critical thinking subcommittee of the april 19, 2011
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Critical Thinking Subcommittee of the April 19, 2011](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062500/5697bf8d1a28abf838c8c36e/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Critical Thinking Subcommittee of the
April 19, 2011
![Page 2: Critical Thinking Subcommittee of the April 19, 2011](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062500/5697bf8d1a28abf838c8c36e/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Critical Thinking Subcommittee
Provide added scrutiny and emphasis on critical thinking assessments.
Review institutional data from critical thinking assessments and identify goals and objectives to improve student learning.
![Page 3: Critical Thinking Subcommittee of the April 19, 2011](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062500/5697bf8d1a28abf838c8c36e/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
QEC Met February 18
QEP Overview/Highlights Focus Activity Next Meeting
Friday, September 2, 9:00-11:00 a.m., EpiCenter – 2-304
![Page 4: Critical Thinking Subcommittee of the April 19, 2011](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062500/5697bf8d1a28abf838c8c36e/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Newcomers
QEC Faculty Co-ChairsMatthew Bodie
Tarpon Springs Campus Librarian
David MonroeEthics Faculty Member
Assessment CoordinatorAshley Hendrickson
![Page 5: Critical Thinking Subcommittee of the April 19, 2011](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062500/5697bf8d1a28abf838c8c36e/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
InitiativesAssessment
Critical Thinking Resources
Professional
Development
Student Success
![Page 6: Critical Thinking Subcommittee of the April 19, 2011](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062500/5697bf8d1a28abf838c8c36e/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
2011 Faculty ChampionsLynn Grinnell – College of Business
Nathan Heinze & Ron Greenwald – Computer and Information Technology
Bob Hudson & Greg Lewis – Engineering Technology
Shirley Collar – Health Information Management
Brandy Stark – Humanities & Fine Arts
Jim Rutledge & Carol Weideman – Mathematics
Carol Rasor – Public Safety Administration
Beth Carlson – Sign Language Interpretation
George Greenlee – Social & Behavioral Sciences
![Page 7: Critical Thinking Subcommittee of the April 19, 2011](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062500/5697bf8d1a28abf838c8c36e/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
![Page 8: Critical Thinking Subcommittee of the April 19, 2011](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062500/5697bf8d1a28abf838c8c36e/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
![Page 9: Critical Thinking Subcommittee of the April 19, 2011](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062500/5697bf8d1a28abf838c8c36e/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Fall Critical Thinking InstituteFriday, September 23Clearwater Campus
![Page 10: Critical Thinking Subcommittee of the April 19, 2011](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062500/5697bf8d1a28abf838c8c36e/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
![Page 11: Critical Thinking Subcommittee of the April 19, 2011](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062500/5697bf8d1a28abf838c8c36e/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Focus Activity
Keeping It GoingIntegration
with CETL
Assessment
![Page 12: Critical Thinking Subcommittee of the April 19, 2011](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062500/5697bf8d1a28abf838c8c36e/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Focus Activity
Keeping It GoingIntegration
with CETL
Assessmentshow what we have done
apply to what student is learningCAT-ARC-CCSSE data
evidence-based teachingcritical thinking
encourage facultymini-grants
publishlearning/sharing
sharing and linkinglearning resources/commons
different courses/departments
![Page 13: Critical Thinking Subcommittee of the April 19, 2011](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062500/5697bf8d1a28abf838c8c36e/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
CATCritical Thinking Assessment Test Randomly-selected STA 2023 and MAC
1105 each spring semester Scoring Workshop
Friday, June 3, 8:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.DO-102 - Consular Conference Room
![Page 14: Critical Thinking Subcommittee of the April 19, 2011](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062500/5697bf8d1a28abf838c8c36e/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
ARCAssessment Rubric for Critical Thinking Ethics’ Critical Thinking Application
Paper (CTAP) Randomly-selected PHI 1600 each fall
semester Scoring Workshop
Friday, November 18, 8:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.DO-102 - Consular Conference Room
![Page 15: Critical Thinking Subcommittee of the April 19, 2011](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062500/5697bf8d1a28abf838c8c36e/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Reflection – From a Student We learned that there are often many
solutions to a given problem. In problem solving you must consider what the best option is given the scenario. Then consider the possible outcomes based on the decision that was made. There may be a few drawbacks to any decision, but you must make the choice based on which option does the most good with the least harm.
![Page 16: Critical Thinking Subcommittee of the April 19, 2011](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062500/5697bf8d1a28abf838c8c36e/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Reflection – From Faculty Realize that teaching critical thinking is
not a single “intervention.” It is a commitment to incorporating modeling and teaching critical thinking wherever the opportunities present themselves.
![Page 17: Critical Thinking Subcommittee of the April 19, 2011](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062500/5697bf8d1a28abf838c8c36e/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Enhancing student learning by
Improving students’ ability to think critically