credibility chapter 4 how believable is a claim? how credible is a source? 2 © 2009 mcgraw-hill...

45
Credibility Chapter 4 Chapter 4

Upload: desiree-burd

Post on 13-Dec-2015

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Credibility

Chapter 4Chapter 4

How believable is a claim?How credible is a source?

2© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Not an all-or-nothing thing!

3© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Statements/sources vary in credibility.

For example:For example:

“The teacher owns a duck.” “The teacher owns a dump truck.” “The teacher owns a hippopotamus.”

4© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Why is it harder to believe the Why is it harder to believe the teacher owns a hippopotamus? teacher owns a hippopotamus? It raises more questions.How’d she get one? Where does she keep the sucker? Say—isn’t it illegal to keep a hippo?Etc.

5© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

In short:In short:

The idea of the teacher owning a hippo conflicts with your “background knowledge.”

6© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

7© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Roy

alty

-Fre

e/C

OR

BIS

“Mr. Zingg drinks a pint of sulfuric acid each night before bed.”

““Believable” is NOT entirely Believable” is NOT entirely subjective:subjective:

8© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Which is most Which is most UNBELIEVABLE? UNBELIEVABLE?

Teacher is under 20 years old.Teacher is under 55 year old.Teacher is under 90 years old.

9© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Which is LEAST unbelievable? Which is LEAST unbelievable? They’ve taught crows how to play checkers. W. arranged 9/11 so he could invade Iraq and

get its oil. Dr. Moore is related to George Washington. Bigfoot exists. We have been visited by space aliens. Some of

them are taking this class.

10© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Which is MOST unbelievable? Which is MOST unbelievable?

Obviously:Obviously:

The more unbelievable the claim, the stronger the argument you need to accept it.

11© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

For example:For example:

“Dean Stooler can run a mile in less than four minutes.”

“Dean Stooler can run a mile in less than seven minutes.”

More is required to establish the first statement.

12

© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Watch out for things you accept Watch out for things you accept just because you’ve heard them just because you’ve heard them

so often:so often:A critical thinker will want EVIDENCE

before accepting “what everyone knows.”

13© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Old wives’ tales?Old wives’ tales?

Daddy long legs are the world’s most poisonous spider.

Eating carrots makes you see better. Aspirin with Coca-Cola will make you drunk. Pop Rocks followed by Pepsi can make your

stomach explode. Going outside with wet hair will give you a cold.

(more…)

14© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Old wives’ tales?Old wives’ tales?

Reading in dim light will hurt your eyes. Too much TV will hurt your eyes. Chocolate causes pimples. Coffee stunts your growth. Crossing your eyes can make you cross-eyed. Cracking your knuckles causes arthritis.

15© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Credibility of SourcesCredibility of Sources

16© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Two kinds of doubt:Two kinds of doubt:

1. Doubts about a source’s knowledge

2. Doubts about a source’s truthfulness, objectivity, reliability

17© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

““Smitty knows a lot, but you Smitty knows a lot, but you can’t trust a word he says.”can’t trust a word he says.”

“Smitty never lies, but he “Smitty never lies, but he doesn’t know a thing.”doesn’t know a thing.”

18© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Either way, Smitty isn’t the best source.

Q: Can you tell if a person (not someone you know) is lying to you?

Are there any tell-tale clues?

19© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Excessive sweating? Shifty eye movement/avoiding eye contact? Staring up to the left/other micro-expressions? Wimpy handshake? Changing the subject? Appearing lacking in self-confidence? Nervous laughter?

20© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

If any of these were at all If any of these were at all reliable, we wouldn’t need reliable, we wouldn’t need

courts, ID checks, lie courts, ID checks, lie detectors, blah blah blah…detectors, blah blah blah…

Why would teachers take precautions against cheating, if they could just

look at a kid and tell?

21© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Need four volunteers!

22© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

A more scientific experiment:Need just two volunteers…

23© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. 24

Here are your “voting” options.Here are your “voting” options.

T/T: Both telling truth

L/L: Both lying

T/L: First person truthful; second is lying

L/T: First person lying; second is truthful

Even a truthful source can:Even a truthful source can:

Make MISTAKESBe BIASEDLACK EXPERTISE

25© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

How to judge a person’s expertise?

26© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Self-confidence/nervousness?

27© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Clothes?

Posture?

Accent?Gender?

Nationality?

Those all seem pretty unreliable.

Anyone can LOOK like an authority…

28© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

29© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Height?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/3200296.stm

How would YOU make How would YOU make someone look like a scientist?someone look like a scientist?

Use a stereotype! White lab coat or poor-fitting suit Pocket protector Glasses; thick Gray hair German/British accent, etc.

30© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Conclusion:Conclusion:

It’s difficult to measure a It’s difficult to measure a person’s expertise by looking at person’s expertise by looking at

him or her.him or her.

31© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

BEST indicators of a source’s BEST indicators of a source’s knowledge are these:knowledge are these:

EducationExperienceReputationPositionAchievements

32© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Does being an expert in one field Does being an expert in one field make you an expert in another field?make you an expert in another field? Not if the two fields aren’t related. An expert in economics doesn’t automatically

qualify as expert in, say, political science. An expert in oceanography shouldn’t be

assumed to be an expert in genetics. Your business prof can’t be assumed to have

expert knowledge of history.

33© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

A common mistake:A common mistake:

To attach EXTRA authority to what someone says JUST because he/she:Is your parentIs your friendIs your teacher (Being a TEACHER carries extra weight in the person’s field, but the fact he/she is YOUR teacher doesn’t add anything.)

34© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Other sources:Other sources:

Newspapers; other print media Electronic media; TV, radio The Internet is actually a source of

sources, not a source in itself. University publications Government publications Professional journals

35© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

An example of an unreliable An example of an unreliable news source…?news source…?

The weekly rag available in the checkout line.

REDNECK ALIENS TAKE OVER REDNECK ALIENS TAKE OVER TRAILER PARK!TRAILER PARK!

36© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

A much better source:A much better source:

The website of the Sacremento Bee

http://www.sacbee.com/

37© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Even better (because more Even better (because more complete):complete):

The New York Times newspaper

38© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

One final idea…One final idea…

39© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Sometimes you get an Sometimes you get an unbelievable claim coming unbelievable claim coming

from a credible source.from a credible source.

Like, say, from a friend or a relative.

40© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Like, I had an aunt who was Like, I had an aunt who was convinced she saw a ghost. convinced she saw a ghost.

Good old Aunt Rose…she had no reason to lie, and she was as

honest as the day is long.

41© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

This brings us to Hume’s This brings us to Hume’s principle. principle.

Hume?

42© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

David HumeDavid Hume

David Hume (1711-1776), a nice chap. Liked to play whist. Here’s what he said…

43

© L

ibra

ry o

f Con

gres

s

Hume’s principle:Hume’s principle:

“No testimony is sufficient to establish a miracle, unless the testimony be of such a kind, that its falsehood would be more miraculous than the fact it endeavors to establish.”

44© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

“When anyone tells me he saw a dead man restored to life, I consider whether it be more probable that this person should either deceive or be deceived, or that the fact he relates should really have happened. I weigh the one miracle against the other; and always reject the greater miracle. If the falsehood of his testimony would be more miraculous than the event which he relates, then, and not till then, can he pretend to command my belief or opinion.”

“When anyone tells me he saw a dead man restored to life, I consider whether it be more probable that this person should either deceive or be deceived, or that the fact he relates should really have happened. I weigh the one miracle against the other; and always reject the greater miracle. If the falsehood of his testimony would be more miraculous than the event which he relates, then, and not till then, can he pretend to command my belief or opinion.”

45© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.