crowdfunding platforms as - middlesex university · three recent inquiries into cf •crowdfunding...

28
Crowdfunding Platforms as Super-Catalysts in an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Prof. Dr. Othmar M Lehner [email protected] based on current research by Othmar Lehner and Theresia Harrer 2016-2017 1

Upload: others

Post on 23-Jun-2020

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Crowdfunding Platforms as - Middlesex University · Three Recent Inquiries into CF •Crowdfunding Platforms as Super-Catalysts in an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem –Lehner & Harrer

Crowdfunding Platforms asSuper-Catalysts

in an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem

Prof. Dr. Othmar M Lehner

[email protected]

based on current research by

Othmar Lehner and Theresia Harrer 2016-2017

1

Page 2: Crowdfunding Platforms as - Middlesex University · Three Recent Inquiries into CF •Crowdfunding Platforms as Super-Catalysts in an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem –Lehner & Harrer

Three Recent Inquiries into CF

• Crowdfunding Platforms as Super-Catalysts in an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem – Lehner & Harrer (2017), British Academy of Management -

forthcoming

• Entrepreneurial Implications of Crowdfunding– Lehner, Ennsgraber & Grabman (2015), Venture Capital -

Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance

• Formation and Interplay of Social Capital in CF– Lehner (2014), Entrepreneurship & Regional Development

2

Page 3: Crowdfunding Platforms as - Middlesex University · Three Recent Inquiries into CF •Crowdfunding Platforms as Super-Catalysts in an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem –Lehner & Harrer

3Types and Platforms, Source: Lehner

Page 4: Crowdfunding Platforms as - Middlesex University · Three Recent Inquiries into CF •Crowdfunding Platforms as Super-Catalysts in an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem –Lehner & Harrer

4

An entrepreneurial ecosystem refers to

the social and economic environment affecting the local/regional entrepreneurship.

… it can also be a group of companies, including start-ups, and one or more coordination (focal) entities, which share similar goals and decide to form a network or organization in order to explore economies of scale combined with flexibility and entrepreneurial "drive".

Pitelis, Christos (2012) "Clusters, entrepreneurial ecosystem co-creation, and appropriability: a conceptual framework." Industrial and Corporate Change: Oxford University Press

Page 5: Crowdfunding Platforms as - Middlesex University · Three Recent Inquiries into CF •Crowdfunding Platforms as Super-Catalysts in an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem –Lehner & Harrer

Research Design:

23 crowdfunding cases which were successfully funded on 11 different platforms with a total funded sum of 77,210,781 USD. The selection being based upon the criteria of being either exemplary as identified in the literature or exceptional (Uy et al., 2009). Inductive coding with inter-coder reliability and theme building (Denzin et al. 2012).

• What are the value propositions of CF Platforms?

• What is the influence of CF Platforms as focal actors on the whole field from a neo-institutionalist perspective?

• What can be derived from the specific context for broader entrepreneurship research on focal actors in ecosystems?

Following Cornelissen’s (2017) AMR styles of theorizing, we aim to:“explain the fuzzy nature of many subjects by logically and causally combining different constructs into a coherent and explanatory set of types”

5

Page 6: Crowdfunding Platforms as - Middlesex University · Three Recent Inquiries into CF •Crowdfunding Platforms as Super-Catalysts in an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem –Lehner & Harrer

6

Platform Main Type of CF Geographic Scope Number Cases/

Documents

Cases Total Funding Volumes

(USD)

03 Crowdcube Equity, Debt UK, US 3 / 35 2,357,156

01 Kickstarter Reward US, worldwide 6 / 57 52,887,966

02 Indiegogo Reward, Equity, Donation US, worldwide 7 / 63 17,456,597

(12,810,000*)

04 Australian Small Scale

Offerings Board

Equity, Debt AUS, worldwide 2 / 29 799,156

05 1000x1000 Reward/Debt AT 2 / 26 2,142,969

06 Symbid Equity US, Europe 1 / 24 1,263,146

07 Kiva Lending US, worldwide 0 / 16 Platform only

08 RocketHub Equity US 0 / 9 Platform only

09 Fundly Donations US, worldwide 1 / 7 3,790

10 GoFundMe Lending, Social/ Personal

Fundraising

US 0 / 5 Platform only

11 MicroVentures Equity, Venture Capital,

Business Angels

US, worldwide 1 / 3 300,000

General Documents Non-specific worldwide 34

Aggregated Info Types of Cases:

Reward 9

Equity 8

Donation 3

In-Demand 1

Reward / Lending

2

Industry of Cases:

High Tech 8

Hygiene 1

Tourism 3

Social 2

Software 4

Consumer 4

Personal 1

Total:

11 platforms,

23 cases and

308 documents

Total funds:

77,210,781 USD

* has not been transferred because

threshold was not reached, not

included in total

Statistics on Platforms, Cases and Documents

Page 7: Crowdfunding Platforms as - Middlesex University · Three Recent Inquiries into CF •Crowdfunding Platforms as Super-Catalysts in an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem –Lehner & Harrer

7

Financial Intermediary

Accelerator

Information Broker

Expert

Advocator

Catalyst

Roles:

Page 8: Crowdfunding Platforms as - Middlesex University · Three Recent Inquiries into CF •Crowdfunding Platforms as Super-Catalysts in an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem –Lehner & Harrer

8

Financial

Intermediary

The platform acts as an

intermediary between the

ventures and the crowd,

complies and enforces

compliance with a complex

set of regulations.

It offers various types of

capital and uses some form

of commission as a revenue

stream.

Seen in all cases,

building the

foundation of CF

Original Value

Proposition

Financial

Intermediation

(Haas et al.,

2014)

Page 9: Crowdfunding Platforms as - Middlesex University · Three Recent Inquiries into CF •Crowdfunding Platforms as Super-Catalysts in an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem –Lehner & Harrer

9

Financial Intermediary Role

Page 10: Crowdfunding Platforms as - Middlesex University · Three Recent Inquiries into CF •Crowdfunding Platforms as Super-Catalysts in an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem –Lehner & Harrer

10

Accelerator The platform actively

acknowledges and supports

growth and scaling strategies

through active promotion and

collaboration with other

providers.

Often several stages of CF with

different types of capital in

combination with traditional

forms and market-channels

are targeted.

Signals are actively created to

attract economic capital.

Indiegogo

InDemand,

Microventures,

ASSOB

Signalling and

Legitimacy

(Ryu and Kim, 2016;

Kromidha and

Robson, 2016;

Ahlers et al., 2015),

Social Capital,

Networking Theory

(Skirnevskiy et al.,

2017; Colombo et

al., 2015)

Page 11: Crowdfunding Platforms as - Middlesex University · Three Recent Inquiries into CF •Crowdfunding Platforms as Super-Catalysts in an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem –Lehner & Harrer

11

Symbolic Capital

Social Capital

Cultural Capital

Economic

CapitalEntrepreneur(s)

engage

Opportunityenables exploitation

Bourdieu’s Social Capital in Crowdfunding, Source: Lehner 2014

Accelerator Role

Page 12: Crowdfunding Platforms as - Middlesex University · Three Recent Inquiries into CF •Crowdfunding Platforms as Super-Catalysts in an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem –Lehner & Harrer

12

Information

Broker

The platform provides

investor-relations relevant

tools, checklists and

communication channels

in a standardized way.

Through this the

transaction costs are

reduced and a functioning

market is enabled.

Crowdcube,

ASSOB, Symbid,

RocketHub,

GoFundMe

Information

Economics

(Belleflamme et al.,

2015),

Transaction Cost

Theory (Scholes et

al., 1976),

Human Computer

Interaction (Prpic

and Shukla, 2016)

Page 13: Crowdfunding Platforms as - Middlesex University · Three Recent Inquiries into CF •Crowdfunding Platforms as Super-Catalysts in an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem –Lehner & Harrer

13

Information Broker Role

Page 14: Crowdfunding Platforms as - Middlesex University · Three Recent Inquiries into CF •Crowdfunding Platforms as Super-Catalysts in an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem –Lehner & Harrer

14

Expert The platform offers value

through its expert role, for

example through consulting

services and expert rounds.

Often specifically tailored to

niche positions. From a

critical perspective,

platforms can limit and lead

to uniform configurations

through a restrictive and in-

transparent selection

process.

Kickstarter,

1000x1000,

Kiva

Symbid

Configuration

Theory

(Miller, 1986),

Neo-

Institutionalism,

(Chaney et al.,

2016),

Power and

Discourse

(Beaulieu et al.,

2015)

Page 15: Crowdfunding Platforms as - Middlesex University · Three Recent Inquiries into CF •Crowdfunding Platforms as Super-Catalysts in an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem –Lehner & Harrer

15

Expert Role

Page 16: Crowdfunding Platforms as - Middlesex University · Three Recent Inquiries into CF •Crowdfunding Platforms as Super-Catalysts in an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem –Lehner & Harrer

16

Expert Role – (Reflexive) Isomorphism

Page 17: Crowdfunding Platforms as - Middlesex University · Three Recent Inquiries into CF •Crowdfunding Platforms as Super-Catalysts in an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem –Lehner & Harrer

17

Advocator The platform acts as powerful

contributor to the CF

discourse, for example by

influencing policy makers and

legislation.

Besides the common ground

with the ventures there is also

a considerable power-play

involved.

ECN,

Symbid,

Indiegogo,

1000x1000,

RocketHub

National CF

Association of

Canada (NCFA)

Power and

Discourse,

Legislation (Coke,

2017),

Advocacy, Social

Movement

(Steinberg, 2017)

Page 19: Crowdfunding Platforms as - Middlesex University · Three Recent Inquiries into CF •Crowdfunding Platforms as Super-Catalysts in an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem –Lehner & Harrer

19

Catalyst The platform uses its public

outreach to target new

markets and introduce new

and innovative services and

products.

Through this, ventures which

are seen as relevant from a

societal perspective but are

underfunded by traditional

sources gain traction and can

exploit their opportunities.

Microventures,

Kiva,

Fundly,

GoFundMe,

Generosity

Indiegogo,

Innovation (Lehner

et al., 2015;

Partanen et al.,

2014),

Social

Entrepreneurship,

Impact Investing

(Lehner, 2013),

Legitimacy (Fisher

et al., 2017;

Frydrych et al.,

2014)

Page 20: Crowdfunding Platforms as - Middlesex University · Three Recent Inquiries into CF •Crowdfunding Platforms as Super-Catalysts in an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem –Lehner & Harrer

20

Catalyst Role

Page 21: Crowdfunding Platforms as - Middlesex University · Three Recent Inquiries into CF •Crowdfunding Platforms as Super-Catalysts in an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem –Lehner & Harrer

21

Most Frequent Themes Most Frequent Tropes

Empowerment (15) Community (11)

Self Determination (9) Entrepreneurship (11)

Health (6) Strong Woman (9)

Body Image (6) Natural Woman (8)

Sharing Economy (5) Sexuality (7)

Ongoing Research on 42 CF cases: Feminist Perspectives in CF: A Discourse Analysis – Harrer/LehnerForthcoming in 2017

Catalyst Role

Page 22: Crowdfunding Platforms as - Middlesex University · Three Recent Inquiries into CF •Crowdfunding Platforms as Super-Catalysts in an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem –Lehner & Harrer

22

Financial Intermediary

Accelerator

Information Broker

Expert

Advocator

Catalyst

Roles:

Page 23: Crowdfunding Platforms as - Middlesex University · Three Recent Inquiries into CF •Crowdfunding Platforms as Super-Catalysts in an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem –Lehner & Harrer

Concluding

• Crowdfunding can indeed be understood as an ecosystem with actors, links and positions, and with CF Platforms as focal, coordinating actors.

• CF Platforms claim several value propositions through their roles, from intermediaries to advocators, accelerators, information brokers, catalysts and experts.

• From a neo-institutionalist perspective, this brings with the danger of a reflexive isomorphism and an unnatural narrowing of the field.

• For entrepreneurship research in general, CF displays the necessity for interdisciplinary approaches, and the potential need for a revised epistemology, as we need to cater for both, a socially constructed nature (see e.g. feminist themes) as well as a pragmatic view on contextualized generalizations. 23

Page 24: Crowdfunding Platforms as - Middlesex University · Three Recent Inquiries into CF •Crowdfunding Platforms as Super-Catalysts in an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem –Lehner & Harrer

July 2016: 780pp, 95 illustrationsHb: 978-1-138-77754-5 | £125.00eBook: 978-1-315-77257-8

Page 25: Crowdfunding Platforms as - Middlesex University · Three Recent Inquiries into CF •Crowdfunding Platforms as Super-Catalysts in an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem –Lehner & Harrer

Ongoing Research

Future Perspectives & Outlook

Invitation to Collaborate!

25

Page 26: Crowdfunding Platforms as - Middlesex University · Three Recent Inquiries into CF •Crowdfunding Platforms as Super-Catalysts in an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem –Lehner & Harrer

Current Research: C-FIT

• Feminist Perspectives in CF

• The Role of Platforms as Intermediaries

• Signaling and Trust in CF

• Rules & Regulations: International Comparison

• Behavioural Finance and CF

• Matchmaking: Textual and Visual (Re)Presentation

• The building of Legitimacy: Ventures and CF

• Transaction Cost Theory to explain CF26

Page 27: Crowdfunding Platforms as - Middlesex University · Three Recent Inquiries into CF •Crowdfunding Platforms as Super-Catalysts in an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem –Lehner & Harrer

Crowdfunding Platforms asSuper-Catalysts

in an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem

Prof. Dr. Othmar M Lehner

[email protected]

based on current research by

Othmar Lehner and Theresia Harrer 2016-2017

27

Page 28: Crowdfunding Platforms as - Middlesex University · Three Recent Inquiries into CF •Crowdfunding Platforms as Super-Catalysts in an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem –Lehner & Harrer

28