crisis and transition: the people’s perspective report 2011_crisis and...• ch t 4 e t hi i th t...
TRANSCRIPT
Transition Report 2011
Crisis and Transition:The People’s Perspective
The 2011 Transition Report - Overview
Based on 2010 “Life in Transition Survey”y• Combined household and values survey of 1000-1500
households in 29 transition countries and 5 Westernhouseholds in 29 transition countries and 5 Western comparator countries. Conducted in late 2010.
• Comparisons with first round, conducted in 2006Comparisons with first round, conducted in 2006
Three thematic chaptersp• Chapter 2: The crisis from the household perspective
(emphasis on economic and social impact)(emphasis on economic and social impact)
• Chapter 3: Support for markets and democracy after crisis
Ch t 4 E t hi i th t iti i• Chapter 4: Entrepreneurship in the transition region
Region hit hard by crisis, many still recoveringg y , y g
SEE
SEE: Short term outlook is gloomySEE: Short‐term outlook is gloomy
GDP Growth 2010-2012 (%) 4.0
2.0
3.0
0 0
1.0
-1.0
0.0
-2.0Albania Bosnia Bulgaria Croatia FYR
MacedoniaMontenegro Romania Serbia
2010 2011 (forecast) 2012 (forecast)
Bosnia and Herzegovina : Main messagesBosnia and Herzegovina : Main messages
• Highlights of past year
• No progress toward EU approximation
• Roads are being improved and some reforms occurring
• Economy has stabilized but business environment conditions• Economy has stabilized but business environment conditions still difficult
• Challenges for 2012• Challenges for 2012
• Advancing EU process is vital
• Privatisation needs to be accelerated
• Reengagement with the IMF would be a positive signalg g p g
2. Crisis impact on households2. Crisis impact on households2. Crisis impact on households“Crisis impacted people more th i d h
2. Crisis impact on households“Crisis impacted people more th i d hthan economies…and much more than in the West”than economies…and much more than in the West”
SEE countries particularly hard hitSEE countries particularly hard hit
Distribution of responses to question "How much has the crisis affected your household?"
Macedonia
Croatia
Distribution of responses to question How much has the crisis affected your household?
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Bulgaria
Macedonia
Albania
Romania
g
Serbia
Montenegro
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Transition Average
A great deal A fair amount Just a little Not at all
Households in transition region much more impacted th th i th W tthan those in the West…
39%Reduction in
11%Reduction in
staple food consumption
Reduction in staple food consumption
Transition Region Western Europe
… and the impact on household consumption in BiH, hil ll till b t ti lwhile smaller, was still substantial
23%Reduction in
11%Reduction in
staple food consumption
Reduction in staple food consumption
BiH Western Europe
Consumption decline is larger in BiH for most categories, particularly in health care
50
nse
Western Europe Transition region BiH
35
40
45rt
ing
resp
o Western Europe Transition region BiH
25
30
35
hold
s re
por
15
20
e of
hou
seh
0
5
10
Perc
enta
ge
0Reduced
staple foodconsumption
Reducedconsumption
of luxury
Reducedconsumptionof alcohol and
Postponed orskipped visits
to doctor
Delayedpayments of
utilitiesgoods smoking after
becoming ill
Household response
Why do households hurt so much?
4 d i f i i i d d ti f ll
1 Large actual crisis shocks (job losses
4 drivers of crisis-induced consumption fall
11. Large actual crisis shocks (job losses, bankruptcies, wage reductions …)
1
2. Official safety nets not very effective
3 Larger use of less effective informal borrowing
233. Larger use of less effective informal borrowing
4. FX borrowing exacerbated the impact in crisis-hit t i
34
countries
“Crisis events” drove consumption response1
p ppt
ion
xurie
s,
cons
ump
s, c
ut lu
x, e
tc)
mbe
r of c
ut b
asic
ssm
okin
g
rage
num
nses
(cu
cut s
People not hit by many events not cutting
BiH
Aver
resp
o events, not cutting consumption much
Average number of crisis events (job loss, wage drop, etc)
Social safety nets used less less effective2
Social safety nets used less - less effective40
ved
• Unemployment support in BiH is significantly weaker than the SEE and transition region 30
35
o receiv
gaverage
• In BiH only 3.4% of the unemployed received benefits20
25
ed who
fits
1015
employe
bene
f
05
of une
WesternEurope
New EUmembers
WesternBalkans
BiH CIS,GeorgiaSh
are
andTurkey
andMongolia
Informal borrowing used more – less effective3
Informal borrowing used more – less effective
45
354045
that • In BiH informal borrowing was
lower than the transition region but higher than W. Europe
• But informal borrowing only half
253035
seho
lds
mally
• But informal borrowing only half as effective
152025
hit h
ous
d inform
510
f crisis‐h
orrowe
0
Western BiH New EU Western CIS,Share of bo
Europe members Balkansand
,Georgia
S
Support forSupport forSupport for democracy and
k t Th
Support for democracy and
k t Thmarkets: The impact of the crisismarkets: The impact of the crisispact o t e c s spact o t e c s s
Democracy support was similar across regions in 2006…
70%
porters
50%
60%
cy sup
p
40%
50%
emocrac
30%
40%
re of d
e
30%
New EUmembers
CIS, Georgiaand Mongolia
WesternBalkans and
BiHShar
gTurkey
..but dropped in new EU and SEE, rose in CISpp ,
+6-10% 8% 19%+6-10% -8% -19%Decline in BiH largest in SEE; second largest in
70%ers
second largest in transition region
60%
uppo
rt
50%
cracy su
40%
f dem
o
30%
New EU CIS, Georgia Western BiHShare of
members, g
and Mongolia Balkans andTurkey
S
Support for markets started off virtually equal in 2006…
60%
orters
40%
50%
ets supp
30%
40%
of m
arke
20%
30%
Share o
20%
New EUmembers
CIS, Georgiaand Mongolia
WesternBalkans and
BiH
Turkey
..but dropped in new EU and SEE, rose in CIS..but dropped in new EU and SEE, rose in CIS
+5 -4%-10% +2%
In BiH support for
60%
ters
In BiH support for markets increased, unlike in most SEE
50%
supp
ort
40%
markets s
20%
30%
are of m
20%
New EUmembers
CIS, Georgia andMongolia
WesternBalkans and
BiH
Sha
members Mongolia Balkans andTurkey
Why?
3 key drivers of changes in attitudes1. Those hit harder by the crisis turned away from
democracy, markets 1
y,
• New EU countries hit harder
2. Those who experienced more severe past crises turned away less from democracy, markets
2
• CIS countries saw harder hits after 1990
3 P l “t d i t th t th h d”33. People “turned against the system they had”
• New EU countries turned against markets, 3
g ,democracy, CIS countries vice versa
3. Entrepreneurship and better business 3. Entrepreneurship and better business environment: Post-crisis opportunityenvironment: Post-crisis opportunity
Much less likely to start business than in West…
20% of respondents who successfully set up a business
14
16
18
10
12
14
4
6
8
0
2
4
Mongolia
Albania
Czech R
epu
Slovak R
epu
FYR
Maced
Slovenia
Serbia
Hungary
Bulgaria
Croatia
Montenegro
Turkey
Estonia
Poland
Rom
ania
Georgia
Kazakhstan
Uzbekistan
Kyrgyz R
ep
Moldova
Latvia
Lithuania
Russia
Bosnia and
Ukraine
Belarus
Tajikistan
Azerbaijan
Arm
enia
ublic
ublic
onia
ublic
Herz.
…lower success rate among those who tried
Country wealth correlated with success rate…
…but individual variables are more importantp
Women more than 6% less likely than men to try to set up a Women more than 6% less likely than men to try to set up a business… but equally likely to succeed once they try
Policies to support female entrepreneurs Policies to support female entrepreneurs
Those with university education 5-7 per cent more likely to try even though no more likely to succeed once they trytry, even though no more likely to succeed once they try
More business-relevant education – trial and success
Same factors / policies support “opportunity” entrepreneurs and “necessity” entrepreneurs
For opportunity entrepreneurs (driver of innovation) business environment and lower corruption matter more
Learn more at: www.ebrd.com/transitionreport