crocker/riverside elementary...

77
CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Formula for Success: High Performing Education + High Performing Facilities + Community Partnerships = HIGH PERFORMING STUDENTS Schools as Teaching Tools HIGH PERFORMANCE FACILITY ASSESSMENT

Upload: others

Post on 16-Oct-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

Formula for Success:

High Performing Education+

High Performing Facilities+

Community Partnerships=

HIGH PERFORMING STUDENTS

Schools as Teaching Tools

HIG

H P

ER

FOR

MA

NC

E F

AC

ILIT

Y A

SS

ES

SM

EN

T

Page 2: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

INTRODUCTION: 2012 SUSTAINABLE FACILITIES MASTER PLAN The following is the High Performance Facilities Assessment document for the above mentioned school. The document has been prepared in conjunction with the District’s 2012 Sustainable Facilities Master Plan. This document provides detailed school site assessments documenting the status of existing conditions/systems and highlighting the transformation opportunities within the format of the Collaborative for High Performance Schools (CHPS) Best Practices, consistent with the District’s Board Policy Initiatives.

The Facilities Assessment document has been organized in the Sustainable Categories of: Leadership, Education & Innovation Sustainable Sites (All associated disciplines) Water Efficiency (Plumbing systems) Energy & Atmosphere (Mechanical systems) Climate Materials & Resources (Architectural systems) Indoor Air Quality (Electrical systems) Within each sustainable category the designated areas, systems, components, etc. have been grouped by similar scopes of work. The summaries of these groupings have been used to categorize project types which are identified in the final cost summary for this school.

The assessment template provides a matrix documenting the:

1. The Date Last Reviewed is included to allow the District and/or Consultant Team to continually review and maintain this as a “living document” as facilities improvements and/or needs come up through the life of the facility. It is expected that this document be used as a productive tool for planning & design, and maintenance & operation tasks.

2. The Repair / Replace Level records the level of repair or replacement required using a scale of 0-4. Level 4 – New Replacement (Assumes 100% replacement) Level 3 - Major Repair (Assumes 50-75% repair) Level 2 – Minor Repair (Assumes 25-50% repair) Level 1 – Patch and Repair (Assumes 0-25% repair) Level 0 – No observed need to replace, repair or patch

3. Category for site and building components are coded as: C- Code / Life Safety / Access M – Maintenance / Operations HP – High Performance / Modernization / Transformation

4. The Relative Urgency of the need to replace, repair or patch each site or building component is rated. 3 – Critical 2 – Urgent, not critical 1 – Moderate, recommended 0 – No observed need

The Project Cost Summary concludes the assessment with an estimated cost of projects within each of the Collaborative for High Performing Schools (CHPS) Best Practices categories. In addition each project will have a classification of costs based upon the categories of Code / Life Safety / Access, Maintenance & Operations and High Performance / Modernization / Transformation.

Page 3: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Page 4Page 5Page 6

Page 7Page 8

Page 20Page 21

Page 30Page 32

Page 37

Page 38Page 39

Page 55Page 56

Page 69Page 70

Page 72

Page 73APPENDIX

Crocker/Riverside Elementary School High Performance Facility Assessment

TABLE OF CONTENTS High Performance Facility Assessment based on Green and Grid Neutral Model School Policy Initiative

per Board Policy BP 3511 and Resolution #2583.

ENERGY & ATMOSPHERE

SUSTAINABLE SITES CHPS Summary

COST SUMMARY

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

INDOOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

LEADERSHIP, EDUCATION & INNOVATION

WATER EFFICIENCY

MATERIALS & RESOURCES

PROJECT INFORMATION School Site / Building Summary Documentation Available & DSA Closeout Status

CHPS SUMMARY

CHPS SUMMARY: PAGE X DETAIL ASSESSMENT

CHPS SUMMARY DETAIL ASSESSMENT- PLUMBING SYSTEMS

CHPS SUMMARY

STRATEGIC PLAN OVERLAY

CHPS SUMMARY DETAIL ASSESSMENT- ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS

DETAIL ASSESSMENT- MECHANICAL SYSTEMS

CHPS SUMMARY

CHPS SUMMARY DETAIL ASSESSMENT- ARCHITECTURAL

CLIMATE

Page 4: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

The campus buildings are in good condition. Upgrading the multipurpose building offers an opportunity to strengthen the connection to the community. Identifying the building at the street with new signage, updating the lobby/restrooms, renovating the main room, and upgrading the stage are positive improvements.

The classroom needs include updating the finishes and improving the acoustical separation in buildings 1A & 1B, and improving the data/electrical distribution throughout the campus.

Additional needs and opportunities include paving repairs, storm water drainage improvements, improving campus security, upgrading the restrooms, and improving the efficiency of the landscape irrigation.

Narrative SummaryThe main campus was built in 1939. During the 2004 and 2005 modernization, renovations and upgrades were made in the following areas: interior, exterior, plumbing, HVAC, portable buildings, and miscellaneous upgrades.

The school entrance along Riverside Blvd serves autos, buses, students and visitors. Improvements including new directional/identification signs, additional paving between the curb/sidewalk, an accessible drop-off aisle, and additional parking can transform this area.

There are opportunities to replace little-used, turf throughout the campus with low water use plantings, and create additional outdoor learning area. Site transformations include expanding the school garden area and developing the unused areas in the northwest portion of the site.

Campus Entry

Rive

rside

Blv

d

Crocker – Riverside Elementary School

Crocker–Riverside Elementary School

SACRAMENTO CITYUNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

Sustainable Facilities Master Plan

June 2012

School Mission StatementWe are committed in all our activities to provide a quality education for all our children. Our goal is to guide children to become fully participating citizens by giving them a strong academic education in a nurturing environment that recognizes diversity, promotes healthy choices and embraces community involvement.

‘Student Centered Education’

Site Plan of Campus

School Location Legend

CRES-I

Page 5: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Sustainable Sites Outdoor ActivityPoor surface condition poses safety risk.

Sustainable Sites Campus CoreDoes not promote education and informal gathering opportunities.

Sustainable Sites School Entry/Drop Off Groundcover planting could enhance entry and waiting area.

SACRAMENTO CITYUNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

Sustainable Facilities Master Plan

June 2012

Utility Efficiency Exterior Rusted exterior gas piping.

Energy & AtmosphereEnergy management system needs evaluation.

Materials & Resources ExteriorPonding requires slope adjustment.

Indoor Environmental Quality Insufficient drops at computer stations.

Crocker–Riverside Elementary School

Water Efficiency InteriorVacuum breaker missing and not accessibility compliant.

Materials & Resources InteriorFlooring replacement needed.

CRES-II

High Performance Transformation

Encourage innovation in high performance school design creating safe, motivating and sustainable learning environments that reduce dependence on non-sustainable resources.

Create safe, barrier free outdoor learning environments incorporating efficient and effective storm water management, landscaping, lighting and surfaces.

Improve the efficiency of fixtures, appliances and irrigation systems to reduce domestic water usage.

Optimize energy efficiency and performance to minimize environmental impacts and reduce operating costs associated with fossil fuels.

Improve the learning environment and extend the life-cycle of facilities while encouraging the use of efficient sustainable materials and reducing waste.

Enhance air quality, thermal comfort, natural light, acoustic performance and physical environments while reducing pollutants. Provide a safe, healthy, functional environment to help motivate students and encourage attendance.

Page 6: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Crocker–Riverside Elementary School

CRES-III

The following is a site organizational concept of H.W. Harkness Elementary School to implement the Strategic Plan 2010-2014: Putting Children First and the Common Core Standards.

SAFE & WELCOMING SCHOOLDedicated Drop-Off

Visitor/Staff Parking

Garden/Quad/Outdoor Learning

CAREER & COLLEGE READYCore Academic

Kindergarten (K)Elementary; Lower 1-3, Upper 4-6

Learning Labs Expansion (3,600sf)Project Labs (PL)Art/Science

Support Support Spaces – distributed

FAMILY & COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENTTechnology Center (TC) Transformation (2,203sf)

Media Center & Computer LabParent Center & Conference RoomTeacher Planning CenterNote: Transformation of (E) MP

Multi-Purpose (MP) Expansion (7,536sf)Dining / Gym / Assembly / Stage Restrooms / Kitchen / Storage

ORGANIZATIONAL TRANSFORMATIONClassroom, Media Center Expansion / Administration Conversion (12,440sf)

Portable to Permanent and CR Expansion to meet optimized Campus Capacity Goals of 552-672 students. 0 Classrooms & Support Space

‘Student Centered Education’

Site Plan- Concept Study

PL

TC

MP

SACRAMENTO CITYUNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

Sustainable Facilities Master Plan

June 2012

MPMP

TC

PLFuture Quad

Adm

inMed

iaC

ente

r

Parking

Future 2 storyClassroom Expansion

Page 7: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

CRES-IV

Crocker–Riverside Elementary School

SACRAMENTO CITYUNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

Sustainable Facilities Master Plan

June 2012

School Site Facilities Needs The Following List was provided by the School’s Principal as generated from School Site Council and Community Meetings:

CHPS SummaryCollaborative for High Performance Schools

Supports the idea that “a well-designed facility can truly enhance performance and make education more enjoyable and rewarding…and a productive learning experience.”

In accordance with the Green and Grid Neutral Model Schools Policy Initiative-BP 3511and Resolution No. 2583; Adopting the Collaborative for High Performing Schools (CHPS) Criteria, the following summary characterizes how the Schools align with the Best Practices Criteria.

SUMMARY by Eligible ActualCHPS Categories Points Points

Leadership, Education & Innovation 13 1

Sustainable Sites 14 3 Water Efficiency 9 0 Energy & Atmosphere 29 1 Climate 10 0 Materials & Resources 18 2 Indoor Environmental

Quality 23/25 3

TOTAL 116 10

Under CHPS CHPS HighPerforming Minimum Performing

0 10 25 116 PointsCRES

List Pending Input from School---

Indoor Environmental Quality

- Electrical Systems- Lighting Systems- Technology Systems- Low Voltage Systems

Energy & Atmosphere- Central Plant- HVAC Systems- Specialty Systems- Alternative Energy Systems

Sustainable Sites- School Entry & Drop-off

- Parking & Drives- Service Access- Outdoor Activity- Campus Core - Utilities & Infrastructure

Water Efficiency- Site Utilities &Infrastructure

- Plumbing Systems- Specialty Systems- Fire Protection Systems

Campus Assessment SummaryMaterials & Resources- Signage - Door Hardware- Interior Space- Exterior Finish

Leadership, Education & Innovation

- Career & College Ready- Family & Community Engagement- Organizational Transformation

Assessment TotalCost Summary reflects Total Project Cost Estimate, inclusive of Construction Cost and Soft Cost

Cod

e, L

ife S

afet

y &

Acc

ess

Mai

nten

ance

&

Ope

ratio

ns

High

Per

form

ance

Tr

ansf

orm

atio

n

Project Cost Summary Matrix

Schools as Teaching Tools

$291,330

$13,130

$0

$63,180

$11,310

$0

$378,950

$509,470

$2,730

$234,390

$1,282,060

$140,400

$0

$2,169,050

$826,410

$100,360

$141,570

$1,156,480

$577,460

$12,684,360

$15,486,640

$1,627,210

$116,220

$375,960

$2,501,720

$729,170

$12,684,360

$18,034,640

Sust

aina

ble

Cat

egor

y To

tal

Page 8: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

School NameAddressGrade Levels K-6Site Acreage 3.68*Total Building Area- Permanent Structures

29,387 GSF*

# Classrooms 10

Affiliation Name PhoneDistrict Representative SCUSD Kim Teague 919-643-2464School Principal SCUSD Carl Westphal 916-264-4183Plant ManagerArchitect NTD

ArchitectureDaryl Moore 530-888-0999

Landscape Architect MIG Berkeley Larry Wight 510-845-7549Landscape Architect MIG Davis Chris Fullmer (530) 753-960Mechanical Engineer Capital

EngineeringBill Vogt 916-851-3500

Electrical Engineer The Engineering Enterprise

Danny McKevitt 530-886-8556

Plumbing Engineer Capital Engineering

Mike Rodgers 916-851-3500

Cost Estimator Cumming Corporation

Brooks Rehkopf 916-779-7149

Provider Account #

[email protected]

ElectricGas

1939 OC / 2004, 2005 Mod**Original Construction

[email protected]

UTILITY PROVIDERS

Water

[email protected]

** 2010-11 School Accountability Report Card * 2006 SCUSD Facilities Master Plan

[email protected]

CONTACTS

PhoneInternet / Cable

SCHOOL ASSESSMENT LOGDATE / DIVISION / DISCIPLINE TASK LAST REVIEWED04/12 NTD ARCHITECTURE 2012 SUSTAINABLE FACILITIES MASTER PLAN

Sewer

Contact Name

[email protected]@migcom.com

[email protected]

Crocker/Riverside Elementary School High Performance Facility Assessment

# Classrooms 10**

Student Population 597**

Total Building Area- Modular & Portable Structures

12,480 GSF

SCHOOL SITE SUMMARYCrocker Riverside Elementary School2970 Riverside Blvd., Sacramento, CA 95818

E-Mail

[email protected]

[email protected]

Project Information: Page 4 of 73

Page 9: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

DSA APP#02-110899

02-106146

02-10586802-105251

Construction of Relocatable C.R. Building (2-Story) & Relocatable Library Building

Construction of 1-Concrete Accessible Ramps and Signage

DSA CLOSEOUT STATUSPROJECT DESCRIPTION

Alteration to CR/office bldg., Auditorium bldg., MP bldg., 2 CR bldg., (HVAC upgrade)

DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE

Close of File w/o Certification -

REPORTS PREPARED BY: DATE:

OPEN, 90-Day Status UnknownCertification & Close of File

DRAWING SETS

Certification & Close of File

SPECIFICATIONS

STATUS

Alteration to 3 - C.R. Bldg/s , 1 - M.P. Bldg

Project Information: Page 5 of 73

Page 10: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Eligible Points Actual Points

Sustainable Sites Total 14 3

Water Efficiency Total 9 0

Energy & Atmosphere Total 29 1

Climate Total 10 0

Materials & Resources Total 18 2

Indoor Environmental Quality Total 25 3

Leadership, Education & Innovation Total 13 1

Totals per School 118 10Eligible Points Actual Points

LEADERSHIP, EDUCATION & INNOVATION

CLIMATE

INDOOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

MATERIALS & RESOURCES

Crocker/Riverside Elementary School High Performance Facility Assessment

CHPS SUMMARY

SUSTAINABLE SITES

ENERGY & ATMOSPHERE

WATER EFFICIENCY

CHPS Summary: Page 6 of 73

Page 11: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Elig

ible

Po

ints

Act

ual

Po

ints

Eligible Points: P- Prerequisite (Required), 1+ Per CHPS .Actual Points: Per Assessment . . Notes:

SS1.0 Code Compliance P P Intent: To select sites that are safe and healthy environments.SS1.1 Environmentally

Sensitive Land1 1 Intent : Avoid development on environmentally sensitive sites to reduce

impact of the building footprint. SS1.2 Central Location 1 1 Intent: To make the school more accessible to its occupants, and to

promote smart growth.SS1.3 Joint-Use of Facilities 1 0 Intent: Allow for more community and neighborhood integration within the

school facility.SS1.4 Joint-Use of Parks 1 1 Intent: Allow for more community and neighborhood integration within the

school grounds.SS1.5 Reduced Footprint 1 0 Intent: Reduce the extent of land used for development.

SS2.1 Public Transportation 1 0 Intent: Encourage the use of public transportation.SS2.2 Human Powered

Transportation1 0 Intent : Encourage alternative transportation methods to and from school

that increase physical activity, improve health, and reduce dependence on fossil fuels.

SS2.3 Parking Minimization 1 0 Intent : Discourage the use of automobiles for transportation to and from school.

SS3.0 Construction Site Runoff Control

P P Intent: Reduce erosion and negative impacts on water and air quality during construction.

SS3.1 Limit Stormwater Runoff

1 0 Intent : Manage stormwater runoff to limit disruption and pollution of natural waterways.

SS3.2 Treat Stormwater Runoff

1 0 Intent : Control and filter storm water runoff to limit disruption and pollution of natural waterways.

SS4.1 Reduce Heat Islands - Landscaping

1 0 Intent: Optimize landscape design to reduce the heat island effect.

SS4.2 Reduce Heat Islands - Cool Roofs

1 0 Intent : Employ cool or green roofs to reduce the heat island effect.

SS4.3 School Garden 1 0 Intent : To encourage schools to incorporate teaching gardens.

SS5.1 Light Pollution Reduction

1 0 Intent: Reduce development impacts on the nocturnal environment.

Eligible Points 14 3 Actual Points

5. Outdoor Lighting

4. Outdoor Surfaces & Spaces

Crocker/Riverside Elementary School High Performance Facility Assessment

CHPS SUMMARY: SUSTAINABLE SITES

Credit # / Title

1. Site Selection

2. Transportation

CHPS- Sustainable Sites: Summary

3. Stormwater Management

CHPS Summary: Sustainable Sites: Page 7 of 73

Page 12: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Repair / Replace Level: 4-New Replacement,3-Major Repair, 2-Minor Repair, 1-Patch & Repair,0-No observed need to replace, repair or patchCategory: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need to replace repair or patch

.1 P.O.T./Sidewalks 02/12 2 C 3 Path of travel is not clearly identified. Additional paving required. See 2009 accessibility survey

.2 Drive/Drop Off (Parent) 02/12 2 C 3 Curb side drop-off is functional. Accessible drop off space and paving required.

.3 Drive/Drop Off (Bus) 02/12 2 C 3 Bus drop-off at opposite end of block

.4 Signage- Identification 02/12 3 C 3 Limited signage separating buses and student auto passenger drop off

.5 Signage- Monument 02/12 1 M 1 Hand crafted sign similar to several elementary school sites

.6 Fence 02/12 4 HP 2 No security fencing at entrance

.7 Gates 02/12 4 HP 2 No security gates at entrance

.8 Site Lighting: Type/Condition

02/12 NA

.9 Site Lighting: Efficiency/ Cut-off

02/12 NA

Crocker/Riverside Elementary School High Performance Facility Assessment

SUSTAINABLE SITES

Scope

1. School Entry/Drop Off

Sustainable Sites: Page 8 of 73

Page 13: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Repair / Replace Level: 4-New Replacement,3-Major Repair, 2-Minor Repair, 1-Patch & Repair,0-No observed need to replace, repair or patchCategory: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need to replace repair or patch Scope

.10 Building Mtd Lighting: Type/Condition

02/12 1 M 1 MH wall pack, fair condition

.11 Building Mtd Lighting: Efficiency/ Cut-off

02/12 4 HP 1 Does not meet CHPS requirements, not full cut-off.

.12 Lighting Controls Condition

02/12 1 M 1 Time clock

.13 Lighting Controls Efficiency

02/12 4 HP 1 Not title 24 compliant multi-level control

.14 Planting - Trees Condition

02/12 1 M 1 Exposed roots of one tree requires mulch cover.

.15 Planting - Trees Adequacy

02/12 4 HP 1 Entry could be enhanced with 2 or 3 additional small trees.

Sustainable Sites: Page 9 of 73

Page 14: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Repair / Replace Level: 4-New Replacement,3-Major Repair, 2-Minor Repair, 1-Patch & Repair,0-No observed need to replace, repair or patchCategory: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need to replace repair or patch Scope

.16 Planting-Shrub/Grndcvr Condition

02/12 2 M 2 Shrubs over-pruned, many areas of turf worn to bare dirt.

.17 Planting-Shrub/Grndcvr Adequacy

02/12 2 C 1 Areas of parking strip used for drop off should be converted to accessible surfacing. Replace turf to meet WELO/AB 1881. Shrub/groundcover plantings could enhance entry & potential waiting area. (HP Opportunity)

.18 Irrigation Condition 02/12 0 M 0

.19 Irrigation Efficiency 02/12 4 HP 1 Replace with high efficiency heads

.20 Storm Water Drainage 02/12 0 M 0

.21 Site Furnishings 02/12 4 hp 1 Provide benches for waiting.

.22 Other

.1 P.O.T./Sidewalks 02/12 3 C 3 Non compliant accessible parking and path of travel See 2009 accessibility report. (insert photo of access parking)

.2 Drive 02/12 2 M 2 Moderate asphalt paving cracking.

.3 Staff Parking - Condition 02/12 2 M 2 Moderate asphalt paving cracking.

.4 Staff Parking - Adequacy 02/12 2 M 2 Inadequate number of parking spaces.

2. Parking & Drives

Sustainable Sites: Page 10 of 73

Page 15: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Repair / Replace Level: 4-New Replacement,3-Major Repair, 2-Minor Repair, 1-Patch & Repair,0-No observed need to replace, repair or patchCategory: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need to replace repair or patch Scope

.5 Student Parking - Condition

02/12 Moderate asphalt paving cracking.

.6 Student Parking - Adequacy

02/12 2 HP 2 Inadequate number of parking spaces.

.7 Signage- Identification 02/12 A

.8 Fence 02/12 HP No security fencing at parking to campus core. ( provide photo)

.9 Gates 02/12 HP No security gates at parking to campus core. ( provide photo)

.10 Site Lighting: Type/Condition

02/12 NA

.11 Site Lighting: Efficiency/ Cut-off

02/12 NA

.12 Building Mtd Lighting: Type/Condition

02/12 1 M 1 Not cut-off. CFL and MH wall packs, exposed conduit. Fixture type varies, fair condition, light levels not observed.

.13 Building Mtd Lighting: Efficiency/ Cut-off

02/12 4 HP 1 Does not meet CHPS requirements, not full cut-off.

.14 Lighting Controls Condition

02/12 2 M 1 Primarily photocells, some time clocks, some line voltage switch with no automatic control. Many lights observed were turned on during daylight hours.

.15 Lighting Controls Efficiency

02/12 4 HP 1 Not title 24 compliant multi-level control

.16 Planting-Trees for Shade Condition

02/12 0 M 0

.17 Planting - Trees for Shade Adequacy

02/12 0 HP 0

Sustainable Sites: Page 11 of 73

Page 16: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Repair / Replace Level: 4-New Replacement,3-Major Repair, 2-Minor Repair, 1-Patch & Repair,0-No observed need to replace, repair or patchCategory: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need to replace repair or patch Scope

.18 Planting-Shrub/Grndcvr Condition

02/12 0 M 0 L

.19 Planting-Shrub/Grndcvr Adequacy

02/12 4 HP 1 Replace turf with low water use plantings.

.20 Irrigation Condition 02/12 0 M 0

.21 Irrigation Efficiency 02/12 4 HP 1 Replace with water efficient heads.

.22 Storm Water Drainage 02/12 0 M 0

.23 Other 02/12

.1 Drive/Vehicle Access 02/12 2 M 1 Moderate asphalt paving cracking.

.2 Trash/Recycle Area 02/12 4 HP 1 No trash enclosure. Current pick up in parking lot.(insert picture)

.3 Service Yard 02/12 4 HP 1 No yard.

.4 Signage- Identification 02/12 4 HP 2 No identification of service area. Limited fire lane markings

.5 Fence 02/12 4 HP 2 No security fencing at parking to campus core. ( provide photo)

.6 Gates 02/12 4 HP 2 No security gates at parking to campus core. ( insert photo)

.7 Site Lighting: Type/Condition

02/12 NA

.8 Site Lighting: Efficiency/ Cut-off

02/12 NA

.9 Building Mtd Lighting: Type/Condition

02/12 NA

.10 Building Mtd Lighting: Efficiency/ Cut-off

02/12 NA

.11 Lighting Controls Condition

02/12 NA

.12 Lighting Controls Efficiency

02/12 NA

.13 Planting-Trees for Shade Condition

02/12 0 M 0 Same as Parking & Drives

.14 Planting - Trees for Shade Adequacy

02/12 0 HP 0 Same as Parking & Drives

.15 Planting-Shrub/Grndcvr Condition

02/12 0 M 0 Same as Parking & Drives

.16 Planting-Shrub/Grndcvr Adequacy

02/12 4 HP 1 Same as Parking & Drives

.17 Irrigation Condition 02/12 0 M 0 Same as Parking & Drives

.18 Irrigation Efficiency 02/12 4 HP 1 Same as Parking & Drives

.19 Storm Water Drainage 02/12 0 M 0 Same as Parking & Drives

.20 Site Furnishings 02/12 NA

.21 Other

.1 P.O.T./Walks 02/12 2 M 1 Moderate asphalt paving cracking.

.2 Vehicle Access 02/12 2 M 1 Moderate asphalt paving cracking.

3. Service Access (Fire/Maintenance/Trash Pick Up)

4. Outdoor Activity

Sustainable Sites: Page 12 of 73

Page 17: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Repair / Replace Level: 4-New Replacement,3-Major Repair, 2-Minor Repair, 1-Patch & Repair,0-No observed need to replace, repair or patchCategory: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need to replace repair or patch Scope

.3 Paved School Yard / Courts

02/12 2 M 2 Paved play yard needs crack repair and new striping

.4 Pool 02/12 - - -

.5 Signage- Identification 02/12 0 M 0

.6 Fence 02/12 1 M 1

.7 Gates 02/12 1 M 1

.8 Site Lighting: Type/Condition

02/12 NA

.9 Site Lighting: Efficiency/ Cut-off

02/12 NA

.10 Building Mtd Lighting: Type/Condition

02/12 NA

.11 Building Mtd Lighting: Efficiency/ Cut-off

02/12 NA

.12 Lighting Controls Condition

02/12 NA

.13 Lighting Controls Efficiency

02/12 NA

.14 Play Equipment-School-age

02/12 2 C 2 Slope up to top of safety surface exceeds ADA requirements.

Sustainable Sites: Page 13 of 73

Page 18: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Repair / Replace Level: 4-New Replacement,3-Major Repair, 2-Minor Repair, 1-Patch & Repair,0-No observed need to replace, repair or patchCategory: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need to replace repair or patch Scope

.15 Play Equipment-Kinder 02/12 3 C 2 Overhead bars too high & not recommended for age group. Drop-off at ADA ramp entry not compliant.

.16 Sports / Fitness Equipments

02/12 0 M 0

.17 Tennis Courts 02/12 NA

.18 Football Field 02/12 NA

.19 Sports Field 3 M 1 Bare areas; lumpy turf could cause minor ankle injury.

.20 Other Turf Areas 02/12 1 M 1 Bare areas.

Sustainable Sites: Page 14 of 73

Page 19: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Repair / Replace Level: 4-New Replacement,3-Major Repair, 2-Minor Repair, 1-Patch & Repair,0-No observed need to replace, repair or patchCategory: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need to replace repair or patch Scope

.21 Outdoor Gathering / Seating Areas

02/12 0 HP 0 Library Plaza provides community asset.

.22 Outdoor Learning Area 02/12 2 HP 1 This awkwardly graded and poorly developed area could be upgraded for outdoor classroom or expanded school garden.

.23 Planting-Trees for Shade Condition

02/12 0 M 0

.24 Planting - Trees for Shade Adequacy

02/12 0 HP 0 Several recently planted new trees.

.25 Planting-Shrub/Grndcvr Condition

02/12 NA

.26 Planting-Shrub/Grndcvr Adequacy

02/12 1 HP 1 Minor areas of turf could be replaced with plantings to reduce wear use and create outdoor learning areas.

.27 Irrigation - Fields Condition

02/12 0 M 0

.28 Irrigations - Fields Efficiency

02/12 4 C 1 Upgrade irrigation heads to meet WELO AB 1881 requirements.

.29 Irrigation - Other 02/12 NA

Sustainable Sites: Page 15 of 73

Page 20: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Repair / Replace Level: 4-New Replacement,3-Major Repair, 2-Minor Repair, 1-Patch & Repair,0-No observed need to replace, repair or patchCategory: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need to replace repair or patch Scope

.30 Storm Water Drainage 02/12 2 M 2 Replace grates to meet ADA requirements. Replace one undersized drain structure that causes flooding.

.31 Site Furnishings 02/12 1 HP 1 Could use some benches at perimeter.

.32 School Garden 02/12 0 HP 0

.33 Other

.1 P.O.T./Walks 02/12 3 C 2 Path of travel is not clearly identified and does not meet required slopes. See 2009 accessibility survey

.2 Vehicle Access - Fire/Emergency

02/12 2 M 1 Moderate asphalt paving cracking.

.3 Vehicle Access - Maintenance

02/12 2 M 1 Moderate asphalt paving cracking.

.4 Signage- Identification 02/12 3 C 3 The path of travel is not clearly identified. See 2009 accessibility survey

.5 Fence 02/12 1 M 1 Perimeter fencing. No security fencing at east end of school.

.6 Gates 02/12 1 M 1 Limited gates in perimeter fencing.

.7 Site Lighting: Type/Condition

02/12 NA

.8 Site Lighting: Efficiency/ Cut-off

02/12 NA

5. Campus Core

Sustainable Sites: Page 16 of 73

Page 21: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Repair / Replace Level: 4-New Replacement,3-Major Repair, 2-Minor Repair, 1-Patch & Repair,0-No observed need to replace, repair or patchCategory: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need to replace repair or patch Scope

.9 Building Mtd Lighting: Type/Condition

02/12 1 M 1 Not cut-off. CFL and MH wall packs, exposed conduit. Fixture type varies, fair condition, light levels not observed.

.10 Building Mtd Lighting: Efficiency/ Cut-off

02/12 4 HP 1 Does not meet CHPS requirements, not full cut-off.

.11 Lighting Controls Condition

02/12 2 M 1 Primarily photocells, some time clocks, some line voltage switch with no automatic control. Many lights observed were turned on during daylight hours.

.12 Lighting Controls Efficiency

02/12 4 HP 1 Not title 24 compliant multi-level control

.13 Outdoor Gathering Quad 02/12 2 HP 1 This paved area could be enhanced with additional trees and benches.

Sustainable Sites: Page 17 of 73

Page 22: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Repair / Replace Level: 4-New Replacement,3-Major Repair, 2-Minor Repair, 1-Patch & Repair,0-No observed need to replace, repair or patchCategory: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need to replace repair or patch Scope

.14 Outdoor Learning Area 02/12 2 HP 1 There are opportunities to replace little-used, high-ware-use turf with outdoor classrooms.

.15 Trees for Building & Courtyard Shading - Condition

02/12 0 HP 0

.16 Trees for Building & Courtyard Shading - Adequacy

02/12 2 HP 1 Add 3-5 trees to shade campus core.

.17 Planting-Shrub/Grndcvr Condition

02/12 2 M 1

.18 Planting-Shrub/Grndcvr Adequacy

02/12 2 HP 1 Shrub / groundcover plantings could enhance campus core, help create more usable learning environment, and reduce water use.

.19 Irrigation Condition 02/12 1 M 1 Evidence of some overspray.

.20 Irrigation Efficiency 02/12 2 HP 1 School could benefit from high efficiency system.

.21 Storm Water Drainage 02/12 4 M 4 Lack of drainage structure has caused building damage

.22 Site Furnishings 02/12 0 M 0

.23 Other

.1 Fire Service / Hydrants 02/12 0 C 0

.2 Irrigation POC (meter & BFU)

02/12 0 C 0

6. Utilities / Infrastructure

Sustainable Sites: Page 18 of 73

Page 23: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Repair / Replace Level: 4-New Replacement,3-Major Repair, 2-Minor Repair, 1-Patch & Repair,0-No observed need to replace, repair or patchCategory: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need to replace repair or patch Scope

.3 Irrigation Controls 02/12 3 HP 1 Add weather sensing / moisture sensing equipment. Garden has its own controller for drip system, monitored by Garden Committee.

.4 Other

Sustainable Sites: Page 19 of 73

Page 24: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Elig

ible

Po

ints

Act

ual

Po

ints

Eligible Points: P- Prerequisite (Required), 1+ Per CHPS .Actual Points: Per Assessment . . Notes:

WE1.0 Create Water Use Budget

P 0 Intent: To prevent excessive water use for irrigation.

WE1.1 Reduce Potable Water for Use for Non-Recreational Landscaping Area

1-2 0 Intent : Reduce or eliminate potable water use for landscape irrigation.

WE1.2 Reduce Potable Water for Recreational Area Landscaping

1 0 Intent: Reduce or eliminate potable water use for irrigating recreational areas.

WE1.3 Irrigation System Testing and Training

1 0 Intent: Verify that the sites irrigation systems and controls are operating as intended and that effective training has been provided.

WE2.1 Reduce Sewage Conveyance from Toilets and Urinals

2 0 Intent: Reduce wastewater generated and/or the amount of potable water used for sewage conveyance.

WE2.2 Reduce Indoor Potable Water Use

1-2 0 Intent : Reduce the use of indoor potable water.

WE3.1 Water Management System

1 0 Intent: Provide ongoing accountability and optimization of the building and site water performance over time.

Eligible Points 9 0 Actual Points

CHPS- Sustainable Sites: Summary

3. Water Efficiency

2. Indoor Systems

1. Outdoor Systems

Crocker/Riverside Elementary School High Performance Facility Assessment

CHPS SUMMARY: WATER EFFICIENCY

Credit # / Title

CHPS Summary: Water Efficiency: Page 20 of 73

Page 25: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Repair / Replace Level: 4-New Replacement,3-Major Repair, 2-Minor Repair, 1-Patch & Repair,0-No observed need to replace, repair or patchCategory: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need to replace repair or patch

1..1 Domestic Water Service:

BFP02/12 0 C 0 N/A

.2 Domestic Water Service: Other

- - - - N/A

.3 Fire Protection: BFP 02/12 0 C 0 N/A

.4 Fire Protection: FDC 02/12 0 C 0 N/A

.5 Fire Protection: PIV 02/12 0 C 0 N/A

.6 Fire Protection: Other - - - - N/A

.7 Sanitary Sewer: Condition

02/12 0 M 0 N/A

.8 Sanitary Sewer: Other - - - - N/A

.9 Drinking Fountain: Condition

02/12 0 M 0 N/A

.10 Drinking Fountain: Efficiency

02/12 0 HP 0 N/A

.11 Other - - - - N/A

1. Plumbing Systems.1 Sink Condition 02/12 0 M 0 Fixtures are in good condition.2 Sink Efficiency 02/12 4 HP 1 Install low flow aerators.3 Lavatories Condition 02/12 NA.4 Lavatories Efficiency 02/12 NA.5 Urinals Condition 02/12 NA.6 Urinals Efficiency 02/12 NA.7 Water Closets Condition 02/12 NA

.8 Water Closets Efficiency 02/12 NA

.9 Showers Condition 02/12 NA

.10 Showers Efficiency 02/12 NA

.11 Drinking Fountain Condition

02/12 NA

.12 Drinking Fountain Efficiency

02/12 NA

.13 Floor Sinks 02/12 NA

.14 Floor Drains 02/12 NA

Crocker/Riverside Elementary School High Performance Facility Assessment

WATER EFFICIENCY

ScopeCampus Systems

Building - 1A Classroom / Administration

Site Utilities & Infrastructure

Water Efficiency: Page 21 of 73

Page 26: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Repair / Replace Level: 4-New Replacement,3-Major Repair, 2-Minor Repair, 1-Patch & Repair,0-No observed need to replace, repair or patchCategory: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need to replace repair or patch Scope

.15 Gas Distribution 02/12 2 C 2 Rusted exterior gas piping, recommend pipe be cleaned, repainted, and re-supported.

.16 Roof Drain / Overflow 02/12 1 M 1 Roof drain/overflow obstructed with leaves, recommend cleaning

.17 Condensate Drain 02/12 0 M 0 Condensate drains are in good condition

.18 Other

2. Specialty Systems.1 Acid Neutralization /

Separation02/12 NA

.2 Clay Separation 02/12 NA

.3 Other 02/12 NA

3..1 Fire Systems 02/12 NA.2 Other 02/12 NA

1. Plumbing Systems.1 Sink Condition 02/12 0 M 0 Fixtures are in good condition.2 Sink Efficiency 02/12 4 HP 1 Install low flow aerators.3 Lavatories Condition 02/12 NA.4 Lavatories Efficiency 02/12 NA.5 Urinals Condition 02/12 NA.6 Urinals Efficiency 02/12 NA.7 Water Closets Condition 02/12 NA

.8 Water Closets Efficiency 02/12 NA

.9 Showers Condition 02/12 NA

.10 Showers Efficiency 02/12 NA

Building - 1B Classroom

Fire Protection Systems

Water Efficiency: Page 22 of 73

Page 27: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Repair / Replace Level: 4-New Replacement,3-Major Repair, 2-Minor Repair, 1-Patch & Repair,0-No observed need to replace, repair or patchCategory: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need to replace repair or patch Scope

.11 Drinking Fountain Condition

02/12 0 M 0 Fixtures are in good condition

.12 Drinking Fountain Efficiency

02/12 NA

.13 Floor Sinks 02/12 NA

.14 Floor Drains 02/12 NA

.15 Gas Distribution 02/12 2 C 2 Rusted exterior gas piping, recommend piping be cleaned, repainted, and re-supported.

.16 Roof Drain / Overflow 02/12 1 M 1 Roof drain/overflow obstructed with leaves, recommend cleaning

.17 Condensate Drain 02/12 0 M 0 Condensate drains are in good condition

.18 Other

2. Specialty Systems.1 Acid Neutralization /

Separation02/12 NA

.2 Clay Separation 02/12 NA

.3 Other 02/12 NA

3..1 Fire Systems 02/12 NA.2 Other 02/12 NA

1. Plumbing Systems.1 Sink Condition 02/12 0 M 0 Fixtures are in good condition.2 Sink Efficiency 02/12 4 HP 1 Install low flow aerators.3 Lavatories Condition 02/12 NA.4 Lavatories Efficiency 02/12 NA.5 Urinals Condition 02/12 NA.6 Urinals Efficiency 02/12 NA.7 Water Closets Condition 02/12 NA

.8 Water Closets Efficiency 02/12 NA

Building - 2 Multipurpose

Fire Protection Systems

Water Efficiency: Page 23 of 73

Page 28: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Repair / Replace Level: 4-New Replacement,3-Major Repair, 2-Minor Repair, 1-Patch & Repair,0-No observed need to replace, repair or patchCategory: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need to replace repair or patch Scope

.9 Showers Condition 02/12 NA

.10 Showers Efficiency 02/12 HP NA

.11 Drinking Fountain Condition

02/12 0 M 0 Fixtures are in good condition

.12 Drinking Fountain Efficiency

02/12 NA

.13 Floor Sinks 02/12 NA

.14 Floor Drains 02/12 NA

.15 Gas Distribution 02/12 0 M 0 Gas piping is in good condition

.16 Roof Drain / Overflow 02/12 0 M 0 Roof drain/overflow are in good condition

.17 Condensate Drain 02/12 0 M 0 Condensate drain piping is in good condition

.18 Other 2 C 1 No vacuum breaker on service sink faucet, service sink non ADA compliant

2. Specialty Systems.1 Acid Neutralization /

Separation02/12 NA

.2 Clay Separation 02/12 NA

.3 Other

3..1 Fire Systems 02/12 NA.2 Other 02/12 NA

1. Plumbing Systems.1 Sink Condition 02/12 0 M 0 fixtures are in good condition.2 Sink Efficiency 02/12 4 HP 1 install low flow aerators.3 Lavatories Condition 02/12 NA.4 Lavatories Efficiency 02/12 NA.5 Urinals Condition 02/12 NA

Fire Protection Systems

Building - 3 Cafeteria & Kindergarten

Water Efficiency: Page 24 of 73

Page 29: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Repair / Replace Level: 4-New Replacement,3-Major Repair, 2-Minor Repair, 1-Patch & Repair,0-No observed need to replace, repair or patchCategory: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need to replace repair or patch Scope

.6 Urinals Efficiency 02/12 NA

.7 Water Closets Condition 02/12 NA

.8 Water Closets Efficiency 02/12 NA

.9 Showers Condition 02/12 NA

.10 Showers Efficiency 02/12 NA

.11 Drinking Fountain Condition

02/12 0 M 0 Fixtures are in good condition

.12 Drinking Fountain Efficiency

02/12 NA

.13 Floor Sinks 02/12 NA

.14 Floor Drains 02/12 NA

.15 Gas Distribution 02/12 0 M 0 Gas piping is in good condition

.16 Roof Drain / Overflow 02/12 0 M 0 Roof drain/overflow obstructed with leaves, recommend cleaning

.17 Condensate Drain 02/12 0 M 0 Condensate drain piping is in good condition

.18 Other

2. Specialty Systems.1 Acid Neutralization /

Separation02/12 NA

.2 Clay Separation 02/12 NA

.3 Other 02/12 NA

3..1 Fire Systems 02/12 NA.2 Other 02/12 NA

1. Plumbing Systems.1 Sink Condition 02/12 0 M 0 fixtures are in good condition.2 Sink Efficiency 02/12 4 HP 1 install low flow aerators.3 Lavatories Condition 02/12 NA.4 Lavatories Efficiency 02/12 NA.5 Urinals Condition 02/12 NA.6 Urinals Efficiency 02/12 NA.7 Water Closets Condition 02/12 NA

.8 Water Closets Efficiency 02/12 NA

.9 Showers Condition 02/12 NA

.10 Showers Efficiency 02/12 NA

.11 Drinking Fountain Condition

02/12 NA

.12 Drinking Fountain Efficiency

02/12

Building - Library/Computer

Fire Protection Systems

Water Efficiency: Page 25 of 73

Page 30: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Repair / Replace Level: 4-New Replacement,3-Major Repair, 2-Minor Repair, 1-Patch & Repair,0-No observed need to replace, repair or patchCategory: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need to replace repair or patch Scope

.13 Floor Sinks 02/12 NA

.14 Floor Drains 02/12 NA

.15 Gas Distribution 02/12 0 M 0 rusted exterior gas piping, recommend piping be cleaned, repainted, and re-supported.

.16 Roof Drain / Overflow 02/12 0 M 0 roof drain/overflow obstructed with leaves, recommend cleaning

.17 Condensate Drain 02/12 0 M 0 condensate drain piping is in good condition

.18 Other

2. Specialty Systems.1 Acid Neutralization /

Separation02/12 NA

.2 Clay Separation 02/12 NA

.3 Other 02/12 NA

3..1 Fire Systems 02/12 NA.2 Other 02/12 NA

1. Plumbing Systems.1 Sink Condition 02/12 0 M 0 Fixtures are in good condition.2 Sink Efficiency 02/12 4 HP 1 Install low flow aerators.3 Lavatories Condition 02/12 NA.4 Lavatories Efficiency 02/12 NA.5 Urinals Condition 02/12 NA.6 Urinals Efficiency 02/12 NA.7 Water Closets Condition 02/12 NA

.8 Water Closets Efficiency 02/12 NA

.9 Showers Condition 02/12 NA

.10 Showers Efficiency 02/12 NA

.11 Drinking Fountain Condition

02/12 NA

Fire Protection Systems

Building - Portables 2 Story Classroom

Water Efficiency: Page 26 of 73

Page 31: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Repair / Replace Level: 4-New Replacement,3-Major Repair, 2-Minor Repair, 1-Patch & Repair,0-No observed need to replace, repair or patchCategory: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need to replace repair or patch Scope

.12 Drinking Fountain Efficiency

02/12

.13 Floor Sinks 02/12 NA

.14 Floor Drains 02/12 NA

.15 Gas Distribution 02/12 0 M 0 Rusted exterior gas piping, recommend piping be cleaned, repainted, and re-supported.

.16 Roof Drain / Overflow 02/12 NA

.17 Condensate Drain 02/12 0 M 0 Condensate drain piping is in good condition

.18 Other

2. Specialty Systems.1 Acid Neutralization /

Separation02/12 NA

.2 Clay Separation 02/12 NA

.3 Other NA

3..1 Fire Systems 02/12 NA.2 Other 02/12 NA

1. Plumbing Systems.1 Sink Condition 02/12 NA.2 Sink Efficiency 02/12 NA.3 Lavatories Condition 02/12 0 M 0 Fixtures are in good condition, accessible fixture piping to be

wrapped per 2011 CPC.4 Lavatories Efficiency 02/12 4 HP 1 Install low flow aerators.5 Urinals Condition 02/12 NA.6 Urinals Efficiency 02/12 HP NA.7 Water Closets Condition 02/12 0 M 0 Fixtures are in good condition

.8 Water Closets Efficiency 02/12 4 HP 1 Install low flow fixtures

.9 Showers Condition 02/12 NA

.10 Showers Efficiency 02/12 NA

Building - Staff Restrooms

Fire Protection Systems

Water Efficiency: Page 27 of 73

Page 32: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Repair / Replace Level: 4-New Replacement,3-Major Repair, 2-Minor Repair, 1-Patch & Repair,0-No observed need to replace, repair or patchCategory: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need to replace repair or patch Scope

.11 Drinking Fountain Condition

02/12 NA

.12 Drinking Fountain Efficiency

02/12 NA

.13 Floor Sinks 02/12 NA

.14 Floor Drains 02/12 0 M 0 Fixtures are in good condition

.15 Gas Distribution 02/12 NA

.16 Roof Drain / Overflow 02/12 NA

.17 Condensate Drain 02/12 NA

.18 Other 02/12 NA

2. Specialty Systems.1 Acid Neutralization /

Separation02/12 NA

.2 Clay Separation 02/12 NA

.3 Other 02/12 NA

3..1 Fire Systems 02/12 NA.2 Other 02/12 NA

1. Plumbing Systems.1 Sink Condition 02/12 0 M 0 .2 Sink Efficiency 02/12 0 HP 0 .3 Lavatories Condition 02/12 0 M 0 Fixtures are in good condition, accessible fixture piping to be

wrapped per 2011 CPC.4 Lavatories Efficiency 02/12 4 HP 1 Install low flow aerators.5 Urinals Condition 02/12 NA.6 Urinals Efficiency 02/12 NA.7 Water Closets Condition 02/12 0 M 0 Fixtures are in cracked, recommend replacement

.8 Water Closets Efficiency 02/12 4 HP 1 Install low flow fixtures

.9 Showers Condition 02/12 NA

.10 Showers Efficiency 02/12 NA

Fire Protection Systems

Building - Student Restrooms

Water Efficiency: Page 28 of 73

Page 33: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Repair / Replace Level: 4-New Replacement,3-Major Repair, 2-Minor Repair, 1-Patch & Repair,0-No observed need to replace, repair or patchCategory: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need to replace repair or patch Scope

.11 Drinking Fountain Condition

02/12 NA

.12 Drinking Fountain Efficiency

02/12 NA

.13 Floor Sinks 02/12 NA

.14 Floor Drains 02/12 0 M 0 Fixtures are in good condition

.15 Gas Distribution 02/12 NA

.16 Roof Drain / Overflow 02/12 NA

.17 Condensate Drain 02/12 NA

.18 Other 02/12 NA

2. Specialty Systems.1 Acid Neutralization /

Separation02/12 NA

.2 Clay Separation 02/12 NA

.3 Other 02/12 NA

3..1 Fire Systems 02/12 NA.2 Other 02/12 NA

Fire Protection Systems

Water Efficiency: Page 29 of 73

Page 34: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Elig

ible

Po

ints

Act

ual

Po

ints

Eligible Points: P- Prerequisite (Required), 1+ Per CHPS .Actual Points: Per Assessment . . Notes:

EE1.0 Minimum Energy Performance

P P Intent: Establish a minimum energy efficiency level.

EE1.1 Superior Energy Performance

1-15 0 Intent : Exceed the minimum energy performance beyond the prerequisite.

EE1.2 Energy Conservation Interlocks

1 0 Intent: Conserve energy loss through building openings with the use of interlocks connected to the HVAC system.

EE1.3 Natural Ventilation 3-4 0 Intent: Maximize natural ventilation (without mechanical cooling systems) by relying on outside air movement through classroom buildings.

EE1.4 Energy Management Systems

1-2 1 Intent: Provide ongoing accountability and optimization of the building energy performance over time.

EE2.1 On-site Renewable Energy

1-5 0 Intent : Encourage on-site energy production with renewable sources.

EE3.0 Fundamental Commissioning

P 0 Intent: Verify that the building energy systems are designed, installed, calibrated and perform as intended and that effective training has been provided.

EE3.1 Enhanced Commissioning

1-2 0 Intent : Verify that the buildings energy systems are designed, installed, calibrated to perform as intended.

Eligible Points 29 1 Actual Points

3. Commissioning & Training

CHPS- Sustainable Sites: Summary

2. Alternate Energy Sources

1. Energy Efficiency

Crocker/Riverside Elementary School High Performance Facility Assessment

CHPS SUMMARY: ENERGY & ATMOSPHERE

Credit # / Title

CHPS Summary: Energy and Atmosphere: Page 30 of 73

Page 35: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Repair / Replace Level: 4-New Replacement,3-Major Repair, 2-Minor Repair, 1-Patch & Repair,0-No observed need to replace, repair or patchCategory: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need to replace repair or patch

1. Central Plant.1 Boiler: Condition 02/12 - - - N/A.2 Boiler: Efficiency 02/12 - - - N/A.3 Chiller: Condition 02/12 - - - N/A.4 Chiller: Efficiency 02/12 - - - N/A.5 Other

1. HVAC Systems.1 Equipment: Condition 02/12 0 M 0 The existing HVAC system consists of roof top package AC

units with gas heat which appear to be approximately 8 years old.

.2 Equipment: Efficiency 02/12 4 HP 1 replace equipment with high efficiency units

.3 Ductwork 02/12 1 M 1 Ductwork on roof exhibits some rust, recommend painting of exposed ductwork on roof and cleaning ductwork.

.4 Ventilation 02/12 0 M 0 Systems provide minimum OA, no economizers

.5 EMS Systems: Condition 02/12 0 M 0 M

.6 EMS Systems: Efficiency 02/12 2 M 1 EMS scheduling should be confirmed. Site maintenance staff indicated that HVAC systems are running when occupants do no require the systems to be on.

.7 Other

2. Specialty Systems.1 Dust Collection 02/12 NA.2 Fume Hoods 02/12 NA.3 Other NA

Crocker/Riverside Elementary School High Performance Facility Assessment

ENERGY & ATMOSPHERE

Scope

Site Utilities & Infrastructure

Building - 1A Classrooms/Administration

Energy and Atmosphere: Page 31 of 73

Page 36: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Repair / Replace Level: 4-New Replacement,3-Major Repair, 2-Minor Repair, 1-Patch & Repair,0-No observed need to replace, repair or patchCategory: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need to replace repair or patch Scope

3. Alternative Energy Systems

.1 Geo-Thermal 02/12 NA

.2 Solar 02/12 NA

.3 Other 02/12 NA

1. HVAC Systems.1 Equipment: Condition 02/12 0 M 0 The existing HVAC system consists of roof top package AC

units with gas heat which appear to be approximately 8 years old.

.2 Equipment: Efficiency 02/12 HP

.3 Ductwork 02/12 1 M 1 Ductwork on roof exhibits some rust, recommend painting of exposed ductwork on roof and cleaning of ductwork.

.4 Ventilation 02/12 0 M 0 Systems provide minimum OA, no economizers

.5 EMS Systems: Condition 02/12

.6 EMS Systems: Efficiency 02/12 2 M 1 EMS scheduling should be confirmed. Site maintenance staff indicated that HVAC systems are running when occupants do no require the systems to be on.

.7 Other

2. Specialty Systems.1 Dust Collection 02/12 - - - NA.2 Fume Hoods 02/12 - - - NA.3 Other NA

3. Alternative Energy Systems

.1 Geo-Thermal 02/12 - - - NA

.2 Solar 02/12 - - - NA

.3 Other 02/12 - - - NA

Building - 1B Classrooms

Energy and Atmosphere: Page 32 of 73

Page 37: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Repair / Replace Level: 4-New Replacement,3-Major Repair, 2-Minor Repair, 1-Patch & Repair,0-No observed need to replace, repair or patchCategory: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need to replace repair or patch Scope

1. HVAC Systems.1 Equipment: Condition 02/12 0 M 0 The existing HVAC system consists of roof top package AC

unit with gas heat which appears to be approximately 8 years old.

.2 Equipment: Efficiency 02/12 0 HP 0

.3 Ductwork 02/12 1 M 1 Ductwork is in good condition, recommend cleaning only.

.4 Ventilation 02/12 0 M 0

.5 EMS Systems: Condition 02/12 0 M 0

.6 EMS Systems: Efficiency 02/12 2 M 1 EMS scheduling should be confirmed. Site maintenance staff indicated that HVAC systems are running when occupants do no require the systems to be on.

.7 Other

2. Specialty Systems.1 Dust Collection 02/12 - - - NA.2 Fume Hoods 02/12 - - - NA.3 Other

Building - 2 Multipurpose

Energy and Atmosphere: Page 33 of 73

Page 38: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Repair / Replace Level: 4-New Replacement,3-Major Repair, 2-Minor Repair, 1-Patch & Repair,0-No observed need to replace, repair or patchCategory: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need to replace repair or patch Scope

3. Alternative Energy Systems

.1 Geo-Thermal 02/12 NA

.2 Solar 02/12 NA

.3 Other

1. HVAC Systems.1 Equipment: Condition 02/12 0 M 0 The existing HVAC system consists of roof top package AC

units with gas heat which appear to be approximately 8 years old.

.2 Equipment: Efficiency 02/12 0 HP 0

.3 Ductwork 02/12 1 M 1 Ductwork is in good condition, recommend cleaning only.

.4 Ventilation 02/12 0 M 0 Systems provide minimum OA, no economizers

.5 EMS Systems: Condition 02/12 0 M 0

.6 EMS Systems: Efficiency 02/12 2 M 1 EMS scheduling should be confirmed. Site maintenance staff indicated that HVAC systems are running when occupants do no require the systems to be on.

.7 Other

2. Specialty Systems.1 Dust Collection 02/12 - - - NA.2 Fume Hoods 02/12 - - - NA.3 Other

3. Alternative Energy Systems

.1 Geo-Thermal 02/12 - - - NA

.2 Solar 02/12 - - - NA

.3 Other

Building - 3 Cafeteria & Kindergarten

Energy and Atmosphere: Page 34 of 73

Page 39: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Repair / Replace Level: 4-New Replacement,3-Major Repair, 2-Minor Repair, 1-Patch & Repair,0-No observed need to replace, repair or patchCategory: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need to replace repair or patch Scope

1. HVAC Systems.1 Equipment: Condition 02/12 0 M 0 The existing HVAC system consists of roof top package AC

units with gas heat which appear to be approximately 8 years old.

.2 Equipment: Efficiency 02/12 0 HP 0

.3 Ductwork 02/12 1 M 1 Ductwork is in good condition, recommend cleaning only.

.4 Ventilation 02/12 0 M 0

.5 EMS Systems: Condition 02/12 0 M 0

.6 EMS Systems: Efficiency 02/12 2 HP 1 EMS scheduling should be confirmed. Site maintenance staff indicated that HVAC systems are running when occupants do no require the systems to be on.

.7 Other

2. Specialty Systems.1 Dust Collection 02/12 - - - NA.2 Fume Hoods 02/12 - - - NA.3 Other

3. Alternative Energy Systems

.1 Geo-Thermal 02/12 - - - NA

.2 Solar 02/12 - - - NA

.3 Other

Building - Library & Computer

Energy and Atmosphere: Page 35 of 73

Page 40: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Repair / Replace Level: 4-New Replacement,3-Major Repair, 2-Minor Repair, 1-Patch & Repair,0-No observed need to replace, repair or patchCategory: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need to replace repair or patch Scope

1. HVAC Systems.1 Equipment: Condition 02/12 0 M 0 The existing HVAC systems consist of roof top package AC

units with gas heat and wall mounted HP units which appear to be approximately 8 years old.

.2 Equipment: Efficiency 02/12 0 HP 0

.3 Ductwork 02/12 1 M 1 Ductwork is in good condition, recommend cleaning only.

.4 Ventilation 02/12 0 M 0

.5 EMS Systems: Condition 02/12 0 M 0

.6 EMS Systems: Efficiency 02/12 2 M 1 EMS scheduling should be confirmed. Site maintenance staff indicated that HVAC systems are running when occupants do no require the systems to be on.

.7 Other

2. Specialty Systems.1 Dust Collection 02/12 - - - NA.2 Fume Hoods 02/12 - - - NA.3 Other

3. Alternative Energy Systems

.1 Geo-Thermal 02/12 - - - NA

.2 Solar 02/12 - - - NA

.3 Other

Building - Portables 2 Story Classroom

Energy and Atmosphere: Page 36 of 73

Page 41: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Elig

ible

Po

ints

Act

ual

Po

ints

Eligible Points: P- Prerequisite (Required), 1+ Per CHPS .Actual Points: Per Assessment . . Notes:

CL1.1 Climate Change Action 1-3 0 Intent: Encourage the use of measures that reduce school contributions to greenhouse gas emissions from school design and construction projects.

CL2.1 Grid Neutral 2 0 Intent : Encourage grid neutral schools to conserve energy, and take advantage of clean, efficient renewable energy solutions.

CL2.2 Zero Net Energy 5 0 Intent : Encourage zero net energy schools to conserve energy, take maximum advantage of clean, efficient renewable energy solutions, and to minimize greenhouse gas emissions from primary energy use associated with buildings, typically space heating and cooling, lighting, water heating, and technology/plug loads, for example.

Eligible Points 10 0 Actual Points

CHPS- Sustainable Sites: Summary

2. Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction

1. Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction

Crocker/Riverside Elementary School High Performance Facility Assessment

CHPS SUMMARY: CLIMATE

Credit # / Title

CHPS Summary: Climate: Page 37 of 73

Page 42: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Elig

ible

Po

ints

Act

ual

Po

ints

Eligible Points: P- Prerequisite (Required), 1+ Per CHPS .Actual Points: Per Assessment . . Notes:

ME1.0 Storage and Collection of Recyclables

P P Intent: Facilitate the separation and collection of materials for recycling

ME2.0 Minimum Construction Site Waste Management

P n/a Intent: Divert construction and demolition waste from landfills.

ME2.1 Construction Site Waste Management

1-2 n/a Intent : Divert the amount of construction and demolition waste beyond the prerequisite (ME2.0).

ME3.1 Building Reuse - Structure and Shell

1-2 1 Intent: Increase the reuse of existing building structure and shell.

ME3.2 Building Reuse - Interior Non-structural Elements

1 1 Intent : Increase the reuse of interior non-shell elements.

ME4.1 Recycled Content 1-2 0 Intent: Specify and install recycled content products in order to reduce the environmental impacts associated with extraction and processing of virgin materials.

ME4.2 Rapidly Renewable and Organically Grown Materials

1-2 0 Intent : Specify and install materials that replenish themselves faster than traditional extraction demand and are organically grown.

ME4.3 Certified Wood 1 0 Intent : Specify and install sustainable harvested wood.ME4.4 Salvaged Materials 1-2 0 Intent : Specify and install salvaged materials to limit waste and the use of

raw materials.

ME5.1 Environmentally Preferable Products

1-2 0 Intent: Reward the use of sustainable materials by providing a more flexible option.

ME6.1 Environmental Performance Reporting

1-4 0 Intent: Reward the use of materials that have undergone life cycle analysis (LCA) and/or life cycle impact analysis (LCIA) on the environment and human health.

Eligible Points 18 2 Actual Points

5. Sustainable Materials - Multi Attribute

CHPS- Sustainable Sites: Summary

6. Sustainable Materials - LCIA

4. Sustainable Materials - Single Attribute

1. Recycling

3. Building Reuse

2. Construction Waste Management

Crocker/Riverside Elementary School High Performance Facility Assessment

CHPS SUMMARY: MATERIALS & RESOURCES

Credit # / Title

CHPS Summary: Materials and Resources: Page 38 of 73

Page 43: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Repair / Replace Level: 4-New Replacement,3-Major Repair, 2-Minor Repair, 1-Patch & Repair,0-No observed need to replace, repair or patchCategory: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need to replace repair or patch

.1 Signage 02/12 4 C 3 Non compliant. See 2009 accessibility survey

.2 Door Hardware 02/12 2 C 1 See 2009 accessibility survey

.3 Interior Finishes: Floors Condition

02/12 1 M 1

.4 Interior Finishes: Floors Aesthetic

02/12 0 HP 0

.5 Interior Finishes: Walls Condition

02/12 1 M 1

.6 Interior Finishes: Walls Aesthetic

02/12 4 HP 3 Paint walls

.7 Interior Finishes: Ceilings Condition

02/12 1 M 1

.8 Interior Finishes: Ceilings Aesthetic

02/12 0 HP 0

.9 Interior Finishes: Casework Condition

02/12 2 C 2

.10 Interior Finishes: Casework Aesthetic

02/12 4 HP 1 Update/replace original casework

.11 Interior Finishes: Acoustics - Condition

02/12 - - - NA

.12 Interior Finishes Acoustics - Performance

02/12 HP NA

.13 Window Shades: Condition

02/12 1 M 1 Horizontal blinds

.14 Window Shades: Aesthetic

02/12 0 HP 0

.15 Other

.1 Signage 02/12 4 C 3 Non compliant. See 2009 accessibility survey

.2 Door Hardware 02/12 2 C 1 See 2009 accessibility survey

.3 Interior Finishes: Floors Condition

02/12 2 M 1

.4 Interior Finishes: Floors Aesthetic

02/12 0 M 0

A. INTERIOR SPACE EVALUATION1. Administration

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

Crocker/Riverside Elementary School High Performance Facility Assessment

MATERIALS & RESOURCES

Scope

2. Kindergarten

Materials and Resources: Page 39 of 73

Page 44: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Repair / Replace Level: 4-New Replacement,3-Major Repair, 2-Minor Repair, 1-Patch & Repair,0-No observed need to replace, repair or patchCategory: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need to replace repair or patch Scope

.5 Interior Finishes: Walls Condition

02/12 1 M 1

.6 Interior Finishes: Walls Aesthetic

02/12 0 HP 0

.7 Interior Finishes: Ceilings Condition

02/12 1 M 1

.8 Interior Finishes: Ceilings Aesthetic

02/12 0 HP 0

.9 Interior Finishes: Casework Condition

02/12 0 M 0

.10 Interior Finishes: Casework Aesthetic

02/12 0 HP 0

.11 Interior Finishes: Acoustics - Condition

02/12 0 M 0

.12 Interior Finishes Acoustics - Performance

02/12 0 HP 0

.13 Window Shades: Condition

02/12 0 M 0 No shades

.14 Window Shades: Aesthetic

02/12 4 HP 1

.15 Other

.1 Signage 02/12 4 C 3 Non compliant. See 2009 accessibility survey

.2 Door Hardware 02/12 2 C 1 See 2009 accessibility survey

.3 Interior Finishes: Floors Condition

02/12 1 M 1

.4 Interior Finishes: Floors Aesthetic

02/12 4 HP 1

.5 Interior Finishes: Walls Condition

02/12 2 M 2 Vinyl Wall covering

3. Classrooms

Materials and Resources: Page 40 of 73

Page 45: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Repair / Replace Level: 4-New Replacement,3-Major Repair, 2-Minor Repair, 1-Patch & Repair,0-No observed need to replace, repair or patchCategory: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need to replace repair or patch Scope

.6 Interior Finishes: Walls Aesthetic

02/12 4 HP 1 Paint walls and update folding partitions between classrooms

.7 Interior Finishes: Ceilings Condition

02/12 2 M 2

.8 Interior Finishes: Ceilings Aesthetic

02/12 4 HP 1 Replace ceiling tile

.9 Interior Finishes: Casework Condition

02/12 0 M 0

.10 Interior Finishes: Casework Aesthetic

02/12 2 HP 1

.11 Interior Finishes: Acoustics - Condition

02/12 2 M 1

.12 Interior Finishes Acoustics - Performance

02/12 4 HP 1 Upgrade acoustic partition/wall between classrooms

.13 Window Shades: Condition

02/12 1 M 1

.14 Window Shades: Aesthetic

02/12 0 HP 0

.15 Other

.1 Signage 02/12 4 C 3 Non compliant. See 2009 accessibility survey

.2 Door Hardware 02/12 0 M 0

.3 Interior Finishes: Floors Condition

02/12 0 M 0

.4 Interior Finishes: Floors Aesthetic

02/12 0 HP 0

.5 Interior Finishes: Walls Condition

02/12 0 M 0

.6 Interior Finishes: Walls Aesthetic

02/12 0 HP 0

.7 Interior Finishes: Ceilings Condition

02/12 0 M 0

4. Library & Computer

Materials and Resources: Page 41 of 73

Page 46: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Repair / Replace Level: 4-New Replacement,3-Major Repair, 2-Minor Repair, 1-Patch & Repair,0-No observed need to replace, repair or patchCategory: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need to replace repair or patch Scope

.8 Interior Finishes: Ceilings Aesthetic

02/12 0 HP 0

.9 Interior Finishes: Casework Condition

02/12 1 M 1

.10 Interior Finishes: Casework Aesthetic

02/12 0 HP 0

.11 Interior Finishes: Acoustics - Condition

02/12 0 M 0

.12 Interior Finishes Acoustics - Performance

02/12 0 HP 0

.13 Window Shades: Condition

02/12 1 M 1

.14 Window Shades: Aesthetic

02/12 0 HP 0

.15 Other

.1 Signage 02/12 4 C 3 Non compliant. See 2009 accessibility survey. No identification signs.

.2 Door Hardware 02/12 2 C 2 Door closer opening pressure, threshold repair and secure latching. See 2009 accessibility survey

5. Multipurpose Room

Materials and Resources: Page 42 of 73

Page 47: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Repair / Replace Level: 4-New Replacement,3-Major Repair, 2-Minor Repair, 1-Patch & Repair,0-No observed need to replace, repair or patchCategory: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need to replace repair or patch Scope

.3 Interior Finishes: Floors Condition

02/12 2 M 1 Replace lobby & restroom flooring.

.4 Interior Finishes: Floors Aesthetic

02/12 2 HP 1

.5 Interior Finishes: Walls Condition

02/12 2 M 1 Paint in Lobby & Restroom

.6 Interior Finishes: Walls Aesthetic

02/12 4 HP 1 Paint

.7 Interior Finishes: Ceilings Condition

02/12 1 M 1

.8 Interior Finishes: Ceilings Aesthetic

02/12 0 HP 0

.9 Interior Finishes: Casework Condition

02/12 1 M 1 Repair under stage storage doors

.10 Interior Finishes: Casework Aesthetic

02/12 0 HP 0 NA

.11 Interior Finishes: Acoustics - Condition

02/12 0 M 0

.12 Interior Finishes Acoustics - Performance

02/12 4 HP 1 Add acoustical wall and ceiling panels

.13 Window Shades: Condition

02/12 1 M 1

Materials and Resources: Page 43 of 73

Page 48: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Repair / Replace Level: 4-New Replacement,3-Major Repair, 2-Minor Repair, 1-Patch & Repair,0-No observed need to replace, repair or patchCategory: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need to replace repair or patch Scope

.14 Window Shades: Aesthetic

02/12 4 HP 1 Outdated

.15 Other

.1 Signage 02/12 4 C 3 Non compliant. See 2009 accessibility survey.

.2 Door Hardware 02/12 2 M 1 See 2009 accessibility survey

.3 Interior Finishes: Floors Condition

02/12 2 C 1 Door closer opening pressure and threshold repair. See 2009 accessibility survey

.4 Interior Finishes: Floors Aesthetic

02/12 4 HP 1 Update flooring.

.5 Interior Finishes: Walls Condition

02/12 1 M 1

.6 Interior Finishes: Walls Aesthetic

02/12 0 HP 0

.7 Interior Finishes: Ceilings Condition

02/12 1 M 1

6. Kitchen

Materials and Resources: Page 44 of 73

Page 49: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Repair / Replace Level: 4-New Replacement,3-Major Repair, 2-Minor Repair, 1-Patch & Repair,0-No observed need to replace, repair or patchCategory: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need to replace repair or patch Scope

.8 Interior Finishes: Ceilings Aesthetic

02/12 0 HP 0

.9 Interior Finishes: Casework Condition

02/12 2 M 1

.10 Interior Finishes: Casework Aesthetic

02/12 4 HP 1

.11 Interior Finishes: Acoustics - Condition

02/12 0 0

.12 Interior Finishes Acoustics - Performance

02/12 0 HP 0

.13 Window Shades: Condition

.14 Window Shades: Aesthetic

.15 Other

.1 Signage 02/12 4 C 3 Non compliant. See 2009 accessibility survey.

.2 Door Hardware 02/12 2 C 1 Door closer opening pressure and threshold repair. See 2009 accessibility survey

.3 Interior Finishes: Floors Condition

02/12 1 M 1

.4 Interior Finishes: Floors Aesthetic

02/12 4 HP 1 Update flooring.

.5 Interior Finishes: Walls Condition

02/12 1 M 1

.6 Interior Finishes: Walls Aesthetic

02/12 4 HP 1 Paint

.7 Interior Finishes: Ceilings Condition

02/12 1 M 1

.8 Interior Finishes: Ceilings Aesthetic

02/12 4 HP 1 Paint

.9 Interior Finishes: Casework Condition

02/12 - - - N/A

.10 Interior Finishes: Casework Aesthetic

02/12 - - - N/A

.11 Interior Finishes: Acoustics - Condition

02/12 1 M 1

7. Cafeteria

Materials and Resources: Page 45 of 73

Page 50: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Repair / Replace Level: 4-New Replacement,3-Major Repair, 2-Minor Repair, 1-Patch & Repair,0-No observed need to replace, repair or patchCategory: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need to replace repair or patch Scope

.12 Interior Finishes Acoustics - Performance

02/12 4 HP 1 Add acoustical wall and ceiling panels

.13 Window Shades: Condition

02/12 0 M 0

.14 Window Shades: Aesthetic

02/12 4 HP 1 Install window shades

.15 Other

.1 Signage 02/12 4 C 3 Non compliant, See 2009 accessibility survey.

.2 Door Hardware 02/12 2 C 2 Door closer opening pressure, threshold repair and secure latching. See 2009 accessibility survey

.3 Interior Finishes: Floors Condition

02/12 2 M 2

.4 Interior Finishes: Floors Aesthetic

02/12 4 HP 1 Replace wood floor

.5 Interior Finishes: Walls Condition

02/12 1 M 1

.6 Interior Finishes: Walls Aesthetic

02/12 0 HP 0

.7 Interior Finishes: Ceilings Condition

02/12 1 M 1

.8 Interior Finishes: Ceilings Aesthetic

02/12 0 HP 0

.9 Interior Finishes: Casework Condition

02/12 2 M 2 Repair under stage storage doors

.10 Interior Finishes: Casework Aesthetic

02/12 0 HP 0

.11 Interior Finishes: Acoustics - Condition

02/12 0 M 0

.12 Interior Finishes Acoustics - Performance

02/12 0 HP 0

8. Stage

Materials and Resources: Page 46 of 73

Page 51: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Repair / Replace Level: 4-New Replacement,3-Major Repair, 2-Minor Repair, 1-Patch & Repair,0-No observed need to replace, repair or patchCategory: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need to replace repair or patch Scope

.13 Window Shades: Condition

.14 Window Shades: Aesthetic

.15 Other

.1 Signage 02/12 4 C 3 Non compliant. See 2009 accessibility survey.

.2 Door Hardware 02/12 2 C 1 See 2009 accessibility survey

.3 Interior Finishes: Floors Condition

02/12 2 M 2 Replace flooring

.4 Interior Finishes: Floors Aesthetic

02/12 4 HP 1 Update flooring to ceramic tile

.5 Interior Finishes: Walls Condition

02/12 2 M 2

.6 Interior Finishes: Walls Aesthetic

02/12 4 HP 1 Update with ceramic tile

.7 Interior Finishes: Ceilings Condition

02/12 2 m 2

.8 Interior Finishes: Ceilings Aesthetic

02/12 4 HP 1 Paint

.9 Interior Finishes: Casework Condition

02/12 - - - NA

.10 Interior Finishes: Casework Aesthetic

02/12 - - - NA

.11 Other

.1 Signage 02/12 4 C 3 Non compliant. See 2009 accessibility survey.

.2 Door Hardware 02/12 2 C 1 See 2009 accessibility survey

.3 Interior Finishes: Floors Condition

02/12 2 M 2

9. Restrooms- Staff

10. Restrooms- Students

Materials and Resources: Page 47 of 73

Page 52: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Repair / Replace Level: 4-New Replacement,3-Major Repair, 2-Minor Repair, 1-Patch & Repair,0-No observed need to replace, repair or patchCategory: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need to replace repair or patch Scope

.4 Interior Finishes: Floors Aesthetic

02/12 4 HP 1 Update ceramic tile flooring

.5 Interior Finishes: Walls Condition

02/12 1 M 1

.6 Interior Finishes: Walls Aesthetic

02/12 4 HP 1 Update to ceramic tile

.7 Interior Finishes: Ceilings Condition

02/12 2 M 2

.8 Interior Finishes: Ceilings Aesthetic

02/12 4 HP 1 Paint

.9 Interior Finishes: Casework Condition

02/12 - - - NA

.10 Interior Finishes: Casework Aesthetic

02/12 - - - NA

.11 Other

.1 Signage 02/12 4 C 3 Non compliant. See 2009 accessibility survey.

.2 Door Hardware 02/12 0 M 0

.3 Interior Finishes: Floors Condition

02/12 1 M 1

.4 Interior Finishes: Floors Aesthetic

02/12 0 HP 0

.5 Interior Finishes: Walls Condition

02/12 1 M 1

.6 Interior Finishes: Walls Aesthetic

02/12 0 HP 0

.7 Interior Finishes: Ceilings Condition

02/12 1 M 1

.8 Interior Finishes: Ceilings Aesthetic

02/12 0 HP 0

.9 Interior Finishes: Casework Condition

02/12 1 M 1

.10 Interior Finishes: Casework Aesthetic

02/12 0 HP 0

11. Utility / Support Spaces

Materials and Resources: Page 48 of 73

Page 53: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Repair / Replace Level: 4-New Replacement,3-Major Repair, 2-Minor Repair, 1-Patch & Repair,0-No observed need to replace, repair or patchCategory: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need to replace repair or patch Scope

.11 Interior Finishes: Acoustics - Condition

02/12 - - - NA

.12 Interior Finishes Acoustics - Performance

02/12 - - - NA

.13 Window Shades: Condition

.14 Window Shades: Aesthetic

.15 Other

.1 Signage 02/12 4 C 2 Non compliant, See 2009 accessibility survey.

.2 Door Hardware 02/12 2 C 1 See 2009 accessibility survey

.3 Interior Finishes: Floors Condition

02/12 1 M 1

.4 Interior Finishes: Floors Aesthetic

02/12 0 HP 0

.5 Interior Finishes: Walls Condition

02/12 1 M 1

.6 Interior Finishes: Walls Aesthetic

02/12 0 HP 0

.7 Interior Finishes: Ceilings Condition

02/12 1 M 1

.8 Interior Finishes: Ceilings Aesthetic

02/12 0 HP 0

.9 Interior Finishes: Casework Condition

02/12 - - - N/A

.10 Interior Finishes: Casework Aesthetic

02/12 - - - N/A

.11 Interior Finishes: Acoustics - Condition

02/12 0 M 0

.12 Interior Finishes Acoustics - Performance

02/12 0 HP 0

.13 Window Shades: Condition

.14 Window Shades: Aesthetic

.15 Other

.1 Signage 02/12 4 C 3 Non compliant, See 2009 accessibility survey.

.2 Door Hardware 02/12 2 C 1 See 2009 accessibility survey

.3 Interior Finishes: Floors Condition

02/12 1 M 1

12. Corridors

13. Portables - Classrooms

Materials and Resources: Page 49 of 73

Page 54: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Repair / Replace Level: 4-New Replacement,3-Major Repair, 2-Minor Repair, 1-Patch & Repair,0-No observed need to replace, repair or patchCategory: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need to replace repair or patch Scope

.4 Interior Finishes: Floors Aesthetic

02/12 0 HP 0

.5 Interior Finishes: Walls Condition

02/12 1 M 1

.6 Interior Finishes: Walls Aesthetic

02/12 0 HP 0

.7 Interior Finishes: Ceilings Condition

02/12 1 M 1

.8 Interior Finishes: Ceilings Aesthetic

02/12 0 HP 0

.9 Interior Finishes: Casework Condition

02/12 1 M 1

.10 Interior Finishes: Casework Aesthetic

02/12 0 HP 0

.11 Interior Finishes: Acoustics - Condition

02/12 0 M 0

.12 Interior Finishes Acoustics - Performance

02/12 0 HP 0

.13 Window Shades: Condition

0 M 0

.14 Window Shades: Aesthetic

0 HP 0

.15 Other

.1 Signage 02/12 4 C 2 Non compliant, See 2009 accessibility survey.

.2 Door Hardware 02/12 2 C 1 See 2009 accessibility survey

.3 Interior Finishes: Floors Condition

02/12 0 M 0

.4 Interior Finishes: Floors Aesthetic

02/12 0 HP 0

.5 Interior Finishes: Walls Condition

02/12 0 M 0

.6 Interior Finishes: Walls Aesthetic

02/12 0 HP 0

.7 Interior Finishes: Ceilings Condition

02/12 0 M 0

.8 Interior Finishes: Ceilings Aesthetic

02/12 0 HP 0

.9 Interior Finishes: Casework Condition

02/12 0 M 0 N/A

.10 Interior Finishes: Casework Aesthetic

02/12 0 HP 0 N/A

.11 Interior Finishes: Acoustics - Condition

02/12 0 M 0

14. Teacher Lounge

Materials and Resources: Page 50 of 73

Page 55: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Repair / Replace Level: 4-New Replacement,3-Major Repair, 2-Minor Repair, 1-Patch & Repair,0-No observed need to replace, repair or patchCategory: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need to replace repair or patch Scope

.12 Interior Finishes Acoustics - Performance

02/12 0 HP 0

.13 Window Shades: Condition

0 M 0

.14 Window Shades: Aesthetic

0 HP 0

.15 Other

.1 Roof: Condition 02/12 2 M 3 Poor drainage at roof well

.2 Roof: Performance 02/12 4 HP 1

.3 Skylights 02/12 - - - N/A

.4 Walls / Finishes 02/12 2 M 1

.5 Soffits / Overhangs 02/12 2 M 1

.6 Gutters / Downspouts 02/12 2 M 1

.7 Doors 02/12 2 M 1

.8 Window Systems: Condition

02/12 0 M 0 Single pane metal frame

.9 Window Systems: Performance

02/12 4 HP 1

.10 Covered Walks 02/12 2 M 1

.11 Paint Condition 02/12 2 M 1

.12 Paint Aesthetic 02/12 0 HP 0

.13 Other

.1 Roof: Condition 02/12 2 M 3 Poor drainage at roof well (see Bldg 1A)

.2 Roof: Performance 02/12 4 HP 1

.3 Skylights 02/12 - - - N/A

.4 Walls / Finishes 02/12 2 M 1

.5 Soffits / Overhangs 02/12 2 M 1

1. Building: 1A Classrooms & AdministrationB. EXTERIOR FINISH EVALUATION

2. Building: 1B Classrooms

Materials and Resources: Page 51 of 73

Page 56: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Repair / Replace Level: 4-New Replacement,3-Major Repair, 2-Minor Repair, 1-Patch & Repair,0-No observed need to replace, repair or patchCategory: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need to replace repair or patch Scope

.6 Gutters / Downspouts 02/12 2 M 1

.7 Doors 02/12 2 M 1

.8 Window Systems: Condition

02/12 0 M 0 Single pane metal frame

.9 Window Systems: Performance

02/12 4 HP 1

.10 Covered Walks 02/12 2 M 1

.11 Paint Condition 02/12 2 M 1

.12 Paint Aesthetic 02/12 0 HP 0

.13 Other

.1 Roof: Condition 02/12 2 M 3 Ponding on lower north roof. Correct slope

.2 Roof: Performance 02/12 4 HP 1

.3 Skylights 02/12 - - - NA

.4 Walls / Finishes 02/12 2 M 1

.5 Soffits / Overhangs 02/12 2 M 1

.6 Gutters / Downspouts 02/12 2 M 1

.7 Doors 02/12 2 M 1

.8 Window Systems: Condition

02/12 0 M 0 Single Pane

.9 Window Systems: Performance

02/12 4 HP 1

.10 Covered Walks 02/12 2 M 1

.11 Paint Condition 02/12 2 M 1

.12 Paint Aesthetic 02/12 0 HP 0

.13 Other

3. Building: 2 Multipurpose

Materials and Resources: Page 52 of 73

Page 57: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Repair / Replace Level: 4-New Replacement,3-Major Repair, 2-Minor Repair, 1-Patch & Repair,0-No observed need to replace, repair or patchCategory: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need to replace repair or patch Scope

.1 Roof: Condition 02/12 1 M 1

.2 Roof: Performance 02/12 4 HP 1

.3 Skylights 02/12 - - - NA

.4 Walls / Finishes 02/12 2 M 1

.5 Soffits / Overhangs 02/12 2 M 1

.6 Gutters / Downspouts 02/12 2 M 1

.7 Doors 02/12 2 M 1

.8 Window Systems: Condition

02/12 0 M 0 Single pane metal frame

.9 Window Systems: Performance

02/12 4 HP 1

.10 Covered Walks 02/12 2 M 1

.11 Paint Condition 02/12 2 M 1

.12 Paint Aesthetic 02/12 0 HP 0

.13 Other

.1 Roof: Condition 02/12 1 M 1

.2 Roof: Performance 02/12 4 HP 1

.3 Skylights 02/12 - - - N/A

.4 Walls / Finishes 02/12 2 M 1

.5 Soffits / Overhangs 02/12 2 M 1

.6 Gutters / Downspouts 02/12 2 M 1

.7 Doors 02/12 2 M 1

.8 Window Systems: Condition

02/12 0 M 0

.9 Window Systems: Performance

02/12 0 HP 0

.10 Covered Walks 02/12 - - - N/A

.11 Paint Condition 02/12 2 M 1

.12 Paint Aesthetic 02/12 0 HP 0

.13 Other

5. Building: Library & Computer

4. Building: 3 Kindergarten & Cafeteria

Materials and Resources: Page 53 of 73

Page 58: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Repair / Replace Level: 4-New Replacement,3-Major Repair, 2-Minor Repair, 1-Patch & Repair,0-No observed need to replace, repair or patchCategory: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need to replace repair or patch Scope

.1 Roof: Condition 02/12 1 M 1

.2 Roof: Performance 02/12 4 HP 1

.3 Skylights 02/12 - - - N/A

.4 Walls / Finishes 02/12 2 M 1

.5 Soffits / Overhangs 02/12 2 M 1

.6 Gutters / Downspouts 02/12 2 M 1

.7 Doors 02/12 2 M 1

.8 Window Systems: Condition

02/12 0 M 0

.9 Window Systems: Performance

02/12 0 HP 0

.10 Covered Walks 02/12 2 M 1

.11 Paint Condition 02/12 2 M 1

.12 Paint Aesthetic 02/12 0 HP 0

.13 Other

7. Portables: 4th R.1 Roof: Condition 02/12 0 M 0.2 Roof: Performance 02/12 4 HP 1.3 Skylights 02/12 - - - NA.4 Walls / Finishes 02/12 2 M 1.5 Soffits / Overhangs 02/12 2 M 1.6 Gutters / Downspouts 02/12 2 M 1.7 Doors 02/12 2 M 1.8 Window Systems:

Condition02/12 0 M 0

.9 Window Systems: Performance

02/12 0 HP 0

.10 Covered Walks 02/12 - - - NA

.11 Paint Condition 02/12 2 M 1

.12 Paint Aesthetic 02/12 0 HP 0

.13 Other

6. Portables: 2 Story Classroom

Materials and Resources: Page 54 of 73

Page 59: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Elig

ible

Po

ints

Act

ual

Po

ints

Eligible Points: P- Prerequisite (Required), 1+ Per CHPS .Actual Points: Per Assessment . . Notes:

EQ1.1 Daylighting 1-4 0 Intent: Provide high quality daylighting in classrooms to enhance student performance.

EQ1.2 View Windows 1 Intent : Provide a visual connection to the outdoors.EQ1.3 Electric Lighting 1 Intent: Provide high quality and flexible classroom lighting.

EQ2.0A Minimum HVAC and Construction IEQ

P 0 Intent : Establish minimum HVAC standards and construction practices for indoor air quality.

EQ2.0B ASHRAE 55 Thermal Comfort Code and Moisture Control

P 0 Intent: Provide a thermally comfortable environment with moisture controls.

EQ2.0C Minimum Filtration P 0 Intent : Provide minimum adequate air filtration to ensure good indoor air quality.

EQ2.1 Enhanced Filtration 1-2 0 Intent: Provide adequate air filtration to ensure good air quality.EQ2.2 Low-Emitting Materials 1-4 1 Intent : Provide classrooms with acceptably low indoor air

concentrations of harmful volatile organic chemicals that derive from EQ2.3 Ducted Returns 1 1 Intent: Prevent dust and microbial growth issues associated with

plenum returns.EQ2.4 Thermal Displacement

Ventilation2 0 Intent : Provide effective delivery of ventilation air for improved

occupant comfort, health andproductivity.

EQ2.5 Controllability of Systems

1-4 0 Intent: Enable teachers to have control of the thermal environment within their classrooms.

EQ2.6 Chemical and Pollutant Source

1-2 1 Intent : Prevent building occupants from exposure to potentially hazardous chemicals.

EQ2.7 Mercury Reduction 1 0 Intent: Protect the health of school building occupants, and reduce disposal costs and liability associated with mercury.

EQ3.0 Minimum Acoustical Performance

P Intent: Provide classrooms with adequate acoustical environments.

EQ3.1 Improved Acoustical Performance

1 or 3 Intent : Provide classrooms with superior acoustical environments.

Eligible Points 25 3 Actual Points

CHPS- Sustainable Sites: Summary

3. Acoustics

2. Indoor Air Quality and Thermal Comfort

1. Lighting and Daylighting

Crocker/Riverside Elementary School High Performance Facility Assessment

CHPS SUMMARY: INDOOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

Credit # / Title

CHPS Summary: Indoor Environmental Quality: Page 55 of 73

Page 60: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Repair / Replace Level: 4-New Replacement,3-Major Repair, 2-Minor Repair, 1-Patch & Repair,0-No observed need to replace, repair or patchCategory: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need to replace repair or patch

1. Electrical Systems.1 Utility Service, Main

Switchboard02/12 1 M 0 SMUD transformer, Main Switchboard are relatively new (<10

years old). Could not verify size of electrical service (locked, no keys), assume service size was determined adequate as part of recent renovations.

.2 Other 02/12 2 C 1 800A distribution panel in adjacent storage building possible replacement of original campus switchboard, access to gear is blocked by stored items (code violation)

2. Technology Systems.1 Utility MPOE/MDF 02/12 2 C 1 MPOE - Storage building east of lunch room, shared use with

Kiln, electrical equipment, and storage.MDF - server rack located in Admin work room.Both areas shared used with storage blocks access

.2 Other 02/12 1 M 1 Fiber possibly fed from pole at Robertson Way to weatherhead at kindergarten/cafeteria wing.

3. Low Voltage Systems.1 Clock/PA Head End 02/12 1 M 1 Standard Electric Time Co. at Admin. Building. Owner

indicates 1A, 1B are connected to old system, new system (network?) is district controlled.

Crocker/Riverside Elementary School High Performance Facility Assessment

INDOOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

Scope

Site Utilities & Infrastructure

Indoor Environmental Quality: Page 56 of 73

Page 61: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Repair / Replace Level: 4-New Replacement,3-Major Repair, 2-Minor Repair, 1-Patch & Repair,0-No observed need to replace, repair or patchCategory: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need to replace repair or patch Scope

.2 Fire Alarm Control Panel 02/12 0 - 0 Fire-Lite MS-9600 - fully automatic, addressable, recently upgraded. Fire Alarm wiring in Storage Building is disorganized and exposed.

.3 Access, Intrusion, Security Head End

02/12 0 - 0 Honeywell Intrusion Detection, recorded CCTV with exterior cameras around campus exterior

1. Electrical Systems.1 Electrical Rooms,

Equipment Location:02/12 1 C 0 No electrical rooms, did not observe panels at building interior

.2 Panels and Gear: 02/12 1 M 0 New panels added at building exterior (recent), locked, did not review panels in building

.3 Receptacles / Branch Circuiting

02/12 3 C 2 Many labeled "BAD" but tested fine. Quantity is acceptable. Several broken or missing plate (exposed, energized terminals). Power strips used at classroom computer workstations. No GFCI near sink. Not labeled.

.4 Other

Building - 1A Classroom/Administration

Indoor Environmental Quality: Page 57 of 73

Page 62: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Repair / Replace Level: 4-New Replacement,3-Major Repair, 2-Minor Repair, 1-Patch & Repair,0-No observed need to replace, repair or patchCategory: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need to replace repair or patch Scope

2. Lighting Systems.1 Light Fixtures: Condition 02/12 1 M 1 2x4 acrylic lens, perimeter of classrooms, T8 lamps

.2 Light Fixtures: Efficiency 02/12 4 HP 1 Does not meet CHPS requirements

.3 Controls: Condition 02/12 1 M 1 Multi-level line voltage switching at entry, occ sensors in typicalclassroom. No controls at teaching wall

.4 Controls: Efficiency 02/12 4 HP 1 Does not meet CHPS requirements

.5 Life Safety / Egress 02/12 1 C 0 Exit signs observed.

.6 Other

3. Technology Systems.1 IDF 02/12 1 M 0 Small IDF cabinet in classroom

.2 Infrastructure (Raceway, Cabling)

02/12 1 M 0 Surface Raceway, not routed in dual channel raceway with power.

.3 Workstation / Wireless 02/12 1 M 0 Insufficient quantity of drops at computer workstations in classrooms. Wireless access point observed.

.4 AV Systems 02/12 1 M 0 TV with DVD/VCR observed at most classrooms. Mobile projector cart with document camera, manual screen also observed at most classrooms. Limited or no pathway/cabling infrastructure.

.5 Other

Indoor Environmental Quality: Page 58 of 73

Page 63: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Repair / Replace Level: 4-New Replacement,3-Major Repair, 2-Minor Repair, 1-Patch & Repair,0-No observed need to replace, repair or patchCategory: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need to replace repair or patch Scope

4. Low Voltage Systems.1 Clock / PA 02/12 1 M 0 Original clocks/speakers in each classroom, some exposed

wiring

.2 Fire Alarm (Devices, Appliances)

02/12 0 - 0 Surface raceway, smoke detectors, pull stations, and horn strobes observed.

.3 Access, Intrusion, Security

02/12 1 M 0 Motion sensors in classrooms, cameras on outside of building. Exposed wiring.

.4 Other

1. Electrical Systems.1 Electrical Rooms,

Equipment Location:02/12 1 C 0 No electrical rooms, did not observe panels at classroom

interior, observed branch circuit panel in admin workroom.2 Panels and Gear: 02/12 2 M 1 New panels added at building exterior (recent), locked. Admin

panel is Zinsco, very old and difficult to service and find parts..3 Receptacles / Branch

Circuiting02/12 3 C 2 Many labeled "BAD" but tested fine. Quantity is acceptable.

Several broken or missing plate (exposed, energized terminals). Power strips used at classroom computer workstations. No GFCI near sink. Not labeled.

.4 Other

2. Lighting Systems

Building - 1B Classroom

Indoor Environmental Quality: Page 59 of 73

Page 64: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Repair / Replace Level: 4-New Replacement,3-Major Repair, 2-Minor Repair, 1-Patch & Repair,0-No observed need to replace, repair or patchCategory: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need to replace repair or patch Scope

.1 Light Fixtures: Condition 02/12 1 M 1 2x4 acrylic lens, perimeter of classrooms, T8 lamps. Same fixtures in Admin. User feels front office is over lit.

.2 Light Fixtures: Efficiency 02/12 4 HP 1 Does not meet CHPS requirements

.3 Controls: Condition 02/12 1 M 1 Multi-level line voltage switching at entry, occ sensors in typicalclassroom. No controls at teaching wall. Occ sensor wall switch in admin.

.4 Controls: Efficiency 02/12 4 HP 1 Does not meet CHPS requirements

.5 Life Safety / Egress 02/12 1 C 0 Exit signs observed.

.6 Other

3. Technology Systems.1 IDF 02/12 1 M 0 Small IDF cabinet in classroom.2 Infrastructure (Raceway,

Cabling)02/12 1 M 0 Surface Raceway, not routed in dual channel raceway with

power..3 Workstation / Wireless 02/12 1 M 0 Insufficient quantity of drops at computer workstations in

classrooms. Wireless access point observed.

.4 AV Systems 02/12 1 M 0 TV with DVD/VCR observed at most classrooms. Mobile projector cart with document camera, manual screen also observed at most classrooms. Limited or no pathway/cabling infrastructure.

.5 Other

4. Low Voltage Systems.1 Clock / PA 02/12 1 M 0 Original clocks/speakers in each classroom, some exposed

wiring.2 Fire Alarm (Devices,

Appliances)02/12 0 - 0 Surface raceway, smoke detectors, pull stations, and horn

strobes observed..3 Access, Intrusion,

Security02/12 1 M 0 Motion sensors in classrooms, cameras on outside of building.

Exposed wiring..4 Other

Indoor Environmental Quality: Page 60 of 73

Page 65: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Repair / Replace Level: 4-New Replacement,3-Major Repair, 2-Minor Repair, 1-Patch & Repair,0-No observed need to replace, repair or patchCategory: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need to replace repair or patch Scope

1. Electrical Systems.1 Electrical Rooms,

Equipment Location:02/12 1 C 0 No electrical rooms, panels mounted flush in walls. Panel in

boiler room.2 Panels and Gear: 02/12 3 M 1 Boiler room panel feeds entire building, is new. Panels at

stage are at the end of their serviceable life.

.3 Receptacles / Branch Circuiting

02/12 2 C 1 Receptacles at MP stage are damaged, covered in tape. GFCI receptacles in small kitchen tested OK.

.4 Other

Building - 2 Multipurpose

Indoor Environmental Quality: Page 61 of 73

Page 66: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Repair / Replace Level: 4-New Replacement,3-Major Repair, 2-Minor Repair, 1-Patch & Repair,0-No observed need to replace, repair or patchCategory: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need to replace repair or patch Scope

2. Lighting Systems.1 Light Fixtures: Condition 02/12 3 HP 1 Surface 2x4 fixtures in MP room, T8 lamps, some lamps

burned out. T12 lamps in restrooms. Damaged fixture in custodial room

.2 Light Fixtures: Efficiency 02/12 0 - 0 CHPS does not apply, not a classroom

.3 Controls: Condition 02/12 3 M 1 Line voltage switches. No automatic controls. Switch in kitchen not easily accessible. Manual control of 1000W light

.4 Controls: Efficiency 02/12 0 - 0 CHPS does not apply, not a classroom

.5 Life Safety / Egress 02/12 1 C 0 Exit signs and 'bug-eyes' observed

.6 Other

3. Technology Systems.1 IDF 02/12 1 M 0.2 Infrastructure (Raceway,

Cabling)02/12 3 M 1 Exposed wiring, stapled to wall and painted over

.3 Workstation / Wireless 02/12 2 M 0 Limited quantity

.4 AV Systems 02/12 1 M 1 Peavy PA speakers, audio equipment rack with mixer, amp, and CD player.

.5 OtherIndoor Environmental Quality: Page 62 of 73

Page 67: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Repair / Replace Level: 4-New Replacement,3-Major Repair, 2-Minor Repair, 1-Patch & Repair,0-No observed need to replace, repair or patchCategory: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need to replace repair or patch Scope

4. Low Voltage Systems.1 Clock / PA 02/12 2 M 1 Old clock and bell in MP room, exposed wiring. Clock has

been set up in window, presumably for yard duty staff..2 Fire Alarm (Devices,

Appliances)02/12 0 - 0 Surface raceway, smoke detectors, pull stations, and horn

strobes observed..3 Access, Intrusion,

Security02/12 2 M 1

Motion sensor in entryway, exposed wiring, camera on building.4 Other

1. Electrical Systems.1 Electrical Rooms,

Equipment Location:02/12 1 C 0 No electrical rooms, did not observe panels at building interior

.2 Panels and Gear: 02/12 2 M 1 Did not observe at this wing.

.3 Receptacles / Branch Circuiting

02/12 2 M 2 K classroom - significant surface raceway and exposed conduit. receptacle labeled "BAD" but tested fine. Quantity is acceptable. Not labeled.

.4 Other

2. Lighting Systems.1 Light Fixtures: Condition 02/12 2 HP 1 Kindergarten Classrooms - 2x4 acrylic lens, T8 lamps

Cafeteria - linear pendant lighting T8 (new, but odd layout and fixture selection) and some incandescent pendants. Kitchen lighting inappropriate fixture type.

.2 Light Fixtures: Efficiency 02/12 4 HP 1 Does not meet CHPS requirements

.3 Controls: Condition 02/12 2 M 1 Multi-level line voltage switching at entry, in typical classroom. No controls at teaching wall. Did not observe occupancy sensors.

.4 Controls: Efficiency 02/12 4 HP 1 Does not meet CHPS requirements

.5 Life Safety / Egress 02/12 1 C 0 Exit signs observed.

.6 Other

Building - 3 Kindergarten, Cafeteria

Indoor Environmental Quality: Page 63 of 73

Page 68: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Repair / Replace Level: 4-New Replacement,3-Major Repair, 2-Minor Repair, 1-Patch & Repair,0-No observed need to replace, repair or patchCategory: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need to replace repair or patch Scope

3. Technology Systems.1 IDF 02/12 1 M 0.2 Infrastructure (Raceway,

Cabling)02/12 3 M 1 exposed raceway, exposed wiring

.3 Workstation / Wireless 02/12 2 M 1 Insufficient quantity of drops. Wireless access point observed in Kindergarten classroom, cafeteria

.4 AV Systems 02/12 1 M 0 TV with DVD/VCR observed at K classrooms. Mobile projector cart with document camera, manual screen also observed. Limited or no pathway/cabling infrastructure.

.5 Other

4. Low Voltage Systems.1 Clock / PA 02/12 1 M 0 Original clocks/speakers in each classroom, some exposed

wiring.2 Fire Alarm (Devices,

Appliances)02/12 0 - 0 Surface raceway, smoke detectors, pull stations, and horn

strobes observed..3 Access, Intrusion,

Security02/12 2 M 1 Motion sensors in classrooms, cameras on outside of building.

Significant exposed wiring.

Indoor Environmental Quality: Page 64 of 73

Page 69: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Repair / Replace Level: 4-New Replacement,3-Major Repair, 2-Minor Repair, 1-Patch & Repair,0-No observed need to replace, repair or patchCategory: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need to replace repair or patch Scope

.4 Other

1. Electrical Systems.1 Electrical Rooms,

Equipment Location:02/12 0 - 0 NA

.2 Panels and Gear: 02/12 1 M 0 Panel on building exterior

.3 Receptacles / Branch Circuiting

02/12 3 C 1 Quantity or receptacles not sufficient for computer workstations

.4 Other

2. Lighting Systems.1 Light Fixtures: Condition 02/12 1 M 1 2x4 acrylic lens T8 lamps.

.2 Light Fixtures: Efficiency 02/12 4 HP 1 Does not meet CHPS requirements

.3 Controls: Condition 02/12 2 M 1 Multi-level line voltage switching at entry, no occ sensors.

.4 Controls: Efficiency 02/12 4 HP 1 Does not meet CHPS requirements

.5 Life Safety / Egress 02/12 1 C 0 Exit signs observed.

.6 Other

3. Technology Systems.1 IDF 02/12 1 M 0 Did not observe.2 Infrastructure (Raceway,

Cabling)02/12 1 M 0 Some surface raceway.

Building - Library & Computer

Indoor Environmental Quality: Page 65 of 73

Page 70: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Repair / Replace Level: 4-New Replacement,3-Major Repair, 2-Minor Repair, 1-Patch & Repair,0-No observed need to replace, repair or patchCategory: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need to replace repair or patch Scope

.3 Workstation / Wireless 02/12 2 M 1 Insufficient quantity of drops at computer workstations lead to use of switches, long patch cords. Wireless access point observed.

.4 AV Systems 02/12 0 - 0 N/A

.5 Other

4. Low Voltage Systems.1 Clock / PA 02/12 0 M 0 new clock/speaker.2 Fire Alarm (Devices,

Appliances)02/12 0 - 0

.3 Access, Intrusion, Security

02/12 1 M 0 Motion sensors

.4 Other

1. Electrical Systems.1 Electrical Rooms,

Equipment Location:02/12 0 C 0 No electrical rooms, panels located in each classroom

(modular buildings) Switchgear located building exterior.2 Panels and Gear: 02/12 0 M 0 panels at each classroom.3 Receptacles / Branch

Circuiting02/12 1 M 1 Sufficient quantity receptacles at most locations.

.4 Other

Building - 2-Story Classroom

Indoor Environmental Quality: Page 66 of 73

Page 71: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Repair / Replace Level: 4-New Replacement,3-Major Repair, 2-Minor Repair, 1-Patch & Repair,0-No observed need to replace, repair or patchCategory: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need to replace repair or patch Scope

2. Lighting Systems.1 Light Fixtures: Condition 02/12 2 HP 1 2x4 acrylic lens T8 lamps. Some damage to lens due to low

ceiling

.2 Light Fixtures: Efficiency 02/12 4 HP 1 Does not meet CHPS requirements

.3 Controls: Condition 02/12 2 M 1 Multi-level line voltage switching at entry, no occ sensors. No controls at teaching wall.

.4 Controls: Efficiency 02/12 4 HP 1 Does not meet CHPS requirements

.5 Life Safety / Egress 02/12 1 C 0 Exit signs only at exterior breezeway, 2nd level

.6 Other

3. Technology Systems.1 IDF 02/12 1 M 0.2 Infrastructure (Raceway,

Cabling)02/12 1 M 0 Some surface raceway

.3 Workstation / Wireless 02/12 2 M 0 Insufficient quantity of drops at computer workstations in classrooms. Wireless access point observed.

.4 AV Systems 02/12 2 M 0 TV with DVD/VCR observed at most classrooms. Limited or no pathway/cabling infrastructure.

Indoor Environmental Quality: Page 67 of 73

Page 72: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Dat

e

Rep

air

/ Rep

lace

Lev

el

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Repair / Replace Level: 4-New Replacement,3-Major Repair, 2-Minor Repair, 1-Patch & Repair,0-No observed need to replace, repair or patchCategory: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need to replace repair or patch Scope

.5 Other

4. Low Voltage Systems.1 Clock / PA 02/12 0 M 0 Clock/speaker in each classroom.2 Fire Alarm (Devices,

Appliances)02/12 0 - 0 FA power supply (NAC) observed on wall in classroom.

.3 Access, Intrusion, Security

02/12 1 M 0 Motion sensors in classrooms.

.4 Other

Indoor Environmental Quality: Page 68 of 73

Page 73: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Elig

ible

Po

ints

Act

ual

Po

ints

Eligible Points: P- Prerequisite (Required), 1+ Per CHPS .Actual Points: Per Assessment . . Notes:

LEI1.1 District Level Commitment

2 1 Intent: Gain access to high performance tools and resources and integrate high performance goals into district planning.

LEI1.2 Integrated Design 2 0 Intent : Reduce or eliminate potable water use for landscape irrigation.

LEI2.0 Educational Display P 0 Intent: Increase the school community’s knowledge about the basics of high performance design using an educational display to serve as a three-dimensional textbook.

LEI2.1 Demonstration Areas 1 0 Intent: Provide students, teachers and staff with more in-depth knowledge for each aspect of high performance design on their school site, including sustainable sites, water conservation, energy and material efficiency, and indoor environmental quality.

LEI3.1 Innovation 4 0 Intent: Test, understand and implement innovative approaches to improving the health of school occupants and the performance of school facilities.

LE3.2 Design for Adaptability, Durability and Disassembly

4 0 Intent: Reduce building material waste and promote local building material reuse during construction, renovation, repurposing of space, and disassembly. Provide spaces that are adaptable, durable, and flexible. Drive innovation in designing schools to support disassembly and reuse..

Eligible Points 13 1 Actual Points

Crocker/Riverside Elementary School High Performance Facility Assessment

CHPS SUMMARY: LEADERSHIP, EDUCATION & INNOVATION

Credit # / Title

2. Schools as Learning Tools

1. Leadership

3. Innovation

CHPS- Leadership, Education & Innovation: Summary

CHPS Summary: Leadership, Education and Innovation: Page 69 of 73

Page 74: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Dat

e

Tra

nsf

orm

atio

n /

New

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Transformation / New: T- Transformation is associated to conversion of existing construction andN- New Addition/Expansion of new construction to meet new educational needs.Category: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need

.1 Core Academic & Learning Labs- Elementary Schools

06/12 T HP 3 To align with the District's Strategic Plan 2010-2014 Putting Children First and the Common Core Standards it is recommended that 3,600 s.f. of project lab classrooms be expanded to support Art/Science programs on campus, one for Grades 1-3 and one for Grades 4-6. Also, one Pre-Kindergarten and three Kindergarten Classroom transformation from existing classrooms (4 total) to support the campus Master Plan.

.2 Core Academic & Learning Lab- Furniture Replacement

06/12 T HP 3 To align with the District's Strategic Plan 2010-2014 Putting Children First and the Common Core Standards it is recommended that Furniture Replacement be made to support teaching and learning while creating Student Centered spaces. Furniture replacement has been included based upon desired Classroom loading.

.3 Classroom / Lab Technology Equipment Replacement/ Expansion

06/12 T HP 3 To align with the District's Strategic Plan 2010-2014 Putting Children First and the Common Core Standards it is recommended that Technology Equipment Replacement/Expansion be made to support teaching and learning. The scope and costs associated with the infrastructure is included within the transformation costs. This specifically addresses Equipment costs, which has a budget of $295,000

.4 Support Spaces 06/12 - - - n/a

1. Career & College Ready

Crocker/Riverside Elementary School High Performance Facility Assessment

LEADERSHIP, EDUCATION & INNOVATION

Scope

Leadership, Education Innovation: Page 70 of 73

Page 75: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Dat

e

Tra

nsf

orm

atio

n /

New

Cat

ego

ry

Urg

ency

Sco

re

Transformation / New: T- Transformation is associated to conversion of existing construction andN- New Addition/Expansion of new construction to meet new educational needs.Category: C-Code, M-Maintenance / Operations,HP-High Performance Modernization/TransformationUrgency Score: 3-Critical, 2-Urgent, not critical,1-Moderate, recommended, 0-No observed need Scope

.1 Technology Center- Elementary Schools

06/12 T HP 3 To align with the District's Strategic Plan 2010-2014 Putting Children First and the Common Core Standards it is recommended that a Technology Center be transformed from existing 2,203 s.f. of classrooms and an expansion of the media center to support School and Community Use. It is anticipated that the Technology Center and/or its surrounding program spaces support the following functions; Media Center, Computer Lab, Parent Center, Conference Room & Teacher Planning Center.

.2 Multipurpose Center- Elementary Schools

06/12 N HP 3 To align with the District's Strategic Plan 2010-2014 Putting Children First and the Common Core Standards it is recommended that construction of a 7,536 s.f.Multipurpose Center expansion to address the needs of the existing Dining and Assembly seating capacity. It is anticipated that the Center would provide the following program spaces; Dining, Gym, Assembly, Platform/Stage, Restrooms, Kitchen and Storage.

.1 Classroom Conversion/Expansion

06/12 N HP 3 To align with the District's Strategic Plan 2010-2014 Putting Children First it is recommended that all existing Classroom Portables be replaced and an expansion of 14,316 s.f. of classrooms, Project labs and a Media Center be constructed. The new construction will support 8 classrooms and support space to align with the District's student capacity goals of 552 - 672 students to optimize the campus operations for teaching

3. Organizational Transformation

2. Family & Community Engagement

Leadership, Education Innovation: Page 71 of 73

Page 76: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Code & Life Safety

Maintenance & Operations

High Performance Transformation

Total Includes: C, M/O & HP

1. School Entry/Drop Off $112,320 $7,800 $231,920 $352,0402. Parking & Drives $48,620 $70,070 $309,140 $427,8303. Service Access $0 $27,040 $76,310 $103,3504. Outdoor Activity $78,260 $377,260 $34,450 $489,9705. Campus Core $52,130 $27,300 $130,520 $209,9506. Utilities / Infrastructure $0 $0 $44,070 $44,070

SS Total $291,330 $509,470 $826,410 $1,627,210

1. Site Utilities / Infrastructure $0 $0 $0 $02. Plumbing Systems $13,130 $2,730 $100,360 $116,2203. Specialty Systems $0 $0 $0 $04. Fire Protection Systems $0 $0 $0 $0

WE Total $13,130 $2,730 $100,360 $116,220

1. Central Plant $0 $0 $0 $02. HVAC Systems $0 $234,390 $141,570 $375,9603. Specialty Systems $0 $0 $0 $04. Alternative Energy $0 $0 $0 $0

EA Total $0 $234,390 $141,570 $375,960

1. Signage $29,900 $0 $0 $29,9002. Door Hardware $23,530 $390 $0 $23,9203. Interior Finishes $9,750 $471,380 $671,580 $1,152,7104. Exterior Finishes $0 $810,290 $484,900 $1,295,190

MR Total $63,180 $1,282,060 $1,156,480 $2,501,720

1. Electrical Systems $7,800 $24,700 $0 $32,5002. Lighting Systems $0 $95,680 $577,460 $673,1403. Technology Systems $3,510 $9,230 $0 $12,7404. Low Voltage Systems $0 $10,790 $0 $10,790

IEQ Total $11,310 $140,400 $577,460 $729,170

$2,757,950 $2,757,950$6,280,430 $6,280,430$3,645,980 $3,645,980

IE Total $12,684,360 $12,684,360

Code & Life Safety

Maintenance & Operations

High PerformanceTotal per School

Total per Category $378,950 $2,169,050 $15,486,640 $18,034,640

SUSTAINABLE SITES (SS)

ENERGY & ATMOSPHERE (EA)

WATER EFFICIENCY (WE)

Crocker/Riverside Elementary School High Performance Facility Assessment

TOTAL PROJECT COST SUMMARY

INDOOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY (IEQ)

INNOVATION & EDUCATION (IE)

MATERIALS & RESOURCES (MR)

1. Career & College Ready Transformation2. Family & Community Engagement3. Organizational Transformation

Cost Summary: Page 72 of 73

Page 77: CROCKER/RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLd2qrgk75cp62ej.cloudfront.net/.../cres_-_sfmp_061112_0.pdfCrocker–Riverside Elementary School CRES-III The following is a site organizational concept

Crocker/Riverside Elementary School High Performance Facility Assessment

Insert 1A Diagram

Appendix: Page 73 of 73