crossing that narrow country bridge into the 21st century r.l. (bob) nielsen agronomy dept., purdue...
TRANSCRIPT
Crossing That Narrow Country Bridge Into the 21st Century
R.L. (Bob) NielsenAgronomy Dept., Purdue UniversityWest Lafayette, IN 47907-1150ph. (765) 494-4802Internet: [email protected]
Feb 1998 R.L. (Bob) Nielsen, Purdue Agronomy
2
What’s on the other side of that bridge?• Cyberspace & ag. information
• GPS, GIS, SSF, PF, & BS
• Designer genes
• Corn may not be just corn anymore
Cyberspace & Ag. Information
Feb 1998 R.L. (Bob) Nielsen, Purdue Agronomy
4
Cyberspace Includes...
• Primarily the Internet– World Wide Web, Gophers, Email, News Groups,
List Servers
• CD-ROM Programs– Purdue’s Corn Growth & Development CD
• Satellite delivery– Good for remote areas
Feb 1998 R.L. (Bob) Nielsen, Purdue Agronomy
5
Advantages of Cyberspace...
• Open 24 hours per day– Good for users– Good for developers
• Content can be revised easily– Encourages timely updates– What I see in the field today can be on the Web
tonight, including digital images– Timely information is appealing to users
Feb 1998 R.L. (Bob) Nielsen, Purdue Agronomy
6
Advantages of Cyberspace...
• Not limited to own information– Links to other folks’ Web sites greatly broadens
scope of information available to clientele from single site
– Encourages collaboration among individuals within and among institutions
– Discourages duplication of efforts in neighboring institutions
Feb 1998 R.L. (Bob) Nielsen, Purdue Agronomy
7
Advantages of Cyberspace...
• Opportunity for use of multimedia– High resolution, color images easily incorporated
into Web documents– Sound, video, and animation somewhat limited
today by…• Skills of developer in many situations• Low speed modem connections of users’ computers• Browser limitations (esp. ‘old’ versions)
Feb 1998 R.L. (Bob) Nielsen, Purdue Agronomy
8
Advantages of Cyberspace...
• Multimedia enhances ability to tell a more complete story– Diagnostic images of diseases or insects– Planter calibration videos– Crop growth & development images and video– Expert’s voice leading you through a tutorial on
interpreting site-specific data
Feb 1998 R.L. (Bob) Nielsen, Purdue Agronomy
9
Advantages of Cyberspace...
• Email offers opportunity to easily…– Communicate one-on-one between user &
“expert”– Share timely information to specific lists of Email
users• County Extension Educators• Farmers• Industry contacts
Feb 1998 R.L. (Bob) Nielsen, Purdue Agronomy
10
Disadvantages of Cyberspace...
• Clientele’s capabilities– Local Internet Service Provider availability– Speed of modem connections– Quality of local phone lines– “Power” of computer itself
• Not as instantaneous as DTN and other satellite delivery systems– Time to dialup & connect can be nuisance
Feb 1998 R.L. (Bob) Nielsen, Purdue Agronomy
11
Disadvantages of Cyberspace...
• Separating junk from fact on the Web is not always easy for layperson– Some advocate need for peer reviews similar to
refereed journals– ‘Snake oil’ products & questionable advice are
already on the Web• My responsibility as an Extension Specialist includes
sorting out the junk from the valuable in reviewing Web sites for my clientele
Feb 1998 R.L. (Bob) Nielsen, Purdue Agronomy
12
“The Best Corn Site on the Web!”
www.agry.purdue.edu/agronomy/ext/corn
Feb 1998 R.L. (Bob) Nielsen, Purdue Agronomy
13
GPS, GIS, SSF, PF, & BS
• GPS: Global Positioning Systems
• GIS: Geographic Information Systems
• SSF: Site-Specific Farming
• PF: Precision Farming
• BS: _________
Feb 1998 R.L. (Bob) Nielsen, Purdue Agronomy
14
Precision Farming: Excitement!
• Color maps are fun to look at!
• Yield monitors are fun to look at!
• Hi-tech wizardry is fun to buy and vendors love to sell it to you!
• Landlords are impressed!
• Finally, maybe we can finally identify and correct those problem areas in our fields once and for all!
Feb 1998 R.L. (Bob) Nielsen, Purdue Agronomy
15
Precision Farming: Tools
• The tools to manage cropland on a site-specific basis are here or are being developed rapidly– Yield monitors– Grid soil sampling – Variable rate applicators & seeders– Portable GPS data recorders– Software to ‘massage’ the data
Feb 1998 R.L. (Bob) Nielsen, Purdue Agronomy
16
Precision Farming: Reality
• Crop yields are influenced by vast array of yield limiting factors (YLF)– Some influence yield directly– Some interact with others to influence yield– Some occur every year, others do not– Some influence different crops differently– Weather interacts with most of them
Which YLF Are Most Important?
Row Spacing
Stand Establ.
Chemical Appl'n
Machinery Adj.
Harv. Date
Diseases
WeedsInsects
Tilth
Fertility
Moisture
Soil Temp.
Air Temp.
Humidity
Sunlight
Rainfall
Plt. Date
Seeding Rate
VarietyTimeliness
Last year?
Next year?
This field?
That field?
Feb 1998 R.L. (Bob) Nielsen, Purdue Agronomy
18
‘Perennial’ Yield Limiting Factors
• The causes of some yield limiting factors occur every year – Soil fertility or pH patterns– Soil drainage patterns– Patterns of perennial weed growth
• These can be identified or attacked with site-specific technology
Feb 1998 R.L. (Bob) Nielsen, Purdue Agronomy
19
‘Sporadic’ Yield Limiting Factors
• Other yield limiting factors occur sporadically over the years...– Diseases & insects, even fertility problems are
greatly dependent on weather
• Site-specific technology can help identify these problems when they occur, but not necessarily prevent their reoccurrence
Feb 1998 R.L. (Bob) Nielsen, Purdue Agronomy
20
Identifying YLFs Is Difficult
• Requires season-long monitoring– For precision farming, will require
monitoring on site-specific basis
• Requires good note-taking skills– You think you’ve got reams of data from the yield
monitor now? Wait until you receive the data from season-long site-specific crop monitoring!
Feb 1998 R.L. (Bob) Nielsen, Purdue Agronomy
21
Identifying YLFs Is Difficult
• Requires good agronomic skills– Esp. crop diagnostic skills– Ability to integrate layers of agronomic
information and relate to yield
• Beware the hazards of correlations!– “That patch of foxtail sure cut yields.”– “My best yields were in an area with twice the
recommended soil K levels.”
Feb 1998 R.L. (Bob) Nielsen, Purdue Agronomy
22
An Example of theHazards of Correlations• Every single person who ate asparagus prior
to 1865 is now dead, therefore…..
• Eating asparagus can be hazardous to your health!
Feb 1998 R.L. (Bob) Nielsen, Purdue Agronomy
23
“That patch of foxtail sure cut yields.”
Maybe that area of the field was also a low spot that ponded last spring, killed off some of the soybean stand, and the foxtail took advantage of the extra sunlight.
So, stand loss rather than foxtail could have been the real culprit.
Feb 1998 R.L. (Bob) Nielsen, Purdue Agronomy
24
“My best yields were in an area with twice the recommended soil K levels.”
Occurred during 1995 drought. Best yielding area was also low, poorly drained area of field
So, maybe the yield response was more due to soil moisture availability differences than to soil potassium levels?
Feb 1998 R.L. (Bob) Nielsen, Purdue Agronomy
25
My Advice?
• Hire a good agronomist to be your Sherlock Holmes!
• You’ll need the season-long expertise to help with the Precision Farming puzzle
Feb 1998 R.L. (Bob) Nielsen, Purdue Agronomy
26
Precision Farming: Challenge
• It may be that we’ll only be able to fine-tune our crop production to a limited extent with site-specific technology– Identify and correct obvious yield limiting factors
such as soil fertility, pH, drainage– Identify and attack certain yield limiting factors
‘on the go’ during the season• e.g., developing pest or disease problems
Feb 1998 R.L. (Bob) Nielsen, Purdue Agronomy
27
Precision Farming: Challenge
• But, we may be limited when trying to site-specifically manage those yield limiting factors that interact heavily with seasonal weather patterns– At least, until we can better predict next year’s
weather!
Designer Genes:The Promise of “Biotech”
Feb 1998 R.L. (Bob) Nielsen, Purdue Agronomy
29
The Promise of “Biotech”
• Biotechnology allows seed companies...– To speed up hybrid development by decreasing the
number of generations required to incorporate improved traits,
– To incorporate traits from other species that have hitherto been unavailable to plant breeders, and
– To charge more for seed!
Feb 1998 R.L. (Bob) Nielsen, Purdue Agronomy
30
‘Biotech’ Products
• Current crops– Bt corn (ECB)– Bt cotton– Liberty tolerant corn– Poast tolerant corn– Roundup tolerant
soybean & corn– STS tolerant soybean
• On the horizon– Bt corn (CRW)
• Way down the road– Drought resistance– Nitrogen fixation– Disease resistance– Antibiotics/vaccines– Yield itself
Feb 1998 R.L. (Bob) Nielsen, Purdue Agronomy
31
‘Biotech’ Is Just A Tool
• Hybrid improvement also requires genetic and physiological research in order to identify desirable traits and the gene(s) that code for their expression– ‘Biotech’ products to date are primarily single gene
traits– Multiple gene traits are more difficult to work with,
yet account for many important crop traits
Feb 1998 R.L. (Bob) Nielsen, Purdue Agronomy
32
Evaluating “Biotech” Varieties
• Evaluate ‘biotech’ varieties like you would any other ‘normal’ variety…– Yield potential compared to other elites
• Consider ‘yield drag’ or ‘yield lag’ effects
– Characteristics desirable for your farm– Frequency of payback for improved trait
• e.g., How many years in ten do European corn borers cause economic yield loss in your farming operation?
Corn May Not Be Just Corn On The Other Side of That Bridge!
Feb 1998 R.L. (Bob) Nielsen, Purdue Agronomy
34
Some Folks Say...
• Within a few years, there won’t be such a thing as no. 2 yellow dent corn anymore!
Feb 1998 R.L. (Bob) Nielsen, Purdue Agronomy
35
Some Folks Say...
• No. 2 yellow dent corn no more!
• Corn with value-added characteristics will be grown for specific niche markets that differ greatly from the traditional 4-legged ones of the past.
Feb 1998 R.L. (Bob) Nielsen, Purdue Agronomy
36
Some Folks Say...
• No. 2 yellow dent corn no more!• Specific niche markets for corn.
• Farmers will profit greatly from the production of value-added identity-preserved (I-P) crops.
Feb 1998 R.L. (Bob) Nielsen, Purdue Agronomy
37
What Are I-P Crops?
• Any crop marketed for...– Specific end uses based on a particular variety or
set of genetic traits, and for – Which a premium is paid above the price for the
crop as a raw commodity.
• I-P crops are not new...
Feb 1998 R.L. (Bob) Nielsen, Purdue Agronomy
38
I-P Crops Are Not New!
• Seed corn, soybean, wheat, oats, etc.
• Popcorn• Sweetcorn• Waxy starch corn• High lysine corn• White corn
• High amylose starch corn
• High oil corn • High protein soybean
for tofu• Low-saturated-fat
soybean
Feb 1998 R.L. (Bob) Nielsen, Purdue Agronomy
39
Characteristics of I-P Crop Production• Specific crop varieties often required.
– Bred for specific genetic traits.• Ah.....the potential for biotechnology!
– Sex with adjacent fields often prohibited.• Cross-pollination often ‘contaminates’ grain with
undesirable genes that ‘dilute’ the desired trait.
Feb 1998 R.L. (Bob) Nielsen, Purdue Agronomy
40
Characteristics of I-P Crop Production• Specific crop varieties sometimes required.
• Specific inputs (or lack thereof) are sometimes required.– For example, organic production practices for
food grade grain may be required.
Feb 1998 R.L. (Bob) Nielsen, Purdue Agronomy
41
Characteristics of I-P Crop Production
• Specific crop varieties sometimes required.• Specific inputs (or lack thereof) are sometimes
required.
• Seed must be harvested and stored separately from that of other fields.– To avoid ‘contamination’ with other varieties.– All the way from field to market.
Feb 1998 R.L. (Bob) Nielsen, Purdue Agronomy
42
Characteristics of I-P Crop Production• Specific crop varieties sometimes required.• Specific inputs (or lack thereof) are sometimes
required.• Seed must be harvested and stored separately from
that of other fields.
• Grower contracts usually advisable.– Protects from the uncertainty of spot markets.
Feb 1998 R.L. (Bob) Nielsen, Purdue Agronomy
43
Advantages of I-P Crops...
• Allow growers to benefit economically from added value of crops.– Through market premiums for the grain.– Through guaranteed markets for the grain.– Possibly by participating in ownership of
I-P ventures?
Feb 1998 R.L. (Bob) Nielsen, Purdue Agronomy
44
Advantages of I-P Crops...
• Allow growers to benefit economically from added value of crops.
• Allow seed researchers to recapture costs of new genetic technology.– Through higher seed prices.– Through partnerships with other industries.
Feb 1998 R.L. (Bob) Nielsen, Purdue Agronomy
45
Advantages of I-P Crops...
• Allow growers to benefit economically from added value of crops.
• Allow seed researchers to recapture costs of new genetic technology.
• Allow end-users to create even greater value-added outputs more efficiently.– Grain with high levels of desired constituents.– Grain with improved milling characteristics.
Feb 1998 R.L. (Bob) Nielsen, Purdue Agronomy
46
Disadvantages of I-P Crops...
• Genetic ‘baggage’ sometimes restricts yield or other agronomic characteristics.– Yield “drag”
• Sometimes, “bad” genes come along for the ride with the targeted genes.
– Yield “lag”• Sometimes new traits are not yet incorporated into
elite hybrids.
Feb 1998 R.L. (Bob) Nielsen, Purdue Agronomy
47
Disadvantages of I-P Crops...
• Genetic “baggage”
• Value-added characteristics sometimes influenced by ‘Mother Nature’ or production practices.– Protein content– Oil content
Feb 1998 R.L. (Bob) Nielsen, Purdue Agronomy
48
Disadvantages of I-P Crops...
• Genetic “baggage”• Influence of “Mother Nature”
• Niche markets can fill or expire quickly.– How many acres of ‘baby corn’ does it take to
saturate the salad bar market?– Some I-P ventures will fluctuate greatly from year
to year.– Some I-P ventures will fail.
Feb 1998 R.L. (Bob) Nielsen, Purdue Agronomy
49
Disadvantages of I-P Crops...
• Genetic “baggage”• Influence of “Mother Nature”• Niche markets can fill quickly.
• Harvest & handling requires extra TLC– Quality of product more important
Feb 1998 R.L. (Bob) Nielsen, Purdue Agronomy
50
Disadvantages of I-P Crops...
• Genetic “baggage”• Influence of “Mother Nature”• Niche markets can fill quickly.• Harvest & handling requires extra TLC
• Local infrastructure (elevators) often not adequate for large-scale I-P crop production.– Isolation to maintain identity and purity will likely
be on-farm.
Feb 1998 R.L. (Bob) Nielsen, Purdue Agronomy
51
Potential for Indiana Agriculture
• ‘Plain old’ no. 2 yellow dent corn will continue to be grown into the near future.– Its ‘dirt cheap’ price is attractive to industry.– A lot of ‘plain old’ cows & pigs still exist.– Int’l grain trade will likely still demand it.
Feb 1998 R.L. (Bob) Nielsen, Purdue Agronomy
52
Potential for Indiana Agriculture
• No. 2 yellow dent corn will still be grown.
• I-P crop technology will require aggressive entrepreneuring.– For universities and industry in developing the new
end-uses and new markets.– For local infrastructure in gearing up to handle the
isolation and TLC requirements of I-P.– For farmers in seeking out I-P opportunities.
Feb 1998 R.L. (Bob) Nielsen, Purdue Agronomy
53
Potential for Indiana Agriculture
• Nonetheless, I-P crop production WILL become more prevalent in Indiana.– Grain composition traits useful for specific industrial
uses.– Grain quality traits for improving animal feed use
efficiency, both on-farm and off. – Farmer cooperatives contracting directly with end-
users to provide ‘plain old’ grain, but with guarantee of quality or variety.
Feb 1998 R.L. (Bob) Nielsen, Purdue Agronomy
54
Purdue Agriculture
“Farming is a kind of continual miracle wrought by the hand of God.”-- Benjamin Franklin
As you cross that bridge, remember this...