cro quality benchmarking – phase i service providers (8th edition)

11
CRO QUALITY BENCHMARKING – PHASE I SERVICE PROVIDERS (8th EDITION) MARCH, 2016 PREVIEW OF

Upload: industry-standard-research

Post on 11-Jan-2017

79 views

Category:

Health & Medicine


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: CRO Quality Benchmarking – Phase I  Service Providers   (8th EDITION)

CRO QUALITY BENCHMARKING – PHASE I SERVICE PROVIDERS (8th EDITION)

M A R C H , 2 0 1 6

P R E V I E W O F

Page 2: CRO Quality Benchmarking – Phase I  Service Providers   (8th EDITION)

REPORT OVERVIEW

HOW YOU CAN USE THIS REPORT

ISR’s “CRO Quality Benchmarking – Phase I Service Providers” report provides pharmaceutical sponsors and service providers a Consumer Reports-style analysis of CRO quality. Respondents supplied performance ratings based on their own experiences with 48 Phase I CROs, making this report the most comprehensive assessment of CRO service quality in the industry. Now in its 8th year, this report has become a crucial tool for sponsors looking to select a Phase I CRO and for service providers seeking an experience-based evaluation of their strengths and weaknesses.

D A T A C O L L E C T I O N

I N Q 3 - 4 , 2 0 1 5

3 0 - M I N U T E W E B - B A S E D

S U R V E Y

2 2 6 R E S P O N D E N T S F R O M U S , E U R O P E ,

A N D A S I A

187 PAGES

48 COMPANIES

VALUABLE FOR

MAJOR SECTIONS:1. Service Provider Selection

Process

2. Service Provider Perceptions and Interactions

3. Service Provider Performance and Loyalty

4. Company Service Quality Profiles

5. Study DataFOR PHARMA FOR CROSMake a more informed purchase of Phase I CRO services by understanding which service providers best fit your company’s needs.

Uncover your perceived strengths and weaknesses based on customer reviews, and compare your services to those of your competitors.

Introduction

SMARTER QUESTIONS SMARTER ANSWERS

Full list of companies included on next page.

STUDY SPONSORS• Make a more informed purchase of Phase I services

by understanding which service providers best fit your company’s needs

• Broaden your Phase I CRO evaluation list by accessing peer-based service quality ratings across 27 critical attributes

• Pinpoint potential delivery concerns early in a sponsor-CRO relationship in order to develop proactive strategies to address potential gaps

CLINICAL SERVICE PROVIDERS• Uncover your own — and competitor — delivery strengths

and weaknesses• Design messaging to tout your company’s strengths• Compete more effectively by understanding buyers’

selection criteria and outsourcing trends

CLINICAL OPERATIONS

OUTSOURCING

SERVICE PROVIDER MARKETING

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT

Page 3: CRO Quality Benchmarking – Phase I  Service Providers   (8th EDITION)

COMPANIES INCLUDED

ATTRIBUTES MEASURED

Accelovance

Algorithme Pharma

Bioskin

Biotrial

Celerion

CHDR

Chiltern

Clinical Research Services (CRS)

Clinlogix

Covance

DaVita Clinical Research

DCRI-Duke

Eurofins

Eurotrials

Frontage

HungaroTrial

ICON

Inamed

INC Research

inVentiv Health Clinical

KCR

Lambda

Medpace

Medsource

NAMSA

Novotech

Nuvisan

PAREXEL

Pharm-Olam International

PPD

PRA

ProTrials

QPS

Quintiles

Quotient Clinical

Rho

Sannova Analytical

SGS Life Sciences

Siro Clinpharm

Southern Star

Spaulding Clinical

SynteractHCR

Theorem

TKL Research

US Oncology

Vince & Associates

WCCT Global

Worldwide Clinical Trials

Introduction

SMARTER QUESTIONS SMARTER ANSWERS

BUDGET FACTORS • Low cost• Minimizing change orders

DELIVERY FACTORS• Access to patient populations• Clinic availability• Data quality• Easy to work with• Local market / Regulatory knowledge• Offered innovative solutions• Patient/volunteer recruitment• Technology for real-time access to

data• Up-front contingency planning, risk

management

TIMELINES MANAGEMENT• Meeting overall project timelines• Speed of site start-up

ORGANIZATION FACTORS• Access to “unique” tests, machines,

equipment• Access to a broad range of services • Financial strength / stability• Location of Phase I unit(s) in different

global regions• Location of Phase I unit(s) within your

country• Operational excellence

STAFF CHARACTERISTICS• Experience of the Phase I unit’s lead

investigator• Minimizing staff turnover• Project manager quality• Project team chemistry• Responsiveness• Scientific knowledge• Therapeutic expertise• Timely project communications

each company is evaluated

based on 27 CRITICAL ATTRIBUTES

data are included for all 48 CROs,

but companies with more

than 10 performance evaluations

(bold) receive a full profile

Companies listed bold have been reviewed by 10 or more respondents. These providers have in-depth performance analysis.

Page 4: CRO Quality Benchmarking – Phase I  Service Providers   (8th EDITION)

Introduction

SMARTER QUESTIONS SMARTER ANSWERS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOR FULL TABLE OF CONTENTS, PLEASE DOWNLOAD THE FULL PREVIEW AT:

HTTPS://WWW.ISRREPORTS.COM/REPORTS/CRO-QUALITY-BENCHMARKING-PHASE-I-SERVICE-PROVIDERS-8TH-EDITION/

Page 5: CRO Quality Benchmarking – Phase I  Service Providers   (8th EDITION)

Introduction

SMARTER QUESTIONS SMARTER ANSWERS

SERVICE PROVIDER PERFORMANCE AND LOYALTY

CRO Quality Benchmarking – Phase I Service Providers (8th edition) 29www.ISRreports.com ©2016

Figure 14 - Customer Loyalty: 3 Year Rolling AverageWithin the Phase I domain, CHDR, PPD, and Quintiles have shown consistently high loyalty ratings in both three-year rolling averages and 2016 scores� They are at the top in both analyses� Though Biotrial is near the top of the 3 year rolling average, its loyalty score this year is average� The companies with the lowest average scores are Medpace, Theorem, INC Research, and DCRI-Duke�

This is an analysis of service provider performance for those with 20 or more respondents rating over the past 3 years�

CROQUALITYBENCHMARKING–PHASEISERVICEPROVIDERS(8THEDITION) 31

Figure 15 - Customer Loyalty: 3 Year Rolling Average Within the Phase I domain, CHDR, PPD, and Quintiles have shown consistently high loyalty ratings in both three-year rolling averages and 2016 scores. They are at the top in both analyses. Though Biotrial is near the top of the 3 year rolling average, its loyalty score this year is average. The companies with the lowest average scores are Medpace, Theorem, INC Research, and DCRI-Duke. This is an analysis of service provider performance for those with 20 or more respondents rating over the past 3 years.

6.3

6.4

6.4

6.4

6.5

6.5

6.5

6.5

6.6

6.7

6.7

6.8

6.8

6.8

6.9

6.9

6.9

6.9

7.0

7.0

7.0

7.0

7.0

7.1

7.2

7.2

7.4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

DCRI-Duke (n=31)

INC Research (n=79)

Theorem (n=31)

Medpace (n=46)

Rho (n=22)

Frontage (n=23)

WCCT Global (n=46)

inVentiv Health Clinical (n=84)

PRA (n=113)

Clinical Research Services (CRS) (n=29)

US Oncology (n=30)

PAREXEL (n=183)

Industry Average

Eurofins (n=31)

Worldwide Clinical Trials (n=32)

ICON (n=133)

Covance (n=206)

Celerion (n=43)

Quotient Clinical (n=39)

DaVita Clinical Research (n=23)

Chiltern (n=28)

SGS Life Sciences (n=49)

Siro Clinpharm (n=20)

Quintiles (n=212)

PPD (n=150)

Biotrial (n=23)

CHDR (n=21)

Loyalty Score

© Industry Standard Research

S A M P L E P A G E :

CUSTOMER LOYALTYISR computes loyalty as an index that consists of Overall Satisfaction, Willingness to Recommend, and Likelihood to Use Again. ISR also looks at the 3 year rolling average for loyalty scores to understand whether there are differences in longer term scores compared to scores for only this year’s data.

The full data are available in the report, which can be downloaded from www.ISRreports.com.

This is an analysis of service provider performance for those with 20 or more

respondents rating over the past 3 years.

CROQUALITYBENCHMARKING–PHASEISERVICEPROVIDERS(8THEDITION) 31

Figure 15 - Customer Loyalty: 3 Year Rolling Average Within the Phase I domain, CHDR, PPD, and Quintiles have shown consistently high loyalty ratings in both three-year rolling averages and 2016 scores. They are at the top in both analyses. Though Biotrial is near the top of the 3 year rolling average, its loyalty score this year is average. The companies with the lowest average scores are Medpace, Theorem, INC Research, and DCRI-Duke. This is an analysis of service provider performance for those with 20 or more respondents rating over the past 3 years.

6.9

6.5

6.7

6.4

7.0

7.0

6.5

7.0

7.1

6.6

7.2

6.8

6.4

6.5

6.8

6.4

6.9

6.5

6.8

6.3

7.0

6.9

6.7

7.0

7.4

6.9

7.2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Worldwide Clinical Trials (n=32)

WCCT Global (n=46)

US Oncology (n=30)

Theorem (n=31)

Siro Clinpharm (n=20)

SGS Life Sciences (n=49)

Rho (n=22)

Quotient Clinical (n=39)

Quintiles (n=212)

PRA (n=113)

PPD (n=150)

PAREXEL (n=183)

Medpace (n=46)

inVentiv Health Clinical (n=84)

Industry Average

INC Research (n=79)

ICON (n=133)

Frontage (n=23)

Eurofins (n=31)

DCRI-Duke (n=31)

DaVita Clinical Research (n=23)

Covance (n=206)

Clinical Research Services (CRS) (n=29)

Chiltern (n=28)

CHDR (n=21)

Celerion (n=43)

Biotrial (n=23)

Loyalty Score

D A T A I N F U L L R E P O R T

CROQUALITYBENCHMARKING–PHASEISERVICEPROVIDERS(8THEDITION) 31

Figure 15 - Customer Loyalty: 3 Year Rolling Average Within the Phase I domain, CHDR, PPD, and Quintiles have shown consistently high loyalty ratings in both three-year rolling averages and 2016 scores. They are at the top in both analyses. Though Biotrial is near the top of the 3 year rolling average, its loyalty score this year is average. The companies with the lowest average scores are Medpace, Theorem, INC Research, and DCRI-Duke. This is an analysis of service provider performance for those with 20 or more respondents rating over the past 3 years.

6.9

6.5

6.7

6.4

7.0

7.0

6.5

7.0

7.1

6.6

7.2

6.8

6.4

6.5

6.8

6.4

6.9

6.5

6.8

6.3

7.0

6.9

6.7

7.0

7.4

6.9

7.2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Worldwide Clinical Trials (n=32)

WCCT Global (n=46)

US Oncology (n=30)

Theorem (n=31)

Siro Clinpharm (n=20)

SGS Life Sciences (n=49)

Rho (n=22)

Quotient Clinical (n=39)

Quintiles (n=212)

PRA (n=113)

PPD (n=150)

PAREXEL (n=183)

Medpace (n=46)

inVentiv Health Clinical (n=84)

Industry Average

INC Research (n=79)

ICON (n=133)

Frontage (n=23)

Eurofins (n=31)

DCRI-Duke (n=31)

DaVita Clinical Research (n=23)

Covance (n=206)

Clinical Research Services (CRS) (n=29)

Chiltern (n=28)

CHDR (n=21)

Celerion (n=43)

Biotrial (n=23)

Loyalty Score

CROQUALITYBENCHMARKING–PHASEISERVICEPROVIDERS(8THEDITION) 31

Figure 15 - Customer Loyalty: 3 Year Rolling Average Within the Phase I domain, CHDR, PPD, and Quintiles have shown consistently high loyalty ratings in both three-year rolling averages and 2016 scores. They are at the top in both analyses. Though Biotrial is near the top of the 3 year rolling average, its loyalty score this year is average. The companies with the lowest average scores are Medpace, Theorem, INC Research, and DCRI-Duke. This is an analysis of service provider performance for those with 20 or more respondents rating over the past 3 years.

6.9

6.5

6.7

6.4

7.0

7.0

6.5

7.0

7.1

6.6

7.2

6.8

6.4

6.5

6.8

6.4

6.9

6.5

6.8

6.3

7.0

6.9

6.7

7.0

7.4

6.9

7.2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Worldwide Clinical Trials (n=32)

WCCT Global (n=46)

US Oncology (n=30)

Theorem (n=31)

Siro Clinpharm (n=20)

SGS Life Sciences (n=49)

Rho (n=22)

Quotient Clinical (n=39)

Quintiles (n=212)

PRA (n=113)

PPD (n=150)

PAREXEL (n=183)

Medpace (n=46)

inVentiv Health Clinical (n=84)

Industry Average

INC Research (n=79)

ICON (n=133)

Frontage (n=23)

Eurofins (n=31)

DCRI-Duke (n=31)

DaVita Clinical Research (n=23)

Covance (n=206)

Clinical Research Services (CRS) (n=29)

Chiltern (n=28)

CHDR (n=21)

Celerion (n=43)

Biotrial (n=23)

Loyalty Score

Page 6: CRO Quality Benchmarking – Phase I  Service Providers   (8th EDITION)

Introduction

SMARTER QUESTIONS SMARTER ANSWERS

SERVICE PROVIDER PERFORMANCE AND LOYALTY

CRO Quality Benchmarking – Phase I Service Providers (8th edition) 25www.ISRreports.com ©2016

Figure 10 - Organization Factors

Ratings Key: Clear leadership Better than most About average Falling a bit short Likely deficiency

Access to a broad

range of services

Access to “unique”

tests, machines, equipment

Financial strength / stability

Location of Phase I unit(s)

in di�erent global regions

Location of Phase I unit(s)

within your country

Operational excellence

Algorithme Pharma

Biotrial

Celerion

CHDR

Chiltern

Covance

DaVita Clinical Research

Eurofins

ICON

INC Research

inVentiv Health Clinical

Lambda

Medpace

Novotech

PAREXEL

PPD

PRA

QPS

Quintiles

Quotient Clinical

Rho

SGS Life Sciences

SynteractHCR

Theorem

US Oncology

Vince & Associates

WCCT Global

Worldwide Clinical Trials

Ratings Key: Clear leadership Better than most About average Falling a bit short Likely deficiency

Low cost

Minimizing change orders

Algorithme Pharma

Biotrial

Celerion

CHDR

Chiltern

Covance

DaVita Clinical Research

Eurofins

ICON

INC Research

inVentiv Health Clinical

Lambda

Medpace

Novotech

PAREXEL

PPD

PRA

QPS

Quintiles

Quotient Clinical

Rho

SGS Life Sciences

SynteractHCR

Theorem

US Oncology

Vince & Associates

WCCT Global

Worldwide Clinical Trials© Industry Standard Research

Ratings Key: Clear leadership Better than most About average Falling a bit short Likely deficiency

Access to patient

populationsClinic

availabilityData

qualityEasy to

work with

Local market/

Regulatory knowledge

O�ered innovative solutions

Patient / volunteer

recruitment strategy

Technology for

real-time access to

data

Up-front contingency planning, risk management

Algorithme Pharma

Biotrial

Celerion

CHDR

Chiltern

Covance

DaVita Clinical Research

Eurofins

ICON

INC Research

inVentiv Health Clinical

Lambda

Medpace

Novotech

PAREXEL

PPD

PRA

QPS

Quintiles

Quotient Clinical

Rho

SGS Life Sciences

SynteractHCR

Theorem

US Oncology

Vince & Associates

WCCT Global

Worldwide Clinical Trials

S A M P L E P A G E :

SERVICE PROVIDER PERFORMANCEPart of the “Service Provider Performance and Loyalty” section, ISR provides an analysis of profiled companies’ service attribute ratings. This chart shows staff characteristics, but the report also includes ratings for: budget factors, delivery factors, organization factors, and timelines management.

The full data are available in the report, which can be downloaded from www.ISRreports.com.

Ratings Key: Clear leadership Better than most About average Falling a bit short Likely deficiency

Access to a broad

range of services

Access to “unique”

tests, machines, equipment

Financial strength / stability

Location of Phase I unit(s)

in di�erent global regions

Location of Phase I unit(s)

within your country

Operational excellence

Company A

Company B

Company C

Company D

Company E

Company F

Company G

Company H

Company I

Company J

Company K

Company L

Company M

Company N

Company O

Company P

Company Q

Company R

Company S

Company T

Company U

Company V

Company W

Company X

Company Y

Company Z

Company AA

Company BBD A T A H A V E B E E N R A N D O M I Z E D . F U L L C H A R T A V A I L A B L E I N T H E R E P O R T .

Page 7: CRO Quality Benchmarking – Phase I  Service Providers   (8th EDITION)

Introduction

SMARTER QUESTIONS SMARTER ANSWERS

S A M P L E P A G E : PHASE I COMPANY PROFILE

The Average Customer Experience section measures each company’s performance relative to expectations in each of the 27 attributes measured. For a list of attributes, refer to page three of this preview.

The Highlights section shows each company’s highest and lowest attributes, ranked by actual users.

The Customer Loyalty section measures overall satisfaction, likelihood to recommend, and likelihood to use again, compared to the industry average.

The Brand Snapshot section profiles awareness, familiarity, leadership, and use.

Companies with over 10 respondents are profiled.

Introduction

COMPANY SERVICE QUALITY PROFILES

CRO Quality Benchmarking – Phase I Service Providers (8th edition) 43www.ISRreports.com ©2016

BRAND SNAPSHOT

CUSTOMER LOYALTY

AVERAGE CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE

LAMBDA

TOP 3 ATTRIBUTES:Low cost

Responsiveness

Timely project communications

BOTTOM 3 ATTRIBUTES:Minimizing staff turnover

Technology for real-time access to data

Access to patient populations

HIGHLIGHTS

(N=10)

© Industry Standard Research

The Harvey Balls show each profiled provider’s rating across the ten most important attributes, relative to customer expectations�

This chart shows the profiled provider’s 2016 Customer Loyalty score in comparison to the 2016 industry average�

Therapeutic expertise

Experience of Phase I unit’s lead investigator

Scientific knowledge

Data quality

Access to patient populations

Low cost Meeting overall project timelines

Project manager quality

Easy to work with

Ratings Key: Clear leadership Better than most About average Falling a bit short Likely deficiency

Operational excellence

INDUSTRY AVERAGE

LAMBDA

7.0

6.9

AWARENESS 40%

FAMILIARITY 24%

USE 5%

LEADERSHIP 4%

SAMPLE COMPANY (N=45)

SAMPLE COMPANY

Page 8: CRO Quality Benchmarking – Phase I  Service Providers   (8th EDITION)

Introduction

SMARTER QUESTIONS SMARTER ANSWERS

FOR ADDITIONAL SAMPLE PAGES, PLEASE DOWNLOAD THE FULL PREVIEW AT:

HTTPS://WWW.ISRREPORTS.COM/REPORTS/CRO-QUALITY-BENCHMARKING-PHASE-I-SERVICE-PROVIDERS-8TH-EDITION/

Page 9: CRO Quality Benchmarking – Phase I  Service Providers   (8th EDITION)

Introduction

SMARTER QUESTIONS SMARTER ANSWERS

ORDERING INFORMATION

Industry Standard Research (ISR) is the premier, full service market research provider to the pharma and pharma services industries.  With over a decade of experience in the industry, ISR delivers an unmatched level of domain expertise.   For more information about our off-the-shelf intelligence and custom research offerings, please visit our Web site at www.ISRreports.com, email [email protected], or follow us on twitter @ISRreports.

ABOUT INDUSTRY STANDARD RESEARCH

>> R E G I S T E R N O W>>Receive $250 instant credit towards any ISR report

>>Earn 10% credit towards all future purchases

>>Receive advanced notifications on ISR’s latest reports and free resources

SAVE ON THIS, OR ANY ISR REPORT, BY CREATING A FREE ACCOUNT

FOR PRICING AND ORDERING INFORMATION, PLEASE DOWNLOAD THE FULL PREVIEW AT:

HTTPS://WWW.ISRREPORTS.COM/REPORTS/CRO-QUALITY-BENCHMARKING-PHASE-I-SERVICE-PROVIDERS-8TH-EDITION/

Page 10: CRO Quality Benchmarking – Phase I  Service Providers   (8th EDITION)

TO LEARN MORE: CONTACT US AT [email protected] OR +1(919)301-0106

Biosimilars & Biologics

Clinical Trial Recruitment &

Retention

Commercialization Department Models & Structures

Trends & Technologies

Manufacturing Service Provider Quality Benchmarking

CUSTOM RESEARCH

UNDERSTAND YOUR MARKETSLeverage ISR’s experience and institutional knowledge to create a fit-for-purpose market research project that addresses the business decisions you need to make.

Are you:• Developing a new product or service?• Evaluating a new market?• Targeting a new customer segment?• Entering a new geography?• Needing a deeper understanding of your

customer or potential customer base?

UNDERSTAND YOUR CUSTOMERSWho makes the decisions and in what contexts? ISR can help you gain a deeper understanding of your customers’ decision-making units (DMUs) and decision-making processes (DMPs).

Key Questions Addressed:• What motivates the purchase decision?• How are companies, products, solutions, and/or

brands evaluated?• What factors drive the final buying decision?• Where are your customers won or lost in the

purchasing process?• Why were specific opportunities won or lost?• How do you keep customers engaged and

manage their loyalty over time?

CUSTOM RESEARCH SERVICES• Investigator Forum• Brand, Advertising, and Message Testing• Loyalty Management• New Product and Service Development• Competitive Intelligence• Strategy War Games• MORE

S O M E T H I N G T O C O N S I D E R

DISTINCTIVE – Receive novel insights from industry decision-makers on topics including: service provider quality, patient recruitment, biosimilars, clinical technology, manufacturing, clinical operations, and commercial activities.

UNRESTRICTED – ISR doesn’t sell seats. Instantly obtain access for all employees within your organization

AFFORDABLE – Receive access to ALL reports in ISR’s library, as well as those released during your subscription period. ISR’s competitive library pricing equates to the cost of a few individual report purchases.

LIBRARY ACCESS SUBSCRIPTIONISR’s library access subscription provides your entire organization access to our full library of syndicated market research reports (100+ titles) plus access to all reports (~25 per year) released during your subscription period. Our research categories include:

Page 11: CRO Quality Benchmarking – Phase I  Service Providers   (8th EDITION)

Introduction

SMARTER QUESTIONS SMARTER ANSWERS

www.ISRreports.com ©2013 | Preview of: Benchmarking the Pharma Industry’s HEOR Functions 11

act with confidence

www.ISRreports.com ©2015 | Preview of: Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Disease and Pipeline Analysis 10

act with confidence

www.ISRreports.com ©2013 | Preview of: Benchmarking the Pharma Industry’s HEOR Functions 10

act with confidence

www.ISRreports.com ©2014 | Preview of: Benchmarking European Investigator Payments 10

act with confidence

www.ISRreports.com ©2013 | Preview of: Benchmarking the Pharma Industry’s HEOR Functions 10

act with confidence

The ISR DifferenceCustom-quality syndicated market research

www.ISRreports.com

ISR's Reports The Common Syndicated Reportvs.

How confident are you?

vs.Data Collection

ISR's proprietary data collection tools and channels support fast,

high quality data collection

Struggle to recruit the right targets and enough of them

vs.Sample Sizes

Robust sample sizes that instill confidence

Often insufficient industry representation that leaves you

defending results

vs.vs.Research methods

Mostly primary research;

always appropriate for the topic

One size fits all; usually publically

available data

vs.vs.Respondents

Sophisticated screening ensures genuine decision-makers

Undisclosed methodologies and

respondent demographics

vs.vs.Analysts

Decades of experience means more insights that are

immediately usable

Junior analysts capable of reporting numbers