critical issues of xml schema & rdf & suggested solutions peter p. chen bootstrap institute...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Critical Issues of XML Schema & RDF & Suggested Solutions Peter P. Chen Bootstrap Institute & Louisiana State University chen@bit.csc.lsu.edu, chen](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071807/56649e945503460f94b991b9/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Critical Issues of XML Schema & RDF& Suggested Solutions
Peter P. ChenBootstrap Institute &
Louisiana State University
[email protected], http://www.csc.lsu.edu/~chen
![Page 2: Critical Issues of XML Schema & RDF & Suggested Solutions Peter P. Chen Bootstrap Institute & Louisiana State University chen@bit.csc.lsu.edu, chen](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071807/56649e945503460f94b991b9/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
OUTLINE
• General Comments• Critical Issues of RDF• Critical Issues of XML Schema• Important Issues to be Studied• How We Might Solve the Concerns of Microsoft
and Others
![Page 3: Critical Issues of XML Schema & RDF & Suggested Solutions Peter P. Chen Bootstrap Institute & Louisiana State University chen@bit.csc.lsu.edu, chen](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071807/56649e945503460f94b991b9/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
General Comments
• Some of the arguments are– Not valid (sometimes)
– Divert our attention to our important goal:
“Semantic Web”
• Example:– “Data vs. Meta Data”: Actually, a data model can be used
to model both “data” and “meta data.” The distinction may be useful for short-term marketing purposes,but we need to study the long-term implications
![Page 4: Critical Issues of XML Schema & RDF & Suggested Solutions Peter P. Chen Bootstrap Institute & Louisiana State University chen@bit.csc.lsu.edu, chen](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071807/56649e945503460f94b991b9/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Critical Issues of RDF• Strength: It can be viewed as
– A binary directional Entity-Relationship (ER) model– More powerful than pure XML “tree structures”
• Weaknesses of Current “Specifications”:– The use of the concept of “URI” as an “entity” is sometimes
confusing and not always consistent– Multi-level specifications seems to be not very clean– “Bag” and several other concepts are not well defined– Multiple “graphs” for same “semantics/statement,” and,
possibly multiple “semantics/statements” for the same graph.– The “RDF schema” specifications are unnecessarily
complicated
![Page 5: Critical Issues of XML Schema & RDF & Suggested Solutions Peter P. Chen Bootstrap Institute & Louisiana State University chen@bit.csc.lsu.edu, chen](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071807/56649e945503460f94b991b9/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Critical Issues of XML Schema• In general, the “syntax” part of XML Schema
is simpler than that of RDF.• Weaknesses/Needs of Current XML Schema
specifications:– Mixtures of document world terminology and data
world terminology (perhaps, too much on some of the unnecessary legacy)
– Needs a growth path to full ER modeling Capabilities including
• facilities to capture RDF semantics
![Page 6: Critical Issues of XML Schema & RDF & Suggested Solutions Peter P. Chen Bootstrap Institute & Louisiana State University chen@bit.csc.lsu.edu, chen](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071807/56649e945503460f94b991b9/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Important Issues to be Studied• Data Model for the Semantic Web
– An architectural plan of data models (including • Modifications of existing models
• A new XML data model?
• An ERM for XLink?
• Multi-level of data models
– Cleaning up theoretical problems of current RDF model
– Identification of mapping between ERM’s (for the near term, RDF) and XML tree structures
– Design Mechanisms to capture missing semantic information from ERM’s (RDF) to XML tree structures
• Schema Issues– Simpler
– Unified Syntax
– Semantics Rich
– Growth Plans for Full ERM capabilities
![Page 7: Critical Issues of XML Schema & RDF & Suggested Solutions Peter P. Chen Bootstrap Institute & Louisiana State University chen@bit.csc.lsu.edu, chen](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071807/56649e945503460f94b991b9/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
How the Suggested Solution Might Solve the Concerns of Microsoft and Others (A)
• Microsoft seems to recognize the value of using an ER model as RDF model is fineSuggested Solutions:
– An architectural plan of data models including:• Modifications of existing models
• A new XML data model?
• An ERM for XLink?
• Multi-level of data models
– Cleaning up theoretical problems of current RDF model
![Page 8: Critical Issues of XML Schema & RDF & Suggested Solutions Peter P. Chen Bootstrap Institute & Louisiana State University chen@bit.csc.lsu.edu, chen](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071807/56649e945503460f94b991b9/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
How the Suggested Solution Might Solve the Concerns of Microsoft and Others (B)
• Microsoft seems to object to the RDF schema specifications that did not rely on existing XML infrastructures
Suggested solutions: – simplified, unified, & semantically richer syntax
– Specify mappings between RDF and XML Schema
– Design Mechanisms to capture missing semantic information from ERM’s (RDF) to XML tree structures
– Growth Plans for Full ERM capabilities