crossref: scholarly metadata exchange · crossref manages the open funder registry, a curated list...
TRANSCRIPT
Jennifer Lin, PhD@jenniferlin15
orcid.org/0000-0002-9680-2328
Council for Science Editors Annual Meeting, 17 May 2016
Crossref: scholarly metadata exchange
Who funded the research?
Funder mandates are increasing
HORIZON 2020
Source: http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/juliet/
Crossref funding data (previously FundRef)
11,000 funders in the registry853,000+ deposits with funder ID
272 publishers deposited funding data
• Standardization of funder names using the Open Funder Registry
• Publisher deposit of funding metadata• Large-scale analysis and reporting to funders
Who funded the research?
National Institutes of HealthNIH N.I.H. National Institute of HealthNational Institute for HealthAbbreviations, misspellings, translations...
Open Funder Registry
• List of funders and unique funder identifier• Openly available on Github: https://github.com/CrossRef/
open-funder-registry • Repository contains all versions and release notes• CC0 license waiver• Easily integrated in any system that collects funding
information (ex: submission system, finance system, publication tracking system, etc.)
http://search.crossref.org/fundref
http://api.crossref.org
Conducts$
To increase the valueof Crossref funding datafor all, we need:–– all publishers to deposit accurate funder names andIDs in their metadata
–– all funders to make use ofour search interfaces and APIsto retrieve valuable information about the publications that are resulting from their grants
And we need your help in coming up with ideas on howto reach both groups. We’re holding a contest during the meeting for the best outreach ideas. Make them as creative and impactful as you can as prizes will be awarded at theend of Day 2.
Crossref manages the Open Funder Registry, a curated list of over 11,000 international funding bodies. As publishers deposit metadata with us,we are the only central source of funding acknowledgements in publications. We link funders to these research outputs and make this availableto funders, publishers, researchers, service providers so that the entire research ecosystem can track the impact of research funding.
Crossref #fundingdata ContestResearcher
Grant
Research
Reports
Sub
mits
#fundingdata
Paperaboutresults
Metadataincluding funding
acknowledgements
Otherservices Receives
Funder
Results
App
lies
toDeposits
Publishers
To
Funding data summary
• Crossref’s database is the only central source of standardised funding acknowledgements from publications
• Accuracy of funding metadata is critical • An increasing number of organizations and
projects rely on this funding data to identify content and check compliance with funder policies
Clinical Trials metadata
Clinical trial metadata
Three new fields available in the metadata deposit:
• clinical trial number• clinical trial registry where trial is registered• trial stage (pre-results, results, post-results of the trial)
Linked Clinical Trials pilot
• Deposit of registered clinical trial numbers (CTNs) referenced in articles• Links to other articles that also reference the same CTN• Pre-results, results, post-results all threaded together• Display all linked publications in CrossMark directly on
article landing page
CrossMark display
Participating publishersPublishers who have deposited CTN data to date:
Foundational Infrastructure
Metadata enable connections
an open scholarly map for the whole research enterprise
DOI DOI
DOIDOI
DOI
Thank you
Noun Project contributors: BlueTip Design, Jose Moya, Gira Park, Jérôme Poslednik, Adame Dahmani, Simple Icons, Mani Amini
Jennifer Lin, [email protected]
@jenniferlin15orcid.org/0000-0002-9680-2328
Crossref funder matching
Attempting to match deposited funder names with no ID
Very conservative approach
Picking up about 26% of names with no IDs
50k funder names per month with no ID