crlecture asdasd

Upload: alina-malik

Post on 03-Apr-2018

224 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/28/2019 CRlecture asdasd

    1/13

    Lahore School of Economics

    Credit Ratings

    MBA Finance Lahore School of Economics [Spring 2013]

  • 7/28/2019 CRlecture asdasd

    2/13

    Lahore School of Economics

    Credit Ratings The Concept

    The credit rating is a symbolic indicator of the current opinion of therelative capability of the issuer to service its debt obligation.

    It enables the investor to differentiate between debt instrumentson the basis of their underlying credit quality

    It is focused on communicating to the investors , the relativeranking of the default loss probability for a given fixed incomeinvestment , in comparison with other rated instruments.

    Credit ratings is an opinion about the credit quality of a debtinstrument and is not a recommendation to buy or sell.

    Credit ratings are generally based on publicly available information

    and thus such opinions are subject to certain givens.

  • 7/28/2019 CRlecture asdasd

    3/13

    Lahore School of Economics

    Credit Ratings The Concept

    In determining a rating , both quantitative and qualitative analysesare employed. The judgment is qualitative in nature and the role of

    the quantitative analysis is to help make the best possible overallqualitative judgment because, ultimately , a rating is an opinion.

    Standard and Poors

    A rating is an opinion on the future ability and legal obligation of theissuer to make timely payments of principal and interest on aspecific fixed income security.

    Moodys

    Why Credit Ratings?

    The main motivation for the establishment of rating agencies isthe recognition of their critical role in promoting bond or otherfixed income securities markets.

  • 7/28/2019 CRlecture asdasd

    4/13

    Lahore School of Economics

    Credit Ratings The Benefits

    Benefits for Investors Ratings are taken as risk level associated with the fixed

    income securities thus constituting an input for theinvestment decision.

    Banks use ratings to support their own lending/investing

    decisions. corporate treasurers are also using ratings to evaluate the

    credit risk of banks, securities firms, and othercounterparties that offer swap transaction.

    Benefits for Issuers

    Low effective cost of raising debt. Benefits for Regulators

    Financial Institutions are obligated to have credit ratingsfrom a recognised agency.

  • 7/28/2019 CRlecture asdasd

    5/13

    Lahore School of Economics

    Credit Ratings Benefit for

    Banks Banks could save capital, depending on the

    credit profile of their corporate exposures.

    If a bank has high-quality assets (for example, if

    the majority of its assets are in the 'AAA' and'AA' categories) it will save capital because oflow credit risk

    Capital required is computed as loan amount xrisk weight x 9 per cent

  • 7/28/2019 CRlecture asdasd

    6/13

    Lahore School of Economics

    Credit Ratings The Benefits

    Illustration of capital-savingpotential by bankson a loan of Rs.1000 Million

    Rating Basel I Basel II

    Risk weight Capital

    required1

    Risk weight Capital

    required

    Capital saved

    (rs. mn) (rs. mn)

    AAA 100% 90 20% 18 72

    AA 100% 90 30% 27 63

    A 100% 90 50% 45 45

    BBB 100% 90 100% 90 0

    BBand

    below

    100% 90 150% 135 (45)

    Click to edit Master text stylesSecond levelThird level

    Fourth levelFifth level

  • 7/28/2019 CRlecture asdasd

    7/13

    Lahore School of Economics

    Credit Ratings Rating

    Process Rating Process

    Rating Mandate

    Rating Team

    Review of Public

    Information Questionnaire

    Plant Visit/ManagementMeeting

    Information Receivedand Analyzed.

    Final ManagementMeeting

    Rating CommitteeMeeting

    Report Sent to Client

    Rating made public.

    Rating is an interactive processrelying primarily in gathering

    information from the issuer. The

    entire process is aimed atevaluating

    Financial Risk Funding Policies.

    Financial Flexibility.

    Business Risk Unsolicited ratings

  • 7/28/2019 CRlecture asdasd

    8/13

    Lahore School of Economics

    Credit Ratings Rating

    Process

    Funding Policies Future funding requirements Level of leveraging

    Views on retainingshareholding control Target returns for

    shareholders Views on interest rates Currency exposures

    including policies to controlthe currency risk

    Asset-liability tenurematching.

    Financial flexibility Past financial

    performance. Accounting quality.

    Indicators of financialperformance

    Profitability Level of leveraging Coverage ratios

    Liquidity position Cash flow analysis Future cash flow

    adequacy

  • 7/28/2019 CRlecture asdasd

    9/13

    Lahore School of Economics

    PACRA Rating Process

    Click to edit Master text stylesSecond levelThird level

    Fourth level

    Fifth level

  • 7/28/2019 CRlecture asdasd

    10/13

    Lahore School of Economics

    JCR-V I S Rat ing ProcessI ssuer/ Client 1. Signs agreement for an initial rating2. Submits preliminary information materialsJCR- VI S 3. Conducts a preliminary study

    4. Submits a detailed questionnaire to the issuer/client

    I ssuer/ Client 5. Provides detailed information in response to detailed questionnaireJCR- VI S 6. Conducts pre due diligence meeting analysis

    7. Conducts due diligence meetings4 - 5 w e e k s

    JCR- VI S 8. Conducts post due diligence analysis9. Brief for int ernal rating commit tee meetings is prepared

    10. Sub Committee recommends preliminary/initial rating

    11. Rating Comm itt ee decides the preliminary/ initial rating 12. Discusses the rating rationales and rating issues with client 13. Notifies issuer of the preliminary/initial rating, deliberates on appeals by client, ifan y

    I ssuer/ Client 14. Consents to release of preliminary/initial rating to the public in case of non-mandatory ratings

    JCR- VI S 15. Releases the preliminary/ initial rating to t he press2 - 3 w e ek

    Click to edit Master text styles

    Second levelThird level

    Fourth level

    Fifth level

  • 7/28/2019 CRlecture asdasd

    11/13

    Lahore School of Economics

    Click to edit Master text stylesSecond level

    Third level Fourth level

    Fifth level

  • 7/28/2019 CRlecture asdasd

    12/13

    Lahore School of Economics

    Short Term Ratings

    A1+ A1 A2 A3

    Long Term

    Ratings

    AAA

    AA+

    AA

    AA-

    A+

    A

    A- BBB+

    BBB

    BBB-

    BB+

  • 7/28/2019 CRlecture asdasd

    13/13

    Lahore School of Economics

    Rating Elements Indicative

    Weight

    1 Profitability / Performance 20.0%

    2 Credit Risk 25.0%

    3 Market Risk 5.0%

    4 Operational Risk 1.5%

    5 Funding 7.5%

    6 Liquidity (contingency) 2.5%

    7 Capital Structure 10.0%

    8 Franchise & Diversification 7.5%

    9 Management & Strategy 7.5%

    10 Economic Environment 2.5%

    11 Regulatory Environment 1.0%

    12 Size 5.0%

    13 Potential Support 5.0%

    100.0%

    Rating

    Categories

    Range (W.

    Score)

    7.5 Min. Max

    1 AAA 92.5 100

    2 AA+ 85.0 92.5

    3 AA 77.5 85.0

    4 AA- 70.0 77.5

    5 A+ 62.5 70.0

    6 A 55.0 62.5

    7 A- 47.5 55.08 BBB+ 40.0 47.5

    9 BBB 32.5 40.0

    10 BBB- 25.0 32.5