critical study on ku aghna mah ka ya of charaka...
TRANSCRIPT
AAMJ / Vol. 2 / Issue 4 / July – August 2016
A A M J Anveshana Ayurveda Medical Journal
www.aamj.in ISSN: 2395-4159
Research Article
Critical study on Kuṣṭaghna Mahākaṣāya of
Charaka Samhita
Somil Dubey 1 Deepti 2 G. Rama Mohan Rao 3
A b s t r a c t
Kuṣṭa (obstinate skin diseases including leprosy) is the disease which causes discon-
tinuation and discoloration of skin. All skin diseases and almost all diseases that afflict
skin are classified under the single heading Twagāmaya’. Kuṣṭa occurs due to vitia-
tion of three doṣas (humors) and four dhātus (Twak, māmsa, Rakta, ambu). Though all
types of Kuṣṭas are due to vitiation of above seven factors, predominance of specific
doṣas results in difference of signs and symptoms. Acharya Charaka mentioned 50
Mahākaṣāya kalpanās (decoctions) in Sūtra sthāna 4th chapter Śadvirechanaśatāś-
ritīya adhyāya. Among these Acharya has mentioned Kuṣṭaghna mahākaṣāya (Anti-
dermatosis, anti-leprotic decoction) comprising group of ten drugs. An attempt is made
to study individual property of each drug from nighantus and to understand their ac-
tion on various Kuṣṭas according to their rasapanchaka.
Key words: Kuṣṭa, Mahākaṣāya kalpanās (decoction), Kuṣṭaghna māhakaṣāya (anti-
lepromatous).
1 PG Scholar, 2 Professor and H.O.D, Department of Rasa Śastra and Bhaiśajya Kalpanā, S.V.
Ayurvedic College, Tirupati, A.P. (India). 3 PhD Scholar, Department of Botany, Government Model Science College, Jabalpur, M.P.
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Dr. SOMIL DUBEY
PG Scholar, Department of Rasa Śastra and Bhaiśajya Kalpanā,
S.V. Ayurvedic College, Tirupati,
Andhra Pradesh. (India).
Email: [email protected]
Somil et.al,.: Critical study on Kuṣṭaghna Mahākaṣāya of Charaka Samhita
AAMJ / Vol. 2 / Issue 4 / July – August 2016 825
INTRODUCTION
he word Kuṣṭa is derived from the root ‘Kuṣ’ which
means that the one which comes out from the inner
part to the outer part. When the vitiated three
doṣas disturb the four body elements i.e. tvak (skin),
rakta (blood), māmsa (muscle tissue) and ambu (lym-
phatic fluid) together they manifest themselves on the
skin and makes it ‘Kutsit’ (contemptible i.e. disgraceful).
The whole body becomes despised therefore it is called
as ‘Kuṣtha’.
Kuṣṭa is noted as one of the eight ‘Aṣtau Mahāgada’
(Cha.In.9/8). Sushrutacharya said that, Kuṣṭa does not
leave one’s body even if that person leaves this world[i].
It is important to study in detail about such mahāgada
i.e. kuṣṭa and its types in detail.
In ayurveda all the skin diseases are described under
one term ‘twagāmaya’. These are produced invariably
by the vitiation of seven factors i.e. three doṣas and
four dūṣyas. But depending upon the ‘Doṣa-amśamś-
kalpanā’ (predominance of one or other fraction of
three doṣas in manifestation of disease) difference is
found in Vedana (discomfort), Varna (discolouration),
Samsthāna (shape), Prabhāva (specific manifestation),
nāma (name), chikitsa (treatment). Hence Kuṣṭa is clas-
sified into 7, 18 or uncountable types[ii]. All most all
Acharyas described 7 Mahākuṣṭas (major types) and
11 Kṣudrakuṣṭas (minor types) which differ in nomencla-
ture and description. The two main types are:
Mahākuṣṭa
Kṣudrakuṣṭa
Acharya Charaka has mentioned fifty mahākaṣāyas
(decoctions) in Sūtra Sthāna 4th chapter Śadvirechana-
śatāśritīya adhyāya[iii]. While concluding these he men-
tioned that these fifty important groups of decoction are
further divided into ten each thereby constituting five
hundred decoctions- such grouping is for the conven-
ience of description; there is no limit to the detailed de-
scription of these decoctions. Again, too much of con-
ciseness will not be conducive to the understanding of
disciples of lower intelligence, so the description pro-
vided in this chapter is neither too brief nor too elabo-
rate. With a view to guide the disciples of lower intelli-
gence and also to stimulate the imaginative power of
the wise, these fifty groups of decoctions have been
explained. The one who is acquainted with the internal
use as well as external application and prescription by
combination of ail these drugs, alone is the real physi-
cian [iv]. Acharya has mentioned Kuṣṭghna Mahāka-
śāya, although he has not mentioned its use according
the predominance of doṣas involved in kuṣṭa, here indi-
vidual properties of each drug is studied from nighantus
to know their doṣa hara effect on various kuṣṭas and
also to know their other gunas relevant to their
kuṣṭahara effect.
Review of literature:
Khadira (Acacia catechu), Abhaya (Terminali chebula),
Āmalakī (Emblica officinalis), Haridra (Curcuma longa),
Aruśkara (Semecarpus anacardium), Saptaparnah
(Alstonia scholaris), Ārgavadha (Casia fistula), Karvīra
(Nerium odorum), Vidanga (Embelia ribes), Jātipravala
(Jasminum grandiflorum) are grouped as Kuṣṭghna
Mahākaṣāya[v] by Acharya Charaka. Individual proper-
ties of each drug are as follows-
1. Khadira (Latin name- Acacia catechu, family- Mi-
mosaceae) - It is Tikta (bitter), Kaṣāya (astringent) in
rasa (taste), laghu (easily digestible), rūkṣa (dry) in
guna (properties), shīta (cold) in vīrya (potency),
pacifies Kapha-pitta. It has kuṣṭaghna (anti-leprotic),
krimighna (anti-helmintic), świtraghna (cures vitil-
ligo), śothaghna (reduces odema), and, raktavi-
kārahara (purifies blood) actions[vi]. Dhanvantari
Nighantu mentioned it be kandughna (anti-
pruritic).[vii]
2. Abhaya (Latin name-Terminalia chebula, family-
Combretaceae) - It has all five rasas except lavana
rasa (salt). It is laghu (easily digestible), rūkṣa (dry)
in guna, Uṣna (hot) in vīrya, It has Kuṣṭaghna,
Śothaghna, krimighna and, kandughna proper-
ties[viii]. Tridoṣahara (pacifies all three humors).[ix]
3. Āmalakī (Latin name-Emblica officinalis, family- Eu-
phorbiaceae)-It has all the properties like Haritaki
except that it is Śīta in vīrya. It is Rasāyana (rejuve-
nating), vriśya (aphrodiasiac), kuṣṭahara.[x]
4. Haridra (Latin name- Curcuma longa, family-
Zingiberaceae) - It posses Katu (pungent), tikta (bit-
ter) rasa. Rūkṣa (dry) in guna, uṣna (hot) in vīrya,
pacifies Kapha-pitta, It is varnya (improves com-
plexion of body), twakdoṣahara (alleviates skin
problems), vranaropana (heals wounds).[xi] Dhan-
vantari Nighantu has mentioned it to be Kan-
dughna, kuṣṭaghna, krimihara, viśahara (anti-
poisonous), viśodhini (purifies body).[xii] 5. Aruśkara (Bhilawa) (Latin name-Semecarpus ana-
cardium, family- Anacardiaceae) - Kaṣāya (astrin-
gent), madhura (sweet) in rasa, laghu in guna, uṣna
in vīrya, pacifies Vāta- kapha, kuṣṭghna,
świtraghna, krimighna, vrana ropana (wound heal-
ing) in action[xiii]. Dhanwantari nighantu has men-
tioned its rasa as katu, tikta, madhura.[xiv]
6. Saptaparnah (Latin name- Alstonia scholaris, family-
Apocynaceae) - It posses tikta, kaṣāya rasa, laghu,
snighda (unctuous) and sara (mobility) guna, uṣna
T
Somil et.al,.: Critical study on Kuṣṭaghna Mahākaṣāya of Charaka Samhita
AAMJ / Vol. 2 / Issue 4 / July – August 2016 826
vīrya[xv] (JLN page no. 326), vāta- kaphahara,
Kuṣṭaghna, raktavikāra hara in action.[xvi]
7. Ārgavadha (Latin name- Casia fistula, family- Fa-
baceae)- It has Madhura rasa, guru and sransrana
(mild laxative) guna, śīta in vīrya, pacifies Kapha-
pitta, Kuṣṭghna and also said to be ‘Koṣṭa shudha
karmam param’. (Best among all laxatives)[xvii],
Tridoṣahara.[xviii]
8. Karvīra (rakta karvīra) (Latin name-Nerium odourm,
family-Apocynaceae)- It is tikta, kaṣāya, katu in
rasa, laghu, rūkṣa in guna, uṣna in vīrya, pacifies
kapha-vāta. It is vranaropana, kuṣṭghna,
krimighna, kandughna.[xix]
9. Vidanga- (Latin name- Embelia ribes, family-
Myrsinaceae) - It is Katu in rasa, tikshna, rūkṣa,
laghu in guna, uṣna in vīrya, pacifies Vāta-kapha,
krimighna, kuṣṭghna in action.[xx]
10. Jātipravala- (Latin name-Jasminum grandifolium,
family- Oleaceae) – It is tikta, kaṣāya in rasa, laghu
in guna, uṣna in vīrya, vātahara (pacifies Vāta),
viśaghna, kuṣṭaghna, rakta vikāra hara[xxi], Dhan-
wantari nighantu has mentioned it as Kapha-
pittahara and kuṣṭaghna.[xxii]
OBSERVATIONS AND RESULTS:
Although Kuṣṭas are caused due to vitiation of all three
doṣas but based on dominance of doṣas involved they
are classified as follows:
Table No 1: Showing relation between doṣas and
Kuṣṭas[xxiii]:
Sr.No. Doshic pre-
dominance Name of Kuṣṭa
1. Vāta Kapāla
2. Pitta Audambara
3. Kapha Mandala, Vicharchika
4. Vāta-kapha
Sidhma, Ekakuṣṭa, Ala-
saka, Charmākhya,
Kitibha, Vipādika
5. Vāta-pitta Rishyajihva
6. Kapha-pitta
Pundarīka, Dadru, Char-
madala, Pāma, Vispotaka,
Satāru
7. Sannipātika Kākanaka
Table No 2: Showing effect of each drug of Kuṣṭaghna mahākaṣāya on various types of kuṣṭa:
Based on the rasapanchaka of drugs involved in Kuṣṭaghna mahākaṣāyas their probable action on particular kuṣṭa can
be tabulated as follows:
Sr.No. Name of the
drug
Dosha hara
property Karma Action on type of Kuṣṭa
1. Khadira Kapha-
pittahara
Kuṣṭaghna, krimighna Świtraghna,
Śothaghna, raktavikārahara
Pundarīka, Dadru, Charmadala,
Pāma, Vispotaka, Satāru
2. Abhaya Tridoṣahara Kuṣṭaghna, Śothaghna, krimighna,
kandughna On major types of Kuṣṭa
3. Āmalakī Tridoṣahara Rasāyana, vriśya On major types of Kuṣṭa
4. Haridra Kapha-
pittahara
Kandughna, kuṣṭaghna, krimihara,
viśahara, viśodhini, vranaropana
Pundarīka, Dadru, Charmadala,
Pāma, Vispotaka, Satāru
5. Aruśkara Vāta- kapha-
hara
Kuṣṭaghna, świtraghna, krimighna,
vrana ropana
Sidhma, Ekakuṣṭa, Alasaka, Char-
mākhya, Kitibha, Vipādika, Vichar-
chika
6. Saptaparnah Vāta- kapha-
hara Kuṣṭaghna, raktavikāra hara
Sidhma, Ekakuṣṭa, Alasaka, Char-
mākhya, Kitibha, Vipādika
7. Ārgavadha
Kapha-
pittahara
Tridoṣahara
Kuṣṭaghna Pundarīka, Dadru, Charmadala,
Pāma, Vispotaka, Satāru
8. Karvīra Vāta- kapha-
hara
Vranaropana, kuṣṭaghna,
krimighna, kandughna
Sidhma, Ekakuṣṭa, Alasaka, Char-
mākhya, Kitibha, Vipādika
9. Vidanga Vāta-
kaphahara Krimighna, kuṣṭaghna
Sidhma, Ekakuṣṭa, Alasaka, Char-
mākhya, Kitibha, Vipādika
10. Jātipravala Kapha-
pittahara
Viśaghna, kuṣṭaghna, rakta vikāra
hara
Pundarīka, Dadru, Charmadala,
Pāma, Vispotaka, Satāru
Somil et.al,.: Critical study on Kuṣṭaghna Mahākaṣāya of Charaka Samhita
AAMJ / Vol. 2 / Issue 4 / July – August 2016 827
DISCUSSION
All the skin inflictions in ayurveda are described under
one heading called twagāmaya. Acharya Charaka in
nidana sthāna mentioned that depending upon the
permutation and combination of the various fractions of
doṣas and their location in the body, there is variation
in the pain, colour, shape, specific manifestations,
name, and treatment of the various types of Kuṣṭa even
they are produced by the same types of causative fac-
tors. They can be of seven types, eighteen types or in-
numerable types. Although Acharya charaka while
mentioning Kuṣṭghna mahākaṣāyas hasn’t described
use of particular drug in specific types of kuṣṭa. Still by
knowing rasapanchaka and other properties of drugs
they can be used in better and efficient way in various
types of kuṣṭa. Drugs involved in this mahākaṣāya are
having Kuṣṭaghna (anti-dermatosis, anti-leprotic),
krimighna (anti-helmintic), Świtraghna (cures vitilligo),
Śothaghna (relives odema), raktavikārahara (purifies
blood), vranaropana (wound healing), viśaghna (anti-
poisnous) properties. By knowing the predominace of
doṣas and other associated symptoms in kuṣṭa various
other combinations within the mahākaṣāya can be
made.
Kuṣṭas caused by predominance of Vāta-kapha viz Sid-
hma, Ekakuṣṭa, Alasaka, Charmākhya, Kitibha, and
Vipādika can be treated by choosing drugs pacifying
Vāta-kapha from the above mahākaṣāya can be
choosen (Aruśkara, Saptaparnah, Karavīra, Vidanga).
Similarly for Pitta-kapha types of kuṣṭa viz Pundarīka,
Dadru, Charmadala, Pāma, Vispotaka, Satāru, drugs
having Pitta-kahpahara properties can be chosen
(Khadira, Haridra, Ārgavadha, Jātipravala). Acharya
Charaka has mentioned that there is no Kapha disorder
that cannot be treated by Aruśkara, so particularly talk-
ing about Vicharchika it can be efficiently managed by
using Aruśkara.
Abhaya and Āmalakī are Tridoṣahara so they can be
used in all types of kuṣṭa vikāras. Although Kākanaka
variety of kuṣṭa is mentioned to be asadhya but still by
their tridoṣahara action, rasāyana properties better
management to poor prognostic cases can be provided.
While describing Pachavidha kaṣāya kalpanās
Acharya Charaka has mentioned that all the prepara-
tions are not useful in all cases as these preparation
should be prescribed with due regard to the strength of
the patient and seriousness of the disease. So, in order
to get optimum results from above drugs they can be
prescribed by knowing the bala of patient by assisting
the prakruti and also by better implementation of
nidana panchaka.
CONCLUSION
Kuṣṭa occurs due to vitiation of three doṣas and four
dhātus. Depending upon the permutation and combina-
tion of the various fractions of doṣas kuṣṭas are classi-
fied seven types, eighteen types or innumerable types.
Kuṣṭaghna mahākaṣāya mentioned by acharya
charaka comprises of ten drugs all having Kuṣṭaghna,
krimighna properties. After studying their individual
properties from nighantus their rasapanchaka and other
pharmacological properties were assessed basing on
this their action on various types of kuṣṭa was studied to
understand better implementation of mahākaṣāya.
ΛΛΛΛ
Somil et.al,.: Critical study on Kuṣṭaghna Mahākaṣāya of Charaka Samhita
AAMJ / Vol. 2 / Issue 4 / July – August 2016 828
REFERENCES
i. Ayurveda Tattva Sandipika by Ambika Dutta Shastri, Sus-
ruta Samhita of Mahārasi Susruta, Reprint edition,
Chaukhambha Sanskrit Sansthan, Varanasi, Nidana
Sthāna 5/30, Kustha Nidana, 2012, pg. no. 324.
ii. Pandit K Shastri, Charaka Samhita of Agnivesha, Reprint
edition, Chaukhambha Sanskrit Sansthan, Varanasi,
Nidana Sthāna 5/4, Kustha Nidana, 2012, pg. no.
512.
iii. Pandit K Shastri, Charaka Samhita of Agnivesha, Reprint
edition, Chaukhambha Sanskrit Sansthan, Varanasi, Su-
tra Sthāna 4/8, śadvirechanaśatāśritīya adhyāya, 2012,
pg. no. 58.
iv. R.K. Sharma and Bhagwan Das, Charaka Samhita of
Agnivesa, Reprint edition, Chowkhamba Sanskrit Series
Office, Varasnasi, Sutra Sthāna 4/23-29, śadvirechana-
śatāśritīya adhyāya, 2012, pg. no. 103.
v. Pandit K Shastri, Charaka Samhita of Agnivesha, Reprint
edition, Chaukhambha Sanskrit Sansthan, Varanasi, Su-
tra Sthāna 4/13, śadvirechanaśatāśritīya adhyāya,
2012, pg. no. 62.
vi. Prof. K.C. Chunekar, Bhavaprakasha Nighantu of Sri
Bhavamishra, Revised edition, Chaukhambha bharati
Academy, Varanasi, Vātadi Varga sloka no. 30-32,
2013, pg. no. 513.
vii. Dr. S.D. Kamat, Studies On Medicinal Plants and Drugs
in Dhanvantari Nighantu, Chaukhambha Surbharati
Prakashan, Varanasi, Guduchyadi Varga 1/25-26,
2010, pg. no. 9.
viii. Prof. K.C. Chunekar, Bhavaprakasha Nighantu of Sri
Bhavamishra, Revised edition, Chaukhambha bharati
Academy, Varanasi, Haritkyadi varga sloka no. 19-26,
2013, pg. no. 5.
ix. Dr. S.D. Kamat, Studies On Medicinal Plants and Drugs
in Dhanvantari Nighantu, Chaukhambha Surbharati
Prakashan, Varanasi, Guduchyadi Varga. 1/212, 2010,
pg. no. 76.
x. Prof. K.C. Chunekar, Bhavaprakasha Nighantu of Sri
Bhavamishra, Revised edition, Chaukhambha bharati
Academy, Varanasi, Haritkyadi varga sloka no. 38-41,
2013, pg. no. 10.
xi. Prof. K.C. Chunekar, Bhavaprakasha Nighantu of Sri
Bhavamishra, Revised edition, Chaukhambha bharati
Academy, Varanasi, Haritkyadi varga sloka no.196-197,
2013, pg. no. 110.
xii. Dr. S.D. Kamat, Studies On Medicinal Plants and Drugs
in Dhanvantari Nighantu, Chaukhambha Surbharati
Prakashan, Varanasi, Guduchyadi Varga. 1/54-56,
2010, pg. no. 19-20.
xiii. Prof. K.C. Chunekar, Bhavaprakasha Nighantu of Sri
Bhavamishra, Revised edition, Chaukhambha bharati
Academy, Varanasi, Haritkyadi varga sloka no. 232,
2013, pg. no. 133.
xiv. Dr. S.D. Kamat, Studies On Medicinal Plants and Drugs
in Dhanvantari Nighantu, Chaukhambha Surbharati
Prakashan, Varanasi, Chandandi Varga. 3/129-130,
2010, pg. no. 259.
xv. Sharma, 1978; B.N., 1982, Dravya Guna Vijnana Vol-II
by Dr. J.L.N. Sastry page no. 326.
xvi. Prof. K.C. Chunekar, Bhavaprakasha Nighantu of Sri
Bhavamishra, Revised edition, Chaukhambha bharati
Academy, Varanasi, Vātadi Varga sloka no. 75, 2013,
pg. no. 534.
xvii. Prof. K.C. Chunekar, Bhavaprakasha Nighantu of Sri
Bhavamishra, Revised edition, Chaukhambha bharati
Academy, Varanasi, Haritkyadi Varga sloka no. 148-
150, 2013, pg. no. 65-66.
xviii. Dr. S.D. Kamat, Studies On Medicinal Plants and Drugs
in Dhanvantari Nighantu, Chaukhambha Surbharati
Prakashan, Varanasi, Guduchyadi Varga. 1/223-224,
2010, pg. no. 80.
xix. Prof. K.C. Chunekar, Bhavaprakasha Nighantu of Sri
Bhavamishra, Revised edition, Chaukhambha bharati
Academy, Varanasi, Guduchyadi Varga sloka no.82-83,
2013, pg. no. 300.
xx. Prof. K.C. Chunekar, Bhavaprakasha Nighantu of Sri
Bhavamishra, Revised edition, Chaukhambha bharati
Academy, Varanasi, Haritkyadi Varga sloka no.111-
112, 2013, pg. no. 50.
xxi. Prof. K.C. Chunekar, Bhavaprakasha Nighantu of Sri
Bhavamishra, Revised edition, Chaukhambha bharati
Academy, Varanasi, Puspa Varga sloka no.27-28,
2013, pg. no. 477.
xxii. Dr. S.D. Kamat, Studies On Medicinal Plants and Drugs
in Dhanvantari Nighantu, Chaukhambha Surbharati
Prakashan, Varanasi, Aamradi Varga. 5/132-134,
2010, pg. no. 496.
xxiii. Pandit K Shastri, Charaka Samhita of Agnivesha, Reprint
edition, Chaukhambha Sanskrit Sansthan, Varanasi,
Chikitsa Sthāna 7/28-30, Kustha chikitsa, 2012, pg. no.
204.
Source of Support: Nil.
Conflict of Interest: None declared
ΛΛΛΛ
How to cite this article: Somil et.al,.: Critical study on
Kuṣṭaghna Mahākaṣāya of Charaka Samhita. AAMJ
2016; 4:824 – 828