen across EUMember States
Run a pilot scheme to test the proposed design
1
2
3
Identify actions which need to beundertaken after the completionof the study to achieve an EUwide deployment of the scheme
4
1
Phase 3
Prepare EU wide deployment:Implement key elements
Ø Competent authorityØ Issuing BodyØ Registry operatorØ Accreditation body
25
Finalise Regulation, Codes and Standards:
ØCEN StandardØ EU and national regulation Ø CertifHy scheme docs
1
2
Affiliated partners:
Who are we? The CertifHy project team
26
Independent strategy consulting firm specialized in sustainable energy and transport with a European competence centre on hydrogen and fuel cells.
The Energy research Centre of the Netherlands (ECN) is a leading independent European institute for applied energy technology development, energy research, and policy advice.
LBST is an expert consultancy for sustainable energy and mobility founded with a European competence centre on hydrogen and fuel cells with one of the longest track-records.
TÜV SÜD is one of the world’s leading technical service providers of testing, inspection, certification and training solutions with the strategic business segments INDUSTRY, MOBILITY and CERTIFICATION.
Grexel is the leading European energy certification service provider
Project leader
CertifHy phase 2
CertifHy phase 1 & 2
Platform operationPlatform creation
Platform operational
Plat
form
Steering Group
WG 1: GO Scheme and procedures
WG 2: GO issuing (Producers)
WG 3: GO commercialisation
and use (Users)
Preliminary scheme definition- incl. interaction with standards and regulation
Pilot specification
Milestone
Stakeholder group
WP1: The creation and operation of a stakeholders platform
Updating of GO scheme
Plan for EU rollout
Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar
WP3: Pilot scheme development, operation and feedback
Pilot preparation- Scheme procedures- ICT system- Production site audits- Monitoring plan
Preliminary GO scheme defined
Pilot operation - Registry operation- GO issuing and use - Pilot monitoring and stakeholder feedback- Cost analysis and business model
Pilot online
WG 4: Regulatory framework
WP2: Preliminary scheme finalization & Specification of pilot
GO scheme finalizedEU roll out plan adopted
Pilot scheme tested
WP4: Final GO scheme design & EU-wide implementation plan
27
Current status
WP1 & WP2 are finalized, WP3 is progressing well, with Pilot in final stage of preparation
CertifHy2 is developing all the core elements of a hydrogen GO scheme to test through pilot implementation
REGISTRY SYSTEM
ISSUING CRITERIA
SCHEME DESIGN & PROCEDURES
GO issuing
GO transfer
GO cancellation
GO expiry
Ac. holder registration
Prod. dev. registration
Merged functionsinthepilot
Accreditation of certification
body
Registration of issuing body
100 t/y - 50%GO volumeTotal - Market av.
3
29
4 pilot producers with different production pathways will lead to the issuance of GOs made available to the market
TBD
TBDGO volume
Total - Market av.
SMR with CCU - Port Jérôme (France)1
12 t/y - 0% GO volumeTotal - Market av.
Electrolyser + Wind – Halle (Belgium)2
Up to 38 t/y - 10%GO volumeTotal- Market av.
Electrolyser + grid - Falkenhagen (Germany)4
Chlor Alkali - Botlek (Netherlands)
The CertifHy scheme is developed collaboratively with key stakeholders across the value chain
30
WG 1: GO Scheme and procedures
WG 4: Regulatory framework
+ 25 new members in 2018 withincreasing international interest (US, AU)
WG 2: GO issuing (Producers)
WG 3: GO commercialisation and use
(Users)
1st design of CertifHy GO scheme is endorsed by WG1
31
3 meetings (WG1)
Questions still being addressed
Content1) Introduction2) Core principles
2.1 Uniqueness2.2 Transparency2.3 Immutability2.4 Ownership of CertifHy GOs2.5 Operational reliability
3) CertifHy Goals & Mission4) Scope and Normative references
4.1 Geographical scope4.2 Technologies 4.3 Applications
5) Definitions6) Roles & responsibilities7) GO Labels and content
7.1 GO Labels7.2 GO Content7.3 Cancellation statement
8) ProceduresAnnexes
Next steps
- GO lifetime- GO content
Updating the GO scheme based upon the results of the pilot (WP4)
A selection of procedures necessary for the pilot are currently being drafted
32
2 meetings (WG1)1 meeting planned (WG2) 1 meeting to be set up (WG3)
Questions to be addressed
Content
Next steps
None
Getting feedback from WGs for finalising the procedures
Illustrative example of CertifHy proceduresP0.1 | Registration of Account Holder
33
P0.1 | Registration of Account Holder
Call to amend/correct inputs
Account Holder registeredin the Registry
Applicant submits request for Account Holder registration to
Issuing Body
Forms:§ Registration form (online)
Entry of Account Holder in the Registry
Account Holder dismissedto register
Issuing Body decision?
Rework Clearance
Dismissal
Note:§ Must/shall/nice-to-have
criteria?
Applicant submits signed Standard terms of service to Issuing Body
Forms:§ Standard terms of service
Notes:§ Must be a legal entity§ Several accounts per legal entity possible§ “know your customer”!
Case studies using the pilot plants on the application of CertifHy criteria were performed
34
Individual meetings with pilot producer (4)2 meetings (WG2)1 meeting planned (WG2)
Questions being addressed
Content
Next steps
1) Consideration of CCU2) CO2 emissions allocation in
Chlor-Alkali process+ others
Ø WG2 meeting to address outstanding questions
Ø TÜV to finalise audit report to allow GO issuing
4 case studies for different production pathways with:
1) A brief description of the pilot plant
2) The expected GO issuing and use during the pilot
3) A production process diagram, including production device boundary
4) Detailed application of the CertifHy criteria (i) on past production and (ii) on production batch (calculation of the H2 product footprint and quantity of Green/ Low Carbon H2 produced)
All 4 pilot plant audits have been undertakenAudits
Colruyt Group – Electrolysis (Alkaline + PEM)
35
Key characteristics
• H2 production capacity: 8,1 kg/h• PEM (2,7 kg/h) + Alkaline (5,4 kg/h)
• Storage• 85 kg
• Fuel Cell: 120 kW
Production process description
36
Key parameters
• 400 bar 75 forklifts / heavy duty• 900 bar min 5 passenger cars
• Purity min 99,998 %
Production process diagram
37
Distributioncabinet
ALKelektrolysis5.4kg/u
PEMelektrolysis2.7kg/u
Compressor12.7kg/u
Compressor25.4kg/u
Storage A420bar
Storage B420bar
Outdoordispenser
Publicservicestation
Indoordispenser1
Backup storage200bar
Backup
Distributioncabinet
Compressor1Compressor2
ALKElektrolysis
PEMElektrolysis
Outdoordisp.
BackupStorageA
StorageB
H2
H2
H2
O2
Indoordispenser2
?
?
?
Expected GO issuing and use during pilot (6 Months)
38
Expected hydrogen production volume
Max 190 kg/d
Green Hydrogen GOs
Up to 190 kg/d
Low Carbon Hydrogen GOs
Up to 0 kg
Share available for GO market
0 %
Share available for GO market
0 %
Criteria to be checked for issuing CertifHy GOs(1) on past production and (2) on production batch
39
Timet2t2 – 12mths
H2Production
12months*
t1
ProductionBatch
Non-renewableshare
Renewableshare
CertifHyLowCarbonH2 GOs
CertifHyGreenH2GOs
(1)Averagecarbonfootprintsincet2-12monthsofNon-CertifHyH2mustnotexceed91gCO2/MJH2
PastProduction
H2withGreenGO
H2withLCGO
GreyH2
<91gCO2/MJH2 ?
(2)AveragecarbonfootprintofH2coveredbyaCertifHyGOmustnotexceed36.4gCO2/MJH2
<36.4gCO2/MJH2 ?
<36.4gCO2/MJH2 ?
* Or since joining the scheme if more recent than 12 months
Renewable share of hydrogen = Share of renewable energy in the energy input into the production device
Hydrogen production
Electricity input10 GJ
Biomass input20 GJ
40
Total energy input : 30 GJ
Renewable*:20GJNon-renewable:
7GJ
Renewable*:3GJ
Renewable:23GJ
Non-renewable:7GJ 23%
77%
RenewableH2
77%
Non-renewableH2
23%
*ViaGOordirectfeedstock6/13/18
Definition of the production device -H2 from water electrolysis with purification and compression
41
WaterElectrolysis
& Compression (for storage)
Water
Hydrogen
O2
Grid Electricity
Product system
H2O
+ H
2
Wind/PV Electr.The “product system” (ISO 14044) includes all the steps needed for generating hydrogen with a purity of at least 99.9% and a pressure of at least 30 barg (CertifHy criteria).
Calculation of H2 product carbon footprint –(1) Non certified H2 produced in the preceding 12 months
42
Grid elec. consumed (MWh)
Grid. elec. emis. factor(tCO2eq/MWh)
1 tCO2eq/tH2= 8.33 gCO2eq/MJH2 LHV
El. GOs purchased*(MWh)
El. GO emis. factor(tCO2eq/MWh)
Measured Constant factor
Process specific factor
Calculation output
Calculation output for criteria application
In accounting
El. GOs purchased*(MWh)
H2 emissions (tCO2eq)
Certified H2 produced (t)
Non-certified H2 footprint tCO2eq/tH2)
Source of calculation input data
Emissions of cert. product (tCO2eq)
H2 produced(t)
Max footprint of non-certified product:10.9 tCO2eq/tH2= 91 gCO2eq/MJH2 LHV
In preceding 12 months:
* for greening grid electricity
Zero if GOs are acquired for all grid electricity
consumed
Note: Grid electricity is consumed when electrolyser consumption exceeds Wind/PV generation
Calculation of H2 product carbon footprint –(2) H2 batch foot print
43
Grid elec. consumed (MWh)
Grid. elec. emis. factor(tCO2eq/MWh)
El. GOs purchased*(MWh)
El. GO emis. factor(tCO2eq/MWh)
Measured Constant factor
Process specific factor
Calculation output
Calculation output for criteria application
In accounting
El. GOs purchased*(MWh)
H2 emissions (tCO2eq)
H2 batch footprint tCO2eq/tH2)
Source of calculation input data
H2 produced(t)
1 tCO2eq/tH2= 8.33 gCO2eq/MJH2 LHV
Max footprint of H2 batch:4.37 tCO2eq/tH2= 36.4 gCO2eq/MJH2 LHV
Between t1 and t2:
* for greening grid electricity
Zero if GOs are acquired for all grid electricity
consumed
Note: Grid electricity is consumed when electrolyser consumption exceeds Wind/PV generation
Calculation of the share of the batch that is of renewable origin
44
Total electricity consumed (MWh)
Renew. elec. GOs purchased (MWh)
H2 batch renew. share (%)
Between t1 and t2:
Wind/PV elec. consumed (MWh)
Measured Constant factor
Process specific factor
Calculation output
Calculation output for criteria application
In accounting
Source of calculation input data
Uniper WindGas Falkenhagen – Electrolysis
45
Key characteristics
Electrolysis• H2 production capacity 32 kgH2/h
360 m³H2/h2 MWel
Methanation• H2 utilisation 19 kgH2/h
210 m³H2/h• CO2 (biogenic) utilisation 104 kgCO2/h
52,5 m³CO2/h• SNG1 production capacity 41 kgSNG/h
57 m³SNG/hSource:Googlemaps 1 SNG=SyntheticNaturalGas
Production process diagram
46
Key parameters
Electrolysis• Product H2 pressure 10 bar
• Product H2 purity 5.0• Feed in either into gas grid
(certified as biogas) or in future into methanation plant
• Prequalified for secondary control reserve
Methanation• Catalytic methanation
• Product SNG1 purity G260
6Electrolysiscontainer2MWel,
max.360Nm³/h
Methanation210Nm³/hH2 à57Nm³/hSNG1
Measuringandcontrol systemSNG1 (methane)
Measuringandcontrol system
Hydrogen
CompressorHydrogenand/orSNG(methane)
CO2 Source(biogenicorigin) O
NTR
ASgaspipeline
Electricitygridincl.windfarmconnection(PowerGOs)
Unitprocess1 Unitprocess2
1 SNG=SyntheticNaturalGas
10bar(g) 55bar(g)
WindGas Falkenhagen
47
Expected GO issuing and use during pilot (6 Months)
48
Expected hydrogen production volume
Up to 38 tH2/a (max. 456 kgH2/d)1
Green Hydrogen GOs
Up to 38 t
Low Carbon Hydrogen GOs
0 t
Share available for GO market
Up to 10 %
Share available for GO market
na
1 Inaddition upto192tH2/a(directfeedin/nomethanation)
Compression
Definition of the production device -H2 from water electrolysis with purification and compression
49
H2 generation
&purification
Water
Hydrogen
O2
Electricity
Electricity
Unit process 1
Product system
LowP H2-1
Unit process 2
H2O
+ H
2
SNG
Low
PH
2-2
SNG
Note: At a any given moment in time, LowP H2 generated will be either ALL directly compressed for injection as pure hydrogen, or ALL converted to SNG.
The “product system” (ISO 14044) includes all the steps needed for generating hydrogen with a purity of at least 99.9% and a pressure of at least 30 barg(CertifHy criteria).
Calculation of H2 product carbon footprint –(1) Non certified H2 produced in the preceding 12 months
50
Grid elec. consumed (MWh)
Grid. elec. emis. factor(tCO2eq/MWh)
1 tCO2eq/tH2= 8.33 gCO2eq/MJH2 LHV
LowP H2 emissions (tCO2eq)
El. GOs purchased*(MWh)
El. GO emis. factor(tCO2eq/MWh)
El. GOs purchased*(MWh)
LowP H2 footprint(tCO2eq/tH2)
Grid elec. consumed (MWh)
Grid elec. emis. factor (tCO2eq/MWh)
El. GOs purchased(MWh)
El. GO emis. factor(tCO2eq/MWh)
El. GOs purchased(MWh)
Unit process 1
Unit process 2
Compression emissions (tCO2eq)
H2 emissions (tCO2eq)
Certified H2 produced (t)
Non-certified H2 footprint tCO2eq/tH2)
Emissions of cert. product (tCO2eq)
H2 produced(t)
Max footprint of non-certified product:10.92 tCO2eq/tH2= 91 gCO2eq/MJH2 LHV
In preceding 12 months:
LowP H2 produced(t)
LowP H2 fed to compressor (t)
LowP H2-1 emissions (tCO2eq)
* for greening grid electricity
Zero if GOs are acquired for all grid electricity consumed
Measured Constant factor
Process specific factor
Calculation output
Calculation output for criteria application
In accounting
Source of calculation input data
Calculation of H2 product carbon footprint –(2) H2 batch foot print
51
Grid elec. consumed (MWh)
Grid. elec. emis. factor(tCO2eq/MWh)
1 tCO2eq/tH2= 8.33 gCO2eq/MJH2 LHV
LowP H2–1 emissions (tCO2eq)
El. GOs purchased*(MWh)
El. GO emis. factor(tCO2eq/MWh)
El. GOs purchased*(MWh)
Grid elec. consumed (MWh)
Grid elec. emis. factor (tCO2eq/MWh)
El. GOs purchased(MWh)
El. GO emis. factor(tCO2eq/MWh)
El. GOs purchased(MWh)
Unit process 1
Unit process 2
Compression emissions (tCO2eq)
H2 emissions (tCO2eq)
H2 batch footprint tCO2eq/tH2)
H2 produced(t)
* for greening grid electricity
Zero if GOs are acquired for all grid electricity consumed
Measured Constant factor
Process specific factor
Calculation output
Calculation output for criteria application
In accounting
Source of calculation input data
Max footprint of H2 batch:4.37 tCO2eq/tH2= 36.4 gCO2eq/MJH2 LHV
Between t1 and t2:
Calculation of the share of the batch that is of renewable origin
52
Electricity consumed (MWh)
Renew. elec. GOs purchased (MWh)*
Unit process 1 Unit process 2
H2 batch renew. share (%)
Between t1 and t2:
Measured Constant factor
Process specific factor
Calculation output
Calculation output for criteria application
In accounting
Source of calculation input data
Wind elec. directly consumed (MWh)
Renew. elec. GOs purchased (MWh)*
Wind elec. directly consumed (MWh)
Electricity consumed (MWh)
* for greening grid electricity
Calculation of H2 product carbon footprint –(1) Non certified H2 produced in 12 months - Example
53
Grid elec. consumed (MWh)
Grid. elec. emis. factor(tCO2eq/MWh)
1 tCO2eq/tH2= 8.33 gCO2eq/MJH2 LHV
LowP H2 emissions (tCO2eq)
El. GOs purchased*(MWh)
El. GO emis. factor(tCO2eq/MWh)
El. GOs purchased*(MWh)
LowP H2 footprint(tCO2eq/tH2)
Grid elec. consumed (MWh)
Grid elec. emis. factor (tCO2eq/MWh)
El. GOs purchased(MWh)
El. GO emis. factor(tCO2eq/MWh)
El. GOs purchased(MWh)
Unit process 1
Unit process 2
Compression emissions (tCO2eq)
H2 emissions (tCO2eq)
Certified H2 produced (t)
Non-certified H2 footprint tCO2eq/tH2)
Emissions of cert. product (tCO2eq)
H2 produced(t)
Max footprint of non-certified product:10.92 tCO2eq/tH2= 91 gCO2eq/MJH2 LHV
LowP H2 produced(t)
LowP H2 fed to compressor (t)
LowP H2-1 emissions (tCO2eq)
* for greening grid electricity
Zero if GOs are acquired for all grid electricity consumed
Measured Constant factor
Process specific factor
Calculation output
Calculation output for criteria application
In accounting
Source of calculation input data
Production time frame: Jul 2015 – Jun 2016
6184
6184
100
100
225
2250
0
0
6184
00
225
0
0
100
0
0
00
Calculation of H2 product carbon footprint –(2) H2 batch foot print - Example
54
Grid elec. consumed (MWh)
Grid. elec. emis. factor(tCO2eq/MWh)
1 tCO2eq/tH2= 8.33 gCO2eq/MJH2 LHV
LowP H2–1 emissions (tCO2eq)
El. GOs purchased*(MWh)
El. GO emis. factor(tCO2eq/MWh)
El. GOs purchased*(MWh)
Grid elec. consumed (MWh)
Grid elec. emis. factor (tCO2eq/MWh)
El. GOs purchased(MWh)
El. GO emis. factor(tCO2eq/MWh)
El. GOs purchased(MWh)
Unit process 1
Unit process 2
Compression emissions (tCO2eq)
H2 emissions (tCO2eq)
H2 batch footprint tCO2eq/tH2)
H2 produced(t)
* for greening grid electricity
Zero if GOs are acquired for all grid electricity consumed
Measured Constant factor
Process specific factor
Calculation output
Calculation output for criteria application
In accounting
Source of calculation input data
Max footprint of H2 batch:4.37 tCO2eq/tH2= 36.4 gCO2eq/MJH2 LHV
Between Jul 2015 and Jul 2016:
6184
6184
225
2250
0
0
6184
0
225
0
0100
0
0
Calculation of the share of the batch that is of renewable origin –Example
55
Unit process 1 Unit process 2
Measured Constant factor
Process specific factor
Calculation output
Calculation output for criteria application
In accounting
Source of calculation input data
Between Jul 2015 and Jul 2016:
Electricity consumed (MWh)
Renew. elec. GOs purchased (MWh)*
H2 batch renew. share (%)
Wind elec. directly consumed (MWh)
Renew. elec. GOs purchased (MWh)*
Wind elec. directly consumed (MWh)
Electricity consumed (MWh)
* for greening grid electricity
6184
0
225
0
6184
225
100%
The ICT registry system is operational and we are in the process of creating accounts for the pilot plants and users
56
3 demonstrations of the tool (WG2 -1 & WG3 - 2)Further demonstrations possible
Key issues
Content
Next steps
Identifying a diversity of pilot users
Start issuing and trading GOs.
Register at the following address:https://grexel.kayako.com/Knowledgebase/Article/View/26/9/how-to-open-a-certifhy-account-in-cmogrexel
CertifHy is following up on key EU regulatory evolutions to identify barriers, issues and opportunities
57
3 meetings (WG4)Questions which are being raised wrt RED II
Next stepsØ Continue monitoring RED II
evolutionsØ Examine links between
CertifHy GO and other GO schemes
Ø Review other upcoming legislation (Gas Directive, State Aid, Implementing Act…)
1) Definition of green hydrogen not mentioned in RED II;2) The purpose of GOs - in RED II, it is limited to proving or showing a final customer that a given share or quantity of energy is produced from renewable energy;3) CertifHy scope of applications is larger than RED II, more applications & includes low carbon hydrogen4) MS could implement non-unified GO rules as provisions for GOs are not explicit and/or mandatory;5) Biofuels, biomass fuels and bioliquids must use a mass balance approach. This raises issues of compatibility with CertifHy’s book-and-claim approach for bio-based hydrogen for transport;6) Possibly no GOs issued to RES-E producers receiving financial support (e.g. FIT/FIP)7) Conditions for counting electricity from the grid as fully renewable (implementing act to be adopted by December 2021).
The standardisation framework will be developped to support the CertifHy hydrogen GO scheme
58
2 WG1 meetings1 meeting with CEN TC6 WG2
Questions to be addressed
Content
Next steps
Ø WG1 to suggest what should be in the standard and what shouldn’t.
Ø Recommendations to CEN for the standard.
1) Existing standardization efforts• The main standardization efforts relevant to CertifHy is
the work undertaken by CEN-CENELEC TC6 “Hydrogen in Energy Systems” WG2 on Guarantees of origin.
• The Commission is finalizing a standardization request (mandate) which is expected to cover GOs.
2) Ensuring coherence between the CertifHy scheme and standardization efforts
• It was agreed that CertifHy should be the source of the needed content for a standard
NoteThe CertifHy project position is that the definition of green hydrogen should not be included in the standard, and that there should not be a harmonized standard.
GO framework for electricity today
59
GO for H2 (under development)
60
We are focusing on addressing 2 key issues in the short term
61
Key issues Next steps
1) Going to be discussed as part of WG2 on 15/05
2) Will be reviewed by consortium as needed
3) Expected GO issuing by
1) Addressing the identified questions to allow TÜV SÜD to issue an audit report on the basis of which GOs can be issues
2) Identify GO users to purchase and trade GOs
1) Define key potential targets
2) Continue communication efforts
Platform operationPlatform creation
Platform operational
Plat
form
Steering Group
WG 1: GO Scheme and procedures
WG 2: GO issuing (Producers)
WG 3: GO commercialisation
and use (Users)
Preliminary scheme definition- incl. interaction with standards and regulation
Pilot specification
Milestone
Stakeholder group
WP1: The creation and operation of a stakeholders platform
Updating of GO scheme
Plan for EU rollout
Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar
WP3: Pilot scheme development, operation and feedback
Pilot preparation- Scheme procedures- ICT system- Production site audits- Monitoring plan
Preliminary GO scheme defined
Pilot operation - Registry operation- GO issuing and use - Pilot monitoring and stakeholder feedback- Cost analysis and business model
Pilot online
WG 4: Regulatory framework
WP2: Preliminary scheme finalization & Specification of pilot
GO scheme finalizedEU roll out plan adopted
Pilot scheme tested
WP4: Final GO scheme design & EU-wide implementation plan
62
Current status
Where we stand/current status
Phase 2
Next steps beyond CertifHy phase 2 (1/2)
2017 2018/9 2020s..
63
Phase 3: Preparing EU-wide roll-out of a financially sustainable hydrogen GO scheme
Elaborate the procedures (e.g for certification bodies) being developed in the current pilot into standard contractual documents to ensure multiple certification bodies can offer their services to green hydrogen producers.
ØDevelop legal/contractual documents (e.g. standard terms of use)ØBring in line procedure with European standards under development
2
Build/expand and safely operate an ICT registry with the right level of service support to its users, tailored to the needs of green hydrogen GO users.
3
Appoint or select all of the actors for a GO scheme to become operational:ØCompetent authority;ØAccreditation body;ØCertification bodies;ØIssuing body;ØRegistry operator.
The Stakeholder Platform will act as the competent authority as long as a legal basis for hydrogen GOs is not available.
1
Phase 2
Next steps beyond CertifHy phase 2 (2/2)
2017 2018/9 2020s..
64
Phase 3: Preparing EU-wide roll-out of a financially sustainable hydrogen GO scheme
Develop the stakeholder platform so it becomes a forum for stakeholders to provide convergent input and influence on RCS (e.g. RED II recast and its implementing acts, the upcoming Gas Directive, contributing to work carried out by CEN-Cenelec/ TC6/WG2…)
5
Ensure all scheme documents and procedures are compliant with the anticipated future Regulation, Code and Standards (RCS) environment.
6
Create social awareness of the existence of the hydrogen GO platform and potentially trade green hydrogen GOs commercially launching Hydrogen GOs in the market incl.
ØInitial market identification and targeting, communications, etc., ØStart the trade of CertifHy GOs and refinement of tradeable products based on trader and
user feedback.
4
Agenda
Introduction to GO schemes
CertifHy Phase 1:• Definition of green hydrogen • GO scheme
Business Models for Green H2 GO’s
CertifHy Phase 2
Appendix: Analysis of pathways leading to green H2 production
65
Application of Benchmark threshold on Past Production of the Hydrogen Plant
Timet2t2 – 12months
H2Production
12months
t1
AverageGHGintensitysincet2-12monthsofNon-CertifHyH2
mustnotexceed91gCO2/MJH2
PastProduction
H2withGreenGO
H2withLCGO
GreyH2
<91gCO2/MJH2 ?
666/13/18
At the batch level, hydrogen needs to be Low Carbon for producing CertifHy Green or Low-Carbon GOs
Timet2t2 – 12mths
H2Production
12months
t1
ProductionBatch
Non-renewableshare
Renewableshare
CertifHyLowCarbonH2 GOs
CertifHyGreenH2GOs
AverageGHGintensitysincet2-12monthsofNon-CertifHyH2
mustnotexceed91gCO2/MJH2
PastProduction
H2withGreenGO
H2withLCGO
GreyH2
<91gCO2/MJH2 ?
AverageGHGintensityofH2coveredbyaCertifHyGOmustnotexceed36.4gCO2/MJH2
<36.5gCO2/MJH2 ?
<36.5gCO2/MJH2 ?
196/13/18
Decision tree presenting the criteria for producing Low-Carbon and CertifHy Green H2
Average emissions of Non-CertifHy H2 <91gCO2 eq/MJ (benchmark)?
Batch emissions < 36,4gCO2 eq/MJ
(40% of benchm.)?
100% Non- renew. batch
X% renewable and
Production unit NOT ELIGIBLE
YesNo
YesNo
Renewable energy input into batch?
YesNo
100% Low-carbon H2
Renewable share emissions
< 36,4gCO2 eq/MJ ?
YesNo
X% Green H2
Non-renewable share emissions
< 36,4gCO2 eq/MJ ?
1-X% Low-carbon H2
YesNo
68
1-X%Grey H2
X%Grey H2
100%Grey H2
and (1-X%) non-renewable. share
6/13/18
Electrolysis with different energy mixes as energy input (1/5)
Average emissions of pastNon-CertifHy H2 <91gCO2 eq/MJ
(benchmark)?
Batch emissions < 36,4gCO2 eq/MJ
(40% of benchm.)?
60% renewable and 40% non-renew.shares
Production unit NOT ELIGIBLE
YesNo
YesNo
Renewable energy input into batch?
No
Renewable share emissions
< 36,4gCO2 eq/MJ ?
No
60% Green H2
Non-renewable share emissions
< 36,4gCO2 eq/MJ ?
1-X% Low-carbon H2
YesNo
Yes
Yes
69
Electrolyser
60%
40% EU electricity mix *
* GHG content as disclosed by electricity supplier’s mix
100% Non- renew. batch
100% Low-carbon H2
100%Grey H2
60%Grey H2
40%Grey H2
6/13/18
Electrolysis with different energy mixes as energy input (2/5)
Average emissions of pastNon-CertifHy H2 <91gCO2 eq/MJ
(benchmark)?
Batch emissions < 36,4gCO2 eq/MJ
(40% of benchm.)?
Production unit NOT ELIGIBLE
YesNo
YesNo
Renewable energy input into batch?
No
Renewable share emissions
< 36,4gCO2 eq/MJ ?
No
60% Green H2
Non-renewable share emissions
< 36,4gCO2 eq/MJ ?
1-X% Low-carbon H2
YesNo
Yes
Yes
70
Electrolyser
50%
50% EU electricity mix *
* GHG content as disclosed by electricity supplier’s mix
100% Non- renew. batch
100% Low-carbon H2
100%Grey H2
60%Grey H2
40%Grey H2
60% renewable and 40% non-renew.shares
6/13/18
Depending on the non-renewable energy source used, a minimum amount of Renewable Energy may be needed to keep GHG intensity of non-CertifHy H2 of the plant below benchmark
Note: PV and Wind are assumed to have zero GHG intensity 71
0% 10% ... 50% 60% 70% 80%EUMix 217,1 217,1 195,4 ... 108,6 86,8 65,1 43,4Coal 423,7 423,7 381,3 ... 211,9 169,5 127,1 84,7Naturalgas 191,5 191,5 172,4 ... 95,8 76,6 57,5 38,3Nuclear 7,5 7,5 6,8 ... 3,8 3,0 2,3 1,5Specificmix 50,0 50,0 45,0 ... 25,0 20,0 15,0 10,0Red:facilityisNOTallowedtoproduceH2withaCertifHyGoO
Carbonintensity(gCO2/MJH2)of"Non-CertifHyH2"infunctionoftheelectricitymixusedWithinclusionofarenewableshareWithoutinclusionofa
renewableshare
NotElegible toproduceLowCarbonorCertifHyGreenH2
MinimumrenewablesharerequiredinNon-CertifHyH2formaintainingeligibilitytoproduceCertifHyH2
EUMix 217,1 58,1%Coal 423,7 78,5%Naturalgas 191,5 52,5%Nuclear 7,5 0,0%Specificmix 50,0 0,0%
Min.renewablesharerequired
Non-renew.originemissions(gCO2/MJH2)
Non-renew.origin
6/13/18
Average emissions of pastNon-CertifHy H2 <91gCO2 eq/MJ
(benchmark)?
Batch emissions < 36,4gCO2 eq/MJ
(40% of benchm.)?
Production unit NOT ELIGIBLE
YesNo
YesNo
Renewable energy input into batch?
No
Renewable share emissions
< 36,4gCO2 eq/MJ ?
No
X% Green H2
Non-renewable share emissions
< 36,4gCO2 eq/MJ ?
1-X% Low-carbon H2
YesNo
Yes
Yes
72
Electrolyser
100% French electricity mix *
* GHG content as disclosed by electricity supplier’s mix
100% Non- renew. batch
100% Low-carbon H2
100%Grey H2
X%Grey H2
50%Grey H2
11%
76%
6%7%
hydraulic
nuclear
fossilfuels
otherrenewables
Electrolysis with different energy mixes as energy input (4/5)
X% renewable and 1-X % non-renew.shares
6/13/18
Average emissions of pastNon-CertifHy H2 <91gCO2 eq/MJ
(benchmark)?
Batch emissions < 36,4gCO2 eq/MJ
(40% of benchm.)?
Production unit NOT ELIGIBLE
YesNo
YesNo
Renewable energy input into batch?
No
Renewable share emissions
< 36,4gCO2 eq/MJ ?
No
X% Green H2
Non-renewable share emissions
< 36,4gCO2 eq/MJ ?
70% Low-carbon H2
YesNo
Yes
Yes
73
Electrolyser
70% French electricity mix *
* GHG content as disclosed by electricity supplier’s mix
100% Non- renew. batch
100% Low-carbon H2
100%Grey H2
30%Grey H2
50%Grey H2
11%
76%
6%7%
hydraulic
nuclear
fossilfuels
otherrenewables
Electrolysis with different energy mixes as energy input (5/5)
30% Renewable Electricity from waste wood
30% renewable and 70 % non-renew.shares
6/13/18
Average emissions of pastNon-CertifHy H2 <91gCO2 eq/MJ
(benchmark)?
Batch emissions < 36,4gCO2 eq/MJ
(40% of benchm.)?
Production unit NOT ELIGIBLE
YesNo
YesNo
Renewable energy input into batch?
No
Renewable share emissions
< 36,4gCO2 eq/MJ ?
No
25% Green H2
Non-renewable share emissions
< 36,4gCO2 eq/MJ ?
1-X% Low-carbon H2
YesNo
Yes
Yes
74* GHG content as disclosed by electricity supplier’s mix
100% Non- renew. batch
100% Low-carbon H2
100%Grey H2
X%Grey H2
75%Grey H2
25% renewable and 75 % non-renew.shares
Central Steam Methane Reforming (1/3)
CentralSMR
25% bio-methane from bio-waste
75% natural gas
6/13/18
Average emissions of pastNon-CertifHy H2 <91gCO2 eq/MJ
(benchmark)?
Batch emissions < 36,4gCO2 eq/MJ
(40% of benchm.)?
Production unit NOT ELIGIBLE
YesNo
YesNo
Renewable energy input into batch?
No
Renewable share emissions
< 36,4gCO2 eq/MJ ?
No
X% Green H2
Non-renewable share emissions
< 36,4gCO2 eq/MJ ?
1-X% Low-carbon H2
YesNo
Yes
Yes
75* GHG content as disclosed by electricity supplier’s mix
100% Non- renew. batch
100% Low-carbon H2
100%Grey H2
25%Grey H2
75%Grey H2
25% renewable and 75 % non-renew.shares
Central Steam Methane Reforming (2/3)
CentralSMR
25% bio-methane from corn
75% natural gas
6/13/18
Average emissions of pastNon-CertifHy H2 <91gCO2 eq/MJ
(benchmark)?
Batch emissions < 36,4gCO2 eq/MJ
(40% of benchm.)?
Production unit NOT ELIGIBLE
YesNo
YesNo
Renewable energy input into batch?
No
Renewable share emissions
< 36,4gCO2 eq/MJ ?
No
X% Green H2
Non-renewable share emissions
< 36,4gCO2 eq/MJ ?
1-X% Low-carbon H2
YesNo
Yes
Yes
76* GHG content as disclosed by electricity supplier’s mix
100% Non- renew. batch
100% Low-carbon H2
100%Grey H2
X%Grey H2
1-X%Grey H2
X% renewable and 1-X% non-renew.shares
Central Steam Methane Reforming (3/3) – with CCS
CentralSMR CCS
100% natural gas
6/13/18
Average emissions of pastNon-CertifHy H2 <91gCO2 eq/MJ
(benchmark)?
Batch emissions < 36,4gCO2 eq/MJ
(40% of benchm.)?
Production unit NOT ELIGIBLE
YesNo
YesNo
Renewable energy input into batch?
No
Renewable share emissions
< 36,4gCO2 eq/MJ ?
No
81% Green H2
Non-renewable share emissions
< 36,4gCO2 eq/MJ ?
1-X% Low-carbon H2
YesNo
Yes
Yes
77* GHG content as disclosed by electricity supplier’s mix
100% Non- renew. batch
100% Low-carbon H2
100%Grey H2
X%Grey H2
19%Grey H2
81% renewable and 19% non-renew.shares
On-site SMR (1/2) with bio-gas from bio-waste and non-renewable heat
81%
On-siteSMR19%
Non-renewable heat
6/13/18
Average emissions of pastNon-CertifHy H2 <91gCO2 eq/MJ
(benchmark)?
Batch emissions < 36,4gCO2 eq/MJ
(40% of benchm.)?
Production unit NOT ELIGIBLE
YesNo
YesNo
Renewable energy input into batch?
No
Renewable share emissions
< 36,4gCO2 eq/MJ ?
No
81% Green H2
Non-renewable share emissions
< 36,4gCO2 eq/MJ ?
1-X% Low-carbon H2
YesNo
Yes
Yes
78* GHG content as disclosed by electricity supplier’s mix
100% Non- renew. batch
100% Low-carbon H2
100%Grey H2
80%Grey H2
20%Grey H2
81% renewable and 19% non-renew.shares
On-site SMR (2/2) with bio-gas from corn and non-renewable heat
80%
On-siteSMR20%
Non-renewable heat
6/13/18
Project supported by the FCH JU
Q&A
6/13/18 79