crlecture asdasd
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/28/2019 CRlecture asdasd
1/13
Lahore School of Economics
Credit Ratings
MBA Finance Lahore School of Economics [Spring 2013]
-
7/28/2019 CRlecture asdasd
2/13
Lahore School of Economics
Credit Ratings The Concept
The credit rating is a symbolic indicator of the current opinion of therelative capability of the issuer to service its debt obligation.
It enables the investor to differentiate between debt instrumentson the basis of their underlying credit quality
It is focused on communicating to the investors , the relativeranking of the default loss probability for a given fixed incomeinvestment , in comparison with other rated instruments.
Credit ratings is an opinion about the credit quality of a debtinstrument and is not a recommendation to buy or sell.
Credit ratings are generally based on publicly available information
and thus such opinions are subject to certain givens.
-
7/28/2019 CRlecture asdasd
3/13
Lahore School of Economics
Credit Ratings The Concept
In determining a rating , both quantitative and qualitative analysesare employed. The judgment is qualitative in nature and the role of
the quantitative analysis is to help make the best possible overallqualitative judgment because, ultimately , a rating is an opinion.
Standard and Poors
A rating is an opinion on the future ability and legal obligation of theissuer to make timely payments of principal and interest on aspecific fixed income security.
Moodys
Why Credit Ratings?
The main motivation for the establishment of rating agencies isthe recognition of their critical role in promoting bond or otherfixed income securities markets.
-
7/28/2019 CRlecture asdasd
4/13
Lahore School of Economics
Credit Ratings The Benefits
Benefits for Investors Ratings are taken as risk level associated with the fixed
income securities thus constituting an input for theinvestment decision.
Banks use ratings to support their own lending/investing
decisions. corporate treasurers are also using ratings to evaluate the
credit risk of banks, securities firms, and othercounterparties that offer swap transaction.
Benefits for Issuers
Low effective cost of raising debt. Benefits for Regulators
Financial Institutions are obligated to have credit ratingsfrom a recognised agency.
-
7/28/2019 CRlecture asdasd
5/13
Lahore School of Economics
Credit Ratings Benefit for
Banks Banks could save capital, depending on the
credit profile of their corporate exposures.
If a bank has high-quality assets (for example, if
the majority of its assets are in the 'AAA' and'AA' categories) it will save capital because oflow credit risk
Capital required is computed as loan amount xrisk weight x 9 per cent
-
7/28/2019 CRlecture asdasd
6/13
Lahore School of Economics
Credit Ratings The Benefits
Illustration of capital-savingpotential by bankson a loan of Rs.1000 Million
Rating Basel I Basel II
Risk weight Capital
required1
Risk weight Capital
required
Capital saved
(rs. mn) (rs. mn)
AAA 100% 90 20% 18 72
AA 100% 90 30% 27 63
A 100% 90 50% 45 45
BBB 100% 90 100% 90 0
BBand
below
100% 90 150% 135 (45)
Click to edit Master text stylesSecond levelThird level
Fourth levelFifth level
-
7/28/2019 CRlecture asdasd
7/13
Lahore School of Economics
Credit Ratings Rating
Process Rating Process
Rating Mandate
Rating Team
Review of Public
Information Questionnaire
Plant Visit/ManagementMeeting
Information Receivedand Analyzed.
Final ManagementMeeting
Rating CommitteeMeeting
Report Sent to Client
Rating made public.
Rating is an interactive processrelying primarily in gathering
information from the issuer. The
entire process is aimed atevaluating
Financial Risk Funding Policies.
Financial Flexibility.
Business Risk Unsolicited ratings
-
7/28/2019 CRlecture asdasd
8/13
Lahore School of Economics
Credit Ratings Rating
Process
Funding Policies Future funding requirements Level of leveraging
Views on retainingshareholding control Target returns for
shareholders Views on interest rates Currency exposures
including policies to controlthe currency risk
Asset-liability tenurematching.
Financial flexibility Past financial
performance. Accounting quality.
Indicators of financialperformance
Profitability Level of leveraging Coverage ratios
Liquidity position Cash flow analysis Future cash flow
adequacy
-
7/28/2019 CRlecture asdasd
9/13
Lahore School of Economics
PACRA Rating Process
Click to edit Master text stylesSecond levelThird level
Fourth level
Fifth level
-
7/28/2019 CRlecture asdasd
10/13
Lahore School of Economics
JCR-V I S Rat ing ProcessI ssuer/ Client 1. Signs agreement for an initial rating2. Submits preliminary information materialsJCR- VI S 3. Conducts a preliminary study
4. Submits a detailed questionnaire to the issuer/client
I ssuer/ Client 5. Provides detailed information in response to detailed questionnaireJCR- VI S 6. Conducts pre due diligence meeting analysis
7. Conducts due diligence meetings4 - 5 w e e k s
JCR- VI S 8. Conducts post due diligence analysis9. Brief for int ernal rating commit tee meetings is prepared
10. Sub Committee recommends preliminary/initial rating
11. Rating Comm itt ee decides the preliminary/ initial rating 12. Discusses the rating rationales and rating issues with client 13. Notifies issuer of the preliminary/initial rating, deliberates on appeals by client, ifan y
I ssuer/ Client 14. Consents to release of preliminary/initial rating to the public in case of non-mandatory ratings
JCR- VI S 15. Releases the preliminary/ initial rating to t he press2 - 3 w e ek
Click to edit Master text styles
Second levelThird level
Fourth level
Fifth level
-
7/28/2019 CRlecture asdasd
11/13
Lahore School of Economics
Click to edit Master text stylesSecond level
Third level Fourth level
Fifth level
-
7/28/2019 CRlecture asdasd
12/13
Lahore School of Economics
Short Term Ratings
A1+ A1 A2 A3
Long Term
Ratings
AAA
AA+
AA
AA-
A+
A
A- BBB+
BBB
BBB-
BB+
-
7/28/2019 CRlecture asdasd
13/13
Lahore School of Economics
Rating Elements Indicative
Weight
1 Profitability / Performance 20.0%
2 Credit Risk 25.0%
3 Market Risk 5.0%
4 Operational Risk 1.5%
5 Funding 7.5%
6 Liquidity (contingency) 2.5%
7 Capital Structure 10.0%
8 Franchise & Diversification 7.5%
9 Management & Strategy 7.5%
10 Economic Environment 2.5%
11 Regulatory Environment 1.0%
12 Size 5.0%
13 Potential Support 5.0%
100.0%
Rating
Categories
Range (W.
Score)
7.5 Min. Max
1 AAA 92.5 100
2 AA+ 85.0 92.5
3 AA 77.5 85.0
4 AA- 70.0 77.5
5 A+ 62.5 70.0
6 A 55.0 62.5
7 A- 47.5 55.08 BBB+ 40.0 47.5
9 BBB 32.5 40.0
10 BBB- 25.0 32.5