cs-ee 481 spring 2006 1founder’s day, 2006 university of portland school of engineering electric...

33
CS-EE 481 Spring 2006 Founder’s Day, 2006 1 University of Portland School of Engineering Electric Vehicle Drive System Authors Steven Arlint Abdullah Binsaeed Dustin Buscho Advisor Dr. Robert J. Albright Industry Representative Mr. Paul M. Menig Freightliner

Upload: tyler-harmon

Post on 01-Jan-2016

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

CS-EE 481 Spring 2006

Founder’s Day, 2006 1University of Portland School of Engineering

Electric Vehicle Drive System

AuthorsSteven Arlint

Abdullah Binsaeed

Dustin Buscho

AdvisorDr. Robert J. Albright

Industry RepresentativeMr. Paul M. Menig

Freightliner

CS-EE 481 Spring 2006

Founder’s Day, 2006 2University of Portland School of Engineering

Agenda

• Introduction Dustin Buscho• Background Dustin Buscho• Methods Steven Arlint• Results Steven Arlint• Conclusions Abdullah Binsaeed• Demonstration Abdullah Binsaeed

CS-EE 481 Spring 2006

Founder’s Day, 2006 3University of Portland School of Engineering

Introduction• Light Weight Electric Vehicle Drive System• Designed for motor scooter or motorcycle• Designed to compete against gasoline based systems• It is an important technology for inner-city commuting• Solves problem of lack of purpose built electronics

CS-EE 481 Spring 2006

Founder’s Day, 2006 4University of Portland School of Engineering

Background: drive system

• Driver and vehicle weight of approximately 450 lbs.

• Target speed of 35 MPH• No target range (depends on batteries used)• Main emphasis on the motor control and feedback• Displays data

CS-EE 481 Spring 2006

Founder’s Day, 2006 5University of Portland School of Engineering

Background

• 450 lb weight is

for 170 lb. rider• Used go-kart chassis

for approximation

CS-EE 481 Spring 2006

Founder’s Day, 2006 6University of Portland School of Engineering

Background: speed of 35 MPH

• Requires adequate power in controller• 120 volts, 50 amperes continuous (6 KW)• Peak power of 15 KW• 120 volt motor and battery needed

CS-EE 481 Spring 2006

Founder’s Day, 2006 7University of Portland School of Engineering

Background: no target range

• Lead acid vs. Nickel vs. Lithium• The more money the more range

CS-EE 481 Spring 2006

Founder’s Day, 2006 8University of Portland School of Engineering

Background: displays data

• Speed• Distance• Voltage• Current• Power• Cumulative Power

CS-EE 481 Spring 2006

Founder’s Day, 2006 9University of Portland School of Engineering

Methods: initial research

• Learned industry standards• Motor types (testing and Simulink)• Control circuitry (Simulink)• Battery types (testing)

CS-EE 481 Spring 2006

Founder’s Day, 2006 10University of Portland School of Engineering

Methods: initial design

• Basic power electronics module (PSPICE)• Inexpensive motor and batteries• Chose microcontroller based control (MPLAB)• Connect the two systems (hand calculations)

CS-EE 481 Spring 2006

Founder’s Day, 2006 11University of Portland School of Engineering

Methods: first circuit build

• Simple microcontroller code (MPLAB)• Small scale (12 volts) (Oscilloscope)• Medium scale (36 volts) (Oscilloscope)

CS-EE 481 Spring 2006

Founder’s Day, 2006 12University of Portland School of Engineering

Methods: second design

• Start of second semester• 120 volt• Added control• Fail safes• Regenerative braking

CS-EE 481 Spring 2006

Founder’s Day, 2006 13University of Portland School of Engineering

Methods: final build and design

• Spring break• Digital gauge interfaced to logic control board• Sensors interfaced to digital gauge• Full version of microcontroller code (MPLAB)

CS-EE 481 Spring 2006

Founder’s Day, 2006 14University of Portland School of Engineering

Methods: Simulink

CS-EE 481 Spring 2006

Founder’s Day, 2006 15University of Portland School of Engineering

Methods: Simulink

CS-EE 481 Spring 2006

Founder’s Day, 2006 16University of Portland School of Engineering

Methods: Simulink

CS-EE 481 Spring 2006

Founder’s Day, 2006 17University of Portland School of Engineering

Methods: MPLAB

CS-EE 481 Spring 2006

Founder’s Day, 2006 18University of Portland School of Engineering

Methods: PSPICE120 Volts, 50% Duty cycle, 5kHz period, Full load

CS-EE 481 Spring 2006

Founder’s Day, 2006 19University of Portland School of Engineering

Methods: PSPICE120 Volts, 50% Duty cycle, 500Hz period, Full load

CS-EE 481 Spring 2006

Founder’s Day, 2006 20University of Portland School of Engineering

Methods: VisioTachometer

Throttle

Volt Meter

Logic Control

DisplayControl

Power Electronics

Main Battery

Main Contactor

Kill Switch

Motor

Fans

CS-EE 481 Spring 2006

Founder’s Day, 2006 21University of Portland School of Engineering

Results: three board architecture

• Power electronics• Logic control• Digital display gauge

CS-EE 481 Spring 2006

Founder’s Day, 2006 22University of Portland School of Engineering

Results: power electronics

• Controls power flow• Forward drive• Regenerative braking

CS-EE 481 Spring 2006

Founder’s Day, 2006 23University of Portland School of Engineering

Results: logic control

• The middle board• Controls throttle, motor, regen, cooling, relay• Designed to fail off (pull down resistors)

CS-EE 481 Spring 2006

Founder’s Day, 2006 24University of Portland School of Engineering

Results: digital display

• Interfaces to logic control board and sensors• Samples all sensors @ 60Hz.• Performs math to calculate current• Over current conditions

CS-EE 481 Spring 2006

Founder’s Day, 2006 25University of Portland School of Engineering

Testing Results

• 35 MPH achieved• Current draw of 50 amperes accelerating• Digital display gauge is operational• No over heating in electronics• Kill switch works

CS-EE 481 Spring 2006

Founder’s Day, 2006 26University of Portland School of Engineering

Areas of Improvement

• Current sensor• Microcontroller selection• Motor (ohmic loss)• Batteries (old)

CS-EE 481 Spring 2006

Founder’s Day, 2006 27University of Portland School of Engineering

Improvements: current sensor

• Measuring current

• Reason: math operations in microcontroller

CS-EE 481 Spring 2006

Founder’s Day, 2006 28University of Portland School of Engineering

Improvements: microcontroller

• General purpose

• Additional performance

• Two microcontrollers– Digital display gauge– Motor controller

CS-EE 481 Spring 2006

Founder’s Day, 2006 29University of Portland School of Engineering

Improvements: motor & batteries

• DC motor– Ohmic loss– Job done

• Lead acid batteries– Old– Internal resistance higher

CS-EE 481 Spring 2006

Founder’s Day, 2006 30University of Portland School of Engineering

Conclusions

• Purpose built electronics is key to electric vehicles• Electric motors can compete against gas engines• Being cost competitive as possible• Each person will have their reasons

CS-EE 481 Spring 2006

Founder’s Day, 2006 31University of Portland School of Engineering

Demonstration

• Driving and regenerative braking• Digital display gauges

CS-EE 481 Spring 2006

Founder’s Day, 2006 32University of Portland School of Engineering

Completed Product (side)

CS-EE 481 Spring 2006

Founder’s Day, 2006 33University of Portland School of Engineering

Completed Product (rear)