cross tested plans - how-to & examples

22
James A. van Iwaarden, FSA, EA Consulting Actuary Van Iwaarden Associates Minneapolis, MN ISCEBS Symposium, Boston September 25, 2013 Cross-Tested Plans

Upload: jim-van-iwaarden

Post on 11-Jul-2015

154 views

Category:

Economy & Finance


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Cross tested plans - how-to & examples

J a m e s A . v a n I w a a r d e n , F S A , E AC o n s u l t i n g A c t u a r y

V a n I w a a r d e n A s s o c i a t e sM i n n e a p o l i s , M N

I S C E B S S y m p o s i u m , B o s t o nS e p t e m b e r 2 5 , 2 01 3

Cross-Tested Plans

Page 2: Cross tested plans - how-to & examples

Today’s Menu

What are cross-tested plans?HistoryCross-testing “recipe”Plan designsOther usesWhat works, what to avoidHow to use cross-tested plans with 401(k)’s

Page 3: Cross tested plans - how-to & examples

What are Cross-Tested Plans?

Plans that don’t fit into IRS pre-approved designsOr...a group of non-identical plansShow nondiscrimination by converting contributions into benefits (cross) and testing the benefits (testing!)

Page 4: Cross tested plans - how-to & examples

History of Cross-Testing – Part I

§401(a)(4)

• ...benefits orcontributions do not discriminate in favor of HCEs...

RR 81-202

• comparability of plans

410(b) & 401(a)(4)

regs• 200+ pages,

early 1990’s

Page 5: Cross tested plans - how-to & examples

History of Cross-Testing – Part II

New Comparability

• a.k.a. class allocation plans, based on the new regulations

Threats to outlaw

• led to “gateways” effective 2002

Stable for 10+ years

• now, even prototype plans include class allocation option

Page 6: Cross tested plans - how-to & examples

Cross-Testing “Recipe” for DC Plans

Go!

Broadly available allocation rates

Gradual age or service schedule

Minimum alloc rate: 5% or 1/3 top HCE

Step 1: pass thru any of three “gateways”

Page 7: Cross tested plans - how-to & examples

Cross-Testing “Recipe” for DC Plans

Step 2: prepare the ingredients

Contribution for each ee

@ 8½% interest

To age 65

÷ annuity factor (we’ll use 10) to get annual benefit

÷ pay = accrual rate

Page 8: Cross tested plans - how-to & examples

Cross-Testing “Recipe” for DC Plans

Step 3: mix it all together

ees w/ rate>=HCE#1

HCE#1

There’s a rate group for each HCE; it includes the HCE & everyone (HCE or NHCE) with a higher accrual rate:

Test each rate group to see if it passes the §410(b) coverage test:• 70% ratio percentage test, or• average benefit percentage testRatio % below is 75% ÷ 50% = 150%

%/HCEs2/4=50%

%/NHCEs3/4=75%

Page 9: Cross tested plans - how-to & examples

Cross-Tested Plan Designs

Common designs include:Age-weighted: guaranteed to passService-weightedClass allocation (aka “new comparability”)DB/DC, usually cash balance & profit sharingExamples for Dr. F & his faithful servants...

Page 10: Cross tested plans - how-to & examples

Cross-Tested Plan Designs

Age Service Pay PS % PS $BenefitAccrual

RateDr. Frankenstein 60 40 $255,000 20% $51,000 3.01%

Igor 40 10 50,000 3.91% 1,955 3.01%

Inga 30 5 30,000 3%* 900 5.22%

Age-weighted profit sharing planAlways passes §401(a)(4) test, but not very flexibleGateway is gradual age or service scheduleOne rate group covers HCE (Dr. F) & both NHCEs, ratio % = 100%

* Age-weighted formula produces 1.73%, but 3% top-heavy minimum applies.

Page 11: Cross tested plans - how-to & examples

Cross-Tested Plan Designs

Age Service Pay PS % PS $BenefitAccrual

RateDr. Frankenstein 60 40 $255,000 20% $51,000 3.01%

Igor 40 10 50,000 5% 2,500 3.85%

Inga 30 5 30,000 3%* 900 5.22%

Service-weighted profit sharing planRewards loyalty, not very commonPS in this example is ½% of pay per year of serviceGateway is gradual age or service scheduleOne rate group covers HCE (Dr. F) & both NHCEs, ratio % = 100%

* Service-weighted formula produces 2.5%, but 3% top-heavy minimum applies.

Page 12: Cross tested plans - how-to & examples

Cross-Tested Plan Designs

Age Service Pay PS % PS $BenefitAccrual

RateDr. Frankenstein 60 40 $255,000 20% $51,000 3.01%

Igor 40 10 50,000 5% 2,500 3.85%

Inga 30 5 30,000 5% 1,500 8.69%

Class allocation (aka “new comparability”) profit sharingVery common, even prototype documents include this optionGateway is minimum allocation 5% or 1/3 of highest HCE rateOne rate group covers HCE (Dr. F) & both NHCEs, ratio % = 100%

Page 13: Cross tested plans - how-to & examples

Cross-Tested Plan Designs

Age PayCash

Balance Credit

PS &3% Safe Harbor

401(k) & Catchup Total

Dr. F’stein 60 $255,000 $230,000 $33,500 $23,000 $286,500

Igor 40 50,000 1,500 3,750 whatever 5,250+401k

Inga 30 30,000 900 2,250 whatever 3,150+401k

DB/DC combo: cash balance & profit sharingCommon for professional firmsEnables large deductible contributions for ownersGateway here is 7½% DC; Igor & Inga get 3% cash balance creditsThis example is for a PBGC-covered plan, Frankenstein Mfg. Inc.

A PBGC-exempt professional firm may need to limit DC er contrs to 6%

Page 14: Cross tested plans - how-to & examples

Other Uses for Cross-Testing

Can structure retirement plans by business unit

Could be all DB, all DC or a combinationIt’s a lifesaver for mergers & acquisitions

Page 15: Cross tested plans - how-to & examples

Other Uses for Cross-Testing

Case study: parent & acquisitions, 25,000 total ees

DB/DC DB only DC onlyCombine all the plans and test on a benefits basisCan apply this for any group of non-identical plans

Page 16: Cross tested plans - how-to & examples

Cross-Testing – What Works, What to Avoid

What works greatProfit sharing / cash balance combination

PS projected at 8½% interestCash balance at interest crediting rate (usually much lower)Better results than pure DB or pure DCEffect is known as

Page 17: Cross tested plans - how-to & examples

Cross-Testing – What Works, What to Avoid

What works great401(k) 3% safe harborYou get a triple dip

Free pass for ADP & ACP testsCovers DC top-heavy requirementCounts for cross-testing base & gateway

A few issuesNotice required >30 days before plan year starts100% vestingCan’t impute “permitted disparity” (FICA recognition) for testing

Add profit sharing, if needed to meet gateway

Page 18: Cross tested plans - how-to & examples

Cross-Testing – What Works, What to Avoid

What to avoidUnfavorable demographics

HCEs younger than othersUsually a solution, but it’s tricky

Inflexible plan designsContribution rates specified in plan documentEven prototypes now allow each participant in own class

Page 19: Cross tested plans - how-to & examples

Cross-Testing – What Works, What to Avoid

What to avoidFailing the §401(a)(4) test!Causes

Demographic changes, especially new young HCEsInflexible plan designs

PreventionTest before contributingFlexible plan designs

Cure§1.401(a)(4)-11(g) corrective amendmentCan provide extra contributions for a targeted group of NHCEsMust be done within 9½ months after end of year

Page 20: Cross tested plans - how-to & examples

Cross-Testing – What Works, What to Avoid

What to avoid401(k) matching contributions (even safe harbor)Really?

Deferrals & match don’t count for 1st stage of §401(a)(4) testYou can still match, but it’s an extra expenseWhat can you do?

Convert match to 3% safe harbor, with advance noticeAdd profit sharing for gateway & cross-testing base

Page 21: Cross tested plans - how-to & examples

Using Cross-Tested Plans with 401(k)’s

Get top people within deferral range of §415 DC maximumIn 2013, that’s $51,000 - $17,500 = $33,500 (13.14% of max pay)

Cover the gateway for NHCEsIf HCEs are at 13.14%, NHCEs need to be at 1/3 of that: 4.38%

Use 3% non-matching safe harborThat leaves only 1.38% needed for NHCE profit sharingFrees HCEs to maximize 401(k) deferrals

Still need to run the testBut gateway is often enough to pass

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

NHCE HCE

DefPSSH

Page 22: Cross tested plans - how-to & examples

Take-Out Menu

Cross-testing is the most powerful testing tool there is!You can structure plans to fit business needsIt makes some amazing plan designs possible