crisis management law enforcement ii 1. copyright © texas education agency 2011. all rights...

44
Crisis Management Law Enforcement II 1

Upload: tobias-stephens

Post on 21-Jan-2016

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Crisis Management Law Enforcement II 1. Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission

Crisis ManagementLaw Enforcement II

1

Page 2: Crisis Management Law Enforcement II 1. Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission

Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

Copyright and Terms of Service

Copyright © Texas Education Agency, 2011. These materials are copyrighted © and trademarked ™ as the property of the Texas Education Agency (TEA) and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of TEA, except under the following conditions:

1)  Texas public school districts, charter schools, and Education Service Centers may reproduce and use copies of the Materials and Related Materials for the districts’ and schools’ educational use without obtaining permission from TEA.

2)  Residents of the state of Texas may reproduce and use copies of the Materials and Related Materials for individual personal use only, without obtaining written permission of TEA.

3)  Any portion reproduced must be reproduced in its entirety and remain unedited, unaltered and unchanged in any way.

4)  No monetary charge can be made for the reproduced materials or any document containing them; however, a reasonable charge to cover only the cost of reproduction and distribution may be charged.

Private entities or persons located in Texas that are not Texas public school districts, Texas Education Service Centers, or Texas charter schools or any entity, whether public or private, educational or non-educational, located outside the state of Texas MUST obtain written approval from TEA and will be required to enter into a license agreement that may involve the payment of a licensing fee or a royalty.

Contact TEA Copyrights with any questions you may have.

2

Page 3: Crisis Management Law Enforcement II 1. Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission

Crisis Management: Part 1

3

Page 4: Crisis Management Law Enforcement II 1. Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission

Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

Most Common Types of Incidents

Hostage situation – an incident in which one or more persons take and unlawfully hold other persons against their will with the use or threatened use of force. The offender may subsequently make demands to secure his or her freedom or other items using the hostages as a bargaining tool. Generally the location of the offender and the hostages is known

4

Page 5: Crisis Management Law Enforcement II 1. Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission

Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

Most Common Types of Incidents (continued)

• Barricaded persons – an incident in which one or more persons take refuge at a location and use force to repel attempts to apprehend them. The person may subsequently make demands to secure his or her freedom or other items. Generally this situation differs from a hostage situation only in that a hostage has not been taken

• Suicide attempts – a person threatens to cause death to self by means of firearm or other deadly weapon

5

Page 6: Crisis Management Law Enforcement II 1. Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission

Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

Most Common Types of Incidents (continued)

• Active shooters – an incident in which one or more persons threatens to inflict death or grievous bodily harm, or inflicts death on one or more victims, in a single or multiple consecutive acts by means of firearms or other deadly weapons. These incidents generally occur at a targeted location against random victims. It may include the use of explosive devices by the offender

• Crisis – an unstable or crucial time or state of affairs in which a decisive change is impending, especially one with the distinct possibility of a highly undesirable outcome

6

Page 7: Crisis Management Law Enforcement II 1. Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission

Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

Crisis Negotiations: First Responder• Quickly assess the totality of the situation• Secure the area, both the inner and outer perimeters

• Individuals needing to be interviewed should be in a secure area to talk to an intelligence negotiator

• Designate a press/media area away from the perimeter and brief them at length

• Evacuate the immediate area of all uninvolved persons• If the hostage-taker is in a building, evacuate the building

involved and the adjacent building• Prevent pedestrian and vehicular traffic• Seal off all possible escape routes

7

Page 8: Crisis Management Law Enforcement II 1. Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission

Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

Crisis Negotiations: First Responder (continued)

• Gauge the threat to hostages and/or bystanders• Request additional personnel

• A SWAT team needs to be ready to neutralize the threat• An arrest team needs to be ready to take action

• Evacuate injured persons

8

Page 9: Crisis Management Law Enforcement II 1. Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission

Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

Crisis Negotiations: Officer in ChargeMakes decisions regarding police action

• Authorizes the use of force and chemical agents• Makes decisions regarding demands from the hostage-taker• Shall not comply with the following demands:

– No weapons will be provided; the hostage-taker may be bluffing with an unloaded or an imitation firearm

– No additional hostages will be given and exchanges of hostages will be done cautiously

– The hostage-taker cannot remove a hostage to a location where the police are not able to react immediately

9

Page 10: Crisis Management Law Enforcement II 1. Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission

Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

Crisis Negotiations: Officer in Charge (continued)

• Establishes a command post• Secures the inner and outer perimeters• Gains as much information as possible about the

hostage-taker• Is certain the hostage-taker knows that officers are

present, but does not know their strategies

10

Page 11: Crisis Management Law Enforcement II 1. Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission

Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

Crisis Negotiations: Officer in Charge (continued)

Determines the need for• Additional personnel including personnel from other agencies• Deployment of officers and vehicles• Special equipment• Control of utilities (water, electricity, telephone)

– The telephone is important for negotiators to control– Darkening to provide tactical advantage– Eliminates comforts (toilets, heat, AC)– Inability to monitor TV– Keeps from neutralizing chemical agents

11

Page 12: Crisis Management Law Enforcement II 1. Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission

Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

Crisis Negotiations: Crisis NegotiatorsCharacteristics of a negotiator

• High level of self-control• Ability to remain calm while stressed• Excellent interpersonal communication skills• Calm and confident demeanor• Good listener and interviewer• Team player

12

Page 13: Crisis Management Law Enforcement II 1. Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission

Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

Crisis Negotiations: Negotiation Team Members• Primary negotiator – communicates with the hostage-taker• Secondary negotiator – assists the primary by offering

advice, monitoring negotiations, keeping notes, and ensuring that the primary sees and hears everything in the proper perspective

• Intelligence negotiator – interviews the persons associated with the suspect to compile a criminal history, a history of mental illness, and other relevant information

• Additional negotiator – the “chief negotiator,” whose primary responsibility is to act as a buffer between command personnel and the negotiations team

13

Page 14: Crisis Management Law Enforcement II 1. Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission

Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

Crisis Negotiations: Negotiator Duties• Tries to reduce the number of people involved and only

talks to the leader of the hostage-taker• Tries to buy time (i.e., refer to a higher up as the

ultimate decision maker)• Attempts to ease personal animosity which the

hostage-taker may have towards the police or anyone else involved

14

Page 15: Crisis Management Law Enforcement II 1. Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission

Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

Crisis Negotiations: Negotiator Duties (continued)

• Is confident and avoids the appearance of weakness (if possible never give away anything without getting something in return)

• Utilizes delicate prodding, such as, “What if…” or, “How can I sell your request to my boss?”

• Asks the hostage-taker how the problem can be resolved

• Never criticizes the ideas of the hostage-taker or attempt to impose your own values

15

Page 16: Crisis Management Law Enforcement II 1. Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission

Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

Crisis Negotiations: Negotiator Duties (continued)

• Negotiates everything (food, water, heat)• Keeps the hostage-taker making decisions even on

minor issues (if food is wanted, what kind does the hostage-taker want, what does the hostage-taker want on pizza, etc.)

• Provides the hostage-taker with the method of communication for negotiations (telephone, radio). Make sure the device is restricted to transmit/receive only with the negotiators

16

Page 17: Crisis Management Law Enforcement II 1. Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission

Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

Crisis Negotiations: Deadlines and Demands• Decisions must be made based on

• Law• Department policy• Need for the preservation of life and property

17

Page 18: Crisis Management Law Enforcement II 1. Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission

Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

Steps of Crisis Negotiations:Assess the Situation

Prevent early harm– Obtain the briefing from the officer in charge– Ensure that police actions do not harm the hostages

or the hostage-takers– Negotiators are concerned with hostage safety and

not with the apprehension of the hostage-taker

18

Page 19: Crisis Management Law Enforcement II 1. Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission

Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

Steps of Crisis Negotiations:Assess the Situation (continued)

Get organized• Establish contact with the subjects

– Effective methods of communication include» Cell phones» Radios» Runners» Throwphones

19

Page 20: Crisis Management Law Enforcement II 1. Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission

Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

Steps of Crisis Negotiations:Assess the Situation (continued)

Get organized (continued)• Establish contact with the subjects (continued)

– Phone lines are essential for police control» Arrange with the telephone company to deny origination to

telephones at the subject’s disposal» The subject will no longer have a dial tone» The phone company establishes a new number that is a direct

line between the negotiators and the subject» This prohibits talk with family, friends, attorneys, and the press» This prevents the gathering of information about the police

maneuvers from associates

20

Page 21: Crisis Management Law Enforcement II 1. Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission

Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

Steps of Crisis Negotiations:Assess the Situation (continued)

• Get organized (continued)• Establish contact with the subjects (continued)

– Find information using all available sources» The number and the names of the hostage-takers» What they are demanding» What they really want» Their emotional state» How close they are to harming the hostages» The numbers and the general health of the hostages

• Locate a permanent position if negotiations will take a long time

21

Page 22: Crisis Management Law Enforcement II 1. Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission

Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

Steps of Crisis Negotiations:Getting Close

Create normality• The scene may be chaotic and panicked; negotiators

seek to create calm• Talk in a calm voice• Use good listening skills• Seek normality among emotions – a space where

hostage-takers can talk with the hostage negotiator as a reasonable person

• Always be there and ready to talk

22

Page 23: Crisis Management Law Enforcement II 1. Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission

Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

Steps of Crisis Negotiations:Getting Close (continued)

• Create humanity• Listen uncritically to the hostage-taker• Accept a hostage-taker as he or she is• Once humanity is established, discuss the well-being

of the hostages

23

Page 24: Crisis Management Law Enforcement II 1. Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission

Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

Steps of Crisis Negotiations:Getting Close (continued)

Develop authority• Hostage negotiators position

themselves as an authority figure• Become authoritative on behalf of the

hostage-taker (getting communication and food)

• Later become authoritative with the hostage-taker (this is dangerous because the hostage-taker wants to be in charge)

• If authority can be established, the negotiator may attempt to direct the hostage-taker’s actions

24

Page 25: Crisis Management Law Enforcement II 1. Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission

Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

Steps of Crisis Negotiations:Developing the Scene

• Take small steps towards building trust and relationships• Needed items such as food may be provided• Conversation with a hostage may be requested• Speed of talking may be sped up or slowed down

depending on the circumstances– Sped up if persons are injured– Slowed down on delivery of requested items

• Manage stress• Stress and tension will exist during negotiations• Reduce stress to create hostage safety • Increase stress to wear down hostage-takers

25

Page 26: Crisis Management Law Enforcement II 1. Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission

Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

Steps of Crisis Negotiations:Developing the Scene (continued)

Explore solutions• Discuss what will resolve the situation• May ask the hostage-taker his or her thoughts on a solution• Negotiators may offer their suggestions• Safe release of the hostages is important• The goal of the hostage-taker may be to escape, to receive

publicity or to gain materially. If the goal is not acceptable, alternatives must be found

26

Page 27: Crisis Management Law Enforcement II 1. Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission

Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

Steps of Crisis Negotiations:Developing the Scene (continued)

Releasing the hostages– Wear the hostage-taker down

• Talk, talk, talk• High emotions are followed by exhaustion• The ideal situation ends with hostage release

– Release the Weak• Releasing children, the elderly, or those with medical conditions

shows that the hostage-takers are not “bad” people– Concessions for people

• Offer an exchange of people for other concessions such as food or publicity

• If the hostage-taker receives something they have demanded, a release of hostages may follow

27

Page 28: Crisis Management Law Enforcement II 1. Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission

Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

Steps of Crisis Negotiations:Developing the Scene (continued)

Releasing the hostages (continued)

– Final assault• If no clear exchange can be

reached• If it looks like hostages will be

killed• Determine when negotiations

will be stopped and tactical operations enacted

• Some hostages may be killed• If the benefit of a tactical

assault outweighs the potential harm 28

Page 29: Crisis Management Law Enforcement II 1. Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission

Crisis Management: Part 2

29

Page 30: Crisis Management Law Enforcement II 1. Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission

Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

Communication Techniques

• Opening the conversation– Introduce yourself and your role in the negotiations– Ask them easy questions– Ask about them

• Knowing his or her name– Find out his or her name ahead of time if possible– If not, ask his or her name– Use his or her name in negotiations in order to

connect with him or her

30

Page 31: Crisis Management Law Enforcement II 1. Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission

Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

Communication Techniques (continued)

• Building rapport– Listen– Deliver on your promises– Use his or her name– Use parroting and/or paraphrasing

31

Page 32: Crisis Management Law Enforcement II 1. Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission

Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

Communication Techniques (continued)

Interrupting techniques help gain control of the conversation

– Clarifying interruption• Tell them you do not understand• Repeat what they said• Then move to what you want to say

– Encouragement interruption• Exclamations that show interest• Repeat single words or phrases• Ask a question• Use fillers (non-words) like “uh-huh” or “hmmm”

32

Page 33: Crisis Management Law Enforcement II 1. Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission

Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

Communication Techniques (continued)

Interrupting techniques (continued)– Question interruption

• Ask questions, preferably closed• Upon reply, ask another question, or give views on his

or her answer

– Permission interruption• Ask permission to interrupt• Example: “That’s a good point, may I add another

thought for you”

33

Page 34: Crisis Management Law Enforcement II 1. Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission

Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

Communication Techniques (continued)

• Sustaining the conversation– Ask the hostage-taker’s opinion– Show concern for the hostage-taker– Show interest in the hostage-taker– Discuss plans

• Closing conversation– Say that the conversation has ended– Summarize the conversation

34

Page 35: Crisis Management Law Enforcement II 1. Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission

Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

Communication Techniques (continued)

Listening – Active listening

• Positive encouragement– Use silent attention to give time to find words– Accept his or her emotional state without criticism

– Attentive listening• Pay attention so the hostage-taker can see that you are

interested in what he or she says

35

Page 36: Crisis Management Law Enforcement II 1. Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission

Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

Communication Techniques (continued)

Listening (continued)– Total listening

• Listen for the content and the underlying message• Respond to the emotional messages that are often

hidden in the content • If the hostage-taker is in view, watch for nonverbal cues

– Reflecting• Parroting• Paraphrasing

– Demonstrate respect• Listening demonstrates respect most effectively

36

Page 37: Crisis Management Law Enforcement II 1. Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission

Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

Hostage Safety

Time is important– The more time the hostage-taker spends with the hostages,

the less likely he or she is to take the life of a hostage– More time passing allows the police to prevent harm– More time passing allows the hostage-taker to make a

mistake, become apathetic, and/or abandon the confrontation– Determine the psychological state of the hostage-taker

• A criminal whose escape was blocked during the commission of a crime

• A psychotic or mentally deranged• A terrorist with a fanatical cause

37

Page 38: Crisis Management Law Enforcement II 1. Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission

Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

Hostage Safety (continued)

Extreme Hostage Situations– Hostage-takers have several choices

• Kill the hostages or release them• Kill themselves by their own hand or in a shoot-out• Negotiate a way out (often desired, seldom possible)• Give themselves up

38

Page 39: Crisis Management Law Enforcement II 1. Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission

Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

Hostage Safety (continued)

Time is important (continued)– If a hostage is killed, the lead negotiator needs to

• Fully assess the situation • Determine what steps should be taken to immediately

apprehend the hostage-taker– Did the victim contribute to the act by trying to disarm the

hostage-taker or by antagonizing him?– What is the mental state of the hostage-taker? Is he

agitated, remorseful, or irrational?

39

Page 40: Crisis Management Law Enforcement II 1. Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission

Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

Public Safety v. Individual Rights

4th Amendment (Mincey v. Arizona)– Emergencies relating to life and property excused normal

warrant requirements– Police entered the home without a warrant after hearing a

gun battle when an undercover officer had entered the home– Officers searched and entered to locate any injured persons,

render medical treatment, and find those responsible– Search and seizure found to be reasonable under the 4th

amendment without a warrant– A need to preserve life and prevent serious injury is

justification for what would otherwise be illegal

40

Page 41: Crisis Management Law Enforcement II 1. Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission

Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

Public Safety v. Individual Rights (continued)

• Admissibility during negotiations: Miranda v. Arizona– Miranda only applies if the suspect is in custody (under arrest

or restrained in freedom)– Miranda is only for use in interrogations, not negotiations

• Enforceability of demands– Negotiators can agree to the demands of the subject without

the government being legally bound

41

Page 42: Crisis Management Law Enforcement II 1. Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission

Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

Public Safety v. Individual Rights (continued)

Use of Force– Constitutional Limits: Tennessee v. Garner

• Sanctioned the use of force for the self-defense of others, or to prevent the escape of a person who committed a felony involving the infliction of serious bodily injury or death

• Where probable cause exists, belief that the suspect poses the threat of serious bodily injury to officers or self, it is reasonable to use deadly force to prevent escape

• In a hostage situation there is imminent threat to lives or safety; therefore, deadly force may be used if necessary to resolve threats

42

Page 43: Crisis Management Law Enforcement II 1. Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission

Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

Resources

• Santa Cruz Regional 9-1-1 www.sccecc.org/training/downloads/Scenarios/Hostage%20Barricade.doc

• Melbourne Police Department Crisis Negotiations Unit www.melbourneflorida.org/police/crisis_negotiations.htm

• Truro Police Department http://www.truropolice.org/On%20Line%20Manuals/Hostages.pdf

• Changing Minds http://changingminds.org/disciplines/negotiation/styles/hostage_negotiations.htm

• FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, Legal Issues in Crisis Management, Jeffrey Higginbotham, June 1994 http://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/publications/law-enforcement-bulletin/2002-pdfs/nov02leb.pdf

• Do an Internet search for the following:– SWAT team plays out hostage scenario– The ‘Lectric Law Library cjs10– Merriam-Webster

43

Page 44: Crisis Management Law Enforcement II 1. Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission

Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2011. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

Resources (continued)

Videos:• One-on-one with hostage negotiator (4:27 minutes)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HFpjO1R6AWk• Hostages Released After Barricade Situation (2:42 minutes)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q_kY_HGiyJA• Raphael Lapin Negotiation Strategies teaches techniques for

communication (5:09 minutes) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y46VsyCzbfQ

44